Credere i kredit dva srodna ili suprotstavljena pojma?
Proučavajući ugovore o kreditu osigurane stvarnopravnim osiguranjima, a koji se u praksi većinom sklapaju u potrošačkim odnosno B2C odnosima, autorice u radu dolaze do spoznaja o mnogobrojnim problemima u hrvatskoj sudskoj praksi, ali i zakonodavstvu. Isti su primarno posljedica kompleksnog pro...
Saved in:
Published in | Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci Vol. 37; no. 1; pp. 317 - 365 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article Paper |
Language | English Croatian German |
Published |
Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci
01.01.2016
University of Rijeka, Faculty of Law |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Proučavajući ugovore o kreditu osigurane stvarnopravnim osiguranjima, a koji se u praksi većinom sklapaju u potrošačkim odnosno B2C odnosima, autorice u radu dolaze do spoznaja o mnogobrojnim problemima u hrvatskoj sudskoj praksi, ali i zakonodavstvu. Isti su primarno posljedica kompleksnog procesa usklađivanja izvornih nacionalnih odredaba s europskim acquisom u tom području, a koji pored ispravnog preuzimanja EU propisa u nacionalno zakonodavstvo zahtijeva i ispravnu primjenu
i ujednačeno tumačenje harmo- niziranog nacionalnog prava sukladno istima. U tom smislu, poteškoće nastu- paju već samim određenjem ugovornih strana, odnosno glede pitanja tko je potrošač, a tko trgovac odnosno vjerovnik u B2C ugovorima o kreditu. Isti se nastavljaju u određenju predmeta ugovora, odnosno pronalaženju odgovora na pitanje, što je potrošački kredit te na kreditiranje čega se on točno odnosi. Nejasnoće postoje i o pitanju određenja bitnih sastojaka ugovora o potrošačkom kreditu, glede kojih jasne odgovore ne daje ni praksa Suda EU-a, niti domaća sudska praksa. Problemi postoje i u razumijevanju same dužnosti sudova i drugih primjenjivača prava o
tumačenju i primjeni pozitivnoga nacionalnog prava sukladno acquisu odnosno u
načinu provedbe iste dužnosti u praksi. Sva navedena pitanja dodatno se
usložnjavaju kada su tražbine takvih kredita stvarnopravno osigurane.
Imajući u vidu osobite poteškoće u tumačenju i praktičnoj primjeni
harmoniziranih nacionalnih odredaba koje se odnose na potrošačko kreditiranje
i pravo potrošača općenito, autorice u radu nastoje dati jasne i koncizne
odgovore na brojna ključna pitanja o kojima ovisi ispravna primjena spomenutog
zakonodavstva.
By studying credit contracts secured by
real securities, which are, in practice, usually concluded as consumer, i.e.
B2C contracts, the authors have become aware of numerous issues in the Croatian
judicial practice and legislation. These are primarily a consequence of the
complex process of approximation of original national provisions to the
European acquis in this area that apart from requiring correct transposition of
EU legal acts into the national legislation, also demand the correct
application and uniform interpretation of harmonized national law. In that
sense, issues arise already when determining the contracting parties, i.e.
regarding the questions: who is the consumer and who the trader, i.e. creditor,
in B2C credit contracts? There is also the topic of the determination of the
object of the contract, i.e. with regard to answering the questions of what is
a consumer credit and the crediting of what exactly it relates to. Ambiguities
exist also relating to the determination of essential elements of consumer
credit contracts, with regard to which there are no clear answers coming either
from the practice of the CJEU, or from the domestic court practice. Problems
exist regarding the understanding of the duty of courts and other applicants of
law about the interpretation and application of positive national law
consistently to the acquis, i.e. regarding the manner of pursuing this duty in
practice. All the above-mentioned questions become even more complicated, when
it comes to credits, whose main claims are secured by a real security.
