Searching for resistance genes to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus using high throughput screening
Pine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus), damages and kills pine trees and is causing serious economic damage worldwide. Although the ecological mechanism of infestation is well described, the plant's molecular response to the pathogen is not we...
Saved in:
| Published in | BMC genomics Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 599 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
07.11.2012
BioMed Central BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Pine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus), damages and kills pine trees and is causing serious economic damage worldwide. Although the ecological mechanism of infestation is well described, the plant's molecular response to the pathogen is not well known. This is due mainly to the lack of genomic information and the complexity of the disease. High throughput sequencing is now an efficient approach for detecting the expression of genes in non-model organisms, thus providing valuable information in spite of the lack of the genome sequence. In an attempt to unravel genes potentially involved in the pine defense against the pathogen, we hereby report the high throughput comparative sequence analysis of infested and non-infested stems of Pinus pinaster (very susceptible to PWN) and Pinus pinea (less susceptible to PWN).
Four cDNA libraries from infested and non-infested stems of P. pinaster and P. pinea were sequenced in a full 454 GS FLX run, producing a total of 2,083,698 reads. The putative amino acid sequences encoded by the assembled transcripts were annotated according to Gene Ontology, to assign Pinus contigs into Biological Processes, Cellular Components and Molecular Functions categories. Most of the annotated transcripts corresponded to Picea genes-25.4-39.7%, whereas a smaller percentage, matched Pinus genes, 1.8-12.8%, probably a consequence of more public genomic information available for Picea than for Pinus. The comparative transcriptome analysis showed that when P. pinaster was infested with PWN, the genes malate dehydrogenase, ABA, water deficit stress related genes and PAR1 were highly expressed, while in PWN-infested P. pinea, the highly expressed genes were ricin B-related lectin, and genes belonging to the SNARE and high mobility group families. Quantitative PCR experiments confirmed the differential gene expression between the two pine species.
Defense-related genes triggered by nematode infestation were detected in both P. pinaster and P. pinea transcriptomes utilizing 454 pyrosequencing technology. P. pinaster showed higher abundance of genes related to transcriptional regulation, terpenoid secondary metabolism (including some with nematicidal activity) and pathogen attack. P. pinea showed higher abundance of genes related to oxidative stress and higher levels of expression in general of stress responsive genes. This study provides essential information about the molecular defense mechanisms utilized by P. pinaster and P. pinea against PWN infestation and contributes to a better understanding of PWD. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Background Pine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus), damages and kills pine trees and is causing serious economic damage worldwide. Although the ecological mechanism of infestation is well described, the plant's molecular response to the pathogen is not well known. This is due mainly to the lack of genomic information and the complexity of the disease. High throughput sequencing is now an efficient approach for detecting the expression of genes in non-model organisms, thus providing valuable information in spite of the lack of the genome sequence. In an attempt to unravel genes potentially involved in the pine defense against the pathogen, we hereby report the high throughput comparative sequence analysis of infested and non-infested stems of Pinus pinaster (very susceptible to PWN) and Pinus pinea (less susceptible to PWN). Results Four cDNA libraries from infested and non-infested stems of P. pinaster and P. pinea were sequenced in a full 454 GS FLX run, producing a total of 2,083,698 reads. The putative amino acid sequences encoded by the assembled transcripts were annotated according to Gene Ontology, to assign Pinus contigs into Biological Processes, Cellular Components and Molecular Functions categories. Most of the annotated transcripts corresponded to Picea genes-25.4-39.7%, whereas a smaller percentage, matched Pinus genes, 1.8-12.8%, probably a consequence of more public genomic information available for Picea than for Pinus. The comparative transcriptome analysis showed that when P. pinaster was infested with PWN, the genes malate dehydrogenase, ABA, water deficit stress related genes and PAR1 were highly expressed, while in PWN-infested P. pinea, the highly expressed genes were ricin B-related lectin, and genes belonging to the SNARE and high mobility group families. Quantitative PCR experiments confirmed the differential gene expression between the two pine species. Conclusions Defense-related genes triggered by nematode infestation were detected in both P. pinaster and P. pinea transcriptomes utilizing 454 pyrosequencing technology. P. pinaster showed higher abundance of genes related to transcriptional regulation, terpenoid secondary metabolism (including some with nematicidal activity) and pathogen attack. P. pinea showed higher abundance of genes related to oxidative stress and higher levels of expression in general of stress responsive genes. This study provides essential information about the molecular defense mechanisms utilized by P. pinaster and P. pinea against PWN infestation and contributes to a better understanding of PWD. Pine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus), damages and kills pine trees and is causing serious economic damage worldwide. Although the ecological mechanism of infestation is well described, the plant's molecular response to the pathogen is not well known. This is due mainly to the lack of genomic information and the complexity of the disease. High throughput sequencing is now an efficient approach for detecting the expression of genes in non-model organisms, thus providing valuable information in spite of the lack of the genome sequence. In an attempt to unravel genes potentially involved in the pine defense against the pathogen, we hereby report the high throughput comparative sequence analysis of infested and non-infested stems of Pinus pinaster (very susceptible to PWN) and Pinus pinea (less susceptible to PWN). Four cDNA libraries from infested and non-infested stems of P. pinaster and P. pinea were sequenced in a full 454 GS FLX run, producing a total of 2,083,698 reads. The putative amino acid sequences encoded by the assembled transcripts were