FISCAL PENAL LIABILITY OF A FENCE UNDER ART. 65 OF THE PENAL CODE FOR FAILURE TO REPORT THE SUBJECT OF TAXATION (ARTICLE 54 OF THE PENAL CODE)
The article presents an issue related to the criminal legal evaluation of the behavior of a perpetrator who evades taxation of goods of which he has become the disposer in connection with a fiscal offense or crime. Attention was paid to the differences in positions on the issue of incurring criminal...
Saved in:
Published in | Probacja Vol. 3; pp. 55 - 73 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English Polish |
Published |
Ministry of Justice (Poland)
25.09.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The article presents an issue related to the criminal legal evaluation of the behavior of a perpetrator who evades taxation of goods of which he has become the disposer in connection with a fiscal offense or crime. Attention was paid to the differences in positions on the issue of incurring criminal liability by a fence under the Fiscal Penal Code (Article 65 of the Fiscal Penal Code), who fails to disclose the object of taxation exposing himself additionally to liability for the second act - under Article 54 of the Fiscal Penal Code. Guided by pragmatic considerations, but based on systemic assumptions, including the right to defense and the absence of an obligation to provide evidence to one’s detriment, it was considered counterproductive to hold a perpetrator of excise fencing additionally liable for failure to disclose the object of taxation in the absence of realization of the elements of the subjective side, and often also the elements of the object side of the criminal act under Article 54 of the Fiscal Penal Code. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The article presents an issue related to the criminal legal evaluation of the behavior of a perpetrator who evades taxation of goods of which he has become the disposer in connection with a fiscal offense or crime. Attention was paid to the differences in positions on the issue of incurring criminal liability by a fence under the Fiscal Penal Code (Article 65 of the Fiscal Penal Code), who fails to disclose the object of taxation exposing himself additionally to liability for the second act - under Article 54 of the Fiscal Penal Code. Guided by pragmatic considerations, but based on systemic assumptions, including the right to defense and the absence of an obligation to provide evidence to one’s detriment, it was considered counterproductive to hold a perpetrator of excise fencing additionally liable for failure to disclose the object of taxation in the absence of realization of the elements of the subjective side, and often also the elements of the object side of the criminal act under Article 54 of the Fiscal Penal Code. |
Author | Błoński, Michał |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Michał orcidid: 0000-0001-8549-3657 surname: Błoński fullname: Błoński, Michał |
BookMark | eNplkc1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANx8hEOK1_FPcwzBAaOoqdJUgpPlODYqAoISLrwEz0xSEBcus9Ls7KeV5gQdvnVvHqFzIAsuCLsisIjJKIRwtpBA2QGaUQlJFAM8HKIZiGUSCaD0GJ0Nw64hjEkupFjO0FeuN1la4LVajVro9FoXun7EZY5TnKtVpvB2daMqnFb1Ags-Leo79ZvPyhuF87LCeaqLbaVwXeJKrcuq3oc22-t7ldX7m_QhrXW5whcjSGeFwpz9Z12eoqNgXwZ_9jvnaJurOruLivJWj39GDjiwSFDrGPUtbaxvfFjK1nKRNLJN4hiS0WqdACc9tBaCtBI8dS21PAnMMxJcPEf6h9t29tm897tX23-azu7M3uj6J2P7j5178UZQiB1fkgZsyxJGExG8aCywJjhugxxZ8MNyfTcMvQ9_PCBm6scQMFM_ZurHTP3E36_feAk |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION DOA |
DOI | 10.5604/01.3001.0054.7124 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Law |
EISSN | 2719-311X |
EndPage | 73 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_6213c580b1ad494296fe6ba14bfc5af7 10_5604_01_3001_0054_7124 |
GroupedDBID | AAYXX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ Y2W M~E |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1514-62ac42ed2baebef87da569b7d93319ebedc61c7e1da1f7a71e2cd2a59f4e40fc3 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1689-6122 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:31:39 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:41:03 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Language | English Polish |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1514-62ac42ed2baebef87da569b7d93319ebedc61c7e1da1f7a71e2cd2a59f4e40fc3 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-8549-3657 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/6213c580b1ad494296fe6ba14bfc5af7 |
