Teaching tools in Evidence Based Practice: evaluation of reusable learning objects (RLOs) for learning about Meta-analysis
Background All healthcare students are taught the principles of evidence based practice on their courses. The ability to understand the procedures used in systematically reviewing evidence reported in studies, such as meta-analysis, are an important element of evidence based practice. Meta-analysis...
Saved in:
| Published in | BMC medical education Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 18 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
London
BioMed Central
04.05.2011
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1472-6920 1472-6920 |
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-11-18 |
Cover
| Abstract | Background
All healthcare students are taught the principles of evidence based practice on their courses. The ability to understand the procedures used in systematically reviewing evidence reported in studies, such as meta-analysis, are an important element of evidence based practice. Meta-analysis is a difficult statistical concept for healthcare students to understand yet it is an important technique used in systematic reviews to pool data from studies to look at combined effectiveness of treatments. In other areas of the healthcare curricula, by supplementing lectures, workbooks and workshops with pedagogically designed, multimedia learning objects (known as reusable learning objects or RLOs) we have shown an improvement in students' perceived understanding in subjects they found difficult. In this study we describe the development and evaluation of two RLOs on meta-analysis. The RLOs supplement associated lectures and aim to improve students' understanding of meta-analysis in healthcare students.
Methods
Following a quality controlled design process two RLOs were developed and delivered to two cohorts of students, a Master in Public Health course and Postgraduate diploma in nursing course. Students' understanding of five key concepts of Meta-analysis were measured before and after a lecture and again after RLO use. RLOs were also evaluated for their educational value, learning support, media attributes and usability using closed and open questions.
Results
Students rated their understanding of meta-analysis as improved after a lecture and further improved after completing the RLOs (Wilcoxon paired test, p < 0.01 in all cases) Whilst the media components of the RLOs such as animations helped most students (86%) understand concepts including for example Forest plots, 93% of students rated usability and control as important to their learning. A small number of students stated they needed the support of a lecturer alongside the RLOs (7% 'Agreed' and 21% 'Neutral').
Conclusions
Meta-analysis RLOs that are openly accessible and unrestricted by usernames and passwords provide flexible support for students who find the process of meta-analysis difficult. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | All healthcare students are taught the principles of evidence based practice on their courses. The ability to understand the procedures used in systematically reviewing evidence reported in studies, such as meta-analysis, are an important element of evidence based practice. Meta-analysis is a difficult statistical concept for healthcare students to understand yet it is an important technique used in systematic reviews to pool data from studies to look at combined effectiveness of treatments. In other areas of the healthcare curricula, by supplementing lectures, workbooks and workshops with pedagogically designed, multimedia learning objects (known as reusable learning objects or RLOs) we have shown an improvement in students' perceived understanding in subjects they found difficult. In this study we describe the development and evaluation of two RLOs on meta-analysis. The RLOs supplement associated lectures and aim to improve students' understanding of meta-analysis in healthcare students.
Following a quality controlled design process two RLOs were developed and delivered to two cohorts of students, a Master in Public Health course and Postgraduate diploma in nursing course. Students' understanding of five key concepts of Meta-analysis were measured before and after a lecture and again after RLO use. RLOs were also evaluated for their educational value, learning support, media attributes and usability using closed and open questions.
Students rated their understanding of meta-analysis as improved after a lecture and further improved after completing the RLOs (Wilcoxon paired test, p < 0.01 in all cases) Whilst the media components of the RLOs such as animations helped most students (86%) understand concepts including for example Forest plots, 93% of students rated usability and control as important to their learning. A small number of students stated they needed the support of a lecturer alongside the RLOs (7% 'Agreed' and 21% 'Neutral').
