A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Local Intraurethral Anesthetics in Optical Internal Urethrotomy at the Outpatient Clinic
To assess feasibility and efficacy of local topical urethral anesthesia at optical internal urethrotomy (OIU) in patients with anterior and posterior urethral strictures at outpatient clinic. One hundred and twenty eight patients were prospectively randomized to perform OIU with intraurethral priloc...
Saved in:
Published in | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) Vol. 170; pp. 21 - 26 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.12.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To assess feasibility and efficacy of local topical urethral anesthesia at optical internal urethrotomy (OIU) in patients with anterior and posterior urethral strictures at outpatient clinic.
One hundred and twenty eight patients were prospectively randomized to perform OIU with intraurethral prilocaine solution (group 1 = 64 patients) or intraurethral lidocaine gel (group 2 = 64 patients). Visual analog scale was used for procedure related pain evaluation at the beginning, during, and one hour after the procedure. All patients had follow-ups for a minimum of 12 months. Treatment failure was defined as Qmax < 12ml/sec at uroflowmetry and observed urethral stricture on cystoscopy.
The overall success rate of the OIU was 75.8%. The intraoperative mean visual analogue score in group 2 (5,1 ± 1,77) was significantly higher than the group 1 (3.7 ± 1.9) (P = 0.0001). The median time to stricture recurrence was 9.2 months (range 1-13 months). Stricture recurrences were noted in 15 patients in Group 1 and 16 patients in Group 2 during the follow-up period.
Prilocaine solution as a local anesthetic is a better option than intraurethral lidocaine gel in the OIU procedure and allows successful OIU to be performed in outpatient clinic. It can be preferred as a local anesthetic for OIU, particularly in unfit patients for general/regional anesthesia. Although it provides successful pain relief, it still cannot prevent experiencing moderate or severe pain in a group of patients. More studies about more effective local anesthetics for pain relief during OIU at the outpatient clinic are required. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To assess feasibility and efficacy of local topical urethral anesthesia at optical internal urethrotomy (OIU) in patients with anterior and posterior urethral strictures at outpatient clinic.
One hundred and twenty eight patients were prospectively randomized to perform OIU with intraurethral prilocaine solution (group 1 = 64 patients) or intraurethral lidocaine gel (group 2 = 64 patients). Visual analog scale was used for procedure related pain evaluation at the beginning, during, and one hour after the procedure. All patients had follow-ups for a minimum of 12 months. Treatment failure was defined as Qmax < 12ml/sec at uroflowmetry and observed urethral stricture on cystoscopy.
The overall success rate of the OIU was 75.8%. The intraoperative mean visual analogue score in group 2 (5,1 ± 1,77) was significantly higher than the group 1 (3.7 ± 1.9) (P = 0.0001). The median time to stricture recurrence was 9.2 months (range 1-13 months). Stricture recurrences were noted in 15 patients in Group 1 and 16 patients in Group 2 during the follow-up period.