Therefore, bearing in mind the particular difficulties in the interpretation
and practical application of harmonized national provisions on consumer
crediting and consumer law in general, in this paper the authors try to offer
clear and concise answers to numerous key questions upon which the correct
application of the previously mentioned legislation depends. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Proučavajući ugovore o kreditu osigurane stvarnopravnim osiguranjima, a koji se u praksi većinom sklapaju u potrošačkim odnosno B2C odnosima, autorice u radu dolaze do spoznaja o mnogobrojnim problemima u hrvatskoj sudskoj praksi, ali i zakonodavstvu. Isti su primarno posljedica kompleksnog procesa usklađivanja izvornih nacionalnih odredaba s europskim acquisom u tom području, a koji pored ispravnog preuzimanja EU propisa u nacionalno zakonodavstvo zahtijeva i ispravnu primjenu i ujednačeno tumačenje harmo- niziranog nacionalnog prava sukladno istima. U tom smislu, poteškoće nastu- paju već samim određenjem ugovornih strana, odnosno glede pitanja tko je potrošač, a tko trgovac odnosno vjerovnik u B2C ugovorima o kreditu. Isti se nastavljaju u određenju predmeta ugovora, odnosno pronalaženju odgovora na pitanje, što je potrošački kredit te na kreditiranje čega se on točno odnosi. Nejasnoće postoje i o pitanju određenja bitnih sastojaka ugovora o potrošačkom kreditu, glede kojih jasne odgovore ne daje ni praksa Suda EU-a, niti domaća sudska praksa. Problemi postoje i u razumijevanju same dužnosti sudova i drugih primjenjivača prava o tumačenju i primjeni pozitivnoga nacionalnog prava sukladno acquisu odnosno u načinu provedbe iste dužnosti u praksi. Sva navedena pitanja dodatno se usložnjavaju kada su tražbine takvih kredita stvarnopravno osigurane. Imajući u vidu osobite poteškoće u tumačenju i praktičnoj primjeni harmoniziranih nacionalnih odredaba koje se odnose na potrošačko kreditiranje i pravo potrošača općenito, autorice u radu nastoje dati jasne i koncizne odgovore na brojna ključna pitanja o kojima ovisi ispravna primjena spomenutog zakonodavstva. Proučavajući ugovore o kreditu osigurane stvarnopravnim osiguranjima, a koji se u praksi većinom sklapaju u potrošačkim odnosno B2C odnosima, autorice u radu dolaze do spoznaja o mnogobrojnim problemima u hrvatskoj sudskoj praksi, ali i zakonodavstvu. Isti su primarno posljedica kompleksnog procesa usklađivanja izvornih nacionalnih odredaba s europskim acquisom u tom području, a koji pored ispravnog preuzimanja EU propisa u nacionalno zakonodavstvo zahtijeva i ispravnu primjenu i ujednačeno tumačenje harmo- niziranog nacionalnog prava sukladno istima. U tom smislu, poteškoće nastu- paju već samim određenjem ugovornih strana, odnosno glede pitanja tko je potrošač, a tko trgovac odnosno vjerovnik u B2C ugovorima o kreditu. Isti se nastavljaju u određenju predmeta ugovora, odnosno pronalaženju odgovora na pitanje, što je potrošački kredit te na kreditiranje čega se on točno odnosi. Nejasnoće postoje i o pitanju određenja bitnih sastojaka ugovora o potrošačkom kreditu, glede kojih jasne odgovore ne daje ni praksa Suda EU-a, niti domaća sudska praksa. Problemi postoje i u razumijevanju same dužnosti sudova i drugih primjenjivača prava o tumačenju i primjeni pozitivnoga nacionalnog prava sukladno acquisu odnosno u načinu provedbe iste dužnosti u praksi. Sva navedena pitanja dodatno se usložnjavaju kada su tražbine takvih kredita stvarnopravno osigurane. Imajući u vidu osobite poteškoće u tumačenju i praktičnoj primjeni harmoniziranih nacionalnih odredaba koje se odnose na potrošačko kreditiranje i pravo potrošača općenito, autorice u radu nastoje dati jasne i koncizne odgovore na brojna ključna pitanja o kojima ovisi ispravna primjena spomenutog zakonodavstva. By studying credit contracts secured by real securities, which are, in practice, usually concluded as consumer, i.e. B2C contracts, the authors have become aware of numerous issues in the Croatian judicial practice and legislation. These are primarily a consequence of the complex process of approximation of original national provisions to the European acquis in this area that apart from requiring correct transposition of EU legal acts into the national legislation, also demand the correct application and uniform interpretation of harmonized