Meta-analysis RLOs that are openly accessible and unrestricted by usernames and passwords provide flexible support for students who find the process of meta-analysis difficult. All healthcare students are taught the principles of evidence based practice on their courses. The ability to understand the procedures used in systematically reviewing evidence reported in studies, such as meta-analysis, are an important element of evidence based practice. Meta-analysis is a difficult statistical concept for healthcare students to understand yet it is an important technique used in systematic reviews to pool data from studies to look at combined effectiveness of treatments. In other areas of the healthcare curricula, by supplementing lectures, workbooks and workshops with pedagogically designed, multimedia learning objects (known as reusable learning objects or RLOs) we have shown an improvement in students' perceived understanding in subjects they found difficult. In this study we describe the development and evaluation of two RLOs on meta-analysis. The RLOs supplement associated lectures and aim to improve students' understanding of meta-analysis in healthcare students. Following a quality controlled design process two RLOs were developed and delivered to two cohorts of students, a Master in Public Health course and Postgraduate diploma in nursing course. Students' understanding of five key concepts of Meta-analysis were measured before and after a lecture and again after RLO use. RLOs were also evaluated for their educational value, learning support, media attributes and usability using closed and open questions. Students rated their understanding of meta-analysis as improved after a lecture and further improved after completing the RLOs (Wilcoxon paired test, p [less than] 0.01 in all cases) Whilst the media components of the RLOs such as animations helped most students (86%) understand concepts including for example Forest plots, 93% of students rated usability and control as important to their learning. A small number of students stated they needed the support of a lecturer alongside the RLOs (7% 'Agreed' and 21% 'Neutral'). Meta-analysis RLOs that are openly accessible and unrestricted by usernames and passwords provide flexible support for students who find the process of meta-analysis difficult. All healthcare students are taught the principles of evidence based practice on their courses. The ability to understand the procedures used in systematically reviewing evidence reported in studies, such as meta-analysis, are an important element of evidence based practice. Meta-analysis is a difficult statistical concept for healthcare students to understand yet it is an important technique used in systematic reviews to pool data from studies to look at combined effectiveness of treatments. In other areas of the healthcare curricula, by supplementing lectures, workbooks and workshops with pedagogically designed, multimedia learning objects (known as reusable learning objects or RLOs) we have shown an improvement in students' perceived understanding in subjects they found difficult. In this study we describe the development and evaluation of two RLOs on meta-analysis. The RLOs supplement associated lectures and aim to improve students' understanding of meta-analysis in healthcare students.BACKGROUNDAll healthcare students are taught the principles of evidence based practice on their courses. The ability to understand the procedures used in systematically reviewing evidence reported in studies, such as meta-analysis, are an important element of evidence based practice. Meta-analysis is a difficult statistical concept for healthcare students to understand yet it is an important technique used in systematic reviews to pool data from studies to look at combined effectiveness of treatments. In other areas of the healthcare curricula, by supplementing lectures, workbooks and workshops with pedagogically designed, multimedia learning objects (known as reusable learning objects or RLOs) we have shown an improvement in students' perceived understanding in subjects they found difficult. In this study we describe the development and evaluation of two RLOs on meta-analysis. The RLOs supplement associated lectures and aim to improve students' understanding of meta-analysis in healthcare students.Following a quality controlled design process two RLOs were developed and delivered to two cohorts of students, a Master in Public Health course and Postgraduate diploma in nursing course. Students' understanding of five key concepts of Meta-analysis were measured before and after a lecture and again after RLO use. RLOs were also evaluated for their educational value, learning support, media attributes and usability using closed and open questions.METHODSFollowing a quality controlled design process two RLOs were developed and delivered to two cohorts of students, a Master in Public Health course and Postgraduate diploma in nursing course. Students' understanding of five key concepts of Meta-analysis were measured before and after a lecture and again after RLO use. RLOs were also evaluated for their educational value, learning support, media attributes and usability using closed and open questions.Students rated their understanding of meta-analysis as improved after a lecture and further improved after completing the RLOs (Wilcoxon paired test, p < 0.01 in all cases) Whilst the media components of the RLOs such as animations helped most students (86%) understand concepts including for example Forest plots, 93% of students rated usability and control as important to their learning. A small number of students stated they needed the support of a lecturer alongside the RLOs (7% 'Agreed' and 21% 'Neutral').RESULTSStudents rated their understanding of meta-analysis as improved after a lecture and further improved after completing the RLOs (Wilcoxon paired test, p < 0.01 in all cases) Whilst the media components of the RLOs such as animations helped most students (86%) understand concepts including for example Forest plots, 93% of students rated usability and control as important to their learning. A small number of students stated they needed the support of a lecturer alongside the RLOs (7% 'Agreed' and 21% 'Neutral').Meta-analysis RLOs that are openly accessible and unrestricted by usernames and passwords provide flexible support for students who find the process of meta-analysis