Minimally important difference in diffuse systemic sclerosis: results from the d-penicillamine study

Objective: To estimate minimally important differences (MIDs) in scores for the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) and Health Assessment Questionnaire—Disability Index (HAQ-DI) in a clinical trial on diffuse systemic sclerosis (SSc). Participants and methods: 134 people participated in a 2-year, doub...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 65; no. 10; pp. 1325 - 1329
Main Authors Khanna, D, Furst, D E, Hays, R D, Park, G S, Wong, W K, Seibold, J R, Mayes, M D, White, B, Wigley, F F, Weisman, M, Barr, W, Moreland, L, Medsger, T A, Steen, V D, Martin, R W, Collier, D, Weinstein, A, Lally, E V, Varga, J, Weiner, S R, Andrews, B, Abeles, M, Clements, P J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism 01.10.2006
BMJ
Elsevier Limited
BMJ Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI10.1136/ard.2005.050187

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objective: To estimate minimally important differences (MIDs) in scores for the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) and Health Assessment Questionnaire—Disability Index (HAQ-DI) in a clinical trial on diffuse systemic sclerosis (SSc). Participants and methods: 134 people participated in a 2-year, double-blind, randomised clinical trial comparing efficacy of low-dose and high-dose d-penicillamine in diffuse SSc. At 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, the investigator was asked to rate the change in the patient’s health since entering the study: markedly worsened, moderately worsened, slightly worsened, unchanged, slightly improved, moderately improved or markedly improved. Patients who were rated as slightly improved were defined as the minimally changed subgroup and compared with patients rated as moderately or markedly improved. Results: The MID estimates for the mRSS improvement ranged from 3.2 to 5.3 (0.40–0.66 effect size) and for the HAQ-DI from 0.10 to 0.14 (0.15–0.21 effect size). Patients who were rated to improve more than slightly were found to improve by 6.9–14.2 (0.86–1.77 effect size) on the mRSS and 0.21–0.55 (0.32–0.83 effect size) on the HAQ-DI score. Conclusion: MID estimates are provided for improvement in the mRSS and HAQ-DI scores, which can help in interpreting clinical trials on patients with SSc and be used for sample size calculation for future clinical trials on diffuse SSc.
Bibliography:href:annrheumdis-65-1325.pdf
istex:EA993A9DCBA4589098C115D65BF87C88A7C8E6FC
Correspondence to:
 D Khanna
 Division of Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, ML 0563, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0563, USA;dinesh.khanna@uc.edu
PMID:16540546
ark:/67375/NVC-R1XK399K-3
local:0651325
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism
Current address: Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California, USA
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/ard.2005.050187