Different Subsets of Haematopoietic Cells and Immune Cells in Bone Marrow between Young and Old Donors
Background Young donors are reported to be associated with better transplant outcomes than old donors in allo-HSCT, but the underlying mechanism is still uncertain. Successful allo-HSCT relies on the rapid reconstitution of donor-derived haematopoietic and immune systems in the recipient. Therefore,...
Saved in:
Published in | Blood Vol. 136; no. Supplement 1; pp. 33 - 34 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Inc
05.11.2020
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background
Young donors are reported to be associated with better transplant outcomes than old donors in allo-HSCT, but the underlying mechanism is still uncertain. Successful allo-HSCT relies on the rapid reconstitution of donor-derived haematopoietic and immune systems in the recipient. Therefore, characterizing the differences in percentages of HSCs and progenitors and immune cell subtypes between young and old donors may help explain the disparities in transplant outcomes. In humans, HSCs give rise to multipotent progenitors (MPPs) that further segregate into either common myeloid progenitors (CMPs) or multipotent lymphoid progenitors (MLPs), which in turn segregate into either common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs) or granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (GMPs). CMPs further segregate into either megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor (MEPs), or GMPs. However, differences in the frequencies of HSCs and their progenitors between young and old adults remain uncertain. In addition, aGVHD is generally considered to be associated with increased ratios of donor Th1/Th2, Tc1/Tc2 and M1/M2 macrophage. However, little is known about the cytokine-producing T cell subsets and macrophage subsets in BM between young and old donors.
Aims
To evaluate the different subsets of HSCs and their progenitors and immune cells among young (aged <30 years), middle-aged (aged 30-45 years), and old donors (aged >45 years). Moreover, to analyze the association between donor characteristics and HSC frequency.
Methods
In this prospective study, a total of 60 healthy adult donors, including 20 young donors, 20 middle-aged donors, and 20 old donors were enrolled. The frequencies and ROS levels of BM HSCs(CD34+CD38−CD90+CD45RA−) and progenitors including MPPs(CD34+CD38−CD90−CD45RA−), MLPs(CD34+CD38−CD45RA+), CLPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10+CD45RA+), GMPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD45RA+), CMPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD135+CD45RA+), and MEPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD135−CD45RA−) were quantified by flow cytometry. Furthermore, T cell and macrophage subsets were analyzed in young, middle-aged and old donors by flow cytometry. Effector T cells, naïve T cells, effector memory T cells and central memory T cells were identified as CD45RA+CCR7−, CD45RA+CCR7+, CD45RA−CCR7−, and CD45RA−CCR7+. Th1, Th2, Tc1 and Tc2 were identified as CD3+CD8−IFN-γ+, CD3+CD8−IL-4+, CD3+CD8+IFN-γ+ and CD3+CD8+IL-4+, respectively. In addition, M1 and M2 were identified as CD14+CCR2+CD68+ and CD14+CX3CR1+CD163+. Moreover, the association of donor characteristics with HSC frequency was analysed by univariate and multivariate analysis.
Results
To determine the differences in HSCs and progenitors in different age donors, HSCs and six subpopulations were compared among young, middle-aged and old donors. The frequencies of HSCs and myeloid progenitors, including CMPs and MEPs in CD34+ cells were significantly lower and the frequencies of lymphoid progenitors including MLPs and CLPs in CD34+ cells were higher in the BM of young donors than in that of old donors. Significantly lower levels of ROS in HSCs and progenitors were observed in young donors than in the other donors. Furthermore, to investigate the differences in the differentiation potential from HSCs to immune cells in different age donors, T cell and macrophage subsets were compared among the three donor age groups. Young donors demonstrated a lower CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratio, lower memory T cell frequency and higher naïve T cell frequency in both CD4+ cells and CD8+ cells. Importantly, BM immune cells from young donors polarized towards less pro-inflammatory T cells characterized by Th1 and Tc1, and more immune suppressor cells, such as M2, than those from old donors. As a result, young donors had lower ratios of Th1/Th2, Tc1/Tc2 and M1/M2 in BM. In addition, multivariate analysis showed that age≥37 was independently correlated with a higher HSC frequency.