annotated according to Gene Ontology, to assign Pinus contigs into Biological Processes, Cellular Components and Molecular Functions categories. Most of the annotated transcripts corresponded to Picea genes-25.4-39.7%, whereas a smaller percentage, matched Pinus genes, 1.8-12.8%, probably a consequence of more public genomic information available for Picea than for Pinus. The comparative transcriptome analysis showed that when P. pinaster was infested with PWN, the genes malate dehydrogenase, ABA, water deficit stress related genes and PAR1 were highly expressed, while in PWN-infested P. pinea, the highly expressed genes were ricin B-related lectin, and genes belonging to the SNARE and high mobility group families. Quantitative PCR experiments confirmed the differential gene expression between the two pine species. Defense-related genes triggered by nematode infestation were detected in both P. pinaster and P. pinea transcriptomes utilizing 454 pyrosequencing technology. P. pinaster showed higher abundance of genes related to transcriptional regulation, terpenoid secondary metabolism (including some with nematicidal activity) and pathogen attack. P. pinea showed higher abundance of genes related to oxidative stress and higher levels of expression in general of stress responsive genes. This study provides essential information about the molecular defense mechanisms utilized by P. pinaster and P. pinea against PWN infestation and contributes to a better understanding of PWD. Doc number: 599 Abstract Background: Pine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus) , damages and kills pine trees and is causing serious economic damage worldwide. Although the ecological mechanism of infestation is well described, the plant's molecular response to the pathogen is not well known. This is due mainly to the lack of genomic information and the complexity of the disease. High throughput sequencing is now an efficient approach for detecting the expression of genes in non-model organisms, thus providing valuable information in spite of the lack of the genome sequence. In an attempt to unravel genes potentially involved in the pine defense against the pathogen, we hereby report the high throughput comparative sequence analysis of infested and non-infested stems of Pinus pinaster (very susceptible to PWN) and Pinus pinea (less susceptible to PWN). Results: Four cDNA libraries from infested and non-infested stems of P. pinaster and P. pinea were sequenced in a full 454 GS FLX run, producing a total of 2,083,698 reads. The putative amino acid sequences encoded by the assembled transcripts were annotated according to Gene Ontology, to assign Pinus contigs into Biological Processes, Cellular Components and Molecular Functions categories. Most of the annotated transcripts corresponded to Picea genes-25.4-39.7%, whereas a smaller percentage, matched Pinus genes, 1.8-12.8%, probably a consequence of more public genomic information available for Picea than for Pinus . The comparative transcriptome analysis showed that when P. pinaster was infested with PWN, the genes malate dehydrogenase, ABA, water deficit stress related genes and PAR1 were highly expressed, while in PWN-infested P. pinea, the highly expressed genes were ricin B-related lectin, and genes belonging to the SNARE and high mobility group families. Quantitative PCR experiments confirmed the differential gene expression between the two pine species. Conclusions: Defense-related genes triggered by nematode infestation were detected in both P. pinaster and P. pinea transcriptomes utilizing 454 pyrosequencing technology. P. pinaster showed higher abundance of genes related to transcriptional regulation, terpenoid secondary metabolism (including some with nematicidal activity) and pathogen attack. P. pinea showed higher abundance of genes related to oxidative stress and higher levels of expression in general of stress responsive genes. This study provides essential information about the molecular defense mechanisms utilized by P. pinaster and P. pinea against PWN infestation and contributes to a better understanding of PWD. Pine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus), damages and kills pine trees and is causing serious economic damage worldwide. Although the ecological mechanism of infestation is well described, the plant's molecular response to the pathogen is not well known. This is due mainly to the lack of genomic information and the complexity of the disease. High throughput sequencing is now an efficient approach for detecting the expression of genes in non-model organisms, thus providing valuable information in spite of the lack of the genome sequence. In an attempt to unravel genes potentially involved in the pine defense against the pathogen, we hereby report the high throughput comparative sequence analysis of infested and non-infested stems of Pinus pinaster (very susceptible to PWN) and Pinus pinea (less susceptible to PWN). Four cDNA libraries from infested and non-infested stems of P. pinaster and P. pinea were sequenced in a full 454 GS FLX run, producing a total of 2,083,698 reads. The putative amino acid sequences encoded by the assembled transcripts were annotated according to Gene Ontology, to assign Pinus contigs into Biological Processes, Cellular Components and Molecular Functions categories. Most of the annotated transcripts corresponded to Picea genes-25.4-39.7%, whereas a smaller percentage, matched Pinus genes, 1.8-12.8%, probably a consequence of more public genomic information available for Picea than for Pinus. The comparative transcriptome analysis showed that when P. pinaster was infested with PWN, the genes malate dehydrogenase, ABA, water deficit stress related genes and PAR1 were highly expressed, while in PWN-infested P. pinea, the highly expressed genes were ricin B-related lectin, and genes belonging to the SNARE and high mobility group families. Quantitative PCR experiments confirmed the differential gene expression between the two pine species. Defense-related genes triggered by nematode infestation were detected in both P. pinaster and P. pinea transcriptomes utilizing 454 pyrosequencing technology. P. pinaster showed higher abundance of genes related to transcriptional regulation, terpenoid secondary metabolism (including some with nematicidal activity) and pathogen attack. P. pinea showed higher abundance of genes related to oxidative stress and higher levels of expression in general of stress responsive genes. This study provides essential information about the molecular defense mechanisms utilized by P. pinaster and P. pinea against PWN infestation and contributes to a better understanding of PWD. Abstract Background Pine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus), damages and kills pine trees and is causing serious economic damage worldwide. Although the ecological mechanism of infestation is well described, the