Pain Experience during Initial Alignment with a Self-Ligating and a Conventional Fixed Orthodontic Appliance System A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Objectives: To test the hypotheses that (1) there is no difference in the pain experience during the week following initial placement of two orthodontic appliances (SmartClip™ and Victory™; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif); and (2) there is no difference in the pain experience during removal and insertio...
Saved in:
Published in | The Angle orthodontist Vol. 79; no. 1; pp. 46 - 50 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.01.2009
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0003-3219 1945-7103 |
DOI | 10.2319/121007-579.1 |
Cover
Abstract | Objectives: To test the hypotheses that (1) there is no difference in the pain experience during the week following initial placement of two orthodontic appliances (SmartClip™ and Victory™; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif); and (2) there is no difference in the pain experience during removal and insertion of orthodontic archwires with these brackets.
Materials and Methods: Sixty-six consecutive patients were treated with a self-ligating bracket system (SmartClip™) or a conventional appliance (Victory™) on the basis of computer-generated random allocation. After appliance placement and engagement of a 0.016″ nickel-titanium archwire, pain experience was recorded after 4, 24, and 72 hours and after 7 days with the use of a visual analog system (VAS) questionnaire. At a subsequent visit, participants documented pain experiences during removal and insertion of 0.019 × 0.025″ archwires on an additional 100 mm VAS questionnaire. Independent t -tests and analyses of covariance were used to analyze normally distributed data; the Mann-Whitney U -test was used for skewed distributions.
Results: Forty-eight (72.2%) and fifty-one (77.3%) subjects completed the first and second parts of the study, respectively. Bracket type had no influence on pain experience at 4 hours ( P = .958), 24 hours ( P = .289), 72 hours ( P = .569), and 7 days ( P = .756) following appliance placement. However, bracket type significantly influenced pain experience during archwire removal ( P = .001) and insertion ( P = .013).
Conclusions: Hypothesis 1 cannot be rejected. The bracket type had no effect on subjective pain experience during the first week after initial placement of two preadjusted orthodontic appliances. Hypothesis 2 was rejected. Significantly greater discomfort was experienced during archwire insertion and removal with the SmartClip™ appliance. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objectives: To test the hypotheses that (1) there is no difference in the pain experience during the week following initial placement of two orthodontic appliances (SmartClip™ and Victory™; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif); and (2) there is no difference in the pain experience during removal and insertion of orthodontic archwires with these brackets.
Materials and Methods: Sixty-six consecutive patients were treated with a self-ligating bracket system (SmartClip™) or a conventional appliance (Victory™) on the basis of computer-generated random allocation. After appliance placement and engagement of a 0.016″ nickel-titanium archwire, pain experience was recorded after 4, 24, and 72 hours and after 7 days with the use of a visual analog system (VAS) questionnaire. At a subsequent visit, participants documented pain experiences during removal and insertion of 0.019 × 0.025″ archwires on an additional 100 mm VAS questionnaire. Independent t -tests and analyses of covariance were used to analyze normally distributed data; the Mann-Whitney U -test was used for skewed distributions.
Results: Forty-eight (72.2%) and fifty-one (77.3%) subjects completed the first and second parts of the study, respectively. Bracket type had no influence on pain experience at 4 hours ( P = .958), 24 hours ( P = .289), 72 hours ( P = .569), and 7 days ( P = .756) following appliance placement. However, bracket type significantly influenced pain experience during archwire removal ( P = .001) and insertion ( P = .013).
