Pain Experience during Initial Alignment with a Self-Ligating and a Conventional Fixed Orthodontic Appliance System A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Objectives: To test the hypotheses that (1) there is no difference in the pain experience during the week following initial placement of two orthodontic appliances (SmartClip™ and Victory™; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif); and (2) there is no difference in the pain experience during removal and insertio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Angle orthodontist Vol. 79; no. 1; pp. 46 - 50
Main Authors Fleming, P. S., DiBiase, A. T., Sarri, G., Lee, R. T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.01.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0003-3219
1945-7103
DOI10.2319/121007-579.1

Cover

Abstract Objectives: To test the hypotheses that (1) there is no difference in the pain experience during the week following initial placement of two orthodontic appliances (SmartClip™ and Victory™; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif); and (2) there is no difference in the pain experience during removal and insertion of orthodontic archwires with these brackets. Materials and Methods: Sixty-six consecutive patients were treated with a self-ligating bracket system (SmartClip™) or a conventional appliance (Victory™) on the basis of computer-generated random allocation. After appliance placement and engagement of a 0.016″ nickel-titanium archwire, pain experience was recorded after 4, 24, and 72 hours and after 7 days with the use of a visual analog system (VAS) questionnaire. At a subsequent visit, participants documented pain experiences during removal and insertion of 0.019 × 0.025″ archwires on an additional 100 mm VAS questionnaire. Independent t -tests and analyses of covariance were used to analyze normally distributed data; the Mann-Whitney U -test was used for skewed distributions. Results: Forty-eight (72.2%) and fifty-one (77.3%) subjects completed the first and second parts of the study, respectively. Bracket type had no influence on pain experience at 4 hours ( P = .958), 24 hours ( P = .289), 72 hours ( P = .569), and 7 days ( P = .756) following appliance placement. However, bracket type significantly influenced pain experience during archwire removal ( P = .001) and insertion ( P = .013). Conclusions: Hypothesis 1 cannot be rejected. The bracket type had no effect on subjective pain experience during the first week after initial placement of two preadjusted orthodontic appliances. Hypothesis 2 was rejected. Significantly greater discomfort was experienced during archwire insertion and removal with the SmartClip™ appliance.
AbstractList Objectives: To test the hypotheses that (1) there is no difference in the pain experience during the week following initial placement of two orthodontic appliances (SmartClip™ and Victory™; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif); and (2) there is no difference in the pain experience during removal and insertion of orthodontic archwires with these brackets. Materials and Methods: Sixty-six consecutive patients were treated with a self-ligating bracket system (SmartClip™) or a conventional appliance (Victory™) on the basis of computer-generated random allocation. After appliance placement and engagement of a 0.016″ nickel-titanium archwire, pain experience was recorded after 4, 24, and 72 hours and after 7 days with the use of a visual analog system (VAS) questionnaire. At a subsequent visit, participants documented pain experiences during removal and insertion of 0.019 × 0.025″ archwires on an additional 100 mm VAS questionnaire. Independent t -tests and analyses of covariance were used to analyze normally distributed data; the Mann-Whitney U -test was used for skewed distributions. Results: Forty-eight (72.2%) and fifty-one (77.3%) subjects completed the first and second parts of the study, respectively. Bracket type had no influence on pain experience at 4 hours ( P = .958), 24 hours ( P = .289), 72 hours ( P = .569), and 7 days ( P = .756) following appliance placement. However, bracket type significantly influenced pain experience during archwire removal ( P = .001) and insertion ( P = .013). Conclusions: Hypothesis 1 cannot be rejected. The bracket type had no effect on subjective pain experience during the first week after initial placement of two preadjusted orthodontic appliances. Hypothesis 2 was rejected. Significantly greater discomfort was experienced during archwire insertion and removal with the SmartClip™ appliance.
