A mark-resight survey method to estimate the roaming dog population in three cities in Rajasthan, India

Dog population management is required in many locations to minimise the risks dog populations may pose to human health and to alleviate animal welfare problems. In many cities in India, Animal Birth Control (ABC) projects have been adopted to provide population management. Measuring the impact of su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC veterinary research Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 46 - 282
Main Authors Hiby, Lex R, Reece, John F, Wright, Rachel, Jaisinghani, Rajan, Singh, Baldev, Hiby, Elly F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 11.08.2011
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1746-6148
1746-6148
DOI10.1186/1746-6148-7-46

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Dog population management is required in many locations to minimise the risks dog populations may pose to human health and to alleviate animal welfare problems. In many cities in India, Animal Birth Control (ABC) projects have been adopted to provide population management. Measuring the impact of such projects requires assessment of dog population size among other relevant indicators. This paper describes a simple mark-resight survey methodology that can be used with little investment of resources to monitor the number of roaming dogs in areas that are currently subject to ABC, provided the numbers, dates and locations of the dogs released following the intervention are reliably recorded. We illustrate the method by estimating roaming dog numbers in three cities in Rajasthan, India: Jaipur, Jodhpur and Jaisalmer. In each city the dog populations were either currently subject to ABC or had been very recently subject to such an intervention and hence a known number of dogs had been permanently marked with an ear-notch to identify them as having been operated. We conducted street surveys to record the current percentage of dogs in each city that are ear-notched and used an estimate for the annual survival of ear-notched dogs to calculate the current size of each marked population. Dividing the size of the marked population by the fraction of the dogs that are ear-notched we estimated the number of roaming dogs to be 36,580 in Jaipur, 24,853 in Jodhpur and 2,962 in Jaisalmer. The mark-resight survey methodology described here is a simple way of providing population estimates for cities with current or recent ABC programmes that include visible marking of dogs. Repeating such surveys on a regular basis will further allow for evaluation of ABC programme impact on population size and reproduction in the remaining unsterilised dog population.
AbstractList 1. Background Dog population management is required in many locations to minimise the risks dog populations may pose to human health and to alleviate animal welfare problems. In many cities in India, Animal Birth Control (ABC) projects have been adopted to provide population management. Measuring the impact of such projects requires assessment of dog population size among other relevant indicators. Methods This paper describes a simple mark-resight survey methodology that can be used with little investment of resources to monitor the number of roaming dogs in areas that are currently subject to ABC, provided the numbers, dates and locations of the dogs released following the intervention are reliably recorded. We illustrate the method by estimating roaming dog numbers in three cities in Rajasthan, India: Jaipur, Jodhpur and Jaisalmer. In each city the dog populations were either currently subject to ABC or had been very recently subject to such an intervention and hence a known number of dogs had been permanently marked with an ear-notch to identify them as having been operated. We conducted street surveys to record the current percentage of dogs in each city that are ear-notched and used an estimate for the annual survival of ear-notched dogs to calculate the current size of each marked population. Results Dividing the size of the marked population by the fraction of the dogs that are ear-notched we estimated the number of roaming dogs to be 36,580 in Jaipur, 24,853 in Jodhpur and 2,962 in Jaisalmer. Conclusions The mark-resight survey methodology described here is a simple way of providing population estimates for cities with current or recent ABC programmes that include visible marking of dogs. Repeating such surveys on a regular basis will further allow for evaluation of ABC programme impact on population size and reproduction in the remaining unsterilised dog population.
1. ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Dog population management is required in many locations to minimise the risks dog populations may pose to human health and to alleviate animal welfare problems. In many cities in India, Animal Birth Control (ABC) projects have been adopted to provide population management. Measuring the impact of such projects requires assessment of dog population size among other relevant indicators. METHODS: This paper describes a simple mark-resight survey methodology that can be used with little investment of resources to monitor the number of roaming dogs in areas that are currently subject to ABC, provided the numbers, dates and locations of the dogs released following the intervention are reliably recorded. We illustrate the method by estimating roaming dog numbers in three cities in Rajasthan, India: Jaipur, Jodhpur and Jaisalmer. In each city the dog populations were either currently subject to ABC or had been very recently subject to such an intervention and hence a known number of dogs had been permanently marked with an ear-notch to identify them as having been operated. We conducted street surveys to record the current percentage of dogs in each city that are ear-notched and used an estimate for the annual survival of ear-notched dogs to calculate the current size of each marked population. RESULTS: Dividing the size of the marked population by the fraction of the dogs that are ear-notched we estimated the number of roaming dogs to be 36,580 in Jaipur, 24,853 in Jodhpur and 2,962 in Jaisalmer. CONCLUSIONS: The mark-resight survey methodology described here is a simple way of providing population estimates for cities with current or recent ABC programmes that include visible marking of dogs. Repeating such surveys on a regular basis will further allow for evaluation of ABC programme impact on population size and reproduction in the remaining unsterilised dog population.
BACKGROUND: Dog population management is required in many locations to minimise the risks dog populations may pose to human health and to alleviate animal welfare problems. In many cities in India, Animal Birth Control (ABC) projects have been adopted to provide population management. Measuring the impact of such projects requires assessment of dog population size among other relevant indicators. METHODS: This paper describes a simple mark-resight survey methodology that can be used with little investment of resources to monitor the number of roaming dogs in areas that are currently subject to ABC, provided the numbers, dates and locations of the dogs released following the intervention are reliably recorded. We illustrate the method by estimating roaming dog numbers in three cities in Rajasthan, India: Jaipur, Jodhpur and Jaisalmer. In each city the dog populations were either currently subject to ABC or had been very recently subject to such an intervention and hence a known number of dogs had been permanently marked with an ear-notch to identify them as having been operated. We conducted street surveys to record the current percentage of dogs in each city that are ear-notched and used an estimate for the annual survival of ear-notched dogs to calculate the current size of each marked population. RESULTS: Dividing the size of the marked population by the fraction of the dogs that are ear-notched we estimated the number of roaming dogs to be 36,580 in Jaipur, 24,853 in Jodhpur and 2,962 in Jaisalmer. CONCLUSIONS: The mark-resight survey methodology described here is a simple way of providing population estimates for cities with current or recent ABC programmes that include visible marking of dogs. Repeating such surveys on a regular basis will further allow for evaluation of ABC programme impact on population size and reproduction in the remaining unsterilised dog population.
1. Abstract Dog population management is required in many locations to minimise the risks dog populations may pose to human health and to alleviate animal welfare problems. In many cities in India, Animal Birth Control (ABC) projects have been adopted to provide population management. Measuring the impact of such projects requires assessment of dog population size among other relevant indicators. This paper describes a simple mark-resight survey methodology that can be used with little investment of resources to monitor the number of roaming dogs in areas that are currently subject to ABC, provided the numbers, dates and locations of the dogs released following the intervention are reliably recorded. We illustrate the method by estimating roaming dog numbers in three cities in Rajasthan, India: Jaipur, Jodhpur and Jaisalmer. In each city the dog populations were either currently subject to ABC or had been very recently subject to such an intervention and hence a known number of dogs had been permanently marked with an ear-notch to identify them as having been operated. We conducted street surveys to record the current percentage of dogs in each city that are ear-notched and used an estimate for the annual survival of ear-notched dogs to calculate the current size of each marked population. Dividing the size of the marked population by the fraction of the dogs that are ear-notched we estimated the number of roaming dogs to be 36,580 in Jaipur, 24,853 in Jodhpur and 2,962 in Jaisalmer. The mark-resight survey methodology described here is a simple way of providing population estimates for cities with current or recent ABC programmes that include visible marking of dogs. Repeating such surveys on a regular basis will further allow for evaluation of ABC programme impact on population size and reproduction in the remaining unsterilised dog population.