Conclusion
BM HSCs from young donors exhibited a lower frequency, balanced myeloid-lymphoid differentiation potential, lower ROS level and produced more immune suppressors and fewer immune effector cells than those from old donors. Donor age might be a good predictor of HSC frequency. Although further validation is required, the differences in the frequency and immune differentiation potential of HSCs in BM between young and old donors may partly explain the different outcomes of allo-HSCT.
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background
Young donors are reported to be associated with better transplant outcomes than old donors in allo-HSCT, but the underlying mechanism is still uncertain. Successful allo-HSCT relies on the rapid reconstitution of donor-derived haematopoietic and immune systems in the recipient. Therefore, characterizing the differences in percentages of HSCs and progenitors and immune cell subtypes between young and old donors may help explain the disparities in transplant outcomes. In humans, HSCs give rise to multipotent progenitors (MPPs) that further segregate into either common myeloid progenitors (CMPs) or multipotent lymphoid progenitors (MLPs), which in turn segregate into either common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs) or granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (GMPs). CMPs further segregate into either megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor (MEPs), or GMPs. However, differences in the frequencies of HSCs and their progenitors between young and old adults remain uncertain. In addition, aGVHD is generally considered to be associated with increased ratios of donor Th1/Th2, Tc1/Tc2 and M1/M2 macrophage. However, little is known about the cytokine-producing T cell subsets and macrophage subsets in BM between young and old donors.
Aims
To evaluate the different subsets of HSCs and their progenitors and immune cells among young (aged <30 years), middle-aged (aged 30-45 years), and old donors (aged >45 years). Moreover, to analyze the association between donor characteristics and HSC frequency.
M ethods
In this prospective study, a total of 60 healthy adult donors, including 20 young donors, 20 middle-aged donors, and 20 old donors were enrolled. The frequencies and ROS levels of BM HSCs(CD34+CD38−CD90+CD45RA−) and progenitors including MPPs(CD34+CD38−CD90−CD45RA−), MLPs(CD34+CD38−CD45RA+), CLPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10+CD45RA+), GMPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD45RA+), CMPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD135+CD45RA+), and MEPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD135−CD45RA−) were quantified by flow cytometry. Furthermore, T cell and macrophage subsets were analyzed in young, middle-aged and old donors by flow cytometry. Effector T cells, naïve T cells, effector memory T cells and central memory T cells were identified as CD45RA+CCR7−, CD45RA+CCR7+, CD45RA−CCR7−, and CD45RA−CCR7+. Th1, Th2, Tc1 and Tc2 were identified as CD3+CD8−IFN-γ+, CD3+CD8−IL-4+, CD3+CD8+IFN-γ+ and CD3+CD8+IL-4+, respectively. In addition, M1 and M2 were identified as CD14+CCR2+CD68+ and CD14+CX3CR1+CD163+. Moreover, the association of donor characteristics with HSC frequency was analysed by univariate and multivariate analysis.
Results
To determine the differences in HSCs and progenitors in different age donors, HSCs and six subpopulations were compared among young, middle-aged and old donors. The frequencies of HSCs and myeloid progenitors, including CMPs and MEPs in CD34+ cells were significantly lower and the frequencies of lymphoid progenitors including MLPs and CLPs in CD34+ cells were higher in the BM of young donors than in that of old donors. Significantly lower levels of ROS in HSCs and progenitors were observed in young donors than in the other donors. Furthermore, to investigate the differences in the differentiation potential from HSCs to immune cells in different age donors, T cell and macrophage subsets were compared among the three donor age groups. Young donors demonstrated a lower CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratio, lower memory T cell frequency and higher naïve T cell frequency in both CD4+ cells and CD8+ cells. Importantly, BM immune cells from young donors polarized towards less pro-inflammatory T cells characterized by Th1 and Tc1, and more immune suppressor cells, such as M2, than those from old donors. As a result, young donors had lower ratios of Th1/Th2, Tc1/Tc2 and M1/M2 in BM. In addition, multivariate analysis showed that age≥37 was independently correlated with a higher HSC frequency.
