Different Subsets of Haematopoietic Cells and Immune Cells in Bone Marrow between Young and Old Donors

Background Young donors are reported to be associated with better transplant outcomes than old donors in allo-HSCT, but the underlying mechanism is still uncertain. Successful allo-HSCT relies on the rapid reconstitution of donor-derived haematopoietic and immune systems in the recipient. Therefore,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBlood Vol. 136; no. Supplement 1; pp. 33 - 34
Main Authors Yao, Weili, Wen, Qi, Zhao, Hong-Yan, Zhang, Yuan-Yuan, Tang, Shuqian, Wang, Yu, Xu, Lan-Ping, Zhang, Xiao-Hui, Huang, Xiao Jun, Kong, Yuan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 05.11.2020
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background Young donors are reported to be associated with better transplant outcomes than old donors in allo-HSCT, but the underlying mechanism is still uncertain. Successful allo-HSCT relies on the rapid reconstitution of donor-derived haematopoietic and immune systems in the recipient. Therefore, characterizing the differences in percentages of HSCs and progenitors and immune cell subtypes between young and old donors may help explain the disparities in transplant outcomes. In humans, HSCs give rise to multipotent progenitors (MPPs) that further segregate into either common myeloid progenitors (CMPs) or multipotent lymphoid progenitors (MLPs), which in turn segregate into either common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs) or granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (GMPs). CMPs further segregate into either megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor (MEPs), or GMPs. However, differences in the frequencies of HSCs and their progenitors between young and old adults remain uncertain. In addition, aGVHD is generally considered to be associated with increased ratios of donor Th1/Th2, Tc1/Tc2 and M1/M2 macrophage. However, little is known about the cytokine-producing T cell subsets and macrophage subsets in BM between young and old donors. Aims To evaluate the different subsets of HSCs and their progenitors and immune cells among young (aged <30 years), middle-aged (aged 30-45 years), and old donors (aged >45 years). Moreover, to analyze the association between donor characteristics and HSC frequency. Methods In this prospective study, a total of 60 healthy adult donors, including 20 young donors, 20 middle-aged donors, and 20 old donors were enrolled. The frequencies and ROS levels of BM HSCs(CD34+CD38−CD90+CD45RA−) and progenitors including MPPs(CD34+CD38−CD90−CD45RA−), MLPs(CD34+CD38−CD45RA+), CLPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10+CD45RA+), GMPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD45RA+), CMPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD135+CD45RA+), and MEPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD135−CD45RA−) were quantified by flow cytometry. Furthermore, T cell and macrophage subsets were analyzed in young, middle-aged and old donors by flow cytometry. Effector T cells, naïve T cells, effector memory T cells and central memory T cells were identified as CD45RA+CCR7−, CD45RA+CCR7+, CD45RA−CCR7−, and CD45RA−CCR7+. Th1, Th2, Tc1 and Tc2 were identified as CD3+CD8−IFN-γ+, CD3+CD8−IL-4+, CD3+CD8+IFN-γ+ and CD3+CD8+IL-4+, respectively. In addition, M1 and M2 were identified as CD14+CCR2+CD68+ and CD14+CX3CR1+CD163+. Moreover, the association of donor characteristics with HSC frequency was analysed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results To determine the differences in HSCs and progenitors in different age donors, HSCs and six subpopulations were compared among young, middle-aged and old donors. The frequencies of HSCs and myeloid progenitors, including CMPs and MEPs in CD34+ cells were significantly lower and the frequencies of lymphoid progenitors including MLPs and CLPs in CD34+ cells were higher in the BM of young donors than in that of old donors. Significantly lower levels of ROS in HSCs and progenitors were observed in young donors than in the other donors. Furthermore, to investigate the differences in the differentiation potential from HSCs to immune cells in different age donors, T cell and macrophage subsets were compared among the three donor age groups. Young donors demonstrated a lower CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratio, lower memory T cell frequency and higher naïve T cell frequency in both CD4+ cells and CD8+ cells. Importantly, BM immune cells from young donors polarized towards less pro-inflammatory T cells characterized by Th1 and Tc1, and more immune suppressor cells, such as M2, than those from