Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex
Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (a...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC neuroscience Vol. 8; no. 1; p. 16 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
22.02.2007
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1471-2202 1471-2202 |
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-8-16 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (approximately 150-300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands.
Participants successfully performed the primary visual attention task as revealed by behavioral performance and selected event-related potential components (Selection Negativity and P3b). Replicating previous results, emotional modulation of the EPN was observed in a task condition with low processing demands. In contrast, pleasant and unpleasant pictures failed to elicit increased EPN amplitudes compared to neutral images in more difficult explicit attention task conditions. Further analyses determined that even the processing of pleasant and unpleasant pictures high in emotional arousal is subject to interference in experimental conditions with high task demand. Taken together, performing demanding feature-based counting tasks interfered with differential emotion processing indexed by the EPN.
The present findings demonstrate that taxing processing resources by a competing primary visual attention task markedly attenuated the early discrimination of emotional from neutral picture contents. Thus, these results provide further empirical support for an interference account of the emotion-attention interaction under conditions of competition. Previous studies revealed the interference of selective emotion processing when attentional resources were directed to locations of explicitly task-relevant stimuli. The present data suggest that interference of emotion processing by competing task demands is a more general phenomenon extending to the domain of feature-based attention. Furthermore, the results are inconsistent with the notion of effortlessness, i.e., early emotion discrimination despite concurrent task demands. These findings implicate to assess the presumed automatic nature of emotion processing at the level of specific aspects rather than considering automaticity as an all-or-none phenomenon. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (approximately 150-300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands.
Participants successfully performed the primary visual attention task as revealed by behavioral performance and selected event-related potential components (Selection Negativity and P3b). Replicating previous results, emotional modulation of the EPN was observed in a task condition with low processing demands. In contrast, pleasant and unpleasant pictures failed to elicit increased EPN amplitudes compared to neutral images in more difficult explicit attention task conditions. Further analyses determined that even the processing of pleasant and unpleasant pictures high in emotional arousal is subject to interference in experimental conditions with high task demand. Taken together, performing demanding feature-based counting tasks interfered with differential emotion processing indexed by the EPN.
The present findings demonstrate that taxing processing resources by a competing primary visual attention task markedly attenuated the early discrimination of emotional from neutral picture contents. Thus, these results provide further empirical support for an interference account of the emotion-attention interaction under conditions of competition. Previous studies revealed the interference of selective emotion processing when attentional resources were directed to locations of explicitly task-relevant stimuli. The present data suggest that interference of emotion processing by competing task demands is a more general phenomenon extending to the domain of feature-based attention. Furthermore, the results are inconsistent with the notion of effortlessness, i.e., early emotion discrimination despite concurrent task demands. These findings implicate to assess the presumed automatic nature of emotion processing at the level of specific aspects rather than considering automaticity as an all-or-none phenomenon. Abstract Background Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (~150–300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands. Results Participants successfully performed the primary visual attention task as revealed by behavioral performance and selected event-related potential components (Selection Negativity and P3b). Replicating previous results, emotional modulation of the EPN was observed in a task condition with low processing demands. In contrast, pleasant and unpleasant pictures failed to elicit increased EPN amplitudes compared to neutral images in more difficult explicit attention task conditions. Further analyses determined that even the processing of pleasant and unpleasant pictures high in emotional arousal is subject to interference in experimental conditions with high task demand. Taken together, performing demanding feature-based counting tasks interfered with differential emotion processing indexed by the EPN. Conclusion The present findings demonstrate that taxing processing resources by a competing primary visual attention task markedly attenuated the early discrimination of emotional from neutral picture contents. Thus, these results provide further empirical support for an interference account of the emotion-attention interaction under conditions of competition. Previous studies revealed the interference of selective emotion processing when attentional resources were directed to locations of explicitly task-relevant stimuli. The present data suggest that interference of emotion processing by competing task demands is a more general phenomenon extending to the domain of feature-based attention. Furthermore, the results are inconsistent with the notion of effortlessness, i.e., early emotion discrimination despite concurrent task demands. These findings implicate to assess the presumed automatic nature of emotion processing at the level of specific aspects rather than considering automaticity as an all-or-none phenomenon. Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (approximately 150-300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands.BACKGROUNDBrain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (approximately 150-300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands.Participants successfully performed the primary visual attention task as revealed by behavioral performance and selected event-related potential components (Selection Negativity and P3b). Replicating previous results, emotional modulation of the EPN was observed in a task condition with low processing demands. In contrast, pleasant and unpleasant pictures failed to elicit increased EPN amplitudes compared to neutral images in more difficult explicit attention task conditions. Further analyses determined that even the processing of pleasant and unpleasant pictures high in emotional arousal is subject to interference in experimental conditions with high task demand. Taken together, performing demanding feature-based counting tasks interfered with differential emotion processing indexed by the EPN.RESULTSParticipants successfully performed the primary visual attention task as revealed by behavioral performance and selected event-related potential components (Selection Negativity and P3b). Replicating previous results, emotional modulation of the EPN was observed in a task condition with low processing demands. In contrast, pleasant and unpleasant pictures failed to elicit increased EPN amplitudes compared to neutral images in more difficult explicit attention task conditions. Further analyses determined that even the processing of pleasant and unpleasant pictures high in emotional arousal is subject to interference in experimental conditions with high task demand. Taken together, performing demanding feature-based counting tasks interfered with differential emotion processing indexed by the EPN.The present findings demonstrate that taxing processing resources by a competing primary visual attention task markedly attenuated the early discrimination of emotional from neutral picture contents. Thus, these results provide further empirical support for an interference account of the emotion-attention interaction under conditions of competition. Previous studies revealed the interference of selective emotion processing when attentional resources were directed to locations of explicitly task-relevant stimuli. The present data suggest that interference of emotion processing by competing task demands is a more general phenomenon extending to the domain of feature-based attention. Furthermore, the results are inconsistent with the notion of effortlessness, i.e., early emotion discrimination despite concurrent task demands. These findings implicate to assess the presumed automatic nature of emotion processing at the level of specific aspects rather than considering automaticity as an all-or-none phenomenon.CONCLUSIONThe present findings demonstrate that taxing processing resources by a competing primary visual attention task markedly attenuated the early discrimination of emotional from neutral picture contents. Thus, these results provide further empirical support for an interference account of the emotion-attention interaction under conditions of competition. Previous studies revealed the interference of selective emotion processing when attentional resources were directed to locations of explicitly task-relevant stimuli. The present data suggest that interference of emotion processing by competing task demands is a more general phenomenon extending to the domain of feature-based attention. Furthermore, the results are inconsistent with the notion of effortlessness, i.e., early emotion discrimination despite concurrent task demands. These findings implicate to assess the presumed automatic nature of emotion processing at the level of specific aspects rather than considering automaticity as an all-or-none phenomenon. Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images ( similar to 150- 300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands. Results Participants successfully performed the primary visual attention task as revealed by behavioral performance and selected event- related potential components (Selection Negativity and P3b). Replicating previous results, emotional modulation of the EPN was observed in a task condition with low processing demands. In contrast, pleasant and unpleasant pictures failed to elicit increased EPN amplitudes compared to neutral images in more difficult explicit attention task conditions. Further analyses determined that even the processing of pleasant and unpleasant pictures high in emotional arousal is subject to interference in experimental conditions with high task demand. Taken together, performing demanding feature-based counting tasks interfered with differential emotion processing indexed by the EPN. Conclusion The present findings demonstrate that taxing processing resources by a competing primary visual attention task markedly attenuated the early discrimination of emotional from neutral picture contents. Thus, these results provide further empirical support for an interference account of the emotion-attention interaction under conditions of competition. Previous