Including Patient Input In Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument Development: Examples From the MDASI-CML

Abstract 2573 The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recognizes patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as acceptable measures of treatment benefit and risk in medical product clinical trials. The FDA requires that patient input be included in the development and testing of PRO instruments. W...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBlood Vol. 116; no. 21; p. 2573
Main Authors Williams, Loretta A, Cortes, Jorge E., Ault, Patricia S, Garcia-Gonzalez, Araceli, Williams, Janet L, Cleeland, Charles S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 19.11.2010
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Abstract 2573 The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recognizes patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as acceptable measures of treatment benefit and risk in medical product clinical trials. The FDA requires that patient input be included in the development and testing of PRO instruments. We have adopted a three-step process for the development of multi-symptom PROs that includes patient input in each step. This method is being used for the development of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) for Philadelphia-chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The MDASI is a PRO measure of symptom burden, defined as the combined impact of all disease-related and therapy-related symptoms on one's ability to function as one did before the onset of disease or therapy, in patients with cancer. The core MDASI includes 13 symptom severity items and 6 interference items rated at their worst in the last 24 hours on a 0–10 scale, with 0 meaning no symptom or interference and 10 meaning as bad as can be imagined or complete interference. The first step in the process was qualitative interviews with 35 patients with CML about their symptom experiences. Symptoms were extracted by descriptive exploratory analysis from interview transcripts. Step 2 was grading of the relevance of the symptoms (0 to 4 scale) from Step 1 by an expert panel that included professional care providers as well as patients with CML and their family caregivers. Symptoms that received a mean relevance rating of ≥ 3 were added to the 13 symptom items and 6 interference items of the core MDASI for validation in Step 3. One hundred and sixty patients with CML are completing the experimental MDASI-CML, which will undergo psychometric validation and item reduction. The first 30 patients in Step 3 completed a cognitive debriefing interview about their experience of completing the MDASI-CML. Patient characteristics are in Table 1. No personal information was collected on the expert panel members. Thirty-nine symptoms (13 core and 26 CML-specific) were extracted from the Step 1 qualitative interviews and rated by the expert panel. Four physicians, 5 nurses, 3 patients, and 3 family caregivers returned ratings. Six of the 26 CML-specific items had mean relevance ratings of ≥ 3. The experimental MDASI-CML includes the 13 core symptoms, 6 CML-specific symptoms, and 6 core interference items (Table 2). Table 2MDASI-CML ItemsCORE SYMPTOM ITEMSCML-SPECIFIC SYMPTOM ITEMSINTERFERENCE ITEMSPainDiarrheaGeneral activitiesFatigueSwellingMoodNauseaRash or skin changesWork (including around the house)Disturbed sleepMuscle soreness or crampingRelations with othersDistressEasy bruising or bleedingWalkingShortness of breathMalaise (not feeling well)Enjoyment of lifeTrouble rememberingLack of appetiteDrowsiness (sleepiness)Dry mouthSadnessVomitingNumbness or tingling During the cognitive debriefing, over 80% of patients reported that the MDASI-CML items were not at all difficult to complete or understand, were completely comfortable to answer, and were not repetitive, and that the 0–10 scoring system for rating severity of symptoms and interference with daily activities was very easy to use. Nine patients listed 12 additional symptoms that should be included, but each symptom was only mentioned by 1 patient and had already been eliminated because of low relevance ratings by the expert panel. Inclusion of patient input at each step of PRO development ensures that the instrument measures what is important to patients and enhances content validity. It further ensures that the measure is easy to understand and complete. Psychometric validation of the MDASI-CML is proceeding. No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
AbstractList Abstract 2573 The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recognizes patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as acceptable measures of treatment benefit and risk in medical product clinical trials. The FDA requires that patient input be included in the development and testing of PRO instruments. We have adopted a three-step process for the development of multi-symptom PROs that includes patient input in each step. This method is being used for the development of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) for Philadelphia-chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The MDASI is a PRO measure of symptom burden, defined as the combined impact of all disease-related and therapy-related symptoms on one's ability to function as one did before the onset of disease or therapy, in patients with cancer. The core MDASI includes 13 symptom severity items and 6 interference items rated at their worst in the last 24 hours on a 0–10 scale, with 0 meaning no symptom or interference and 10 meaning as bad as can be imagined or complete interference. The first step in the process was qualitative interviews with 35 patients with CML about their symptom experiences. Symptoms were extracted by descriptive exploratory analysis from interview transcripts. Step 2 was grading of the