Can community involvement policies mitigate NIMBYism and local opposition to asylum seeker centres?

• Published in: Policy and politics Vol. 49; no. 4; pp. 553 - 571
• Main Authors: Dekker, Rianne, Oliver, Caroline, Geuijen, Karin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Policy Press 01.10.2021; The Policy Press
• Subjects: Asylum Seeker Centre; Attitudes; Community Involvement; Competition; Contact Hypothesis; Facility Siting; Facility siting disputes; Homeless people; Hypotheses; Local government; Local Opposition; Minority & ethnic groups; Mixed Methods; Mixed methods research; Neighborhoods; Nimbyism; Participation; Political asylum; Refugees; Residents; Shelters; Threats; Utrecht; community involvement; mixed methods; Utrecht; local opposition; NIMBYism; contact hypothesis; asylum seeker centre; facility siting
• ISSN: 0305-5736; 1470-8442
• DOI: 10.1332/030557321X16305840835010

Local governments have to take authoritative decisions about the placement of controversial but necessary facilities such as Asylum Seeker Centres (ASCs). Opposition from local residents against such facilities is often considered to be an expression of NIMBYism. This article explores whether a policy of community involvement addressing the underlying reasons for local opposition can mitigate such opposition towards an ASC. It uses a mixed methods approach combining survey data and semi-structured interviews among neighbourhood residents about an ASC in Utrecht. Local opposition is associated with experiences of economic competition and cultural threat. The policy strategy did not moderate these effects. Those who became involved were a selective group of locals who were largely already accepting of the centre and its inhabitants and involvement was often incidental. However, contact between asylum seekers and neighbours developing within and beyond the ASC mediated the effect of cultural threat - confirming Allport's contact hypothesis.