Prilocaine solution as a local anesthetic is a better option than intraurethral lidocaine gel in the OIU procedure and allows successful OIU to be performed in outpatient clinic. It can be preferred as a local anesthetic for OIU, particularly in unfit patients for general/regional anesthesia. Although it provides successful pain relief, it still cannot prevent experiencing moderate or severe pain in a group of patients. More studies about more effective local anesthetics for pain relief during OIU at the outpatient clinic are required. To assess feasibility and efficacy of local topical urethral anesthesia at optical internal urethrotomy (OIU) in patients with anterior and posterior urethral strictures at outpatient clinic.OBJECTIVETo assess feasibility and efficacy of local topical urethral anesthesia at optical internal urethrotomy (OIU) in patients with anterior and posterior urethral strictures at outpatient clinic.One hundred and twenty eight patients were prospectively randomized to perform OIU with intraurethral prilocaine solution (group 1 = 64 patients) or intraurethral lidocaine gel (group 2 = 64 patients). Visual analog scale was used for procedure related pain evaluation at the beginning, during, and one hour after the procedure. All patients had follow-ups for a minimum of 12 months. Treatment failure was defined as Qmax < 12ml/sec at uroflowmetry and observed urethral stricture on cystoscopy.METHODSOne hundred and twenty eight patients were prospectively randomized to perform OIU with intraurethral prilocaine solution (group 1 = 64 patients) or intraurethral lidocaine gel (group 2 = 64 patients). Visual analog scale was used for procedure related pain evaluation at the beginning, during, and one hour after the procedure. All patients had follow-ups for a minimum of 12 months. Treatment failure was defined as Qmax < 12ml/sec at uroflowmetry and observed urethral stricture on cystoscopy.The overall success rate of the OIU was 75.8%. The intraoperative mean visual analogue score in group 2 (5,1 ± 1,77) was significantly higher than the group 1 (3.7 ± 1.9) (P = 0.0001). The median time to stricture recurrence was 9.2 months (range 1-13 months). Stricture recurrences were noted in 15 patients in Group 1 and 16 patients in Group 2 during the follow-up period.RESULTSThe overall success rate of the OIU was 75.8%. The intraoperative mean visual analogue score in group 2 (5,1 ± 1,77) was significantly higher than the group 1 (3.7 ± 1.9) (P = 0.0001). The median time to stricture recurrence was 9.2 months (range 1-13 months). Stricture recurrences were noted in 15 patients in Group 1 and 16 patients in Group 2 during the follow-up period.Prilocaine solution as a local anesthetic is a better option than intraurethral lidocaine gel in the OIU procedure and allows successful OIU to be performed in outpatient clinic. It can be preferred as a local anesthetic for OIU, particularly in unfit patients for general/regional anesthesia. Although it provides successful pain relief, it still cannot prevent experiencing moderate or severe pain in a group of patients. More studies about more effective local anesthetics for pain relief during OIU at the outpatient clinic are required.CONCLUSIONPrilocaine solution as a local anesthetic is a better option than intraurethral lidocaine gel in the OIU procedure and allows successful OIU to be performed in outpatient clinic. It can be preferred as a local anesthetic for OIU, particularly in unfit patients for general/regional anesthesia. Although it provides successful pain relief, it still cannot prevent experiencing moderate or severe pain in a group of patients. More studies about more effective local anesthetics for pain relief during OIU at the outpatient clinic are required. |
Author | Aydemir, Sabri Ergün, Osman Öztürk, Sefa Alperen |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Osman orcidid: 0000-0001-7611-0933 surname: Ergün fullname: Ergün, Osman email: osmanergun77@gmail.com – sequence: 2 givenname: Sefa Alperen surname: Öztürk fullname: Öztürk, Sefa Alperen – sequence: 3 givenname: Sabri surname: Aydemir fullname: Aydemir, Sabri |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36195164$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkdGO1CAUholZ486uPoKGS29aaSm0XJnJ6Oomk0xiZq8JpYddJi1UoJrxIXzmZZzRW6_4ge_8B85_g66cd4DQ24qUFan4h0O5BD_6x2NZk7ouSVcSSl-gVcXqthBCsCu0IkSQoqkFu0Y3MR4IIZzz9hW6prwSrOLNCv1e42_KDX6yv2DAG-9Sdh2z3AerxnwwzSpY94j3Pz3-ZI2BAC7hrdf59j7TagmQnkLerR3E9ATJ6oitw7s5qzMEwWXx8Af0yU9HrBLOKN4taVbJnhw3o3VWv0YvjRojvLmst-jh7vN-87XY7r7cb9bbQlesawrTK8NZT6jqRNPQbjCKCE172lHDGFXQtKKFphm05sIoRQzpu74WbWfM0PeK3qL3Z985-O9LfrecbNQwjsqBX6Ks27ritG0Zzyg7ozr4GAMYOQc7qXCUFZGnKORBXqKQpygk6WSOIte9u7RY-gmGf1V_Z5-Bj2cA8kd_WAgy6jwKDYMNoJMcvP1Pi2c9YKLZ |