To test the hypotheses that (1) there is no difference in the pain experience during the week following initial placement of two orthodontic appliances (SmartClip and Victory; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif); and (2) there is no difference in the pain experience during removal and insertion of orthodontic archwires with these brackets. Sixty-six consecutive patients were treated with a self-ligating bracket system (SmartClip) or a conventional appliance (Victory) on the basis of computer-generated random allocation. After appliance placement and engagement of a 0.016'' nickel-titanium archwire, pain experience was recorded after 4, 24, and 72 hours and after 7 days with the use of a visual analog system (VAS) questionnaire. At a subsequent visit, participants documented pain experiences during removal and insertion of 0.019 x 0.025'' archwires on an additional 100 mm VAS questionnaire. Independent t-tests and analyses of covariance were used to analyze normally distributed data; the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for skewed distributions. Forty-eight (72.2%) and fifty-one (77.3%) subjects completed the first and second parts of the study, respectively. Bracket type had no influence on pain experience at 4 hours (P = .958), 24 hours (P = .289), 72 hours (P = .569), and 7 days (P = .756) following appliance placement. However, bracket type significantly influenced pain experience during archwire removal (P = .001) and insertion (P = .013). Hypothesis 1 cannot be rejected. The bracket type had no effect on subjective pain experience during the first week after initial placement of two preadjusted orthodontic appliances. Hypothesis 2 was rejected. Significantly greater discomfort was experienced during archwire insertion and removal with the SmartClip appliance.
To test the hypotheses that (1) there is no difference in the pain experience during the week following initial placement of two orthodontic appliances (SmartClip and Victory; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif); and (2) there is no difference in the pain experience during removal and insertion of orthodontic archwires with these brackets.OBJECTIVESTo test the hypotheses that (1) there is no difference in the pain experience during the week following initial placement of two orthodontic appliances (SmartClip and Victory; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif); and (2) there is no difference in the pain experience during removal and insertion of orthodontic archwires with these brackets.Sixty-six consecutive patients were treated with a self-ligating bracket system (SmartClip) or a conventional appliance (Victory) on the basis of computer-generated random allocation. After appliance placement and engagement of a 0.016'' nickel-titanium archwire, pain experience was recorded after 4, 24, and 72 hours and after 7 days with the use of a visual analog system (VAS) questionnaire. At a subsequent visit, participants documented pain experiences during removal and insertion of 0.019 x 0.025'' archwires on an additional 100 mm VAS questionnaire. Independent t-tests and analyses of covariance were used to analyze normally distributed data; the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for skewed distributions.MATERIALS AND METHODSSixty-six consecutive patients were treated with a self-ligating bracket system (SmartClip) or a conventional appliance (Victory) on the basis of computer-generated random allocation. After appliance placement and engagement of a 0.016'' nickel-titanium archwire, pain experience was recorded after 4, 24, and 72 hours and after 7 days with the use of a visual analog system (VAS) questionnaire. At a subsequent visit, participants documented pain experiences during removal and insertion of 0.019 x 0.025'' archwires on an additional 100 mm VAS questionnaire. Independent t-tests and analyses of covariance were used to analyze normally distributed data; the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for skewed distributions.Forty-eight (72.2%) and fifty-one (77.3%) subjects completed the first and second parts of the study, respectively. Bracket type had no influence on pain experience at 4 hours (P = .958), 24 hours (P = .289), 72 hours (P = .569), and 7 days (P = .756) following appliance placement. However, bracket type significantly influenced pain experience during archwire removal (P = .001) and insertion (P = .013).RESULTSForty-eight (72.2%) and fifty-one (77.3%) subjects completed the first and second parts of the study, respectively. Bracket type had no influence on pain experience at 4 hours (P = .958), 24 hours (P = .289), 72 hours (P = .569), and 7 days (P = .756) following appliance placement. However, bracket type significantly influenced pain experience during archwire removal (P = .001) and insertion (P = .013).Hypothesis 1 cannot be rejected. The bracket type had no effect on subjective pain experience during the first week after initial placement of two preadjusted orthodontic appliances. Hypothesis 2 was rejected. Significantly greater discomfort was experienced during archwire insertion and removal with the SmartClip appliance.CONCLUSIONSHypothesis 1 cannot be rejected. The bracket type had no effect on subjective pain experience during the first week after initial placement of two preadjusted orthodontic appliances. Hypothesis 2 was rejected. Significantly greater discomfort was experienced during archwire insertion and removal with the SmartClip appliance.
Author Fleming, P. S.
DiBiase, A. T.
Sarri, G.
