Cognitive dissonance between religious and secular social attitudes

The initial finding of the study, which served as the basis for the exploration of cognitive dissonance between religious and secular behavioral norms, was revealed in a tendency of the majority of religious students to accept behavioral norms, attitudes and believes (concerning interpersonal relati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsihologija Vol. 36; no. 2; pp. 217 - 231
Main Author Markovic, Jelena
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Drustvo Psihologa Srbije 2003
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0048-5705
1451-9283
DOI10.2298/PSI0302217M

Cover

Abstract The initial finding of the study, which served as the basis for the exploration of cognitive dissonance between religious and secular behavioral norms, was revealed in a tendency of the majority of religious students to accept behavioral norms, attitudes and believes (concerning interpersonal relationships and reproduction-related ethical issues) which are not supported by Orthodox Christian Church viewpoint and teachings. However, certain cognitive and value system consistency appeared to exist: the intensity of religiousness was related to lower degrees of secular norms approval. It has been found that religious and nonreligious subjects differ significantly in their preference of the strategy used to maintain balance between dissonant religious and secular attitudes- in 3 out of 4 issues considered in the study. Religious subjects most frequently chose relativism strategy, claiming that some specific exceptions from a general rule or standpoint do not necessarily depreciate it, while nonreligious subjects most frequently chose dualistic viewpoint that principally separated and restricted domains of reasoning on spiritual and worldly issues, making them psychologically irrelevant to one another. Kao osnova za istrazivanje kognitivne disonance religioznih i sekularnih normi, posluzio je generalni nalaz studije koji ukazuje na tendenciju vecine religioznih studenata da prihvataju norme i shvatanja (u sferi inter-personalnih odnosa i reproduktivnog ponasanja) koje svojim stavovima i ucenjima ne podrzava hriscanska pravoslavna crkva. Ipak, izvesna doslednost izmedju sistema vrednosti i sistema religioznog verovanja postoji: intenzitet religioznosti povezan je sa nizom tolerancijom prema sekularnim normama, odnosno manjim stepenom njihovog prihvatanja. Religiozni i nereligiozni ispitanici se znacajno razlikuju u 3, od 4 razmatrane situacije uravnotezavanja. Religiozni najcesce biraju strategiju relativizovanja striktnosti crkvene norme ponasanja - prema kojoj se nekim pojedinacnim izuzetkom formalno ne narusava opste pravilo ili opredeljenje, dok nereligiozni ispitanici za najadekvatnije biraju dualisticko glediste, kojim se nacelno razgranicavaju domeni zakljucivanja o duhovnim i svetovnim pitanjima, i psiholoski postavljaju u medjusobno irelevantan odnos.
AbstractList The initial finding of the study, which served as the basis for the exploration of cognitive dissonance between religious and secular behavioral norms, was revealed in a tendency of the majority of religious students to accept behavioral norms, attitudes and believes (concerning interpersonal relationships and reproduction-related ethical issues) which are not supported by Orthodox Christian Church viewpoint and teachings. However, certain cognitive and value system consistency appeared to exist: the intensity of religiousness was related to lower degrees of secular norms approval. It has been found that religious and nonreligious subjects differ significantly in their preference of the strategy used to maintain balance between dissonant religious and secular attitudes- in 3 out of 4 issues considered in the study. Religious subjects most frequently chose relativism strategy, claiming that some specific exceptions from a general rule or standpoint do not necessarily depreciate it, while nonreligious subjects most frequently chose dualistic viewpoint that principally separated and restricted domains of reasoning on spiritual and worldly issues, making them psychologically irrelevant to one another.
The initial finding of the study, which served as the basis for the exploration of cognitive dissonance between religious and secular behavioral norms, was revealed in a tendency of the majority of religious students to accept behavioral norms, attitudes and believes (concerning interpersonal relationships and reproduction-related ethical issues) which are not supported by Orthodox Christian Church viewpoint and teachings. However, certain cognitive and value system consistency appeared to exist: the intensity of religiousness was related to lower degrees of secular norms approval. It has been found that religious and nonreligious subjects differ significantly in their preference of the strategy used to maintain balance between dissonant religious and secular attitudes- in 3 out of 4 issues considered in the study. Religious subjects most frequently chose relativism strategy, claiming that some specific exceptions from a general rule or standpoint do not necessarily depreciate it, while nonreligious subjects most