Cites_doi | 10.4103/1658-354X.203017 10.1016/j.urology.2012.09.020 10.1016/0030-4220(92)90367-Y 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90270-K 10.5152/tud.2019.49354 10.1258/td.2009.090121 10.4103/0974-7796.140997 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01732-6 10.5812/numonthly.4524 10.1089/end.2011.0583 10.4103/1658-354X.159463 10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.017 10.1007/s11255-006-9046-0 10.1111/bju.14875 10.4103/0974-7796.184901 10.1089/end.2007.0097 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00231.x |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2022 Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022 Elsevier Inc. – notice: Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1527-9995 |
EndPage | 26 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_urology_2022_08_033 36195164 S0090429522007828 |
Genre | Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M -RU .1- .55 .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 123 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 29Q 3O- 4.4 457 4CK 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 6PF 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AABNK AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAEJM AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AAWTL AAXUO ABBQC ABFNM ABLJU ABLVK ABMAC ABMZM ABOCM ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACIUM ACRLP ACRZS ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD AEBSH AEKER AENEX AEVXI AFCTW AFFNX AFKWA AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AHPSJ AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJJEV AJOXV AJRQY AJUYK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ANZVX ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 EX3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HEA HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM L7B LCYCR LZ2 M29 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OK. OW. OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAE SCC SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K UV1 WH7 WOW WUQ X7M XPP Z5R ZA5 ZGI ~G- AAXKI AFJKZ AKRWK CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1584-fbaf65b03a894438dfa09c3b383f553ae4797e44dcc69faa0f0b8b2978ffdbba3 |
IEDL.DBID | AIKHN |
ISSN | 0090-4295 1527-9995 |
IngestDate | Sat Aug 17 04:41:56 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 26 17:31:31 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 18 09:18:57 EDT 2024 Fri Feb 23 02:37:41 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1584-fbaf65b03a894438dfa09c3b383f553ae4797e44dcc69faa0f0b8b2978ffdbba3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-7611-0933 |
PMID | 36195164 |
PQID | 2721637756 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2721637756 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2022_08_033 pubmed_primary_36195164 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_urology_2022_08_033 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | December 2022 2022-12-00 20221201 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2022 text: December 2022 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Urology |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Ghosh, Dorairajan, Kumar, Manikandan, Muruganandham, Kumar (bib0011) 2013; 81 Sarıkaya, Senocak, Sadioglu, Bozkurt (bib0014) 2021; 27 McGeorge, Chung, Desai (bib0007) 2019; 124 Ather, Zehri, Soomro, Nazir (bib0013) 2009; 181 Meechan (bib0018) 2008; 46 Ye, Rong-gui (bib0017) 2002; 60 Wong, Aboumarzouk, Narahari, O'Riordan, Pickard (bib0004) 2012; 12 Biswal, Ghosh, Bera, Pal (bib0010) 2016; 8 Gazal, Alharbi, Al‑Samadani, Kanaa (bib0020) 2015; 9 Al-Hunayan, Al-Awadi, Al-Khayyat, Abdulhalim (bib0015) 2008; 22 Uzun, Zorba, Tomak, Bostan, Kalkan (bib0009) 2012; 4 Jain, Kaza, Singh (bib0001) 2014; 6 Darlington (bib0016) 2019; 11 Kreder, Stack, Thrasher, Donatucci (bib0002) 1993; 42 Yücetürk, Yildiz, Özgür, Sunay, Doluoǧlu, Hasçiçev, Özyuvali, Ayyildiz (bib0008) 2017; 69 Das, Jana, Ghosh, Pal (bib0005) 2019; 45 Kumar, Prasad, Parmar, Ganesamoni, Batra (bib0012) 2012; 26 Goulet, Perusse, Turcotte (bib0022) 1992; 74 Altınova, Turkan (bib0003) 2007; 39 Chitre (bib0021) 2016 Gazal, Alharbi, Fareed, Omar, Alolayan, Al‑Zoubi (bib0019) 2017; 11 Munks, Alli, Goad (bib0006) 2010; 40 37192379 - J Urol. 2023 Aug;210(2):373-374. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003535 Goulet (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0022) 1992; 74 Gazal (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0019) 2017; 11 Kumar (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0012) 2012; 26 Jain (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0001) 2014; 6 Wong (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0004) 2012; 12 Das (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0005) 2019; 45 Sarıkaya (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0014) 2021; 27 Darlington (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0016) 2019; 11 Kreder (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0002) 1993; 42 McGeorge (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0007) 2019; 124 Ather (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0013) 2009; 181 Uzun (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0009) 2012; 4 Ghosh (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0011) 2013; 81 Yücetürk (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0008) 2017; 69 Meechan (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0018) 2008; 46 Chitre (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0021) 2016 Al-Hunayan (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0015) 2008; 22 Biswal (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0010) 2016; 8 Altınova (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0003) 2007; 39 Ye (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0017) 2002; 60 Gazal (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0020) 2015; 9 Munks (10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0006) 2010; 40 |
References_xml | – volume: 42 start-page: 548 year: 1993 end-page: 550 ident: bib0002 article-title: Direct vision internal urethrotomy using topical anesthesia publication-title: Urology contributor: fullname: Donatucci – volume: 11 start-page: e6043 year: 2019 ident: bib0016 article-title: A novel method of local anesthesia for optical internal urethrotomy publication-title: Cureus contributor: fullname: Darlington – volume: 9 start-page: 397‑403 year: 2015 ident: bib0020 article-title: Articaine and mepivacaine buccal infiltration in securing mandibular first molar pulp anesthesia following mepivacaine inferior alveolar nerve block: A randomized, double‑blind crossover study publication-title: Saudi J Anaesth contributor: fullname: Kanaa – volume: 39 start-page: 511 year: 2007 end-page: 512 ident: bib0003 article-title: Optical urethrotomy using topical anesthesia publication-title: Int Urol Nephrol contributor: fullname: Turkan – volume: 12 year: 2012 ident: bib0004 article-title: Simple urethral dilatation, endoscopic urethrotomy, and urethroplasty for urethral stricture disease in adult men publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev contributor: fullname: Pickard – volume: 26 start-page: 1049 year: 2012 end-page: 1052 ident: bib0012 article-title: A randomized controlled trial comparing combined spongiosum block and intraurethral lignocaine with intraurethral lignocaine alone in optical internal urethrotomy for urethral stricture publication-title: J Endourol contributor: fullname: Batra – volume: 181 start-page: 2134 year: 2009 end-page: 2138 ident: bib0013 article-title: The safety and efficacy of optical urethrotomy using a spongiosum block with sedation: a comparative nonrandomized study publication-title: J Urol contributor: fullname: Nazir – volume: 60 start-page: 245 year: 2002 end-page: 247 ident: bib0017 article-title: Optical urethrotomy for anterior urethral stricture under a new local anesthesia: intracorpus spongiosum anesthesia publication-title: Urology contributor: fullname: Rong-gui – volume: 45 start-page: 431 year: 2019 end-page: 436 ident: bib0005 article-title: A comparative study between the outcomes of visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures done under spinal anesthesia and local anesthesia publication-title: Turk J Urol contributor: fullname: Pal – volume: 22 start-page: 1017 year: 2008 end-page: 1020 ident: bib0015 article-title: A pilot study of transperineal urethrosphincteric block for visual internal urethrotomy in patients with anterior urethral strictures publication-title: J Endourol contributor: fullname: Abdulhalim – volume: 74 start-page: 692‑697 year: 1992 ident: bib0022 article-title: Contraindications to vasoconstrictors in dentistry: Part III, pharmacologic interactions publication-title: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path contributor: fullname: Turcotte – volume: 40 start-page: 31 year: 2010 end-page: 32 ident: bib0006 article-title: Optical urethrotomy under local anaesthesia is a feasible option in urethral stricture disease publication-title: Trop Doct contributor: fullname: Goad – volume: 4 start-page: 636 year: 2012 end-page: 639 ident: bib0009 article-title: Internal urethrotomy under local urethral anaesthesia is feasible with sedation and analgesia publication-title: Nephrourol Mon contributor: fullname: Kalkan – volume: 11 start-page: 152‑157 year: 2017 ident: bib0019 article-title: Comparison of onset anesthesia time and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine during teeth extractions publication-title: Saudi J Anaesth contributor: fullname: Al‑Zoubi – volume: 8 start-page: 317 year: 2016 end-page: 324 ident: bib0010 article-title: A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block vs intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures publication-title: Urol Ann contributor: fullname: Pal – volume: 27 start-page: 139 year: 2021 end-page: 145 ident: bib0014 article-title: Is combined topical-local anesthesia technique adequate for visual internal urethrotomy in the treatment of traumatic posterior urethral strictures and prostatic urethral stenoses? publication-title: Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg contributor: fullname: Bozkurt – start-page: 63‑67 year: 2016 ident: bib0021 article-title: Manual of Local Anesthesia in Dentistry contributor: fullname: Chitre – volume: 46 start-page: 56 year: 2008 end-page: 79 ident: bib0018 article-title: Intraoral topical anesthesia contributor: fullname: Meechan – volume: 69 start-page: 619 year: 2017 end-page: 625 ident: bib0008 article-title: The efficacy of intraurethral lidocaine in optical internal urethrotomy for anterior urethral stricture: a multicenter study publication-title: Minerva Urol Nefrol contributor: fullname: Ayyildiz – volume: 124 start-page: 37 year: 2019 end-page: 41 ident: bib0007 article-title: Trends in urethral stricture management over two decades publication-title: BJU Int contributor: fullname: Desai – volume: 6 start-page: 328 year: 2014 end-page: 333 ident: bib0001 article-title: Evaluation of holmium laser vs cold knife in optical internal urethrotomy for the management of short segment urethral stricture publication-title: Urol Ann contributor: fullname: Singh – volume: 81 start-page: 204 year: 2013 end-page: 207 ident: bib0011 article-title: Randomized clinical trial comparing effectiveness of intracorpus spongiosum block vstopical anesthesia for performing visual internal urethrotomy for urethral stricture disease publication-title: Urology contributor: fullname: Kumar – volume: 27 start-page: 139 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0014 article-title: Is combined topical-local anesthesia technique adequate for visual internal urethrotomy in the treatment of traumatic posterior urethral strictures and prostatic urethral stenoses? publication-title: Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg contributor: fullname: Sarıkaya – volume: 12 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0004 article-title: Simple urethral dilatation, endoscopic urethrotomy, and urethroplasty for urethral stricture disease in adult men publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev contributor: fullname: Wong – volume: 11 start-page: 152‑157 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0019 article-title: Comparison of onset anesthesia time and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine during teeth extractions publication-title: Saudi J Anaesth doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.203017 contributor: fullname: Gazal – volume: 81 start-page: 204 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0011 article-title: Randomized clinical trial comparing effectiveness of intracorpus spongiosum block vstopical anesthesia for performing visual internal urethrotomy for urethral stricture disease publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.09.020 contributor: fullname: Ghosh – volume: 74 start-page: 692‑697 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0022 article-title: Contraindications to vasoconstrictors in dentistry: Part III, pharmacologic interactions publication-title: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(92)90367-Y contributor: fullname: Goulet – volume: 42 start-page: 548 year: 1993 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0002 article-title: Direct vision internal urethrotomy using topical anesthesia publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90270-K contributor: fullname: Kreder – volume: 45 start-page: 431 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0005 article-title: A comparative study between the outcomes of visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures done under spinal anesthesia and local anesthesia publication-title: Turk J Urol doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.49354 contributor: fullname: Das – volume: 40 start-page: 31 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0006 article-title: Optical urethrotomy under local anaesthesia is a feasible option in urethral stricture disease publication-title: Trop Doct doi: 10.1258/td.2009.090121 contributor: fullname: Munks – volume: 69 start-page: 619 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0008 article-title: The efficacy of intraurethral lidocaine in optical internal urethrotomy for anterior urethral stricture: a multicenter study publication-title: Minerva Urol Nefrol contributor: fullname: Yücetürk – volume: 6 start-page: 328 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0001 article-title: Evaluation of holmium laser vs cold knife in optical internal urethrotomy for the management of short segment urethral stricture publication-title: Urol Ann doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.140997 contributor: fullname: Jain – volume: 60 start-page: 245 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0017 article-title: Optical urethrotomy for anterior urethral stricture under a new local anesthesia: intracorpus spongiosum anesthesia publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01732-6 contributor: fullname: Ye – start-page: 63‑67 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0021 contributor: fullname: Chitre – volume: 4 start-page: 636 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0009 article-title: Internal urethrotomy under local urethral anaesthesia is feasible with sedation and analgesia publication-title: Nephrourol Mon doi: 10.5812/numonthly.4524 contributor: fullname: Uzun – volume: 11 start-page: e6043 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0016 article-title: A novel method of local anesthesia for optical internal urethrotomy publication-title: Cureus contributor: fullname: Darlington – volume: 26 start-page: 1049 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0012 article-title: A randomized controlled trial comparing combined spongiosum block and intraurethral lignocaine with intraurethral lignocaine alone in optical internal urethrotomy for urethral stricture publication-title: J Endourol doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0583 contributor: fullname: Kumar – volume: 9 start-page: 397‑403 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0020 article-title: Articaine and mepivacaine buccal infiltration in securing mandibular first molar pulp anesthesia following mepivacaine inferior alveolar nerve block: A randomized, double‑blind crossover study publication-title: Saudi J Anaesth doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.159463 contributor: fullname: Gazal – volume: 181 start-page: 2134 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0013 article-title: The safety and efficacy of optical urethrotomy using a spongiosum block with sedation: a comparative nonrandomized study publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.017 contributor: fullname: Ather – volume: 39 start-page: 511 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0003 article-title: Optical urethrotomy using topical anesthesia publication-title: Int Urol Nephrol doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-9046-0 contributor: fullname: Altınova – volume: 124 start-page: 37 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0007 article-title: Trends in urethral stricture management over two decades publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.14875 contributor: fullname: McGeorge – volume: 8 start-page: 317 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0010 article-title: A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block vs intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures publication-title: Urol Ann doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.184901 contributor: fullname: Biswal – volume: 22 start-page: 1017 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0015 article-title: A pilot study of transperineal urethrosphincteric block for visual internal urethrotomy in patients with anterior urethral strictures publication-title: J Endourol doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0097 contributor: fullname: Al-Hunayan – volume: 46 start-page: 56 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033_bib0018 article-title: Intraoral topical anesthesia publication-title: Periodontology doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00231.x contributor: fullname: Meechan |
SSID | ssj0006667 |
Score | 2.446748 |
Snippet | To assess feasibility and efficacy of local topical urethral anesthesia at optical internal urethrotomy (OIU) in patients with anterior and posterior urethral... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 21 |
SubjectTerms | Ambulatory Care Facilities Anesthetics, Local Constriction, Pathologic Humans Lidocaine Pain - etiology Pain - prevention & control Prilocaine Urethral Stricture - surgery |
Title | A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Local Intraurethral Anesthetics in Optical Internal Urethrotomy at the Outpatient Clinic |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.033 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36195164 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2721637756/abstract/ |
Volume | 170 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB61WwlxQbzZAtUgcc1usnZex9VCtQXaSmhX6s2yYxu2apPVkqiCAz-B38w4doo4VEjcksiWLY8z88145jPAW5loQvU8iSypv4jboopUIXVEUKSSqea5r606PcuWa_7hIr3Yg8VQC-PSKoPu9zq919bhyzSs5nS72bga39JpUwIQvZ0r9uGAzBHnIziYn3xcnt0qZELogTozjlyHP4U808tJt-vD1-QpzmY9mSdjd5mouyBob4qOH8KDgCFx7qf5CPZM_RjunYZT8ifwa46fZa2b680Po3Hhk9Gv6HHldhsu_NWD9Rdc3TT4LtyQ0uInZ9bwxEV7u51pv-7cGKQJCSI6Lmfc1Hi-7UPfGOKIV7juGzZtc_0dZYvUFM-7NpC1oicdfQrr4_erxTIK9y5EVUJ4JLJK2ixVMZNFyTkrtJVxWTFFzqxNUyYNz8vccK6rKiutlLGNVaFm5I9aq5WS7BmM6qY2LwC55ipTOrHktnBy5ZSj19KsNDqWJLdqDJNhqcXW02uIIe_sUgTZCCcb4W7LZGwMxSAQ8dc-EWQC_tX1zSBAQf-QOxiRtWm6b2LmGIxYnqfZGJ57yd7OhpGHmZJPefj_A7-E--7NJ8G8glG768xrgjKtOoL9yc_kKGzY34el9hI |
link.rule.ids | 315,786,790,4521,24144,27955,27956,45618,45712 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9swDCa6Dth2KfZs0704YFcnTiS_jkW2It2SFhgSoDdBsqQtRWsHmY2iO-wn7DePsuQVOxQDdjNsGTJEmfxIkR8B3suxJlTPx5El9Rdxm5eRyqWOCIqUMtE887VVi9N0tuKfzpPzHZj2tTAurTLofq_TO20d7ozCao4267Wr8S2cNiUA0dm5_B7cd2jA5XUNf97meRA-D8SZceSG35bxjC6G7bYLXpOfOJl0VJ6M3WWg7gKgnSE6fgx7AUHikf_IJ7BjqqfwYBHOyJ_BryP8IitdX61_GI1Tn4p-SZdLt9dw6hsPVl9xeV3jh9AfpcG5M2p44mK97dY037ZuDtKDBBAdkzOuKzzbdIFvDFHES1x1A-umvrpB2SANxbO2CVSt6ClHn8Pq-ONyOotC14WoHBMaiaySNk1UzGRecM5ybWVclEyRK2uThEnDsyIznOuyTAsrZWxjlasJeaPWaqUkewG7VV2ZA0CuuUqVHltyWjg5csqRa2lWGB1Lklo5gGG_1GLjyTVEn3V2IYJshJONcL0yGRtA3gtE_LVLBBmAf736rhegoD_IHYvIytTtdzFx_EUsy5J0APtesn--hpF_mZBHefj_E7-Fh7PlYi7mJ6efX8Ij98Snw7yC3WbbmtcEahr1ptu0vwG-Bvbn |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Randomized+Controlled+Trial+Comparing+Two+Different+Local+Intraurethral+Anesthetics+in+Optical+Internal+Urethrotomy+at+the+Outpatient+Clinic&rft.jtitle=Urology+%28Ridgewood%2C+N.J.%29&rft.au=Erg%C3%BCn%2C+Osman&rft.au=%C3%96zt%C3%BCrk%2C+Sefa+Alperen&rft.au=Aydemir%2C+Sabri&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.issn=1527-9995&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft.volume=170&rft.spage=21&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.urology.2022.08.033&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0090-4295&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0090-4295&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0090-4295&client=summon |