Lee, R. T.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: P. S.
  surname: Fleming
  fullname: Fleming, P. S.
  organization: a Specialist Registrar in Orthodontics, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
– sequence: 2
  givenname: A. T.
  surname: DiBiase
  fullname: DiBiase, A. T.
  organization: b Consultant Orthodontist, Kent & Canterbury Hospital, London, UK
– sequence: 3
  givenname: G.
  surname: Sarri
  fullname: Sarri, G.
  organization: c PhD Research Student, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
– sequence: 4
  givenname: R. T.
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, R. T.
  organization: d Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19123718$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkUtLLDEUhIMoOj52riUrV7bmpB_pLIdB7xUGFNR1OJ2kx0h3uk0yPv69PYy6uNzVgeKrgjp1SHb94C0hp8AueQ7yCjgwJrJSyEvYITOQRZkJYPkumTHG8iznIA_IYYwvjPGyLPg-OQAJPBdQz0i8R-fp9cdog7NeW2rWwfkVvfUuOezovHMr31uf6LtLzxTpg-3abOlWmDYYejNpi8G_TYgb_OS4cR_W0LuQngczTKKm83HsHG7CHz5jsv0x2Wuxi_bk-x6Rp5vrx8XfbHn353YxX2Ya8qLOgBmEoq6NEWBBc6lZIU1V8oJzbGXVlkXTmgZFqcEggwZlU1e2laJpBccyPyLn29wxDK9rG5PqXdS269DbYR1VVdUsr4WcwLNvcN301qgxuB7Dp_p50wTwLaDDEGOwrdIu4aZwCug6BUxttlDbLdS0hYLJdPGP6Tf3f_gX90WJ-A
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_2319_081009_454_1
crossref_primary_10_1093_ejo_cjt035
crossref_primary_10_4103_jdmimsu_jdmimsu_105_20
crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_352031
crossref_primary_10_3390_app112412013
crossref_primary_10_3390_app10207136
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40510_014_0064_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ortho_2017_06_009
crossref_primary_10_1177_14653125241264295
crossref_primary_10_4103_ijor_ijor_9_21
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13005_025_00483_z
crossref_primary_10_1111_idh_12220
crossref_primary_10_69658_sto_2019_010
crossref_primary_10_2319_020221_100_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2010_06_010
crossref_primary_10_4041_kjod_2014_44_4_168
crossref_primary_10_1590_S2176_94512013000500007
crossref_primary_10_1111_ocr_12771
crossref_primary_10_2319_082317_570_1
crossref_primary_10_17567_ataunidfd_982035
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_023_03681_w
crossref_primary_10_3390_app10124276
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2009_06_023
crossref_primary_10_12968_ortu_2020_13_2_50
crossref_primary_10_1093_ejo_cjx064
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9051474
crossref_primary_10_1093_ejo_cjt064
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_sodo_2018_04_002
crossref_primary_10_5937_bjdm2201033J
crossref_primary_10_4041_kjod_2015_45_2_89
crossref_primary_10_1590_1678_7757_2018_0003
crossref_primary_10_1590_2176_9451_19_4_030_037_int
crossref_primary_10_2478_aoj_2010_0004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ortho_2017_06_010
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1601_6343_2012_01542_x
crossref_primary_10_1089_pho_2012_3360
crossref_primary_10_1111_ocr_12044
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_28466_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2016_06_036
crossref_primary_10_1093_ejo_cjr032
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2012_10_011
crossref_primary_10_34172_johoe_2210_1509
crossref_primary_10_2319_112414_838_1
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9072088
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1526_4637_2011_01185_x
crossref_primary_10_4041_kjod_2018_48_5_326
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ortho_2021_09_005
crossref_primary_10_1155_2017_5057941
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_26467
crossref_primary_10_1111_ocr_12270
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2013_02_015
crossref_primary_10_3390_app13084929
crossref_primary_10_1093_ejo_cjp123
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina57020171
crossref_primary_10_2174_1874210601812010275
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00056_012_0116_x
crossref_primary_10_15171_joddd_2019_043
crossref_primary_10_1093_ejo_cjz068
crossref_primary_10_3390_app13106322
crossref_primary_10_1590_S2176_94512013000300013
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD007859_pub4
crossref_primary_10_2319_042312_338_1
crossref_primary_10_1038_srep17224
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejwf_2017_03_004
crossref_primary_10_1590_pboci_2020_034
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD007859_pub3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2009_11_009
crossref_primary_10_1051_odf_2013303
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfma_2019_05_014
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40510_022_00401_y
crossref_primary_10_1179_14653120723292
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.2319/121007-579.1
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Dentistry
EISSN 1945-7103
EndPage 50
ExternalDocumentID 19123718
10_2319_121007_579_1
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
23M
2WC
34H
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6J9
AAYXX
ABOCM
ACGFO
ADBBV
AENEX
AFFNX
AFOSN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BCNDV
C1A
CITATION
CS3
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
GK1
GROUPED_DOAJ
KQ8
OK1
OVT
P2P
RNS
RPM
TR2
XSB
Y3D
ZGI
