Incision choice for cesarean delivery in obese patients: experience in a university hospital
Objective: Cesarean deliveries in obese patients are surgically difficult and associated with a higher incidence of complications. The choices of skin or uterine incision are subjective. Our aim was to determine the impact of different incisions on the speed of the operation and the intraoperative a...
Saved in:
Published in | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) Vol. 97; no. 4; pp. S62 - S63 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Inc
01.05.2001
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objective: Cesarean deliveries in obese patients are surgically difficult and associated with a higher incidence of complications. The choices of skin or uterine incision are subjective. Our aim was to determine the impact of different incisions on the speed of the operation and the intraoperative and postoperative morbidity in obese patients.
Methods: We conducted a 14-month retrospective review of all primary singleton cesarean deliveries performed at our institution. The abdominal (vertical: V, or Pfannenstiel: P) and uterine incision (low transverse: L, or classical: C) were evaluated by one-way and two-way ANOVA for their impact on the time of delivery (skin–baby) based on maternal weight in obese (>200 lb) versus nonobese women. Measures of intraoperative and postoperative morbidity included EBL, wound infections, and metritis.
Results: Seventy-one patients were subjects of this study. Forty-five patients (63%) met criteria for obesity (265.1 ± 8.4 lbs), significantly different from nonobese patients (156.5 ± 4.1 lbs). PL was the most frequent association both in the obese (64%, n = 29) and nonobese (88%, n = 23), with an average skin–baby time of 9.4 ± 0.8 minutes and 9.9 ± 1.1minutes, respectively (
P < 0.05). In both obese and nonobese patients, a C was associated with a higher rate of prematurity and NICU admission. When a C was performed, the time was longer if the patient was obese (16.4 ± 2.8 min) versus nonobese (9.07 + 1.2 min),
P = 0.03). Skin incisions did not affect the speed of delivery. In obese patients, VL had the highest EBL (1,167 ± 3.57 cc) and PL the lowest (1,075 ± 5.1cc,
P = 0.02), both increased compared with nonobese patients with similar incisions. Metritis, but not wound infection, was more frequent in obese patients (20%) versus nonobese patients (3%), irrespective of the incision type. Length of stay was not affected either by obesity or by incision type.
Conclusions: The combination of P and L is preferred for cesarean delivery in both obese and nonobese patients. For obese patients, PL is further advantageous because it improves speed of operation, blood loss, and rate of complications. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objective: Cesarean deliveries in obese patients are surgically difficult and associated with a higher incidence of complications. The choices of skin or uterine incision are subjective. Our aim was to determine the impact of different incisions on the speed of the operation and the intraoperative and postoperative morbidity in obese patients.
Methods: We conducted a 14-month retrospective review of all primary singleton cesarean deliveries performed at our institution. The abdominal (vertical: V, or Pfannenstiel: P) and uterine incision (low transverse: L, or classical: C) were evaluated by one-way and two-way ANOVA for their impact on the time of delivery (skin–baby) based on maternal weight in obese (>200 lb) versus nonobese women. Measures of intraoperative and postoperative morbidity included EBL, wound infections, and metritis.
Results: Seventy-one patients were subjects of this study. Forty-five patients (63%) met criteria for obesity (265.1 ± 8.4 lbs), significantly different from nonobese patients (156.5 ± 4.1 lbs). PL was the most frequent association both in the obese (64%, n = 29) and nonobese (88%, n = 23), with an average skin–baby time of 9.4 ± 0.8 minutes and 9.9 ± 1.1minutes, respectively (
P < 0.05). In both obese and nonobese patients, a C was associated with a higher rate of prematurity and NICU admission. When a C was performed, the time was longer if the patient was obese (16.4 ± 2.8 min) versus nonobese (9.07 + 1.2 min),
P = 0.03). Skin incisions did not affect the speed of delivery. In obese patients, VL had the highest EBL (1,167 ± 3.57 cc) and PL the lowest (1,075 ± 5.1cc,
P = 0.02), both increased compared with nonobese patients with similar incisions. Metritis, but not wound infection, was more frequent in obese patients (20%) versus nonobese patients (3%), irrespective of the incision type. Length of stay was not affected either by obesity or by incision type.
