ASSESSMENT OF BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES UTILIZED LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMIC VALUATION CASE STUDY OF WOODEN AND STEEL FRAMED HOUSE
Existing Life-Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) approach has looked around only the impact on land area by acquiring feedstock and occupation of factories without sufficiently addressing the importance of assessing ecosystem services. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to propose an assessment met...
Saved in:
Published in | SOCIOTECHNICA Vol. 12; pp. 34 - 42 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English Japanese |
Published |
Sociotechnology Research Network
2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1349-0184 1882-4609 |
DOI | 10.3392/sociotechnica.12.34 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Existing Life-Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) approach has looked around only the impact on land area by acquiring feedstock and occupation of factories without sufficiently addressing the importance of assessing ecosystem services. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to propose an assessment method for ecosystem services using assessment results of existing studies through a case study of wooden and steel framed house used domestic lumber. Thus, firstly we estimated the total impacted land area by each land use type throughout the lifecycle of both a wooden and a steel-framed house. We then made an inventory to quantify the economic value of ecosystem services by each impacted ecosystem type. As a result, we could indicate the basic outline of a future direction for evaluating ecosystem services comprehensively. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Existing Life-Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) approach has looked around only the impact on land area by acquiring feedstock and occupation of factories without sufficiently addressing the importance of assessing ecosystem services. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to propose an assessment method for ecosystem services using assessment results of existing studies through a case study of wooden and steel framed house used domestic lumber. Thus, firstly we estimated the total impacted land area by each land use type throughout the lifecycle of both a wooden and a steel-framed house. We then made an inventory to quantify the economic value of ecosystem services by each impacted ecosystem type. As a result, we could indicate the basic outline of a future direction for evaluating ecosystem services comprehensively. |
Author | HAYASHI, Kiichiro ITO, Hideyuki |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: ITO, Hideyuki organization: Nihon University, Dept. of Transportation Systems Engineering – sequence: 1 fullname: HAYASHI, Kiichiro organization: EcoTopia Science Institute, Nagoya University |
BookMark | eNplkM1Og0AUhSdGE2vtE7iZF6DOHwMskQ46CYWkQ0nqhgzTwWIqGKgL315qTaNxde9Jzvctzg24bLvWAnCH0ZzSgNwPnWm6gzW7tjF6jsmcsgswwb5PHMZRcDn-lAUOwj67BrNhaCqEMPHHGEzAR6iUUGop0hxmMXyQ2UIWYqVkvoFhuoAiytRG5WIJlVgVMhIKrnOZyGexgImMhRNtokTAX5ZvKi3kKkuPOUyOjjRbyggWYbIOc5mlt-Cq1vvBzn7uFKxjkUdPTpI9yihMHIOR1zpb7GHCia8Jp9bX2tdWE2tdj2vNiCHbynPrymVjh9Ye5abihnDuaco85hKPTgE9eU3fDUNv6_K9b950_1liVB7HK_-MV2JSUjZS8Yl6HQ76xZ4Z3R8as7f_GXQCzwWz031pW_oFu9B5zA |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/BF02977848 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2015 Sociotechnology Research Network |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 Sociotechnology Research Network |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.3392/sociotechnica.12.34 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Sociology & Social History |
EISSN | 1882-4609 |
