Locomotor adaptation to a powered ankle-foot orthosis depends on control method

• Published in: Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation Vol. 4; no. 1; p. 48
• Main Authors: Cain, Stephen M, Gordon, Keith E, Ferris, Daniel P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 21.12.2007; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adaptation, Physiological - physiology; Adult; Ankle - physiology; Biomechanical Phenomena; Control Groups; Electromyography; Electromyography - methods; Exercise Test - methods; Female; Foot; Health aspects; Humans; Linear Models; Locomotion - physiology; Male; Medical equipment; Methods; Movements; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Orthotic Devices; Physiological apparatus; Physiological aspects; Posture; Time Factors; United States
• ISSN: 1743-0003; 1743-0003
• DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-4-48

We studied human locomotor adaptation to powered ankle-foot orthoses with the intent of identifying differences between two different orthosis control methods. The first orthosis control method used a footswitch to provide bang-bang control (a kinematic control) and the second orthosis control method used a proportional myoelectric signal from the soleus (a physiological control). Both controllers activated an artificial pneumatic muscle providing plantar flexion torque. Subjects walked on a treadmill for two thirty-minute sessions spaced three days apart under either footswitch control (n = 6) or myoelectric control (n = 6). We recorded lower limb electromyography (EMG), joint kinematics, and orthosis kinetics. We compared stance phase EMG amplitudes, correlation of joint angle patterns, and mechanical work performed by the powered orthosis between the two controllers over time. During steady state at the end of the second session, subjects using proportional myoelectric control had much lower soleus and gastrocnemius activation than the subjects using footswitch control. The substantial decrease in triceps surae recruitment allowed the proportional myoelectric control subjects to walk with ankle kinematics close to normal and reduce negative work performed by the orthosis. The footswitch control subjects walked with substantially perturbed ankle kinematics and performed more negative work with the orthosis. These results provide evidence that the choice of orthosis control method can greatly alter how humans adapt to powered orthosis assistance during walking. Specifically, proportional myoelectric control results in larger reductions in muscle activation and gait kinematics more similar to normal compared to footswitch control.