ResACEUnet: An Improved Transformer Unet Model for 3D Seismic Fault Detection
Detecting fault constitutes a pivotal aspect of seismic interpretation, significantly influencing the outcomes of petroleum and gas exploration. As artificial intelligence advances, convolutional neural network (CNN) has proven effective in detecting faults in seismic interpretation. Nevertheless, t...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of geophysical research. Machine learning and computation Vol. 1; no. 3 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.09.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Detecting fault constitutes a pivotal aspect of seismic interpretation, significantly influencing the outcomes of petroleum and gas exploration. As artificial intelligence advances, convolutional neural network (CNN) has proven effective in detecting faults in seismic interpretation. Nevertheless, the receptive field of a convolutional layer within CNN is inherently limited, focusing on extracting local features, which lead to the detection of fewer and discontinuous fault features. In this study, integrating the local feature extraction capabilities of CNN with the global feature extraction prowess of transformer, we proposed a U‐shaped hybrid architecture model named ResACEUnet (Attention‐Convolution Unet with Efficient block) to detect fault of three‐dimensional (3D) seismic data. In ResACEUnet, we introduced a module called ACE block, which integrates convolution and attention mechanisms. This module enabled the model to simultaneously extract local features and model global contextual information, capturing more accurate fault features. In addition, we utilized a joint loss function named BCEDice loss, which composed of BCE (binary cross‐entropy) loss and dice loss to tackle the challenge of imbalanced positive and negative samples. The model was trained on a synthetic data set, with a range of data augmentation techniques were employed to bolster its generalization capabilities and robustness. We implemented our proposed method on the offshore F3 seismic data from the Netherlands and seismic data from Kerry3D and Parihaka in New Zealand. Compared to conventional popular models such as Unet, ResUnet, and SwinUnetR, ResACEUnet demonstrated superior capabilities in capturing more features and identifying fault with higher accuracy and continuity.
Plain Language Summary
We introduced an end‐to‐end neural network that can directly interpret 3D seismic fault from seismic data without manual processing. This model adopts a U‐shaped architecture, combining the strengths of CNN and transformer, to learn more fault features and improve the accuracy of fault identification. We train the network using synthetic data set, which is generated by convolving random faults, folds, and noise added to reflectivity models with Ricker wavelets. Our model not only exhibits good predictive performance on synthetic data but also effectively captures fault features on multiple different publicly available real data. The identification results of three field‐realistic seismic data demonstrate the model's predictive performance and generalization capabilities.
Key Points
Introduce an improved transformer Unet model for detecting 3D seismic fault
The integration of convolutional neural network with transformer architectures empowers the model to discern and harness an expanded array of fault attributes
We have demonstrated the feasibility of our method on real field data |
---|---|
AbstractList | Detecting fault constitutes a pivotal aspect of seismic interpretation, significantly influencing the outcomes of petroleum and gas exploration. As artificial intelligence advances, convolutional neural network (CNN) has proven effective in detecting faults in seismic interpretation. Nevertheless, the receptive field of a convolutional layer within CNN is inherently limited, focusing on extracting local features, which lead to the detection of fewer and discontinuous fault features. In this study, integrating the local feature extraction capabilities of CNN with the global feature extraction prowess of transformer, we proposed a U‐shaped hybrid architecture model named ResACEUnet (Attention‐Convolution Unet with Efficient block) to detect fault of three‐dimensional (3D) seismic data. In ResACEUnet, we introduced a module called ACE block, which integrates convolution and attention mechanisms. This module enabled the model to simultaneously extract local features and model global contextual information, capturing more accurate fault features. In addition, we utilized a joint loss function named BCEDice loss, which composed of BCE (binary cross‐entropy) loss and dice loss to tackle the challenge of imbalanced positive and negative samples. The model was trained on a synthetic data set, with a range of data augmentation techniques were employed to bolster its generalization capabilities and robustness. We implemented our proposed method on the offshore F3 seismic data from the Netherlands and seismic data from Kerry3D and Parihaka in New Zealand. Compared to conventional popular models such as Unet, ResUnet, and SwinUnetR, ResACEUnet demonstrated superior capabilities in capturing more features and identifying fault with higher accuracy and continuity.