Conclusions: Hypothesis 1 cannot be rejected. The bracket type had no effect on subjective pain experience during the first week after initial placement of two preadjusted orthodontic appliances. Hypothesis 2 was rejected. Significantly greater discomfort was experienced during archwire insertion and removal with the SmartClip™ appliance. To test the hypotheses that (1) there is no difference in the pain experience during the week following initial placement of two orthodontic appliances (SmartClip and Victory; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif); and (2) there is no difference in the pain experience during removal and insertion of orthodontic archwires with these brackets. Sixty-six consecutive patients were treated with a self-ligating bracket system (SmartClip) or a conventional appliance (Victory) on the basis of computer-generated random allocation. After appliance placement and engagement of a 0.016'' nickel-titanium archwire, pain experience was recorded after 4, 24, and 72 hours and after 7 days with the use of a visual analog system (VAS) questionnaire. At a subsequent visit, participants documented pain experiences during removal and insertion of 0.019 x 0.025'' archwires on an additional 100 mm VAS questionnaire. Independent t-tests and analyses of covariance were used to analyze normally distributed data; the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for skewed distributions. Forty-eight (72.2%) and fifty-one (77.3%) subjects completed the first and second parts of the study, respectively. Bracket type had no influence on pain experience at 4 hours (P = .958), 24 hours (P = .289), 72 hours (P = .569), and 7 days (P = .756) following appliance placement. However, bracket type significantly influenced pain experience during archwire removal (P = .001) and insertion (P = .013). Hypothesis 1 cannot be rejected. The bracket type had no effect on subjective pain experience during the first week after initial placement of two preadjusted orthodontic appliances. Hypothesis 2 was rejected. Significantly greater discomfort was experienced during archwire insertion and removal with the SmartClip appliance. To test the hypotheses that (1) there is no difference in the pain experience during the week following initial placement of two orthodontic appliances (SmartClip and Victory; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif); and (2) there is no difference in the pain experience during removal and insertion of orthodontic archwires with these brackets.OBJECTIVESTo test the hypotheses that (1) there is no difference in the pain experience during the week following initial placement of two orthodontic appliances (SmartClip and Victory; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif); and (2) there is no difference in the pain experience during removal and insertion of orthodontic archwires with these brackets.Sixty-six consecutive patients were treated with a self-ligating bracket system (SmartClip) or a conventional appliance (Victory) on the basis of computer-generated random allocation. After appliance placement and engagement of a 0.016'' nickel-titanium archwire, pain experience was recorded after 4, 24, and 72 hours and after 7 days with the use of a visual analog system (VAS) questionnaire. At a subsequent visit, participants documented pain experiences during removal and insertion of 0.019 x 0.025'' archwires on an additional 100 mm VAS questionnaire. Independent t-tests and analyses of covariance were used to analyze normally distributed data; the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for skewed distributions.MATERIALS AND METHODSSixty-six consecutive patients were treated with a self-ligating bracket system (SmartClip) or a conventional appliance (Victory) on the basis of computer-generated random allocation. After appliance placement and engagement of a 0.016'' nickel-titanium archwire, pain experience was recorded after 4, 24, and 72 hours and after 7 days with the use of a visual analog system (VAS) questionnaire. At a subsequent visit, participants documented pain experiences during removal and insertion of 0.019 x 0.025'' archwires on an additional 100 mm VAS questionnaire. Independent t-tests and analyses of covariance were used to analyze normally distributed data; the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for skewed distributions.Forty-eight (72.2%) and fifty-one (77.3%) subjects completed the first and second parts of the study, respectively. Bracket type had no influence on pain experience at 4 hours (P = .958), 24 hours (P = .289), 72 hours (P = .569), and 7 days (P = .756) following appliance placement. However, bracket type significantly influenced pain experience during archwire removal (P = .001) and insertion (P = .013).RESULTSForty-eight (72.2%) and fifty-one (77.3%) subjects completed the first and second parts of the study, respectively. Bracket type had no influence on pain experience at 4 hours (P = .958), 24 hours (P = .289), 72 hours (P = .569), and 7 days (P = .756) following appliance placement. However, bracket type significantly influenced pain experience during archwire removal (P = .001) and insertion (P = .013).Hypothesis 1 cannot be rejected. The bracket type had no effect on subjective pain experience during the first week after initial placement of two preadjusted orthodontic appliances. Hypothesis 2 was rejected. Significantly greater discomfort was experienced during archwire insertion and removal with the SmartClip appliance.CONCLUSIONSHypothesis 1 cannot be rejected. The bracket type had no effect on subjective pain experience during the first week after initial placement of two preadjusted orthodontic appliances. Hypothesis 2 was rejected. Significantly greater discomfort was experienced during archwire insertion and removal with the SmartClip appliance. |
