ASSESSMENT OF BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES UTILIZED LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMIC VALUATION CASE STUDY OF WOODEN AND STEEL FRAMED HOUSE

Existing Life-Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) approach has looked around only the impact on land area by acquiring feedstock and occupation of factories without sufficiently addressing the importance of assessing ecosystem services. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to propose an assessment met...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSOCIOTECHNICA Vol. 12; pp. 34 - 42
Main Authors ITO, Hideyuki, HAYASHI, Kiichiro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Japanese
Published Sociotechnology Research Network 2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1349-0184
1882-4609
DOI10.3392/sociotechnica.12.34

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Existing Life-Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) approach has looked around only the impact on land area by acquiring feedstock and occupation of factories without sufficiently addressing the importance of assessing ecosystem services. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to propose an assessment method for ecosystem services using assessment results of existing studies through a case study of wooden and steel framed house used domestic lumber. Thus, firstly we estimated the total impacted land area by each land use type throughout the lifecycle of both a wooden and a steel-framed house. We then made an inventory to quantify the economic value of ecosystem services by each impacted ecosystem type. As a result, we could indicate the basic outline of a future direction for evaluating ecosystem services comprehensively.
AbstractList Existing Life-Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) approach has looked around only the impact on land area by acquiring feedstock and occupation of factories without sufficiently addressing the importance of assessing ecosystem services. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to propose an assessment method for ecosystem services using assessment results of existing studies through a case study of wooden and steel framed house used domestic lumber. Thus, firstly we estimated the total impacted land area by each land use type throughout the lifecycle of both a wooden and a steel-framed house. We then made an inventory to quantify the economic value of ecosystem services by each impacted ecosystem type. As a result, we could indicate the basic outline of a future direction for evaluating ecosystem services comprehensively.
Author HAYASHI, Kiichiro
ITO, Hideyuki
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: ITO, Hideyuki
  organization: Nihon University, Dept. of Transportation Systems Engineering
– sequence: 1
  fullname: HAYASHI, Kiichiro
  organization: EcoTopia Science Institute, Nagoya University
BookMark eNplkM1Og0AUhSdGE2vtE7iZF6DOHwMskQ46CYWkQ0nqhgzTwWIqGKgL315qTaNxde9Jzvctzg24bLvWAnCH0ZzSgNwPnWm6gzW7tjF6jsmcsgswwb5PHMZRcDn-lAUOwj67BrNhaCqEMPHHGEzAR6iUUGop0hxmMXyQ2UIWYqVkvoFhuoAiytRG5WIJlVgVMhIKrnOZyGexgImMhRNtokTAX5ZvKi3kKkuPOUyOjjRbyggWYbIOc5mlt-Cq1vvBzn7uFKxjkUdPTpI9yihMHIOR1zpb7GHCia8Jp9bX2tdWE2tdj2vNiCHbynPrymVjh9Ye5abihnDuaco85hKPTgE9eU3fDUNv6_K9b950_1liVB7HK_-MV2JSUjZS8Yl6HQ76xZ4Z3R8as7f_GXQCzwWz031pW_oFu9B5zA
Cites_doi 10.1007/BF02977848
10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 Sociotechnology Research Network
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 Sociotechnology Research Network
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.3392/sociotechnica.12.34
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Sociology & Social History
EISSN 1882-4609
EndPage 42
ExternalDocumentID 10_3392_sociotechnica_12_34
article_sociotechnica_12_0_12_34_article_char_en
GroupedDBID 123
2WC
ABJNI
ACGFS
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CS3
JSF
KQ8
RJT
AAYXX
CITATION
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c107n-d1712628a263e8aa8aea2ee576aa42c2db75fb542623f736cb6c2667a34745273
ISSN 1349-0184
IngestDate Tue Jul 01 01:10:19 EDT 2025
Wed Sep 03 06:16:27 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Language English
Japanese
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c107n-d1712628a263e8aa8aea2ee576aa42c2db75fb542623f736cb6c2667a34745273
OpenAccessLink https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sociotechnica/12/0/12_34/_article/-char/en
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_3392_sociotechnica_12_34
jstage_primary_article_sociotechnica_12_0_12_34_article_char_en
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015
2015-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2015
  text: 2015
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle SOCIOTECHNICA
PublicationTitleAlternate SOCIOTECHNICA
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Sociotechnology Research Network
Publisher_xml – name: Sociotechnology Research Network
References 18) 国土交通省 (2008)『建設資材・労働力需要実態調査』.