difficult.CONCLUSIONSMeta-analysis RLOs that are openly accessible and unrestricted by usernames and passwords provide flexible support for students who find the process of meta-analysis difficult. Background All healthcare students are taught the principles of evidence based practice on their courses. The ability to understand the procedures used in systematically reviewing evidence reported in studies, such as meta-analysis, are an important element of evidence based practice. Meta-analysis is a difficult statistical concept for healthcare students to understand yet it is an important technique used in systematic reviews to pool data from studies to look at combined effectiveness of treatments. In other areas of the healthcare curricula, by supplementing lectures, workbooks and workshops with pedagogically designed, multimedia learning objects (known as reusable learning objects or RLOs) we have shown an improvement in students' perceived understanding in subjects they found difficult. In this study we describe the development and evaluation of two RLOs on meta-analysis. The RLOs supplement associated lectures and aim to improve students' understanding of meta-analysis in healthcare students. Methods Following a quality controlled design process two RLOs were developed and delivered to two cohorts of students, a Master in Public Health course and Postgraduate diploma in nursing course. Students' understanding of five key concepts of Meta-analysis were measured before and after a lecture and again after RLO use. RLOs were also evaluated for their educational value, learning support, media attributes and usability using closed and open questions. Results Students rated their understanding of meta-analysis as improved after a lecture and further improved after completing the RLOs (Wilcoxon paired test, p [less than] 0.01 in all cases) Whilst the media components of the RLOs such as animations helped most students (86%) understand concepts including for example Forest plots, 93% of students rated usability and control as important to their learning. A small number of students stated they needed the support of a lecturer alongside the RLOs (7% 'Agreed' and 21% 'Neutral'). Conclusions Meta-analysis RLOs that are openly accessible and unrestricted by usernames and passwords provide flexible support for students who find the process of meta-analysis difficult. Background All healthcare students are taught the principles of evidence based practice on their courses. The ability to understand the procedures used in systematically reviewing evidence reported in studies, such as meta-analysis, are an important element of evidence based practice. Meta-analysis is a difficult statistical concept for healthcare students to understand yet it is an important technique used in systematic reviews to pool data from studies to look at combined effectiveness of treatments. In other areas of the healthcare curricula, by supplementing lectures, workbooks and workshops with pedagogically designed, multimedia learning objects (known as reusable learning objects or RLOs) we have shown an improvement in students' perceived understanding in subjects they found difficult. In this study we describe the development and evaluation of two RLOs on meta-analysis. The RLOs supplement associated lectures and aim to improve students' understanding of meta-analysis in healthcare students. Methods Following a quality controlled design process two RLOs were developed and delivered to two cohorts of students, a Master in Public Health course and Postgraduate diploma in nursing course. Students' understanding of five key concepts of Meta-analysis were measured before and after a lecture and again after RLO use. RLOs were also evaluated for their educational value, learning support, media attributes and usability using closed and open questions. Results Students rated their understanding of meta-analysis as improved after a lecture and further improved after completing the RLOs (Wilcoxon paired test, p < 0.01 in all cases) Whilst the media components of the RLOs such as animations helped most students (86%) understand concepts including for example Forest plots, 93% of students rated usability and control as important to their learning. A small number of students stated they needed the support of a lecturer alongside the RLOs (7% 'Agreed' and 21% 'Neutral'). Conclusions Meta-analysis RLOs that are openly accessible and unrestricted by usernames and passwords provide flexible support for students who find the process of meta-analysis difficult. BACKGROUND: All healthcare students are taught the principles of evidence based practice on their courses. The ability to understand the procedures used in systematically reviewing evidence reported in studies, such as meta-analysis, are an important element of evidence based practice. Meta-analysis is a difficult statistical concept for healthcare students to understand yet it is an important technique used in systematic reviews to pool data from studies to look at combined effectiveness of treatments. In other areas of the healthcare curricula, by supplementing lectures, workbooks and workshops with pedagogically designed, multimedia learning objects (known as reusable learning objects or RLOs) we have shown an improvement in students' perceived understanding in subjects they found difficult. In this study we describe the development and evaluation of two RLOs on meta-analysis. The RLOs supplement associated lectures and aim to improve students' understanding of meta-analysis in healthcare students. METHODS: Following a quality controlled design process two RLOs were developed and delivered to two cohorts of students, a Master in