From antiferromagnetic and hidden order to Pauli paramagnetism in U M 2 Si 2 compounds with 5 f electron duality
The interplay of band-formation and electron-correlation effects in uranium heavy fermion compounds is the subject of an ongoing debate. Here unexpected insight has been gained from advanced spectroscopies on isostructural members of the U M 2 S i 2 family with different properties. The antiferromag...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 117; no. 48; pp. 30220 - 30227 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.12.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The interplay of band-formation and electron-correlation effects in uranium heavy fermion compounds is the subject of an ongoing debate. Here unexpected insight has been gained from advanced spectroscopies on isostructural members of the U
M
2
S
i
2
family with different properties. The antiferromagnetic (
M
= Pd,Ni), hidden order (
M
= Ru), and Pauli-paramagnetic (
M
= Fe) compounds all exhibit atomic-like U 5
f
2
multiplet states with singlet–singlet (quasi-doublet) symmetry while the U 5
f
3
weight increases from Pd
→
Ni
→
Ru
→
Fe, indicating increasing itineracy. This reveals the dual nature of the U-5
f
electrons throughout the family; the local aspects persist in the hidden-order compound
U
R
u
2
S
i
2
and surprisingly even in the highly itinerant Pauli paramagnet
U
F
e
2
S
i
2
. This study gives guidelines for the theoretical treatment of U intermetallic systems.
Using inelastic X-ray scattering beyond the dipole limit and hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy we establish the dual nature of the U
5
f
electrons in U
M
2
S
i
2
(
M
= Pd, Ni, Ru, Fe), regardless of their degree of delocalization. We have observed that the compounds have in common a local atomic-like state that is well described by the U
5
f
2
configuration with the
Γ
1
(
1
)
and
Γ
2
quasi-doublet symmetry. The amount of the U 5
f
3
configuration, however, varies considerably across the U
M
2
S
i
2
series, indicating an increase of U 5
f
itineracy in going from
M
= Pd to Ni to Ru and to the Fe compound. The identified electronic states explain the formation of the very large ordered magnetic moments in
U
P
d
2
S
i
2
and
U
N
i
2
S
i
2
, the availability of orbital degrees of freedom needed for the hidden order in
U
R
u
2
S
i
2
to occur, as well as the appearance of Pauli paramagnetism in
U
F
e
2
S
i
2
. A unified and systematic picture of the U
M
2
S
i
2
compounds may now be drawn, thereby providing suggestions for additional experiments to induce hidden order and/or superconductivity in U compounds with the tetragonal body-centered
T
h
C
r
2
S
i
2
structure. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.2005701117 |