Conclusions: The combination of P and L is preferred for cesarean delivery in both obese and nonobese patients. For obese patients, PL is further advantageous because it improves speed of operation, blood loss, and rate of complications. |
Author | D’ Heureux-Jones, Anne Marie Kopelman, J. Anderson, E. Malinow, A. Buhimschi, C.S. |
AuthorAffiliation | University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Anne Marie surname: D’ Heureux-Jones fullname: D’ Heureux-Jones, Anne Marie – sequence: 2 givenname: C.S. surname: Buhimschi fullname: Buhimschi, C.S. – sequence: 3 givenname: E. surname: Anderson fullname: Anderson, E. – sequence: 4 givenname: J. surname: Kopelman fullname: Kopelman, J. – sequence: 5 givenname: A. surname: Malinow fullname: Malinow, A. |
BookMark | eNqFkE1LAzEQhoNUsFZ_gpCjHlYnyX7Fi0jxo1DwoIIHIaTZWTa6bpZk29p_b9qKVw8hgZkn885zTEad65CQMwaXDFh-9QzAZVKUaXoO7AIYl1kiD8iYlYVIuBBvIzL-azkixyF8AERQijF5n3XGBus6ahpnDdLaeWowaI-6oxW2doV-Q21H3QID0l4PFrshXFP87tHHd2RiVdNlt20NdtjQxoXeDro9IYe1bgOe_t4T8np_9zJ9TOZPD7Pp7TwxLI0Rc2QVz_K6NrrkkhmxKEwKINIKjdRcY8oQMmCmLA3HrJS1KViBXPOi0BlUYkKy_b_GuxA81qr39kv7jWKgtorUTpHa7q-AqZ0iJSOX7rm1a4eY_bNdrtGrBnU7NCo6gpxnkPAoC2IglsSTiYjd7DGMO61sJILZiaisRzOoytl_Bv8AyRqAqw |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2001 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2001 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01295-9 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1873-233X |
EndPage | S63 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_S0029_7844_01_01295_9 00006250-200104001-00153 S0029784401012959 |
GroupedDBID | --- --K .3C .55 .GJ .XZ .Z2 01R 0R~ 123 1B1 1CY 1J1 1~5 29N 2CO 354 3O- 4.4 40H 4G. 4Q1 4Q2 4Q3 53G 5RE 5VS 7-5 77Y 7O~ 85S AAAXR AACTN AAEDT AAGIX AAHPQ AAJCS AALRI AAMOA AAMTA AAQFI AAQKA AAQQT AAQXK AARTV AASCR AASOK AASXQ AAUEB AAWTL AAXQO AAXUO ABASU ABBUW ABDIG ABJNI ABMAC ABVCZ ABXVJ ABZAD ACCJW ACDDN ACEWG ACGFO ACGFS ACILI ACIUM ACOAL ACWDW ACWRI ACXNZ ADBBV ADFPA ADGGA ADHPY ADMUD ADNKB AE3 AEBDS AEETU AENEX AFDTB AFEXH AFFNX AFSOK AFTJW AFUWQ AGINI AGNAY AHOMT AHPSJ AHRYX AHVBC AIJEX AINUH AJIOK AJNWD AJNYG AKULP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AOHHW AWKKM BAWUL BOYCO BQLVK BS7 BYPQX C45 CS3 DIWNM DU5 DUNZO E.X EBS EEVPB EJD ERAAH EX3 F2K F2L F2M F2N F5P FCALG FD6 FDB FEDTE FGOYB FL- FW0 G8K GNXGY GQDEL H0~ HLJTE HVGLF HZ~ IHE IKREB IKYAY IN~ IPNFZ JF9 JG8 JK3 JK8 K-A K-F K8S KD2 KMI L-C L7B M18 M41 MZP N4W N9A NEJ NQ- N~7 N~B N~M O9- OAG OAH OBH OCUKA ODA ODMTH OHH OHT OHYEH OJAPA OL1 OLB OLG OLH OLU OLV OLW OLY OLZ OPUJH ORVUJ OUVQU OVD OVDNE OVIDH OVLEI OVOZU OWBYB OWU OWV OWX OWY OWZ OXXIT P-K P2P R2- R58 RIG RLZ ROL RPZ S4R S4S SSZ TEORI TSPGW TWZ UHB V2I VVN W3M WH7 WOQ WOW X3V X3W X7M XPP XXN XYM YQJ ZA5 ZB8 ZGI ZXP ZZMQN ~S- - 08R 0R 55 7O AAPBV ABFLS ABPTK AFRUD AHULI AJYGW AQIPR ASCII GJ H0 HZ IN K OHASI OHM RSW S- STF UNR XZ Z2 AAAAV AAIQE AAYXX ACXJB AHQNM AJZMW AKRWK CITATION |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1473-6e1d256ffca8291c3b7c40034dec9a2ae41e0501c88c2e589fc717e2a277a50d3 |
ISSN | 0029-7844 |
IngestDate | Fri Aug 23 02:30:01 EDT 2024 Thu Aug 13 19:47:28 EDT 2020 Fri Feb 23 02:18:38 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1473-6e1d256ffca8291c3b7c40034dec9a2ae41e0501c88c2e589fc717e2a277a50d3 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1016_S0029_7844_01_01295_9 wolterskluwer_health_00006250-200104001-00153 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_S0029_7844_01_01295_9 |
