Genotypic characterization and safety assessment of lactic acid bacteria from indigenous African fermented food products
Indigenous fermented food products play an essential role in the diet of millions of Africans. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are among the predominant microbial species in African indigenous fermented food products and are used for different applications in the food and biotechnology industries. Numero...
Saved in:
| Published in | BMC microbiology Vol. 12; no. 1; p. 75 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
17.05.2012
BioMed Central BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Indigenous fermented food products play an essential role in the diet of millions of Africans. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are among the predominant microbial species in African indigenous fermented food products and are used for different applications in the food and biotechnology industries. Numerous studies have described antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of LAB from different parts of the world. However, there is limited information on antimicrobial resistance profiles of LAB from Africa. The aim of this study was to characterize 33 LAB previously isolated from three different African indigenous fermented food products using (GTG)5-based rep-PCR, sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and species-specific PCR techniques for differentiation of closely related species and further evaluate their antibiotic resistance profiles by the broth microdilution method and their haemolytic activity on sheep blood agar plates as indicators of safety traits among these bacteria.
Using molecular biology based methods and selected phenotypic tests such as catalase reaction, CO2 production from glucose, colonies and cells morphology, the isolates were identified as Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus ghanensis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus salivarius, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides, Pediococcus acidilactici, Pediococcus pentosaceus and Weissella confusa. The bacteria were susceptible to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin and erythromycin but resistant to vancomycin, kanamycin and streptomycin. Variable sensitivity profiles to tetracycline and gentamicin was observed among the isolates with Lb. plantarum, Lb. salivarius, W. confusa (except strain SK9-5) and Lb. fermentum strains being susceptible to tetracycline whereas Pediococcus strains and Lb. ghanensis strains were resistant. For gentamicin, Leuc. pseudomesenteroides, Lb. ghanensis and Ped. acidilactici strains were resistant to 64 mg/L whereas some W. confusa and Lb. plantarum strains had a MIC value of 16 mg/L and 32 mg/L respectively. No β-haemolytic activity was observed, however, α-haemolytic activity was observed in 27% (9) of the strains comprising Lb. salivarius (6), W. confusa (2) and Lb. delbrueckii (1) isolates.
The resistance to kanamycin and vancomycin is probably an intrinsic feature since similar observations were reported in the literature for LAB. Low prevalence of pathogenicity indicator traits were observed among the isolates especially with the presence of poor haemolytic activities and they could therefore be considered as interesting candidates for selection of starter cultures or probiotics for different applications. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Doc number: 75 Abstract Background: Indigenous fermented food products play an essential role in the diet of millions of Africans. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are among the predominant microbial species in African indigenous fermented food products and are used for different applications in the food and biotechnology industries. Numerous studies have described antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of LAB from different parts of the world. However, there is limited information on antimicrobial resistance profiles of LAB from Africa. The aim of this study was to characterize 33 LAB previously isolated from three different African indigenous fermented food products using (GTG)5 -based rep-PCR, sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and species-specific PCR techniques for differentiation of closely related species and further evaluate their antibiotic resistance profiles by the broth microdilution method and their haemolytic activity on sheep blood agar plates as indicators of safety traits among these bacteria. Results: Using molecular biology based methods and selected phenotypic tests such as catalase reaction, CO2 production from glucose, colonies and cells morphology, the isolates were identified as Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lactobacillus fermentum , Lactobacillus ghanensis , Lactobacillus plantarum , Lactobacillus salivarius , Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides , Pediococcus acidilactici , Pediococcus pentosaceus and Weissella confusa . The bacteria were susceptible to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin and erythromycin but resistant to vancomycin, kanamycin and streptomycin. Variable sensitivity profiles to tetracycline and gentamicin was observed among the isolates with Lb. plantarum, Lb. salivarius, W. confusa (except strain SK9-5) and Lb. fermentum strains being susceptible to tetracycline whereas Pediococcus strains and Lb. ghanensis strains were resistant. For gentamicin, Leuc. pseudomesenteroides , Lb. ghanensis and Ped. acidilactici strains were resistant to 64 mg/L whereas some W. confusa and Lb. plantarum strains had a MIC value of 16 mg/L and 32 mg/L respectively. No β-haemolytic activity was observed, however, α-haemolytic activity was observed in 27% (9) of the strains comprising Lb. salivarius (6), W. confusa (2) and Lb. delbrueckii (1) isolates. Conclusions: The resistance to kanamycin and vancomycin is probably an intrinsic feature since similar observations were reported in the literature for LAB. Low prevalence of pathogenicity indicator traits were observed among the isolates especially with the presence of poor haemolytic activities and they could therefore be considered as interesting candidates for selection of starter cultures or probiotics for different applications. BACKGROUND: Indigenous fermented food products play an essential role in the diet of millions of Africans. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are among the predominant microbial species in African indigenous fermented food products and are used for different applications in the food and biotechnology industries. Numerous studies have described antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of LAB from different parts of the world. However, there is limited information on antimicrobial resistance profiles of LAB from Africa. The aim of this study was to characterize 33 LAB previously isolated from three different African indigenous fermented food products using (GTG)5-based rep-PCR, sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and species-specific PCR techniques for differentiation of closely related species and further evaluate their antibiotic resistance profiles by the broth microdilution method and their haemolytic activity on sheep blood agar plates as indicators of safety traits among these bacteria. RESULTS: Using molecular biology based methods and selected phenotypic tests such as catalase reaction, CO2 production from glucose, colonies and cells morphology, the isolates were identified as Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus ghanensis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus salivarius, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides, Pediococcus acidilactici, Pediococcus pentosaceus and Weissella confusa. The bacteria were susceptible to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin and erythromycin but resistant to vancomycin, kanamycin and streptomycin. Variable sensitivity profiles to tetracycline and gentamicin was observed among the isolates with Lb. plantarum, Lb. salivarius, W. confusa (except strain SK9-5) and Lb. fermentum strains being susceptible to tetracycline whereas Pediococcus strains and Lb. ghanensis strains were resistant. For gentamicin, Leuc. pseudomesenteroides, Lb. ghanensis and Ped. acidilactici strains were resistant to 64 mg/L whereas some W. confusa and Lb. plantarum strains had a MIC value of 16 mg/L and 32 mg/L respectively. No β-haemolytic activity was observed, however, α-haemolytic activity was observed in 27% (9) of the strains comprising Lb. salivarius (6), W. confusa (2) and Lb. delbrueckii (1) isolates. CONCLUSIONS: The resistance to kanamycin and vancomycin is probably an intrinsic feature since similar observations were reported in the literature for LAB. Low prevalence of pathogenicity indicator traits were observed among the isolates especially with the presence of poor haemolytic activities and they could therefore be considered as interesting candidates for selection of starter cultures or probiotics for different applications. Indigenous fermented food products play an essential role in the diet of millions of Africans. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are among the predominant microbial species in African indigenous fermented food products and are used for different applications in the food and biotechnology industries. Numerous studies have described antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of LAB from different parts of the world. However, there is limited information on antimicrobial resistance profiles of LAB from Africa. The aim of this study was to characterize 33 LAB previously isolated from three different African indigenous fermented food products using (GTG).sub.5-based rep-PCR, sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and species-specific PCR techniques for differentiation of closely related species and further evaluate their antibiotic resistance profiles by the broth microdilution method and their haemolytic activity on sheep blood agar plates as indicators of safety traits among these bacteria. Using molecular biology based methods and selected phenotypic tests such as catalase reaction, CO.sub.2 production from glucose, colonies and cells morphology, the isolates were identified as Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus ghanensis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus salivarius, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides, Pediococcus acidilactici, Pediococcus pentosaceus and Weissella confusa. The bacteria were susceptible to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin and erythromycin but resistant to vancomycin, kanamycin and streptomycin. Variable sensitivity profiles to tetracycline and gentamicin was observed among the isolates with Lb. plantarum, Lb. salivarius, W. confusa (except strain SK9-5) and Lb. fermentum strains being susceptible to tetracycline whereas Pediococcus strains and Lb. ghanensis strains were resistant. For gentamicin, Leuc. pseudomesenteroides, Lb. ghanensis and Ped. acidilactici strains were resistant to 64 mg/L whereas some W. confusa and Lb. plantarum strains had a MIC value of 16 mg/L and 32 mg/L respectively. No [beta]-haemolytic activity was observed, however, [alpha]-haemolytic activity was observed in 27% (9) of the strains comprising Lb. salivarius (6), W. confusa (2) and Lb. delbrueckii (1) isolates. The resistance to kanamycin and vancomycin is probably an intrinsic feature since similar observations were reported in the literature for LAB. Low prevalence of pathogenicity indicator traits were observed among the isolates especially with the presence of poor haemolytic activities and they could therefore be considered as interesting candidates for selection of starter cultures or probiotics for different applications. Background: Indigenous fermented food products play an essential role in the diet of millions of Africans. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are among the predominant microbial species in African indigenous fermented food products and are used for different applications in the food and biotechnology industries. Numerous studies have described antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of LAB from different parts of the world. However, there is limited information on antimicrobial resistance profiles of LAB from Africa. The aim of this study was to characterize 33 LAB previously isolated from three different African indigenous fermented food products using (GTG) sub(5)-based rep-PCR, sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and species-specific PCR techniques for differentiation of closely related species and further evaluate their antibiotic resistance profiles by the broth microdilution method and their haemolytic activity on sheep blood agar plates as indicators of safety traits among these bacteria. Results: Using molecular biology based methods and selected phenotypic tests such as catalase reaction, CO sub(2) production from glucose, colonies and cells morphology, the isolates were identified as Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus ghanensis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus salivarius, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides, Pediococcus acidilactici, Pediococcus pentosaceus and Weissella confusa. The bacteria were susceptible to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin and erythromycin but resistant to vancomycin, kanamycin and streptomycin. Variable sensitivity profiles to tetracycline and gentamicin was observed among the isolates with Lb. plantarum, Lb. salivarius, W. confusa (except strain SK9-5) and Lb. fermentum strains being susceptible to tetracycline whereas Pediococcus strains and Lb. ghanensis strains were resistant. For gentamicin, Leuc. pseudomesenteroides, Lb. ghanensis and Ped. acidilactici strains were resistant to 64 mg/L whereas some W. confusa and Lb. plantarum strains had a MIC value of 16 mg/L and 32 mg/L respectively. No [beta]-haemolytic activity was observed, however, [alpha]-haemolytic activity was observed in 27% (9) of the strains comprising Lb. salivarius (6), W. confusa (2) and Lb. delbrueckii (1) isolates. Conclusions: The resistance to kanamycin and vancomycin is probably an intrinsic feature since similar observations were reported in the literature for LAB. Low prevalence of pathogenicity indicator traits were observed among the isolates especially with the presence of poor haemolytic activities and they could therefore be considered as interesting candidates for selection of starter cultures or probiotics for different applications. Abstract Background Indigenous fermented food products play an essential role in the diet of millions of Africans. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are among the predominant microbial species in African indigenous fermented food products and are used for different applications in the food and biotechnology industries. Numerous studies have described antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of LAB from different parts of the world. However, there is limited information on antimicrobial resistance profiles of LAB from Africa. The aim of this study was to characterize 33 LAB previously isolated from three different African indigenous fermented food products using (GTG)5-based rep-PCR, sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and species-specific PCR techniques for differentiation of closely related species and further evaluate their antibiotic resistance profiles by the broth microdilution method and their haemolytic activity on sheep blood agar plates as indicators of safety traits among these bacteria. Results Using molecular biology based methods and selected phenotypic tests such as catalase reaction, CO2 production from glucose, colonies and cells morphology, the isolates were identified as Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus ghanensis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus salivarius, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides, Pediococcus acidilactici, Pediococcus pentosaceus and Weissella confusa. The bacteria were susceptible to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin and erythromycin but resistant to vancomycin, kanamycin and streptomycin. Variable sensitivity profiles to tetracycline and gentamicin was observed among the isolates with Lb. plantarum, Lb. salivarius, W. confusa (except strain SK9-5) and Lb. fermentum strains being susceptible to tetracycline whereas Pediococcus strains and Lb. ghanensis strains were resistant. For gentamicin, Leuc. pseudomesenteroides, Lb. ghanensis and Ped. acidilactici strains were resistant to 64 mg/L whereas some W. confusa and Lb. plantarum strains had a MIC value of 16 mg/L and 32 mg/L respectively. No β-haemolytic activity was observed, however, α-haemolytic activity was observed in 27% (9) of the strains comprising Lb. salivarius (6), W. confusa (2) and Lb. delbrueckii (1) isolates. Conclusions The resistance to kanamycin and vancomycin is probably an intrinsic feature since similar observations were reported in the literature for LAB. Low prevalence of pathogenicity indicator traits were observed among the isolates especially with the presence of poor haemolytic activities and they could therefore be considered as interesting candidates for selection of starter cultures or probiotics for different applications. Indigenous fermented food products play an essential role in the diet of millions of Africans. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are among the predominant microbial species in African indigenous fermented food products and are used for different applications in the food and biotechnology industries. Numerous studies have described antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of LAB from different parts of the world. However, there is limited information on antimicrobial resistance profiles of LAB from Africa. The aim of this study was to characterize 33 LAB previously isolated from three different African indigenous fermented food products using (GTG)5-based rep-PCR, sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and species-specific PCR techniques for differentiation of closely related species and further evaluate their antibiotic resistance profiles by the broth microdilution method and their haemolytic activity on sheep blood agar plates as indicators of safety traits among these bacteria. Using molecular biology based methods and selected phenotypic tests such as catalase reaction, CO2 production from glucose, colonies and cells morphology, the isolates were identified as Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus ghanensis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus salivarius, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides, Pediococcus acidilactici, Pediococcus pentosaceus and Weissella confusa. The bacteria were susceptible to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin and erythromycin but resistant to vancomycin, kanamycin and streptomycin. Variable sensitivity profiles to tetracycline and gentamicin was observed among the isolates with Lb. plantarum, Lb. salivarius, W. confusa (except strain SK9-5) and Lb. fermentum strains being susceptible to tetracycline whereas Pediococcus strains and Lb. ghanensis strains were resistant. For gentamicin, Leuc. pseudomesenteroides, Lb. ghanensis and Ped. acidilactici strains were resistant to 64 mg/L whereas some W. confusa and Lb. plantarum strains had a MIC value of 16 mg/L and 32 mg/L respectively. No β-haemolytic activity was observed, however, α-haemolytic activity was observed in 27% (9) of the strains comprising Lb. salivarius (6), W. confusa (2) and Lb. delbrueckii (1) isolates. The resistance to kanamycin and vancomycin is probably an intrinsic feature since similar observations were reported in the literature for LAB. Low prevalence of pathogenicity indicator traits were observed among the isolates especially with the presence of poor haemolytic activities and they could therefore be considered as interesting candidates for selection of starter cultures or probiotics for different applications. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Adimpong, David B Nielsen, Dennis S Jespersen, Lene Derkx, Patrick M F Sørensen, Kim I |
| AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Life Sciences, Rolighedsvej 30, DK-1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark 2 Chr-Hansen A/S, 10–12 Bøge Allé, DK-2970, Hørsholm, Denmark |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Department of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Life Sciences, Rolighedsvej 30, DK-1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark – name: 2 Chr-Hansen A/S, 10–12 Bøge Allé, DK-2970, Hørsholm, Denmark |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: David B surname: Adimpong fullname: Adimpong, David B email: dadimpong@life.ku.dk organization: Department of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Life Sciences, Rolighedsvej 30, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. dadimpong@life.ku.dk – sequence: 2 givenname: Dennis S surname: Nielsen fullname: Nielsen, Dennis S – sequence: 3 givenname: Kim I surname: Sørensen fullname: Sørensen, Kim I – sequence: 4 givenname: Patrick M F surname: Derkx fullname: Derkx, Patrick M F – sequence: 5 givenname: Lene surname: Jespersen fullname: Jespersen, Lene |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22594449$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp1kstv1DAQxiNURB9w5oYscYFDWr_iOBekpYKyUiUkHmfLz61Xib3YSdXlr8fLlqVBRT7YGn_zs-ebOa2OQgy2ql4ieI4QZxeItqjGiMMa4bptnlQnh8jRg_NxdZrzGkLUctI-q44xbjpKaXdS3V3ZEMftxmugb2SSerTJ_5SjjwHIYECWzo5bIHO2OQ82jCA60BdZSZDaG6D2KRK4FAfgg_GrQpwyWLjktQzA2bTLswa4GA3YpGgmPebn1VMn-2xf3O9n1fePH75dfqqvP18tLxfXtWIcjjXGjhKMiSYdY7LlsGlhKyGRjlDkWmao0rA1EBrbcaYayLViWPGOWu4s1eSsWu65Jsq12CQ_yLQVUXrxOxDTSshUqumtUJrZlijIOFVUWqecNeXNpvyhY5LZwnq3Z20mNVijS1lJ9jPo_Cb4G7GKt4JQRijlBfB-D1A-_gcwv9FxELsuil0XBcKibQrkzf0vUvwx2TyKwWdt-14GW4wXiGDeINR1rEhf_yNdxymF4rdAkKOuOIvIX9VKFhd8cLG8rXdQsWiKzZhi2hXV-SOqsowdvC5j6XyJzxLezhKKZrR340pOOYvl1y9z7cVeq1PMOVl38ASVssukP-LCq4e9OOj_jDb5BRl3-vs |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s11694_017_9471_z crossref_primary_10_1088_1757_899X_1011_1_012004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fm_2017_03_010 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods12091814 crossref_primary_10_1099_ijs_0_052985_0 crossref_primary_10_3389_frabi_2023_1162636 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_micpath_2018_04_031 crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12469 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12866_024_03317_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12602_020_09674_3 crossref_primary_10_2174_1874285801408010078 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms7080254 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodres_2021_110475 crossref_primary_10_1111_jfpp_15869 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12866_015_0602_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lwt_2015_07_031 crossref_primary_10_1186_1475_2859_13_S1_S5 crossref_primary_10_3389_frfst_2022_892319 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408398_2022_2087174 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43393_021_00044_w crossref_primary_10_3390_vetsci10020129 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijgfs_2023_100670 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11274_021_03013_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yrtph_2018_03_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fct_2021_112277 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijfoodmicro_2014_09_030 crossref_primary_10_5454_mi_8_2_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2020_104036 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12602_015_9195_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13213_018_1386_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lwt_2015_10_045 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2020_735470 crossref_primary_10_1088_1757_899X_774_1_012141 crossref_primary_10_1080_19476337_2014_934297 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodcont_2021_108227 crossref_primary_10_3390_metabo13070849 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12866_023_02883_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods8100485 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodres_2021_110327 crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0307_12418 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00284_023_03580_x crossref_primary_10_1111_1750_3841_14147 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mtsust_2022_100133 crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics12050843 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_micres_2020_126489 crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_208974 crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics12020274 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms10040726 crossref_primary_10_2174_1874070701711010094 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms11030715 crossref_primary_10_2217_fmb_2021_0053 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0145203 