Dog population management is required in many locations to minimise the risks dog populations may pose to human health and to alleviate animal welfare problems. In many cities in India, Animal Birth Control (ABC) projects have been adopted to provide population management. Measuring the impact of such projects requires assessment of dog population size among other relevant indicators.BACKGROUNDDog population management is required in many locations to minimise the risks dog populations may pose to human health and to alleviate animal welfare problems. In many cities in India, Animal Birth Control (ABC) projects have been adopted to provide population management. Measuring the impact of such projects requires assessment of dog population size among other relevant indicators.This paper describes a simple mark-resight survey methodology that can be used with little investment of resources to monitor the number of roaming dogs in areas that are currently subject to ABC, provided the numbers, dates and locations of the dogs released following the intervention are reliably recorded. We illustrate the method by estimating roaming dog numbers in three cities in Rajasthan, India: Jaipur, Jodhpur and Jaisalmer. In each city the dog populations were either currently subject to ABC or had been very recently subject to such an intervention and hence a known number of dogs had been permanently marked with an ear-notch to identify them as having been operated. We conducted street surveys to record the current percentage of dogs in each city that are ear-notched and used an estimate for the annual survival of ear-notched dogs to calculate the current size of each marked population.METHODSThis paper describes a simple mark-resight survey methodology that can be used with little investment of resources to monitor the number of roaming dogs in areas that are currently subject to ABC, provided the numbers, dates and locations of the dogs released following the intervention are reliably recorded. We illustrate the method by estimating roaming dog numbers in three cities in Rajasthan, India: Jaipur, Jodhpur and Jaisalmer. In each city the dog populations were either currently subject to ABC or had been very recently subject to such an intervention and hence a known number of dogs had been permanently marked with an ear-notch to identify them as having been operated. We conducted street surveys to record the current percentage of dogs in each city that are ear-notched and used an estimate for the annual survival of ear-notched dogs to calculate the current size of each marked population.Dividing the size of the marked population by the fraction of the dogs that are ear-notched we estimated the number of roaming dogs to be 36,580 in Jaipur, 24,853 in Jodhpur and 2,962 in Jaisalmer.RESULTSDividing the size of the marked population by the fraction of the dogs that are ear-notched we estimated the number of roaming dogs to be 36,580 in Jaipur, 24,853 in Jodhpur and 2,962 in Jaisalmer.The mark-resight survey methodology described here is a simple way of providing population estimates for cities with current or recent ABC programmes that include visible marking of dogs. Repeating such surveys on a regular basis will further allow for evaluation of ABC programme impact on population size and reproduction in the remaining unsterilised dog population.CONCLUSIONSThe mark-resight survey methodology described here is a simple way of providing population estimates for cities with current or recent ABC programmes that include visible marking of dogs. Repeating such surveys on a regular basis will further allow for evaluation of ABC programme impact on population size and reproduction in the remaining unsterilised dog population.
Dog population management is required in many locations to minimise the risks dog populations may pose to human health and to alleviate animal welfare problems. In many cities in India, Animal Birth Control (ABC) projects have been adopted to provide population management. Measuring the impact of such projects requires assessment of dog population size among other relevant indicators. This paper describes a simple mark-resight survey methodology that can be used with little investment of resources to monitor the number of roaming dogs in areas that are currently subject to ABC, provided the numbers, dates and locations of the dogs released following the intervention are reliably recorded. We illustrate the method by estimating roaming dog numbers in three cities in Rajasthan, India: Jaipur, Jodhpur and Jaisalmer. In each city the dog populations were either currently subject to ABC or had been very recently subject to such an intervention and hence a known number of dogs had been permanently marked with an ear-notch to identify them as having been operated. We conducted street surveys to record the current percentage of dogs in each city that are ear-notched and used an estimate for the annual survival of ear-notched dogs to calculate the current size of each marked population. Dividing the size of the marked population by the fraction of the dogs that are ear-notched we estimated the number of roaming dogs to be 36,580 in Jaipur, 24,853 in Jodhpur and 2,962 in Jaisalmer. The mark-resight survey methodology described here is a simple way of providing population estimates for cities with current or recent ABC programmes that include visible marking of dogs. Repeating such surveys on a regular basis will further allow for evaluation of ABC programme impact on population size and reproduction in the remaining unsterilised dog population.
