THE PROBLEM OF DEFINING VISUAL CULTURE IN THE HISTORY OF CULTURAL STUDIES
Contemporary culture is dominated by visual images, which leads to ‘oculocentrism’ and ‘clip consciousness’. Visual culture is a broad, interdisciplinary field of study. The problem of defining it remains relevant due to the insufficient clarification of the concept of ‘visual’, the lack of a clear...
Saved in:
Published in | Epìstemologìčnì doslìdžennâ u fìlosofìï, socìalʹnih ì polìtičnih naukah (Online) Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 132 - 139 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oles Honchar Dnipro National University
29.07.2025
|
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2618-1274 2618-1282 |
DOI | 10.15421/342517 |
Cover
Abstract | Contemporary culture is dominated by visual images, which leads to ‘oculocentrism’ and ‘clip consciousness’. Visual culture is a broad, interdisciplinary field of study. The problem of defining it remains relevant due to the insufficient clarification of the concept of ‘visual’, the lack of a clear distinction from related phenomena and established terminology.The purpose of the study is to explicate the problem of defining visual culture in the history of cultural studies.The historical-comparative and systematic approaches are applied to consider the problem in terminological, historical, theoretical and methodological aspects.The results of the study: it is found that the concept of ‘visual culture’ is as broad as possible, covering artistic works, visual media, everyday practices and images. The evolution of its research field in five stages is characterized: from implicit visual studies of antiquity, through the propedeutic stage to theoretical conceptualization, structuralist orientation and the ‘pictorial’ / ‘iconic turn’. The interdisciplinary nature of visual culture is highlighted. It is noted that visual culture is faced with a lack of methodological clarity and blurred subject matter. The controversy over its disciplinary status and dependence on a limited number of theorists are highlighted.The theoretical significance of the study lies in the explication and systematization of the problem of defining visual culture, clarifying its periodization, which contributes to the understanding of its dynamic nature and the expansion of the categorical apparatus of cultural studies. The practical significance of the study is that understanding the evolution of visual culture allows us to better navigate the oversaturated visual environment, critically reflect on its role in socio-cultural processes and its impact on world perception.The scientific novelty lies in the systematic explication of the problem of defining visual culture through the prism of its historical evolution and the substantiation of five stages of the formation of this field.Prospects for further research include the development of the concept of ‘visual’, the involvement of modern scientific discoveries in the field of vision and the development of research taking into account local languages and traditions. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Contemporary culture is dominated by visual images, which leads to ‘oculocentrism’ and ‘clip consciousness’. Visual culture is a broad, interdisciplinary field of study. The problem of defining it remains relevant due to the insufficient clarification of the concept of ‘visual’, the lack of a clear distinction from related phenomena and established terminology.The purpose of the study is to explicate the problem of defining visual culture in the history of cultural studies.The historical-comparative and systematic approaches are applied to consider the problem in terminological, historical, theoretical and methodological aspects.The results of the study: it is found that the concept of ‘visual culture’ is as broad as possible, covering artistic works, visual media, everyday practices and images. The evolution of its research field in five stages is characterized: from implicit visual studies of antiquity, through the propedeutic stage to theoretical conceptualization, structuralist orientation and the ‘pictorial’ / ‘iconic turn’. The interdisciplinary nature of visual culture is highlighted. It is noted that visual culture is faced with a lack of methodological clarity and blurred subject matter. The controversy over its disciplinary status and dependence on a limited number of theorists are highlighted.The theoretical significance of the study lies in the explication and systematization of the problem of defining visual culture, clarifying its periodization, which contributes to the understanding of its dynamic nature and the expansion of the categorical apparatus of cultural studies. The practical significance of the study is that understanding the evolution of visual culture allows us to better navigate the oversaturated visual environment, critically reflect on its role in socio-cultural processes and its impact on world perception.The scientific novelty lies in the systematic explication of the problem of defining visual culture through the prism of its historical evolution and the substantiation of five stages of the formation of this field.Prospects for further research include the development of the concept of ‘visual’, the involvement of modern scientific discoveries in the field of vision and the development of research taking into account local languages and traditions. |