Plain Language Summary
We introduced an end‐to‐end neural network that can directly interpret 3D seismic fault from seismic data without manual processing. This model adopts a U‐shaped architecture, combining the strengths of CNN and transformer, to learn more fault features and improve the accuracy of fault identification. We train the network using synthetic data set, which is generated by convolving random faults, folds, and noise added to reflectivity models with Ricker wavelets. Our model not only exhibits good predictive performance on synthetic data but also effectively captures fault features on multiple different publicly available real data. The identification results of three field‐realistic seismic data demonstrate the model's predictive performance and generalization capabilities.
Key Points
Introduce an improved transformer Unet model for detecting 3D seismic fault
The integration of convolutional neural network with transformer architectures empowers the model to discern and harness an expanded array of fault attributes
We have demonstrated the feasibility of our method on real field data Detecting fault constitutes a pivotal aspect of seismic interpretation, significantly influencing the outcomes of petroleum and gas exploration. As artificial intelligence advances, convolutional neural network (CNN) has proven effective in detecting faults in seismic interpretation. Nevertheless, the receptive field of a convolutional layer within CNN is inherently limited, focusing on extracting local features, which lead to the detection of fewer and discontinuous fault features. In this study, integrating the local feature extraction capabilities of CNN with the global feature extraction prowess of transformer, we proposed a U‐shaped hybrid architecture model named ResACEUnet (Attention‐Convolution Unet with Efficient block) to detect fault of three‐dimensional (3D) seismic data. In ResACEUnet, we introduced a module called ACE block, which integrates convolution and attention mechanisms. This module enabled the model to simultaneously extract local features and model global contextual information, capturing more accurate fault features. In addition, we utilized a joint loss function named BCEDice loss, which composed of BCE (binary cross‐entropy) loss and dice loss to tackle the challenge of imbalanced positive and negative samples. The model was trained on a synthetic data set, with a range of data augmentation techniques were employed to bolster its generalization capabilities and robustness. We implemented our proposed method on the offshore F3 seismic data from the Netherlands and seismic data from Kerry3D and Parihaka in New Zealand. Compared to conventional popular models such as Unet, ResUnet, and SwinUnetR, ResACEUnet demonstrated superior capabilities in capturing more features and identifying fault with higher accuracy and continuity. We introduced an end‐to‐end neural network that can directly interpret 3D seismic fault from seismic data without manual processing. This model adopts a U‐shaped architecture, combining the strengths of CNN and transformer, to learn more fault features and improve the accuracy of fault identification. We train the network using synthetic data set, which is generated by convolving random faults, folds, and noise added to reflectivity models with Ricker wavelets. Our model not only exhibits good predictive performance on synthetic data but also effectively captures fault features on multiple different publicly available real data. The identification results of three field‐realistic seismic data demonstrate the model's predictive performance and generalization capabilities. Introduce an improved transformer Unet model for detecting 3D seismic fault The integration of convolutional neural network with transformer architectures empowers the model to discern and harness an expanded array of fault attributes We have demonstrated the feasibility of our method on real field data |
Author | Zhao, Penghui Zu, Shaohuan Junxing, Cao Ke, Chaofan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Shaohuan orcidid: 0000-0003-0153-1746 surname: Zu fullname: Zu, Shaohuan email: zushaohuan19@cdut.edu.cn organization: Chengdu University of Technology – sequence: 2 givenname: Penghui surname: Zhao fullname: Zhao, Penghui organization: Chengdu University of Technology – sequence: 3 givenname: Chaofan surname: Ke fullname: Ke, Chaofan organization: Chengdu University of Technology – sequence: 4 givenname: Cao orcidid: 0000-0002-5940-7492 surname: Junxing fullname: Junxing, Cao organization: Chengdu University of Technology |