2) Costanza, R., Arge, R., Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., Neill, R., Paruelo. J.,Raskin, R., Sutton, P., Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, NATURE, VOL.387, 253-260.
9) Udo de Haes H A et al. (2002). Life-cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice, Pensacola, FLA, USA. SETAC Press.
13) 太田貴大・林希一郎・伊東英幸(2012)「生態系サービスの文化サービスに対する主観的価値の決定要因-愛知県一色干潟における精神的療養と環境教育利用に着目して」『環境情報科学学術研究論文集 』26, 307-312.
14) Hideyuki Ito, Kiichiro Hayashi, Minoru Fujii. (2013). Development of New Sustainable Indicators for EcoTopia Society, Proceeding of International Association for Impact Assessment 2013 (Online Proceedings).
21) 太田貴大・林希一郎・伊東英幸・大場真(2013)「再生生態系の生態系サービスに対する重要度の探索的分析-愛知県豊田市の森林の事例」『環境共生』22, 38-50.
4) DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK). (2007). An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services, Crown, London.
5) Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P. and Van der Belt, M. (1998). The value of the world's services and natural capital, Ecological Economics, 25(1), 3-15.
8) Gabor Doka et al. (2002). The Assessment of Environment all Impacts caused by Land Use in the Life Cycle Assessment of Forestry and Forest Products - Guidelines, Hints and Recommendations-, Final Report of Working Group 2 "Land use" of COST Action E9.
11) Mark Goedkoop and Renilde Spriensma. (2001). The Eco-indicator 99 a damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology Report, Third edition. http://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/misc/EI99_annexe_v3.pdf/ [2014, September 1].
6) Weidema B P and Lindeijer E. (2001). Physical impacts of land use in product life cycle assessment (Final report of the EURENVIRONLCAGAPS sub-project on land use), Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Management Technical, University of Denmark.
10) 伊坪徳宏・稲葉敦(2005)『ライフサイクル環境影響評価手法-LCA・環境効率・環境会計のための手法・データベース-』産業環境管理協会.
3) Farber, S., C. R. Costanza, M. A. Wilson. (2002). Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services, Ecological Economics, No.41, 375-392.
1) WRI (World Resource Institute). (2000). Ecosystems and Human Well-being Synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC, 137pp..
12) H. Ito, K. Hayashi, T. Ota. (2012). Evaluation of the Eco-system Services of Isshiki Tidal Flat in Japan, IAIA (International Association for Impact Assessment) 2012 Conference.
20) T. Ota and K. Hayashi. (2011).「Valuing comprehensive ecosystem services in sustainably managed forest: A case study in the eastern Aichi prefecture, Japan」『自然環境復元学会研究発表会発表・講演要旨集』Vol.12, 3-4.
15) Shelton, D., Cork, S., Binning, C., Parry, R., Hairsine, P., Vertessy, R., and Stauffacher, M. (2001). Application of an ecosystem services inventory approach to the Goulburn Broken Catchment, Third Australian Stream Management Conference, Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, 157-162.
19) 日本建築学会 (2006)『建物のLCA指針第3版』日本建築学会.
7) Schenck R. C. (2001). Land Use and Biodiversity Indicators for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Int. J. LCA , 6 (2), 114-117.
16) Ooba, M., Wang, Q., Murakami, S., Kohata, K. (2010). Biogeochemical model (BGC-ES) and its basin-level application for evaluating ecosystem services under forest management practices, Ecological Modeling, vol. 221, 1979-1994.