Audience Academic
Author Hiby, Elly F
Hiby, Lex R
Wright, Rachel
Jaisinghani, Rajan
Reece, John F
Singh, Baldev
AuthorAffiliation 3 Tree of Life for Animals, Kharekhari Village, Nr Foy Sagar, Ajmer 301005, Rajasthan, India
1 Conservation Research Ltd., 110 Hinton Way, Great Shelford, Cambridge CB22 5AL, UK
4 Marwar Animal Protection Trust, Maanpura, Dardyaon ki Dhani, Jhalamand - Khejarli Road, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
5 World Society for Protection of Animals, 222 Grays Inn Road, London, WC1X 8HB, UK
2 Help in Suffering, Maharani Farm, Durgapura, Jaipur 302018, Rajasthan, India
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Conservation Research Ltd., 110 Hinton Way, Great Shelford, Cambridge CB22 5AL, UK
– name: 2 Help in Suffering, Maharani Farm, Durgapura, Jaipur 302018, Rajasthan, India
– name: 3 Tree of Life for Animals, Kharekhari Village, Nr Foy Sagar, Ajmer 301005, Rajasthan, India
– name: 5 World Society for Protection of Animals, 222 Grays Inn Road, London, WC1X 8HB, UK
– name: 4 Marwar Animal Protection Trust, Maanpura, Dardyaon ki Dhani, Jhalamand - Khejarli Road, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Lex R
  surname: Hiby
  fullname: Hiby, Lex R
– sequence: 2
  givenname: John F
  surname: Reece
  fullname: Reece, John F
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Rachel
  surname: Wright
  fullname: Wright, Rachel
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Rajan
  surname: Jaisinghani
  fullname: Jaisinghani, Rajan
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Baldev
  surname: Singh
  fullname: Singh, Baldev
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Elly F
  surname: Hiby
  fullname: Hiby, Elly F
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21834979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFk8tv1DAQhyNURNuFK0dkiQMcyBLHjmNfKq0qHitVQkJwthw_sl4Se7GdSv3vcXbbqgsU5EPsmd98mlfOixPnnS6Kl7BaQkjJe9hiUhKIadmWmDwpzu4NJw_up8V5jNuqwpi15FlxWkOK8pWdFf0KjCL8KIOOtt8kEKdwrW_AqNPGK5A80DHZUSQN0kaD4MVoXQ-U78HO76ZBJOsdsC57g9ZA2mR1nN9fxVbEtBHuHVg7ZcXz4qkRQ9Qvbr-L4vvHD98uP5dXXz6tL1dXZUcwSSVqa9FBJogRyjQdMRobZqqcrDFCMqEYhaLtuqZBsqooI5opjCSW0EBIBEGLYn3gKi-2fBdy7uGGe2H53uBDz0VIVg6at4pJVTW1qZXGjLU0Y6mEjLQMS1Q3mXVxYO2mbtRKapeCGI6gxx5nN7z31xxBgiBlGbA6ADrrHwEce6Qf-Tw0Pg-NtxzPBb25TSL4n1OeBh9tlHoYhNN-ipzShlWozmdRvP2nEsEGEcxQ9X8pxHMJtNnX8Pog7UXumXXG50zlLOermjQYo7xHWbX8iyofpUcr88oam-1HAa8e9va-J3ebmQX4IJDBxxi04Xm59uuWyXbgsOLzD_Bnu5a_hd2RHwn4BcLxBmI
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_tropicalmed8080421
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolmodel_2016_09_018
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_5982
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_applanim_2021_105449
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2021_679429
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pntd_0004824
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani10061061
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani9121020
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_08697_w
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0242937
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actatropica_2014_05_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prevetmed_2013_11_012
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani7080057
crossref_primary_10_3390_vetsci9020075
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11252_022_01320_w
crossref_primary_10_1080_07352166_2020_1779006
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14202939
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_onehlt_2019_100103
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_15049_1
crossref_primary_10_1177_194008291200500408
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12879_015_1320_2
crossref_primary_10_11609_jott_7203_14_5_21025_21031
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_75828_6
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12917_017_1051_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prevetmed_2015_01_008
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0142647
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani12010105
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0225022
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pntd_0003784
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prevetmed_2020_105120
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rvsc_2019_02_009
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12917_019_1938_1
crossref_primary_10_3390_tropicalmed5010047
