Survival Outcomes Of Very Young (<40 years) Myeloma Patients

Multiple myeloma (MM) is uncommon in patients below 40 years of age. Between 1960 and 1992 when stem cell transplantation (SCT) was rarely performed and novel agents were unavailable, overall survival (OS) was reported to be 54 months in the Mayo Clinic series of patients with MM below forty years o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBlood Vol. 122; no. 21; p. 2136
Main Authors Painuly, Utkarsh, Pandey, Shivlal, Kumar, Shaji K, Kyle, Robert, Lacy, Martha Q, Gertz, Morie A, Rajkumar, Vincent, Hayman, Suzanne R, Buadi, Francis, Dingli, David, Russell, Stephen J., Lust, John A, McCurdy, Arleigh, Dispenzieri, Angela, Kapoor, Prashant
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 15.11.2013
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is uncommon in patients below 40 years of age. Between 1960 and 1992 when stem cell transplantation (SCT) was rarely performed and novel agents were unavailable, overall survival (OS) was reported to be 54 months in the Mayo Clinic series of patients with MM below forty years of age. The impact of novel agents or SCT in this population is unclear. Herein, we report the outcomes of patients under 40 years of age who were evaluated over a span of more than five decades with a focus on the periods contemporaneous with the introduction of SCT and novel agents, the major therapeutic milestones in the management of MM. We analyzed the medical records of patients with MM under 40 years of age who were evaluated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN between 1/1/1960 and 12/31/2011. SCT and novel agents were utilized infrequently prior to the years 1990 and 2000, respectively. Patients were therefore divided into three cohorts by the year of diagnosis of MM: Group A (1960 -1979), Group B (1980 to 1999) and Group C (2000 –2011) to assess the impact of major therapeutic advances (i.e. Increased utilization of SCT and novel agents compared to conventional chemotherapy). OS was calculated by the Kaplan -Meier method. Out of 8063 unique MM patients seen at our institution during this period, 174 (2%) patients were under 40 years of age at diagnosis. The median age at diagnosis was 36 years (range: 19-39). The estimated median follow-up of the entire cohort was 179 months (95% CI: 149-196 months). The median OS of the entire cohort was 76 months (95% CI: 45-80 months) from diagnosis. The median OS of patients in Groups A (n=29, 17%), B (n=93, 53%), and C (n=52, 30% ) was 44 months (95% CI: 20- 76), 79 months (95% CI: 46-97), and 92 months (95% CI: 42-NR), respectively (p=0.005). No significant OS difference was noted between Groups B and C (Figure). Sixty-six (38%) patients underwent at least one SCT (autologous: 56 patients and allogeneic 10 patients). The utilization of SCT increased over the three time periods from Group A 0%, Group B 39% and Group C 58% (p<0.001). Of 153 patients in whom front-line therapy-related data were available 118 (77%) received conventional and 35(23%) received novel agents. The median OS of patients who underwent transplantation (n=66) was 93 months compared to 46 months for those who did not (n=108, p=.01). In the 66 patients who underwent SCT, the median OS was 93 months for conventional agents-based induction (95% CI: 73-143) versus 97 months (95% CI: 41-187) for novel agent based induction (p=.4). [Display omitted] Sixty-eight (40%) patients received novel agents at some point during the course of their disease [bortezomib 35 (54%), thalidomide 44 (67%), lenalidomide 47 (71%) and pomalidomide 7(11%)]. The median survival of these patients was 131 (95% CI: 88-161) months versus to 46 (CI: 37-74) months for those (n=106) receiving conventional agents only (p=0.0002). OS of patients with MM under 40 years of age in the pre-transplant era (Group A) was significantly shorter than that of patients diagnosed in the era of SCT (Group B) and SCT plus novel agents (Group C). Although improvement of survival outcomes is evident with utilization of novel agents, similar outcomes of Groups B and C indicate lack of incremental benefit over SCT with utilization of novel agents. Maximal survival gain coincides with the introduction of SCT in this unique patient cohort. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding.