17) UNEP. (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) Synthesis Report. [http://doc.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/Study%20and%20Reports/Reports/Synthesis%20report/TEEB%20Synthesis%20Report%202010.pdf].
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
References_xml – reference: 4) DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK). (2007). An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services, Crown, London.
– reference: 6) Weidema B P and Lindeijer E. (2001). Physical impacts of land use in product life cycle assessment (Final report of the EURENVIRONLCAGAPS sub-project on land use), Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Management Technical, University of Denmark.
– reference: 3) Farber, S., C. R. Costanza, M. A. Wilson. (2002). Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services, Ecological Economics, No.41, 375-392.
– reference: 17) UNEP. (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) Synthesis Report. [http://doc.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/Study%20and%20Reports/Reports/Synthesis%20report/TEEB%20Synthesis%20Report%202010.pdf].
– reference: 12) H. Ito, K. Hayashi, T. Ota. (2012). Evaluation of the Eco-system Services of Isshiki Tidal Flat in Japan, IAIA (International Association for Impact Assessment) 2012 Conference.
– reference: 18) 国土交通省 (2008)『建設資材・労働力需要実態調査』.
– reference: 1) WRI (World Resource Institute). (2000). Ecosystems and Human Well-being Synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC, 137pp..
– reference: 13) 太田貴大・林希一郎・伊東英幸(2012)「生態系サービスの文化サービスに対する主観的価値の決定要因-愛知県一色干潟における精神的療養と環境教育利用に着目して」『環境情報科学学術研究論文集 』26, 307-312.
– reference: 2) Costanza, R., Arge, R., Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., Neill, R., Paruelo. J.,Raskin, R., Sutton, P., Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, NATURE, VOL.387, 253-260.
– reference: 19) 日本建築学会 (2006)『建物のLCA指針第3版』日本建築学会.
– reference: 20) T. Ota and K. Hayashi. (2011).「Valuing comprehensive ecosystem services in sustainably managed forest: A case study in the eastern Aichi prefecture, Japan」『自然環境復元学会研究発表会発表・講演要旨集』Vol.12, 3-4.
– reference: 8) Gabor Doka et al. (2002). The Assessment of Environment all Impacts caused by Land Use in the Life Cycle Assessment of Forestry and Forest Products - Guidelines, Hints and Recommendations-, Final Report of Working Group 2 "Land use" of COST Action E9.
– reference: 16) Ooba, M., Wang, Q., Murakami, S., Kohata, K. (2010). Biogeochemical model (BGC-ES) and its basin-level application for evaluating ecosystem services under forest management practices, Ecological Modeling, vol. 221, 1979-1994.
– reference: 14) Hideyuki Ito, Kiichiro Hayashi, Minoru Fujii. (2013). Development of New Sustainable Indicators for EcoTopia Society, Proceeding of International Association for Impact Assessment 2013 (Online Proceedings).
– reference: 21) 太田貴大・林希一郎・伊東英幸・大場真(2013)「再生生態系の生態系サービスに対する重要度の探索的分析-愛知県豊田市の森林の事例」『環境共生』22, 38-50.
– reference: 10) 伊坪徳宏・稲葉敦(2005)『ライフサイクル環境影響評価手法-LCA・環境効率・環境会計のための手法・データベース-』産業環境管理協会.
– reference: 5) Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P. and Van der Belt, M. (1998). The value of the world's services and natural capital, Ecological Economics, 25(1), 3-15.
– reference: 7) Schenck R. C. (2001). Land Use and Biodiversity Indicators for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Int. J. LCA , 6 (2), 114-117.
– reference: 15) Shelton, D., Cork, S., Binning, C., Parry, R., Hairsine, P., Vertessy, R., and Stauffacher, M. (2001). Application of an ecosystem services inventory approach to the Goulburn Broken Catchment, Third Australian Stream Management Conference, Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, 157-162.