BookMark | eNp9kNtKAzEQhoNUsNbe-QB5AFeTyZ7iXem5tAi1vV5CMoHIHkqyKn37bqkXRdCrGWa-f_7hvye9uqmRkEfOnjkD-QIM4tWCMQYCbkgfpBRRApz1rvo7Mgzho2OEAJazrE82Wwyj8XRfY_tKRzVdVgfffKGhO6_qYBtfoafnLd00BkvaTaiY0Hd0oXKaztRn2dIJtqhb19QP5NaqMuDwpw7IfjbdjRfR-m2-HI_WkebA0wghQyNB2SxXGhKrEWUW29TkLJdorUjjTEprNEsSm4NNtAETo-CdSpo0EwPydLmrfROCR1scvKuUPxacFec0ius0Ohx-4dq16vxw65Ur_xKxi-jblXj816BYzbccUnECKIFwyA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1109_TGRS_2024_3470536 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1365‐2478.2005.00489.x 10.1093/gji/ggz418 10.1190/tle42010008.1 10.1190/1.1817297 10.1190/geo2019‐0375.1 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104509 10.1190/geo2012‐0331.1 10.1007/978‐3‐319‐24574‐4_28 10.5281/zenodo.11516929 10.1046/j.0263‐5046.2001.00142.x 10.1190/1.1444415 10.1109/3DV.2016.79 10.1190/1.1437077 10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104776 10.3389/feart.2023.1047626 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 10.1190/1.1444651 10.1190/geo2018‐0646.1 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Geophysical Research: Machine Learning and Computation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Geophysical Research: Machine Learning and Computation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union. |
DBID | 24P AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.1029/2024JH000232 |
DatabaseName | Wiley Online Library Open Access CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Open Access Journals url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 2993-5210 |
EndPage | n/a |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1029_2024JH000232 JGR126 |
Genre | researchArticle |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China funderid: 42374160; 42330813 |
GroupedDBID | 0R~ 24P AAMMB ACCMX AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS GROUPED_DOAJ M~E WIN AAYXX CITATION |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1216-e27ed92af78ac25fcee974f6d8089eff364799fdc055f82f5cd2d4e31ed99d673 |
IEDL.DBID | 24P |
ISSN | 2993-5210 |
IngestDate | Tue Jul 01 03:43:13 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:07:13 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 20 07:26:06 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
License | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1216-e27ed92af78ac25fcee974f6d8089eff364799fdc055f82f5cd2d4e31ed99d673 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-5940-7492 0000-0003-0153-1746 |
OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029%2F2024JH000232 |
PageCount | 18 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1029_2024JH000232 crossref_citationtrail_10_1029_2024JH000232 wiley_primary_10_1029_2024JH000232_JGR126 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | September 2024 2024-09-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2024 text: September 2024 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Journal of geophysical research. Machine learning and computation |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
References | 2023; 42 2005; 19 2020; 2020 2021; 34 2023; 11 2019; 84 2015; 18 2022 2000 2020; 85 2021 1995; 14 2020 2013; 78 2023; 243 2001; 19 2005; 53 2021; 153 1999; 64 2016 2019; 219 2002 2024 1998; 63 Dorn G. (e_1_2_8_6_1) 2005 e_1_2_8_24_1 Randen T. (e_1_2_8_17_1) 2000 e_1_2_8_25_1 e_1_2_8_26_1 e_1_2_8_27_1 Jiang F. (e_1_2_8_11_1) 2020; 2020 e_1_2_8_3_1 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_5_1 e_1_2_8_7_1 Azad R. (e_1_2_8_4_1) 2021 e_1_2_8_9_1 e_1_2_8_8_1 e_1_2_8_20_1 e_1_2_8_21_1 e_1_2_8_22_1 e_1_2_8_23_1 Pan X. (e_1_2_8_14_1) 2022 e_1_2_8_18_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 e_1_2_8_13_1 Raghu M. (e_1_2_8_16_1) 2021; 34 e_1_2_8_15_1 e_1_2_8_10_1 e_1_2_8_12_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 153 year: 2021 article-title: Deep convolutional neural network for automatic fault recognition from 3D seismic datasets publication-title: Computers & Geosciences – volume: 11 year: 2023 article-title: Transformer assisted dual U‐net for seismic fault detection publication-title: Frontiers in Earth