old donors. As a result, young donors had lower ratios of Th1/Th2, Tc1/Tc2 and M1/M2 in BM. In addition, multivariate analysis showed that age≥37 was independently correlated with a higher HSC frequency. Conclusion BM HSCs from young donors exhibited a lower frequency, balanced myeloid-lymphoid differentiation potential, lower ROS level and produced more immune suppressors and fewer immune effector cells than those from old donors. Donor age might be a good predictor of HSC frequency. Although further validation is required, the differences in the frequency and immune differentiation potential of HSCs in BM between young and old donors may partly explain the different outcomes of allo-HSCT. No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
AbstractList Background Young donors are reported to be associated with better transplant outcomes than old donors in allo-HSCT, but the underlying mechanism is still uncertain. Successful allo-HSCT relies on the rapid reconstitution of donor-derived haematopoietic and immune systems in the recipient. Therefore, characterizing the differences in percentages of HSCs and progenitors and immune cell subtypes between young and old donors may help explain the disparities in transplant outcomes. In humans, HSCs give rise to multipotent progenitors (MPPs) that further segregate into either common myeloid progenitors (CMPs) or multipotent lymphoid progenitors (MLPs), which in turn segregate into either common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs) or granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (GMPs). CMPs further segregate into either megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor (MEPs), or GMPs. However, differences in the frequencies of HSCs and their progenitors between young and old adults remain uncertain. In addition, aGVHD is generally considered to be associated with increased ratios of donor Th1/Th2, Tc1/Tc2 and M1/M2 macrophage. However, little is known about the cytokine-producing T cell subsets and macrophage subsets in BM between young and old donors. Aims To evaluate the different subsets of HSCs and their progenitors and immune cells among young (aged <30 years), middle-aged (aged 30-45 years), and old donors (aged >45 years). Moreover, to analyze the association between donor characteristics and HSC frequency. M ethods In this prospective study, a total of 60 healthy adult donors, including 20 young donors, 20 middle-aged donors, and 20 old donors were enrolled. The frequencies and ROS levels of BM HSCs(CD34+CD38−CD90+CD45RA−) and progenitors including MPPs(CD34+CD38−CD90−CD45RA−), MLPs(CD34+CD38−CD45RA+), CLPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10+CD45RA+), GMPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD45RA+), CMPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD135+CD45RA+), and MEPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD135−CD45RA−) were quantified by flow cytometry. Furthermore, T cell and macrophage subsets were analyzed in young, middle-aged and old donors by flow cytometry. Effector T cells, naïve T cells, effector memory T cells and central memory T cells were identified as CD45RA+CCR7−, CD45RA+CCR7+, CD45RA−CCR7−, and CD45RA−CCR7+. Th1, Th2, Tc1 and Tc2 were identified as CD3+CD8−IFN-γ+, CD3+CD8−IL-4+, CD3+CD8+IFN-γ+ and CD3+CD8+IL-4+, respectively. In addition, M1 and M2 were identified as CD14+CCR2+CD68+ and CD14+CX3CR1+CD163+. Moreover, the association of donor characteristics with HSC frequency was analysed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results To determine the differences in HSCs and progenitors in different age donors, HSCs and six subpopulations were compared among young, middle-aged and old donors. The frequencies of HSCs and myeloid progenitors, including CMPs and MEPs in CD34+ cells were significantly lower and the frequencies of lymphoid progenitors including MLPs and CLPs in CD34+ cells were higher in the BM of young donors than in that of old donors. Significantly lower levels of ROS in HSCs and progenitors were observed in young donors than in the other donors. Furthermore, to investigate the differences in the differentiation potential from HSCs to immune cells in different age donors, T cell and macrophage subsets were compared among the three donor age groups. Young donors demonstrated a lower CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratio, lower memory T cell frequency and higher naïve T cell frequency in both CD4+ cells and CD8+ cells. Importantly, BM immune cells from young donors polarized towards less pro-inflammatory T cells characterized by Th1 and Tc1, and more immune suppressor cells, such as M2, than those from old donors. As a result, young donors had lower ratios of Th1/Th2, Tc1/Tc2 and M1/M2 in BM. In addition, multivariate analysis showed that age≥37 was independently correlated with a higher HSC frequency. Conclusion BM HSCs from young donors exhibited a lower frequency, balanced myeloid-lymphoid differentiation potential, lower ROS level and produced more immune suppressors and fewer immune effector cells than those from old donors. Donor age might be a good predictor of HSC frequency. Although further validation is required, the differences in the frequency and immune differentiation potential of HSCs in BM between young and old donors may partly explain the different outcomes of allo-HSCT. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Background Young donors are reported to be associated with better transplant outcomes than old donors in allo-HSCT, but the underlying mechanism is still uncertain. Successful allo-HSCT relies on the rapid reconstitution of donor-derived haematopoietic and immune systems in the recipient. Therefore, characterizing the differences in percentages of HSCs and progenitors and immune cell subtypes between young and old donors may help explain the disparities in transplant outcomes. In humans, HSCs give rise to multipotent progenitors (MPPs) that further segregate into either common myeloid progenitors (CMPs) or multipotent lymphoid progenitors (MLPs), which in turn segregate into either common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs) or granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (GMPs). CMPs further segregate into either megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor (MEPs), or GMPs. However, differences in the frequencies of HSCs and their progenitors between young and old adults remain uncertain. In addition, aGVHD is generally considered to be associated with increased ratios of donor Th1/Th2, Tc1/Tc2 and M1/M2 macrophage. However, little is known about the cytokine-producing T cell subsets and macrophage subsets in BM between young and old donors. Aims To evaluate the different subsets of HSCs and their progenitors and immune cells among young (aged <30 years), middle-aged (aged 30-45 years), and old donors (aged >45 years). Moreover, to analyze the association between donor characteristics and HSC frequency. Methods In this prospective study, a total of 60 healthy adult donors, including 20 young donors, 20 middle-aged donors, and 20 old donors were enrolled. The frequencies and ROS levels of BM HSCs(CD34+CD38−CD90+CD45RA−) and progenitors including MPPs(CD34+CD38−CD90−CD45RA−), MLPs(CD34+CD38−CD45RA+), CLPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10+CD45RA+), GMPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD45RA+), CMPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD135+CD45RA+), and MEPs(CD34+CD38+CD7−CD10−CD135−CD45RA−) were quantified by flow cytometry. Furthermore, T cell and macrophage subsets were analyzed in young, middle-aged and old donors by flow cytometry. Effector T cells, naïve T cells, effector memory T cells and central memory T cells were identified as CD45RA+CCR7−, CD45RA+CCR7+, CD45RA−CCR7−, and CD45RA−CCR7+. Th1, Th2, Tc1 and Tc2 were identified as CD3+CD8−IFN-γ+, CD3+CD8−IL-4+, CD3+CD8+IFN-γ+ and CD3+CD8+IL-4+, respectively. In addition, M1 and M2 were identified as CD14+CCR2+CD68+ and CD14+CX3CR1+CD163+. Moreover, the association of donor characteristics with HSC frequency was analysed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results To determine the differences in HSCs and progenitors in different age donors, HSCs and six subpopulations were compared among young, middle-aged and old donors. The frequencies of HSCs and myeloid progenitors, including CMPs and MEPs in CD34+ cells were significantly lower and the frequencies of lymphoid progenitors including MLPs and CLPs in CD34+ cells were higher in the BM of young donors than in that of old donors. Significantly lower levels of ROS in HSCs and progenitors were observed in young donors than in the other donors. Furthermore, to investigate the differences in the differentiation potential from HSCs to immune cells in different age donors, T cell and macrophage subsets were compared among the three donor age groups. Young donors demonstrated a lower CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratio, lower memory T cell frequency and higher naïve T cell frequency in both CD4+ cells and CD8+ cells. Importantly, BM immune cells from young donors polarized towards less pro-inflammatory T cells characterized by Th1 and Tc1, and more immune suppressor cells, such as M2, than those from old donors. As a result, young donors had lower