Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex

Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC neuroscience Vol. 8; no. 1; p. 16
Main Authors Schupp, Harald T, Stockburger, Jessica, Bublatzky, Florian, Junghöfer, Markus, Weike, Almut I, Hamm, Alfons O
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 22.02.2007
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1471-2202
1471-2202
DOI10.1186/1471-2202-8-16

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (approximately 150-300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands. Participants successfully performed the primary visual attention task as revealed by behavioral performance and selected event-related potential components (Selection Negativity and P3b). Replicating previous results, emotional modulation of the EPN was observed in a task condition with low processing demands. In contrast, pleasant and unpleasant pictures failed to elicit increased EPN amplitudes compared to neutral images in more difficult explicit attention task conditions. Further analyses determined that even the processing of pleasant and unpleasant pictures high in emotional arousal is subject to interference in experimental conditions with high task demand. Taken together, performing demanding feature-based counting tasks interfered with differential emotion processing indexed by the EPN. The present findings demonstrate that taxing processing resources by a competing primary visual attention task markedly attenuated the early discrimination of emotional from neutral picture contents. Thus, these results provide further empirical support for an interference account of the emotion-attention interaction under conditions of competition. Previous studies revealed the interference of selective emotion processing when attentional resources were directed to locations of explicitly task-relevant stimuli. The present data suggest that interference of emotion processing by competing task demands is a more general phenomenon extending to the domain of feature-based attention. Furthermore, the results are inconsistent with the notion of effortlessness, i.e., early emotion discrimination despite concurrent task demands. These findings implicate to assess the presumed automatic nature of emotion processing at the level of specific aspects rather than considering automaticity as an all-or-none phenomenon.
AbstractList Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (approximately 150-300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands. Participants successfully performed the primary visual attention task as revealed by behavioral performance and selected event-related potential components (Selection Negativity and P3b). Replicating previous results, emotional modulation of the EPN was observed in a task condition with low processing demands. In contrast, pleasant and unpleasant pictures failed to elicit increased EPN amplitudes compared to neutral images in more difficult explicit attention task conditions. Further analyses determined that even the processing of pleasant and unpleasant pictures high in emotional arousal is subject to interference in experimental conditions with high task demand. Taken together, performing demanding feature-based counting tasks interfered with differential emotion processing indexed by the EPN. The present findings demonstrate that taxing processing resources by a competing primary visual attention task markedly attenuated the early discrimination of emotional from neutral picture contents. Thus, these results provide further empirical support for an interference account of the emotion-attention interaction under conditions of competition. Previous studies revealed the interference of selective emotion processing when attentional resources were directed to locations of explicitly task-relevant stimuli. The present data suggest that interference of emotion processing by competing task demands is a more general phenomenon extending to the domain of feature-based attention. Furthermore, the results are inconsistent with the notion of effortlessness, i.e., early emotion discrimination despite concurrent task demands. These findings implicate to assess the presumed automatic nature of emotion processing at the level of specific aspects rather than considering automaticity as an all-or-none phenomenon.
Abstract Background Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (~150–300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands. Results Participants successfully performed the primary visual attention task as revealed by behavioral performance and selected event-related potential components (Selection Negativity and P3b). Replicating previous results, emotional modulation of the EPN was observed in a task condition with low processing demands. In contrast, pleasant and unpleasant pictures failed to elicit increased EPN amplitudes compared to neutral images in more difficult explicit attention task conditions. Further analyses determined that even the processing of pleasant and unpleasant pictures high in emotional arousal is subject to interference in experimental conditions with high task demand. Taken together, performing demanding feature-based counting tasks interfered with differential emotion processing indexed by the EPN. Conclusion The present findings demonstrate that taxing processing resources by a competing primary visual attention task markedly attenuated the early discrimination of emotional from neutral picture contents. Thus, these results provide further empirical support for an interference account of the emotion-attention interaction under conditions of competition. Previous studies revealed the interference of selective emotion processing when attentional resources were directed to locations of explicitly task-relevant stimuli. The present data suggest that interference of emotion processing by competing task demands is a more general phenomenon extending to the domain of feature-based attention. Furthermore, the results are inconsistent with the notion of effortlessness, i.e., early emotion discrimination despite concurrent task demands. These findings implicate to assess the presumed automatic nature of emotion processing at the level of specific aspects rather than considering automaticity as an all-or-none phenomenon.
Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (approximately 150-300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands.BACKGROUNDBrain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (approximately 150-300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands.Participants successfully performed the primary visual attention task as revealed by behavioral performance and selected event-related potential components (Selection Negativity and P3b). Replicating previous results, emotional modulation of the EPN was observed in a task condition with low processing demands. In contrast, pleasant and unpleasant pictures failed to elicit increased EPN amplitudes compared to neutral images in more difficult explicit attention task conditions. Further analyses determined that even the processing of pleasant and unpleasant pictures high in emotional arousal is subject to interference in experimental conditions with high task demand. Taken together, performing demanding feature-based counting tasks interfered with differential emotion processing indexed by the EPN.RESULTSParticipants successfully performed the primary visual attention task as revealed by behavioral performance and selected event-related potential components (Selection Negativity and P3b). Replicating previous results, emotional modulation of the EPN was observed in a task condition with low processing demands. In contrast, pleasant and unpleasant pictures failed to elicit increased EPN amplitudes compared to neutral images in more difficult explicit attention task conditions. Further analyses determined that even the processing of pleasant and unpleasant pictures high in emotional arousal is subject to interference in experimental conditions with high task demand. Taken together, performing demanding feature-based counting tasks interfered with differential emotion processing indexed by the EPN.The present findings demonstrate that taxing processing resources by a competing primary visual attention task markedly attenuated the early discrimination of emotional from neutral picture contents. Thus, these results provide further empirical support for an interference account of the emotion-attention interaction under conditions of competition. Previous studies revealed the interference of selective emotion processing when attentional resources were directed to locations of explicitly task-relevant stimuli. The present data suggest that interference of emotion processing by competing task demands is a more general phenomenon extending to the domain of feature-based attention. Furthermore, the results are inconsistent with the notion of effortlessness, i.e., early emotion discrimination despite concurrent task demands. These findings implicate to assess the presumed automatic nature of emotion processing at the level of specific aspects rather than considering automaticity as an all-or-none phenomenon.CONCLUSIONThe present findings demonstrate that taxing processing resources by a competing primary visual attention task markedly attenuated the early discrimination of emotional from neutral picture contents. Thus, these results provide further empirical support for an interference account of the emotion-attention interaction under conditions of competition. Previous studies revealed the interference of selective emotion processing when attentional resources were directed to locations of explicitly task-relevant stimuli. The present data suggest that interference of emotion processing by competing task demands is a more general phenomenon extending to the domain of feature-based attention. Furthermore, the results are inconsistent with the notion of effortlessness, i.e., early emotion discrimination despite concurrent task demands. These findings implicate to assess the presumed automatic nature of emotion processing at the level of specific aspects rather than considering automaticity as an all-or-none phenomenon.
Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images ( similar to 150- 300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands. Results Participants successfully performed the primary visual attention task as revealed by behavioral performance and selected event- related potential components (Selection Negativity and P3b). Replicating previous results, emotional modulation of the EPN was observed in a task condition with low processing demands. In contrast, pleasant and unpleasant pictures failed to elicit increased EPN amplitudes compared to neutral images in more difficult explicit attention task conditions. Further analyses determined that even the processing of pleasant and unpleasant pictures high in emotional arousal is subject to interference in experimental conditions with high task demand. Taken together, performing demanding feature-based counting tasks interfered with differential emotion processing indexed by the EPN. Conclusion The present findings demonstrate that taxing processing resources by a competing primary visual attention task markedly attenuated the early discrimination of emotional from neutral picture contents. Thus, these results provide further empirical support for an interference account of the emotion-attention interaction under conditions of competition. Previous studies revealed the interference of selective emotion processing when attentional resources were directed to locations of explicitly task-relevant stimuli. The present data suggest that interference of emotion processing by competing task demands is a more general phenomenon extending to the domain of feature-based attention. Furthermore, the results are inconsistent with the notion of effortlessness, i.e., early emotion discrimination despite concurrent task demands. These findings implicate to assess the presumed automatic nature of emotion processing at the level of specific aspects rather than considering automaticity as an all- or-none phenomenon.
BACKGROUND: Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (~150-300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands. RESULTS: Participants successfully performed the primary visual attention task as revealed by behavioral performance and selected event-related potential components (Selection Negativity and P3b). Replicating previous results, emotional modulation of the EPN was observed in a task condition with low processing demands. In contrast, pleasant and unpleasant pictures failed to elicit increased EPN amplitudes compared to neutral images in more difficult explicit attention task conditions. Further analyses determined that even the processing of pleasant and unpleasant pictures high in emotional arousal is subject to interference in experimental conditions with high task demand. Taken together, performing demanding feature-based counting tasks interfered with differential emotion processing indexed by the EPN. CONCLUSION: The present findings demonstrate that taxing processing resources by a competing primary visual attention task markedly attenuated the early discrimination of emotional from neutral picture contents. Thus, these results provide further empirical support for an interference account of the emotion-attention interaction under conditions of competition. Previous studies revealed the interference of selective emotion processing when attentional resources were directed to locations of explicitly task-relevant stimuli. The present data suggest that interference of emotion processing by competing task demands is a more general phenomenon extending to the domain of feature-based attention. Furthermore, the results are inconsistent with the notion of effortlessness, i.e., early emotion discrimination despite concurrent task demands. These findings implicate to assess the presumed automatic nature of emotion processing at the level of specific aspects rather than considering automaticity as an all-or-none phenomenon.