plant’s molecular response to the pathogen is not well known. This is due mainly to the lack of genomic information and the complexity of the disease. High throughput sequencing is now an efficient approach for detecting the expression of genes in non-model organisms, thus providing valuable information in spite of the lack of the genome sequence. In an attempt to unravel genes potentially involved in the pine defense against the pathogen, we hereby report the high throughput comparative sequence analysis of infested and non-infested stems of Pinus pinaster (very susceptible to PWN) and Pinus pinea (less susceptible to PWN). Results Four cDNA libraries from infested and non-infested stems of P. pinaster and P. pinea were sequenced in a full 454 GS FLX run, producing a total of 2,083,698 reads. The putative amino acid sequences encoded by the assembled transcripts were annotated according to Gene Ontology, to assign Pinus contigs into Biological Processes, Cellular Components and Molecular Functions categories. Most of the annotated transcripts corresponded to Picea genes-25.4-39.7%, whereas a smaller percentage, matched Pinus genes, 1.8-12.8%, probably a consequence of more public genomic information available for Picea than for Pinus. The comparative transcriptome analysis showed that when P. pinaster was infested with PWN, the genes malate dehydrogenase, ABA, water deficit stress related genes and PAR1 were highly expressed, while in PWN-infested P. pinea, the highly expressed genes were ricin B-related lectin, and genes belonging to the SNARE and high mobility group families. Quantitative PCR experiments confirmed the differential gene expression between the two pine species. Conclusions Defense-related genes triggered by nematode infestation were detected in both P. pinaster and P. pinea transcriptomes utilizing 454 pyrosequencing technology. P. pinaster showed higher abundance of genes related to transcriptional regulation, terpenoid secondary metabolism (including some with nematicidal activity) and pathogen attack. P. pinea showed higher abundance of genes related to oxidative stress and higher levels of expression in general of stress responsive genes. This study provides essential information about the molecular defense mechanisms utilized by P. pinaster and P. pinea against PWN infestation and contributes to a better understanding of PWD. Pine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus), damages and kills pine trees and is causing serious economic damage worldwide. Although the ecological mechanism of infestation is well described, the plant's molecular response to the pathogen is not well known. This is due mainly to the lack of genomic information and the complexity of the disease. High throughput sequencing is now an efficient approach for detecting the expression of genes in non-model organisms, thus providing valuable information in spite of the lack of the genome sequence. In an attempt to unravel genes potentially involved in the pine defense against the pathogen, we hereby report the high throughput comparative sequence analysis of infested and non-infested stems of Pinus pinaster (very susceptible to PWN) and Pinus pinea (less susceptible to PWN).BACKGROUNDPine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus), damages and kills pine trees and is causing serious economic damage worldwide. Although the ecological mechanism of infestation is well described, the plant's molecular response to the pathogen is not well known. This is due mainly to the lack of genomic information and the complexity of the disease. High throughput sequencing is now an efficient approach for detecting the expression of genes in non-model organisms, thus providing valuable information in spite of the lack of the genome sequence. In an attempt to unravel genes potentially involved in the pine defense against the pathogen, we hereby report the high throughput comparative sequence analysis of infested and non-infested stems of Pinus pinaster (very susceptible to PWN) and Pinus pinea (less susceptible to PWN).Four cDNA libraries from infested and non-infested stems of P. pinaster and P. pinea were sequenced in a full 454 GS FLX run, producing a total of 2,083,698 reads. The putative amino acid sequences encoded by the assembled transcripts were annotated according to Gene Ontology, to assign Pinus contigs into Biological Processes, Cellular Components and Molecular Functions categories. Most of the annotated transcripts corresponded to Picea genes-25.4-39.7%, whereas a smaller percentage, matched Pinus genes, 1.8-12.8%, probably a consequence of more public genomic information available for Picea than for Pinus. The comparative transcriptome analysis showed that when P. pinaster was infested with PWN, the genes malate dehydrogenase, ABA, water deficit stress related genes and PAR1 were highly expressed, while in PWN-infested P. pinea, the highly expressed genes were ricin B-related lectin, and genes belonging to the SNARE and high mobility group families. Quantitative PCR experiments confirmed the differential gene expression between the two pine species.RESULTSFour cDNA libraries from infested and non-infested stems of P. pinaster and P. pinea were sequenced in a full 454 GS FLX run, producing a total of 2,083,698 reads. The putative amino acid sequences encoded by the assembled transcripts were annotated according to Gene Ontology, to assign Pinus contigs into Biological Processes, Cellular Components and Molecular Functions categories. Most of the annotated transcripts corresponded to Picea genes-25.4-39.7%, whereas a smaller percentage, matched Pinus genes, 1.8-12.8%, probably a consequence of more public genomic information available for Picea than for Pinus. The comparative transcriptome analysis showed that when P. pinaster was infested with PWN, the genes malate dehydrogenase, ABA, water deficit stress related genes and PAR1 were highly expressed, while in PWN-infested P. pinea, the highly expressed genes were ricin B-related lectin, and genes belonging to the SNARE and high mobility group families. Quantitative PCR experiments confirmed the differential gene expression between the two pine species.Defense-related genes triggered by nematode infestation were detected in both P. pinaster and P. pinea transcriptomes utilizing 454 pyrosequencing technology. P. pinaster showed higher abundance of genes related to transcriptional regulation, terpenoid secondary metabolism (including some with nematicidal activity) and pathogen attack. P. pinea showed higher abundance of genes related to oxidative stress and higher levels of expression in general of stress responsive genes. This study provides essential information about the molecular defense mechanisms utilized by P. pinaster and P. pinea against PWN infestation and contributes to a better understanding of PWD.CONCLUSIONSDefense-related genes triggered by nematode infestation were detected in both P. pinaster and P. pinea transcriptomes utilizing 454 pyrosequencing technology. P. pinaster showed higher abundance of genes related to transcriptional regulation, terpenoid secondary metabolism (including some with nematicidal activity) and pathogen attack. P. pinea showed higher abundance of genes related to oxidative stress and higher levels of expression in general of stress responsive genes. This study provides essential information about the molecular defense mechanisms utilized by P. pinaster and P. pinea against PWN infestation and contributes to a better understanding of PWD. |