Author | Fleming, P. S. DiBiase, A. T. Sarri, G. Lee, R. T. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: P. S. surname: Fleming fullname: Fleming, P. S. organization: a Specialist Registrar in Orthodontics, Royal London Hospital, London, UK – sequence: 2 givenname: A. T. surname: DiBiase fullname: DiBiase, A. T. organization: b Consultant Orthodontist, Kent & Canterbury Hospital, London, UK – sequence: 3 givenname: G. surname: Sarri fullname: Sarri, G. organization: c PhD Research Student, Royal London Hospital, London, UK – sequence: 4 givenname: R. T. surname: Lee fullname: Lee, R. T. organization: d Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Royal London Hospital, London, UK |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19123718$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkUtLLDEUhIMoOj52riUrV7bmpB_pLIdB7xUGFNR1OJ2kx0h3uk0yPv69PYy6uNzVgeKrgjp1SHb94C0hp8AueQ7yCjgwJrJSyEvYITOQRZkJYPkumTHG8iznIA_IYYwvjPGyLPg-OQAJPBdQz0i8R-fp9cdog7NeW2rWwfkVvfUuOezovHMr31uf6LtLzxTpg-3abOlWmDYYejNpi8G_TYgb_OS4cR_W0LuQngczTKKm83HsHG7CHz5jsv0x2Wuxi_bk-x6Rp5vrx8XfbHn353YxX2Ya8qLOgBmEoq6NEWBBc6lZIU1V8oJzbGXVlkXTmgZFqcEggwZlU1e2laJpBccyPyLn29wxDK9rG5PqXdS269DbYR1VVdUsr4WcwLNvcN301qgxuB7Dp_p50wTwLaDDEGOwrdIu4aZwCug6BUxttlDbLdS0hYLJdPGP6Tf3f_gX90WJ-A |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_2319_081009_454_1 crossref_primary_10_1093_ejo_cjt035 crossref_primary_10_4103_jdmimsu_jdmimsu_105_20 crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_352031 crossref_primary_10_3390_app112412013 crossref_primary_10_3390_app10207136 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40510_014_0064_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ortho_2017_06_009 crossref_primary_10_1177_14653125241264295 crossref_primary_10_4103_ijor_ijor_9_21 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13005_025_00483_z crossref_primary_10_1111_idh_12220 crossref_primary_10_69658_sto_2019_010 crossref_primary_10_2319_020221_100_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2010_06_010 crossref_primary_10_4041_kjod_2014_44_4_168 crossref_primary_10_1590_S2176_94512013000500007 crossref_primary_10_1111_ocr_12771 crossref_primary_10_2319_082317_570_1 crossref_primary_10_17567_ataunidfd_982035 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_023_03681_w crossref_primary_10_3390_app10124276 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2009_06_023 crossref_primary_10_12968_ortu_2020_13_2_50 crossref_primary_10_1093_ejo_cjx064 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9051474 crossref_primary_10_1093_ejo_cjt064 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_sodo_2018_04_002 crossref_primary_10_5937_bjdm2201033J crossref_primary_10_4041_kjod_2015_45_2_89 crossref_primary_10_1590_1678_7757_2018_0003 crossref_primary_10_1590_2176_9451_19_4_030_037_int crossref_primary_10_2478_aoj_2010_0004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ortho_2017_06_010 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1601_6343_2012_01542_x crossref_primary_10_1089_pho_2012_3360 crossref_primary_10_1111_ocr_12044 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_28466_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2016_06_036 crossref_primary_10_1093_ejo_cjr032 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2012_10_011 crossref_primary_10_34172_johoe_2210_1509 crossref_primary_10_2319_112414_838_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9072088 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1526_4637_2011_01185_x crossref_primary_10_4041_kjod_2018_48_5_326 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ortho_2021_09_005 crossref_primary_10_1155_2017_5057941 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_26467 crossref_primary_10_1111_ocr_12270 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2013_02_015 crossref_primary_10_3390_app13084929 crossref_primary_10_1093_ejo_cjp123 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina57020171 crossref_primary_10_2174_1874210601812010275 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00056_012_0116_x crossref_primary_10_15171_joddd_2019_043 crossref_primary_10_1093_ejo_cjz068 crossref_primary_10_3390_app13106322 crossref_primary_10_1590_S2176_94512013000300013 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD007859_pub4 crossref_primary_10_2319_042312_338_1 crossref_primary_10_1038_srep17224 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejwf_2017_03_004 crossref_primary_10_1590_pboci_2020_034 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD007859_pub3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2009_11_009 crossref_primary_10_1051_odf_2013303 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfma_2019_05_014 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40510_022_00401_y crossref_primary_10_1179_14653120723292 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.2319/121007-579.1 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Dentistry |