Public Health course and Postgraduate diploma in nursing course. Students' understanding of five key concepts of Meta-analysis were measured before and after a lecture and again after RLO use. RLOs were also evaluated for their educational value, learning support, media attributes and usability using closed and open questions. RESULTS: Students rated their understanding of meta-analysis as improved after a lecture and further improved after completing the RLOs (Wilcoxon paired test, p < 0.01 in all cases) Whilst the media components of the RLOs such as animations helped most students (86%) understand concepts including for example Forest plots, 93% of students rated usability and control as important to their learning. A small number of students stated they needed the support of a lecturer alongside the RLOs (7% 'Agreed' and 21% 'Neutral'). CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis RLOs that are openly accessible and unrestricted by usernames and passwords provide flexible support for students who find the process of meta-analysis difficult. Abstract Background All healthcare students are taught the principles of evidence based practice on their courses. The ability to understand the procedures used in systematically reviewing evidence reported in studies, such as meta-analysis, are an important element of evidence based practice. Meta-analysis is a difficult statistical concept for healthcare students to understand yet it is an important technique used in systematic reviews to pool data from studies to look at combined effectiveness of treatments. In other areas of the healthcare curricula, by supplementing lectures, workbooks and workshops with pedagogically designed, multimedia learning objects (known as reusable learning objects or RLOs) we have shown an improvement in students' perceived understanding in subjects they found difficult. In this study we describe the development and evaluation of two RLOs on meta-analysis. The RLOs supplement associated lectures and aim to improve students' understanding of meta-analysis in healthcare students. Methods Following a quality controlled design process two RLOs were developed and delivered to two cohorts of students, a Master in Public Health course and Postgraduate diploma in nursing course. Students' understanding of five key concepts of Meta-analysis were measured before and after a lecture and again after RLO use. RLOs were also evaluated for their educational value, learning support, media attributes and usability using closed and open questions. Results Students rated their understanding of meta-analysis as improved after a lecture and further improved after completing the RLOs (Wilcoxon paired test, p < 0.01 in all cases) Whilst the media components of the RLOs such as animations helped most students (86%) understand concepts including for example Forest plots, 93% of students rated usability and control as important to their learning. A small number of students stated they needed the support of a lecturer alongside the RLOs (7% 'Agreed' and 21% 'Neutral'). Conclusions Meta-analysis RLOs that are openly accessible and unrestricted by usernames and passwords provide flexible support for students who find the process of meta-analysis difficult. |
| ArticleNumber | 18 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Leonardi-Bee, Jo Wharrad, Heather Bath-Hextall, Fiona |
| AuthorAffiliation | 1 School of Nursing, Midwifery & Physiotherapy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK 2 Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 School of Nursing, Midwifery & Physiotherapy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK – name: 2 Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Fiona surname: Bath-Hextall fullname: Bath-Hextall, Fiona organization: School of Nursing, Midwifery & Physiotherapy, University of Nottingham – sequence: 2 givenname: Heather surname: Wharrad fullname: Wharrad, Heather email: heather.wharrad@nottingham.ac.uk organization: School of Nursing, Midwifery & Physiotherapy, University of Nottingham – sequence: 3 givenname: Jo surname: Leonardi-Bee fullname: Leonardi-Bee, Jo organization: Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21542905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kk1v1DAQhiNURD_gzA1Z4gAc0tpOYjsckNqqQKVFRaicrYkz2XqVtVs7Wan8erxNWbqoRTk4mnnfxzOe2c92nHeYZa8ZPWRMiSNWSp6LmtOcsZypZ9neJrLz4H83249xQSmTqmAvsl3OqpLXtNrLfl0imCvr5mTwvo_EOnK2si06g-QEIrbkewAzWIMfCa6gH2Gw3hHfkYBjhKZH0iMEtyb4ZoFmiOT9j9lF_EA6H_7moPHjQL7hADk46G-jjS-z5x30EV_dnwfZz89nl6df89nFl_PT41neCF4NOQMuCyFlzRRPkUZVSnHR0cKALLAVFBRtAGQFQkjDaVcKptq2Ng2FGpqyOMjOJ27rYaGvg11CuNUerL4L-DDXEFKHPWoqUZaiE5juKIuW1VTKhnJZq8YIKmRifZpY12OzxNagGwL0W9DtjLNXeu5XumC8KFiRACcToLH-CcB2xvilXs9Rr-eoGdNMJci7-yqCvxkxDnppo8G-B4d-jFrJMo26liIp307KOaT2rOt8gpq1Wh_zqpZUyapKqsNHVOlrcWlN2rjOpviW4c3DZ9iU_2evkuBoEpjgYwzYbSRs3YQSj_RU_eMwdrhbtlSL7f_jo5MvphvcHINe-DGkFYtPWn4DeC__FQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3928_00220124_20210804_05 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_021_01484_2 crossref_primary_10_3389_fams_2021_593205 crossref_primary_10_1186_1756_0500_5_571 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12912_021_00681_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nedt_2021_105021 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2019_029720 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2016_013905 crossref_primary_10_1177_1460458220977586 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci13070634 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0253471 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_017_0432_3 crossref_primary_10_3310_hsdr06410 