Development and preliminary psychometric properties of a well-being index for medical students

• Published in: BMC medical education Vol. 10; no. 1; p. 8
• Main Authors: Dyrbye, Liselotte N, Szydlo, Daniel W, Downing, Steven M, Sloan, Jeff A, Shanafelt, Tait D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 27.01.2010; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Demographic aspects; Health aspects; Humans; Medical students; Personal Satisfaction; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychological aspects; Psychological tests; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of Results; Stress (Psychology); Stress, Psychological - physiopathology; Stress, Psychological - psychology; Students, Medical - psychology
• DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-8
• ISSN: 1472-6920

Psychological distress is common among medical students but manifests in a variety of forms. Currently, no brief, practical tool exists to simultaneously evaluate these domains of distress among medical students. The authors describe the development of a subject-reported assessment (Medical Student Well-Being Index, MSWBI) intended to screen for medical student distress across a variety of domains and examine its preliminary psychometric properties. Relevant domains of distress were identified, items generated, and a screening instrument formed using a process of literature review, nominal group technique, input from deans and medical students, and correlation analysis from previously administered assessments. Eleven experts judged the clarity, relevance, and representativeness of the items. A Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated. Interrater agreement was assessed using pair-wise percent agreement adjusted for chance agreement. Data from 2248 medical students who completed the MSWBI along with validated full-length instruments assessing domains of interest was used to calculate reliability and explore internal structure validity. Burnout (emotional exhaustion and depersonalization), depression, mental quality of life (QOL), physical QOL, stress, and fatigue were domains identified for inclusion in the MSWBI. Six of 7 items received item CVI-relevance and CVI-representativeness of >or=0.82. Overall scale CVI-relevance and CVI-representativeness was 0.94 and 0.91. Overall pair-wise percent agreement between raters was >or=85% for clarity, relevance, and representativeness. Cronbach's alpha was 0.68. Item by item percent pair-wise agreements and Phi were low, suggesting little overlap between items. The majority of MSWBI items had a >or=74% sensitivity and specificity for detecting distress within the intended domain. The results of this study provide evidence of reliability and content-related validity of the MSWBI. Further research is needed to assess remaining psychometric properties and establish scores for which intervention is warranted.