national law. In that sense, issues arise already when determining the contracting parties, i.e. regarding the questions: who is the consumer and who the trader, i.e. creditor, in B2C credit contracts? There is also the topic of the determination of the object of the contract, i.e. with regard to answering the questions of what is a consumer credit and the crediting of what exactly it relates to. Ambiguities exist also relating to the determination of essential elements of consumer credit contracts, with regard to which there are no clear answers coming either from the practice of the CJEU, or from the domestic court practice. Problems exist regarding the understanding of the duty of courts and other applicants of law about the interpretation and application of positive national law consistently to the acquis, i.e. regarding the manner of pursuing this duty in practice. All the above-mentioned questions become even more complicated, when it comes to credits, whose main claims are secured by a real security. Therefore, bearing in mind the particular difficulties in the interpretation and practical application of harmonized national provisions on consumer crediting and consumer law in general, in this paper the authors try to offer clear and concise answers to numerous key questions upon which the correct application of the previously mentioned legislation depends. |
Abstract_FL | By studying credit contracts secured by real securities, which are, in practice, usually concluded as consumer, i.e. B2C contracts, the authors have become aware of numerous issues in the Croatian judicial practice and legislation. These are primarily a consequence of the complex process of approximation of original national provisions to the European acquis in this area that apart from requiring correct transposition of EU legal acts into the national legislation, also demand the correct application and uniform interpretation of harmonized national law. In that sense, issues arise already when determining the contracting parties, i.e. regarding the questions: who is the consumer and who the trader, i.e. creditor, in B2C credit contracts? There is also the topic of the determination of the object of the contract, i.e. with regard to answering the questions of what is a consumer credit and the crediting of what exactly it relates to. Ambiguities exist also relating to the determination of essential elements of consumer credit contracts, with regard to which there are no clear answers coming either from the practice of the CJEU, or from the domestic court practice. Problems exist regarding the understanding of the duty of courts and other applicants of law about the interpretation and application of positive national law consistently to the acquis, i.e. regarding the manner of pursuing this duty in practice. All the above-mentioned questions become even more complicated, when it comes to credits, whose main claims are secured by a real security. Therefore, bearing in mind the particular difficulties in the interpretation and practical application of harmonized national provisions on consumer crediting and consumer law in general, in this paper the authors try to offer clear and concise answers to numerous key questions upon which the correct application of the previously mentioned legislation depends. |
Author | Mišćenić, Emilia Mihelčić, Gabrijela |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Gabrijela surname: Mihelčić fullname: Mihelčić, Gabrijela organization: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci – sequence: 2 givenname: Emilia surname: Mišćenić fullname: Mišćenić, Emilia organization: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci |
BookMark | eNpVkE9LAzEQxYNUsNaCJ8_9ArvOZJLN7FGKfwoFLwreQjab6La1W5Je9NO7dEVwLu_xePM7vEsx2ff7IMQNQklQS337fYg5lWRKLFGeiSmyqgomVJPBE0FBqn67EPOcNzCcZpCop-J6mUIbUlh0i-3guuOVOI9ul8P8V2fi9eH-ZflUrJ8fV8u7deFRUV0EYC2bCMwMBpVC3VKtmaX3PkbTqthICKaBVkcTgZi9dIBSYtVS1QDNxGrktr3b2EPqPl36sr3r7Cno07t16dj5XbDRow4GVC1bpbzRTjfsWVPwrMA1cmAVI-sjebf9BxuTnHwYrMUKKl0P_XLs-9TnnEL8e0GwpzntaU5LxqJFST-LOWgC |
ContentType | Journal Article Paper |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION VP8 DOA |