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1097/00001888-200403000-00006 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2003.11.001 10.1054/nedt.2001.0602 10.1186/1472-6955-7-2 10.7748/nr2010.10.18.1.72.c8049 10.1207/s15516709cog2704_5 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.019 10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1655 10.1186/1472-6920-5-1 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9 10.1111/j.1470-3327.2005.00614.x |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Bath-Hextall et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. COPYRIGHT 2011 BioMed Central Ltd. Copyright ©2011 Bath-Hextall et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011 Bath-Hextall et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Bath-Hextall et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2011 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: Copyright ©2011 Bath-Hextall et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011 Bath-Hextall et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-11-18 |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals (ND) |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Education |
| EISSN | 1472-6920 |
| EndPage | 18 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_07e746f6e58843d19077b02798bc6067 PMC3123313 oai_biomedcentral_com_1472_6920_11_18 A259708755 21542905 10_1186_1472_6920_11_18 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | United Kingdom |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United Kingdom |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0-V 0R~ 23N 2VQ 2WC 4.4 53G 5GY 5VS 6J9 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACIHN ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS AQUVI ARALO AZQEC BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C1A C6C CCPQU CJNVE CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EBLON EBS EJD EMB EMOBN F5P FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR IPNFZ ITC IVC KQ8 M0P M0T M1P M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQEDU PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RIG RNS ROL RPM RSV SHS SOJ SV3 TR2 UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB AAYXX ALIPV CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 7X8 -5C -5G -A0 -BR 3V. ABVAZ ACRMQ ADINQ AFGXO AFNRJ C24 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-b625t-1a2736779182b62b858826f03ca73ed60a80baa75a667c20f4618dd9cb0a9ab43 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 1472-6920 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:32:59 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:18:18 EDT 2025 Wed May 22 07:17:00 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 04 16:48:12 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:39:07 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:38:36 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:47:11 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:00 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:24:54 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:22:27 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Wilcoxon Paired Test Forest Plot Open Educational Resource Signed Rank Wilcoxon Paired Test Healthcare Student |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b625t-1a2736779182b62b858826f03ca73ed60a80baa75a667c20f4618dd9cb0a9ab43 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/1472-6920-11-18 |
| PMID | 21542905 |
| PQID | 874017976 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 1 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_07e746f6e58843d19077b02798bc6067 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3123313 biomedcentral_primary_oai_biomedcentral_com_1472_6920_11_18 proquest_miscellaneous_874017976 gale_infotracmisc_A259708755 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A259708755 pubmed_primary_21542905 crossref_primary_10_1186_1472_6920_11_18 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_1472_6920_11_18 springer_journals_10_1186_1472_6920_11_18 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2011-05-04 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2011-05-04 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2011 text: 2011-05-04 day: 04 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | BMC medical education |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | BMC Med Educ |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Med Educ |
| PublicationYear | 2011 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BMC |
| References | Flloyd, Galvin, Roop, Oermann, Nordstram (CR18) 2010; 18 Ainsworth (CR16) 1999; 33 Nurmi, Jaakkola (CR19) 2005; 2 Windle, Wharrad, Bromage, Clouder, Gordon, Thistlethwaite (CR9) 2010 Wilkinson, Forbes, Bloomfield, Gee (CR22) 2004; 41 Wharrad, Windle, Bromage, Clouder, Gordon, Thistlethwaite (CR21) 2010 Ainsworth, Loizou (CR17) 2003; 2 Lymn, Bath-Hextall, Wharrad (CR7) 2008; 7 McGreal (CR10) 2004; 1 CR11 Brickell, Kanuth, Freeman, Larshaw, Larson (CR13) 2006; 19 Cullum, Ciliska, Marks, Haynes, Cullum, Ciliska, Marks, Haynes (CR3) 2008 Wharrad, Kent, Allcock, Wood (CR5) 2001; 21 Morales, Carmichael, Wharrad, Bradley, Windle (CR12) 2006 Bond, Ingram, Ryan (CR26) 2008; 50 Boyle, Cook, Searle (CR20) 2003 Al Shehri (CR14) 2003; 22 Schwartz, Holton (CR24) 2000; 26 CR4 CR6 Manochehr (CR25) 2006; 18 Dawes, Summerskill, Glasziou, Cartabellotta, Martin, Hopayian, Porzsolt, Burls, Osborne (CR1) 2005; 5 Farrell (CR23) 2006; 13 Sackett, Gray, Haynes, Richardson (CR2) 1996; 312 Windle, McCormick, Dandrea, Wharrad (CR8) 2010 Fleiszer, Posel, Steacy (CR15) 2004; 79 DL Schwartz (468_CR24) 2000; 26 HJ Wharrad (468_CR21) 2010 J Brickell (468_CR13) 