EISSN | 1945-7103 |
EndPage | 50 |
ExternalDocumentID | 19123718 10_2319_121007_579_1 |
Genre | Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 23M 2WC 34H 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 AAYXX ABOCM ACGFO ADBBV AENEX AFFNX AFOSN ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL BCNDV C1A CITATION CS3 E3Z EBS EJD F5P GK1 GROUPED_DOAJ KQ8 OK1 OVT P2P RNS RPM TR2 XSB Y3D ZGI CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1348-10da1488dd71e1c29c049d652422af96f54bfdba75c1da01ba9b86ef97bf72a53 |
ISSN | 0003-3219 |
IngestDate | Thu Sep 04 17:27:45 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:04:40 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:45:44 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:00 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1348-10da1488dd71e1c29c049d652422af96f54bfdba75c1da01ba9b86ef97bf72a53 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
PMID | 19123718 |
PQID | 66803879 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_66803879 pubmed_primary_19123718 crossref_citationtrail_10_2319_121007_579_1 crossref_primary_10_2319_121007_579_1 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2009-01-00 2009-Jan 20090101 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2009-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2009 text: 2009-01-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | The Angle orthodontist |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Angle Orthod |
PublicationYear | 2009 |
References | Miles, P. G. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b10) 2006; 76 Bradley, R. L. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b12) 2007; 132 Bird, S. E. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b14) 2007; 132 Patel, V. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b4) 1992; 19 Polat, O. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b13) 2005; 75 Ngan, P. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b19) 1989; 96 Scheurer, P. A. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b18) 1996; 18 Jones, M. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b1) 1992; 102 Burstone, C. J. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b6) Otasevic, M. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b7) 2006; 130 Marteau, T. M. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b11) 1992; 31 Harradine, N. W. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b9) 2003; 30 Lew, K. K. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b2) 1993; 21 Krishnan, V. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b16) 2007; 29 Fernandes, L. M. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b17) 1998; 59 Sergl, H. G. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b5) 2000; 22 Polat, O. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b8) 2005; 75 Bartlett, B. W. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b15) 2005; 128 Bos, A. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b3) 2005; 27 |
References_xml | – volume: 31 start-page: 301 year: 1992 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b11 article-title: The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). – volume: 76 start-page: 480 year: 2006 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b10 article-title: A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. – volume: 75 start-page: 210 year: 2005 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b8 article-title: Pain control during fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. – volume: 22 start-page: 307 year: 2000 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b5 article-title: Functional and social discomfort during orthodontic treatment: effects on compliance and prediction of patients' adaptation by personality variables. – volume: 128 start-page: 435 year: 2005 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b15 article-title: The influence of a structured telephone call on orthodontic pain and anxiety. – volume: 19 start-page: 47 year: 1992 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b4 article-title: Non-completion of active orthodontic treatment. – volume: 18 start-page: 349 year: 1996 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b18 article-title: Perception of pain as a result of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. – volume: 132 start-page: 511 year: 2007 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b12 