| ArticleNumber | 599 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Santos, Carla S Vasconcelos, Marta W Silva, Ana I Egas, Conceição Pinheiro, Miguel |
| AuthorAffiliation | 1 CBQF – Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Centro Regional do Porto da Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Dr. António Bernardino Almeida, Porto, 4200-072, Portugal 2 Bioinformatics Unit, Biocant, Parque Tecnológico de Cantanhede, Núcleo 04, Lote 03, Cantanhede, 3060-197, Portugal 3 Advanced Services Unit, Biocant, Parque Tecnológico de Cantanhede, Núcleo 04, Lote 03, Cantanhede, 3060-197, Portugal |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 CBQF – Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Centro Regional do Porto da Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Dr. António Bernardino Almeida, Porto, 4200-072, Portugal – name: 2 Bioinformatics Unit, Biocant, Parque Tecnológico de Cantanhede, Núcleo 04, Lote 03, Cantanhede, 3060-197, Portugal – name: 3 Advanced Services Unit, Biocant, Parque Tecnológico de Cantanhede, Núcleo 04, Lote 03, Cantanhede, 3060-197, Portugal |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Carla S surname: Santos fullname: Santos, Carla S – sequence: 2 givenname: Miguel surname: Pinheiro fullname: Pinheiro, Miguel – sequence: 3 givenname: Ana I surname: Silva fullname: Silva, Ana I – sequence: 4 givenname: Conceição surname: Egas fullname: Egas, Conceição – sequence: 5 givenname: Marta W surname: Vasconcelos fullname: Vasconcelos, Marta W |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23134679$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqNkstr3DAQxk1JaR7tvadi6KU9ONXLsn0ppEsfC4FC094KQpbGthavtJXkkvz3lbtJGocEig8eZr75MZpvjrMD6yxk2UuMTjGu-TvMKlwQzFmBaVE2zZPs6DZ1cCc-zI5D2CCEq5qUz7JDQjFlvGqOsp8XIL0ajO3zzvncQzAhSqsg78FCyKPLP0w-yN0AI1g1TCG_vBrdbjBjCqcwNw6mH_I4eDf1w26KeVAewKbK8-xpJ8cAL67_J9mPTx-_r74U518_r1dn50VbVXUsNOMN1VLNT6qV7hSpOsY0akECUwRTWUqOOsRbAi0lpMFdqzrUSKWVZk1JT7L1nqud3IidN1vpr4STRvxNON8L6aNRI4iyrjQg2lCKEWtTUHe6oho46xAQRBPr_Z61m9otaAU2ejkuoMuKNYPo3W9BS0ZIiRJgtQe0xj0CWFaU24rZKTE7JTAVychEeXM9hne_JghRbE1QMI7SgpuCwKQuUUMbVv2HtKJsnm6Wvr4n3bjJ2-RNUvEa87pq6D9VL9PGjO1cmlPNUHFWUoYxL_k84ekDqvRp2BqV7rQzKb9oeLtoSJoIl7GXUwhiffFtqX1114Xb7d0cbhLwvUB5F4KHTigTZTRu3qkZBUZiPqeHFovuNd6wH235A12MESI |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2021_640459 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2021_690857 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11676_021_01416_7 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2016_01859 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10142_019_00717_9 crossref_primary_10_3390_f8080279 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12192_015_0573_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_supflu_2020_104784 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2021_822289 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10530_016_1173_7 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2018_0323 crossref_primary_10_1111_ppa_13827 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00468_024_02594_7 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms222011195 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11738_016_2159_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s11295_015_0899_1 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2164_14_647 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms16035216 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gene_2014_09_014 crossref_primary_10_1093_treephys_tpv046 crossref_primary_10_3390_f11020204 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jplph_2015_03_004 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms140611356 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2021_e06718 crossref_primary_10_1111_eea_12105 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00438_020_01739_w crossref_primary_10_1007_s44154_023_00131_z crossref_primary_10_1111_1755_0998_12464 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2022_916138 crossref_primary_10_3390_cells11203208 crossref_primary_10_1093_treephys_tpac088 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0083542 crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2013_3163 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11676_018_0847_7 crossref_primary_10_1111_pce_14224 crossref_primary_10_1094_PHYTO_01_24_0026_R crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_83445_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_genes15010084 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12864_020_06876_5 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0078063 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms20184520 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0241613 crossref_primary_10_3390_f14030650 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_molbiopara_2022_111460 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2164_15_334 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12870_024_04771_9 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2020_523142 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1186/1471-2229-12-13 10.1093/treephys/tpn034 10.1186/1471-2164-12-368 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.07.012 10.1093/treephys/28.7.1099 10.1186/1471-2164-11-180 10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.6.675 10.1007/s10658-011-9886-z 10.1093/pcp/pcq100 10.1104/pp.110.161612 10.1093/nar/29.1.44 10.1093/nar/gkn785 10.1105/tpc.108.058479 10.1074/jbc.R110.113795 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.02.024 10.1007/BF02348216 10.1371/journal.pone.0022269 10.1093/treephys/tpp002 10.1007/s00425-007-0616-x 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00329.x 10.1074/jbc.M110.202226 10.1038/75556 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.07.014 10.1007/BF00014975 10.1074/jbc.M409823200 10.1105/tpc.104.025684 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00461.x 10.1105/tpc.013854 10.1016/S1360-1385(97)82565-4 10.1007/978-4-431-75655-2_6 10.4161/psb.6.3.14451 10.12681/eh.11606 10.1186/1471-2164-11-296 10.1093/jxb/erq313 10.1021/bi9003759 10.1101/gr.1917404 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2010.00646.x 10.1093/jxb/err287 10.1186/1471-2164-12-366 