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0030605319001145
Cites_doi 10.1136/vr.150.14.450
10.1016/S0167-5877(97)00039-1
10.1186/1746-6148-4-6
10.1136/vr.159.12.379
10.1016/S0001-706X(01)00082-1
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2011 BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright ©2011 Hiby et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011 Hiby et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2011 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: Copyright ©2011 Hiby et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011 Hiby et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7S9
L.6
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-7-46
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

AGRICOLA

MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Veterinary Medicine
EISSN 1746-6148
EndPage 282
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_7d9cd052f2de49978bb58c196794c325
PMC3163189
oai_biomedcentral_com_1746_6148_7_46
A265443979
21834979
10_1186_1746_6148_7_46
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations India
United Kingdom
GeographicLocations_xml – name: India
– name: United Kingdom
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2VQ
2WC
2XV
4.4
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
7X7
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAHBH
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
APEBS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C1A
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
EYRJQ
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
H13
HMCUK
HYE
IAG
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
IPNFZ
ITC
ITG
ITH
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RIG
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
XSB
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PMFND
7S9
L.6
7X8
-A0
3V.
ABVAZ
ACRMQ
ADINQ
AFGXO
AFNRJ
C24
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-b646t-372ab19a6fadf5b6fe4f9f0349ffac9ad981a7bb553c00896e9d43c4c1f116a63
IEDL.DBID RBZ
ISSN 1746-6148
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:26:06 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:11:58 EDT 2025
Wed May 22 07:16:47 EDT 2024
Fri Jul 11 16:38:55 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 06:11:45 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 03:15:59 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:46:16 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:25:04 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:02:09 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:51:52 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:33:59 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b646t-372ab19a6fadf5b6fe4f9f0349ffac9ad981a7bb553c00896e9d43c4c1f116a63
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-7-46
PMID 21834979
PQID 1431638589
PQPubID 24069
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7d9cd052f2de49978bb58c196794c325
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3163189
biomedcentral_primary_oai_biomedcentral_com_1746_6148_7_46
proquest_miscellaneous_885903232
proquest_miscellaneous_3153649302
proquest_miscellaneous_1431638589
gale_infotracmisc_A265443979
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A265443979
pubmed_primary_21834979
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_1746_6148_7_46
crossref_primary_10_1186_1746_6148_7_46
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2011-08-11
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2011-08-11
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2011
  text: 2011-08-11
  day: 11
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle BMC veterinary research
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Vet Res
PublicationYear 2011
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References 10.1186/1746-6148-7-46-B7
10.1186/1746-6148-7-46-B12
10.1186/1746-6148-7-46-B6
10.1186/1746-6148-7-46-B11
10.1186/1746-6148-7-46-B3
References_xml – ident: 10.1186/1746-6148-7-46-B12
  doi: 10.1136/vr.150.14.450
– ident: 10.1186/1746-6148-7-46-B7
  doi: 10.1016/S0167-5877(97)00039-1
– ident: 10.1186/1746-6148-7-46-B11
  doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-4-6
– ident: 10.1186/1746-6148-7-46-B3
  doi: 10.1136/vr.159.12.379
– ident: 10.1186/1746-6148-7-46-B6
  doi: 10.1016/S0001-706X(01)00082-1
SSID ssj0044976
Score 2.1042137
Snippet Dog population management is required in many locations to minimise the risks dog populations may pose to human health and to alleviate animal welfare...