ArticleNumber 16
Author Stockburger, Jessica
Schupp, Harald T
Junghöfer, Markus
Hamm, Alfons O
Bublatzky, Florian
Weike, Almut I
AuthorAffiliation 3 Department of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Germany
2 Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, Münster University Hospital, Germany
1 Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 3 Department of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Germany
– name: 1 Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany
– name: 2 Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, Münster University Hospital, Germany
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Harald T
  surname: Schupp
  fullname: Schupp, Harald T
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jessica
  surname: Stockburger
  fullname: Stockburger, Jessica
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Florian
  surname: Bublatzky
  fullname: Bublatzky, Florian
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Markus
  surname: Junghöfer
  fullname: Junghöfer, Markus
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Almut I
  surname: Weike
  fullname: Weike, Almut I
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Alfons O
  surname: Hamm
  fullname: Hamm, Alfons O
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17316444$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkk1v1DAQhi1URNuFK0eUE7cUj-1NnAtSVRWoVIkL3JAsf0x2XSXxYnvL8u9xuqV0QRUnWzPvPJqP95QcTWFCQl4DPQOQzTsQLdSMUVbLGppn5OQhcPTof0xOU7qhFFop2AtyDC2HRghxQr5d7jaDtz5XOmecsg9T5aeMsceIqfrh87pKOKDN_hYrHMOdYhODxZT8tCriar0d9VThLkedcvQ6Y2VDzLh7SZ73ekj46v5dkK8fLr9cfKqvP3-8uji_rs1S8FxLxi0TXPMGrNSUNYIBY6LnbGm4M2WItgHeOeBCWKRo-iVlrBN9x6xxruMLcrXnuqBv1Cb6UcefKmiv7gIhrpSO2dsBlegogHauF8YJ2zkj-6ZtpQUrnDUaCuv9nrXZmhGdLTuJejiAHmYmv1arcKtAUimapgDO9wDjwxOAw4wNo5ovpeZLKalgZry9byKG71tMWY0-WRwGPWHYJtVSxlsK3X-F0JXN8XLuBXnzeKyHdn47oQjO9gIbQ0oR-z8Sqmar_duj-KuguEjP9ihT-eGpsl8CZdkS
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2016_03_020
crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nsaa098
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neulet_2010_04_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neulet_2023_137498
crossref_primary_10_5762_KAIS_2013_14_10_5003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2021_108056
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13415_013_0173_7
crossref_primary_10_1177_17470218221075146
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0037186
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2009_10_076
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2010_11_001
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13415_022_00998_x
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0109070
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2024_09_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2010_06_074
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2019_03_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2011_06_005
crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nst171
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0035767
crossref_primary_10_1177_17470218241311202
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neulet_2020_135545
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8986_2010_01062_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_BF03076419
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8986_2010_01041_x
crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nsq066
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpsycho_2022_11_006
crossref_primary_10_1080_09541440903427487
crossref_primary_10_12677_AP_2017_75079
crossref_primary_10_1027_0269_8803_a000030
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandc_2018_04_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpsycho_2011_12_005
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2018_00382
crossref_primary_10_1080_02699930801987504
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2020_107529
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2008_07_024
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_023_01852_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2007_11_006
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8986_2007_00600_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2022_108310
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2022_108399
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2018_00708
crossref_primary_10_3758_CABN_9_2_168
crossref_primary_10_1097_WNR_0b013e32832b02fe
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2008_03_004
crossref_primary_10_1093_cercor_bhv130
crossref_primary_10_1093_cercor_bhr250
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0230775
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8986_2010_01130_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpsycho_2014_05_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_braindev_2008_04_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2008_12_012
crossref_primary_10_1080_17470919_2024_2365172
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2023_108785
crossref_primary_10_4306_pi_2013_10_2_164
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2013_06_005
crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nsx001
crossref_primary_10_1080_13506285_2025_2451368
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8986_2007_00638_x
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2014_01351
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pmedr_2018_10_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2017_03_017
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2018_05_025
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandl_2013_02_008
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_022_01756_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2021_07_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2018_01_021
crossref_primary_10_1024_1016_264X_19_2_91
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2013_05_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2024_02_003
crossref_primary_10_1097_WNR_0000000000000227
crossref_primary_10_1111_psyp_13585
crossref_primary_10_1155_2017_5282670
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2019_06_040
crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_2008_21151
crossref_primary_10_1093_texcom_tgaa040
crossref_primary_10_12677_ASS_2024_133195
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2202_14_139
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2012_04_021
crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nsp033
crossref_primary_10_1111_psyp_12809
crossref_primary_10_1111_psyp_13819
Cites_doi 10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.276
10.1038/sj.mp.4000812
10.1017/S0048577299971135
10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56008-X