10.1007/s11103-007-9133-3 10.1007/s11103-009-9576-9 10.1016/j.exppara.2011.04.008 10.1186/1471-2164-12-264 10.1023/A:1006297731456 10.4067/S0716-97602007000400003 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1067 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00786-8 10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.045 10.1104/pp.111.192617 10.2174/138920211795564368 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00772.x 10.1093/jxb/erh185 10.1104/pp.110.167163 10.1104/pp.108.119131 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.09.005 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.05.002 10.1007/s11103-008-9358-9 10.1074/jbc.M111.252619 10.1007/s00284-010-9681-7 10.1163/156854107780739027 10.1186/1471-2105-9-386 10.1186/1471-2229-10-248 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00514-8 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.09.014 10.1093/treephys/27.7.969 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.01.012 10.1074/jbc.M109.014761 10.1074/jbc.274.1.397 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.12.011 10.1007/s10658-009-9574-4 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2012 BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 Santos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copyright ©2012 Santos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 Santos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2012 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2012 Santos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. – notice: Copyright ©2012 Santos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 Santos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ISR 3V. 7QP 7QR 7SS 7TK 7U7 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8FD 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI C1K CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. LK8 M0S M1P M7P P64 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS RC3 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-13-599 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Neurosciences Abstracts Toxicology Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Biological Science Collection Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Medical Database Biological Science Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Genetics Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Genetics Abstracts Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection Chemoreception Abstracts ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Biological Science Collection Toxicology Abstracts ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Entomology Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database Genetics Abstracts MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Biology Economics |
| EISSN | 1471-2164 |
| EndPage | 599 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_587de03933104b0398fd73de64f0e203 PMC3542250 oai_biomedcentral_com_1471_2164_13_599 2862008571 A534116569 23134679 10_1186_1471_2164_13_599 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Comparative Study |
| GeographicLocations | Portugal |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Portugal |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2VQ 2WC 2XV 4.4 53G 5VS 6J9 7X7 88E 8AO 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAHBH AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO IGS IHR INH INR ISR ITC KQ8 LK8 M1P M48 M7P M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS U2A UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB 3V. 7QP 7QR 7SS 7TK 7U7 7XB 8FD 8FK AZQEC C1K DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ K9. P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS RC3 7X8 -A0 ABVAZ ACRMQ ADINQ AFGXO AFNRJ AIXEN C24 5PM PUEGO |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-b778t-d4693dac11868cdfc27f44d0beae4c213a5a60f06b2eb32291fbcf09acdcd4953 |
| IEDL.DBID | RBZ |
| ISSN | 1471-2164 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:30:58 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:24:10 EDT 2025 Wed May 22 07:14:54 EDT 2024 Mon Jul 21 09:28:08 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 19:20:42 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:32:14 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:04:52 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 10:57:38 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 05:57:30 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:45:12 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:22:00 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:51:15 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b778t-d4693dac11868cdfc27f44d0beae4c213a5a60f06b2eb32291fbcf09acdcd4953 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-599 |
| PMID | 23134679 |
| PQID | 1268168793 |
| PQPubID | 44682 |
| PageCount | 1 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_587de03933104b0398fd73de64f0e203 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3542250 biomedcentral_primary_oai_biomedcentral_com_1471_2164_13_599 proquest_miscellaneous_1285093947 proquest_miscellaneous_1273435427 proquest_journals_1268168793 gale_infotracmisc_A534116569 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A534116569 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A534116569 pubmed_primary_23134679 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_1471_2164_13_599 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2164_13_599 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2012-11-07 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-11-07 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2012 text: 2012-11-07 day: 07 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | BMC genomics |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Genomics |
| PublicationYear | 2012 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