1. Background Dog population management is required in many locations to minimise the risks dog populations may pose to human health and to alleviate animal...
1. Abstract Dog population management is required in many locations to minimise the risks dog populations may pose to human health and to alleviate animal...
BACKGROUND: Dog population management is required in many locations to minimise the risks dog populations may pose to human health and to alleviate animal...
1. ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Dog population management is required in many locations to minimise the risks dog populations may pose to human health and to...
1. Abstract Background Dog population management is required in many locations to minimise the risks dog populations may pose to human health and to alleviate...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
biomedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 46
SubjectTerms animal and human health
Animal Identification Systems
Animal Identification Systems - methods
Animal Identification Systems - veterinary
animal welfare
Animals
at-risk population
cities
contraception
Data Collection
Dogs
Dogs - surgery
Ear
Ear - surgery
Female
Health aspects
human health
India
Male
Methodology
methods
Population Density
population size
Rabies
reproduction
Risk factors
Seasons
surgery
Surveys
Urban Population
Vaccination
veterinary
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwELVQT1wQlK9Ai4yExIWoceI4cW8LoipI5YAo6s2aOHZbaJMqu4vEv2fGSVZrVYULx8QjxRk_e56_3jD2RuUZlK2F1DrlU1mR5K0oRFr5uoRWKZsBLQ2cfFHHp_LzWXm2leqLzoSN8sCj4w6qVts2K3Oftw7ZeVU3TVlbxA0CyRZ5UC_FmDdPpsYxWEod0soh3VYpSV1Oco2iVgebd2mVEu2N7rlfReEpqPjfHqu3glV8kHIrMh09ZA8mSskX4688Yvdct8t2v9M5l3DZlp9M--eP2fmCX8PwMx3o3MbFii_Xwy_3m49ppPmq56S5gRzWceSFfOjhGiMbb_tzfrNJ9MUvOywdnOM2qLHS81f4AUtahH_HP3WIuCfs9Ojjtw_H6ZRqIW2UVCscZnJohAblofVlo7yTXnvSrvEerIZW1wIqdH1ZWGQNWjndysJKK7wQClTxlO10feeeM557Z0HpRoOgTUIAiXjwpMrfeADlEnYYedzcjLIahoSu4xLsc4aay1BzmcpIlbB0bh5jJxFzyqVxZcJkpla37N9u7Ofv3GX5nlo7qk14gWA0ExjNv8CInyOsGBocsFoWpjsO6BmS2TKLXJHeoK50wvYiS-zUNip-PaPNUBGdhOtcv17iVK0gCl3Wf7EpMIwpqYssTxi_w6auS50VyKcT9mwE8ebXiTXLUIkqgnfkm7iku7wI0uRUN1HrF__DmS_Z_XkBX4g9trMa1m4fGeCqeRU6-x9UW1i0