10.1080/02699930341000239
10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00214-8
10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00092-2
10.1038/nn1549
10.1093/cercor/bhh023
10.1111/j.1464-8986.2006.00386.x
10.1111/1469-8986.3820175
10.1073/pnas.172403899
10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00075-6
10.1097/01.wnr.0000198437.59883.bb
10.1038/30976
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2032-05.2005
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-10-06846.1995
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.011
10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.189
10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.028
10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483
10.1097/00001756-200306110-00002
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00174.x
10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.839
10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01852-0
10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127
10.1038/381520a0
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-13-05627.2003
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.015
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.018
10.1111/1469-8986.3740523
10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011
10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00268-9
10.1037/0735-7044.117.2.369
10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004
10.1111/1467-9280.00490
10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.451
10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1656
10.1111/1467-9280.01411
10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56007-8
10.1097/01.wnr.0000203355.88061.c6
10.1007/BF01190389
10.1073/pnas.96.4.1680
10.1017/S0048577299970634
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2007 Schupp et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007 Schupp et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2007 Schupp et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007 Schupp et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7TK
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-8-16
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals (Roanoke)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic
Neurosciences Abstracts

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1471-2202
EndPage 16
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_49011addf4bd4c9db8f6778c1c4dcba1
PMC1808466
oai_biomedcentral_com_1471_2202_8_16
17316444
10_1186_1471_2202_8_16
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
123
23N
2VQ
2WC
4.4
53G
5VS
6J9
6PF
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABIVO
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACMJI
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BFQNJ
BMC
C1A
C6C
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
H13
HYE
IAO
IGS
IHR
INH
INR
IPNFZ
IPY
ITC
KQ8
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
RBZ
RIG
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
U2A
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
-A0
ACRMQ
ADINQ
C24
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
NXXTH
7TK
7X8
ABVAZ
AFGXO
AFNRJ
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-b543t-823c243a361c8a026421224f325b3db47176139d1344ce0ebf502294f92cbdd93
IEDL.DBID RBZ
ISSN 1471-2202
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:28:44 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 13:56:55 EDT 2025
Wed May 22 07:11:41 EDT 2024
Fri Jul 11 15:24:26 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 23:14:22 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:12:35 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:25:47 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:50:47 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b543t-823c243a361c8a026421224f325b3db47176139d1344ce0ebf502294f92cbdd93
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-16
PMID 17316444
PQID 19613317
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_49011addf4bd4c9db8f6778c1c4dcba1
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1808466
biomedcentral_primary_oai_biomedcentral_com_1471_2202_8_16
proquest_miscellaneous_70237019
proquest_miscellaneous_19613317
pubmed_primary_17316444
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2202_8_16
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_1471_2202_8_16
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2007-02-22
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2007-02-22
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2007
  text: 2007-02-22
  day: 22
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC neuroscience
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Neurosci
PublicationYear 2007
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References C Kranczioch (314_CR51) 2003; 17
A Öhman (314_CR2) 2000
PJ Lang (314_CR1) 1997
RM Shiffrin (314_CR16) 1977; 84
KL Duckworth (314_CR37) 2002; 13
L Pessoa (314_CR21) 2002; 99
HG Smid (314_CR26) 1999; 36
N Lavie (314_CR32) 2005; 9
AK Anderson (314_CR22) 2003; 23
HT Schupp (314_CR11) 2004; 41
KS LaBar (314_CR42) 1995; 15
MM Bradley (314_CR5) 2003; 117
O Hauk (314_CR35) 2004; 21
EK Vogel (314_CR50) 1998; 24
M Junghöfer (314_CR48) 2000; 37
A Holmes (314_CR24) 2003; 16
PJ Lang (314_CR25) 2005
D Sabatinelli (314_CR7) 2005; 24
N Lavie (314_CR31) 1995; 21
MI Posner (314_CR15) 1975
JA Bargh (314_CR19) 1989
S Moratti (314_CR41) 2006; 43
JS Morris (314_CR39) 1998; 393
M Junghöfer (314_CR36) 2006; 156
A Öhman (314_CR34) 2001; 108
J Globisch (314_CR38) 1999; 36
R Johnson Jr (314_CR30) 1988
HT Schupp (314_CR47) 2004; 18
MM Bradley (314_CR46) 2001; 1
M Junghöfer (314_CR6) 2005; 25
HT Schupp (314_CR10) 2003; 14
HT Schupp (314_CR17) 2003; 14
G Pourtois (314_CR23) 2004; 14
M Junghöfer (314_CR9) 2001; 38
HT Schupp (314_CR13) 2004; 4
C Keysers (314_CR33) 2002; 6
M Davis (314_CR44) 2001; 6
JT Cacioppo (314_CR45) 1999; 76
J Kissler (314_CR14) 2006; 156
M Junghöfer (314_CR8) 2006; 17
JS Morris (314_CR40) 1999; 96
MJ Wieser (314_CR12) 2006; 1096
GF Potts (314_CR27) 2001; 11
DM Tucker (314_CR4) 2000
S Thorpe (314_CR28) 1996; 381
P Vuilleumier (314_CR3) 2005; 9
HT Schupp (314_CR18) 2006; 17
L Pessoa (314_CR20) 2002; 15
314_CR29
AI Weike (314_CR43) 2005; 25
C Sergent (314_CR52) 2005; 8
M Junghöfer (314_CR49) 1997; 9
10194973 - Psychophysiology. 1999 Mar;36(2):264-79
16750819 - Brain Res. 2006 Jun 22;1096(1):138-47
16319311 - J Neurosci. 2005 Nov 30;25(48):11117-24
15102130 - Psychophysiology. 2004 May;41(3):441-9
7472442 - J Neurosci. 1995 Oct;15(10):6846-55
12177449 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20;99(17):11458-63
15670706 - Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 15;24(4):1265-70
7790827 - J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):451-68