AbstractList Abstract Background Multiple myeloma (MM) is uncommon in patients below 40 years of age. Between 1960 and 1992 when stem cell transplantation (SCT) was rarely performed and novel agents were unavailable, overall survival (OS) was reported to be 54 months in the Mayo Clinic series of patients with MM below forty years of age. The impact of novel agents or SCT in this population is unclear. Herein, we report the outcomes of patients under 40 years of age who were evaluated over a span of more than five decades with a focus on the periods contemporaneous with the introduction of SCT and novel agents, the major therapeutic milestones in the management of MM. Methods We analyzed the medical records of patients with MM under 40 years of age who were evaluated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN between 1/1/1960 and 12/31/2011. SCT and novel agents were utilized infrequently prior to the years 1990 and 2000, respectively. Patients were therefore divided into three cohorts by the year of diagnosis of MM: Group A (1960 -1979), Group B (1980 to 1999) and Group C (2000 –2011) to assess the impact of major therapeutic advances (i.e. Increased utilization of SCT and novel agents compared to conventional chemotherapy). OS was calculated by the Kaplan -Meier method. Results Out of 8063 unique MM patients seen at our institution during this period, 174 (2%) patients were under 40 years of age at diagnosis. The median age at diagnosis was 36 years (range: 19-39). The estimated median follow-up of the entire cohort was 179 months (95% CI: 149-196 months). The median OS of the entire cohort was 76 months (95% CI: 45-80 months) from diagnosis. The median OS of patients in Groups A (n=29, 17%), B (n=93, 53%), and C (n=52, 30% ) was 44 months (95% CI: 20- 76), 79 months (95% CI: 46-97), and 92 months (95% CI: 42-NR), respectively (p=0.005). No significant OS difference was noted between Groups B and C (Figure). Sixty-six (38%) patients underwent at least one SCT (autologous: 56 patients and allogeneic 10 patients). The utilization of SCT increased over the three time periods from Group A 0%, Group B 39% and Group C 58% (p<0.001). Of 153 patients in whom front-line therapy-related data were available 118 (77%) received conventional and 35(23%) received novel agents. The median OS of patients who underwent transplantation (n=66) was 93 months compared to 46 months for those who did not (n=108, p=.01). In the 66 patients who underwent SCT, the median OS was 93 months for conventional agents-based induction (95% CI: 73-143) versus 97 months (95% CI: 41-187) for novel agent based induction (p=.4). Sixty-eight (40%) patients received novel agents at some point during the course of their disease [bortezomib 35 (54%), thalidomide 44 (67%), lenalidomide 47 (71%) and pomalidomide 7(11%)]. The median survival of these patients was 131 (95% CI: 88-161) months versus to 46 (CI: 37-74) months for those (n=106) receiving conventional agents only (p=0.0002). Conclusions OS of patients with MM under 40 years of age in the pre-transplant era (Group A) was significantly shorter than that of patients diagnosed in the era of SCT (Group B) and SCT plus novel agents (Group C). Although improvement of survival outcomes is evident with utilization of novel agents, similar outcomes of Groups B and C indicate lack of incremental benefit over SCT with utilization of novel agents. Maximal survival gain coincides with the introduction of SCT in this unique patient cohort. Disclosures: Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is uncommon in patients below 40 years of age. Between 1960 and 1992 when stem cell transplantation (SCT) was rarely performed and novel agents were unavailable, overall survival (OS) was reported to be 54 months in the Mayo Clinic series of patients with MM below forty years of age. The impact of novel agents or SCT in this population is unclear. Herein, we report the outcomes of patients under 40 years of age who were evaluated over a span of more than five decades with a focus on the periods contemporaneous with the introduction of SCT and novel agents, the major therapeutic milestones in the management of MM. We analyzed the medical records of patients with MM under 40 years of age who were evaluated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN between 1/1/1960 and 12/31/2011. SCT and novel agents were utilized infrequently prior to the years 1990 and 2000, respectively. Patients were therefore divided into three cohorts by the year of diagnosis of MM: Group A (1960 -1979), Group B (1980 to 1999) and Group C (2000 –2011) to assess the impact of major therapeutic advances (i.e. Increased utilization of SCT and novel agents compared to conventional chemotherapy). OS was calculated by the Kaplan -Meier method. Out of 8063 unique MM patients seen at our institution during this period, 174 (2%) patients were under 40 years of age at diagnosis. The median age at diagnosis was 36 years (range: 19-39). The estimated median follow-up of the entire cohort was 179 months (95% CI: 149-196 months). The median OS of the entire cohort was 76 months (95% CI: 45-80 months) from diagnosis. The median OS of patients in Groups A (n=29, 17%), B (n=93, 53%), and C (n=52, 30% ) was 44 months (95% CI: 20- 76), 79 months (95% CI: 46-97), and 92 months (95% CI: 42-NR), respectively (p=0.005). No significant OS difference was noted between Groups B and C (Figure). Sixty-six (38%) patients underwent at least one SCT (autologous: 56 patients and allogeneic 10 patients). The utilization of SCT increased over the three time periods from Group A 0%, Group B 39% and Group C 58% (p<0.001). Of 153 patients in whom front-line therapy-related data were available 118 (77%) received conventional and 35(23%) received novel agents. The median OS of patients who underwent transplantation (n=66) was 93 months compared to 46 months for those who did not (n=108, p=.01). In the 66 patients who underwent SCT, the median OS was 93 months for conventional agents-based induction (95% CI: 73-143) versus 97 months (95% CI: 41-187) for novel agent based induction (p=.4). [Display omitted] Sixty-eight (40%) patients received novel agents at some point during the course of their disease [bortezomib 35 (54%), thalidomide 44 (67%), lenalidomide 47 (71%) and pomalidomide 7(11%)]. The median survival of these patients was 131 (95% CI: 88-161) months versus to 46 (CI: 37-74) months for those (n=106) receiving conventional agents only (p=0.0002). OS of patients with MM under 40 years of age in the pre-transplant era (Group A) was significantly shorter than that of patients diagnosed in the era of SCT (Group B) and SCT plus novel agents (Group C). Although improvement of survival outcomes is evident with utilization of novel agents, similar outcomes of Groups B and C indicate lack of incremental benefit over SCT with utilization of novel agents. Maximal survival gain coincides with the introduction of SCT in this unique patient cohort. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding.