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELdgvPCCYHwVBjISEi8E6sS5xEgIFcQ0kMoDomhv1sWxu40uGWmL2H_PXZqWhTLEY3IX2Tnf-c72-XdCPIV4iGnpMHIeQqQzhrxViYqykKdYArgh8tbA-BMcTPTHw_Twd_5TJ8D5X5d2XE9q0sxe_Px-_oYM_nVr8Dm8pKAaIga0jLJIw1VxjbxSxmUcxnpzoqC1aQvNbXg7AMft7_-4-T7rOawW13979r7gvvqplRd81f5NcaMLMuVopRW3xBVf7Yrdr5z50l6_lePuRP22mI7kKTbfooYzOY4Wcr5sfvhzuSosLRe1ZBQOimq9pEhRNjWekq-TZT2VZ5vSX_K4ImrjvXQtPis_f8YTnPO2_HP5oSIdvCMm---_vDuIuuILUQEaFjTxxFgogxCwDGkBwetgAqPZhIDOYGlyhVlRpGniKI4w4E2pE6edCkoBQnJX7FR15e8LGQfvEExhUPGxIaImDQmM018ERPAD8aoncXu2AtqwDH3dp5AVWh4uy8NlM6thIKL18FjXwZpzdY2ZbZc3OWzxP9vwr9u5jPMtj3avN-2Lupnazq5tVhpXDtM4xKWnxWOWk0RyR9MazXMuiVNqjnXFsgJTtxx2tx5IMgy8ZUcxMAKhycxA7PU4ycxdj_xkrW2WSZwbV_l6OafFW8JBdZr_gychxwbaJMN4IOQlPHmemmFCEfZA3Fsp8ebXOY7WbSeynnr3ZNOnVMdHLVg5903l5sF_i_2huL7et1dqT-wsmqV_RIHfonjcWvQviDFVng
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title A mark-resight survey method to estimate the roaming dog population in three cities in Rajasthan, India
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21834979
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1431638589
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3153649302
https://www.proquest.com/docview/885903232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-7-46
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3163189
https://doaj.org/article/7d9cd052f2de49978bb58c196794c325
Volume 7
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwELfY9sILgvFVGJWRkHghok4cf_DWok0DqROqGKp4sS6OvQ22dEpbJP577tK0LKvGCy-Rkrsoju98dz7bv2PsjUoHkJceEh9UTKQmyFuRiURHk0OplB8ApQbGJ-r4VH6e5tO_-Y5bK_jCqPcYMquE4CoTnUi1w_ZSqSUVaZiMvq9trpS2KSO34W3hGbffv3Wu_bLjjhrU_m3bfMM5dTdO3vBERw_ZgzaE5MOVzB-xe6HaZ_vfaF9Lc7iWj9v18sfsbMivoP6Z1LRP43zB58v6V_jNV2Wj-WLGCWMDY9bAMQ7k9Qyu0JPxcnbGrzeFvfhFhdQ6BO4b9FW6n8APmFPS_R3_VKGGPWGnR4dfPx4nbWmFpFBSLdCspFAICypCGfNCxSCjjYRVEyN4C6U1AnRR5HnmMUqwKthSZl56EYVQoLKnbLeaVeE542kMHpQtLAhaFASQKP9IKPxFBFChxz50etxdr2A0HAFbdyk4xhyJy5G4nHZS9ViyFo_zLWg51c64dM3kxagt_rcb_vV37uIckbQ7rWkeoO65dtQ6XVpfDvI0pmXAqaE22CPGo9FCK-azNMfPka44MgbYLA_tmQbsGYLVcsNUEb6g1bbHDjqcOIh9h_x6rW2OSLTzrQqz5RynZhmFzLn5B0-GbktJmw3SHuN38BiT20GG8XOPPVsp8ebXKUqWTSN0R707fdOlVBfnDRQ5tU0Y--J_ZPyS3V8n6oU4YLuLehleYaS3KPpsR091n-2NDk--TPpNvgSvY2n6zfD_A43XVWU
linkProvider BioMedCentral