relevance of the symptoms (0 to 4 scale) from Step 1 by an expert panel that included professional care providers as well as patients with CML and their family caregivers. Symptoms that received a mean relevance rating of ≥ 3 were added to the 13 symptom items and 6 interference items of the core MDASI for validation in Step 3. One hundred and sixty patients with CML are completing the experimental MDASI-CML, which will undergo psychometric validation and item reduction. The first 30 patients in Step 3 completed a cognitive debriefing interview about their experience of completing the MDASI-CML. Patient characteristics are in Table 1. No personal information was collected on the expert panel members. Thirty-nine symptoms (13 core and 26 CML-specific) were extracted from the Step 1 qualitative interviews and rated by the expert panel. Four physicians, 5 nurses, 3 patients, and 3 family caregivers returned ratings. Six of the 26 CML-specific items had mean relevance ratings of ≥ 3. The experimental MDASI-CML includes the 13 core symptoms, 6 CML-specific symptoms, and 6 core interference items (Table 2). Table 2MDASI-CML ItemsCORE SYMPTOM ITEMSCML-SPECIFIC SYMPTOM ITEMSINTERFERENCE ITEMSPainDiarrheaGeneral activitiesFatigueSwellingMoodNauseaRash or skin changesWork (including around the house)Disturbed sleepMuscle soreness or crampingRelations with othersDistressEasy bruising or bleedingWalkingShortness of breathMalaise (not feeling well)Enjoyment of lifeTrouble rememberingLack of appetiteDrowsiness (sleepiness)Dry mouthSadnessVomitingNumbness or tingling During the cognitive debriefing, over 80% of patients reported that the MDASI-CML items were not at all difficult to complete or understand, were completely comfortable to answer, and were not repetitive, and that the 0–10 scoring system for rating severity of symptoms and interference with daily activities was very easy to use. Nine patients listed 12 additional symptoms that should be included, but each symptom was only mentioned by 1 patient and had already been eliminated because of low relevance ratings by the expert panel. Inclusion of patient input at each step of PRO development ensures that the instrument measures what is important to patients and enhances content validity. It further ensures that the measure is easy to understand and complete. Psychometric validation of the MDASI-CML is proceeding. No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Abstract Abstract 2573 Introduction: The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recognizes patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as acceptable measures of treatment benefit and risk in medical product clinical trials. The FDA requires that patient input be included in the development and testing of PRO instruments. We have adopted a three-step process for the development of multi-symptom PROs that includes patient input in each step. This method is being used for the development of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) for Philadelphia-chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The MDASI is a PRO measure of symptom burden, defined as the combined impact of all disease-related and therapy-related symptoms on one's ability to function as one did before the onset of disease or therapy, in patients with cancer. The core MDASI includes 13 symptom severity items and 6 interference items rated at their worst in the last 24 hours on a 0–10 scale, with 0 meaning no symptom or interference and 10 meaning as bad as can be imagined or complete interference. Patients and Methods: The first step in the process was qualitative interviews with 35 patients with CML about their symptom experiences. Symptoms were extracted by descriptive exploratory analysis from interview transcripts. Step 2 was grading of the relevance of the symptoms (0 to 4 scale) from Step 1 by an expert panel that included professional care providers as well as patients with CML and their family caregivers. Symptoms that received a mean relevance rating of ≥ 3 were added to the 13 symptom items and 6 interference items of the core MDASI for validation in Step 3. One hundred and sixty patients with CML are completing the experimental MDASI-CML, which will undergo psychometric validation and item reduction. The first 30 patients in Step 3 completed a cognitive debriefing interview about their experience of completing the MDASI-CML. Results: Patient characteristics are in Table 1. No personal information was collected on the expert panel members. Thirty-nine symptoms (13 core and 26 CML-specific) were extracted from the Step 1 qualitative interviews and rated by the expert panel. Four physicians, 5 nurses, 3 patients, and 3 family caregivers returned ratings. Six of the 26 CML-specific items had mean relevance ratings of ≥ 3. The experimental MDASI-CML includes the 13 core symptoms, 6 CML-specific symptoms, and 6 core interference items (Table 2). During the cognitive debriefing, over 80% of patients reported that the MDASI-CML items were not at all difficult to complete or understand, were completely comfortable to answer, and were not repetitive, and that the 0–10 scoring system for rating severity of symptoms and interference with daily activities was very easy to use. Nine patients listed 12 additional symptoms that should be included, but each symptom was only mentioned by 1 patient and had already been eliminated because of low relevance ratings by the expert panel. Conclusions: Inclusion of patient input at each step of PRO development ensures that the instrument measures what is important to patients and enhances content validity. It further ensures that the measure is easy to understand and complete. Psychometric validation of the MDASI-CML is proceeding. Disclosure: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Author Williams, Loretta A
Garcia-Gonzalez, Araceli
Cortes, Jorge E.