Science – start-page: SEG year: 2002 end-page: 2002 – volume: 34 start-page: 12116 year: 2021 end-page: 12128 article-title: Do vision transformers see like convolutional neural networks? publication-title: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems – start-page: 770 year: 2016 end-page: 778 – volume: 64 start-page: 1468 issue: 5 year: 1999 end-page: 1479 article-title: Eigenstructure‐based coherence computations as an aid to 3‐D structural and stratigraphic mapping publication-title: Geophysics – volume: 18 start-page: 234 year: 2015 end-page: 241 article-title: U‐Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation publication-title: Medical image computing and computer‐assisted intervention–miccai 2015: 18th international conference, munich, germany, october 5‐9, 2015, proceedings, part III – start-page: 565 year: 2016 end-page: 571 – volume: 243 year: 2023 article-title: Current state and future directions for deep learning based automatic seismic fault interpretation: A systematic review publication-title: Earth‐Science Reviews – volume: 78 start-page: O33 issue: 2 year: 2013 end-page: O43 article-title: Methods to compute fault images, extract fault surfaces, and estimate fault throws from 3D seismic images publication-title: Geophysics – year: 2024 article-title: 39c5bb‐miku/ResACEUnet: v1.0.0 publication-title: Zenodo – volume: 14 start-page: 1053 issue: 10 year: 1995 end-page: 1058 article-title: 3‐D seismic discontinuity for faults and stratigraphic features: The coherence cube publication-title: The Leading Edge – volume: 19 year: 2005 – volume: 84 start-page: IM35 issue: 3 year: 2019 end-page: IM45 article-title: Faultseg3D: Using synthetic data sets to train an end‐to‐end convolutional neural network for 3D seismic fault segmentation publication-title: Geophysics – year: 2022 – volume: 85 start-page: WA27 issue: 4 year: 2020 end-page: WA39 article-title: Building realistic structure models to train convolutional neural networks for seismic structural interpretation publication-title: Geophysics – year: 2020 – volume: 53 start-page: 533 issue: 4 year: 2005 end-page: 542 article-title: Semi‐automatic detection of faults in 3D seismic data publication-title: Geophysical Prospecting – volume: 219 start-page: 2097 issue: 3 year: 2019 end-page: 2109 article-title: Multitask learning for local seismic image processing: Fault detection, structure‐oriented smoothing with edge‐preserving, and seismic normal estimation by using a single convolutional neural network publication-title: Geophysical Journal International – start-page: SEG year: 2000 end-page: 2000 – volume: 19 start-page: 85 issue: 2 year: 2001 end-page: 100 article-title: Curvature attributes and their application to 3D interpreted horizons publication-title: First Break – start-page: 815 year: 2022 end-page: 825 – volume: 63 start-page: 1150 issue: 4 year: 1998 end-page: 1165 article-title: 3‐D seismic attributes using a semblance‐based coherency algorithm publication-title: Geophysics – volume: 42 start-page: 8 issue: 1 year: 2023 end-page: 15 article-title: A brief overview of seismic resolution in applied geophysics publication-title: The Leading Edge – volume: 2020 start-page: 1 year: 2020 end-page: 5 article-title: Super resolution of fault plane prediction by a generative adversarial network publication-title: First eage digitalization conference and exhibition – start-page: 2674 year: 2021 end-page: 2683 – ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365‐2478.2005.00489.x – ident: e_1_2_8_26_1 doi: 10.1093/gji/ggz418 – volume: 2020 start-page: 1 year: 2020 ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 article-title: Super resolution of fault plane prediction by a generative adversarial network publication-title: First eage digitalization conference and exhibition – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.1190/tle42010008.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 doi: 10.1190/1.1817297 – ident: e_1_2_8_24_1 doi: 10.1190/geo2019‐0375.