studies revealed the interference of selective emotion processing when attentional resources were directed to locations of explicitly task-relevant stimuli. The present data suggest that interference of emotion processing by competing task demands is a more general phenomenon extending to the domain of feature-based attention. Furthermore, the results are inconsistent with the notion of effortlessness, i.e., early emotion discrimination despite concurrent task demands. These findings implicate to assess the presumed automatic nature of emotion processing at the level of specific aspects rather than considering automaticity as an all- or-none phenomenon. BACKGROUND: Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (~150-300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands. RESULTS: Participants successfully performed the primary visual attention task as revealed by behavioral performance and selected event-related potential components (Selection Negativity and P3b). Replicating previous results, emotional modulation of the EPN was observed in a task condition with low processing demands. In contrast, pleasant and unpleasant pictures failed to elicit increased EPN amplitudes compared to neutral images in more difficult explicit attention task conditions. Further analyses determined that even the processing of pleasant and unpleasant pictures high in emotional arousal is subject to interference in experimental conditions with high task demand. Taken together, performing demanding feature-based counting tasks interfered with differential emotion processing indexed by the EPN. CONCLUSION: The present findings demonstrate that taxing processing resources by a competing primary visual attention task markedly attenuated the early discrimination of emotional from neutral picture contents. Thus, these results provide further empirical support for an interference account of the emotion-attention interaction under conditions of competition. Previous studies revealed the interference of selective emotion processing when attentional resources were directed to locations of explicitly task-relevant stimuli. The present data suggest that interference of emotion processing by competing task demands is a more general phenomenon extending to the domain of feature-based attention. Furthermore, the results are inconsistent with the notion of effortlessness, i.e., early emotion discrimination despite concurrent task demands. These findings implicate to assess the presumed automatic nature of emotion processing at the level of specific aspects rather than considering automaticity as an all-or-none phenomenon. |
ArticleNumber | 16 |
Author | Stockburger, Jessica Schupp, Harald T Junghöfer, Markus Hamm, Alfons O Bublatzky, Florian Weike, Almut I |
AuthorAffiliation | 3 Department of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Germany 2 Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, Münster University Hospital, Germany 1 Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 3 Department of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Germany – name: 1 Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany – name: 2 Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, Münster University Hospital, Germany |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Harald T surname: Schupp fullname: Schupp, Harald T – sequence: 2 givenname: Jessica surname: Stockburger fullname: Stockburger, Jessica – sequence: 3 givenname: Florian surname: Bublatzky fullname: Bublatzky, Florian – sequence: 4 givenname: Markus surname: Junghöfer fullname: Junghöfer, Markus – sequence: 5 givenname: Almut I surname: Weike fullname: Weike, Almut I – sequence: 6 givenname: Alfons O surname: Hamm fullname: Hamm, Alfons O |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17316444$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkk1v1DAQhi1URNuFK0eUE7cUj-1NnAtSVRWoVIkL3JAsf0x2XSXxYnvL8u9xuqV0QRUnWzPvPJqP95QcTWFCQl4DPQOQzTsQLdSMUVbLGppn5OQhcPTof0xOU7qhFFop2AtyDC2HRghxQr5d7jaDtz5XOmecsg9T5aeMsceIqfrh87pKOKDN_hYrHMOdYhODxZT8tCriar0d9VThLkedcvQ6Y2VDzLh7SZ73ekj46v5dkK8fLr9cfKqvP3-8uji_rs1S8FxLxi0TXPMGrNSUNYIBY6LnbGm4M2WItgHeOeBCWKRo-iVlrBN9x6xxruMLcrXnuqBv1Cb6UcefKmiv7gIhrpSO2dsBlegogHauF8YJ2zkj-6ZtpQUrnDUaCuv9nrXZmhGdLTuJejiAHmYmv1arcKtAUimapgDO9wDjwxOAw4wNo5ovpeZLKalgZry9byKG71tMWY0-WRwGPWHYJtVSxlsK3X-F0JXN8XLuBXnzeKyHdn47oQjO9gIbQ0oR-z8Sqmar_duj-KuguEjP9ihT-eGpsl8CZdkS |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2016_03_020 crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nsaa098 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neulet_2010_04_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neulet_2023_137498 crossref_primary_10_5762_KAIS_2013_14_10_5003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2021_108056 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13415_013_0173_7 crossref_primary_10_1177_17470218221075146 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0037186 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2009_10_076 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2010_11_001 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13415_022_00998_x crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0109070 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2024_09_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2010_06_074 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2019_03_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2011_06_005 crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nst171 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0035767 crossref_primary_10_1177_17470218241311202 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neulet_2020_135545 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8986_2010_01062_x