AGITG ASCEND: Randomised, double-blind phase II study of certepetide or placebo added to gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Initial results

• Published in: Journal of clinical oncology Vol. 43; no. 4_suppl; p. 728
• Main Authors: Sjoquist, Katrin, Gebski, Val, Karapetis, Christos Stelios, Lomma, Chris, Burge, Matthew E., Steer, Christopher B., Tebbutt, Niall C, Lee, Belinda, Jackson, Christopher G. C. A., Day, Fiona, Padinharakam, Shamsudheen, Murray, James, Yip, Sonia, Mumford, Jan, Siu, Derrick HW, Lee, Joanna, Gao, Yan Ru, Harris, Marion, Price, Timothy Jay
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: American Society of Clinical Oncology 01.02.2025
• ISSN: 0732-183X; 1527-7755
• DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2025.43.4_suppl.728

728Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (NAB-PAC) is a standard first-line chemotherapy regimen for advanced/metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with median Progression Free Survival (mPFS) and Overall Survival (mOS) of 5.5 & 8.7 in the MPACT trial and 5.6 & 9.2 months (mo) in the NAPOLI 3 trial, respectively. Certepetide (formerly LSTA1 or CEND-1) is a novel cyclic peptide that improves targeted penetration of co-administered drugs into tumor and stroma, leading to potentially increased anti-neoplastic activity. ASCEND is a randomized phase II trial designed to investigate the impact of adding certepetide to GEM/NAB-PAC. (NCT05042128). Methods: Eligible participants (pts) with histologically confirmed advanced PDAC and ECOG 0-1 were randomized 2:1 to receive GEM/NAB-PAC plus certepetide (3.2 mg/kg) or placebo (PLA) on days 1, 8, & 15 of a 28-day cycle. Stratification was by age (<65/≥65 years), ECOG (0/1), presence of liver metastasis (Y/N) and trial site. The primary objective was to determine the effect of adding certepetide to GEM/NAB-PAC on PFS. Objective tumor response rate (OTRR), safety and OS were secondary objectives. This non-comparative phase II design targeted a PFS increase of 17% at 6 mo from 47% to 63%. A sample size of 65 patients in the certepetide arm was expected to have 80% power, with 95% confidence to exclude an uninteresting 6-mo PFS rate of 47%. Results: 95 pts (66 certepetide, 29 PLA) were enrolled between May 2022 to December 2023. 6-mo PFS in the certepetide and PLA groups was 49.0% (95% CI 36.4%, 60.5%) and 40.8 (95% CI 22.6%, 58.3%) respectively, with mPFS of 5.5 mo in both groups. mOS was 12.42 mo for the certepetide and 9.72 mo for the PLA. An OTRR of 38.3% (certepetide) and 26.9% (PLA) was observed. Of note, 4 complete responses were observed in the certepetide group vs. 0 in PLA group. In subjects with ECOG 0, 6 mo PFS was 68.1% (95% CI 48.7%, 81.4%) in the certepetide compared to 36.4% (95% CI 11.2%, 62.7%) in the PLA. Grade ≥3 toxicities were similar in both groups at 16% (certepetide) and 15% (PLA). Conclusions: The addition of certepetide is safe and despite showing no improvement in 6-mo PFS, a possible signal of benefit in OS and OTRR, including the 4 complete responses was observed, warranting further investigation. A further cohort of the ASCEND study evaluating the addition of a second dose of certepetide is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05042128.