EndPage | 42 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_3392_sociotechnica_12_34 article_sociotechnica_12_0_12_34_article_char_en |
GroupedDBID | 123 2WC ABJNI ACGFS ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CS3 JSF KQ8 RJT AAYXX CITATION |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c107n-d1712628a263e8aa8aea2ee576aa42c2db75fb542623f736cb6c2667a34745273 |
ISSN | 1349-0184 |
IngestDate | Tue Jul 01 01:10:19 EDT 2025 Wed Sep 03 06:16:27 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | false |
Language | English Japanese |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c107n-d1712628a263e8aa8aea2ee576aa42c2db75fb542623f736cb6c2667a34745273 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sociotechnica/12/0/12_34/_article/-char/en |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_3392_sociotechnica_12_34 jstage_primary_article_sociotechnica_12_0_12_34_article_char_en |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2015 2015-00-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2015 text: 2015 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | SOCIOTECHNICA |
PublicationTitleAlternate | SOCIOTECHNICA |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Sociotechnology Research Network |
Publisher_xml | – name: Sociotechnology Research Network |
References | 18) 国土交通省 (2008)『建設資材・労働力需要実態調査』. 2) Costanza, R., Arge, R., Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., Neill, R., Paruelo. J.,Raskin, R., Sutton, P., Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, NATURE, VOL.387, 253-260. 9) Udo de Haes H A et al. (2002). Life-cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice, Pensacola, FLA, USA. SETAC Press. 13) 太田貴大・林希一郎・伊東英幸(2012)「生態系サービスの文化サービスに対する主観的価値の決定要因-愛知県一色干潟における精神的療養と環境教育利用に着目して」『環境情報科学学術研究論文集 』26, 307-312. 14) Hideyuki Ito, Kiichiro Hayashi, Minoru Fujii. (2013). Development of New Sustainable Indicators for EcoTopia Society, Proceeding of International Association for Impact Assessment 2013 (Online Proceedings). 21) 太田貴大・林希一郎・伊東英幸・大場真(2013)「再生生態系の生態系サービスに対する重要度の探索的分析-愛知県豊田市の森林の事例」『環境共生』22, 38-50. 4) DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK). (2007). An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services, Crown, London. 5) Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P. and Van der Belt, M. (1998). The value of the world's services and natural capital, Ecological Economics, 25(1), 3-15. 8) Gabor Doka et al. (2002). The Assessment of Environment all Impacts caused by Land Use in the Life Cycle Assessment of Forestry and Forest Products - Guidelines, Hints and Recommendations-, Final Report of Working Group 2 "Land use" of COST Action E9. 11) Mark Goedkoop and Renilde Spriensma. (2001). The Eco-indicator 99 a damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology Report, Third edition. http://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/misc/EI99_annexe_v3.pdf/ [2014, September 1]. 6) Weidema B P and Lindeijer E. (2001). Physical impacts of land use in product life cycle assessment (Final report of the EURENVIRONLCAGAPS sub-project on land use), Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Management Technical, University of Denmark. 10) 伊坪徳宏・稲葉敦(2005)『ライフサイクル環境影響評価手法-LCA・環境効率・環境会計のための手法・データベース-』産業環境管理協会. 3) Farber, S., C. R. Costanza, M. A. Wilson. (2002). Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services, Ecological Economics, No.41, 375-392. 1) WRI (World Resource Institute). (2000). Ecosystems and Human Well-being Synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC, 137pp.. 12) H. Ito, K. Hayashi, T. Ota. (2012). Evaluation of the Eco-system Services of Isshiki Tidal Flat in Japan, IAIA (International Association for Impact Assessment) 2012 Conference. 20) T. Ota and K. Hayashi. (2011).