Cleeland, Charles S
Williams, Janet L
Ault, Patricia S
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Loretta A
  surname: Williams
  fullname: Williams, Loretta A
  organization: Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jorge E.
  surname: Cortes
  fullname: Cortes, Jorge E.
  organization: Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Patricia S
  surname: Ault
  fullname: Ault, Patricia S
  organization: Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Araceli
  surname: Garcia-Gonzalez
  fullname: Garcia-Gonzalez, Araceli
  organization: Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Janet L
  surname: Williams
  fullname: Williams, Janet L
  organization: Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Charles S
  surname: Cleeland
  fullname: Cleeland, Charles S
  organization: Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
BookMark eNqFkMtOwzAQRS1UJNrCN5AfSPDEebKr-oBIrYqgYms59rgEJXHkJBX8PUkLazZ3RvO4mjkzMqlNjYTcA_UAEv8hL41R3jtA5Png-WHMznJFphD6iUupTydkSimN3CCN4YbM2vaTUgiYH07JMatl2auiPjovoiuw7pysbvpR_wruKzbGdqicfd9JU-HQazvbV-PwCk9YmmbMH531l6iaEltnY03ldB_o7FaLt8xd7ra35FqLssW73zgnh836sHx2t_unbLnYuhIiytxQ-0rlEDFMkSY0l1SD0jpGlYBgGOc6EHkMmOaBYFKIgGGYaABFtY5UyuYkvthKa9rWouaNLSphvzlQPuLiZ1x8xMV94COpswybi8smDtedCrS8lcP3ElVhUXZcmeJfjx_3M3kJ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1038_s41375_023_01888_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpainsymman_2013_02_007
crossref_primary_10_2147_PPA_S394332
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2010 American Society of Hematology
Copyright_xml – notice: 2010 American Society of Hematology
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1182/blood.V116.21.2573.2573
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Chemistry
Biology
Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1528-0020
EndPage 2573
ExternalDocumentID 10_1182_blood_V116_21_2573_2573
S0006497119446405
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.55
1CY
23N
2WC
34G
39C
4.4
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6I.
6J9
9M8
AAEDW
AAFTH
AAXUO
ABOCM
ABVKL
ACGFO
ADBBV
AENEX
AFFNX
AFOSN
AHPSJ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BTFSW
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EX3
F5P
FDB
FRP
GS5
GX1
IH2
K-O
KQ8
L7B
LSO
MJL
N4W
N9A
OK1
P2P
R.V
RHF
RHI
ROL
SJN
THE
TR2
TWZ
W2D
W8F
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X7M
YHG
YKV
ZA5
0R~
0SF
AALRI
AAYXX
ADVLN
AITUG
AKRWK
AMRAJ
CITATION
H13
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1603-5f2ddb163e9e080bc0f1dff7ed81a3e7bf4ab71e9b4a3caa43e58f11d0ff6d93
IEDL.DBID ABVKL
ISSN 0006-4971
IngestDate Fri Aug 23 00:27:36 EDT 2024
Fri Feb 23 02:43:42 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 21
Language English
License This article is made available under the Elsevier license.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1603-5f2ddb163e9e080bc0f1dff7ed81a3e7bf4ab71e9b4a3caa43e58f11d0ff6d93
OpenAccessLink https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006497119446405
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_V116_21_2573_2573
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1182_blood_V116_21_2573_2573
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2010-11-19
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-11-19
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2010
  text: 2010-11-19
  day: 19
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Blood
PublicationYear 2010
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
SSID ssj0014325
Score 2.0273798
Snippet Abstract 2573 The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recognizes patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as acceptable measures of treatment benefit and...
