Threshold intensity factors as lower boundaries for crack propagation in ceramics

Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to corrosion assisted stress at the crack tip or at any pre-existing defect in the ceramic. The combined effect of high stresses at the crack tip and th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiomedical engineering online Vol. 3; no. 1; p. 41
Main Authors Marx, Rudolf, Jungwirth, Franz, Walter, Per-Ole
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 17.11.2004
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1475-925X
1475-925X
DOI10.1186/1475-925X-3-41

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to corrosion assisted stress at the crack tip or at any pre-existing defect in the ceramic. The combined effect of high stresses at the crack tip and the presence of water or body fluid molecules (reducing surface energy at the crack tip) induces crack propagation, which eventually may result in fatigue. The presence of a threshold in the stress intensity factor, below which no crack propagation occurs, has been the subject of important research in the last years. The higher this threshold, the higher the reliability of the ceramic, and consequently the longer its lifetime. We utilize the Irwin K-field displacement relation to deduce crack tip stress intensity factors from the near crack tip profile. Cracks are initiated by indentation impressions. The threshold stress intensity factor is determined as the time limit of the tip stress intensity when the residual stresses have (nearly) disappeared. We determined the threshold stress intensity factors for most of the all ceramic materials presently important for dental restorations in Europe. Of special significance is the finding that alumina ceramic has a threshold limit nearly identical with that of zirconia. The intention of the present paper is to stress the point that the threshold stress intensity factor represents a more intrinsic property for a given ceramic material than the widely used toughness (bend strength or fracture toughness), which refers only to fast crack growth. Considering two ceramics with identical threshold limits, although with different critical stress intensity limits, means that both ceramics have identical starting points for slow crack growth. Fast catastrophic crack growth leading to spontaneous fatigue, however, is different. This growth starts later in those ceramic materials that have larger critical stress intensity factors.
AbstractList Abstract Background Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to corrosion assisted stress at the crack tip or at any pre-existing defect in the ceramic. The combined effect of high stresses at the crack tip and the presence of water or body fluid molecules (reducing surface energy at the crack tip) induces crack propagation, which eventually may result in fatigue. The presence of a threshold in the stress intensity factor, below which no crack propagation occurs, has been the subject of important research in the last years. The higher this threshold, the higher the reliability of the ceramic, and consequently the longer its lifetime. Methods We utilize the Irwin K-field displacement relation to deduce crack tip stress intensity factors from the near crack tip profile. Cracks are initiated by indentation impressions. The threshold stress intensity factor is determined as the time limit of the tip stress intensity when the residual stresses have (nearly) disappeared. Results We determined the threshold stress intensity factors for most of the all ceramic materials presently important for dental restorations in Europe. Of special significance is the finding that alumina ceramic has a threshold limit nearly identical with that of zirconia. Conclusion The intention of the present paper is to stress the point that the threshold stress intensity factor represents a more intrinsic property for a given ceramic material than the widely used toughness (bend strength or fracture toughness), which refers only to fast crack growth. Considering two ceramics with identical threshold limits, although with different critical stress intensity limits, means that both ceramics have identical starting points for slow crack growth. Fast catastrophic crack growth leading to spontaneous fatigue, however, is different. This growth starts later in those ceramic materials that have larger critical stress intensity factors.
BACKGROUND: Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to corrosion assisted stress at the crack tip or at any pre-existing defect in the ceramic. The combined effect of high stresses at the crack tip and the presence of water or body fluid molecules (reducing surface energy at the crack tip) induces crack propagation, which eventually may result in fatigue. The presence of a threshold in the stress intensity factor, below which no crack propagation occurs, has been the subject of important research in the last years. The higher this threshold, the higher the reliability of the ceramic, and consequently the longer its lifetime. METHODS: We utilize the Irwin K-field displacement relation to deduce crack tip stress intensity factors from the near crack tip profile. Cracks are initiated by indentation impressions. The threshold stress intensity factor is determined as the time limit of the tip stress intensity when the residual stresses have (nearly) disappeared. RESULTS: We determined the threshold stress intensity factors for most of the all ceramic materials presently important for dental restorations in Europe. Of special significance is the finding that alumina ceramic has a threshold limit nearly identical with that of zirconia. CONCLUSION: The intention of the present paper is to stress the point that the threshold stress intensity factor represents a more intrinsic property for a given ceramic material than the widely used toughness (bend strength or fracture toughness), which refers only to fast crack growth. Considering two ceramics with identical threshold limits, although with different critical stress intensity limits, means that both ceramics have identical starting points for slow crack growth. Fast catastrophic crack growth leading to spontaneous fatigue, however, is different. This growth starts later in those ceramic materials that have larger critical stress intensity factors.
Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to corrosion assisted stress at the crack tip or at any pre-existing defect in the ceramic. The combined effect of high stresses at the crack tip and the presence of water or body fluid molecules (reducing surface energy at the crack tip) induces crack propagation, which eventually may result in fatigue. The presence of a threshold in the stress intensity factor, below which no crack propagation occurs, has been the subject of important research in the last years. The higher this threshold, the higher the reliability of the ceramic, and consequently the longer its lifetime.BACKGROUNDSlow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to corrosion assisted stress at the crack tip or at any pre-existing defect in the ceramic. The combined effect of high stresses at the crack tip and the presence of water or body fluid molecules (reducing surface energy at the crack tip) induces crack propagation, which eventually may result in fatigue. The presence of a threshold in the stress intensity factor, below which no crack propagation occurs, has been the subject of important research in the last years. The higher this threshold, the higher the reliability of the ceramic, and consequently the longer its lifetime.We utilize the Irwin K-field displacement relation to deduce crack tip stress intensity factors from the near crack tip profile. Cracks are initiated by indentation impressions. The threshold stress intensity factor is determined as the time limit of the tip stress intensity when the residual stresses have (nearly) disappeared.METHODSWe utilize the Irwin K-field displacement relation to deduce crack tip stress intensity factors from the near crack tip profile. Cracks are initiated by indentation impressions. The threshold stress intensity factor is determined as the time limit of the tip stress intensity when the residual stresses have (nearly) disappeared.We determined the threshold stress intensity factors for most of the all ceramic materials presently important for dental restorations in Europe. Of special significance is the finding that alumina ceramic has a threshold limit nearly identical with that of zirconia.RESULTSWe determined the threshold stress intensity factors for most of the all ceramic materials presently important for dental restorations in Europe. Of special significance is the finding that alumina ceramic has a threshold limit nearly identical with that of zirconia.The intention of the present paper is to stress the point that the threshold stress intensity factor represents a more intrinsic property for a given ceramic material than the widely used toughness (bend strength or fracture toughness), which refers only to fast crack growth. Considering two ceramics with identical threshold limits, although with different critical stress intensity limits, means that both ceramics have identical starting points for slow crack growth. Fast catastrophic crack growth leading to spontaneous fatigue, however, is different. This growth starts later in those ceramic materials that have larger critical stress intensity factors.CONCLUSIONThe intention of the present paper is to stress the point that the threshold stress intensity factor represents a more intrinsic property for a given ceramic material than the widely used toughness (bend strength or fracture toughness), which refers only to fast crack growth. Considering two ceramics with identical threshold limits, although with different critical stress intensity limits, means that both ceramics have identical starting points for slow crack growth. Fast catastrophic crack growth leading to spontaneous fatigue, however, is different. This growth starts later in those ceramic materials that have larger critical stress intensity factors.
Background Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus K sub(I )(stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to corrosion assisted stress at the crack tip or at any pre-existing defect in the ceramic. The combined effect of high stresses at the crack tip and the presence of water or body fluid molecules (reducing surface energy at the crack tip) induces crack propagation, which eventually may result in fatigue. The presence of a threshold in the stress intensity factor, below which no crack propagation occurs, has been the subject of important research in the last years. The higher this threshold, the higher the reliability of the ceramic, and consequently the longer its lifetime. Methods We utilize the Irwin K-field displacement relation to deduce crack tip stress intensity factors from the near crack tip profile. Cracks are initiated by indentation impressions. The threshold stress intensity factor is determined as the time limit of the tip stress intensity when the residual stresses have (nearly) disappeared. Results We determined the threshold stress intensity factors for most of the all ceramic materials presently important for dental restorations in Europe. Of special significance is the finding that alumina ceramic has a threshold limit nearly identical with that of zirconia. Conclusion The intention of the present paper is to stress the point that the threshold stress intensity factor represents a more intrinsic property for a given ceramic material than the widely used toughness (bend strength or fracture toughness), which refers only to fast crack growth. Considering two ceramics with identical threshold limits, although with different critical stress intensity limits, means that both ceramics have identical starting points for slow crack growth. Fast catastrophic crack growth leading to spontaneous fatigue, however, is different. This growth starts later in those ceramic materials that have larger critical stress intensity factors.
Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to corrosion assisted stress at the crack tip or at any pre-existing defect in the ceramic. The combined effect of high stresses at the crack tip and the presence of water or body fluid molecules (reducing surface energy at the crack tip) induces crack propagation, which eventually may result in fatigue. The presence of a threshold in the stress intensity factor, below which no crack propagation occurs, has been the subject of important research in the last years. The higher this threshold, the higher the reliability of the ceramic, and consequently the longer its lifetime. We utilize the Irwin K-field displacement relation to deduce crack tip stress intensity factors from the near crack tip profile. Cracks are initiated by indentation impressions. The threshold stress intensity factor is determined as the time limit of the tip stress intensity when the residual stresses have (nearly) disappeared. We determined the threshold stress intensity factors for most of the all ceramic materials presently important for dental restorations in Europe. Of special significance is the finding that alumina ceramic has a threshold limit nearly identical with that of zirconia. The intention of the present paper is to stress the point that the threshold stress intensity factor represents a more intrinsic property for a given ceramic material than the widely used toughness (bend strength or fracture toughness), which refers only to fast crack growth. Considering two ceramics with identical threshold limits, although with different critical stress intensity limits, means that both ceramics have identical starting points for slow crack growth. Fast catastrophic crack growth leading to spontaneous fatigue, however, is different. This growth starts later in those ceramic materials that have larger critical stress intensity factors.
ArticleNumber 41
Author Jungwirth, Franz
Marx, Rudolf
Walter, Per-Ole
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Section of Dental Materials, University Hospital of the University of Technology, 52074 Aachen, Germany
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Section of Dental Materials, University Hospital of the University of Technology, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Rudolf
  surname: Marx
  fullname: Marx, Rudolf
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Franz
  surname: Jungwirth
  fullname: Jungwirth, Franz
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Per-Ole
  surname: Walter
  fullname: Walter, Per-Ole
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15548323$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFUk1v1DAQtVAr-gFXjsgnbinxt33gUFV8VKqEKhWJmzVxnF2XxF7sbFH_PcluKd1WhZNHM--9mfG8I7QXU_QIvSH1CSFavidcicpQ8b1iFScv0OF9Yu9BfICOSrmua1rX0rxEB0QIrhllh-jyapl9Waa-xSGOPpYw3uIO3JhywVBwn375jJu0ji3k4AvuUsYug_uBVzmtYAFjSHHiYuczDMGVV2i_g77413fvMfr26ePV2Zfq4uvn87PTi6oRio2V4kQzaMHIrpGealBUATfAmSFaaOBT1ChJpJbMeM1kQ6VT2slOOBBcsmN0vtVtE1zbVQ4D5FubINhNIuWFhTwG13urhaLAO9GSjnNJuSYAiklNFG-Z0WzS-rDVWq2bwbfOxzFDvyO6W4lhaRfpxgpmqNYT_3TLb0J6hr9bcWmw83XsfB3LLCeTxru7GXL6ufZltEMozvc9RJ_WxUpFDGWbZv8GUjLDJPsvkJjpJ6iZW799uP793H9sMgFOtgCXUynZd38htZ19-HQZ_ojgwrixyrR-6J-j_QZO9uEQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2010_00640_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0757_2007_00243_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jeurceramsoc_2016_11_003
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1752_248X_2008_00029_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmst_2021_08_006
crossref_primary_10_14368_jdras_2022_38_3_138
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nocx_2022_100134
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0501_2010_01954_x
crossref_primary_10_2341_06_70
crossref_primary_10_3390_ma17143518
crossref_primary_10_3390_met8050313
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2017_09_006
crossref_primary_10_1520_JTE20180579
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2842_2005_01571_x
crossref_primary_10_1080_00016350600856232
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10856_008_3667_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10704_010_9535_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_13_60377_7
crossref_primary_10_3233_BME_211307
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2005_07_009
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2842_2006_01705_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10856_007_3290_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jeurceramsoc_2021_09_038