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104509 – ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 doi: 10.1190/geo2012‐0331.1 – volume: 34 start-page: 12116 year: 2021 ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 article-title: Do vision transformers see like convolutional neural networks? publication-title: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems – ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 doi: 10.1007/978‐3‐319‐24574‐4_28 – ident: e_1_2_8_27_1 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11516929 – volume-title: Aapg international conference and exhibition, expanded abstracts year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1046/j.0263‐5046.2001.00142.x – ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 – start-page: 2674 volume-title: Proceedings of the ieee/cvf winter conference on applications of computer vision year: 2021 ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 doi: 10.1190/1.1444415 – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 doi: 10.1109/3DV.2016.79 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 doi: 10.1190/1.1437077 – ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104776 – ident: e_1_2_8_23_1 doi: 10.3389/feart.2023.1047626 – start-page: SEG volume-title: Seg international exposition and annual meeting year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 doi: 10.1190/1.1444651 – start-page: 815 volume-title: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR) year: 2022 ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_25_1 doi: 10.1190/geo2018‐0646.1 |
SSID | ssj0003320807 |
Score | 2.2669766 |
Snippet | Detecting fault constitutes a pivotal aspect of seismic interpretation, significantly influencing the outcomes of petroleum and gas exploration. As artificial... |
SourceID | crossref wiley |
SourceType | Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
SubjectTerms | deep learning fault detection semantic segmentation transformer Unet |
Title | ResACEUnet: An Improved Transformer Unet Model for 3D Seismic Fault Detection |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029%2F2024JH000232 |
Volume | 1 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LSwMxEA5SL15EUbE-Sg56EFnczWbz8Fb6sBQqUlvobdlNJlCoW2m3V3-7SXZb6kHBSw7JJIfJYx6Z-QahO0lFbpjiAQuBBzQCFuQk4wE3WiuQRgvhkpNHr2wwpcNZMqsdbi4XpsKH2Dnc3M3w77W74Fm-rsEGHEamtdrpcOABW-wTfOiyax12PqFvOx9LHJOwypgmLkzNSqqwjn23SzztL_BDKu1rqV7M9E_Qca0f4na1oafoAIozNBrDut3pTQson3G7wJUnADSebNVOWGE3il1pswW2PTju4neYrz_mCvezzaLEXSh92FVxjqb93qQzCOo6CIGKSMQCIBy0JJnhIlMkMVauWSvAMC1CIcEYBwEvLVtVmCRGEJMoTTSFOLKzpGY8vkCNYlnAJcKu3piKM6CSaqoZlTyRAigJgQgRmbiJHrd8SFUNEu5qVSxS_1lNZLrPtSa631F_VuAYv9A9eJb-SZQOX8YRYVf_oL1GR663Cvm6QY1ytYFbqyOUecsfhJa3sG07-up9Az4jsq4 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV07T8MwELZQGWBBIECUpwcYEIpIHMcPtqoPQmkrVFqpW5TaZ6lSCahN_z92klZlAIk1-eLhkvOdL3ffh9CtpGJqmOIe84F7NADmTUnKPW60ViCNFsINJ_cHLB7T7iSaVDqnbham5IfYFNycZxT7tXNwV5Cu2AYcSaY9ttNuXDC22D14lzLCnWcS-rYpsoQh8cuRaeL61Gyo8qvmd7vE4_YCP8LSdppaxJnOITqoEkTcKN_oEdqB7Bj1h7BsNNvjDPIn3MhwWQoAjUfrvBMW2N3FTttsju0VHLbwO8yWHzOFO-lqnuMW5EXfVXaCxp32qBl7lRCCpwISMA8IBy1JarhIFYmMDWz2GGCYFr6QYIzjgJfWrsqPIiOIiZQmmkIY2KekZjw8RbXsM4MzhJ3gmApToJJqqhmVPJICKPGBCBGYsI4e1nZIVMUS7sQq5knxt5rIZNtqdXS3QX-V7Bi_4O4Lk_4JSrrPw4Cw839gb9BePOr3kt7L4PUC7TtE2f91iWr5YgVXNmHIp9fFR_ENk8iz9A |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LSwMxEA6iIF5EUbE-c9CDyOJuNpuHt9J2rdWWUlvobdkmEyjUtbTb_2-yuy31oOA1-ZLD5DGTycw3CN1JKiaGKe4xH7hHA2DehKTc40ZrBdJoIVxycrfH2iPaGUfjyuHmcmFKfoiNw82djOK-dgd8rk1FNuA4Mu2rnXbaBWGLvYL3iv8-x-xM-xsfSxgSv8yYJi5MzWoqv4p9t1M8bU_wQyttW6mFmomP0GFlH-J6uaDHaAeyE9QdwLLeaI0yyJ9xPcOlJwA0Hq7NTlhg14tdabMZti04bOIPmC4_pwrH6WqW4ybkRdhVdopGcWvYaHtVHQRPBSRgHhAOWpLUcJEqEhmr1-wrwDAtfCHBGEcBL61YlR9FRhATKU00hTCwo6RmPDxDu9lXBucIu3pjKkyBSqqpZlTySAqgxAciRGDCGnpcyyFRFUm4q1UxS4rPaiKTbanV0P0GPS_JMX7BPRQi_ROUdF4GAWEX_8Deov1-M07eX3tvl-jAAcroryu0my9WcG3NhXxyU-yJb77esyY |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ResACEUnet%3A+An+Improved+Transformer+Unet+Model+for+3D+Seismic+Fault+Detection&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+geophysical+research.+Machine+learning+and+computation&rft.au=Zu%2C+Shaohuan&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Penghui&rft.au=Ke%2C+Chaofan&rft.au=Junxing%2C+Cao&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.issn=2993-5210&rft.eissn=2993-5210&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029%2F2024JH000232&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1029_2024JH000232 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2993-5210&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2993-5210&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2993-5210&client=summon |