「Valuing comprehensive ecosystem services in sustainably managed forest: A case study in the eastern Aichi prefecture, Japan」『自然環境復元学会研究発表会発表・講演要旨集』Vol.12, 3-4. 15) Shelton, D., Cork, S., Binning, C., Parry, R., Hairsine, P., Vertessy, R., and Stauffacher, M. (2001). Application of an ecosystem services inventory approach to the Goulburn Broken Catchment, Third Australian Stream Management Conference, Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, 157-162. 19) 日本建築学会 (2006)『建物のLCA指針第3版』日本建築学会. 7) Schenck R. C. (2001). Land Use and Biodiversity Indicators for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Int. J. LCA , 6 (2), 114-117. 16) Ooba, M., Wang, Q., Murakami, S., Kohata, K. (2010). Biogeochemical model (BGC-ES) and its basin-level application for evaluating ecosystem services under forest management practices, Ecological Modeling, vol. 221, 1979-1994. 17) UNEP. (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) Synthesis Report. [http://doc.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/Study%20and%20Reports/Reports/Synthesis%20report/TEEB%20Synthesis%20Report%202010.pdf]. 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
References_xml | – reference: 4) DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK). (2007). An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services, Crown, London. – reference: 6) Weidema B P and Lindeijer E. (2001). Physical impacts of land use in product life cycle assessment (Final report of the EURENVIRONLCAGAPS sub-project on land use), Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Management Technical, University of Denmark. – reference: 3) Farber, S., C. R. Costanza, M. A. Wilson. (2002). Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services, Ecological Economics, No.41, 375-392. – reference: 17) UNEP. (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) Synthesis Report. [http://doc.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/Study%20and%20Reports/Reports/Synthesis%20report/TEEB%20Synthesis%20Report%202010.pdf]. – reference: 12) H. Ito, K. Hayashi, T. Ota. (2012). Evaluation of the Eco-system Services of Isshiki Tidal Flat in Japan, IAIA (International Association for Impact Assessment) 2012 Conference. – reference: 18) 国土交通省 (2008)『建設資材・労働力需要実態調査』. – reference: 1) WRI (World Resource Institute). (2000). Ecosystems and Human Well-being Synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC, 137pp.. – reference: 13) 太田貴大・林希一郎・伊東英幸(2012)「生態系サービスの文化サービスに対する主観的価値の決定要因-愛知県一色干潟における精神的療養と環境教育利用に着目して」『環境情報科学学術研究論文集 』26, 307-312. – reference: 2) Costanza, R., Arge, R., Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., Neill, R., Paruelo. J.,Raskin, R., Sutton, P., Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, NATURE, VOL.387, 253-260. – reference: 19) 日本建築学会 (2006)『建物のLCA指針第3版』日本建築学会. – reference: 20) T. Ota and K. Hayashi. (2011).「Valuing comprehensive ecosystem services in sustainably managed forest: A case study in the eastern Aichi prefecture, Japan」『自然環境復元学会研究発表会発表・講演要旨集』Vol.12, 3-4. – reference: 8) Gabor Doka et al. (2002). The Assessment of Environment all Impacts caused by Land Use in the Life Cycle Assessment of Forestry and Forest Products - Guidelines, Hints and Recommendations-, Final Report of Working Group 2 "Land use" of COST Action E9. – reference: 16) Ooba, M., Wang, Q., Murakami, S., Kohata, K. (2010). Biogeochemical model (BGC-ES) and its basin-level application for evaluating ecosystem services under forest management practices, Ecological Modeling, vol. 221, 1979-1994. – reference: 14) Hideyuki Ito, Kiichiro Hayashi, Minoru Fujii. (2013). Development of New Sustainable Indicators for EcoTopia Society, Proceeding of International Association for Impact Assessment 2013 (Online Proceedings). – reference: 21) 太田貴大・林希一郎・伊東英幸・大場真(2013)「再生生態系の生態系サービスに対する重要度の探索的分析-愛知県豊田市の森林の事例」『環境共生』22, 38-50. – reference: 10) 