crossref_primary_10_1007_BF03076419 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8986_2010_01041_x crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nsq066 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpsycho_2022_11_006 crossref_primary_10_1080_09541440903427487 crossref_primary_10_12677_AP_2017_75079 crossref_primary_10_1027_0269_8803_a000030 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandc_2018_04_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpsycho_2011_12_005 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2018_00382 crossref_primary_10_1080_02699930801987504 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2020_107529 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2008_07_024 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_023_01852_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2007_11_006 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8986_2007_00600_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2022_108310 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2022_108399 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2018_00708 crossref_primary_10_3758_CABN_9_2_168 crossref_primary_10_1097_WNR_0b013e32832b02fe crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2008_03_004 crossref_primary_10_1093_cercor_bhv130 crossref_primary_10_1093_cercor_bhr250 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0230775 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8986_2010_01130_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpsycho_2014_05_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_braindev_2008_04_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2008_12_012 crossref_primary_10_1080_17470919_2024_2365172 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2023_108785 crossref_primary_10_4306_pi_2013_10_2_164 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2013_06_005 crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nsx001 crossref_primary_10_1080_13506285_2025_2451368 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8986_2007_00638_x crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2014_01351 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pmedr_2018_10_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2017_03_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2018_05_025 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandl_2013_02_008 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_022_01756_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2021_07_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2018_01_021 crossref_primary_10_1024_1016_264X_19_2_91 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2013_05_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2024_02_003 crossref_primary_10_1097_WNR_0000000000000227 crossref_primary_10_1111_psyp_13585 crossref_primary_10_1155_2017_5282670 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2019_06_040 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_2008_21151 crossref_primary_10_1093_texcom_tgaa040 crossref_primary_10_12677_ASS_2024_133195 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2202_14_139 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2012_04_021 crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nsp033 crossref_primary_10_1111_psyp_12809 crossref_primary_10_1111_psyp_13819 |
Cites_doi | 10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.276 10.1038/sj.mp.4000812 10.1017/S0048577299971135 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56008-X 10.1080/02699930341000239 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00214-8 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00092-2 10.1038/nn1549 10.1093/cercor/bhh023 10.1111/j.1464-8986.2006.00386.x 10.1111/1469-8986.3820175 10.1073/pnas.172403899 10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00075-6 10.1097/01.wnr.0000198437.59883.bb 10.1038/30976 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2032-05.2005 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-10-06846.1995 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.011 10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.189 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.028 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483 10.1097/00001756-200306110-00002 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00174.x 10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.839 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01852-0 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127 10.1038/381520a0 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-13-05627.2003 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.015 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.018 10.1111/1469-8986.3740523 10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00268-9 10.1037/0735-7044.117.2.369 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004 10.1111/1467-9280.00490 10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.451 10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1656 10.1111/1467-9280.01411 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56007-8 10.1097/01.wnr.0000203355.88061.c6 10.1007/BF01190389 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1680 10.1017/S0048577299970634 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2007 Schupp et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007 Schupp et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2007 Schupp et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007 Schupp et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TK 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-8-16 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals (Roanoke) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic Neurosciences Abstracts |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1471-2202 |