2006; 19 ST Bond (468_CR26) 2008; 50 R Windle (468_CR9) 2010 468_CR11 N-N Manochehr (468_CR25) 2006; 18 S Nurmi (468_CR19) 2005; 2 JA Flloyd (468_CR18) 2010; 18 J Lymn (468_CR7) 2008; 7 MY Al Shehri (468_CR14) 2003; 22 N Cullum (468_CR3) 2008 SE Ainsworth (468_CR16) 1999; 33 SE Ainsworth (468_CR17) 2003; 2 R Morales (468_CR12) 2006 DM Fleiszer (468_CR15) 2004; 79 A Wilkinson (468_CR22) 2004; 41 M Dawes (468_CR1) 2005; 5 HJ Wharrad (468_CR5) 2001; 21 R Windle (468_CR8) 2010 T Boyle (468_CR20) 2003 468_CR6 R McGreal (468_CR10) 2004; 1 468_CR4 M Farrell (468_CR23) 2006; 13 DL Sackett (468_CR2) 1996; 312 15634359 - BMC Med Educ. 2005 Jan 5;5(1):1 17042357 - Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2006 Oct;13(6):14-7 11185788 - J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Nov;26(6):1655-65 18215261 - BMC Nurs. 2008 Jan 23;7:2 8555924 - BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71-2 14985195 - Acad Med. 2004 Mar;79(3):229-35 11559012 - Nurse Educ Today. 2001 Oct;21(7):579-88 16910236 - Clin Lab Sci. 2006 Summer;19(3):184-7 15050852 - Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 May;41(4):411-24 15008299 - West Afr J Med. 2003 Dec;22(4):329-33 16279973 - Health Info Libr J. 2005 Dec;22 Suppl 2:20-32 21138087 - Nurse Res. 2010;18(1):72-86 |
| References_xml | – volume: 79 start-page: 229 year: 2004 end-page: 235 ident: CR15 article-title: New directions in medical e-curricula and the use of digital repositories publication-title: Acad Med doi: 10.1097/00001888-200403000-00006 – volume: 41 start-page: 411 year: 2004 end-page: 424 ident: CR22 article-title: An exploration of four web based open and flexible learning modules in post-registration nursing publication-title: Int J Nurs Stud doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2003.11.001 – start-page: 1 year: 2008 end-page: 8 ident: CR3 article-title: An introduction to evidence-based nursing publication-title: Evidence based nursing. An introduction – volume: 21 start-page: 579 issue: 7 year: 2001 end-page: 588 ident: CR5 article-title: A comparison of CAL with a conventional method of delivery of cell biology to undergraduate nursing students using an experimental design publication-title: Nurse Education Today doi: 10.1054/nedt.2001.0602 – year: 2003 ident: CR20 article-title: Learning objects, pedagogy and reuse publication-title: Learning technology in transition. From individual enthusiasm to institutional implementation – year: 2010 ident: CR21 article-title: Case studies of creating reusable inter professional e-learning objects publication-title: Interprofessional E-Learning and Collaborative Work: Practices and Technologies – ident: CR4 – volume: 2 start-page: 11 year: 2005 ident: CR19 article-title: Problems underlying the learning object approach publication-title: Int J Instr Tech & Dist Learning – volume: 19 start-page: 184 year: 2006 end-page: 187 ident: CR13 article-title: Learning objects: resources for instruction publication-title: Clin Lab Sci – year: 2010 ident: CR9 article-title: Reusable learning objects in healthcare education publication-title: Interprofessional E-Learning and Collaborative Work: Practices and Technologies – ident: CR6 – volume: 18 start-page: 10 year: 2006 end-page: 14 ident: CR25 article-title: The influence of learning styles on learners in e-learning environments:An empirical study publication-title: CHEER – volume: 7 start-page: 1 2 year: 2008 ident: CR7 article-title: Pharmacology education for nurse prescribing students - a lesson in reusable learning objects publication-title: BMC Nursing doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-7-2 – volume: 18 start-page: 72 year: 2010 end-page: 86 ident: CR18 article-title: Graphics for dissemination of meta-analysis to staff nurses publication-title: Nurse Researcher doi: 10.7748/nr2010.10.18.1.72.c8049 – year: 2006 ident: CR12 article-title: Developing a Multi-Method Evaluation Strategy for Reusable Learning Objects: an approach informed by Cultural-Historical Activity Theory publication-title: Proceedings of the 1st European Practice-based and Practitioner Research Conference - Improving quality in teaching and learning: Developmental work and Implementation challenges, University of Leuven, Belgium – volume: 2 start-page: 669 year: 2003 end-page: 681 ident: CR17 article-title: The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams publication-title: Cognitive Science doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2704_5 – volume: 50 start-page: 601 year: 2008 end-page: 612 ident: CR26 article-title: Reuse, repurposing and learning design - lessons from the DART project publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.019 – volume: 1 start-page: 21 year: 2004 end-page: 33 ident: CR10 article-title: Learning objects: a practical definition publication-title: International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning – year: 2010 ident: CR8 article-title: The characteristics of reusable learning objects that enhance learning: a case study in health science education publication-title: British Journal of Educational Technology – ident: CR11 – volume: 26 start-page: 1655 issue: 6 year: 2000 end-page: 1665 ident: CR24 article-title: Tool use and the effect of action on the imagination publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1655 – volume: 13 start-page: 14 year: 2006 end-page: 17 ident: CR23 article-title: Learning differently. E-learning in nurse education publication-title: Nursing Management – volume: 5 start-page: 1 year: 2005 ident: CR1 article-title: Sicily statement on evidence-based practice publication-title: BMC Medical Education doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-5-1 – volume: 22 start-page: 329 year: 2003 end-page: 333 ident: CR14 article-title: Current issues in medical education publication-title: West Afr J Med – volume: 312 start-page: 71 year: 1996 end-page: 72 ident: CR2 article-title: Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't publication-title: British Medical Journal doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 – volume: 33 start-page: 131 year: 1999 end-page: 152 ident: CR16 article-title: A functional taxonomy of multiple representations publication-title: Computers and Education doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9 – volume: 2 start-page: 669 year: 2003 ident: 468_CR17 publication-title: Cognitive Science doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2704_5 – volume: 5 start-page: 1 year: 2005 ident: 468_CR1 publication-title: BMC Medical Education doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-5-1 – volume: 312 start-page: 71 year: 1996 ident: 468_CR2 publication-title: British Medical Journal doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 – volume: 7 start-page: 1 2 year: 2008 ident: 468_CR7 publication-title: BMC Nursing doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-7-2 – volume: 21 start-page: 579 issue: 7 year: 2001 ident: 468_CR5 publication-title: Nurse Education Today doi: 10.1054/nedt.2001.0602 – ident: 468_CR11 – volume-title: Learning technology in transition. From individual enthusiasm to institutional implementation year: 2003 ident: 468_CR20 – volume: 18 start-page: 72 year: 2010 ident: 468_CR18 publication-title: Nurse Researcher doi: 10.7748/nr2010.10.18.1.72.c8049 – volume-title: Proceedings of the 1st European Practice-based and Practitioner Research Conference - Improving quality in teaching and learning: Developmental work and Implementation challenges, University of Leuven, Belgium year: 2006 ident: 468_CR12 – volume: 50 start-page: 601 year: 2008 ident: 468_CR26 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.019 – volume: 1 start-page: 21 year: 2004 ident: 468_CR10 publication-title: International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning – start-page: 1 volume-title: Evidence based nursing. An introduction year: 2008 ident: 468_CR3 – volume: 18 start-page: 10 year: 2006 ident: 468_CR25 publication-title: CHEER – volume-title: Interprofessional E-Learning and Collaborative Work: Practices and Technologies year: 2010 ident: 468_CR21 – volume: 26 start-page: 1655 issue: 6 year: 2000 ident: 468_CR24 publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1655 – volume: 22 start-page: 329 year: 2003 ident: 468_CR14 publication-title: West Afr J Med – volume: 41 start-page: 411 year: 2004 ident: 468_CR22 publication-title: Int J Nurs Stud doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2003.11.001 – volume: 13 start-page: 14 year: 2006 ident: 468_CR23 publication-title: Nursing Management – volume: 19 start-page: 184 year: 2006 ident: 468_CR13 publication-title: Clin Lab Sci – volume: 79 start-page: 229 year: 2004 ident: 468_CR15 publication-title: Acad Med doi: 10.1097/00001888-200403000-00006 – volume-title: British Journal of Educational Technology year: 2010 ident: 468_CR8 – volume-title: Interprofessional E-Learning and Collaborative Work: Practices and Technologies year: 2010 ident: 468_CR9 – volume: 2 start-page: 11 year: 2005 ident: 468_CR19 publication-title: Int J Instr Tech & Dist Learning – ident: 468_CR6 doi: 10.1111/j.1470-3327.2005.00614.x – ident: 468_CR4 – volume: 33 start-page: 131 year: 1999 ident: 468_CR16 publication-title: Computers and Education doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9 – reference: 11559012 - Nurse Educ Today. 2001 Oct;21(7):579-88 – reference: 16910236 - Clin Lab Sci. 2006 Summer;19(3):184-7 – reference: 17042357 - Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2006 Oct;13(6):14-7 – reference: 15634359 - BMC Med Educ. 2005 Jan 5;5(1):1 – reference: 11185788 - J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Nov;26(6):1655-65 – reference: 21138087 - Nurse Res. 2010;18(1):72-86 – reference: 15008299 - West Afr J Med. 2003 Dec;22(4):329-33 – reference: 8555924 - BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71-2 – reference: 15050852 - Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 May;41(4):411-24 – reference: 14985195 - Acad Med. 2004 Mar;79(3):229-35 – reference: 16279973 - Health Info Libr J. 2005 Dec;22 Suppl 2:20-32 – reference: 18215261 - BMC Nurs. 2008 Jan 23;7:2 |
| SSID | ssj0017831 |
| Score | 1.9767678 |
| Snippet | Background
All healthcare students are taught the principles of evidence based practice on their courses. The ability to understand the procedures used in... All healthcare students are taught the principles of evidence based practice on their courses. The ability to understand the procedures used in systematically... Background All healthcare students are taught the principles of evidence based practice on their courses. The ability to understand the procedures used in... BACKGROUND: All healthcare students are taught the principles of evidence based practice on their courses. The ability to understand the procedures used in... Abstract Background All healthcare students are taught the principles of evidence based practice on their courses. The ability to understand the procedures... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral biomedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 18 |