| References | GE Schaller (4567_CR27) 2011; 21 C Lottaz (4567_CR74) 2003; 19 S Hunter (4567_CR21) 2008; 37 YB Kim (4567_CR58) 2009; 29 MK Mateyak (4567_CR51) 2010; 285 C Santos (4567_CR59) 2011; 19 H Shin (4567_CR32) 2009; 29 W Grunwald (4567_CR56) 2008; 148 C Iseli (4567_CR75) 1999; 138 LD Daurelio (4567_CR24) 2011; 168 X Tian (4567_CR10) 2011; 62 CL Ho (4567_CR48) 1999; 274 Z Shi (4567_CR23) 2010; 10 G Vandenborre (4567_CR44) 2011; 72 SD Lim (4567_CR67) 2010; 72 S Kopriva (4567_CR42) 2004; 55 DL Lildballe (4567_CR69) 2008; 384 M Hothorn (4567_CR53) 2004; 16 W Li (4567_CR54) 2012; 159 G Drechsel (4567_CR55) 2011; 62 S Liu (4567_CR49) 2007; 64 M Roriz (4567_CR2) 2011; 128 M Ashburner (4567_CR19) 2000; 25 T Tomaz (4567_CR34) 2010; 154 Z Wang (4567_CR8) 2010; 4 E Chancerel (4567_CR12) 2011; 12 WW Lorenz (4567_CR13) 2011; 12 L Huang (4567_CR1) 2010; 127 B Uma (4567_CR66) 2011; 168 M Gil (4567_CR64) 2012; 77 G Poschet (4567_CR41) 2010; 51 MM Mota (4567_CR3) 2008 L Ogé (4567_CR61) 2008; 20 FA Koutroumpa (4567_CR5) 2009; 18 JT Jones (4567_CR4) 2008; 9 T Yang (4567_CR40) 2009; 284 BC Bryksa (4567_CR43) 2011; 286 NM Cecchini (4567_CR50) 2011; 155 Y Ichihara (4567_CR6) 2000; 84 Y Takeuchi (4567_CR7) 2007; 9 B Chevreux (4567_CR73) 2004; 14 ST Villa (4567_CR62) 2006; 128 K Fukuda (4567_CR28) 1997; 2 N Fernández-Pozo (4567_CR11) 2011; 12 TL Parchman (4567_CR17) 2010; 11 NA Stover (4567_CR46) 2011; 6 B Ulker (4567_CR25) 2004; 7 S Pöggeler (4567_CR45) 2011; 12 F Hanawa (4567_CR65) 2001; 57 TN Zeczycki (4567_CR39) 2009; 48 M Galan (4567_CR18) 2010; 11 H Ruwe (4567_CR68) 2011; 168 Y Yamauchi (4567_CR33) 2011; 286 M Tadege (4567_CR38) 1998; 16 M Nose (4567_CR14) 2011; 41 AB Sabater-Jara (4567_CR52) 2011; 6 G Baermann (4567_CR70) 1917; 57 S Mkrtchian (4567_CR26) 1998; 431 S-M Kim (4567_CR30) 2008; 227 K Fukuda (4567_CR29) 2007; 27 J-C Kader (4567_CR37) 1997; 2 K Futai (4567_CR71) 1979; 51 T Hirao (4567_CR15) 2012; 12 CSS Santos (4567_CR16) 2012; 132 R Apweiler (4567_CR20) 2001; 29 F Meyer (4567_CR22) 2008; 9 SI Beale (4567_CR60) 1999; 60 B Çakir (4567_CR63) 2003; 15 G le Provost (4567_CR72) 2007; 40 T Kikuchi (4567_CR9) 2007; 155 SF Altschul (4567_CR76) 1990; 215 G Soto (4567_CR31) 2011; 62 CJ Nairn (4567_CR35) 2008; 28 K Herbers (4567_CR36) 1995; 29 Y Hirano (4567_CR47) 2005; 280 C Manzano (4567_CR57) 2008; 68 |
| References_xml | – volume: 4 start-page: 437 issue: 6 year: 2010 ident: 4567_CR8 publication-title: Afr J Microbiol Res – volume: 12 start-page: 13 year: 2012 ident: 4567_CR15 publication-title: BMC Plant Biol doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-13 – volume: 29 start-page: 411 issue: 3 year: 2009 ident: 4567_CR32 publication-title: Tree Physiol doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpn034 – volume: 12 start-page: 368 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR12 publication-title: BMC Genomics doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-368 – volume: 7 start-page: 491 issue: 5 year: 2004 ident: 4567_CR25 publication-title: Curr Opin Plant Biol doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.07.012 – volume: 51 start-page: 23 year: 1979 ident: 4567_CR71 publication-title: Bull Kyoto Uni For – volume: 28 start-page: 1099 issue: 7 year: 2008 ident: 4567_CR35 publication-title: Tree Physiol doi: 10.1093/treephys/28.7.1099 – volume: 11 start-page: 180 year: 2010 ident: 4567_CR17 publication-title: BMC Genomics doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-180 – volume: 84 start-page: 675 year: 2000 ident: 4567_CR6 publication-title: Plant Dis doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.6.675 – volume: 132 start-page: 407 year: 2012 ident: 4567_CR16 publication-title: Eur J Plant Pathol doi: 10.1007/s10658-011-9886-z – volume: 51 start-page: 1571 issue: 9 year: 2010 ident: 4567_CR41 publication-title: Plant Cell Physiol doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq100 – volume: 154 start-page: 1143 year: 2010 ident: 4567_CR34 publication-title: Plant Physiol doi: 10.1104/pp.110.161612 – volume: 29 start-page: 44 year: 2001 ident: 4567_CR20 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/29.1.44 – volume: 37 start-page: 211 year: 2008 ident: 4567_CR21 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn785 – volume: 20 start-page: 3022 issue: 11 year: 2008 ident: 4567_CR61 publication-title: Plant Cell doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.058479 – volume: 285 start-page: 21209 issue: 28 year: 2010 ident: 4567_CR51 publication-title: J Biol Chem doi: 10.1074/jbc.R110.113795 – volume: 72 start-page: 1538 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR44 publication-title: Phytochemistry doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.02.024 – volume: 2 start-page: 171 year: 1997 ident: 4567_CR28 publication-title: J For Res doi: 10.1007/BF02348216 – volume: 6 start-page: e22269 issue: 8 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR46 publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022269 – volume: 29 start-page: 737 issue: 5 year: 2009 ident: 4567_CR58 publication-title: Tree Physiol doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpp002 – volume: 227 start-page: 287 year: 2008 ident: 4567_CR30 publication-title: Planta doi: 10.1007/s00425-007-0616-x – volume: 16 start-page: 661 issue: 6 year: 1998 ident: 4567_CR38 publication-title: Plant J doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00329.x – volume: 286 start-page: 6999 issue: 9 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR33 publication-title: J Biol Chem doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.202226 – volume: 25 start-page: 25 year: 2000 ident: 4567_CR19 publication-title: Nature Genet doi: 10.1038/75556 – volume: 168 start-page: 382 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR24 publication-title: J Plant Physiol doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.07.014 – volume: 29 start-page: 1027 issue: 5 year: 1995 ident: 4567_CR36 publication-title: Plant Mol Biol doi: 10.1007/BF00014975 – volume: 280 start-page: 9653 year: 2005 ident: 4567_CR47 publication-title: J Biol Chem doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409823200 – volume: 16 start-page: 3437 issue: 12 year: 2004 ident: 4567_CR53 publication-title: Plant Cell doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.025684 – volume: 19 start-page: 99 issue: (1 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR59 publication-title: Silva Lusitana – volume: 9 start-page: 357 issue: 3 year: 2008 ident: 4567_CR4 publication-title: Mol Plant Pathol doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00461.x – volume: 15 start-page: 2165 issue: 9 year: 2003 ident: 4567_CR63 publication-title: Plant Cell doi: 10.1105/tpc.013854 – volume: 2 start-page: 66 issue: 2 year: 1997 ident: 4567_CR37 publication-title: Trends Plant Sci doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(97)82565-4 – start-page: 33 volume-title: Pine Wilt Disease year: 2008 ident: 4567_CR3 doi: 10.1007/978-4-431-75655-2_6 – volume: 6 start-page: 440 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR52 publication-title: Plant Signal Behav doi: 10.4161/psb.6.3.14451 – volume: 18 start-page: 35 year: 2009 ident: 4567_CR5 publication-title: Entomologia Hellenica doi: 10.12681/eh.11606 – volume: 11 start-page: 296 year: 2010 ident: 4567_CR18 publication-title: BMC Genomics doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-296 – volume: 62 start-page: 775 issue: 2 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR55 publication-title: J Exp Bot doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq313 – volume: 48 start-page: 4305 issue: 20 year: 2009 ident: 4567_CR39 publication-title: Biochemistry doi: 10.1021/bi9003759 – volume: 14 start-page: 1147 year: 2004 ident: 4567_CR73 publication-title: Genome Res doi: 10.1101/gr.1917404 – volume: 41 start-page: 143 