EndPage | 16 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_49011addf4bd4c9db8f6778c1c4dcba1 PMC1808466 oai_biomedcentral_com_1471_2202_8_16 17316444 10_1186_1471_2202_8_16 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 123 23N 2VQ 2WC 4.4 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABIVO ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACMJI ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BFQNJ BMC C1A C6C CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HYE IAO IGS IHR INH INR IPNFZ IPY ITC KQ8 M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT RBZ RIG RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS U2A W2D WOQ WOW XSB -A0 ACRMQ ADINQ C24 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM NXXTH 7TK 7X8 ABVAZ AFGXO AFNRJ 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-b543t-823c243a361c8a026421224f325b3db47176139d1344ce0ebf502294f92cbdd93 |
IEDL.DBID | RBZ |
ISSN | 1471-2202 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:28:44 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 13:56:55 EDT 2025 Wed May 22 07:11:41 EDT 2024 Fri Jul 11 15:24:26 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 23:14:22 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:12:35 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:25:47 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:50:47 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b543t-823c243a361c8a026421224f325b3db47176139d1344ce0ebf502294f92cbdd93 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-16 |
PMID | 17316444 |
PQID | 19613317 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_49011addf4bd4c9db8f6778c1c4dcba1 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1808466 biomedcentral_primary_oai_biomedcentral_com_1471_2202_8_16 proquest_miscellaneous_70237019 proquest_miscellaneous_19613317 pubmed_primary_17316444 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2202_8_16 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_1471_2202_8_16 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2007-02-22 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2007-02-22 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2007 text: 2007-02-22 day: 22 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | BMC neuroscience |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Neurosci |
PublicationYear | 2007 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | C Kranczioch (314_CR51) 2003; 17 A Öhman (314_CR2) 2000 PJ Lang (314_CR1) 1997 RM Shiffrin (314_CR16) 1977; 84 KL Duckworth (314_CR37) 2002; 13 L Pessoa (314_CR21) 2002; 99 HG Smid (314_CR26) 1999; 36 N Lavie (314_CR32) 2005; 9 AK Anderson (314_CR22) 2003; 23 HT Schupp (314_CR11) 2004; 41 KS LaBar (314_CR42) 1995; 15 MM Bradley (314_CR5) 2003; 117 O Hauk (314_CR35) 2004; 21 EK Vogel (314_CR50) 1998; 24 M Junghöfer (314_CR48) 2000; 37 A Holmes (314_CR24) 2003; 16 PJ Lang (314_CR25) 2005 D Sabatinelli (314_CR7) 2005; 24 N Lavie (314_CR31) 1995; 21 MI Posner (314_CR15) 1975 JA Bargh (314_CR19) 1989 S Moratti (314_CR41) 2006; 43 JS Morris (314_CR39) 1998; 393 M Junghöfer (314_CR36) 2006; 156 A Öhman (314_CR34) 2001; 108 J Globisch (314_CR38) 1999; 36 R Johnson Jr (314_CR30) 1988 HT Schupp (314_CR47) 2004; 18 MM Bradley (314_CR46) 2001; 1 M Junghöfer (314_CR6) 2005; 25 HT Schupp (314_CR10) 2003; 14 HT Schupp (314_CR17) 2003; 14 G Pourtois (314_CR23) 2004; 14 M Junghöfer (314_CR9) 2001; 38 HT Schupp (314_CR13) 2004; 4 C Keysers (314_CR33) 2002; 6 M Davis (314_CR44) 2001; 6 JT Cacioppo (314_CR45) 1999; 76 J Kissler (314_CR14) 2006; 156 M Junghöfer (314_CR8) 2006; 17 JS Morris (314_CR40) 1999; 96 MJ Wieser (314_CR12) 2006; 1096 GF Potts (314_CR27) 2001; 11 DM Tucker (314_CR4) 2000 S Thorpe (314_CR28) 1996; 381 P Vuilleumier (314_CR3) 2005; 9 HT Schupp (314_CR18) 2006; 17 L Pessoa (314_CR20) 2002; 15 314_CR29 AI Weike (314_CR43) 2005; 25 C Sergent (314_CR52) 2005; 8 M Junghöfer (314_CR49) 1997; 9 10194973 - Psychophysiology. 1999 Mar;36(2):264-79 16750819 - Brain Res. 2006 Jun 22;1096(1):138-47 16319311 - J Neurosci. 2005 Nov 30;25(48):11117-24 15102130 - Psychophysiology. 2004 May;41(3):441-9 7472442 - J Neurosci. 1995 Oct;15(10):6846-55 12177449 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20;99(17):11458-63 15670706 - Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 15;24(4):1265-70 7790827 - J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):451-68 10934911 - Psychophysiology. 2000 Jul;37(4):523-32 16712592 - Psychophysiology. 2006 Mar;43(2):216-26 12843265 - J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 2;23(13):5627-33 12668225 - Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Apr;16(2):174-84 17015079 - Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:147-83 9624001 - Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):467-70 15784431 - Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 1;25(2):520-6 10098381 - Psychophysiology. 1999 Jan;36(1):66-75 12708533 - Behav Neurosci. 2003 Apr;117(2):369-80 12433381 - Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Dec;15(1):31-45 17015078 - Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:123-43 16750397 - Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 15;32(2):583-91 11244481 - Mol Psychiatry. 2001 Jan;6(1):13-34 11347862 - Psychophysiology. 2001 Mar;38(2):175-8 9104831 - Brain Topogr. 1997 Spring;9(3):203-17 12430834 - Psychol Sci. 2002 Nov;13(6):513-9 16158062 - Nat Neurosci. 