Abstract Abstract 2573 Introduction: The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recognizes patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as acceptable measures of...
SourceID crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Publisher
StartPage 2573
Title Including Patient Input In Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument Development: Examples From the MDASI-CML
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood.V116.21.2573.2573
Volume 116
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3dS8MwED_GxI8X0U1xfpEH8S1b06Zp69s2NzZ1KviBbyVpEhm4OtSB_vcmaSsKgg--hBI4KHfh7nfJ7-4AjgiTklIRYt_3Iky5jjD3KMeJokwLkUgS2HrnySUb3dGzh_ChBv2qFsbSKkvfX_h0563LnU6pzc58OrU1viacJhExaThl1PYxXfLtM1Mdlrq9-_OLr8cEGvjFIAOTPFuBkuZlkHXHscPb94Swtm-yxTAK3PJ7kPoWeIYbsF4iRtQtfmoTaipvQLObm2x59oGOkeNwusvxBiz3qq_VfjXJrQErk_IBvQmPxh88LWy8QtdFR1U0zucLu1YbuMDkSqKrxZtRi0Jj12XWXiOibxyjEzR457a38CsavjzPkEGSaHLavRnj_uRiC26Hg9v-CJezFnBmB03jUPtSCgPOVKIMiBSZp4nUOlIyJjxQkdCUi4ioRFAeZJzTQIWxJkR6WjOZBNtQz59ztQPI5Lk81lnCA1tzy1QswpgxTRmJPSYy1QKv0m06LzpqpC4Tif3UmSO15kh9klpLuKUFJ5UN0h-HIzV-_y_h3f8I78GaowtY3l-yD3WjbXVgUMibOCxP2aHB4ePzTy2V2e0
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,27600,27955,27956,45696
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1RSxwxEB5EafVF2rNFa1vzUPoWb7ObzW58O68ed3prC72KbyHZJEWo62E90H_fSXZXLBT64EtYAoFlZpj5JvlmBuATE9ZybnKapklBufYF1QnXVDouvDHSsizUO1fnYvqDn17ml2sw7mthAq2y8_2tT4_eutsZdtIcLq-uQo0vhlNZMEzDueChj-kGogGJZr4xOr44mz8-JvAsbQcZYPIcDnQ0L0TWw8gOP7xgTBymmC3mRRaXfwepJ4Fn8gq2O8RIRu1PvYY11wxgZ9Rgtnz9QD6TyOGMl-MDeHHcf22O-0luA3hZdQ_oO_AT_cGvVYhX5FvbUZXMmuUqrP0GbTG5s-Tr6g7F4sgsdpkN14jkCcfoiJzc69Bb-DeZ3N5cE0SSpPoy-j6j42r-BhaTk8V4SrtZC7QOg6Zp7lNrDYIzJx2CSFMnnlnvC2dLpjNXGM-1KZiThuus1ppnLi89YzbxXliZvYX15qZxu0Awz9Wlr6XOQs2tcKXJSyE8F6xMhKndHiS9bNWy7aihYiZSpiqqQwV1qJSpoIm47MFRrwP1l3Eo9Pv_O_zuOYcPYHO6qOZqPjs_24etSB0IHED5HtZR8u4DIpI787GzuD-GGdvt
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Including+Patient+Input+In+Patient-Reported+Outcome+Instrument+Development%3A+Examples+From+the+MDASI-CML&rft.jtitle=Blood&rft.au=Williams%2C+Loretta+A&rft.au=Cortes%2C+Jorge+E.&rft.au=Ault%2C+Patricia+S&rft.au=Garcia-Gonzalez%2C+Araceli&rft.date=2010-11-19&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0006-4971&rft.eissn=1528-0020&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=2573&rft.epage=2573&rft_id=info:doi/10.1182%2Fblood.V116.21.2573.2573&rft.externalDocID=S0006497119446405
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0006-4971&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0006-4971&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0006-4971&client=summon