Author Hayman, Suzanne R
Kumar, Shaji K
Gertz, Morie A
Pandey, Shivlal
Buadi, Francis
Dingli, David
Russell, Stephen J.
Kapoor, Prashant
Painuly, Utkarsh
Kyle, Robert
Rajkumar, Vincent
Dispenzieri, Angela
Lacy, Martha Q
McCurdy, Arleigh
Lust, John A
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Utkarsh
  surname: Painuly
  fullname: Painuly, Utkarsh
  organization: 4th Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital and Charles University Faculty of Medicine, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic., Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Shivlal
  surname: Pandey
  fullname: Pandey, Shivlal
  organization: Louisiana State University/E.A.Conway Medical Center, Monroe, LA, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Shaji K
  surname: Kumar
  fullname: Kumar, Shaji K
  organization: Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Robert
  surname: Kyle
  fullname: Kyle, Robert
  organization: Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Martha Q
  surname: Lacy
  fullname: Lacy, Martha Q
  organization: Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Morie A
  surname: Gertz
  fullname: Gertz, Morie A
  organization: Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Vincent
  surname: Rajkumar
  fullname: Rajkumar, Vincent
  organization: Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Suzanne R
  surname: Hayman
  fullname: Hayman, Suzanne R
  organization: Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Francis
  surname: Buadi
  fullname: Buadi, Francis
  organization: Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
– sequence: 10
  givenname: David
  surname: Dingli
  fullname: Dingli, David
  organization: Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Stephen J.
  surname: Russell
  fullname: Russell, Stephen J.
  organization: Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
– sequence: 12
  givenname: John A
  surname: Lust
  fullname: Lust, John A
  organization: Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Arleigh
  surname: McCurdy
  fullname: McCurdy, Arleigh
  organization: Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Angela
  surname: Dispenzieri
  fullname: Dispenzieri, Angela
  organization: Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Prashant
  surname: Kapoor
  fullname: Kapoor, Prashant
  organization: Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
BookMark eNqFUE1LAzEQDVLBtvobzFEPW2ey2S_opRS_oFJBLXgKSXZWVrYbSbaF_fduW-_C8IY5vDfvvQkbta4lxq4RZoi5uDONc-Vsg0LMBA4Tp0c4Y2NMRB4BCBixMQCkkSwyvGCTEL4BUMYiGbP5287v671u-HrXWbelwNcV35Dv-afbtV_8Zi6B96R9uOUvPTVuq_mr7mpqu3DJzivdBLr621P28XD_vnyKVuvH5-ViFVlMh7c2z0SSYUKSEoTM5BDb4awMxLos8jg1QlZ5YbAyIrOS4gKl0bZIAfMCsYqnLDvpWu9C8FSpH19vte8VgjqUoI4lqEMJSqA65D_CwFycmDTY29fkVbCDdUtl7cl2qnT1vxq_faJmxQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1177_2381468318814253
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clml_2023_08_019
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013 American Society of Hematology
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013 American Society of Hematology
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1182/blood.V122.21.2136.2136
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Chemistry
Biology
Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1528-0020
EndPage 2136
ExternalDocumentID 10_1182_blood_V122_21_2136_2136
S0006497119654121
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.55
1CY
23N
2WC
34G
39C
4.4
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6I.