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1348-10da1488dd71e1c29c049d652422af96f54bfdba75c1da01ba9b86ef97bf72a53
ISSN 0003-3219
IngestDate Thu Sep 04 17:27:45 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:04:40 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:45:44 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:53:00 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1348-10da1488dd71e1c29c049d652422af96f54bfdba75c1da01ba9b86ef97bf72a53
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 19123718
PQID 66803879
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_66803879
pubmed_primary_19123718
crossref_citationtrail_10_2319_121007_579_1
crossref_primary_10_2319_121007_579_1
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2009-01-00
2009-Jan
20090101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2009-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2009
  text: 2009-01-00
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle The Angle orthodontist
PublicationTitleAlternate Angle Orthod
PublicationYear 2009
References Miles, P. G. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b10) 2006; 76
Bradley, R. L. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b12) 2007; 132
Bird, S. E. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b14) 2007; 132
Patel, V. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b4) 1992; 19
Polat, O. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b13) 2005; 75
Ngan, P. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b19) 1989; 96
Scheurer, P. A. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b18) 1996; 18
Jones, M. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b1) 1992; 102
Burstone, C. J. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b6)
Otasevic, M. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b7) 2006; 130
Marteau, T. M. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b11) 1992; 31
Harradine, N. W. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b9) 2003; 30
Lew, K. K. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b2) 1993; 21
Krishnan, V. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b16) 2007; 29
Fernandes, L. M. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b17) 1998; 59
Sergl, H. G. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b5) 2000; 22
Polat, O. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b8) 2005; 75
Bartlett, B. W. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b15) 2005; 128
Bos, A. (i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b3) 2005; 27
References_xml – volume: 31
  start-page: 301
  year: 1992
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b11
  article-title: The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).
– volume: 76
  start-page: 480
  year: 2006
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b10
  article-title: A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment.
– volume: 75
  start-page: 210
  year: 2005
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b8
  article-title: Pain control during fixed orthodontic appliance therapy.
– volume: 22
  start-page: 307
  year: 2000
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b5
  article-title: Functional and social discomfort during orthodontic treatment: effects on compliance and prediction of patients' adaptation by personality variables.
– volume: 128
  start-page: 435
  year: 2005
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b15
  article-title: The influence of a structured telephone call on orthodontic pain and anxiety.
– volume: 19
  start-page: 47
  year: 1992
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b4
  article-title: Non-completion of active orthodontic treatment.
– volume: 18
  start-page: 349
  year: 1996
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b18
  article-title: Perception of pain as a result of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.
– volume: 132
  start-page: 511
  year: 2007
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b12
  article-title: A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of ibuprofen and paracetamol in the control of orthodontic pain.
– volume: 59
  start-page: 331
  year: 1998
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b17
  article-title: Pain and discomfort experienced after placement of a conventional or a superelastic NiTi aligning archwire: a randomized clinical trial.
– volume: 130
  start-page: e9
  year: 2006
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b7
  article-title: Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of a masticatory bite wafer and avoidance of hard food on pain associated with initial orthodontic tooth movement.
– volume: 21
  start-page: 31
  year: 1993
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b2
  article-title: Attitudes and perceptions of adults towards orthodontic treatment in an Asian community.
– volume: 102
  start-page: 373
  year: 1992
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b1
  article-title: The pain and discomfort experienced during orthodontic treatment: a randomized controlled clinical trial of two initial aligning arch wires.
– volume: 27
  start-page: 296
  year: 2005
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b3
  article-title: Towards a comprehensive model for the study of compliance in orthodontics.
– volume: 30
  start-page: 262
  year: 2003
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b9
  article-title: Self-ligating brackets: where are we now?
– volume: 29
  start-page: 170
  year: 2007
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b16
  article-title: Orthodontic pain: from causes to management—a review.
– volume: 96
  start-page: 47
  year: 1989
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b19
  article-title: Perception of discomfort by patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.
– ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b6
  article-title: Biomechanics of tooth movement.
– volume: 75
  start-page: 791
  year: 2005
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b13
  article-title: Effects of preoperative ibuprofen and naproxen sodium on orthodontic pain.
– volume: 132
  start-page: 504
  year: 2007
  ident: i0003-3219-079-01-0046-b14
  article-title: Preoperative acetaminophen vs ibuprofen for control of pain after orthodontic separator placement.
SSID ssj0025542
Score 1.8192377
Snippet Objectives: To test the hypotheses that (1) there is no difference in the pain experience during the week following initial placement of two orthodontic...
To test the hypotheses that (1) there is no difference in the pain experience during the week following initial placement of two orthodontic appliances...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 46
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Dental Alloys
Facial Pain - etiology
Female
Humans
Male
Nickel
Orthodontic Appliance Design
Orthodontic Brackets - adverse effects
Orthodontic Wires - adverse effects
Orthodontics, Corrective - adverse effects
Orthodontics, Corrective - instrumentation
Pain Measurement
Stainless Steel
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
Titanium
Subtitle A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Title Pain Experience during Initial Alignment with a Self-Ligating and a Conventional Fixed Orthodontic Appliance System
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19123718
https://www.proquest.com/docview/66803879
Volume 79
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaWcoAL4s2Wlw9wqrIkcV4-riioQgJV0Eq9RXbsVJGy2WofEvQn9C_wZ5nxI8kiVgIuUZRYzmq_L5MZe-YbQt7kjFUFz-oAPnZFkAg445kIA6kZr8A_0CrGauTPX7KT8-TTRXoxmdyMspa2Gzmrrv9YV_I_qMI1wBWrZP8B2X5SuADngC8cAWE4_hXGp6LxGv3mBXU1hw0mBKEGQNtc2s1-W8F2tNZtHbRGVMOVJordtPO6-Q4OKG7lQLTaGS1X9FJNWYHVfJ6BJYHPm1oummutfKZ7i6e-xtI0Ahk7vabxc3eJaYz9zOvNiDkL11jldFiIPcZSFtv0cT4kcn8TK1sZ33cEc4lEX90Yv37BR-sX3iazgHnD6WyybTCzwz1rYO165e92H5xUlE1FMbQwD9Kcz6LxMEDtamE4ANFpzHJn8Xd1tv2tW-R2nOd2yx_Dcxe8g9sV--6L-GttEQU--N34sUaE1k606-nsCV-MG3N2n9xz8QedWzI9IBPdPSR3jrWBZPXjEfmJpKIDqaglFXWkoj2pKJKKCrpDKgrUgGtjUlFDKjoiFe1JRR2p6JwOpKIDqagnFTWkekzOP344e38SuA4eQRWxBHWDlYB4u1Aqj3RUxfD6J1xlKfiFsajBRKSJrJUUeVpFSoSRFFwWma55Lus8Fil7Qg66ZaefESoUZ5EKuWRZlaiM84pxndUQ0GgZ1jqckiP_b5eVk7fHLittCWEuwlRamEqAqYym5G0_-srKuuwZ99oDV4Ldxc000enldl1mWYGZH3xKnlo8h3kc_od77zwnd4c34QU52Ky2-iX4thv5ypDuFzFHpsc
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pain+experience+during+initial+alignment+with+a+self-ligating+and+a+conventional+fixed+orthodontic+appliance+system.+A+randomized+controlled+clinical+trial&rft.jtitle=The+Angle+orthodontist&rft.au=Fleming%2C+P+S&rft.au=Dibiase%2C+A+T&rft.au=Sarri%2C+G&rft.au=Lee%2C+R+T&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.issn=0003-3219&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft_id=info:doi/10.2319%2F121007-579.1&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F19123718&rft.externalDocID=19123718
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0003-3219&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0003-3219&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0003-3219&client=summon