2005 Oct;8(10):1391-400 12763203 - Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jun;17(1):177-87 11240117 - Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Mar;11(1):147-56 15054077 - Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jun;14(6):619-33 9861716 - J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Dec;24(6):1656-74 11488376 - Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):483-522 9990084 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1680-5 15668100 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):75-82 16407776 - Neuroreport. 2006 Feb 6;17(2):225-9 15222855 - Emotion. 2004 Jun;4(2):189-200 16514360 - Neuroreport. 2006 Mar 20;17(4):365-9 8632824 - Nature. 1996 Jun 6;381(6582):520-2 12564747 - Psychol Sci. 2003 Jan;14(1):7-13 15050585 - Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1612-21 12821791 - Neuroreport. 2003 Jun 11;14(8):1107-10 11861189 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Mar 1;6(3):120-125 16289871 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Dec;9(12):585-94 12934687 - Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):276-98 |
References_xml | – volume: 1 start-page: 276 issue: 3 year: 2001 ident: 314_CR46 publication-title: Emotion doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.276 – volume: 6 start-page: 13 issue: 1 year: 2001 ident: 314_CR44 publication-title: Molecular Psychiatry doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000812 – volume: 36 start-page: 264 issue: 2 year: 1999 ident: 314_CR26 publication-title: Psychophysiology doi: 10.1017/S0048577299971135 – start-page: 69 volume-title: Advances in Psychophysiology year: 1988 ident: 314_CR30 – volume: 156 start-page: 147 year: 2006 ident: 314_CR14 publication-title: Progress in Brain Research doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56008-X – volume: 18 start-page: 593 issue: 5 year: 2004 ident: 314_CR47 publication-title: Cognition and Emotion doi: 10.1080/02699930341000239 – volume: 15 start-page: 31 issue: 1 year: 2002 ident: 314_CR20 publication-title: Cognitive Brain Research doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00214-8 – volume: 17 start-page: 177 issue: 1 year: 2003 ident: 314_CR51 publication-title: Cognitive Brain Research doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00092-2 – volume: 8 start-page: 1391 issue: 10 year: 2005 ident: 314_CR52 publication-title: Nature Neuroscience doi: 10.1038/nn1549 – start-page: 56 volume-title: The neuropsychology of emotion year: 2000 ident: 314_CR4 – volume: 14 start-page: 619 issue: 6 year: 2004 ident: 314_CR23 publication-title: Cerebral Cortex doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh023 – volume: 43 start-page: 216 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: 314_CR41 publication-title: Psychophysiology doi: 10.1111/j.1464-8986.2006.00386.x – ident: 314_CR29 – volume: 38 start-page: 175 issue: 2 year: 2001 ident: 314_CR9 publication-title: Psychophysiology doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3820175 – volume: 99 start-page: 11458 issue: 17 year: 2002 ident: 314_CR21 publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America doi: 10.1073/pnas.172403899 – volume: 11 start-page: 147 issue: 1 year: 2001 ident: 314_CR27 publication-title: Cognitive Brain Research doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00075-6 – volume: 17 start-page: 225 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: 314_CR8 publication-title: NeuroReport doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000198437.59883.bb – volume: 393 start-page: 467 issue: 6684 year: 1998 ident: 314_CR39 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/30976 – volume: 25 start-page: 11117 issue: 48 year: 2005 ident: 314_CR43 publication-title: Journal of Neuroscience doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2032-05.2005 – volume: 15 start-page: 6846 issue: 10 year: 1995 ident: 314_CR42 publication-title: Journal of Neuroscience doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-10-06846.1995 – volume: 25 start-page: 520 issue: 2 year: 2005 ident: 314_CR6 publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.011 – start-page: 296 volume-title: Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion year: 2000 ident: 314_CR2 – start-page: 3 volume-title: Unintended thought year: 1989 ident: 314_CR19 – volume: 4 start-page: 189 issue: 2 year: 2004 ident: 314_CR13 publication-title: Emotion doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.189 – start-page: 55 volume-title: Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposion year: 1975 ident: 314_CR15 – volume-title: International affective picture system (IAPS): Digitized photographs, instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report A-6 year: 2005 ident: 314_CR25 – volume: 1096 start-page: 138 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: 314_CR12 publication-title: Brain Research doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.028 – volume: 108 start-page: 483 issue: 3 year: 2001 ident: 314_CR34 publication-title: Psychological Review doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483 – volume: 14 start-page: 1107 issue: 8 year: 2003 ident: 314_CR17 publication-title: Neuroreport doi: 10.1097/00001756-200306110-00002 – volume: 41 start-page: 441 issue: 3 year: 2004 ident: 314_CR11 publication-title: Psychophysiology doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00174.x – volume: 76 start-page: 839 year: 1999 ident: 314_CR45 publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.839 – volume: 6 start-page: 120 issue: 3 year: 2002 ident: 314_CR33 publication-title: Trends in Cognitive Sciences doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01852-0 – volume: 84 start-page: 125 year: 1977 ident: 314_CR16 publication-title: Psychological Review doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127 – volume: 381 start-page: 520 issue: 6582 year: 1996 ident: 