Conclusion
BM HSCs from young donors exhibited a lower frequency, balanced myeloid-lymphoid differentiation potential, lower ROS level and produced more immune suppressors and fewer immune effector cells than those from old donors. Donor age might be a good predictor of HSC frequency. Although further validation is required, the differences in the frequency and immune differentiation potential of HSCs in BM between young and old donors may partly explain the different outcomes of allo-HSCT.
Disclosures
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. Background Young donors are reported to be associated with better transplant outcomes than old donors in allo-HSCT, but the underlying mechanism is still uncertain. Successful allo-HSCT relies on the rapid reconstitution of donor-derived haematopoietic and immune systems in the recipient. Therefore, characterizing the differences in percentages of HSCs and progenitors and immune cell subtypes between young and old donors may help explain the disparities in transplant outcomes. In humans, HSCs give rise to multipotent progenitors (MPPs) that further segregate into either common myeloid progenitors (CMPs) or multipotent lymphoid progenitors (MLPs), which in turn segregate into either common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs) or granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (GMPs). CMPs further segregate into either megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor (MEPs), or GMPs. However, differences in the frequencies of HSCs and their progenitors between young and old adults remain uncertain. In addition, aGVHD is generally considered to be associated with increased ratios of donor Th1/Th2, Tc1/Tc2 and M1/M2 macrophage. However, little is known about the cytokine-producing T cell subsets and macrophage subsets in BM between young and old donors. Aims To evaluate the different subsets of HSCs and their progenitors and immune cells among young (aged <30 years), middle-aged (aged 30-45 years), and old donors (aged >45 years). Moreover, to analyze the association between donor characteristics and HSC frequency. Methods In this prospective study, a total of 60 healthy adult donors, including 20 young donors, 20 middle-aged donors, and 20 old donors were enrolled. The frequencies and ROS levels of BM HSCs(CD34+CD38−CD90+CD45RA−) and progenitors including MPPs(CD34+CD38−CD90−CD45RA−), MLPs(CD34+CD38−CD45RA+), CLPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10+CD45RA+), GMPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD45RA+), CMPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD135+CD45RA+), and MEPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD135−CD45RA−) were quantified by flow cytometry. Furthermore, T cell and macrophage subsets were analyzed in young, middle-aged and old donors by flow cytometry. Effector T cells, naïve T cells, effector memory T cells and central memory T cells were identified as CD45RA+CCR7−, CD45RA+CCR7+, CD45RA−CCR7−, and CD45RA−CCR7+. Th1, Th2, Tc1 and Tc2 were identified as CD3+CD8−IFN-γ+, CD3+CD8−IL-4+, CD3+CD8+IFN-γ+ and CD3+CD8+IL-4+, respectively. In addition, M1 and M2 were identified as CD14+CCR2+CD68+ and CD14+CX3CR1+CD163+. Moreover, the association of donor characteristics with HSC frequency was analysed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results To determine the differences in HSCs and progenitors in different age donors, HSCs and six subpopulations were compared among young, middle-aged and old donors. The frequencies of HSCs and myeloid progenitors, including CMPs and MEPs in CD34+ cells were significantly lower and the frequencies of lymphoid progenitors including MLPs and CLPs in CD34+ cells were higher in the BM of young donors than in that of old donors. Significantly lower levels of ROS in HSCs and progenitors were observed in young donors than in the other donors. Furthermore, to investigate the differences in the differentiation