EULAR report on the use of ultrasonography in painful knee osteoarthritis. Part 2: Exploring decision rules for clinical utility

Background: Synovial inflammation (as defined by hypertrophy and effusion) is common in osteoarthritis (OA) and may be important in both pain and structural progression. Objective: To determine if decision rules can be devised from clinical findings and ultrasonography (US) to allow recognition of s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 64; no. 12; pp. 1710 - 1714
Main Authors Conaghan, P, D’Agostino, M A, Ravaud, P, Baron, G, Le Bars, M, Grassi, W, Martin-Mola, E, Wakefield, R, Brasseur, J-L, So, A, Backhaus, M, Malaise, M, Burmester, G, Schmidely, N, Emery, P, Dougados, M
Format Journal Article Web Resource
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism 01.12.2005
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Synovial inflammation (as defined by hypertrophy and effusion) is common in osteoarthritis (OA) and may be important in both pain and structural progression. Objective: To determine if decision rules can be devised from clinical findings and ultrasonography (US) to allow recognition of synovial inflammation in patients with painful knee OA. Methods: A EULAR-ESCISIT cross sectional, multicentre study enrolled subjects with painful OA knee who had clinical, radiographic, and US evaluations. A classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was performed to find combinations of predictor variables that would provide high sensitivity and specificity for clinically detecting synovitis and effusion in individual subjects. A range of definitions for the two key US variables, synovitis and effusion (using different combinations of synovial thickness, depth, and appearance), were also included in exploratory analyses. Results: 600 patients with knee OA were included in the analysis. For both knee synovitis and joint effusion, the sensitivity and specificity were poor, yielding unsatisfactory likelihood ratios (75% sensitivity, 45% specificity, and positive LR of 1.36 for knee synovitis; 71.6% sensitivity, 43.2% specificity, and positive LR of 1.26 for joint effusion). The exploratory analyses did not improve the sensitivity and specificity (demonstrating positive LRs of between 1.26 and 1.57). Conclusion: Although it is possible to determine clinical and radiological predictors of OA inflammation in populations, CART analysis could not be used to devise useful clinical decision rules for an individual subject. Thus sensitive imaging techniques such as US remain the most useful tool for demonstrating synovial inflammation of the knee at the individual level.
Bibliography:Correspondence to:
 Professor Dougados
 Rheumatology Department, Cochin Hospital, 27, rue du Faubourg St Jacques, 75014 Paris, France; maxime.dougados@cch.ap-hop-paris.fr
ark:/67375/NVC-5ZX1HM0N-L
istex:1F4CD3A952EC64B6C14DCA711FDEBFA8FEA98F18
href:annrheumdis-64-1710.pdf
local:0641710
PMID:15878902
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
scopus-id:2-s2.0-27944481207
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/ard.2005.038026