THE PROBLEM OF DEFINING VISUAL CULTURE IN THE HISTORY OF CULTURAL STUDIES

Contemporary culture is dominated by visual images, which leads to ‘oculocentrism’ and ‘clip consciousness’. Visual culture is a broad, interdisciplinary field of study. The problem of defining it remains relevant due to the insufficient clarification of the concept of ‘visual’, the lack of a clear...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEpìstemologìčnì doslìdžennâ u fìlosofìï, socìalʹnih ì polìtičnih naukah (Online) Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 132 - 139
Main Authors SHATALOVYCH, Oleksandr, SHATALOVYCH, Inna
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oles Honchar Dnipro National University 29.07.2025
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2618-1274
2618-1282
DOI10.15421/342517

Cover

Abstract Contemporary culture is dominated by visual images, which leads to ‘oculocentrism’ and ‘clip consciousness’. Visual culture is a broad, interdisciplinary field of study. The problem of defining it remains relevant due to the insufficient clarification of the concept of ‘visual’, the lack of a clear distinction from related phenomena and established terminology.The purpose of the study is to explicate the problem of defining visual culture in the history of cultural studies.The historical-comparative and systematic approaches are applied to consider the problem in terminological, historical, theoretical and methodological aspects.The results of the study: it is found that the concept of ‘visual culture’ is as broad as possible, covering artistic works, visual media, everyday practices and images. The evolution of its research field in five stages is characterized: from implicit visual studies of antiquity, through the propedeutic stage to theoretical conceptualization, structuralist orientation and the ‘pictorial’ / ‘iconic turn’. The interdisciplinary nature of visual culture is highlighted. It is noted that visual culture is faced with a lack of methodological clarity and blurred subject matter. The controversy over its disciplinary status and dependence on a limited number of theorists are highlighted.The theoretical significance of the study lies in the explication and systematization of the problem of defining visual culture, clarifying its periodization, which contributes to the understanding of its dynamic nature and the expansion of the categorical apparatus of cultural studies. The practical significance of the study is that understanding the evolution of visual culture allows us to better navigate the oversaturated visual environment, critically reflect on its role in socio-cultural processes and its impact on world perception.The scientific novelty lies in the systematic explication of the problem of defining visual culture through the prism of its historical evolution and the substantiation of five stages of the formation of this field.Prospects for further research include the development of the concept of ‘visual’, the involvement of modern scientific discoveries in the field of vision and the development of research taking into account local languages and traditions.
AbstractList Contemporary culture is dominated by visual images, which leads to ‘oculocentrism’ and ‘clip consciousness’. Visual culture is a broad, interdisciplinary field of study. The problem of defining it remains relevant due to the insufficient clarification of the concept of ‘visual’, the lack of a clear distinction from related phenomena and established terminology.The purpose of the study is to explicate the problem of defining visual culture in the history of cultural studies.The historical-comparative and systematic approaches are applied to consider the problem in terminological, historical, theoretical and methodological aspects.The results of the study: it is found that the concept of ‘visual culture’ is as broad as possible, covering artistic works, visual media, everyday practices and images. The evolution of its research field in five stages is characterized: from implicit visual studies of antiquity, through the propedeutic stage to theoretical conceptualization, structuralist orientation and the ‘pictorial’ / ‘iconic turn’. The interdisciplinary nature of visual culture is highlighted. It is noted that visual culture is faced with a lack of methodological clarity and blurred subject matter. The controversy over its disciplinary status and dependence on a limited number of theorists are highlighted.The theoretical significance of the study lies in the explication and systematization of the problem of defining visual culture, clarifying its periodization, which contributes to the understanding of its dynamic nature and the expansion of the categorical apparatus of cultural studies. The practical significance of the study is that understanding the evolution of visual culture allows us to better navigate the oversaturated visual environment, critically reflect on its role in socio-cultural processes and its impact on world perception.The scientific novelty lies in the systematic explication of the problem of defining visual culture through the prism of its historical evolution and the substantiation of five stages of the formation of this field.Prospects for further research include the development of the concept of ‘visual’, the involvement of modern scientific discoveries in the field of vision and the development of research taking into account local languages and traditions.