crossref_primary_10_14202_vetworld_2021_1133_1142 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12602_014_9163_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodres_2022_112322 crossref_primary_10_1088_1757_899X_1020_1_012026 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.030 10.1016/0168-1605(96)00967-1 10.1007/BF03175135 10.1016/S0168-1656(98)00198-9 10.1016/S0956-7135(97)00017-0 10.1016/S0958-6946(01)00042-5 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2004.02162.x 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00254-4 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.04.019 10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00302-7 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.11.006 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.04.030 10.1007/s00284-004-4431-3 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.12.011 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.09.029 10.3923/jm.2009.214.221 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.09.010 10.1080/10408410902793056 10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00114-4 10.1016/j.fm.2006.11.001 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02895.x 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10921.x 10.1016/S1567-1356(02)00185-X 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.05.003 10.1128/AEM.67.2.504-513.2001 10.1016/0168-1605(95)00067-T 10.1128/AEM.69.2.1270-1275.2003 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.03.008 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.07.009 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.06.007 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00417-7 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.064 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.018 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00162-9 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.01.015 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.02.006 10.1128/AEM.67.8.3450-3454.2001 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2012 BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 Adimpong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copyright ©2012 Adimpong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 Adimpong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2012 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2012 Adimpong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. – notice: Copyright ©2012 Adimpong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 Adimpong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION ISR 3V. 7QL 7T7 7U9 7X7 7XB 88E 8FD 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI C1K CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ H94 HCIFZ K9. LK8 M0S M1P M7N M7P P64 PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7QO 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Virology and AIDS Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biological Sciences Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biological Science Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Biotechnology Research Abstracts PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student Technology Research Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biological Science Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Virology and AIDS Abstracts ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) Biotechnology Research Abstracts |
| DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database Biotechnology Research Abstracts MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Biology |
| EISSN | 1471-2180 |
| EndPage | 75 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_bc6e73b0684b4aefbfed6a7522f96a6e oai_biomedcentral_com_1471_2180_12_75 2777085461 A534124249 10_1186_1471_2180_12_75 22594449 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | Africa Denmark Germany Ghana |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Africa – name: Denmark – name: Germany – name: Ghana |
| GroupedDBID | --- -A0 0R~ 23N 2VQ 2WC 3V. 4.4 53G 5VS 6J9 7X7 88E 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ A8Z AAFWJ AAJSJ ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACPRK ACRMQ ADBBV ADINQ ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AGJBV AHBYD AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C24 C6C CCPQU CGR CS3 CUY CVF DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS ECM EIF EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESTFP ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO IGS IHR INH INR IPNFZ ISR ITC KQ8 LK5 LK8 M1P M48 M7P M7R MM. M~E NPM O5R O5S OK1 P2P PGMZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RIG RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB ~02 AAYXX C1A CITATION AFGXO 7QL 7T7 7U9 7XB 8FD 8FK AZQEC C1K DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ H94 K9. M7N P64 PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7QO ABVAZ AFNRJ 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-b680t-22f43223c3966a7805707a03af341f76d4bc07d00de986b508cb62b894e8fe4c3 |
| IEDL.DBID | RPM |
| ISSN | 1471-2180 |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 04 13:08:08 EDT 2024 Tue Sep 17 21:16:31 EDT 2024 Wed May 22 07:15:20 EDT 2024 Mon Aug 12 07:03:29 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 17:17:42 EDT 2024 Wed Aug 14 18:52:46 EDT 2024 Tue Aug 13 05:22:15 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 21:32:44 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 12 18:01:05 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 07:51:37 EDT 2024 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b680t-22f43223c3966a7805707a03af341f76d4bc07d00de986b508cb62b894e8fe4c3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463448/ |
| PMID | 22594449 |
| PQID | 1081932213 |
| PQPubID | 42585 |
| PageCount | 1 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bc6e73b0684b4aefbfed6a7522f96a6e pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3463448 biomedcentral_primary_oai_biomedcentral_com_1471_2180_12_75 proquest_miscellaneous_1328511996 proquest_journals_1081932213 gale_infotracmisc_A534124249 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A534124249 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A534124249 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2180_12_75 pubmed_primary_22594449 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2012-05-17 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-05-17 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2012 text: 2012-05-17 day: 17 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | BMC microbiology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Microbiol |