– reference: 11) Mark Goedkoop and Renilde Spriensma. (2001). The Eco-indicator 99 a damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology Report, Third edition. http://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/misc/EI99_annexe_v3.pdf/ [2014, September 1].
– reference: 9) Udo de Haes H A et al. (2002). Life-cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice, Pensacola, FLA, USA. SETAC Press.
– ident: 2
– ident: 3
– ident: 4
– ident: 7
  doi: 10.1007/BF02977848
– ident: 1
– ident: 12
– ident: 11
– ident: 10
– ident: 13
– ident: 14
– ident: 15
– ident: 5
  doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2
– ident: 6
– ident: 9
– ident: 8
SSID ssib001281849
ssib002484624
ssj0069526
Score 1.5539246
Snippet Existing Life-Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) approach has looked around only the impact on land area by acquiring feedstock and occupation of factories without...
SourceID crossref
jstage
SourceType Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 34
SubjectTerms Contingent Valuation Method
Ecosystem Service
Life Cycle Assessment
Life Cycle Impact Assessment
Subtitle CASE STUDY OF WOODEN AND STEEL FRAMED HOUSE
Title ASSESSMENT OF BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES UTILIZED LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMIC VALUATION
URI https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sociotechnica/12/0/12_34/_article/-char/en
Volume 12
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX SOCIOTECHNICA, 2015, Vol.12, pp.34-42
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELZg4cAF8RS7POQD4hKyJI4TtycUsqka6DaiSastl8hOXJFFatGqPSy_nnGcV8sKsVyixLInaebLeGY6D4TeUrcQ7soVJgPL2gTpZ5tcgtWae5YjCy6ErJpNnE-98Zx-vnAvDrJLtuI0_3VjXsn_cBXGgK8qS_YWnG2JwgCcA3_hCByG4z_x2E-UNFTl-FXwzqcoPosW4SyJ0mVVNSoM4mSZpOG5kYSzRRSEiTFPo0n0LTwDoTUKzWAZTEKjR6VaNV1Es3iqrv2J0TQ6NBb-ZN75sy675N6NLgPbhfxEaVxtaGUhr3c_yhY4_tJPxlElWcoy_15ebfouB51uWctHh6rwKt3V7VTqMaWkU88a7glV0pOKtbtS76-6mNah5HZAT1M86j-28tM2S_t1sg_2rzaqEOwZRSbbI5LZJHPoXXSPMGarmM8vX3t_E6paWMr-1Fu3N3Sr_nztr9RlqhTRDzc82Z4qc_8StPkmErBSTtJH6GFtVWBfQ-QxuiPXT9BJm4yE32Gdho11VZjrp2jXcR3HI9zHDgYU4BY7uMEObrCDO-zgHpVqVR87uMEObrHzDM1HYRqMzboFh5nbFlubhc1s4pEBJ54jB5wPuORESjBSOackJ4Vg7kq4qq2Bs2KOlwsvB5WPcYcyqmr7PUdH681avkCYFZxyxyHDVQ46uLCEXQBZi3KP8iEYDsfoffM2s5-60kr2F44eo4_6jbeT68_wz8mWXtFOUPmMID5ObnfDl-iB-ha0--0VOtpe7eRrUEi34k0Fqt8hw39A
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ASSESSMENT+OF+BIODIVERSITY+AND+ECOSYSTEM+SERVICES+UTILIZED+LIFE-CYCLE+ASSESSMENT+AND+ENVIRONMENTAL+ECONOMIC+VALUATION&rft.jtitle=Sociotechnica&rft.au=ITO%2C+Hideyuki&rft.au=HAYASHI%2C+Kiichiro&rft.date=2015&rft.issn=1349-0184&rft.eissn=1882-4609&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=42&rft_id=info:doi/10.3392%2Fsociotechnica.12.34&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3392_sociotechnica_12_34
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1349-0184&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1349-0184&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1349-0184&client=summon