伊坪徳宏・稲葉敦(2005)『ライフサイクル環境影響評価手法-LCA・環境効率・環境会計のための手法・データベース-』産業環境管理協会. – reference: 5) Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P. and Van der Belt, M. (1998). The value of the world's services and natural capital, Ecological Economics, 25(1), 3-15. – reference: 7) Schenck R. C. (2001). Land Use and Biodiversity Indicators for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Int. J. LCA , 6 (2), 114-117. – reference: 15) Shelton, D., Cork, S., Binning, C., Parry, R., Hairsine, P., Vertessy, R., and Stauffacher, M. (2001). Application of an ecosystem services inventory approach to the Goulburn Broken Catchment, Third Australian Stream Management Conference, Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, 157-162. – reference: 11) Mark Goedkoop and Renilde Spriensma. (2001). The Eco-indicator 99 a damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology Report, Third edition. http://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/misc/EI99_annexe_v3.pdf/ [2014, September 1]. – reference: 9) Udo de Haes H A et al. (2002). Life-cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice, Pensacola, FLA, USA. SETAC Press. – ident: 2 – ident: 3 – ident: 4 – ident: 7 doi: 10.1007/BF02977848 – ident: 1 – ident: 12 – ident: 11 – ident: 10 – ident: 13 – ident: 14 – ident: 15 – ident: 5 doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2 – ident: 6 – ident: 9 – ident: 8 |
SSID | ssib001281849 ssib002484624 ssj0069526 |
Score | 1.5539246 |
Snippet | Existing Life-Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) approach has looked around only the impact on land area by acquiring feedstock and occupation of factories without... |
SourceID | crossref jstage |
SourceType | Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 34 |
SubjectTerms | Contingent Valuation Method Ecosystem Service Life Cycle Assessment Life Cycle Impact Assessment |
Subtitle | CASE STUDY OF WOODEN AND STEEL FRAMED HOUSE |
Title | ASSESSMENT OF BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES UTILIZED LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMIC VALUATION |
URI | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sociotechnica/12/0/12_34/_article/-char/en |
Volume | 12 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | SOCIOTECHNICA, 2015, Vol.12, pp.34-42 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELZg4cAF8RS7POQD4hKyJI4TtycUsqka6DaiSastl8hOXJFFatGqPSy_nnGcV8sKsVyixLInaebLeGY6D4TeUrcQ7soVJgPL2gTpZ5tcgtWae5YjCy6ErJpNnE-98Zx-vnAvDrJLtuI0_3VjXsn_cBXGgK8qS_YWnG2JwgCcA3_hCByG4z_x2E-UNFTl-FXwzqcoPosW4SyJ0mVVNSoM4mSZpOG5kYSzRRSEiTFPo0n0LTwDoTUKzWAZTEKjR6VaNV1Es3iqrv2J0TQ6NBb-ZN75sy675N6NLgPbhfxEaVxtaGUhr3c_yhY4_tJPxlElWcoy_15ebfouB51uWctHh6rwKt3V7VTqMaWkU88a7glV0pOKtbtS76-6mNah5HZAT1M86j-28tM2S_t1sg_2rzaqEOwZRSbbI5LZJHPoXXSPMGarmM8vX3t_E6paWMr-1Fu3N3Sr_nztr9RlqhTRDzc82Z4qc_8StPkmErBSTtJH6GFtVWBfQ-QxuiPXT9BJm4yE32Gdho11VZjrp2jXcR3HI9zHDgYU4BY7uMEObrCDO-zgHpVqVR87uMEObrHzDM1HYRqMzboFh5nbFlubhc1s4pEBJ54jB5wPuORESjBSOackJ4Vg7kq4qq2Bs2KOlwsvB5WPcYcyqmr7PUdH681avkCYFZxyxyHDVQ46uLCEXQBZi3KP8iEYDsfoffM2s5-60kr2F44eo4_6jbeT68_wz8mWXtFOUPmMID5ObnfDl-iB-ha0--0VOtpe7eRrUEi34k0Fqt8hw39A |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ASSESSMENT+OF+BIODIVERSITY+AND+ECOSYSTEM+SERVICES+UTILIZED+LIFE-CYCLE+ASSESSMENT+AND+ENVIRONMENTAL+ECONOMIC+VALUATION&rft.jtitle=Sociotechnica&rft.au=ITO%2C+Hideyuki&rft.au=HAYASHI%2C+Kiichiro&rft.date=2015&rft.issn=1349-0184&rft.eissn=1882-4609&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=42&rft_id=info:doi/10.3392%2Fsociotechnica.12.34&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3392_sociotechnica_12_34 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1349-0184&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1349-0184&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1349-0184&client=summon |