10934911 - Psychophysiology. 2000 Jul;37(4):523-32
16712592 - Psychophysiology. 2006 Mar;43(2):216-26
12843265 - J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 2;23(13):5627-33
12668225 - Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Apr;16(2):174-84
17015079 - Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:147-83
9624001 - Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):467-70
15784431 - Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 1;25(2):520-6
10098381 - Psychophysiology. 1999 Jan;36(1):66-75
12708533 - Behav Neurosci. 2003 Apr;117(2):369-80
12433381 - Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Dec;15(1):31-45
17015078 - Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:123-43
16750397 - Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 15;32(2):583-91
11244481 - Mol Psychiatry. 2001 Jan;6(1):13-34
11347862 - Psychophysiology. 2001 Mar;38(2):175-8
9104831 - Brain Topogr. 1997 Spring;9(3):203-17
12430834 - Psychol Sci. 2002 Nov;13(6):513-9
16158062 - Nat Neurosci. 2005 Oct;8(10):1391-400
12763203 - Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jun;17(1):177-87
11240117 - Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Mar;11(1):147-56
15054077 - Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jun;14(6):619-33
9861716 - J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Dec;24(6):1656-74
11488376 - Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):483-522
9990084 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1680-5
15668100 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):75-82
16407776 - Neuroreport. 2006 Feb 6;17(2):225-9
15222855 - Emotion. 2004 Jun;4(2):189-200
16514360 - Neuroreport. 2006 Mar 20;17(4):365-9
8632824 - Nature. 1996 Jun 6;381(6582):520-2
12564747 - Psychol Sci. 2003 Jan;14(1):7-13
15050585 - Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1612-21
12821791 - Neuroreport. 2003 Jun 11;14(8):1107-10
11861189 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Mar 1;6(3):120-125
16289871 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Dec;9(12):585-94
12934687 - Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):276-98
References_xml – volume: 1
  start-page: 276
  issue: 3
  year: 2001
  ident: 314_CR46
  publication-title: Emotion
  doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.276
– volume: 6
  start-page: 13
  issue: 1
  year: 2001
  ident: 314_CR44
  publication-title: Molecular Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000812
– volume: 36
  start-page: 264
  issue: 2
  year: 1999
  ident: 314_CR26
  publication-title: Psychophysiology
  doi: 10.1017/S0048577299971135
– start-page: 69
  volume-title: Advances in Psychophysiology
  year: 1988
  ident: 314_CR30
– volume: 156
  start-page: 147
  year: 2006
  ident: 314_CR14
  publication-title: Progress in Brain Research
  doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56008-X
– volume: 18
  start-page: 593
  issue: 5
  year: 2004
  ident: 314_CR47
  publication-title: Cognition and Emotion
  doi: 10.1080/02699930341000239
– volume: 15
  start-page: 31
  issue: 1
  year: 2002
  ident: 314_CR20
  publication-title: Cognitive Brain Research
  doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00214-8
– volume: 17
  start-page: 177
  issue: 1
  year: 2003
  ident: 314_CR51
  publication-title: Cognitive Brain Research
  doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00092-2
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1391
  issue: 10
  year: 2005
  ident: 314_CR52
  publication-title: Nature Neuroscience
  doi: 10.1038/nn1549
– start-page: 56
  volume-title: The neuropsychology of emotion
  year: 2000
  ident: 314_CR4
– volume: 14
  start-page: 619
  issue: 6
  year: 2004
  ident: 314_CR23
  publication-title: Cerebral Cortex
  doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh023
– volume: 43
  start-page: 216
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  ident: 314_CR41
  publication-title: Psychophysiology
  doi: 10.1111/j.1464-8986.2006.00386.x
– ident: 314_CR29
– volume: 38
  start-page: 175
  issue: 2
  year: 2001
  ident: 314_CR9
  publication-title: Psychophysiology
  doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3820175
– volume: 99
  start-page: 11458
  issue: 17
  year: 2002
  ident: 314_CR21
  publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.172403899
– volume: 11
  start-page: 147
  issue: 1
  year: 2001
  ident: 314_CR27
  publication-title: Cognitive Brain Research
  doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00075-6
– volume: 17
  start-page: 225
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  ident: 314_CR8
  publication-title: NeuroReport
  doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000198437.59883.bb
– volume: 393
  start-page: 467
  issue: 6684
  year: 1998
  ident: 314_CR39
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/30976
– volume: 25
  start-page: 11117
  issue: 48
  year: 2005
  ident: 314_CR43
  publication-title: Journal of Neuroscience
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2032-05.2005
– volume: 15
  start-page: 6846
  issue: 10
  year: 1995
  ident: 314_CR42
  publication-title: Journal of Neuroscience
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-10-06846.1995
– volume: 25
  start-page: 520
  issue: 2
  year: 2005
  ident: 314_CR6
  publication-title: NeuroImage
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.011
– start-page: 296
  volume-title: Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion
  year: 2000
  ident: 314_CR2
– start-page: 3
  volume-title: Unintended thought
  year: 1989
  ident: 314_CR19
– volume: 4
  start-page: 189
  issue: 2
  year: 2004
  ident: 314_CR13
  publication-title: Emotion
  doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.189
– start-page: 55
  volume-title: Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposion
  year: 1975
  ident: 314_CR15
– volume-title: International affective picture system (IAPS): Digitized photographs, instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report A-6
  year: 2005
  ident: 314_CR25
– volume: 1096
  start-page: 138
  issue: 1
  year: 2006
  ident: 314_CR12
  publication-title: Brain Research
  doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.028
– volume: 108
  start-page: 483
  issue: 3
  year: 2001
  ident: 314_CR34
  publication-title: Psychological Review
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1107
  issue: 8
  year: 2003
  ident: 314_CR17
  publication-title: Neuroreport
  doi: 10.1097/00001756-200306110-00002
– volume: 41
  start-page: 441
  issue: 3
  year: 2004
  ident: 314_CR11
  publication-title: Psychophysiology
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00174.x
– volume: 76
  start-page: 839
  year: 1999
  ident: 314_CR45
  publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.839
