Primary care physicians' use of family history for cancer risk assessment

• Published in: BMC family practice Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 45
• Main Authors: Flynn, Brian S, Wood, Marie E, Ashikaga, Takamaru, Stockdale, Alan, Dana, Greg S, Naud, Shelly
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 03.06.2010; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adult; Attitude of Health Personnel; Cancer; Clinical Competence; Family Health; Female; Health risk assessment; Humans; Interviews as Topic; Male; Medical History Taking - statistics & numerical data; Medicine; Neoplasms - diagnosis; Neoplasms - prevention & control; New England; Physicians (General practice); Physicians, Family - statistics & numerical data; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data; Quality management; Research article; Risk Assessment; Risk factors; Surveys; Surveys and Questionnaires; New England; United States
• DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-45
• ISSN: 1471-2296

Family history (FH) assessment is useful in identifying and managing patients at increased risk for cancer. This study assessed reported FH quality and associations with physician perceptions. Primary care physicians practicing in two northeastern U.S. states were surveyed (n = 880; 70% response rate). Outcome measures of FH quality were extent of FH taken and ascertaining age at cancer diagnosis for affected family members. Predictors of quality measured in this survey included: perceived advantages and disadvantages of collecting FH information, knowledge of management options, access to supportive resources, and confidence in ability to interpret FH. Reported collection of information regarding second degree blood relatives and age of diagnosis among affected relatives was low. All hypothesized predictors were associated with measures of FH quality, but not all were consistent independent predictors. Perceived advantages of taking a family history, access to supportive resources, and confidence in ability to identify and manage higher risk patients were independent predictors of both FH quality measures. Perceived disadvantages of taking a family history was independently associated one measure of FH quality. Knowledge of management options was not independently associated with either quality measure. Modifiable perception and resource factors were independently associated with quality of FH taking in a large and diverse sample of primary care physicians. Improving FH quality for identification of high risk individuals will require multi-faceted interventions.