314_CR28 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/381520a0 – volume: 23 start-page: 5627 issue: 13 year: 2003 ident: 314_CR22 publication-title: Journal of Neuroscience doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-13-05627.2003 – volume: 24 start-page: 1265 issue: 4 year: 2005 ident: 314_CR7 publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.015 – volume: 21 start-page: 1612 issue: 4 year: 2004 ident: 314_CR35 publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.018 – volume: 37 start-page: 523 issue: 4 year: 2000 ident: 314_CR48 publication-title: Psychophysiology doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3740523 – volume: 9 start-page: 585 issue: 12 year: 2005 ident: 314_CR3 publication-title: Trends in Cognitive Sciences doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011 – volume: 16 start-page: 174 issue: 2 year: 2003 ident: 314_CR24 publication-title: Cognitive Brain Research doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00268-9 – volume: 117 start-page: 369 issue: 2 year: 2003 ident: 314_CR5 publication-title: Behavioral Neuroscience doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.2.369 – volume: 9 start-page: 75 issue: 2 year: 2005 ident: 314_CR32 publication-title: Trends in Cognitive Sciences doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004 – volume: 13 start-page: 513 issue: 6 year: 2002 ident: 314_CR37 publication-title: Psychological Science doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00490 – volume: 21 start-page: 451 issue: 3 year: 1995 ident: 314_CR31 publication-title: Journal of Experimantal Psychology: Human Perception and Performance doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.451 – volume: 24 start-page: 1656 issue: 6 year: 1998 ident: 314_CR50 publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1656 – volume: 14 start-page: 7 issue: 1 year: 2003 ident: 314_CR10 publication-title: Psychological Science doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.01411 – volume: 156 start-page: 123 year: 2006 ident: 314_CR36 publication-title: Progress in Brain Research doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56007-8 – volume: 17 start-page: 365 issue: 4 year: 2006 ident: 314_CR18 publication-title: Neuroreport doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000203355.88061.c6 – volume: 9 start-page: 203 issue: 4 year: 1997 ident: 314_CR49 publication-title: Brain Topography doi: 10.1007/BF01190389 – volume: 96 start-page: 1680 issue: 4 year: 1999 ident: 314_CR40 publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1680 – start-page: 97 volume-title: Attention and Emotion: Sensory and Motivational Processes year: 1997 ident: 314_CR1 – volume: 36 start-page: 66 issue: 1 year: 1999 ident: 314_CR38 publication-title: Psychophysiology doi: 10.1017/S0048577299970634 – reference: 16407776 - Neuroreport. 2006 Feb 6;17(2):225-9 – reference: 15054077 - Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jun;14(6):619-33 – reference: 16289871 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Dec;9(12):585-94 – reference: 9990084 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1680-5 – reference: 12668225 - Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Apr;16(2):174-84 – reference: 16319311 - J Neurosci. 2005 Nov 30;25(48):11117-24 – reference: 12708533 - Behav Neurosci. 2003 Apr;117(2):369-80 – reference: 11244481 - Mol Psychiatry. 2001 Jan;6(1):13-34 – reference: 12177449 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20;99(17):11458-63 – reference: 15670706 - Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 15;24(4):1265-70 – reference: 10098381 - Psychophysiology. 1999 Jan;36(1):66-75 – reference: 9861716 - J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Dec;24(6):1656-74 – reference: 9104831 - Brain Topogr. 1997 Spring;9(3):203-17 – reference: 15050585 - Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1612-21 – reference: 12763203 - Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jun;17(1):177-87 – reference: 15668100 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):75-82 – reference: 8632824 - Nature. 1996 Jun 6;381(6582):520-2 – reference: 11240117 - Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Mar;11(1):147-56 – reference: 15222855 - Emotion. 2004 Jun;4(2):189-200 – reference: 17015078 - Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:123-43 – reference: 12564747 - Psychol Sci. 2003 Jan;14(1):7-13 – reference: 7472442 - J Neurosci. 1995 Oct;15(10):6846-55 – reference: 10934911 - Psychophysiology. 2000 Jul;37(4):523-32 – reference: 16750819 - Brain Res. 2006 Jun 22;1096(1):138-47 – reference: 16750397 - Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 15;32(2):583-91 – reference: 10194973 - Psychophysiology. 1999 Mar;36(2):264-79 – reference: 16158062 - Nat Neurosci. 2005 Oct;8(10):1391-400 – reference: 17015079 - Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:147-83 – reference: 9624001 - Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):467-70 – reference: 12821791 - Neuroreport. 2003 Jun 11;14(8):1107-10 – reference: 11488376 - Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):483-522 – reference: 16712592 - Psychophysiology. 2006 Mar;43(2):216-26 – reference: 7790827 - J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):451-68 – reference: 15784431 - Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 1;25(2):520-6 – reference: 11347862 - Psychophysiology. 2001 Mar;38(2):175-8 – reference: 12433381 - Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Dec;15(1):31-45 – reference: 16514360 - Neuroreport. 2006 Mar 20;17(4):365-9 – reference: 12430834 - Psychol Sci. 2002 Nov;13(6):513-9 – reference: 12934687 - Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):276-98 – reference: 15102130 - Psychophysiology. 2004 May;41(3):441-9 – reference: 12843265 - J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 2;23(13):5627-33 – reference: 11861189 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Mar 1;6(3):120-125 |