potential from HSCs to immune cells in different age donors, T cell and macrophage subsets were compared among the three donor age groups. Young donors demonstrated a lower CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratio, lower memory T cell frequency and higher naïve T cell frequency in both CD4+ cells and CD8+ cells. Importantly, BM immune cells from young donors polarized towards less pro-inflammatory T cells characterized by Th1 and Tc1, and more immune suppressor cells, such as M2, than those from old donors. As a result, young donors had lower ratios of Th1/Th2, Tc1/Tc2 and M1/M2 in BM. In addition, multivariate analysis showed that age≥37 was independently correlated with a higher HSC frequency. Conclusion BM HSCs from young donors exhibited a lower frequency, balanced myeloid-lymphoid differentiation potential, lower ROS level and produced more immune suppressors and fewer immune effector cells than those from old donors. Donor age might be a good predictor of HSC frequency. Although further validation is required, the differences in the frequency and immune differentiation potential of HSCs in BM between young and old donors may partly explain the different outcomes of allo-HSCT. No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. |
Author | Zhao, Hong-Yan Tang, Shuqian Yao, Weili Wang, Yu Huang, Xiao Jun Wen, Qi Zhang, Xiao-Hui Xu, Lan-Ping Zhang, Yuan-Yuan Kong, Yuan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Weili surname: Yao fullname: Yao, Weili organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China – sequence: 2 givenname: Qi surname: Wen fullname: Wen, Qi organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China – sequence: 3 givenname: Hong-Yan surname: Zhao fullname: Zhao, Hong-Yan organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China – sequence: 4 givenname: Yuan-Yuan surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Yuan-Yuan organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China – sequence: 5 givenname: Shuqian surname: Tang fullname: Tang, Shuqian organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China – sequence: 6 givenname: Yu surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Yu organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematology Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China – sequence: 7 givenname: Lan-Ping surname: Xu fullname: Xu, Lan-Ping organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China – sequence: 8 givenname: Xiao-Hui surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Xiao-Hui organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China – sequence: 9 givenname: Xiao Jun surname: Huang fullname: Huang, Xiao Jun organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China – sequence: 10 givenname: Yuan surname: Kong fullname: Kong, Yuan organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China |
BookMark | eNp9kMtOwzAQRS1UJNrCB7DzDwQ8dtIkYgUt0EpFXQALVpEfY2SU2JWdUvH3pC1rViNdzbm6OhMy8sEjIdfAbgAqfqvaEEzGGWcZiLwsqjMyhoJXGRuiERkzxmZZXpdwQSYpfTEGueDFmNiFsxYj-p6-7lTCPtFg6VJiJ_uwDQ57p-kc2zZR6Q1ddd3O41_gPH0YVtAXGWPYU4X9HtHTj7Dzn8fvTWvoIvgQ0yU5t7JNePV3p-T96fFtvszWm-fV_H6daRBllZW8kiAYVIwpZqCoQUGh8xmWtTFcgBYyt7Xiw_xazUoprNWltFwD2gFSYkrg1KtjSCmibbbRdTL-NMCag6jmKKo5iGpOogbm7sTgMOzbYWySdug1GhdR940J7h_6FwQEcnM |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2020 American Society of Hematology |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 American Society of Hematology |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.1182/blood-2020-134758 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Chemistry Biology Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1528-0020 |