– volume: 6
  start-page: 120
  issue: 3
  year: 2002
  ident: 314_CR33
  publication-title: Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01852-0
– volume: 84
  start-page: 125
  year: 1977
  ident: 314_CR16
  publication-title: Psychological Review
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127
– volume: 381
  start-page: 520
  issue: 6582
  year: 1996
  ident: 314_CR28
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/381520a0
– volume: 23
  start-page: 5627
  issue: 13
  year: 2003
  ident: 314_CR22
  publication-title: Journal of Neuroscience
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-13-05627.2003
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1265
  issue: 4
  year: 2005
  ident: 314_CR7
  publication-title: NeuroImage
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.015
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1612
  issue: 4
  year: 2004
  ident: 314_CR35
  publication-title: NeuroImage
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.018
– volume: 37
  start-page: 523
  issue: 4
  year: 2000
  ident: 314_CR48
  publication-title: Psychophysiology
  doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3740523
– volume: 9
  start-page: 585
  issue: 12
  year: 2005
  ident: 314_CR3
  publication-title: Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011
– volume: 16
  start-page: 174
  issue: 2
  year: 2003
  ident: 314_CR24
  publication-title: Cognitive Brain Research
  doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00268-9
– volume: 117
  start-page: 369
  issue: 2
  year: 2003
  ident: 314_CR5
  publication-title: Behavioral Neuroscience
  doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.2.369
– volume: 9
  start-page: 75
  issue: 2
  year: 2005
  ident: 314_CR32
  publication-title: Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004
– volume: 13
  start-page: 513
  issue: 6
  year: 2002
  ident: 314_CR37
  publication-title: Psychological Science
  doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00490
– volume: 21
  start-page: 451
  issue: 3
  year: 1995
  ident: 314_CR31
  publication-title: Journal of Experimantal Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
  doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.451
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1656
  issue: 6
  year: 1998
  ident: 314_CR50
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
  doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1656
– volume: 14
  start-page: 7
  issue: 1
  year: 2003
  ident: 314_CR10
  publication-title: Psychological Science
  doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.01411
– volume: 156
  start-page: 123
  year: 2006
  ident: 314_CR36
  publication-title: Progress in Brain Research
  doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56007-8
– volume: 17
  start-page: 365
  issue: 4
  year: 2006
  ident: 314_CR18
  publication-title: Neuroreport
  doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000203355.88061.c6
– volume: 9
  start-page: 203
  issue: 4
  year: 1997
  ident: 314_CR49
  publication-title: Brain Topography
  doi: 10.1007/BF01190389
– volume: 96
  start-page: 1680
  issue: 4
  year: 1999
  ident: 314_CR40
  publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1680
– start-page: 97
  volume-title: Attention and Emotion: Sensory and Motivational Processes
  year: 1997
  ident: 314_CR1
– volume: 36
  start-page: 66
  issue: 1
  year: 1999
  ident: 314_CR38
  publication-title: Psychophysiology
  doi: 10.1017/S0048577299970634
– reference: 16407776 - Neuroreport. 2006 Feb 6;17(2):225-9
– reference: 15054077 - Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jun;14(6):619-33
– reference: 16289871 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Dec;9(12):585-94
– reference: 9990084 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1680-5
– reference: 12668225 - Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Apr;16(2):174-84
– reference: 16319311 - J Neurosci. 2005 Nov 30;25(48):11117-24
– reference: 12708533 - Behav Neurosci. 2003 Apr;117(2):369-80
– reference: 11244481 - Mol Psychiatry. 2001 Jan;6(1):13-34
– reference: 12177449 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20;99(17):11458-63
– reference: 15670706 - Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 15;24(4):1265-70
– reference: 10098381 - Psychophysiology. 1999 Jan;36(1):66-75
– reference: 9861716 - J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Dec;24(6):1656-74
– reference: 9104831 - Brain Topogr. 1997 Spring;9(3):203-17
– reference: 15050585 - Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1612-21
– reference: 12763203 - Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jun;17(1):177-87
– reference: 15668100 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):75-82
– reference: 8632824 - Nature. 1996 Jun 6;381(6582):520-2
– reference: 11240117 - Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Mar;11(1):147-56
– reference: 15222855 - Emotion. 2004 Jun;4(2):189-200
– reference: 17015078 - Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:123-43
– reference: 12564747 - Psychol Sci. 2003 Jan;14(1):7-13
– reference: 7472442 - J Neurosci. 1995 Oct;15(10):6846-55
– reference: 10934911 - Psychophysiology. 2000 Jul;37(4):523-32
– reference: 16750819 - Brain Res. 2006 Jun 22;1096(1):138-47
– reference: 16750397 - Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 15;32(2):583-91
– reference: 10194973 - Psychophysiology. 1999 Mar;36(2):264-79
– reference: 16158062 - Nat Neurosci. 2005 Oct;8(10):1391-400
– reference: 17015079 - Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:147-83
– reference: 9624001 - Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):467-70
– reference: 12821791 - Neuroreport. 2003 Jun 11;14(8):1107-10
– reference: 11488376 - Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):483-522
– reference: 16712592 - Psychophysiology. 2006 Mar;43(2):216-26
– reference: 7790827 - J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):451-68
– reference: 15784431 - Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 1;25(2):520-6
– reference: 11347862 - Psychophysiology. 2001 Mar;38(2):175-8
– reference: 12433381 - Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Dec;15(1):31-45
– reference: 16514360 - Neuroreport. 2006 Mar 20;17(4):365-9
– reference: 12430834 - Psychol Sci. 2002 Nov;13(6):513-9
– reference: 12934687 - Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):276-98
– reference: 15102130 - Psychophysiology. 2004 May;41(3):441-9
– reference: 12843265 - J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 2;23(13):5627-33
– reference: 11861189 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Mar 1;6(3):120-125
SSID ssj0017842
Score 2.1522434
Snippet Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection...