| SubjectTerms | Analysis Computer-Assisted Instruction Education Education, Public Health Professional - methods Evidence-based medicine Evidence-Based Practice - education Humans Medical Education Medical students Meta-Analysis as Topic Research Article Students, Nursing Surveys and Questionnaires Teaching Teaching - methods Theory of Medicine/Bioethics |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals (ND) dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NT90wDI8mDtMu075XxqYcJg0OHWmb5mM7wQRC0942TSBxi9I23ZCeWkT7Lvz12Gn6ICC0C9d8qGlsx3Zi_0zIxwyEGRRrmeYW3FXOdZPavHYpDFfMMgf-GyYnL36KoxP-_bQ8vVHqC2PCJnjgaeN2mXSSi1Y4zKgsGtBfUlbgS2lV1WB8-zxyptnsTIX3A6l8JcKMyzwVOmcB1CdTYnfdhhllWOsjSnRfRvrJw_jfPaxvaKvbkZS3nlO9ljp8Rp4G85LuTb_1nDxy3QvyeBEe0F-Sy-MQPUnHvl8O9Kyjc11Rug8KraG_Q9rUF3oNBE77ll641YBpVjTUmfhL-wrvcAa6_efHr2GHgvV73efjnenCjTa1AfbkFTk5PDj-dpSG8gtpBU7RmGYWTBshpQYXBFoqBRTIRcuK2srCNYJZxSprZWmFkHXOWi4y1TS6rpjVtuLFa7LR9Z17Syg0torz2jLtOGIG2lI7lP28VFlb6IR8jYhgzieoDYPg13EPyKFBEhokIfgvJlMJ-TyTzNQB2RwLbCyN93CUuDthez1h_tK9Q_eRB6IF-QbgURN41PyPRxPyCTnI4JkBC6ttSH2AzUH0LbMHPqjE0gJlQraikSDrddRNZx402IUBcp3rV4PxlRUl2JYJeTOx5HrJYNSB0cFgsoyYNfqnuKc7--eRxguwa4qsSMjOzNYmHHHDfRu2-RAb9o48me7uy5TxLbIxXqzcezD-xuqDl_MrmJNRKQ priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals dbid: C6C link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3Nb9UwDI9gSIgLgvFVNqYckNgOhaRJ8wGnbWKaEA8Q2qTdorRNx6SnFq19F_762X3p2_rGDrvGiZrWdmLX9s-EvOegzHCx5mnmwV2V0lapz8qQwnTDPAvgv2Fx8uyHOj6V387yswiShLUwN-P33KhPXOosVRZ8HEy9Mg_Jo5wLNURl1eEqXKCN4BG35z-L1mrZ55MraEDqv30e37iQ1pMl1yKmw0V09Iw8jRYk3V-y_Dl5EJpNbL4cEzU2yeNZjJe_IP9OYrIk7dt23tGLho5tROkB3F8V_RWrpD7Ta9xv2tb0Miw6rKqisa3EOW0L_GXT0d3f3392exSM3WvakN5MZ6H3qY8oJy_J6dHXk8PjNHZbSAvwgfqUe7BklNYWPA4YKUwOxreqmSi9FqFSzBtWeK9zr5QuM1ZLxU1V2bJg3vpCildko2mb8IZQGKyNlKVnNkiECPS5DajqWW54LWxCvkwY4v4ukTUcYl1PKaB2DtnpkJ3grjhuEvJxZJ8rI5A59tOYu8GhMer2gt3VgvFJd049QHmYbGgYAJl0UZcd00FLVauARb6iApNK6wLce2uKEvxBnZAPKE0OjwjYWOljpQN8HATbcvvgcmrsJJAnZHsyE1S7nJDpKI8OSZgP14R20bmhkaIGUzIhr5fiudoy2HBgYzBYrCeCO3mnKaW5-DMAiwswYwQXCdkbRdzFE62764O9vcfcLfJk-Uc-T5ncJhv95SK8A5OuL3YGdb4CjxhDRg priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | Teaching tools in Evidence Based Practice: evaluation of reusable learning objects (RLOs) for learning about Meta-analysis |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1472-6920-11-18 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21542905 https://www.proquest.com/docview/874017976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-18 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3123313 https://doaj.org/article/07e746f6e58843d19077b02798bc6067 |
| Volume | 11 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9swEBdrC2MvY-s-6q0Lehhse3An27Ikb4zRhJYySCmlgbAXIdtyVwj2Fiew_fe7U-RkTtu9GKIPR5budPeT7oOQtxEwMwjWNIwNwFXOszI0cWFDaK6YYRbwGzonj8_F2YR_m6bTTTogP4HtndAO80lN5rOj37_-fAWG_-IYXomPEZdxKDLAQWiepXbIHoglgUhszDdXClK55ITrxj7Ozx0v2PJ9n_VElovsf3v__keAbRtXbt2wOsF1-oQ89honPV6RyFPywNb7mKzZG3bsk4djf7_-jLRX3riSLppm1tKbmnZpR-kQ5F1JL7xX1Se6iRNOm4rO7bJFLyzq01Bc0ybHI56Wgla8KXR20HRsFyY0PhzKczI5PbkanYU-LUOYA1hahJEBlUdImQE0gZJcpaCli4olhZGJLQUziuXGyNQIIYuYVVxEqiyzImcmMzlPXpDduqntAaFQWCnOC8MyyzGWoEkzi3tCnKqoSrKAfO6thP65CsGhMSh2vwb4U-M6alxHwDU6UgE56tZNFz7iOSbemGmHfJS43eH9ukP3T_c2HSIh9AbkCpr5tfZMr5m0kotKWPQGTkrQvaTMWSwzlRcAHGVA3iEZaaRuGFhhvEsETA5G5dLHgE0lphxIA3LYawl7QNGrph0haqxCw7naNstWu4yLEnTOgLxc0eV6yKDsgTLCoLPsUWzvm_o19c0PF4E8AX0niZKAfOhoW3ece9-Evfr_F7wmj1an9WnI-CHZXcyX9g2oe4t8QHbkVA7I3vDk_OISfo3EaOCOTgaOweF5Ofz-F2-rU5s |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3db9MwED-NTgJeEIyvwAA_ILE9BJzEsR146hBTKe1A0El7s5zE2SZVydS0L_z1nF2nIx174NVnK07uzve7-D4A3kaozGhY0zDW6K4ylpWhjgsT4nRJNTXov9nk5OkJH52y8Vl6tgNRlwvjot27K0l3Uju1lvxDxEQc8gy9HRuEJe_ArkQowgawOxyOf403VwdCJpGv4fOPZVt57fOeOXJV-2-ezX8Zp-3Aya3bU2eUjh_CA48myXDN_kewY-o924jZB23swd2pvzt_DL9nPnCSLJtm3pLLmnQtRckR2rKS_PAZUx_JdQ1w0lRkYVatzbAivsXEOWly-_umJQc_J9_bQ4LA95rmQp3J1Cx1qH3Fkydwevxl9nkU-s4LYY7-0DKMNKIaLkSG3geO5DJFIM4rmhRaJKbkVEuaay1SzbkoYloxHsmyzIqc6kznLHkKg7qpzXMgOFhJxgpNM8NsuUCdZsaqfZzKqEqyAD71GKKu1lU2lK173aegNCjLTmXZia6LimQA7zv2qcIXNbe9NebKOTeS31xwsFnQPenWqUdWHnobcgPN4lx5vVZUGMF4xY1N-E1KhFdC5OjqZzIv0DcUAbyz0qTscYEbK7TPesCPYwtvqSG6n8J2FUgD2O_NRDUvemTSyaOyJBsbV5tm1SrXVFEgrAzg2Vo8N1tGPId4g-Ji0RPc3jv1KfXlhSsyniCkSaIkgMNOxJU_3drbPtiL_5j7Bu6NZtOJmnw9-fYS7q__1KchZfswWC5W5hVCvWX-2iv3H351S6Q |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3Nb9UwDI9gSBMXNMbHCgNyQGI7lKVtmqRw2gZPA_bGhDZptyhp0zHpqZ1e-y7767Hb9I2-sQPXOFHTxo7t2v6ZkPcRCDMo1jSMDbirnGdFaOLchTBdMcMc-G9YnDw9EUfn_PtFeuFzc5oh230ISfY1DYjSVLV710XZi7gSexGXcSgy8HwwIUs9JI846j2M1YrDZRBBqiTyaD7_WLRS4T4bKaYOv__uLf2XmlpNoVyJo3bqabJBnni7ku73jPCUPHDVJrZk9ukbm2R96qPoz8jNmU-hpG1dzxp6VdGhuSg9AK1W0FNfO_WJ3qKB07qkc7dosNaK-mYTl7S2-COnoTu_jn82uxRM4Ftal_RMp641ofHYJ8_J-eTr2eFR6HswhBY8ozaMDNg3QsoM_BAYsSoFk1yULMmNTFwhmFHMGiNTI4TMY1ZyEamiyHLLTGYsT16Qtaqu3BahMFgqznPDMscRONCkmcMLIE5VVCZZQD6PDkRf93gbGhGwxxTgC43HqfE4wYnRkQrIx-H4dO7hzbHLxkx3bo4SdxfsLBcMT7p36gHyw2hD3UA9v9RewjWTTnJRCoelv0kBhpaUFpz-TNkcvEQZkA_ITRovDthYbnz9A3wchODS--CISuwvkAZkezQTBD4fkenAjxpJmCVXuXrR6K69ogQDMyAve_ZcbhksO7A8GCyWI8YdvdOYUl397uDGEzBukigJyO7A4trfc819H-zVf8x9R9ZPv0z08beTH6_J4_6XfRoyvk3W2vnCvQGbr7VvO8n-AywLTno |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teaching+tools+in+Evidence+Based+Practice%3A+evaluation+of+reusable+learning+objects+for+learning+about+Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=BMC+medical+education&rft.au=Bath-Hextall%2C+Fiona&rft.au=Wharrad%2C+Heather&rft.au=Leonardi-Bee%2C+Jo&rft.date=2011-05-04&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1472-6920&rft.eissn=1472-6920&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=18&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1472-6920-11-18&rft.externalDocID=A259708755 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1472-6920&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1472-6920&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1472-6920&client=summon |