Cites_doi 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00698.x
10.1016/0955-2219(90)90053-I
10.1063/1.342902
10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04889.x
10.1007/BF00550196
10.1007/BF01144735
10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb01058.x
10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00072-9
10.1016/0955-2219(95)00048-Y
10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03726.x
10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02848.x
10.1002/jbm.820270605
10.1016/0955-2219(95)00176-X
10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08905.x
10.1007/978-3-642-58407-7
10.1016/1359-6454(95)00199-9
10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00206-X
10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01906.x
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199702)34:2<149::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-Q
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2004 Marx et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004 Marx et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2004 Marx et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004 Marx et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
8FD
FR3
P64
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/1475-925X-3-41
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE - Academic
Engineering Research Database
Engineering Research Database
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Engineering
EISSN 1475-925X
EndPage 41
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_8572a4f5d1f4462481aa7368174d3983
PMC539288
oai_biomedcentral_com_1475_925X_3_41
15548323
10_1186_1475_925X_3_41
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2VQ
2WC
4.4
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
6PF
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADMLS
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BFQNJ
BMC
C1A
C6C
CITATION
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FRP
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
H13
HYE
I-F
IAO
IGS
IHR
INH
INR
IPNFZ
ISR
ITC
KQ8
M48
MK~
ML~
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
RBZ
RIG
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SEG
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
-A0
ACRMQ
ADINQ
C24
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
8FD
FR3
P64
7X8
ABVAZ
AFGXO
AFNRJ
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-b573t-74183ada96fb6e28a727a49a4391858a4a43b76168639e836b26c78c6f5ca5463
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1475-925X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:27:05 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:02:17 EDT 2025
Wed May 22 07:12:21 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 04 19:27:16 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 04:14:46 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 17:06:49 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:37:53 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:04:34 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:34:32 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b573t-74183ada96fb6e28a727a49a4391858a4a43b76168639e836b26c78c6f5ca5463
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/1475-925X-3-41
PMID 15548323
PQID 19481291
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8572a4f5d1f4462481aa7368174d3983
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_539288
biomedcentral_primary_oai_biomedcentral_com_1475_925X_3_41
proquest_miscellaneous_67192388
proquest_miscellaneous_21238863
proquest_miscellaneous_19481291
pubmed_primary_15548323
crossref_primary_10_1186_1475_925X_3_41
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_1475_925X_3_41
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2004-11-17
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2004-11-17
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2004
  text: 2004-11-17
  day: 17
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle Biomedical engineering online
PublicationTitleAlternate Biomed Eng Online
PublicationYear 2004
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References VM Sglavo (68_CR13) 1999; 82
YW Rhee (68_CR17) 2001; 84
D Munz (68_CR16) 1999
JM Drouin (68_CR5) 1997; 34
RF Cook (68_CR3) 1989; 65
VM Sglavo (68_CR9) 1995; 15
RH Dauskardt (68_CR19) 1987; 70
AG Evans (68_CR10) 1972; 7
B Lawn (68_CR1) 1991
VM Sglavo (68_CR8) 1996; 16
J Salomonson (68_CR11) 1996; 44
K Shimizu (68_CR20) 1993; 27
RF Cook (68_CR12) 1993; 76
A Krell (68_CR7) 2003; 23
PF Becher (68_CR21) 1986; 21
R Marx (68_CR22) 2001; 56
J Fischer (68_CR23) 1989; 44
J Seidel (68_CR14) 1997; 80
C Kocer (68_CR6) 2001; 84
KT Wan (68_CR2) 1990; 6
J Chevalier (68_CR18) 1995; 78
GR Irwin (68_CR15) 1958
AH De Aza (68_CR4) 2002; 23
8408102 - J Biomed Mater Res. 1993 Jun;27(6):729-34
11774853 - Biomaterials. 2002 Feb;23(3):937-45
2639004 - Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1989 Nov;44(11):891-3
9029293 - J Biomed Mater Res. 1997 Feb;34(2):149-55
References_xml – volume: 84
  start-page: 561
  year: 2001
  ident: 68_CR17
  publication-title: J Am Ceram Soc
  doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00698.x
– volume: 6
  start-page: 259
  year: 1990
  ident: 68_CR2
  publication-title: J Eur Ceram Soc
  doi: 10.1016/0955-2219(90)90053-I
– volume: 44
  start-page: 891
  year: 1989
  ident: 68_CR23
  publication-title: Dtsch Zahnärztl Z
– volume-title: Fracture of brittle solids
  year: 1991
  ident: 68_CR1
– volume: 65
  start-page: 1902
  year: 1989
  ident: 68_CR3
  publication-title: J Appl Phys
  doi: 10.1063/1.342902
– volume: 70
  start-page: C-248
  year: 1987
  ident: 68_CR19
  publication-title: J Am Ceram Soc
  doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04889.x
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1137
  year: 1972
  ident: 68_CR10
  publication-title: J of material science
  doi: 10.1007/BF00550196
– volume: 21
  start-page: 297
  year: 1986
  ident: 68_CR21
  publication-title: J of Mat Science
  doi: 10.1007/BF01144735
– volume: 84
  start-page: 2585
  year: 2001
  ident: 68_CR6
  publication-title: J Am Ceram Soc
  doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb01058.x
– volume: 23
  start-page: 81
  year: 2003
  ident: 68_CR7
  publication-title: J Eur Ceram Soc
  doi: 10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00072-9
– volume: 15
  start-page: 777
  year: 1995
  ident: 68_CR9
  publication-title: J Eur Ceram Soc
  doi: 10.1016/0955-2219(95)00048-Y
– volume: 76
  start-page: 1096
  year: 1993
  ident: 68_CR12
  publication-title: J Am Ceram Soc
  doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03726.x
– volume: 80
  start-page: 433
  year: 1997
  ident: 68_CR14
  publication-title: J Am Ceram Soc
  doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02848.x
– volume: 27
  start-page: 729
  year: 1993
  ident: 68_CR20
  publication-title: J Biomed Mater Res
  doi: 10.1002/jbm.820270605
– volume: 16
  start-page: 645
  year: 1996
  ident: 68_CR8
  publication-title: J Eur Ceram Soc
  doi: 10.1016/0955-2219(95)00176-X
– volume: 78
  start-page: 1889
  year: 1995
  ident: 68_CR18
  publication-title: J Am Ceram Soc
  doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08905.x
– volume-title: Ceramics – Mechanical Properties, Failure Behaviour, Materials Selection
  year: 1999
  ident: 68_CR16
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-58407-7
– volume: 44
  start-page: 543
  year: 1996
  ident: 68_CR11
  publication-title: Acta mater
  doi: 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00199-9
– volume: 23
  start-page: 937
  year: 2002
  ident: 68_CR4
  publication-title: Biomaterials
  doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00206-X
– volume: 82
  start-page: 1269
  year: 1999
  ident: 68_CR13
  publication-title: J Am Ceram Soc
  doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01906.x
– volume: 56
  start-page: 90
  year: 2001
  ident: 68_CR22
  publication-title: Dtsch Zahnärztl Z
– volume: 34
  start-page: 149
  year: 1997
  ident: 68_CR5
  publication-title: J Biomed Mater Research
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199702)34:2<149::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-Q
– volume-title: In Handbuch der Physik
  year: 1958
  ident: 68_CR15
– reference: 2639004 - Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1989 Nov;44(11):891-3
– reference: 9029293 - J Biomed Mater Res. 1997 Feb;34(2):149-55
– reference: 8408102 - J Biomed Mater Res. 1993 Jun;27(6):729-34
– reference: 11774853 - Biomaterials. 2002 Feb;23(3):937-45
SSID ssj0020069
Score 1.8052727
Snippet Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to...
Background Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus K sub(I )(stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is...
BACKGROUND: Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed...
Abstract Background Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
biomedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 41
SubjectTerms Ceramics
Dental Materials - chemistry
Equipment Failure Analysis - methods
Humidity
Materials Testing - methods
Stress, Mechanical
Surface Properties
Zirconium - chemistry
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3PaxwhFJaQQ0gOJUl_bdq0Hgo9SVZn1GdvbUkIhRQKCexN1HVI6DIJu5tD_vu858ymO22XXnob9Mn4fE_9Hur3GPsQggGVMVJNuPCJOkEjYkyGrv0BelgKytBD4Yvv5vyq_jbRk7VUX3QnrKMH7gbuBLRVoW70VDYYuagaZAi2MoBIelo5KDyfYzdeBVN9qEUEvOVdkdXCKT3p6RolmJOnMlEJygM_eOc-G2xPhcX_b9Dz9xuUa1vS2T571mNJ_rnT4YBt5faQ7a0xDB6ynYv-7Pw5-3GJZlvQaRO_6e6tLx94n26HhwWfUb40HkuaJYqfOcJZnuYh_eTYM1x3ig2xLU95TlnsFy_Y1dnp5ddz0SdUEFHbaimIqaYK0-BME01WEBC8hNoFen0LGkKNX9EaaQBxS4bKRGWShWQanQLx5r9k2-1tm18z7kyOaBUZK7SLklMYB6tdk9M4Six3I_ZpMK7-riPP8ERnPazBmeXJKJ6M4itfyxETKyP41FOVU8aMmS8hC5g_5D8-ya_-s0nyC9l00JtSgC7ne5fz_3K5EXu_8giPk5FOWEKbb-8XXhL3jXJyswQhBcDh3SxhLIFugBF71fnYL5UQ-uECjG3NwPsG2gxr2pvrQhmuEQYDHP0P7d-w3Y7sUgpp37Lt5fw-HyMwW8Z3ZQ4-AvdTM9Q
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Threshold intensity factors as lower boundaries for crack propagation in ceramics
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15548323
https://www.proquest.com/docview/19481291
https://www.proquest.com/docview/21238863
https://www.proquest.com/docview/67192388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-3-41
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC539288
https://doaj.org/article/8572a4f5d1f4462481aa7368174d3983
Volume 3
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3daxQxEA9SQfRBtH6tHzUPgk_RZvOxs4KIiqUIJwg9uLeQ5LK2eOzp7RXsf-9Mdq_t2t6Lb8fuhNtkZja_2SS_H2OvvLdQJqxUI774hI7QiBCipW1_gBEWfWnpoPDkmz2c6q8zM7vY_zQMYHdtaUd6UtPV4s2f32cfMOHf54QH-1bqyoi6NDOhBJ1hv4mzkqVCbKLPVxSocq4H0sarbbI4D2J3RapFo4Pvi9F8lWn9r8Oi_26pvDRHHdxjdwdwyT_20XCf3UjtLrtziXJwl92aDIvpD9j3I_RjR8tP_KTfyL4-44P-DvcdX5CAGg9Zd4kKao74lseVjz85Phm-iLJTsS2PaUWy9t1DNj34cvT5UAwKCyKYSq0FUdcoP_e1bYJNJXhEM17Xno7jggGv8VeorLSAQCaBsqG0sYJoGxM9Eek_Yjvtsk1PGK9tCroxMijZ6FLOYd9Xpm5S3A8Sr9cFezcaV_erZ9NwxG89voOp5sg_jvzjlNOyYGLjBBcH7nKS0Fi4XMOAvWL_-tx-8z_bLD-RT0dPky8sVz_ckLwOTFV67MQcu6ZtqUF6XykLWM3NVQ2qYC83EeEwO2nJxbdpedo5SWQ4ZS23WxB0ABze7Ra2IhQOULDHfYxddGmI2YLZUfSNejO-054cZw5xg7gY4On_NnzGbveMl1LI6jnbWa9O0wtEZ-uwl79q7OXk-wtBnTti
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Threshold+intensity+factors+as+lower+boundaries+for+crack+propagation+in+ceramics&rft.jtitle=Biomedical+engineering+online&rft.au=Marx%2C+Rudolf&rft.au=Jungwirth%2C+Franz&rft.au=Walter%2C+Per-Ole&rft.date=2004-11-17&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1475-925X&rft.volume=3&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=41&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1475-925X-3-41&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F15548323&rft.externalDocID=PMC539288
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1475-925X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1475-925X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1475-925X&client=summon