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR14 publication-title: For Path doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2010.00646.x – volume: 62 start-page: 5699 issue: 15 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR31 publication-title: J Exp Bot doi: 10.1093/jxb/err287 – volume: 138 start-page: 48 year: 1999 ident: 4567_CR75 publication-title: Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol – volume: 12 start-page: 366 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR11 publication-title: BMC Genomics doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-366 – volume: 64 start-page: 49 year: 2007 ident: 4567_CR49 publication-title: Plant Mol Biol doi: 10.1007/s11103-007-9133-3 – volume: 72 start-page: 369 year: 2010 ident: 4567_CR67 publication-title: Plant Mol Biol doi: 10.1007/s11103-009-9576-9 – volume: 128 start-page: 357 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR2 publication-title: Exp Parasitol doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2011.04.008 – volume: 12 start-page: 264 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR13 publication-title: BMC Genomics doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-264 – volume: 60 start-page: 43 year: 1999 ident: 4567_CR60 publication-title: Photosynth Res doi: 10.1023/A:1006297731456 – volume: 40 start-page: 291 year: 2007 ident: 4567_CR72 publication-title: Biol Res doi: 10.4067/S0716-97602007000400003 – volume: 19 start-page: ii103 issue: 2 year: 2003 ident: 4567_CR74 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1067 – volume: 431 start-page: 322 issue: 3 year: 1998 ident: 4567_CR26 publication-title: FEBS Lett doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00786-8 – volume: 21 start-page: 320 issue: 9 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR27 publication-title: Curr Biol doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.045 – volume: 159 start-page: 239 year: 2012 ident: 4567_CR54 publication-title: Plant Physiol doi: 10.1104/pp.111.192617 – volume: 12 start-page: 95 issue: 2 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR45 publication-title: Curr Genomics doi: 10.2174/138920211795564368 – volume: 215 start-page: 403 year: 1990 ident: 4567_CR76 publication-title: J Mol Biol doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 – volume: 128 start-page: 581 issue: 4 year: 2006 ident: 4567_CR62 publication-title: Physiol Plant doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00772.x – volume: 57 start-page: 131 year: 1917 ident: 4567_CR70 publication-title: Geneesk, Tijdschr, Ned-Indie – volume: 55 start-page: 1775 issue: 404 year: 2004 ident: 4567_CR42 publication-title: J Exp Bot doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh185 – volume: 155 start-page: 1947 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR50 publication-title: Plant Physiol doi: 10.1104/pp.110.167163 – volume: 148 start-page: 358 year: 2008 ident: 4567_CR56 publication-title: Plant Physiol doi: 10.1104/pp.108.119131 – volume: 168 start-page: 2141 issue: 18 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR66 publication-title: J Plant Physiol doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.09.005 – volume: 155 start-page: 9 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: 4567_CR9 publication-title: Mol Biochem Parasitol doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.05.002 – volume: 68 start-page: 145 year: 2008 ident: 4567_CR57 publication-title: Plant Mol Biol doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9358-9 – volume: 286 start-page: 28265 issue: 32 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR43 publication-title: J Biol Chem doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.252619 – volume: 62 start-page: 117 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR10 publication-title: Curr Microbiol doi: 10.1007/s00284-010-9681-7 – volume: 9 start-page: 243 issue: 2 year: 2007 ident: 4567_CR7 publication-title: Nematology doi: 10.1163/156854107780739027 – volume: 9 start-page: 386 year: 2008 ident: 4567_CR22 publication-title: BMC Bioinforma doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-386 – volume: 10 start-page: 248 year: 2010 ident: 4567_CR23 publication-title: BMC Plant Biol doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-248 – volume: 57 start-page: 223 year: 2001 ident: 4567_CR65 publication-title: Phytochemistry doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00514-8 – volume: 384 start-page: 9 year: 2008 ident: 4567_CR69 publication-title: J Mol Biol doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.09.014 – volume: 27 start-page: 969 issue: 7 year: 2007 ident: 4567_CR29 publication-title: Tree Physiol doi: 10.1093/treephys/27.7.969 – volume: 168 start-page: 1361 issue: 12 year: 2011 ident: 4567_CR68 publication-title: J Plant Physiol doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.01.012 – volume: 284 start-page: 21526 issue: 32 year: 2009 ident: 4567_CR40 publication-title: J Biol Chem doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.014761 – volume: 274 start-page: 397 year: 1999 ident: 4567_CR48 publication-title: J Biol Chem doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.1.397 – volume: 77 start-page: 89 year: 2012 ident: 4567_CR64 publication-title: Phytochemistry doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.12.011 – volume: 127 start-page: 89 year: 2010 ident: 4567_CR1 publication-title: Eur J Plant Pathol doi: 10.1007/s10658-009-9574-4 |
| SSID | ssj0017825 |
| Score | 2.281706 |
| Snippet | Pine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus), damages and kills pine trees and is causing serious economic damage... Background Pine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus), damages and kills pine trees and is causing serious... Doc number: 599 Abstract Background: Pine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus) , damages and kills pine trees... Background: Pine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus), damages and kills pine trees and is causing serious... BACKGROUND: Pine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus), damages and kills pine trees and is causing serious... Abstract Background Pine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus), damages and kills pine trees and is causing... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral biomedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | 599 |