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwELfGeIAXBOOrMMBISLwQqBN_xLx1iKmDdUjThiZerItjt4M2mdJ2Ev89vjSpGqrxwmN7F8X2ne_Ozt3vCHkj4z6I3EJknfQRVwh5yxIWKZ8KyKW0fcCrgdGJHJ7zLxfiYod8a2thspm9xjyQuhi1wbuZvN8sRZ_W9rtNG1vt-lR-CJG1jBDVMlIRl7fIbSWEwp16evCjNc2c67rb3Jq3QXHcfv6v8vdpx2vV4P7bJnzDh3XzKzcc1uF9cq-JNOlgNYUHZMcVe2Tv-3radNR8Vn9IxgM6g-pXVGE6x2RB58vq2v2mq-7SdFFShOIIoa2jIVykVQmz4PBoXo7p1br_F70sArVyjtoapBV_n8JPmOPd_Dt6VARFfETODz-ffRpGTQeGKJNcLoL1iSFjGqSH3ItMese99ghp4z1YDblOGagsEyKxIZjQ0umcJ5Zb5hmTIJPHZLcoC_eU0Ng7C1JnGhh-OwTgQU08gvVnHkC6HvnYWXFztULbMIh_3aUE-RsUl0FxGWW47JGoFY-xDbY5ttiYmvqMk8ot_rdr_vY9N3EeoLQ7o6n_KKuxaZTQqFzbvC9iH-cunCBVGlYktcG2BWNnk1iE16GuGLQZYVgWmtKHsDKIvmUGsUQYQq10j-x3OMNetx3y61bbDJIwQa5w5XIeTnAJRtYi_QdPEryb5Drpxz1Cb-BJU6H7SQize-TJSonXU8dgmteDUB317qxNl1JcTmrEchwbS_Wz_5HxK3JneDY6NsdHJ1-fk7vt3T5j-2R3US3dixAcLrKX9Yb_Az_hZCc
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwELfGkBAvCMbHCgOMhMQLYXXiODFvHVBtwKYJMTTxYl0cux1rkyptJ_Hfc5cmVcM0XnhLchfF8Z3vzh_3O8Zeq7APcW4hsE75QCYEeSsiESQ-jSFXyvaBlgaOT9Thmfx8Hp9vsdM2Fyab2is6B1InozZ4N-N3m6nok9p-44W93J_lfjXsU7WPobUKCNYySAKpbrHbCaFL0fz94Gdrm6XUdbm5NW8D43j9_b_y3ycdt1Wj-1-34RtOrHvAcsNjDe-ze02oyQcr3XjAtlyxw3Z-rP-bHzf76g_ZaMCnUF0GFZ3nGC_4fFldud98VV6aL0pOWBwY2zqO8SKvSpiix-N5OeKzdQEwflEgtXKO2xqlle6_wS-Y0-L8W35UoCY-YmfDT98_HAZNCYYgU1It0PyEkAkNykPu40x5J732hGnjPVgNuU4FJFkWx5HFaEIrp3MZWWmFF0KBih6z7aIs3C7joXcWlM40CNo8BJCoJ57Q-jMPoFyPve_0uJmt4DYMAWB3KagAhsRlSFwmMVL1WNCKx9gG3JxqbExMPclJ1TX-N2v-9js3cR6QtDutqR-U1cg0o9skubZ5Pw59mDucQiYp9khq0bihtbNRGOPnSFcMGQ3SXGhyH7BnCH7LDEJFOIQ60T221-HEwW475Fetthki0Qm5wpXLOU7hIgqt4_QfPBG6NyV11A97jN_Ak6ax7kcYZ_fYk5USr3-domlZNyLpqHenb7qU4mJcQ5ZT20Sqn_6PjF-yO6cfh-br0cmXZ-xuu7YvxB7bXlRL9xyDw0X2oh7vfwCYSWPy
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+mark-resight+survey+method+to+estimate+the+roaming+dog+population+in+three+cities+in+Rajasthan%2C+India&rft.jtitle=BMC+veterinary+research&rft.au=Hiby%2C+Lex+R&rft.au=Reece%2C+John+F&rft.au=Wright%2C+Rachel&rft.au=Jaisinghani%2C+Rajan&rft.date=2011-08-11&rft.issn=1746-6148&rft.eissn=1746-6148&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1746-6148-7-46&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_1746_6148_7_46
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1746-6148&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1746-6148&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1746-6148&client=summon