frequently chose dualistic viewpoint that principally separated and restricted domains of reasoning on spiritual and worldly issues, making them psychologically irrelevant to one another. Kao osnova za istrazivanje kognitivne disonance religioznih i sekularnih normi, posluzio je generalni nalaz studije koji ukazuje na tendenciju vecine religioznih studenata da prihvataju norme i shvatanja (u sferi inter-personalnih odnosa i reproduktivnog ponasanja) koje svojim stavovima i ucenjima ne podrzava hriscanska pravoslavna crkva. Ipak, izvesna doslednost izmedju sistema vrednosti i sistema religioznog verovanja postoji: intenzitet religioznosti povezan je sa nizom tolerancijom prema sekularnim normama, odnosno manjim stepenom njihovog prihvatanja. Religiozni i nereligiozni ispitanici se znacajno razlikuju u 3, od 4 razmatrane situacije uravnotezavanja. Religiozni najcesce biraju strategiju relativizovanja striktnosti crkvene norme ponasanja - prema kojoj se nekim pojedinacnim izuzetkom formalno ne narusava opste pravilo ili opredeljenje, dok nereligiozni ispitanici za najadekvatnije biraju dualisticko glediste, kojim se nacelno razgranicavaju domeni zakljucivanja o duhovnim i svetovnim pitanjima, i psiholoski postavljaju u medjusobno irelevantan odnos.
Author Markovic, Jelena
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jelena
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3973-9438
  surname: Markovic
  fullname: Markovic, Jelena
  organization: nema
BookMark eNpN0EtLw0AUBeBBKthWV_6B7CV6ZyaZx1KCj0JFQV2Hm3mUKWlGZlLFf2-0Iq4OHA7f4izIbIiDI-ScwiVjWl09Pa-AA2NUPhyROa1qWmqm-IzMASpV1hLqE7LIeQsghOJqTpomboYwhndX2JBzHHAwrujc-OHcUCTXh02I-1zgYIvszL7HVORoAvYFjmMY99blU3Lssc_u7DeX5PX25qW5L9ePd6vmel0ayvWuFNJyxIrXWmulOwOyk7oG44RiCrUAD0rqTnKlKOOCVYpb56eFNE4zwfiSrA6ujbht31LYYfpsI4b2p4hp02Iag-ldK2rbTRJAbX0lUWnqRYei8oqCVB4n6-JgmRRzTs7_eRTa7y_bf1_yL0shZ4A
Cites_doi 10.1207/S15327582IJPR1002_01
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOA
DOI 10.2298/PSI0302217M
DatabaseName CrossRef
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
EISSN 1451-9283
EndPage 231
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_65dbb73005df47a891f6ba64f81078fa
10_2298_PSI0302217M
GroupedDBID 123
29P
2WC
53S
5VS
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ABDBF
ACHQT
ACUHS
ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BCNDV
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EN8
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
IPNFZ
KQ8
OK1
REL
RIG
RNS
AFPKN
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c139m-67d3aa43599989bc07b7950ce6828a960f0879b738812362483def9507ce92623
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 0048-5705
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:26:04 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:37:29 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c139m-67d3aa43599989bc07b7950ce6828a960f0879b738812362483def9507ce92623
ORCID 0000-0003-3973-9438
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/65dbb73005df47a891f6ba64f81078fa
PageCount 15
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_65dbb73005df47a891f6ba64f81078fa
crossref_primary_10_2298_PSI0302217M
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2003-00-00
2003-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2003-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2003
  text: 2003-00-00
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationTitle Psihologija
PublicationYear 2003
Publisher Drustvo Psihologa Srbije
Publisher_xml – name: Drustvo Psihologa Srbije
References 1
References_xml – ident: 1
  doi: 10.1207/S15327582IJPR1002_01
SSID ssj0066838
Score 1.5236963
Snippet The initial finding of the study, which served as the basis for the exploration of cognitive dissonance between religious and secular behavioral norms, was...
SourceID doaj
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Index Database
StartPage 217
Title Cognitive dissonance between religious and secular social attitudes
URI https://doaj.org/article/65dbb73005df47a891f6ba64f81078fa
Volume 36
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07T8MwELZQpy6IpygveehqNXUc5zxCRSlIICSo1C3yc6NFfQz8e852WpWJhSVDdLKiO_v8nfP5O0L6deEcqKFg0oBmouSKGWklA260Bg2yDEnt81VOpuJ5Vs32Wn1FTliWB86OG8jKGZNE1V0QtcZxgzRaigBYuEBI0KhQxbaYyjlYSihzDhbAqrqo8s08zhUM3t6fcGJzhOIvv_aiPcn-tLeMj8hhCwrpXf6YY3Lg5yeku8tN36dkNNrSfGj8g76IMhmetiQrusy84s2K6rmjq9zvlubjcKrXkQ3g_OqMTMcPH6MJa_sfMIu47JPJ2pVaI55BEAfK2KI2taoK6yWWSRpLj1BArdA5AFFDhQsonQ9oUVsfZQDLc9KZL-b-glA0skHj-rQghLcOPK-cjtcDXcldUD3S33qi-coyFw2WB9FhzZ7DeuQ-emlnErWp0wuMWNNGrPkrYpf_McgV6SZaXToMuSad9XLjbxAerM1tmgn4fJwNfwAxArbd
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cognitive+dissonance+between+religious+and+secular+social+attitudes&rft.jtitle=Psihologija&rft.au=Markovic%2C+Jelena&rft.date=2003&rft.issn=0048-5705&rft.eissn=1451-9283&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=231&rft_id=info:doi/10.2298%2FPSI0302217M&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_2298_PSI0302217M
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0048-5705&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0048-5705&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0048-5705&client=summon