ratios of Th1/Th2, Tc1/Tc2 and M1/M2 in BM. In addition, multivariate analysis showed that age≥37 was independently correlated with a higher HSC frequency. Conclusion BM HSCs from young donors exhibited a lower frequency, balanced myeloid-lymphoid differentiation potential, lower ROS level and produced more immune suppressors and fewer immune effector cells than those from old donors. Donor age might be a good predictor of HSC frequency. Although further validation is required, the differences in the frequency and immune differentiation potential of HSCs in BM between young and old donors may partly explain the different outcomes of allo-HSCT. No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Author Zhao, Hong-Yan
Tang, Shuqian
Yao, Weili
Wang, Yu
Huang, Xiao Jun
Wen, Qi
Zhang, Xiao-Hui
Xu, Lan-Ping
Zhang, Yuan-Yuan
Kong, Yuan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Weili
  surname: Yao
  fullname: Yao, Weili
  organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Qi
  surname: Wen
  fullname: Wen, Qi
  organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hong-Yan
  surname: Zhao
  fullname: Zhao, Hong-Yan
  organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Yuan-Yuan
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Yuan-Yuan
  organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Shuqian
  surname: Tang
  fullname: Tang, Shuqian
  organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Yu
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Yu
  organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematology Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Lan-Ping
  surname: Xu
  fullname: Xu, Lan-Ping
  organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Xiao-Hui
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Xiao-Hui
  organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Xiao Jun
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Xiao Jun
  organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Yuan
  surname: Kong
  fullname: Kong, Yuan
  organization: Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of HSCT, Peking University, Beijing, China
BookMark eNp9kMtOwzAQRS1UJNrCB7DzDwQ8dtIkYgUt0EpFXQALVpEfY2SU2JWdUvH3pC1rViNdzbm6OhMy8sEjIdfAbgAqfqvaEEzGGWcZiLwsqjMyhoJXGRuiERkzxmZZXpdwQSYpfTEGueDFmNiFsxYj-p6-7lTCPtFg6VJiJ_uwDQ57p-kc2zZR6Q1ddd3O41_gPH0YVtAXGWPYU4X9HtHTj7Dzn8fvTWvoIvgQ0yU5t7JNePV3p-T96fFtvszWm-fV_H6daRBllZW8kiAYVIwpZqCoQUGh8xmWtTFcgBYyt7Xiw_xazUoprNWltFwD2gFSYkrg1KtjSCmibbbRdTL-NMCag6jmKKo5iGpOogbm7sTgMOzbYWySdug1GhdR940J7h_6FwQEcnM
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 American Society of Hematology
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 American Society of Hematology
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1182/blood-2020-134758
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Chemistry
Biology
Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1528-0020
EndPage 34
ExternalDocumentID 10_1182_blood_2020_134758
S0006497118727973
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.55
1CY
23N
2WC
34G
39C
4.4
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6J9
AAEDW
AAXUO
ABOCM
ABVKL
ACGFO
ADBBV
AENEX
AFOSN
AHPSJ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
BAWUL
BTFSW
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EX3
F5P
FDB
FRP
GS5
GX1
IH2
K-O
KQ8
L7B
LSO
MJL
N9A
OK1
P2P
R.V
RHF
RHI
ROL
SJN
THE
TR2
TWZ
W2D
W8F
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X7M
YHG
YKV
ZA5
0R~
0SF
AALRI
AAYXX
ADVLN
AFETI
AITUG
AKRWK
CITATION
H13
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1378-728a1301800b0d1591b15c46e79dd231c3a4f9b20019b67a3ffc7af2c1ef180b3
IEDL.DBID ABVKL
ISSN 0006-4971
IngestDate Thu Sep 12 16:40:54 EDT 2024
Fri Feb 23 02:43:33 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue Supplement 1
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1378-728a1301800b0d1591b15c46e79dd231c3a4f9b20019b67a3ffc7af2c1ef180b3
OpenAccessLink https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2020-134758
PageCount 2
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2020_134758
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1182_blood_2020_134758
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-11-05
2020-11-5
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-11-05
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-11-05
  day: 05
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Blood
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
SSID ssj0014325
Score 2.388222
Snippet Background Young donors are reported to be associated with better transplant outcomes than old donors in allo-HSCT, but the underlying mechanism is still...