EndPage | 34 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1182_blood_2020_134758 S0006497118727973 |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .55 1CY 23N 2WC 34G 39C 4.4 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 AAEDW AAXUO ABOCM ABVKL ACGFO ADBBV AENEX AFOSN AHPSJ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ BAWUL BTFSW CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD EX3 F5P FDB FRP GS5 GX1 IH2 K-O KQ8 L7B LSO MJL N9A OK1 P2P R.V RHF RHI ROL SJN THE TR2 TWZ W2D W8F WH7 WOQ WOW X7M YHG YKV ZA5 0R~ 0SF AALRI AAYXX ADVLN AFETI AITUG AKRWK CITATION H13 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1378-728a1301800b0d1591b15c46e79dd231c3a4f9b20019b67a3ffc7af2c1ef180b3 |
IEDL.DBID | ABVKL |
ISSN | 0006-4971 |
IngestDate | Thu Sep 12 16:40:54 EDT 2024 Fri Feb 23 02:43:33 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | Supplement 1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1378-728a1301800b0d1591b15c46e79dd231c3a4f9b20019b67a3ffc7af2c1ef180b3 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2020-134758 |
PageCount | 2 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2020_134758 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1182_blood_2020_134758 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-11-05 2020-11-5 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-11-05 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2020 text: 2020-11-05 day: 05 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Blood |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
SSID | ssj0014325 |
Score | 2.388222 |
Snippet | Background
Young donors are reported to be associated with better transplant outcomes than old donors in allo-HSCT, but the underlying mechanism is still... |
SourceID | crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | 33 |
Title | Different Subsets of Haematopoietic Cells and Immune Cells in Bone Marrow between Young and Old Donors |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2020-134758 |
Volume | 136 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV07T8MwED6VIh4LghZEeVQeEANS1DqPphn7oGophYWibpHt2FKkklRtGfj3nB0HgQQLW2LlIstn331n3_kDuOGI63EhcIdj8OEgAk8c3gmpI6kUUYiAnxs6oNlTZzz3HxbBogKDshZGp1Va21_YdGOtbUvLjmZrlaa6xhfdaRRqvmw3jEJvB3ZdRL-4Ond7_dfp49dhgu-5BZEBBs9awB5uIrJuFdnhro6hdE2lJn7_zT19czmjYziyWJH0iu6cQEVmNaj3MoyT3z7ILTHZm2ZbvAZ7_fLpYFByuNVgf2aPzuughpYKZUu0sZDbDckVGTN9Z2u-ylNdzEgGcrncEJYlZKLrRqRtSDPSz_FtZm5sJDa3ixhLYb5-XiZkmGf5enMK89H9y2DsWJIFR1API8jQ7TL0YxSBI28nCG4op4HwOzKMkgTBn_CYryKuU68i1CLzlBIhU66gUqEQ986gmmEXzoF4-BvBEB-KTuAngnYliwKpkjbHhc6UbMBdObbxqrhLIzYxSNeNjSJirYi4UEQD_HL04x8TIkZb_7fYxf_ELuGwmATUaQdXUN2u3-U1oo0tb9rZ1ES8PZl-Apha0ao |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,27581,27936,27937,45675 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV07T8MwED6VIigLghbEGw-IASlqnUfdjH1QFWhhaRFbZDu2VKkkFS0D_56z4yCQYGFLrFxk-ey77-w7fwBXAnE9LgThCQw-PETgqSfajHqKKhkzBPzC0gFNHtujWXj_Er1UoF_Wwpi0Smf7C5turbVrabrRbC7nc1Pji-40ZoYv22cxCzZgE9EAi6qw2e09P4y_DhPCwC-IDDB4NgLucBORdbPIDvdNDGVqKg3x-2_u6ZvLGe7BrsOKpFt0Zx8qKqtDo5thnPz6Qa6Jzd602-J12OqVT7V-yeFWh-2JOzpvgB44KpQ1McZCrVck12TEzZ2t-TKfm2JG0leLxYrwLCV3pm5EuYZ5Rno5vk3sjY3E5XYRayns10-LlAzyLH9bHcBseDvtjzxHsuBJGmAEyfwORz9GETiKVorghgoaybCtWJymCP5kwEMdC5N6FaMWeaC1ZFz7kiqNQiI4hGqGXTgCEuBvJEd8KNtRmEraUTyOlE5bAhc61-oYbsqxTZbFXRqJjUE6fmIVkRhFJIUijiEsRz_5MSEStPV_i538T-wSaqPpZJyM7x4fTmGnmBDUa0VnUF2_vatzRB5rceFm1iejy9Of |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different+Subsets+of+Haematopoietic+Cells+and+Immune+Cells+in+Bone+Marrow+between+Young+and+Old+Donors&rft.jtitle=Blood&rft.au=Yao%2C+Weili&rft.au=Wen%2C+Qi&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Hong-Yan&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Yuan-Yuan&rft.date=2020-11-05&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0006-4971&rft.eissn=1528-0020&rft.volume=136&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=34&rft_id=info:doi/10.1182%2Fblood-2020-134758&rft.externalDocID=S0006497118727973 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0006-4971&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0006-4971&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0006-4971&client=summon |