Author | SHATALOVYCH, Oleksandr SHATALOVYCH, Inna |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Oleksandr orcidid: 0000-0001-7388-9216 surname: SHATALOVYCH fullname: SHATALOVYCH, Oleksandr – sequence: 2 givenname: Inna orcidid: 0000-0001-8679-9228 surname: SHATALOVYCH fullname: SHATALOVYCH, Inna |
BookMark | eNo9kE1PwkAQhjdGExGJf2Fvnqo7-9HdHhEKbFKpoa2Jp2a7HwaC1LRe_PcCNZxmMu8zz-G9Q9eH9uARegDyBIJTeGacCpBXaERjUBFQRa8vu-S3aNL3O0IITQCShI2QLlcpftvkL1n6ivMFnqcLvdbrJX7XRTXN8KzKymqTYr3GJ3KlizLffJzIITkiRVnNdVrco5tg9r2f_M8xqhZpOVtFWb7Us2kWWWAgI-OYt56FREqhQuyE8TZQpwzlIkjSBB4cbwKlQBwIKaGhQcQBGmFVQrhjY6QHr2vNrv7utl-m-61bs63Ph7b7rE33s7V7X0MSK6acJ423_PhvhCPByxBbxoiR9uh6HFy2a_u-8-HiA1KfC62HQtkfiiZh4w |
Cites_doi | 10.31866/2410-1311.42.2023.293704 10.1167/15.2.19 10.1080/00043249.1961.10794032 10.32461/2226-0285.2.2020.222261 10.5840/zfs193651130 10.1515/9780271075747 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION DOA |
DOI | 10.15421/342517 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Philosophy |
EISSN | 2618-1282 |
EndPage | 139 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_196838de0bec45c8a5d0fe7f6c330a7c 10_15421_342517 |
GroupedDBID | AAYXX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1317-ad3ece3f97758f6d5aecf2d8a245f70bf4fd4bf2210d15771b2f56f1b5c8904d3 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2618-1274 |
IngestDate | Mon Sep 08 19:52:14 EDT 2025 Wed Sep 10 23:59:28 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1317-ad3ece3f97758f6d5aecf2d8a245f70bf4fd4bf2210d15771b2f56f1b5c8904d3 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-7388-9216 0000-0001-8679-9228 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/196838de0bec45c8a5d0fe7f6c330a7c |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_196838de0bec45c8a5d0fe7f6c330a7c crossref_primary_10_15421_342517 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-07-29 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-07-29 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2025 text: 2025-07-29 day: 29 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Epìstemologìčnì doslìdžennâ u fìlosofìï, socìalʹnih ì polìtičnih naukah (Online) |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | Oles Honchar Dnipro National University |
Publisher_xml | – name: Oles Honchar Dnipro National University |
References | 19720 19700 19721 19709 19706 19705 19708 19707 19702 19701 19704 19703 19698 19697 19711 19699 19710 19717 19716 19719 19718 19713 19712 19715 19714 |
References_xml | – ident: 19706 – ident: 19697 – ident: 19704 – ident: 19710 doi: 10.31866/2410-1311.42.2023.293704 – ident: 19712 doi: 10.1167/15.2.19 – ident: 19699 – ident: 19714 – ident: 19718 doi: 10.1080/00043249.1961.10794032 – ident: 19716 – ident: 19719 – ident: 19720 – ident: 19701 – ident: 19707 – ident: 19709 – ident: 19705 – ident: 19698 – ident: 19717 doi: 10.32461/2226-0285.2.2020.222261 – ident: 19713 – ident: 19711 – ident: 19715 – ident: 19700 doi: 10.5840/zfs193651130 – ident: 19702 – ident: 19703 doi: 10.1515/9780271075747 – ident: 19721 – ident: 19708 |
SSID | ssj0002911993 |
Score | 2.298941 |
Snippet | Contemporary culture is dominated by visual images, which leads to ‘oculocentrism’ and ‘clip consciousness’. Visual culture is a broad, interdisciplinary field... |
SourceID | doaj crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Index Database |
StartPage | 132 |
Title | THE PROBLEM OF DEFINING VISUAL CULTURE IN THE HISTORY OF CULTURAL STUDIES |
URI | https://doaj.org/article/196838de0bec45c8a5d0fe7f6c330a7c |
Volume | 8 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV09T8MwELUQUxfEpyhf8sAa1XbsOBnbktCgklZtg8oU2bE9FoTKwL_nnKSoTCys8SmJ3jm-96TLO4TubRQpE0kXsDoGgcKdCOKY8sBxZXWiI0VM0yBbRJOSP63Fem_Ul-8Ja-2BW-AGsEPiMDaWwMO4qGMlDHFWuqgGJa5k7U9fkpA9MeXPYAbfcNI47oJCAJkE2qv9YxYYA6ODkHunrl-laM-xvykt2TE66jghHrbvcoIO7OYU9ea7IQNfZyhfTVI8X8xG0_QZzzL8kGZ5kReP-CVflsMpHpdT376A8wL7yEm-XM0Wrz6yXYGQjvqdozJLV-NJ0A1BCGoKtT1QJrS1DR3wNBG7yAhla8dMrBgXThLtuDNcOwbSzVAhJdXMichRDVglhJvwAh1u3jb2EmGqCXVCUmON5H6ynHahqoGBeYvCUIZ9hHd4VO-t10XlNYKHrGoh66ORx-ln2ZtTNxcgZVWXsuqvlF39x02uUY_5UbxEBiy5QYfbj097C_xgq--arfAN5diwig |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE+PROBLEM+OF+DEFINING+VISUAL+CULTURE+IN+THE+HISTORY+OF+CULTURAL+STUDIES&rft.jtitle=Ep%C3%ACstemolog%C3%AC%C4%8Dn%C3%AC+dosl%C3%ACd%C5%BEenn%C3%A2+u+f%C3%AClosof%C3%AC%C3%AF%2C+soc%C3%ACal%CA%B9nih+%C3%AC+pol%C3%ACti%C4%8Dnih+naukah+%28Online%29&rft.au=SHATALOVYCH%2C+Oleksandr&rft.au=SHATALOVYCH%2C+Inna&rft.date=2025-07-29&rft.issn=2618-1274&rft.eissn=2618-1282&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=139&rft_id=info:doi/10.15421%2F342517&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_15421_342517 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2618-1274&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2618-1274&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2618-1274&client=summon |