| PublicationYear | 2012 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
| References | 10194855 - J Biotechnol. 1999 Feb 19;68(2-3):171-8 17920717 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 Jun 30;125(1):79-90 18063151 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 Jan 31;121(2):217-24 14723700 - J Appl Microbiol. 2004;96(2):384-97 16464696 - Syst Appl Microbiol. 2006 Mar;29(2):145-55 12702452 - FEMS Yeast Res. 2003 Apr;3(2):191-200 16697559 - Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006 Jun;27(6):482-90 11246902 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2001 Feb 15;63(3):189-97 12571056 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Feb;69(2):1270-5 21569940 - Food Microbiol. 2011 Aug;28(5):964-73 16289406 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2005 Dec 15;105(3):281-95 17897178 - J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Oct;103(4):765-77 17418306 - Food Microbiol. 2007 Sep;24(6):559-70 16261866 - Syst Appl Microbiol. 2005 Oct;28(8):755-61 15135588 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 May 15;93(1):115-21 16002169 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2005 Sep 25;104(1):69-82 14698101 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 Jan 15;90(2):197-205 11472918 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Aug;67(8):3450-4 15358510 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 Oct 1;96(1):97-102 17884216 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Nov 30;120(1-2):191-5 11728712 - FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001 Nov 27;205(1):31-6 19514912 - Crit Rev Microbiol. 2009;35(2):139-56 17188771 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Mar 20;114(3):342-51 8579995 - Int J Food Microbiol. 1995 Oct;27(2-3):263-4 17265870 - J Food Prot. 2007 Jan;70(1):119-24 9254694 - Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402 15902467 - Curr Microbiol. 2005 Apr;50(4):202-7 17161485 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Mar 10;114(2):168-86 8880299 - Int J Food Microbiol. 1996 Aug;31(1-3):87-98 16876896 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2006 Oct 1;111(3):234-40 8442626 - Ann Intern Med. 1993 Apr 1;118(7):557-61 16696684 - J Appl Microbiol. 2006 Jun;100(6):1355-63 19493582 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Jul 31;133(1-2):22-30 12423913 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Feb 25;81(1):1-10 21296447 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Feb 28;145(2-3):437-43 11157210 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Feb;67(2):504-13 12505455 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Jan 26;82(1):1-11 15927748 - FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005 Jun 1;247(1):59-63 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B4 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B20 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B3 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B41 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B6 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B44 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B5 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B21 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B43 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B2 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B49 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B24 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B46 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B23 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B45 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B26 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B48 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B25 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B47 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B8 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B7 - 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B11 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B10 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B50 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B17 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B39 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B16 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B38 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B18 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B34 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B15 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B37 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B14 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B36 |
| References_xml | – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B44 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.030 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B16 doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(96)00967-1 – ident: - doi: 10.1007/BF03175135 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B20 doi: 10.1016/S0168-1656(98)00198-9 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/S0956-7135(97)00017-0 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/S0958-6946(01)00042-5 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B14 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2004.02162.x – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B47 doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00254-4 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B15 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.04.019 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B17 doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00302-7 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B7 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.11.006 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B45 doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.04.030 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B48 