| SubjectTerms | Abundance Amino acids Analysis Animals Base Sequence Bursaphelenchus xylophilus Defense mechanisms Disease Resistance - genetics Economics Gene expression Gene Expression Profiling Gene Library Gene regulation Genes Genetic aspects Genetic transcription Genomes Genomics Health aspects high-throughput screening High-throughput screening (Biochemical assaying) High-Throughput Screening Assays Infestation Lectins Metabolism Molecular Sequence Data Nematoda Nematode Infections - genetics Nematode Infections - immunology Nematodes Nucleotide sequence Oxidative stress Pathogens Physiological aspects Picea Pine trees Pinus Pinus - genetics Pinus pinaster Pinus pinea Plant Diseases - immunology Plant Diseases - parasitology Polymerase chain reaction Ricin SNAP receptors Species Specificity Stems Trees Tylenchida Water deficit Wilt |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Li9RAEG5kQfAivp11lVYE8dBM-pF0AnvZFZdV0IO6sAeh6fRjZmHIDDsJ6L_fqjyGaXxdvAwhXU16qqrrkVR_Rchra6usqGxgvAyWqUpaZuGXKXBVVVA8c_2ri0-fi_ML9fEyv9xr9YU1YQM88MC4eV5qH_AAKcQhqoaLMnotfShUzIIYcD7B503J1Pj9APxe3p8r0pwJyAimD5RlMd_dY1yyHDFfk5Puq8RB9Tj-v1rrPXeVllLu-aaze-TuGFTSk-HP3Ce3QvOA3B7aTP58SL4PNcXgpCiEqBQSbAwaQdp0gZaOtmt62l1v7WaJPsgtuy39AXn8Znm1gkusjF9QhDWmY1OfTddSsDaQAcPII3Jx9v7bu3M2dlVgtdZlyzwkxNJbh8wonY9O6KiUz-pgg3KCS5vbIotZUQtItIWoeKxdzCrrvPNYjfqYHDTrJjwltIpOKmkhwrJR8Qh00pcOTFaubO14NiPHCWvNZkDQMIhpnY7A9jIoGYOSMVwakMyMzCdJGDcilmPjjJXpM5ey-M2Mt7sZ07P-THuKwk3W1N8A7TOj9pl_ad-MvELVMIik0WCpzsJ226358PWLOckhQEBsI3jSm5EormH9zo4nH4CJCL6VUB4llLDVXTo8aaAZTc3WcFFg7xSwszPycjeMM7F8rgnrDmk0CCpXQv-NpoTgUVYKaJ4MSr3jDSQBEjwqLEAn6p4wLx1prpY9WDk-FcLsw__B7WfkDsSroj8Kqo_IQXvdhecQE7b1i3773wCZ61w6 priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3di9QwEA96Ivgift_qKVEE8SFs06RfIMideJyCPqgH-yCENB-7B0u7breg_70zbbpeUO9lKZsJDZlk5jfp5DeEvNS6SvJKO8ZLp5mshGYafpkEV1U5yRMzHF18-pyfncuPi2wRDty6kFY52cTBUNvW4Bn5nKc5loiA5fR284Nh1Sj8uhpKaFwnN5C6DFO6isU-4OLg_bLp02SZzzkYYpZCfMC4YBmyvUZ33NeRaxoY_P-205ccVZxEeckrnd4htwOcpMej_u-Sa665R26OBSZ_3Sffx2xicE8UwCmF0BrhIuiZLtHG0V1LT_ptpzcr9D5m1Xf0J0Twm9XFGh4xJ35JkdCYhnI-m35Hwc5A7AstD8j56ftv785YqKfA6qIod8xCKCysNjgZpbHepIWX0ia1006alAud6TzxSV6nEGKnacV9bXxSaWONxTzUh-SgaRt3SGjljZBCA7bSXnIPcsKWBoxVJnVteDIjb6KpVZuRO0Mhm3XcAkpWqBmFmlFcKNDMjMwnTSgTuMqxZMZaDTFLmf-jx-t9j-ld_5c9QeVGYxr-aLdLFTasysrCOry4DPhX1vBQelsI63LpE5cmYkZe4NJQyKHRYJLOUvddpz58_aKOM4AGyGoEb3oVhHwL4zc63HmASUTarUjyKJKETW7i5mkFqmBkOvVnS8zI830z9sTEuca1PcoUoKhMpsVVMiXARlFJkHk0Lur93AD8F-BLYQBFtNyjyYtbmovVQFOObwWA_fjqoT8htwCDpsP1zuKIHOy2vXsKOG9XPxs2828331MD priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjR1da9RAcNGK4Iv43dMqqwjiQ2z2I9kEFGnFUoX6oB70QVg2m927wpGclwTaf-9Mkrt29RRfjnA7e7vM91zmg5CXxuRxmhsXscyZSObCRAY-IwmmKneSxbb_6-LkS3o8lZ9Pk9PL8ugRgc3W0A7nSU1XizfnPy_eg8C_6wU-S_cZKNiIg98fMREleX6d3AC7pFBMT-TlOwWwhUlfazRCr19abvmF36rfF4HR6nv7_6nBr5iwML3yir06ukNuj44mPRg44y655qp75OYwevLiPvkx5BmD4aLgtlIIutGRBA6gM9R-tK3pYbdqzHKOdsnOu4aeQ2y_nJ8t4BGz5WcUWx3TcdDPsmspaCCIimHlAZkeffz-4TgaJy1EhVJZG5UQJIvSWERGZktvufJSlnHhjJOWM2ESk8Y-TgsOwTfnOfOF9XFubGlLzFB9SHaqunK7hObeCikMeF3GS-YBTpSZBTWWSFNYFk_I2wC1ejl01dDY5zpcAZHTSBmNlNFMaKDMhOyvKaHt2MUch2ksdB_NZOmWHa83O9Zn_R32EIkb3Kn_ol7N9CjKOslU6bCkGTxjWcBD5kslSpdKHzseiwl5gayhsbtGhek7M9M1jf707as-SMBpwH5HcNKrEcjXcH9rxmoIQCI25Aog9wJIEH8bLq85UK-lRzOe4jwV0L0T8nyzjDsxpa5ydYcwCgiVSK7-BZOBQylyCTCPBqbe4AYCAwFWFi6gAnYPkBeuVGfzvoE5ngqu9-P_QdQTcgt8VN6Xf6o9stOuOvcU_MC2eNaL9y9K1lla priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
| Title | Searching for resistance genes to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus using high throughput screening |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23134679 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1268168793 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1273435427 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1285093947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-599 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3542250 https://doaj.org/article/587de03933104b0398fd73de64f0e203 |
| Volume | 13 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9swEBdry2AvY9_N1gVtDMYeTK0PWzbspRkt3aBldCuEMRCyLCWF4ITahva_353tZFXX7WUvxuROkdCd7n5nnU6EvDMmj9PcuIhlzkQyFyYy8IwkuKrcSRbb7tPFyWl6fC6_TJPp7zI5t3bwWZbuMzCfEQdUHzERJXm-RXa4BD-Ikfnkx2bHADxd0p0kGrjXW5J3_MOts-2LwCV1lfv_tM83HFSYPHnDGx09Ig8HGEkPerk_Jvdc9YTc7y-WvH5KfvZZxOCWKIBSCiE1wkSQL52hbaPNkk7ay9qs5uh17Lyt6RVE7qv5xQJeMRd-RrGQMR2u8Vm1DQX7AjEvUJ6R86PD75-Oo-EehahQKmuiEkJgURqLk5HZ0luuvJRlXDjjpOVMmMSksY_TgkNozXnOfGF9nBtb2hLzT5-T7WpZuV1Cc2-FFAYwlfGSeeATZWbBSCXSFJbFI_IxmFq96mtmaKxiHVJgQWmUjEbJaCY0SGZE9teS0HaoUY5XZSx0F6tk6R0tPmxarPv6O-8EhRuMqfsB1E0PC1UnmSodHlgG3CsLeMl8qUTpUuljx2MxIm9RNTTWzqgwOWdm2rrWn7-d6YMEIAFWM4Ke3g9Mfgnjt2Y46wCTiOW2As69gBMWtw3Jaw3Ug3GpNeMp3pYClnVE3mzI2BIT5iq3bJFHgaASydW_eDKAiyKXwPOiV-rN3ADsF-BDYQAqUPdg8kJKdTHvypNjrwCsX_6fKrwiDwCb8u7Yp9oj281l614D_muKMdlSUzUmO5PD069n4-4rCjxPZDbuTMIvePhaRg |
| linkProvider | BioMedCentral |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR1rb9Mw0BqdEHxBvCkMMAiE-BA1sZ2XBEIrbFrZVqGxSfswyTiO006qktI0gv4pfiN3eZRZwL7tSxTlzrHlu9wjvgchr5SK3SBWxvEioxwRc-UouDoCVFVshOfq-tfF4TjYOxGfT_3TDfKry4XBsMpOJtaCOi00_iMfeCzAFhHATh_m3x3sGoWnq10LjYYt9s3qB7hs5fvRJ6Dva8Z2d44_7jltVwEnCcNo6aTgEPJUaQ8Lxes00yzMhEjdxCgjNPO48lXgZm6QMHA0GYu9LNGZGyud6hSjMeG918im4ODK9MjmcGf85Wh9bgH61u8OQ6Ng4IHodxh4JI7HHR_ry1pZ9TNLGdY9A_7WDBdUox22eUEP7t4mt1oDlm43HHeHbJj8LrnetLRc3SNnTfwyKEQK5jAFZx4NVOAsOkGpSpcFHVaLUs2nqO_0tCrpz9WsmE_PZ3CLUfgTiiWUadtAaF4tKUg28LYBcp-cXMlePyC9vMjNI0LjTHPBFVhzKhNeBng8jTSIR1-oRHtun7yztlbOm2odEutn2xBgK4mUkUgZ6XEJlOmTQUcJqdvq6NikYyZrLykK_jHi7XpEN9f_cYdIXGtN9YNiMZGtiJB-FKYGU6XB4hYJ3ERZGvLUBCJzDXN5n7xE1pBYtSPHsKCJqspSjr4eyW0fjBGsowQzvWmRsgLWr1WbZQGbiIW-LMwtCxPEirbBHQfKVqyV8s9H2Ccv1mAciaF6uSkqxAmBUL5g4WU4ERiqPBaA87Bh6vXegMPBQXvDAkKL3a3NsyH5-bQujI6zgkn_-PKlPyc39o4PD-TBaLz_hNwEC5jVyaXhFuktF5V5ClbmMnnWftqUfLtqafIbnNKTLg |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwELfGEIiXiW86BhiEhHgITWInTiReVqDq-JjQYNI0IVmOP9qKLq2aRoL_nrskrWoYvPBSWb1zHfnOd79r7s6EPFcqD9Nc2SDKrAp4zlSg4DPg4Kpyy6NQN39dfDpOR6f8_VlytkNG61qY4kJjc9KLqa5ebRegzxqrDQP9vb8wrj3sWdqPwLgGMWD-IGJBkudXyFWRJAKP6MngfPM-Afxg0tQZddzrF5aX_MJvle8zz2E1ff3_tN5b7stPrdzyVcObZK8DmfSw1YpbZMeWt8m19trJn3fItzbHGJwWBchKIeBGEAnSp2O0fHQ1p4N6WanFBH2SntQV_QFx_WIyncEQM-XHFNsc0-6Sn0W9omB9ICIGyl1yOnz39c0o6G5ZCAohslVgIEBmRmncjEwbp2PhODdhYZXlOo6YSlQaujAtYgi84ziPXKFdmCtttMHs1Htkt5yX9gGhudOMMwWISzkeOeBjJtNgwhKuCh2FPfLa21q5aDtqSOxx7VNA2hIlI1EyMmISJNMj_bUkpO46mONFGjPZRDJZesmMl5sZ67X-zjtA4XrP1HwxX45ld4xlkgljsZwZUDEvYJA5I5ixKXehjUPWI89QNSR21igxdWes6qqSR19O5GECgAF7HcFKLzomN0eNVl0lBGwiNuPyOA88Tjj62ievNVB2pqeSUZziXSpgd3vk6YaMMzGdrrTzGnkECCrhsfgXTwZgkuUceO63Sr3ZGwgKGHhYeADhqbu3eT6lnE6a5uW4KsDu_f9ThSfk-ue3Q_nx6PjDQ3IDQGzc1IeKA7K7Wtb2EQDFVfG4sQG_AFcJZIg |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Searching+for+resistance+genes+to+Bursaphelenchus+xylophilus+using+high+throughput+screening&rft.jtitle=BMC+genomics&rft.au=Santos%2C+Carla+S&rft.au=Pinheiro%2C+Miguel&rft.au=Silva%2C+Ana+I&rft.au=Egas%2C+Concei%C3%A7%C3%83%C2%A3o&rft.date=2012-11-07&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1471-2164&rft.eissn=1471-2164&rft.volume=13&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1471-2164-13-599&rft.externalDBID=ISR&rft.externalDocID=A534116569 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2164&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2164&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2164&client=summon |