BACKGROUND: Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A...
Abstract Background Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
biomedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 16
SubjectTerms Adult
Attention - physiology
Brain Mapping
Cues
Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology
Emotions - physiology
Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology
Female
Humans
Male
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Visual Cortex - physiology
Volition - physiology
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals (Roanoke)
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1BT90wDI4mDmiXaQO2dQzIAYlTxEvipuluA4EQEpxA4oAUNUmjTUIFvVek_XzstA8oG9qF21Nr9aWJHduN_X2M7c4S9VfqKNDVJUxQqkbYEiohNQ5bWQMpF4-fnZuTSzi9Kq-eUX1RTdgADzxM3D5QbyQaYQIfIdTR20SYZ0EGiME3OfFBn7dMpsbzg8pm2hyJW69Qimp4MlyjtGb_8ZrA9Mm86HO_mbinjOL_r9DzZQXlM5d0_JF9GGNJ_nN4h0_sXdutsdWz8bR8nV1TgR3-7jmBaOayRk7wEHPq8Vtw-gTLF5kHB7c83g6EPvxuaB1Al4bCPHP4cdzB501m-OhbHqg-988Guzw-ujg8ESObgvAl6F5YpYMC3Wgjg20w9aKzYAVJq9Lr6HFWKnTtdZQaILSz1qcS_XsNqVbBx1jrz2ylu-3ar4xHGyt8aMLoJ4H1mCFag54wJQymQlOqgv2YTKq7G5AzHGFZT--gWTlaEUcr4qyTpmBiuQIujDjlRJdx43K-Ys1f8nuP8sv_eU3ygBZ0Mpp8AfXNjfrm_qdvBdtZqoNDS6TjlaZrb-8XDvcyTPhl9bpEhQESwd8X7MugPk8DJgIxAChYNVGsyVind7rfvzIauLQzjCHNt7d4uU32fvh2rdBCvrOVfn7fbmHQ1fvtbF8PKV4rhg
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3di9QwEA96gvginp_VO82D4FN1k0zTVDhExeMQ1icX7kEITdJ4wtI9uz04_3tn0u6tvY8330o7bdMkk5lpZn4_xl7PItVXqpCjqYsYoJR1bgooc6Gw2dJoiCl5fP5NHy3g63FxvM1_GjtwfW1oR3xSi2759vz3nw-o8AdJ4Y1-J3CBzaUk1c6Fvs3uoFUqicZhDtsdhdIkIp0L2RHA8er9lyrflxODlXD9r3NGL-dU_mOkDh-w-6N3yT8O02GX3Wrah-zufNw_f8R-UModHvecYDVToiMnwIiOqv7WnH7K8nVixsFFkDcDxQ8_HYoJ0MihME-sfhzX9K5OnB99wz1l7J4_ZovDL98_H-Ujv0LuClB9bqTyElSttPCmxmCMdoclRCULp4LDXinR2FdBKADfzBoXC7T4FcRKehdCpZ6wnXbVNs8YDyaU-NCI_lAE4zBmNBptY4zoXvm6kBl7P-lUezpgaVhCt55eQUWzNCKWRsQaK3TG8s0IWD8ilxOBxtKmCMboK_JvLuQ377lJ8hMN6KQ16cSq-2lH1bVA1bloBiK4AL4KzkRC3fPCQ_CuFhl7tZkOFnWTNlzqtlmdrS2ubkKhg3azRIkuEwHiZ-zpMH22DSZKMQDIWDmZWJO2Tq-0v04SPrgwM_Qq9fP_8XEv2L3hb7ZEDdljO3131uyjG9a7l0m__gI3ljFX
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17316444
https://www.proquest.com/docview/19613317
https://www.proquest.com/docview/70237019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-16
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC1808466
https://doaj.org/article/49011addf4bd4c9db8f6778c1c4dcba1
Volume 8
