Development of an Advanced Deformable Phantom to Analyze Dose Differences due to Respiratory Motion
The difference between three-dimensional (3D) and four-dimensional (4D) dose could be affected by factors such as tumor size and motion. To quantitatively analyze the effects of these factors, a phantom that can independently control each factor is required. The purpose of this study is to develop a...
Saved in:
Published in | Progress in Medical Physics Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 1 - 10 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
한국의학물리학회
01.03.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1226-5829 2508-4445 2288-9620 2508-4453 |
DOI | 10.14316/pmp.2017.28.1.1 |
Cover
Summary: | The difference between three-dimensional (3D) and four-dimensional (4D) dose could be affected by factors such as tumor size and motion. To quantitatively analyze the effects of these factors, a phantom that can independently control each factor is required. The purpose of this study is to develop a deformable lung phantom with the above attributes and evaluate the characteristics. A phantom was designed to simulate diaphragm motion with amplitude in the range 1~7 cm and period up to ≥2 s of regular breathing. To simulate different tumors sizes, custom molds were created using a 3D printer and filled with liquid silicone. The accuracy of the phantom diaphragm motion was assessed by comparing measured motion with predicted motion. Because the phantom diaphragm motion is not identical to the tumor motion, the correlation between the diaphragm and tumor motions was calculated by a curve fitting method to emulate user-intended tumor motion. Tumors of different sizes were located at same position, and tumor set-up positions were evaluated. The accuracy of phantom diaphragm motion was better than 1 mm. The diaphragm-tumor correlation showed that the tumor motion in the superior-inferior direction increased with increasing diaphragm motion. The tumor motion was larger in the 10 cm3 tumor than in the 90 cm3 tumor. The range of difference between the tumor set-up positions was 0 to 0.45 cm. This phantom showed independently adjusting factors such as tumor size and motion to facilitate quantitative analysis of the dosimetric impact of respiratory motion according to these factors. KCI Citation Count: 0 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://www.progmedphys.org/journal/view.html?uid=780&sort=&scale=&key=year&keyword=&s_v=28&s_n=1&pn=vol&year=2017&vmd=Full |
ISSN: | 1226-5829 2508-4445 2288-9620 2508-4453 |
DOI: | 10.14316/pmp.2017.28.1.1 |