article-title: A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of ibuprofen and paracetamol in the control of orthodontic pain. – volume: 59 start-page: 331 year: 1998 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b17 article-title: Pain and discomfort experienced after placement of a conventional or a superelastic NiTi aligning archwire: a randomized clinical trial. – volume: 130 start-page: e9 year: 2006 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b7 article-title: Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of a masticatory bite wafer and avoidance of hard food on pain associated with initial orthodontic tooth movement. – volume: 21 start-page: 31 year: 1993 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b2 article-title: Attitudes and perceptions of adults towards orthodontic treatment in an Asian community. – volume: 102 start-page: 373 year: 1992 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b1 article-title: The pain and discomfort experienced during orthodontic treatment: a randomized controlled clinical trial of two initial aligning arch wires. – volume: 27 start-page: 296 year: 2005 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b3 article-title: Towards a comprehensive model for the study of compliance in orthodontics. – volume: 30 start-page: 262 year: 2003 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b9 article-title: Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? – volume: 29 start-page: 170 year: 2007 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b16 article-title: Orthodontic pain: from causes to management—a review. – volume: 96 start-page: 47 year: 1989 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b19 article-title: Perception of discomfort by patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. – ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b6 article-title: Biomechanics of tooth movement. – volume: 75 start-page: 791 year: 2005 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b13 article-title: Effects of preoperative ibuprofen and naproxen sodium on orthodontic pain. – volume: 132 start-page: 504 year: 2007 ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b14 article-title: Preoperative acetaminophen vs ibuprofen for control of pain after orthodontic separator placement. |
SSID | ssj0025542 |
Score | 1.8192377 |
Snippet | Objectives: To test the hypotheses that (1) there is no difference in the pain experience during the week following initial placement of two orthodontic... To test the hypotheses that (1) there is no difference in the pain experience during the week following initial placement of two orthodontic appliances... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 46 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Dental Alloys Facial Pain - etiology Female Humans Male Nickel Orthodontic Appliance Design Orthodontic Brackets - adverse effects Orthodontic Wires - adverse effects Orthodontics, Corrective - adverse effects Orthodontics, Corrective - instrumentation Pain Measurement Stainless Steel Surveys and Questionnaires Time Factors Titanium |
Subtitle | A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial |
Title | Pain Experience during Initial Alignment with a Self-Ligating and a Conventional Fixed Orthodontic Appliance System |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19123718 https://www.proquest.com/docview/66803879 |
Volume | 79 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaWcoAL4s2Wlw9wqrIkcV4-riioQgJV0Eq9RXbsVJGy2WofEvQn9C_wZ5nxI8kiVgIuUZRYzmq_L5MZe-YbQt7kjFUFz-oAPnZFkAg445kIA6kZr8A_0CrGauTPX7KT8-TTRXoxmdyMspa2Gzmrrv9YV_I_qMI1wBWrZP8B2X5SuADngC8cAWE4_hXGp6LxGv3mBXU1hw0mBKEGQNtc2s1-W8F2tNZtHbRGVMOVJordtPO6-Q4OKG7lQLTaGS1X9FJNWYHVfJ6BJYHPm1oummutfKZ7i6e-xtI0Ahk7vabxc3eJaYz9zOvNiDkL11jldFiIPcZSFtv0cT4kcn8TK1sZ33cEc4lEX90Yv37BR-sX3iazgHnD6WyybTCzwz1rYO165e92H5xUlE1FMbQwD9Kcz6LxMEDtamE4ANFpzHJn8Xd1tv2tW-R2nOd2yx_Dcxe8g9sV--6L-GttEQU--N34sUaE1k606-nsCV-MG3N2n9xz8QedWzI9IBPdPSR3jrWBZPXjEfmJpKIDqaglFXWkoj2pKJKKCrpDKgrUgGtjUlFDKjoiFe1JRR2p6JwOpKIDqagnFTWkekzOP344e38SuA4eQRWxBHWDlYB4u1Aqj3RUxfD6J1xlKfiFsajBRKSJrJUUeVpFSoSRFFwWma55Lus8Fil7Qg66ZaefESoUZ5EKuWRZlaiM84pxndUQ0GgZ1jqckiP_b5eVk7fHLittCWEuwlRamEqAqYym5G0_-srKuuwZ99oDV4Ldxc000enldl1mWYGZH3xKnlo8h3kc_od77zwnd4c34QU52Ky2-iX4thv5ypDuFzFHpsc |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pain+experience+during+initial+alignment+with+a+self-ligating+and+a+conventional+fixed+orthodontic+appliance+system.+A+randomized+controlled+clinical+trial&rft.jtitle=The+Angle+orthodontist&rft.au=Fleming%2C+P+S&rft.au=Dibiase%2C+A+T&rft.au=Sarri%2C+G&rft.au=Lee%2C+R+T&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.issn=0003-3219&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft_id=info:doi/10.2319%2F121007-579.1&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F19123718&rft.externalDocID=19123718 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0003-3219&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0003-3219&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0003-3219&client=summon |