Technical and forensic support of a defence counsel in criminal proceedings

• Published in: Вісник Харківського національного університету внутрішніх справ Vol. 108; no. 1 (Part 1); pp. 275 - 284
• Main Authors: Husieva, V. O., Kolomoitsev, M. М.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English; Ukrainian
• Published: Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs 18.04.2025
• Subjects: collection of evidence; criminal proceedings; defence counsel; forensic technique; investigative (search) action; technical and forensic means; technical means
• ISSN: 1999-5717; 2617-278X
• DOI: 10.32631/v.2025.1.22

The article determines that technical and forensic support of a defence counsel’s activities in criminal proceedings should be understood as a system of legal, organisational, scientific and technical provisions and applied measures for the development, implementation and practical use of technical means for the purpose of providing defence as intended, achieving the objectives of investigative ( search) and procedural actions, examination and recording of digital evidence. It is established that, as a general rule, current legislation does not prohibit the defence counsel from using technical and forensic means while participating in investigative (search) and procedural actions, at the same time, the defence counsel must notify all the participants of such an event of all the facts of their use, and the prosecution party, if there are objective grounds for this, although it may prohibit their use, but may do so only on the basis of a reasoned resolution, the investigating judge, the court – the ruling. It is well-grounded that the defence counsel has the right to choose the technical means which he/she plans to use for the purposes of defence, but the analysis of law enforcement practice allows to state that the most typical ones are: mobile phones for photo and video recording, making photocopies of procedural documents, material evidence, recording the procedural action; cameras for making copies of procedural documents, including during the familiarization with the criminal proceedings; video cameras for recording the procedure for conducting investigative (search) and other procedural actions; computer facilities for reviewing and making copies of digital traces and evidence, familiarising themselves with case files received in the “E-Court” system, and ensuring the electronic document control. We believe that the prospects for future research are to identify specific practical recommendations for the collection of evidence by a defence counsel, taking into account the characteristics of specific objects.