6J9
AAEDW
AAFTH
AAXUO
ABOCM
ABVKL
ACGFO
ADBBV
AENEX
AFOSN
AHPSJ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BTFSW
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EX3
F5P
FDB
FRP
GS5
GX1
IH2
K-O
KQ8
L7B
LSO
MJL
N9A
OK1
P2P
R.V
RHF
RHI
ROL
SJN
THE
TR2
TWZ
W2D
W8F
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X7M
YHG
YKV
ZA5
0R~
0SF
AALRI
AAYXX
ADVLN
AITUG
AKRWK
AMRAJ
CITATION
H13
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1606-c8725715e4e5107b803c715fb03ad9836b24f89b1fb27c4e3914bac96018911f3
IEDL.DBID ABVKL
ISSN 0006-4971
IngestDate Fri Aug 23 04:00:54 EDT 2024
Fri Feb 23 02:42:30 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 21
Language English
License This article is made available under the Elsevier license.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1606-c8725715e4e5107b803c715fb03ad9836b24f89b1fb27c4e3914bac96018911f3
OpenAccessLink https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006497119654121
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_V122_21_2136_2136
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1182_blood_V122_21_2136_2136
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-11-15
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-11-15
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-11-15
  day: 15
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Blood
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
SSID ssj0014325
Score 2.1382782
Snippet Multiple myeloma (MM) is uncommon in patients below 40 years of age. Between 1960 and 1992 when stem cell transplantation (SCT) was rarely performed and novel...
Abstract Background Multiple myeloma (MM) is uncommon in patients below 40 years of age. Between 1960 and 1992 when stem cell transplantation (SCT) was rarely...
SourceID crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Publisher
StartPage 2136
Title Survival Outcomes Of Very Young (<40 years) Myeloma Patients
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood.V122.21.2136.2136
Volume 122
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8NAEF6KxcdFtFWsj7IHET2kzT7SJNJLWyzVWitoS28hm-xCwT7o45B_7-wmEQXBg5clCQwkX3a-mdmd2UHoOrZFLBxOLQb0Z_HY8a0QaNAinnCc0I-Ja5JoBi-N3og_TZxJAXXyWhidVplxf8rphq2zJ_UMzfpyOtU1vmBOfZfoM_E40cXkRQreL2hnsdUe95-_NhM4o2kjAwietUCW5gWedd1kh9fGhNIahWiRsIYZfjdS3wxP9wgdZh4jbqUvdYwKcl5C5dYcouVZgm-wyeE0i-MltNvOr_Y7eSe3EtobZBvoZdR82wI3wOzCw-0Gvlmu8VDhsVwl2Og9vm1yGycw_dd3eJDIj8UsxK_p2avrEzTqPrx3elbWQMGKCAQmVuS5oJHEkVyC6rnCs1kEt0rYLIx9jzUE5crzBVGCuhGXzCdchBEENcQDElTsFO3MF3N5hjBAKJQbKQHWjIOgR4VQoP2Kx66II7-C7ByxYJmekxGY-MKjgQE50CAHlAQaXzNU0H2ObPDjlwfA5n8Jn_9H-AIdUN3VQmfzOZdoZ7PayivwLTaims2dKnjXj_1PSsTHnA
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,27581,27936,27937,45675
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3dS8MwED_GxI8X0an4bR5E9KFbk6ZrK3uZQ5m6qaCOvYWmTWCg23DbQ_97L2krCoIPvoS2cND-mvvdXXKXAzhNXZlKnzPHQ_pzeOpHTow06NBQ-n4cpTSwSTT9h2b3ld8N_WEFOmUtjEmrLLg_53TL1sWTRoFmYzoamRpfNKdRQM2ZeJyaYvIl9AYCvwpL7avBfe9rM4F7LG9kgMGzESjSvNCzbtjs8PqAMlZnGC1Sr2mH343UN8NzswHrhcdI2vlLbUJFjWuw1R5jtPyekTNiczjt4ngNlq_Kq9VO2cmtBiv9YgN9C1rPC-QGnF3kcTHHb1Yz8qjJQH1kxOo9OW9xl2Q4_WcXpJ-pt8l7TJ7ys1dn2_B6c_3S6TpFAwUnoRiYOEkYoEZSX3GFqhfI0PUSvNXS9eI0Cr2mZFyHkaRasiDhyosol3GCQQ0NkQS1twPV8WSsdoEghFIHiZZozTgKhkxKjdqveRrINIn2wC0RE9P8nAxh44uQCQuyMCALRoXB1w57cFkiK378coFs_pfw_n-ET2C1-9Lvid7tw_0BrDHT4cJk9vmHUJ1_LNQR-hlzeVzMo08ZdcmR
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survival+Outcomes+Of+Very+Young+%28%3C40+years%29+Myeloma+Patients&rft.jtitle=Blood&rft.au=Painuly%2C+Utkarsh&rft.au=Pandey%2C+Shivlal&rft.au=Kumar%2C+Shaji+K&rft.au=Kyle%2C+Robert&rft.date=2013-11-15&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0006-4971&rft.eissn=1528-0020&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=2136&rft.epage=2136&rft_id=info:doi/10.1182%2Fblood.V122.21.2136.2136&rft.externalDocID=S0006497119654121
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0006-4971&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0006-4971&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0006-4971&client=summon