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9swEBdbC2MvY92nuzbTw2BPZpF0tuS-pWOlBLKHbYUyBsKSLFYobklc2J-_O9lJ63R92ksI8SUROt2X7u53jH2YRuqvVCFHUxcxQNF1bgrQuVC4bGlKiKl4fPG1PD2D-XlxfnvfsZXBF6b8JFB95lKS4OaifMx2JWigIQ3fjn9u8gXapDE5G9oBnvH-97f62i9H5iih9v_L1dyumLxjgk6es2eD78hnPbP32KOmfcGeLIbs-Ev2iwrq8H3HCTQzlTFygoNYUk_fitOVK1-luTeo4njTD_Dh132rAJowJOZpZh9Hjb2s00SPruGe6nH_vGJnJ19-fD7Nh-kJuStAdbmRyktQtSqFNzWGWpT7lRCVLJwKDndFoymvglAAvpk2LhZozyuIlfQuhEq9ZjvtVdu8ZTyYoPFHI3o7EYzDiNCUaPliROfJ14XM2NFoU-11j5RhCbt6_ATFyBJHLHHEGivKjOVrDlg_4JLTeIxLm-ITU96j_7ihX__PQ5THxNDRatIHeLzsIJgWqPcWlXwEF8BXwZlImHpeeAje1SJj79fHwaLkUTqlbpurm5VF3YUBvtAPU2h0iAjuPmNv-uNzu2AaGAYAGdOjgzVa6_hJe_E7oX8LM0Wfsdz_nz1_x572d9QSJeOA7XTLm-YQnavOTdjubDb_Pp-kywl8XYCZJFn7Cw1dJRg
linkProvider BioMedCentral
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELagSMAF8Sa86gMSJ8P6kdjhRhHVAt0eUCtVCMmKXwVpyVa7qcTPZ8bJLpuWnrhFySQZeTwP2zPfEPJqkrC-UgYGri7BAkU3zJRKMy6BbWEqlXLy-Oywmh6rzyflyQAphLUw7pffAnKMb7aL0OfZcq8Txnp9N9VbDvaVCYGazXh1ndzQZalRR7_ufdscKGiT--hsaAf8xsvvXyh8n4_8VYb1_1csejGlcstH7d8ld4bgkr7veb9HrsX2Prk5G47PH5DvmHEH1x1FVM2c50gRL2KJRX8rinuydJUb44ANpLHv8EPP-loC8HFATHNTPwomfdnklh9dpB4Tdn8_JMf7H48-TNnQXoG5UsmOGSG9ULKRFfemgbUYHg4LlaQonQwORkWDr68Dl0r5OIkuleDwa5Vq4V0ItXxEdtpFG58QGkzQ8NEE4VBSxsGS0VTgGlOC6Mo3pSjIu9Gg2rMeSsMiuPX4CYjYokQsSsQay6uCsLUErB-Ay7F_xtzmBYypLtG_3tCv_3MV5R4KdMRNvrFYntphnlmFxbngBZJyQfk6OJMQdM9zr4J3DS_I7no6WFBNPG9p2rg4X1kwblxCfHY1hYaICfHwC_K4nz5_GcaOYkqpgujRxBrxOn7S_vyR4cG5mUBQWT39nzHfJbemR7MDe_Dp8Mszcrvf0BagJc_JTrc8jy8gEuvcy6xjfwA1sTI2
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELagSBUXxJvwqg9InEzXjzgONwqsyqMVBypVCMmKX4BYsqvdVOLnM-Nkl01LT9yiZJJYHs_LnvmGkGeThPWVMjAwdQkClKphplQV4xKGLYxWKSePHx3rwxP1_rQ8HfKfsBbG_fJbQI7xxXYR-ixrbrjwP_cXIfUCb_Q-BwXLhEDRZlxfJdcqxJXCyP3gy-ZEoTK5kc6GdgBwvPj-ucr32chgZVz_fzmj53Mqt4zU9Ca5MXiX9FW_HG6RK7G9TXaPhvPzO-QrptzBdUcRVjMnOlIEjFhi1d-K4qYsXeXOOKAEaexb_NBFX0wARg6Iae7qR0GnL5vc86OL1GPG7u-75GT69vPrQzb0V2CuVLJjRkgvlGyk5t40EIzh6bBQSYrSyeBgViow9nXgUikfJ9GlEix-rVItvAuhlvfITjtv4wNCgwkVfDSBP5SUcRAzGg22MSVwr3xTioK8HE2qXfRYGhbRrcdPgMcWOWKRI9ZYrgvC1hywfkAuxwYaM5sjGKMv0D_f0K__cxnlATJ0NJp8Y778ZgfRtQqrc8EMJOWC8nVwJiHqnudeBe8aXpC99XKwIJt44NK0cX62sqDduAQH7XKKClwmBMQvyP1--fwdMLYUU0oVpBotrNFYx0_aH98zPjg3E_Aq9cP_mfM9svvpzdR-fHf84RG53m9oCxCSx2SnW57FJ-CJde5pFrE_p0EyAQ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Explicit+attention+interferes+with+selective+emotion+processing+in+human+extrastriate+cortex&rft.jtitle=BMC+neuroscience&rft.au=Jungh%C3%B6fer+Markus&rft.au=Bublatzky+Florian&rft.au=Stockburger+Jessica&rft.au=Schupp+Harald+T&rft.date=2007-02-22&rft.pub=BMC&rft.issn=1471-2202&rft.eissn=1471-2202&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1471-2202-8-16&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_49011addf4bd4c9db8f6778c1c4dcba1
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2202&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2202&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2202&client=summon