doi: 10.1007/s00284-004-4431-3 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B46 doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.12.011 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B10 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.09.029 – ident: - doi: 10.3923/jm.2009.214.221 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B8 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.09.010 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B3 doi: 10.1080/10408410902793056 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B6 doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00114-4 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B49 doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2006.11.001 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B11 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02895.x – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B43 doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10921.x – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B2 doi: 10.1016/S1567-1356(02)00185-X – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B18 doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.05.003 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B36 doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.2.504-513.2001 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B21 doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(95)00067-T – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B26 doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.2.1270-1275.2003 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B37 doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B23 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.03.008 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B25 doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.07.009 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B50 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.06.007 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B5 doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00417-7 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B41 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.064 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B34 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.018 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B24 doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00162-9 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B39 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.01.015 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B4 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.02.006 – ident: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-75-B38 doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.8.3450-3454.2001 |
| SSID | ssj0017837 |
| Score | 2.3329823 |
| Snippet | Indigenous fermented food products play an essential role in the diet of millions of Africans. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are among the predominant microbial... Background Indigenous fermented food products play an essential role in the diet of millions of Africans. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are among the predominant... Doc number: 75 Abstract Background: Indigenous fermented food products play an essential role in the diet of millions of Africans. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB)... Background: Indigenous fermented food products play an essential role in the diet of millions of Africans. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are among the predominant... BACKGROUND: Indigenous fermented food products play an essential role in the diet of millions of Africans. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are among the predominant... Abstract Background Indigenous fermented food products play an essential role in the diet of millions of Africans. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are among the... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral biomedcentral proquest gale crossref pubmed |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 75 |
| SubjectTerms | Africa Aminoglycosides Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology Antibacterial agents Antibiotics Bacteria Bacterial Typing Techniques Cluster Analysis DNA, Bacterial - chemistry DNA, Bacterial - genetics DNA, Ribosomal - chemistry DNA, Ribosomal - genetics Drug resistance Drug resistance in microorganisms Drug Resistance, Bacterial Fermentation Fermented foods Food Food Handling Food Microbiology Food Safety Genetic aspects Genetic screening Humans Lactic Acid - metabolism Lactobacillales - classification Lactobacillales - genetics Lactobacillales - isolation & purification Lactobacillales - metabolism Lactobacillus Lactobacillus delbrueckii Lactobacillus fermentum Lactobacillus plantarum Lactobacillus salivarius Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides Microbial Sensitivity Tests Microbiology Molecular Sequence Data Pediococcus Pediococcus acidilactici Pediococcus pentosaceus Phylogeny Physiological aspects RNA RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics Safety and security measures Sequence Analysis, DNA Virulence Factors - genetics Weissella confusa |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Open Access: BioMedCentral Open Access Titles dbid: RBZ link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3La9ZAEF-0Ingpvhutsoqgl2Cyu9lN8NSW1iroQS0UL8s-9YOSfJgU_P57Z5I0dltvXjOzS7LzXDLzG0Je1Up5qyqRgwBsLlgpcqOYzysFhKoRjYnYnPzpszw-ER9Pq9O_YNFX_uCXtXxbgvvMIRCNRQSqukluMcQ4x4v5_vflh4GqR3jMhXlG8fnHBlc628-SgDTi9l_3zpfCU1o6eSkWHd0l23MSSfcmqd8jN0J7n9yexkpuHpDf70PbDZv1ylG34DFP7ZbUtJ72JoZhQ80Cykm7SM_Gbilq3MpTOy0xFJtP6GqBcqXTVKGWRvDnCObpaew6T9cTbGz_kJwcHX47OM7nCQu5lXUx5IxFARbNHYdbj8HxBqpQpuAmQnCLSnphXaF8UfjQ1NJCMuesZLZuRKhjEI4_Iltt14YdQiHqeYPrJVc4xBqiHkQ6abgzPBShyMi75Nj1ekLT0IhvnVLA1DQKTaPQdMm0qjLy5kJIy8Lx-lLL66z7KMRk__EBKJWezVFbJ4PitpC1sMKEaGPwcACQjEZ4Zxky8hJVQCNCRoslOD_Med_rD1-_6L2K48RuUMKMvJ6ZYgcv7szc0QAHgqBaCeduwgkm7FLyhabp2YX0iNyKyTUreUZeLGRciWVxbQCp65IzzJjhnDPyeFLM5bvBUTdC4OYqUdnkYFJKu_o5AoxzITlc25_8l8iekjuQXDKstCjVLtkafp2HZ5DADfb5aLp_AAW-QXU priority: 500 providerName: BioMedCentral – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Ni9UwEA-yIHgR18_qKlEEvZRNmzRp8bSK6yroQV3YW8inPljah68L-_57Z5q-8sIevHjtJKGdmcwHnfkNIa9bpbxVjShBALYUdSVKo2pfNgoITSc6E7E5-es3eXYuvlw0F3ujvrAmLMEDJ8YdWyeD4pbJVlhhQrQxeGkUhA2xk0aGyfpWzS6Zmv8fqHZCy6zA9JbgxNgM6lO18nh5hkUJWF6YNbpfZv5pgvG_aaz3vFVeSbnnmk7vkbtzTElP0rcckluhv09upymT2wfk-lPoh3G7XjnqFnjm1H1JTe_pxsQwbqlZMDrpEOnl1DxFjVt5atMWQ7EXha4WZFeahgz1NIJ5R2xPT-MweLpOKLKbh-T89OPPD2flPHChtLJlYwk8FXDBueOQBBmcdqCYMoybCL4uKumFdUx5xnzoWmkhtnNW1rbtRGhjEI4_Igf90IcnhIIT9Ab3S65wpjU4QXB80nBneGCBFeRdxna9TuAaGuGucwrcPI1C0yg0XdVaNQV5uxPSsnHKZlp5c-l7FGJ2_vQAlEzPSqb_pWQFeYUqoBEwo8eKnF_marPRn3981ycNxwHekMUW5M28KA7w4s7MDQ7AEMTYylYeZSvhRrucvNM0PVuUDQK5YqxdV7wgLxcy7sQquT6A1HXFawyggc8FeZwUc_lusNudEHi4ylQ2Y0xO6Ve_J7xxLiSHLP7p_-DkM3IHQs4a6y8qdUQOxj9X4TmEdaN9Md3gv8ffStw priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9RAEF-0RfBF_G60yiqCvgST7GY3hw_SSmsVLFIt9G3Zz3pQkrNJwfvvnUn2YpeCr7e7uc3M7HxkZ35DyJtGSmdkzXNggMl5VfJcy8rltYSBesEXOmBx8rdjcXTKv57VZ_GDWx_TKjc6cVTUrrP4jRxOd4O-RlWyj6vfOXaNwtvV2ELjNtmGf8Fr2u39g-PvJ_M9goT4KwL6lI14X4IqzsGojQkJmFqYFLlfJLZphPC_qaivWao0i_KaWTq8T-5Ff5LuTQLwgNzy7UNyZ-owuX5E_nz2bTesV0tL7QzNPFVeUt062uvghzXVMz4n7QK9GAunqLZLR820RFOsQ6HLGdWVTg2GWhpAtSOup6Oh6xxdTQiy_WNyenjw89NRHpst5EY0xZBXVeBAXmYZBEAaOx3IQuqC6QB2LkjhuLGFdEXh_KIRBvw6a0RlmgX3TfDcsidkq-1av0MoGECncb1gEvtZgwEEoyc0s5r5whcZ-ZCQXa0mYA2FUNfpCEiAQqYpZJoqKyXrjLzbMGleOEYyjbg5dR-ZmDx__KG7PFfxZCpjhZfMFKLhhmsfTPAOCAB-aYA9C5-R1ygCCsEyWszGOddXfa--_DhRezXD5t0QwWbkbZwUOti41bG4AQiC-FrJzN1kJpxmmw5vJE1FbdKrf7KfkVfzMK7EDLnWA9dVySp0noHOGXk6Ceb83qCzF5zjw2Uisglh0pF2-WvEGmdcMIjgn_1_W8_JXXAkK8yqKOUu2Rour_wLcNYG8zKeyL8ANEAs priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Scholars Portal Open Access Journals dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9RAEF-0Ivgifpu2yiqCvkST7GY3h4hUsVahPqgHfVv2sx4cyXlJofffO5Pk0i7tk6-ZnSOZj50ZbuY3hLyqpHRGljwFBZiUFzlPtSxcWkoglDM-0wGHk49_iKM5_35SnlysAxoF2F5b2uE-qfl6-fb87-YjOPyH3uEr8S6HCzaFUNW3GcjyJrlVcMbR3I_5xV8KEkqxEdvnGiYEBYZKgHME1YxG35dRxOqB_a9e35fiV9xbeSlYHd4jd8cskx4MZnGf3PD1A3J72Du5eUjOv_q66TarhaV2Amwe5jGprh1tdfDdhuoJtZM2gS77cSqq7cJRM7BoitMpdDFhvdJh7VBNA1z4iPbpaGgaR1cDrmz7iMwPv_z-fJSOKxhSI6qsS4sicHB5ZhmURRr3H8hM6ozpANEvSOG4sZl0Web8rBIGsj1rRGGqGfdV8Nyyx2Snbmr_lFAIi04jv2ASt1xDWIRQKDSzmvnMZwl5H4ldrQa4DYUA2DEFfFGh_hTqT-WFkmVC3myVNDH29U0lrh79hEqMfr9_0KxP1eivyljhJTOZqLjh2gcTvAMBQLYa4J2FT8hLNAGFEBo19uic6rO2Vd9-_VQHJcOV3lDXJuT1eCg08OJWjyMPIBBE3YpO7kcnwcdtTN5amtq6CEK7YvZd5CwhLyYycmLfXO1B6ypnBabUIOeEPBkMc_rurb0nREYmGwkmptSLPz0COXgXg7p-978598gdyDwLbMPI5T7Z6dZn_hlkd5153nvtPyU5TpA priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
| Title | Genotypic characterization and safety assessment of lactic acid bacteria from indigenous African fermented food products |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22594449 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1081932213 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1328511996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-75 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3463448 https://doaj.org/article/bc6e73b0684b4aefbfed6a7522f96a6e |
| Volume | 12 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swEBdtx2AvY9_11gVtDLYXN7YlSw57akq7bpBSshXKXoQkS10gtUOTwvLf785fVPRtL36IdEG5D92dc_c7Qj4VUpZG5jwGAZiYZymPtczKOJewkE_4RHtsTp6di7NL_uMqv9ohed8L0xTtW7M4rJY3h9XiT1Nbubqx475ObHwxO2ZcMEgrxrtkVzLWp-jdXwcSUq4OwyctxDiF2zcGP9bUIEgcVAMaPOEcwTODFvdl4JkaAP-H1_Q9PxXWUN5zSqfPyNMumqRH7amfkx1XvSCP2_mS25fk7zdX1ZvtamGpHYCZ275LqquSrrV3my3VAzonrT1dNm1TVNtFSU1Loil2odDFgOlK2_FCFfVwsSOqZ0l9XZd01eLHrl-Ry9OTX8dncTdqITaiSDZxlnkOps0sg_RH45wDmUidMO3By3kpSm5sIsskKd2kEAaiOmtEZooJd4V33LLXZK-qK7dPKLi_UiO9YBKnWYP7A5cnNLOaucQlEfkasF2tWlgNhUDX4QrYnEL5KZSfSjMl84h86YU0EDZ5TCEebp2iEIPvbz6ob69Vp07KWOEkM4kouOHaeeNdCQyAqNTDmYWLyEdUAYVQGRXW4lzru_Vaff85V0c5w9HdkL9G5HO3yddwcKu71gZgCKJrBTsPgp1gyzZc7jVNdXfJGiFcMcrOUhaRD8MyUmJ9XOVA6iplGYbOwOeIvGkVc_jdvb5HRAYqGzAmXAHDa5DGO0N7-9-U78gTiDAzLLdI5QHZ29zeufcQxW3MCGz3So7Io-nJ-cV81LwLgeeMF_CcT3-PGqv-BxWhTT8 |
| link.rule.ids | 108,230,315,733,786,790,870,891,2115,2236,12083,21416,24346,24965,27955,27956,31752,31753,33777,33778,43343,43838,53825,53827,76167,76168 |
| linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagCNEL4k2ggEFIcIlIYsfOigMqiLKFtgdopb1ZfpaVqmTbpBL775lJsqFWJa47duSdGc8jmfmGkLeVlM7IkqcgAJPyIueploVLSwmEcsZnOmBz8uGRmJ_w74tyMb5wa8eyyo1N7A21ayy-I4fbXWGsUeTs0-o8xalR-HV1HKFxk9zijHHUc7mYEq5cQvY1wvnklfiQgyFOwaX15QhYWBi1uJ9FnqkH8L9upq_4qbiG8opT2rtH7o7RJN0dxH-f3PD1A3J7mC-5fkj-fPN1061XS0vtBMw89F1SXTva6uC7NdUTOidtAj3r26aotktHzbBFU-xCocsJ05UO44VqGsCwI6qno6FpHF0N-LHtI3Ky9_X4yzwdRy2kRlRZlxZF4MBcZhmkPxrnHMhM6ozpAF4uSOG4sZl0Web8rBIGojprRGGqGfdV8Nyyx2Srbmr_lFBwf07jfsEkTrMG9wcuT2hmNfOZzxLyMWK7Wg2wGgqBrmMKyF-h0BQKTeWFkmVC3m-ENG3s85hKXF_6GYUYPb__obk4VeO9VMYKL5nJRMUN1z6Y4B0wAKLSAGcWPiFvUAUUQmXUWItzqi_bVu3_-ql2S4ajuyF_Tci7cVFo4OBWj60NwBBE14pW7kQr4S7bmLzRNDXaklb90_yEvJ7IuBPr42oPUlc5KzB0Bj4n5MmgmNP_Bos94xwfLiOVjRgTU-rl7x5pnHHBIH9_9v9jvSJ35seHB-pg_-jHc7INIWWB9RW53CFb3cWlfwFhW2de9nfzL9bJQbM |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELagCMSF9yNQwCAkuGQ3iR07K06lsLRAqwqoVHGx_Cwrtsmqm5VYfj3jvLSmt14zM1Fsj-ehzHyD0OuCc6N4TmM4ABXTLKWx5JmJcw6EfEIn0vnm5INDtndMP5_kJxujvpqifa1mo3J-Nipnv5raysWZHvd1YuOjg11CGYG0YrwwbnwVXYM7m_E-Ue9-IHBIvDokn7Rg4xRscAzerKlE4H5cDejxhFIPoRk0us8D_9TA-F801hveKqyk3HBN09voZ7-otiLl92hVq5H--x_e46VWfQfd6gJWvNOy3EVXbHkPXW9HWK7voz-fbFnV68VMYz1gP7etnViWBi-ls_UaywEAFFcOz5vOLCz1zGDVikjsG13wbICNxe0EoxI78B0eONRgV1UGL1qI2uUDdDz9-GN3L-6mOcSKFUkdZ5mjYD2IJpBhST9KgSdcJkQ6cKSOM0OVTrhJEmMnBVMQOGrFMlVMqC2cpZo8RFtlVdrHCIOHNdLLM8L9wGzwsOBVmSRaEpvYJELvgjMVixa5Q3gs7ZAC11p45RBeOUSaCZ5H6G2vAYNgkyoV7CLre68hwfubB9X5qejOTijNLCcqYQVVVFqnnDWwARD4OvhmZiP0yuuX8GgcpS_3OZWr5VLsf_8mdnLip4NDihyhNx2Tq-DDtey6J2BDPIBXwLkdcIK50CG5V2PRmaulR4n1gXyWkgi9HMhe0pfglRZOXaQk89E57HOEHrVaP6y7v0wR4sF9CDYmpICWN2DmnVY_ubTkC3Tj6MNUfN0__PIU3YR4NvPFHSnfRlv1-co-g5ixVs8b6_APMkVsVg |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genotypic+characterization+and+safety+assessment+of+lactic+acid+bacteria+from+indigenous+African+fermented+food+products&rft.jtitle=BMC+microbiology&rft.au=Adimpong%2C+David+B&rft.au=Nielsen%2C+Dennis+S&rft.au=S%C3%B8rensen%2C+Kim+I&rft.au=Derkx%2C+Patrick+MF&rft.date=2012-05-17&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2180&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=75&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1471-2180-12-75&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F22594449&rft.externalDBID=PMC3463448 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon |