Threshold intensity factors as lower boundaries for crack propagation in ceramics
Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to corrosion assisted stress at the crack tip or at any pre-existing defect in the ceramic. The combined effect of high stresses at the crack tip and th...
Saved in:
Published in | Biomedical engineering online Vol. 3; no. 1; p. 41 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
17.11.2004
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1475-925X 1475-925X |
DOI | 10.1186/1475-925X-3-41 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to corrosion assisted stress at the crack tip or at any pre-existing defect in the ceramic. The combined effect of high stresses at the crack tip and the presence of water or body fluid molecules (reducing surface energy at the crack tip) induces crack propagation, which eventually may result in fatigue. The presence of a threshold in the stress intensity factor, below which no crack propagation occurs, has been the subject of important research in the last years. The higher this threshold, the higher the reliability of the ceramic, and consequently the longer its lifetime.
We utilize the Irwin K-field displacement relation to deduce crack tip stress intensity factors from the near crack tip profile. Cracks are initiated by indentation impressions. The threshold stress intensity factor is determined as the time limit of the tip stress intensity when the residual stresses have (nearly) disappeared.
We determined the threshold stress intensity factors for most of the all ceramic materials presently important for dental restorations in Europe. Of special significance is the finding that alumina ceramic has a threshold limit nearly identical with that of zirconia.
The intention of the present paper is to stress the point that the threshold stress intensity factor represents a more intrinsic property for a given ceramic material than the widely used toughness (bend strength or fracture toughness), which refers only to fast crack growth. Considering two ceramics with identical threshold limits, although with different critical stress intensity limits, means that both ceramics have identical starting points for slow crack growth. Fast catastrophic crack growth leading to spontaneous fatigue, however, is different. This growth starts later in those ceramic materials that have larger critical stress intensity factors. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract Background Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to corrosion assisted stress at the crack tip or at any pre-existing defect in the ceramic. The combined effect of high stresses at the crack tip and the presence of water or body fluid molecules (reducing surface energy at the crack tip) induces crack propagation, which eventually may result in fatigue. The presence of a threshold in the stress intensity factor, below which no crack propagation occurs, has been the subject of important research in the last years. The higher this threshold, the higher the reliability of the ceramic, and consequently the longer its lifetime. Methods We utilize the Irwin K-field displacement relation to deduce crack tip stress intensity factors from the near crack tip profile. Cracks are initiated by indentation impressions. The threshold stress intensity factor is determined as the time limit of the tip stress intensity when the residual stresses have (nearly) disappeared. Results We determined the threshold stress intensity factors for most of the all ceramic materials presently important for dental restorations in Europe. Of special significance is the finding that alumina ceramic has a threshold limit nearly identical with that of zirconia. Conclusion The intention of the present paper is to stress the point that the threshold stress intensity factor represents a more intrinsic property for a given ceramic material than the widely used toughness (bend strength or fracture toughness), which refers only to fast crack growth. Considering two ceramics with identical threshold limits, although with different critical stress intensity limits, means that both ceramics have identical starting points for slow crack growth. Fast catastrophic crack growth leading to spontaneous fatigue, however, is different. This growth starts later in those ceramic materials that have larger critical stress intensity factors. BACKGROUND: Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to corrosion assisted stress at the crack tip or at any pre-existing defect in the ceramic. The combined effect of high stresses at the crack tip and the presence of water or body fluid molecules (reducing surface energy at the crack tip) induces crack propagation, which eventually may result in fatigue. The presence of a threshold in the stress intensity factor, below which no crack propagation occurs, has been the subject of important research in the last years. The higher this threshold, the higher the reliability of the ceramic, and consequently the longer its lifetime. METHODS: We utilize the Irwin K-field displacement relation to deduce crack tip stress intensity factors from the near crack tip profile. Cracks are initiated by indentation impressions. The threshold stress intensity factor is determined as the time limit of the tip stress intensity when the residual stresses have (nearly) disappeared. RESULTS: We determined the threshold stress intensity factors for most of the all ceramic materials presently important for dental restorations in Europe. Of special significance is the finding that alumina ceramic has a threshold limit nearly identical with that of zirconia. CONCLUSION: The intention of the present paper is to stress the point that the threshold stress intensity factor represents a more intrinsic property for a given ceramic material than the widely used toughness (bend strength or fracture toughness), which refers only to fast crack growth. Considering two ceramics with identical threshold limits, although with different critical stress intensity limits, means that both ceramics have identical starting points for slow crack growth. Fast catastrophic crack growth leading to spontaneous fatigue, however, is different. This growth starts later in those ceramic materials that have larger critical stress intensity factors. Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to corrosion assisted stress at the crack tip or at any pre-existing defect in the ceramic. The combined effect of high stresses at the crack tip and the presence of water or body fluid molecules (reducing surface energy at the crack tip) induces crack propagation, which eventually may result in fatigue. The presence of a threshold in the stress intensity factor, below which no crack propagation occurs, has been the subject of important research in the last years. The higher this threshold, the higher the reliability of the ceramic, and consequently the longer its lifetime.BACKGROUNDSlow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to corrosion assisted stress at the crack tip or at any pre-existing defect in the ceramic. The combined effect of high stresses at the crack tip and the presence of water or body fluid molecules (reducing surface energy at the crack tip) induces crack propagation, which eventually may result in fatigue. The presence of a threshold in the stress intensity factor, below which no crack propagation occurs, has been the subject of important research in the last years. The higher this threshold, the higher the reliability of the ceramic, and consequently the longer its lifetime.We utilize the Irwin K-field displacement relation to deduce crack tip stress intensity factors from the near crack tip profile. Cracks are initiated by indentation impressions. The threshold stress intensity factor is determined as the time limit of the tip stress intensity when the residual stresses have (nearly) disappeared.METHODSWe utilize the Irwin K-field displacement relation to deduce crack tip stress intensity factors from the near crack tip profile. Cracks are initiated by indentation impressions. The threshold stress intensity factor is determined as the time limit of the tip stress intensity when the residual stresses have (nearly) disappeared.We determined the threshold stress intensity factors for most of the all ceramic materials presently important for dental restorations in Europe. Of special significance is the finding that alumina ceramic has a threshold limit nearly identical with that of zirconia.RESULTSWe determined the threshold stress intensity factors for most of the all ceramic materials presently important for dental restorations in Europe. Of special significance is the finding that alumina ceramic has a threshold limit nearly identical with that of zirconia.The intention of the present paper is to stress the point that the threshold stress intensity factor represents a more intrinsic property for a given ceramic material than the widely used toughness (bend strength or fracture toughness), which refers only to fast crack growth. Considering two ceramics with identical threshold limits, although with different critical stress intensity limits, means that both ceramics have identical starting points for slow crack growth. Fast catastrophic crack growth leading to spontaneous fatigue, however, is different. This growth starts later in those ceramic materials that have larger critical stress intensity factors.CONCLUSIONThe intention of the present paper is to stress the point that the threshold stress intensity factor represents a more intrinsic property for a given ceramic material than the widely used toughness (bend strength or fracture toughness), which refers only to fast crack growth. Considering two ceramics with identical threshold limits, although with different critical stress intensity limits, means that both ceramics have identical starting points for slow crack growth. Fast catastrophic crack growth leading to spontaneous fatigue, however, is different. This growth starts later in those ceramic materials that have larger critical stress intensity factors. Background Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus K sub(I )(stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to corrosion assisted stress at the crack tip or at any pre-existing defect in the ceramic. The combined effect of high stresses at the crack tip and the presence of water or body fluid molecules (reducing surface energy at the crack tip) induces crack propagation, which eventually may result in fatigue. The presence of a threshold in the stress intensity factor, below which no crack propagation occurs, has been the subject of important research in the last years. The higher this threshold, the higher the reliability of the ceramic, and consequently the longer its lifetime. Methods We utilize the Irwin K-field displacement relation to deduce crack tip stress intensity factors from the near crack tip profile. Cracks are initiated by indentation impressions. The threshold stress intensity factor is determined as the time limit of the tip stress intensity when the residual stresses have (nearly) disappeared. Results We determined the threshold stress intensity factors for most of the all ceramic materials presently important for dental restorations in Europe. Of special significance is the finding that alumina ceramic has a threshold limit nearly identical with that of zirconia. Conclusion The intention of the present paper is to stress the point that the threshold stress intensity factor represents a more intrinsic property for a given ceramic material than the widely used toughness (bend strength or fracture toughness), which refers only to fast crack growth. Considering two ceramics with identical threshold limits, although with different critical stress intensity limits, means that both ceramics have identical starting points for slow crack growth. Fast catastrophic crack growth leading to spontaneous fatigue, however, is different. This growth starts later in those ceramic materials that have larger critical stress intensity factors. Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to corrosion assisted stress at the crack tip or at any pre-existing defect in the ceramic. The combined effect of high stresses at the crack tip and the presence of water or body fluid molecules (reducing surface energy at the crack tip) induces crack propagation, which eventually may result in fatigue. The presence of a threshold in the stress intensity factor, below which no crack propagation occurs, has been the subject of important research in the last years. The higher this threshold, the higher the reliability of the ceramic, and consequently the longer its lifetime. We utilize the Irwin K-field displacement relation to deduce crack tip stress intensity factors from the near crack tip profile. Cracks are initiated by indentation impressions. The threshold stress intensity factor is determined as the time limit of the tip stress intensity when the residual stresses have (nearly) disappeared. We determined the threshold stress intensity factors for most of the all ceramic materials presently important for dental restorations in Europe. Of special significance is the finding that alumina ceramic has a threshold limit nearly identical with that of zirconia. The intention of the present paper is to stress the point that the threshold stress intensity factor represents a more intrinsic property for a given ceramic material than the widely used toughness (bend strength or fracture toughness), which refers only to fast crack growth. Considering two ceramics with identical threshold limits, although with different critical stress intensity limits, means that both ceramics have identical starting points for slow crack growth. Fast catastrophic crack growth leading to spontaneous fatigue, however, is different. This growth starts later in those ceramic materials that have larger critical stress intensity factors. |
ArticleNumber | 41 |
Author | Jungwirth, Franz Marx, Rudolf Walter, Per-Ole |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Section of Dental Materials, University Hospital of the University of Technology, 52074 Aachen, Germany |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Section of Dental Materials, University Hospital of the University of Technology, 52074 Aachen, Germany |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Rudolf surname: Marx fullname: Marx, Rudolf – sequence: 2 givenname: Franz surname: Jungwirth fullname: Jungwirth, Franz – sequence: 3 givenname: Per-Ole surname: Walter fullname: Walter, Per-Ole |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15548323$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFUk1v1DAQtVAr-gFXjsgnbinxt33gUFV8VKqEKhWJmzVxnF2XxF7sbFH_PcluKd1WhZNHM--9mfG8I7QXU_QIvSH1CSFavidcicpQ8b1iFScv0OF9Yu9BfICOSrmua1rX0rxEB0QIrhllh-jyapl9Waa-xSGOPpYw3uIO3JhywVBwn375jJu0ji3k4AvuUsYug_uBVzmtYAFjSHHiYuczDMGVV2i_g77413fvMfr26ePV2Zfq4uvn87PTi6oRio2V4kQzaMHIrpGealBUATfAmSFaaOBT1ChJpJbMeM1kQ6VT2slOOBBcsmN0vtVtE1zbVQ4D5FubINhNIuWFhTwG13urhaLAO9GSjnNJuSYAiklNFG-Z0WzS-rDVWq2bwbfOxzFDvyO6W4lhaRfpxgpmqNYT_3TLb0J6hr9bcWmw83XsfB3LLCeTxru7GXL6ufZltEMozvc9RJ_WxUpFDGWbZv8GUjLDJPsvkJjpJ6iZW799uP793H9sMgFOtgCXUynZd38htZ19-HQZ_ojgwrixyrR-6J-j_QZO9uEQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2010_00640_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0757_2007_00243_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jeurceramsoc_2016_11_003 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1752_248X_2008_00029_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmst_2021_08_006 crossref_primary_10_14368_jdras_2022_38_3_138 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nocx_2022_100134 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0501_2010_01954_x crossref_primary_10_2341_06_70 crossref_primary_10_3390_ma17143518 crossref_primary_10_3390_met8050313 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2017_09_006 crossref_primary_10_1520_JTE20180579 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2842_2005_01571_x crossref_primary_10_1080_00016350600856232 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10856_008_3667_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s10704_010_9535_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_13_60377_7 crossref_primary_10_3233_BME_211307 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2005_07_009 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2842_2006_01705_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10856_007_3290_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jeurceramsoc_2021_09_038 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00698.x 10.1016/0955-2219(90)90053-I 10.1063/1.342902 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04889.x 10.1007/BF00550196 10.1007/BF01144735 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb01058.x 10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00072-9 10.1016/0955-2219(95)00048-Y 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03726.x 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02848.x 10.1002/jbm.820270605 10.1016/0955-2219(95)00176-X 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08905.x 10.1007/978-3-642-58407-7 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00199-9 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00206-X 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01906.x 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199702)34:2<149::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-Q |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2004 Marx et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004 Marx et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2004 Marx et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004 Marx et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QO 8FD FR3 P64 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/1475-925X-3-41 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Engineering Research Database Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Engineering Research Database Engineering Research Database MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Engineering |
EISSN | 1475-925X |
EndPage | 41 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_8572a4f5d1f4462481aa7368174d3983 PMC539288 oai_biomedcentral_com_1475_925X_3_41 15548323 10_1186_1475_925X_3_41 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2VQ 2WC 4.4 53G 5GY 5VS 6J9 6PF AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADMLS ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BFQNJ BMC C1A C6C CITATION CS3 DIK E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FRP GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HYE I-F IAO IGS IHR INH INR IPNFZ ISR ITC KQ8 M48 MK~ ML~ M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT RBZ RIG RNS ROL RPM RSV SEG SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS W2D WOQ WOW XSB -A0 ACRMQ ADINQ C24 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QO 8FD FR3 P64 7X8 ABVAZ AFGXO AFNRJ 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-b573t-74183ada96fb6e28a727a49a4391858a4a43b76168639e836b26c78c6f5ca5463 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1475-925X |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:27:05 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:02:17 EDT 2025 Wed May 22 07:12:21 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 04 19:27:16 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 04:14:46 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 17:06:49 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:37:53 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:04:34 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:34:32 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b573t-74183ada96fb6e28a727a49a4391858a4a43b76168639e836b26c78c6f5ca5463 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/1475-925X-3-41 |
PMID | 15548323 |
PQID | 19481291 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8572a4f5d1f4462481aa7368174d3983 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_539288 biomedcentral_primary_oai_biomedcentral_com_1475_925X_3_41 proquest_miscellaneous_67192388 proquest_miscellaneous_21238863 proquest_miscellaneous_19481291 pubmed_primary_15548323 crossref_primary_10_1186_1475_925X_3_41 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_1475_925X_3_41 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2004-11-17 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2004-11-17 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2004 text: 2004-11-17 day: 17 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Biomedical engineering online |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Biomed Eng Online |
PublicationYear | 2004 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | VM Sglavo (68_CR13) 1999; 82 YW Rhee (68_CR17) 2001; 84 D Munz (68_CR16) 1999 JM Drouin (68_CR5) 1997; 34 RF Cook (68_CR3) 1989; 65 VM Sglavo (68_CR9) 1995; 15 RH Dauskardt (68_CR19) 1987; 70 AG Evans (68_CR10) 1972; 7 B Lawn (68_CR1) 1991 VM Sglavo (68_CR8) 1996; 16 J Salomonson (68_CR11) 1996; 44 K Shimizu (68_CR20) 1993; 27 RF Cook (68_CR12) 1993; 76 A Krell (68_CR7) 2003; 23 PF Becher (68_CR21) 1986; 21 R Marx (68_CR22) 2001; 56 J Fischer (68_CR23) 1989; 44 J Seidel (68_CR14) 1997; 80 C Kocer (68_CR6) 2001; 84 KT Wan (68_CR2) 1990; 6 J Chevalier (68_CR18) 1995; 78 GR Irwin (68_CR15) 1958 AH De Aza (68_CR4) 2002; 23 8408102 - J Biomed Mater Res. 1993 Jun;27(6):729-34 11774853 - Biomaterials. 2002 Feb;23(3):937-45 2639004 - Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1989 Nov;44(11):891-3 9029293 - J Biomed Mater Res. 1997 Feb;34(2):149-55 |
References_xml | – volume: 84 start-page: 561 year: 2001 ident: 68_CR17 publication-title: J Am Ceram Soc doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00698.x – volume: 6 start-page: 259 year: 1990 ident: 68_CR2 publication-title: J Eur Ceram Soc doi: 10.1016/0955-2219(90)90053-I – volume: 44 start-page: 891 year: 1989 ident: 68_CR23 publication-title: Dtsch Zahnärztl Z – volume-title: Fracture of brittle solids year: 1991 ident: 68_CR1 – volume: 65 start-page: 1902 year: 1989 ident: 68_CR3 publication-title: J Appl Phys doi: 10.1063/1.342902 – volume: 70 start-page: C-248 year: 1987 ident: 68_CR19 publication-title: J Am Ceram Soc doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04889.x – volume: 7 start-page: 1137 year: 1972 ident: 68_CR10 publication-title: J of material science doi: 10.1007/BF00550196 – volume: 21 start-page: 297 year: 1986 ident: 68_CR21 publication-title: J of Mat Science doi: 10.1007/BF01144735 – volume: 84 start-page: 2585 year: 2001 ident: 68_CR6 publication-title: J Am Ceram Soc doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb01058.x – volume: 23 start-page: 81 year: 2003 ident: 68_CR7 publication-title: J Eur Ceram Soc doi: 10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00072-9 – volume: 15 start-page: 777 year: 1995 ident: 68_CR9 publication-title: J Eur Ceram Soc doi: 10.1016/0955-2219(95)00048-Y – volume: 76 start-page: 1096 year: 1993 ident: 68_CR12 publication-title: J Am Ceram Soc doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03726.x – volume: 80 start-page: 433 year: 1997 ident: 68_CR14 publication-title: J Am Ceram Soc doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02848.x – volume: 27 start-page: 729 year: 1993 ident: 68_CR20 publication-title: J Biomed Mater Res doi: 10.1002/jbm.820270605 – volume: 16 start-page: 645 year: 1996 ident: 68_CR8 publication-title: J Eur Ceram Soc doi: 10.1016/0955-2219(95)00176-X – volume: 78 start-page: 1889 year: 1995 ident: 68_CR18 publication-title: J Am Ceram Soc doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08905.x – volume-title: Ceramics – Mechanical Properties, Failure Behaviour, Materials Selection year: 1999 ident: 68_CR16 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-58407-7 – volume: 44 start-page: 543 year: 1996 ident: 68_CR11 publication-title: Acta mater doi: 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00199-9 – volume: 23 start-page: 937 year: 2002 ident: 68_CR4 publication-title: Biomaterials doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00206-X – volume: 82 start-page: 1269 year: 1999 ident: 68_CR13 publication-title: J Am Ceram Soc doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01906.x – volume: 56 start-page: 90 year: 2001 ident: 68_CR22 publication-title: Dtsch Zahnärztl Z – volume: 34 start-page: 149 year: 1997 ident: 68_CR5 publication-title: J Biomed Mater Research doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199702)34:2<149::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-Q – volume-title: In Handbuch der Physik year: 1958 ident: 68_CR15 – reference: 2639004 - Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1989 Nov;44(11):891-3 – reference: 9029293 - J Biomed Mater Res. 1997 Feb;34(2):149-55 – reference: 8408102 - J Biomed Mater Res. 1993 Jun;27(6):729-34 – reference: 11774853 - Biomaterials. 2002 Feb;23(3):937-45 |
SSID | ssj0020069 |
Score | 1.8052727 |
Snippet | Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed to... Background Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus K sub(I )(stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is... BACKGROUND: Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is attributed... Abstract Background Slow crack growth can be described in a v (crack velocity) versus KI (stress intensity factor) diagram. Slow crack growth in ceramics is... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral biomedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 41 |
SubjectTerms | Ceramics Dental Materials - chemistry Equipment Failure Analysis - methods Humidity Materials Testing - methods Stress, Mechanical Surface Properties Zirconium - chemistry |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3PaxwhFJaQQ0gOJUl_bdq0Hgo9SVZn1GdvbUkIhRQKCexN1HVI6DIJu5tD_vu858ymO22XXnob9Mn4fE_9Hur3GPsQggGVMVJNuPCJOkEjYkyGrv0BelgKytBD4Yvv5vyq_jbRk7VUX3QnrKMH7gbuBLRVoW70VDYYuagaZAi2MoBIelo5KDyfYzdeBVN9qEUEvOVdkdXCKT3p6RolmJOnMlEJygM_eOc-G2xPhcX_b9Dz9xuUa1vS2T571mNJ_rnT4YBt5faQ7a0xDB6ynYv-7Pw5-3GJZlvQaRO_6e6tLx94n26HhwWfUb40HkuaJYqfOcJZnuYh_eTYM1x3ig2xLU95TlnsFy_Y1dnp5ddz0SdUEFHbaimIqaYK0-BME01WEBC8hNoFen0LGkKNX9EaaQBxS4bKRGWShWQanQLx5r9k2-1tm18z7kyOaBUZK7SLklMYB6tdk9M4Six3I_ZpMK7-riPP8ERnPazBmeXJKJ6M4itfyxETKyP41FOVU8aMmS8hC5g_5D8-ya_-s0nyC9l00JtSgC7ne5fz_3K5EXu_8giPk5FOWEKbb-8XXhL3jXJyswQhBcDh3SxhLIFugBF71fnYL5UQ-uECjG3NwPsG2gxr2pvrQhmuEQYDHP0P7d-w3Y7sUgpp37Lt5fw-HyMwW8Z3ZQ4-AvdTM9Q priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Threshold intensity factors as lower boundaries for crack propagation in ceramics |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15548323 https://www.proquest.com/docview/19481291 https://www.proquest.com/docview/21238863 https://www.proquest.com/docview/67192388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-3-41 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC539288 https://doaj.org/article/8572a4f5d1f4462481aa7368174d3983 |
Volume | 3 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3daxQxEA9SQfRBtH6tHzUPgk_RZvOxs4KIiqUIJwg9uLeQ5LK2eOzp7RXsf-9Mdq_t2t6Lb8fuhNtkZja_2SS_H2OvvLdQJqxUI774hI7QiBCipW1_gBEWfWnpoPDkmz2c6q8zM7vY_zQMYHdtaUd6UtPV4s2f32cfMOHf54QH-1bqyoi6NDOhBJ1hv4mzkqVCbKLPVxSocq4H0sarbbI4D2J3RapFo4Pvi9F8lWn9r8Oi_26pvDRHHdxjdwdwyT_20XCf3UjtLrtziXJwl92aDIvpD9j3I_RjR8tP_KTfyL4-44P-DvcdX5CAGg9Zd4kKao74lseVjz85Phm-iLJTsS2PaUWy9t1DNj34cvT5UAwKCyKYSq0FUdcoP_e1bYJNJXhEM17Xno7jggGv8VeorLSAQCaBsqG0sYJoGxM9Eek_Yjvtsk1PGK9tCroxMijZ6FLOYd9Xpm5S3A8Sr9cFezcaV_erZ9NwxG89voOp5sg_jvzjlNOyYGLjBBcH7nKS0Fi4XMOAvWL_-tx-8z_bLD-RT0dPky8sVz_ckLwOTFV67MQcu6ZtqUF6XykLWM3NVQ2qYC83EeEwO2nJxbdpedo5SWQ4ZS23WxB0ABze7Ra2IhQOULDHfYxddGmI2YLZUfSNejO-054cZw5xg7gY4On_NnzGbveMl1LI6jnbWa9O0wtEZ-uwl79q7OXk-wtBnTti |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Threshold+intensity+factors+as+lower+boundaries+for+crack+propagation+in+ceramics&rft.jtitle=Biomedical+engineering+online&rft.au=Marx%2C+Rudolf&rft.au=Jungwirth%2C+Franz&rft.au=Walter%2C+Per-Ole&rft.date=2004-11-17&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1475-925X&rft.volume=3&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=41&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1475-925X-3-41&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F15548323&rft.externalDocID=PMC539288 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1475-925X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1475-925X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1475-925X&client=summon |