An objective assessment method for frequency selectivity of the human auditory system

• Published in: Biomedical engineering online Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 171
• Main Authors: Gong, Qin, Wang, Yao, Xian, Meng
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 18.12.2014; BioMed Central Ltd
• Subjects: Acoustics; Adult; Analysis; Biomaterials; Biomedical engineering; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering; Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology; Biotechnology; Calibration; Cochlea - physiology; Computer software industry; Ears & hearing; Emissions; Engineering; Experiments; Female; Fourier Analysis; Hearing - physiology; Humans; Male; Methods; Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous - physiology; Psychophysics; Signal processing; Sound; Studies; Young Adult; United States; Psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs); Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves (SFOAE STCs); Frequency selectivity (FS) assessment
• ISSN: 1475-925X; 1475-925X
• DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-171

Background Frequency selectivity (FS) is an important aspect of auditory function, and is typically described by a tuning curve function. Sharply tuned curves represent a higher acuity in detecting frequency differences, and conversely, broadly tuned curves demonstrate a lower acuity. One way of obtaining tuning curves is from techniques based on subjective behavioral responses, which yields psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs). In contrast, other methods rely on objective auditory responses to sound, such as neuron responses and otoacoustic emissions, amongst others. The present study introduces an objective method that uses stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) to assemble suppression tuning curves (STCs). Finding an objective method of accurately measuring human FS is very important, as it would permit the FS to be assayed in non-responsive patients (e.g., neonates or comatose patients). However, before the objective method can be applied, it must be demonstrated that its ability to estimate the FS, gives comparable results to those obtained by subjective procedures i.e. PTCs. Methods SFOAEs responses, generated in the peripheral auditory system, were used to produce STCs. PTCs were measured by behavioral responses. The validity of the objective measures of human FS were determined by comparing stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves (SFOAE STCs) to PTCs at common stimulus parameters in 10 individuals with normal hearing, at low probe-tone levels. Results The average Q 10 ratios measured between PTCs and SFOAE STCs from subjects were close to 1 at various center frequencies ( F 2,24  = .15, p  = .858). The estimates of FS provided by SFOAE STCs and PTCs were similar. Conclusions This system could be used to estimate auditory FS by both objective and subjective methods. SFOAE STCs have the potential to provide an objective estimate of auditory FS.