Author SHATALOVYCH, Oleksandr
SHATALOVYCH, Inna
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Oleksandr
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7388-9216
  surname: SHATALOVYCH
  fullname: SHATALOVYCH, Oleksandr
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Inna
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8679-9228
  surname: SHATALOVYCH
  fullname: SHATALOVYCH, Inna
BookMark eNo9kE1PwkAQhjdGExGJf2Fvnqo7-9HdHhEKbFKpoa2Jp2a7HwaC1LRe_PcCNZxmMu8zz-G9Q9eH9uARegDyBIJTeGacCpBXaERjUBFQRa8vu-S3aNL3O0IITQCShI2QLlcpftvkL1n6ivMFnqcLvdbrJX7XRTXN8KzKymqTYr3GJ3KlizLffJzIITkiRVnNdVrco5tg9r2f_M8xqhZpOVtFWb7Us2kWWWAgI-OYt56FREqhQuyE8TZQpwzlIkjSBB4cbwKlQBwIKaGhQcQBGmFVQrhjY6QHr2vNrv7utl-m-61bs63Ph7b7rE33s7V7X0MSK6acJ423_PhvhCPByxBbxoiR9uh6HFy2a_u-8-HiA1KfC62HQtkfiiZh4w
Cites_doi 10.31866/2410-1311.42.2023.293704
10.1167/15.2.19
10.1080/00043249.1961.10794032
10.32461/2226-0285.2.2020.222261
10.5840/zfs193651130
10.1515/9780271075747
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOA
DOI 10.15421/342517
DatabaseName CrossRef
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Philosophy
EISSN 2618-1282
EndPage 139
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_196838de0bec45c8a5d0fe7f6c330a7c
10_15421_342517
GroupedDBID AAYXX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CITATION
GROUPED_DOAJ
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1317-ad3ece3f97758f6d5aecf2d8a245f70bf4fd4bf2210d15771b2f56f1b5c8904d3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2618-1274
IngestDate Mon Sep 08 19:52:14 EDT 2025
Wed Sep 10 23:59:28 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1317-ad3ece3f97758f6d5aecf2d8a245f70bf4fd4bf2210d15771b2f56f1b5c8904d3
ORCID 0000-0001-7388-9216
0000-0001-8679-9228
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/196838de0bec45c8a5d0fe7f6c330a7c
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_196838de0bec45c8a5d0fe7f6c330a7c
crossref_primary_10_15421_342517
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-07-29
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-07-29
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-07-29
  day: 29
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Epìstemologìčnì doslìdžennâ u fìlosofìï, socìalʹnih ì polìtičnih naukah (Online)
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Oles Honchar Dnipro National University
Publisher_xml – name: Oles Honchar Dnipro National University
References 19720
19700
19721
19709
19706
19705
19708
19707
19702
19701
19704
19703
19698
19697
19711
19699
19710
19717
19716
19719
19718
19713
19712
19715
19714
References_xml – ident: 19706
– ident: 19697
– ident: 19704
– ident: 19710
  doi: 10.31866/2410-1311.42.2023.293704
– ident: 19712
  doi: 10.1167/15.2.19
– ident: 19699
– ident: 19714
– ident: 19718
  doi: 10.1080/00043249.1961.10794032
– ident: 19716
– ident: 19719
– ident: 19720
– ident: 19701
– ident: 19707
– ident: 19709
– ident: 19705
– ident: 19698
– ident: 19717
  doi: 10.32461/2226-0285.2.2020.222261
– ident: 19713
– ident: 19711
– ident: 19715
– ident: 19700
  doi: 10.5840/zfs193651130
– ident: 19702
– ident: 19703
  doi: 10.1515/9780271075747
– ident: 19721
– ident: 19708
SSID ssj0002911993
Score 2.298941
Snippet Contemporary culture is dominated by visual images, which leads to ‘oculocentrism’ and ‘clip consciousness’. Visual culture is a broad, interdisciplinary field...
SourceID doaj
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Index Database
StartPage 132
Title THE PROBLEM OF DEFINING VISUAL CULTURE IN THE HISTORY OF CULTURAL STUDIES
URI https://doaj.org/article/196838de0bec45c8a5d0fe7f6c330a7c
Volume 8
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV09T8MwELUQUxfEpyhf8sAa1XbsOBnbktCgklZtg8oU2bE9FoTKwL_nnKSoTCys8SmJ3jm-96TLO4TubRQpE0kXsDoGgcKdCOKY8sBxZXWiI0VM0yBbRJOSP63Fem_Ul-8Ja-2BW-AGsEPiMDaWwMO4qGMlDHFWuqgGJa5k7U9fkpA9MeXPYAbfcNI47oJCAJkE2qv9YxYYA6ODkHunrl-laM-xvykt2TE66jghHrbvcoIO7OYU9ea7IQNfZyhfTVI8X8xG0_QZzzL8kGZ5kReP-CVflsMpHpdT376A8wL7yEm-XM0Wrz6yXYGQjvqdozJLV-NJ0A1BCGoKtT1QJrS1DR3wNBG7yAhla8dMrBgXThLtuDNcOwbSzVAhJdXMichRDVglhJvwAh1u3jb2EmGqCXVCUmON5H6ynHahqoGBeYvCUIZ9hHd4VO-t10XlNYKHrGoh66ORx-ln2ZtTNxcgZVWXsuqvlF39x02uUY_5UbxEBiy5QYfbj097C_xgq--arfAN5diwig
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE+PROBLEM+OF+DEFINING+VISUAL+CULTURE+IN+THE+HISTORY+OF+CULTURAL+STUDIES&rft.jtitle=Ep%C3%ACstemolog%C3%AC%C4%8Dn%C3%AC+dosl%C3%ACd%C5%BEenn%C3%A2+u+f%C3%AClosof%C3%AC%C3%AF%2C+soc%C3%ACal%CA%B9nih+%C3%AC+pol%C3%ACti%C4%8Dnih+naukah+%28Online%29&rft.au=SHATALOVYCH%2C+Oleksandr&rft.au=SHATALOVYCH%2C+Inna&rft.date=2025-07-29&rft.issn=2618-1274&rft.eissn=2618-1282&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=139&rft_id=info:doi/10.15421%2F342517&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_15421_342517
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2618-1274&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2618-1274&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2618-1274&client=summon