PageCount | 19 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6213c580b1ad494296fe6ba14bfc5af7 crossref_primary_10_5604_01_3001_0054_7124 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-9-25 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-09-25 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2024 text: 2024-9-25 day: 25 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Probacja |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | Ministry of Justice (Poland) |
Publisher_xml | – name: Ministry of Justice (Poland) |
References | 624025r31 624025r30 624025r11 624025r33 624025r10 624025r32 624025r13 624025r35 624025r12 624025r34 624025r15 624025r37 624025r14 624025r36 624025r17 624025r39 624025r16 624025r38 624025r19 624025r18 624025r6 624025r5 624025r4 624025r3 624025r2 624025r1 624025r40 624025r20 624025r42 624025r41 624025r22 624025r44 624025r21 624025r43 624025r24 624025r46 624025r23 624025r45 624025r26 624025r25 624025r28 624025r9 624025r27 624025r8 624025r7 624025r29 |
References_xml | – ident: 624025r34 – ident: 624025r11 – ident: 624025r32 – ident: 624025r8 – ident: 624025r36 – ident: 624025r38 – ident: 624025r28 – ident: 624025r6 – ident: 624025r42 – ident: 624025r40 – ident: 624025r22 – ident: 624025r24 – ident: 624025r18 – ident: 624025r26 – ident: 624025r43 – ident: 624025r4 – ident: 624025r45 – ident: 624025r2 – ident: 624025r16 – ident: 624025r14 – ident: 624025r31 – ident: 624025r10 – ident: 624025r35 – ident: 624025r12 – ident: 624025r33 – ident: 624025r9 – ident: 624025r37 – ident: 624025r29 – ident: 624025r39 – ident: 624025r41 – ident: 624025r5 – ident: 624025r27 – ident: 624025r7 – ident: 624025r20 – ident: 624025r46 – ident: 624025r21 – ident: 624025r23 – ident: 624025r3 – ident: 624025r25 – ident: 624025r19 – ident: 624025r44 – ident: 624025r1 – ident: 624025r17 – ident: 624025r30 – ident: 624025r15 – ident: 624025r13 |
SSID | ssib044756768 ssj0002891451 |
Score | 2.2705688 |
Snippet | The article presents an issue related to the criminal legal evaluation of the behavior of a perpetrator who evades taxation of goods of which he has become the... |
SourceID | doaj crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Index Database |
StartPage | 55 |
SubjectTerms | criminal responsibility penal fincal code tax evasion taxpaier |
Title | FISCAL PENAL LIABILITY OF A FENCE UNDER ART. 65 OF THE PENAL CODE FOR FAILURE TO REPORT THE SUBJECT OF TAXATION (ARTICLE 54 OF THE PENAL CODE) |
URI | https://doaj.org/article/6213c580b1ad494296fe6ba14bfc5af7 |
Volume | 3 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1JT9wwFLYQJy5VEVRsRT700FbKEDvecgzTRJNqYNCQkYZT5PWEBlTRa38Cv5lnJ1SDeuDSiw-O8xR9z3mLl-8h9MXk3Cvt88wZX2axonFWKisyJgpdcKWMSVRKV9ditmI_13y9Veorngkb6IEH4C4EJYXlKjdEO1aC9RTBC6MJM8FyHdI9cvB5W8kUzKTIYifkcA9OqBLyI0qHLU1w8OwiJ5Mij2SdEK9MJKHsjVPa4u5PTqb5iD6M0SGuhq_aRzuP9wfouWlvp9Uc39TX0ELufdnO2-4OLxpc4SYuEeF0VQBDbDrBgscH3awex08XP2oMqR5uqna-Wta4W-BlfbNYdmnQWPAkvVOt04IV_gqC2um8xpz9K-vbIVo1dTedZWMZhcyCO2eZoNoy6h01GjQWlHSai9JIVxbw_0GXs4JY6YnTJEgtiafWUc3LwDzLgy0-od3Nw8YfIWyl5YGDTaBMMQ1KsdQxx1Vw0jGwmsfo-yuO_ePAltFDlhFB73PSR9D7CHofQT9GlxHpvwMj0XXqAPX3o_r799R_8j-EnKI9CrFKPAZC-Rnaffr123-GWOPJnKdpBe3Vn_oFeefC9Q |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FISCAL+PENAL+LIABILITY+OF+A+FENCE+UNDER+ART.+65+OF+THE+PENAL+CODE+FOR+FAILURE+TO+REPORT+THE+SUBJECT+OF+TAXATION+%28ARTICLE+54+OF+THE+PENAL+CODE%29&rft.jtitle=Probacja&rft.au=Micha%C5%82+B%C5%82o%C5%84ski&rft.date=2024-09-25&rft.pub=Ministry+of+Justice+%28Poland%29&rft.issn=1689-6122&rft.volume=3&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=73&rft_id=info:doi/10.5604%2F01.3001.0054.7124&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_6213c580b1ad494296fe6ba14bfc5af7 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1689-6122&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1689-6122&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1689-6122&client=summon |