Identifying Model-Based and Model-Free Patterns in Behavior on Multi-Step Tasks

Recent years have seen a surge of research into the neuroscience of planning. Much of this work has taken advantage of a two-step sequential decision task developed by Daw et al. (2011), which gives the ability to diagnose whether or not subjects' behavior is the result of planning. Here, we pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inbioRxiv
Main Authors Miller, Kevin J, Brody, Carlos D, Botvinick, Matthew M
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Cold Spring Harbor Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 24.12.2016
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Edition1.2
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2692-8205
2692-8205
DOI10.1101/096339

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Recent years have seen a surge of research into the neuroscience of planning. Much of this work has taken advantage of a two-step sequential decision task developed by Daw et al. (2011), which gives the ability to diagnose whether or not subjects' behavior is the result of planning. Here, we present simulations which suggest that the techniques most commonly used to analyze data from this task may be confounded in important ways. We introduce a new analysis technique, which suffers from fewer of these issues. This technique also presents a richer view of behavior, making it useful for characterizing patterns in behavior in a theory-neutral manner. This allows it to provide an important check on the assumptions of more theory-driven analysis such as agent-based model-fitting.
Bibliography:SourceType-Working Papers-1
ObjectType-Working Paper/Pre-Print-1
content type line 50
ISSN:2692-8205
2692-8205
DOI:10.1101/096339