ProviderPackageCode | OVOZU L-C C45 7O~ AARTV ADFPA OLH ASCII BYPQX OLG AAMOA ODA OHH ABZAD ABBUW JK3 ADNKB JK8 H0~ 1J1 OLV OLU JG8 OLW OLZ OLY F2K F2M F2L F2N OHASI AHVBC AJNYG FL- KMI K8S OVLEI AJIOK OPUJH V2I .XZ S4R S4S 4Q1 DUNZO OAG 4Q2 OVDNE 4Q3 AMJPA OAH OVD AHULI ACEWG .Z2 N~7 IKYAY OVIDH AWKKM 40H N~B OBH OUVQU ORVUJ X3V X3W ACDDN ACWRI BOYCO AIJEX AAXQO AAMTA AAAXR OWU E.X OCUKA OWV OWY 01R ACXNZ OWX OWZ OL1 ABXVJ IN~ KD2 OXXIT 77Y ACWDW JF9 FW0 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2001-05-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2001-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2001 text: 2001-05-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationTitle | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) |
PublicationYear | 2001 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc – name: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists |
SSID | ssj0001693 |
Score | 1.6658247 |
Snippet | Objective: Cesarean deliveries in obese patients are surgically difficult and associated with a higher incidence of complications. The choices of skin or... |
SourceID | crossref wolterskluwer elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | S62 |
Title | Incision choice for cesarean delivery in obese patients: experience in a university hospital |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01295-9 http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00006250-200104001-00153 |
Volume | 97 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9QwELaWVkJIqCqXWkqRH3gArbLESZzEvK04tFAVJNqKPiAsXwEEStF2I45fzzi24xSVo7xEOZSRlfk8nnG-mUHoHiwSpNRaJllZQ4AiCU2koBC4sko1ZSlKQmyC8_7LcnFUvDimx5PJuxFrqVvJmfpxbl7J_2gV7oFebZbsBTQ7CIUbcA76hSNoGI7_pOPnrWuQMwUbBhO-pwzCvBdLu72uzWfLuejz-k6kOTWhhmpPgjNDiWP7XEy7SND44FuJjP3WVxLQYIv5u5LO77-3RrnqTaNuPrOp_Vs22lt4YhkaC9MtTfctGboCzM_sNJDI6xuY_yypalevMVhPx671KKEjU3jgrazxV_m5BtvtHRwMomHQtnUAs_tjNGFxlQp_5n9ZvAZKYWSrgShuRfGU8F4MZ5fQelYxCsH5-nzv9Zu9Ya22pWgCCci-E3O8HsYx3U_JAz-e33kvV7-eWHLD6ac-t2HkoRxuog0fWuC5w8k1NDHtdXR535MnbqC3AS7YwQUDXHCACw5wwR9b3MMFB7g8whEs9qnAESw4gOUmOnr29PDxIvHNNRJFiipPSkM0uLtNo0SdMaJyWanCVivSRjGRCVMQk9KUqLpWmaE1axRE_iYTWVUJmur8FlprAThbCFMJM56lpZJZUxQ5SCpIXWkNnidtdC620Sx8NP7F1VDhf1TXNqrDp-XeEXQOHgfY_O3V5IwquEsn5r1fBu6-tR_ELlyAbvCE89sXHdsOuhLnxh20tlp2Zhf80pW868H1E7K5g30 |
link.rule.ids | 315,786,790,27957,27958 |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incision+choice+for+cesarean+delivery+in+obese+patients%3A+experience+in+a+university+hospital&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics+and+gynecology+%28New+York.+1953%29&rft.au=D%27+Heureux-Jones%2C+A&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.issn=0029-7844&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=S62&rft.epage=S63&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2FS0029-7844%2801%2901295-9&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_S0029_7844_01_01295_9 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0029-7844&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0029-7844&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0029-7844&client=summon |