SourceID crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Publisher
StartPage 33
Title Different Subsets of Haematopoietic Cells and Immune Cells in Bone Marrow between Young and Old Donors
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2020-134758
Volume 136
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV07T8MwED6VIh4LghZEeVQeEANS1DqPphn7oGophYWibpHt2FKkklRtGfj3nB0HgQQLW2LlIstn331n3_kDuOGI63EhcIdj8OEgAk8c3gmpI6kUUYiAnxs6oNlTZzz3HxbBogKDshZGp1Va21_YdGOtbUvLjmZrlaa6xhfdaRRqvmw3jEJvB3ZdRL-4Ond7_dfp49dhgu-5BZEBBs9awB5uIrJuFdnhro6hdE2lJn7_zT19czmjYziyWJH0iu6cQEVmNaj3MoyT3z7ILTHZm2ZbvAZ7_fLpYFByuNVgf2aPzuughpYKZUu0sZDbDckVGTN9Z2u-ylNdzEgGcrncEJYlZKLrRqRtSDPSz_FtZm5sJDa3ixhLYb5-XiZkmGf5enMK89H9y2DsWJIFR1API8jQ7TL0YxSBI28nCG4op4HwOzKMkgTBn_CYryKuU68i1CLzlBIhU66gUqEQ986gmmEXzoF4-BvBEB-KTuAngnYliwKpkjbHhc6UbMBdObbxqrhLIzYxSNeNjSJirYi4UEQD_HL04x8TIkZb_7fYxf_ELuGwmATUaQdXUN2u3-U1oo0tb9rZ1ES8PZl-Apha0ao
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,27581,27936,27937,45675
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV07T8MwED6VIigLghbEGw-IASlqnUfdjH1QFWhhaRFbZDu2VKkkFS0D_56z4yCQYGFLrFxk-ey77-w7fwBXAnE9LgThCQw-PETgqSfajHqKKhkzBPzC0gFNHtujWXj_Er1UoF_Wwpi0Smf7C5turbVrabrRbC7nc1Pji-40ZoYv22cxCzZgE9EAi6qw2e09P4y_DhPCwC-IDDB4NgLucBORdbPIDvdNDGVqKg3x-2_u6ZvLGe7BrsOKpFt0Zx8qKqtDo5thnPz6Qa6Jzd602-J12OqVT7V-yeFWh-2JOzpvgB44KpQ1McZCrVck12TEzZ2t-TKfm2JG0leLxYrwLCV3pm5EuYZ5Rno5vk3sjY3E5XYRayns10-LlAzyLH9bHcBseDvtjzxHsuBJGmAEyfwORz9GETiKVorghgoaybCtWJymCP5kwEMdC5N6FaMWeaC1ZFz7kiqNQiI4hGqGXTgCEuBvJEd8KNtRmEraUTyOlE5bAhc61-oYbsqxTZbFXRqJjUE6fmIVkRhFJIUijiEsRz_5MSEStPV_i538T-wSaqPpZJyM7x4fTmGnmBDUa0VnUF2_vatzRB5rceFm1iejy9Of
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different+Subsets+of+Haematopoietic+Cells+and+Immune+Cells+in+Bone+Marrow+between+Young+and+Old+Donors&rft.jtitle=Blood&rft.au=Yao%2C+Weili&rft.au=Wen%2C+Qi&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Hong-Yan&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Yuan-Yuan&rft.date=2020-11-05&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0006-4971&rft.eissn=1528-0020&rft.volume=136&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=34&rft_id=info:doi/10.1182%2Fblood-2020-134758&rft.externalDocID=S0006497118727973
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0006-4971&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0006-4971&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0006-4971&client=summon