Acceptability of different oral formulations in infants and preschool children

Objective Liquid medicines are easy to swallow. However, they may have disadvantages, such as a bad taste or refrigerated storage conditions. These disadvantages may be avoided by the use of oral solid medicines, such as powders or tablets. The aim of this study was to investigate the acceptability...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of disease in childhood Vol. 98; no. 9; pp. 725 - 731
Main Authors van Riet-Nales, Diana A, de Neef, Barbara J, Schobben, Alfred F A M, Ferreira, José A, Egberts, Toine C G, Rademaker, Catharine M A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health 01.09.2013
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
SeriesOriginal article
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective Liquid medicines are easy to swallow. However, they may have disadvantages, such as a bad taste or refrigerated storage conditions. These disadvantages may be avoided by the use of oral solid medicines, such as powders or tablets. The aim of this study was to investigate the acceptability of and preference among four oral formulations in domiciliary infants and preschool children in The Netherlands. Methods Parents administered four oral placebo dosage forms that were aimed at a neutral taste, at home, to their child (1–4 years of age) twice on one day following a randomised cross-over design: small (4 mm) tablet, powder, suspension and syrup. They were asked to report the child's acceptability by a score on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS score) and by the result of the intake. At the end of the study, they were asked to report the preference of the child and themselves. Results 183 children were included and 148 children were evaluated. The data revealed a period/cross-over effect. The estimate of the mean VAS score was significantly higher for the tablet than for the suspension (tablet 9.39/9.01; powder 8.84/8.20, suspension 8.26/7.90, syrup 8.35/8.19; data day 1/all days). The estimate of the mean number of intakes fully swallowed was significantly higher for the tablet than for the other formulations (all p values <0.05). Children and parents preferred the tablet and syrup over the suspension and the suspension over the powder (all p values <0.05). Conclusions All formulations were well accepted. The tablets were the best accepted formulation; the tablets and syrup the most preferred. Trial Registration number ISRCTN63138435.
Bibliography:local:archdischild;98/9/725
href:archdischild-98-725.pdf
ark:/67375/NVC-JR3GQSJ1-5
istex:8790C5560BA8255BD4DC4D517771B090B43CBB19
PMID:23853004
ArticleID:archdischild-2012-303303
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0003-9888
1468-2044
DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2012-303303