SSID | ssj0017842 |
Score | 2.1522434 |
Snippet | Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection... BACKGROUND: Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A... Abstract Background Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral biomedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 16 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Attention - physiology Brain Mapping Cues Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology Emotions - physiology Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology Female Humans Male Psychomotor Performance - physiology Visual Cortex - physiology Volition - physiology |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals (Roanoke) dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1BT90wDI4mDmiXaQO2dQzIAYlTxEvipuluA4EQEpxA4oAUNUmjTUIFvVek_XzstA8oG9qF21Nr9aWJHduN_X2M7c4S9VfqKNDVJUxQqkbYEiohNQ5bWQMpF4-fnZuTSzi9Kq-eUX1RTdgADzxM3D5QbyQaYQIfIdTR20SYZ0EGiME3OfFBn7dMpsbzg8pm2hyJW69Qimp4MlyjtGb_8ZrA9Mm86HO_mbinjOL_r9DzZQXlM5d0_JF9GGNJ_nN4h0_sXdutsdWz8bR8nV1TgR3-7jmBaOayRk7wEHPq8Vtw-gTLF5kHB7c83g6EPvxuaB1Al4bCPHP4cdzB501m-OhbHqg-988Guzw-ujg8ESObgvAl6F5YpYMC3Wgjg20w9aKzYAVJq9Lr6HFWKnTtdZQaILSz1qcS_XsNqVbBx1jrz2ylu-3ar4xHGyt8aMLoJ4H1mCFag54wJQymQlOqgv2YTKq7G5AzHGFZT--gWTlaEUcr4qyTpmBiuQIujDjlRJdx43K-Ys1f8nuP8sv_eU3ygBZ0Mpp8AfXNjfrm_qdvBdtZqoNDS6TjlaZrb-8XDvcyTPhl9bpEhQESwd8X7MugPk8DJgIxAChYNVGsyVind7rfvzIauLQzjCHNt7d4uU32fvh2rdBCvrOVfn7fbmHQ1fvtbF8PKV4rhg priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3di9QwEA96gvginp_VO82D4FN1k0zTVDhExeMQ1icX7kEITdJ4wtI9uz04_3tn0u6tvY8330o7bdMkk5lpZn4_xl7PItVXqpCjqYsYoJR1bgooc6Gw2dJoiCl5fP5NHy3g63FxvM1_GjtwfW1oR3xSi2759vz3nw-o8AdJ4Y1-J3CBzaUk1c6Fvs3uoFUqicZhDtsdhdIkIp0L2RHA8er9lyrflxODlXD9r3NGL-dU_mOkDh-w-6N3yT8O02GX3Wrah-zufNw_f8R-UModHvecYDVToiMnwIiOqv7WnH7K8nVixsFFkDcDxQ8_HYoJ0MihME-sfhzX9K5OnB99wz1l7J4_ZovDL98_H-Ujv0LuClB9bqTyElSttPCmxmCMdoclRCULp4LDXinR2FdBKADfzBoXC7T4FcRKehdCpZ6wnXbVNs8YDyaU-NCI_lAE4zBmNBptY4zoXvm6kBl7P-lUezpgaVhCt55eQUWzNCKWRsQaK3TG8s0IWD8ilxOBxtKmCMboK_JvLuQ377lJ8hMN6KQ16cSq-2lH1bVA1bloBiK4AL4KzkRC3fPCQ_CuFhl7tZkOFnWTNlzqtlmdrS2ubkKhg3azRIkuEwHiZ-zpMH22DSZKMQDIWDmZWJO2Tq-0v04SPrgwM_Qq9fP_8XEv2L3hb7ZEDdljO3131uyjG9a7l0m__gI3ljFX priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17316444 https://www.proquest.com/docview/19613317 https://www.proquest.com/docview/70237019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-16 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC1808466 https://doaj.org/article/49011addf4bd4c9db8f6778c1c4dcba1 |
Volume | 8 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9swEBdbC2MvY92nuzbTw2BPZpF0tuS-pWOlBLKHbYUyBsKSLFYobklc2J-_O9lJ63R92ksI8SUROt2X7u53jH2YRuqvVCFHUxcxQNF1bgrQuVC4bGlKiKl4fPG1PD2D-XlxfnvfsZXBF6b8JFB95lKS4OaifMx2JWigIQ3fjn9u8gXapDE5G9oBnvH-97f62i9H5iih9v_L1dyumLxjgk6es2eD78hnPbP32KOmfcGeLIbs-Ev2iwrq8H3HCTQzlTFygoNYUk_fitOVK1-luTeo4njTD_Dh132rAJowJOZpZh9Hjb2s00SPruGe6nH_vGJnJ19-fD7Nh-kJuStAdbmRyktQtSqFNzWGWpT7lRCVLJwKDndFoymvglAAvpk2LhZozyuIlfQuhEq9ZjvtVdu8ZTyYoPFHI3o7EYzDiNCUaPliROfJ14XM2NFoU-11j5RhCbt6_ATFyBJHLHHEGivKjOVrDlg_4JLTeIxLm-ITU96j_7ihX__PQ5THxNDRatIHeLzsIJgWqPcWlXwEF8BXwZlImHpeeAje1SJj79fHwaLkUTqlbpurm5VF3YUBvtAPU2h0iAjuPmNv-uNzu2AaGAYAGdOjgzVa6_hJe_E7oX8LM0Wfsdz_nz1_x572d9QSJeOA7XTLm-YQnavOTdjubDb_Pp-kywl8XYCZJFn7Cw1dJRg |
linkProvider | BioMedCentral |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELagSMAF8Sa86gMSJ8P6kdjhRhHVAt0eUCtVCMmKXwVpyVa7qcTPZ8bJLpuWnrhFySQZeTwP2zPfEPJqkrC-UgYGri7BAkU3zJRKMy6BbWEqlXLy-Oywmh6rzyflyQAphLUw7pffAnKMb7aL0OfZcq8Txnp9N9VbDvaVCYGazXh1ndzQZalRR7_ufdscKGiT--hsaAf8xsvvXyh8n4_8VYb1_1csejGlcstH7d8ld4bgkr7veb9HrsX2Prk5G47PH5DvmHEH1x1FVM2c50gRL2KJRX8rinuydJUb44ANpLHv8EPP-loC8HFATHNTPwomfdnklh9dpB4Tdn8_JMf7H48-TNnQXoG5UsmOGSG9ULKRFfemgbUYHg4LlaQonQwORkWDr68Dl0r5OIkuleDwa5Vq4V0ItXxEdtpFG58QGkzQ8NEE4VBSxsGS0VTgGlOC6Mo3pSjIu9Gg2rMeSsMiuPX4CYjYokQsSsQay6uCsLUErB-Ay7F_xtzmBYypLtG_3tCv_3MV5R4KdMRNvrFYntphnlmFxbngBZJyQfk6OJMQdM9zr4J3DS_I7no6WFBNPG9p2rg4X1kwblxCfHY1hYaICfHwC_K4nz5_GcaOYkqpgujRxBrxOn7S_vyR4cG5mUBQWT39nzHfJbemR7MDe_Dp8Mszcrvf0BagJc_JTrc8jy8gEuvcy6xjfwA1sTI2 |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELagSBUXxJvwqg9InEzXjzgONwqsyqMVBypVCMmKX4BYsqvdVOLnM-Nkl01LT9yiZJJYHs_LnvmGkGeThPWVMjAwdQkClKphplQV4xKGLYxWKSePHx3rwxP1_rQ8HfKfsBbG_fJbQI7xxXYR-ixrbrjwP_cXIfUCb_Q-BwXLhEDRZlxfJdcqxJXCyP3gy-ZEoTK5kc6GdgBwvPj-ucr32chgZVz_fzmj53Mqt4zU9Ca5MXiX9FW_HG6RK7G9TXaPhvPzO-QrptzBdUcRVjMnOlIEjFhi1d-K4qYsXeXOOKAEaexb_NBFX0wARg6Iae7qR0GnL5vc86OL1GPG7u-75GT69vPrQzb0V2CuVLJjRkgvlGyk5t40EIzh6bBQSYrSyeBgViow9nXgUikfJ9GlEix-rVItvAuhlvfITjtv4wNCgwkVfDSBP5SUcRAzGg22MSVwr3xTioK8HE2qXfRYGhbRrcdPgMcWOWKRI9ZYrgvC1hywfkAuxwYaM5sjGKMv0D_f0K__cxnlATJ0NJp8Y778ZgfRtQqrc8EMJOWC8nVwJiHqnudeBe8aXpC99XKwIJt44NK0cX62sqDduAQH7XKKClwmBMQvyP1--fwdMLYUU0oVpBotrNFYx0_aH98zPjg3E_Aq9cP_mfM9svvpzdR-fHf84RG53m9oCxCSx2SnW57FJ-CJde5pFrE_p0EyAQ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Explicit+attention+interferes+with+selective+emotion+processing+in+human+extrastriate+cortex&rft.jtitle=BMC+neuroscience&rft.au=Jungh%C3%B6fer+Markus&rft.au=Bublatzky+Florian&rft.au=Stockburger+Jessica&rft.au=Schupp+Harald+T&rft.date=2007-02-22&rft.pub=BMC&rft.issn=1471-2202&rft.eissn=1471-2202&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1471-2202-8-16&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_49011addf4bd4c9db8f6778c1c4dcba1 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2202&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2202&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2202&client=summon |