DOI | 10.30925/zpfsr.37.1.12 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Hrcak: Portal of scientific journals of Croatia DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ : Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Law |
DocumentTitle_FL | CREDERE AND CREDIT: TWO COMPLEMENTARY OR CONTRADICTORY NOTIONS? |
EISSN | 1846-8314 |
EndPage | 365 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_fc15e70492d44c75a5b8c853ec840ab2 oai_hrcak_srce_hr_160659 10_30925_zpfsr_37_1_12 |
GroupedDBID | AAYXX ADBBV ADUOI ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BCNDV CITATION E3Z GCT GROUPED_DOAJ HCSNT HISYW IPNFZ RHO RIG TKY VP8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1439-e0852bf08880714415d395882cccff7d4fb20e7b0d5f7f0388c2a012216d36b03 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1330-349X |
IngestDate | Tue Oct 22 15:15:34 EDT 2024 Sun Sep 15 04:09:01 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 01:25:32 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | false |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English Croatian German |
License | cc-by-nc: openAccess |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1439-e0852bf08880714415d395882cccff7d4fb20e7b0d5f7f0388c2a012216d36b03 |
Notes | 160659 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/fc15e70492d44c75a5b8c853ec840ab2 |
PageCount | 49 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fc15e70492d44c75a5b8c853ec840ab2 hrcak_primary_oai_hrcak_srce_hr_160659 crossref_primary_10_30925_zpfsr_37_1_12 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-01-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2016 text: 2016-01-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci |
PublicationTitle_FL | Collected papers of the Law Faculty of the University of Rijeka = Recueil des travaux de la Faculte de droit de l'Universite de Rijeka = Raccolta di scritti della Facolta di giurisprudenza dell' Universita di Rijeka = Gesammelte Schriften der Rechtswissen |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci University of Rijeka, Faculty of Law |
Publisher_xml | – name: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci – name: University of Rijeka, Faculty of Law |
SSID | ssj0000580215 |
Score | 1.6248521 |
Snippet | Proučavajući ugovore o kreditu osigurane stvarnopravnim osiguranjima, a koji se u praksi većinom sklapaju u potrošačkim odnosno B2C odnosima, autorice u... |
SourceID | doaj hrcak crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database |
StartPage | 317 |
SubjectTerms | consumer credit contract credit contract fiduciary security fiducijarno osiguranje lien residential immovable stambene nekretnine ugovor o kreditu ugovor o potrošačkom kreditu založno pravo |
Subtitle | dva srodna ili suprotstavljena pojma? |
Title | Credere i kredit |
URI | https://hrcak.srce.hr/160659 https://doaj.org/article/fc15e70492d44c75a5b8c853ec840ab2 |
Volume | 37 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NS8MwFA-6kxfxE-cXPYieOtumaVYvUl2Hm3Mb-5DdQvKSIAhT5kTwr_elrTJPXryFR2jS98r7_V6T_ELIGUOakIKm7tgH-LHh1FdUh75UKUhQhplCt-Chn9xN4-6MzVau-nJ7wkp54NJxlxZCZjjy2EjHMXAmmWoCYowBLE2kKrNvkK4UU6Wqd9OBWVFtUUw0cTorFRtpkEbs8vPVvi0alDfCRhj9QqRCuB-J6tMC5PMK0rS3yGZFEb2snNo2WdNmh6z35Mcu4bejvJWPcq_j3WOrM7nyWo-ZNx4NWv3M6_Q63ng6HA0m40n22OvmaBsOug_Z9R6ZtvPJ7Z1fXX3gAxKY1DfIhCJlMQU03QkjRFlNU4ZsGACs5Tq2KgoMV4Fmllun6AKRdKtkYaJpogK6T2rzl7k5IF4TpGYaIJEaYqWNspLyNHLbRyk1NKqTi-_XF6-lwoXAyqBwlCgcJSgXoQix543zzk8vp0xdGDBeooqX-CtedXJe-PbXU0rL2wIMNkWYuMXew_8Y7YhsIMOp_pkck9py8W5OkEUs1WnxwXwBBJu9kg |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,783,787,867,888,2109,27938,27939 |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CREDERE+I+KREDIT%3A+DVA+SRODNA+ILI+SUPROTSTAVLJENA+POJMA%3F&rft.jtitle=Zbornik+Pravnog+fakulteta+Sveu%C4%8Dili%C5%A1ta+u+Rijeci+%281991%29&rft.au=Gabrijela+Mihel%C4%8Di%C4%87&rft.au=Emilia+Mi%C5%A1%C4%87eni%C4%87&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.pub=University+of+Rijeka%2C+Faculty+of+Law&rft.issn=1330-349X&rft.eissn=1846-8314&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=365&rft_id=info:doi/10.30925%2Fzpfsr.37.1.12&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_fc15e70492d44c75a5b8c853ec840ab2 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1330-349X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1330-349X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1330-349X&client=summon |