Identification of Suitable Site-specific Recharge Areas using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) Technique: A Case Study of Iranshahr Basin (Iran)

• Published in: Air, soil and water research Vol. 15; no. 1
• Main Authors: Zaresefat, Mojtaba, Ahrari, Mohiuddin, Reza Shoaei, Gholam, Etemadifar, Mahin, Aghamolaie, Iman, Derakhshani, Reza
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Sage UK: London, England SAGE Publications 01.01.2022; Sage Publications Ltd; SAGE Publishing
• Subjects: Analytic hierarchy process; Aquifers; Artificial recharge; Drawdown; Drought; FAHP fuzzy logic model; Fuzzy logic; Geology; GIS; Groundwater; Groundwater recharge; Iranshahr plain; Land use; Literature reviews; Mathematical models; Original Research; Parameters; Rainfall; Recharge areas; Soil layers; Transmissivity; Water quality; Water resources; GIS; FAHP fuzzy logic model; Iranshahr plain; Artificial recharge
• DOI: 10.1177/11786221211063849
• ISSN: 1178-6221

Iranshahr Basin is located in the Sistan and Baluchistan province, subject to severe drought and excessive groundwater utilization. Over-reliance on groundwater resources in this area has led to aquifer drawdowns and socio-economic problems. The present study aimed to identify appropriate sites for Artificial Recharge Groundwater (ARG) in a single platform by applying GIS fuzzy logic spatial modeling. Three stages were performed. In stage one, nine factors affecting ARG were collected based on the literature review. In stage two, geology, soil, and land-use layers were digitized from the existing maps. Some layers such as rainfall, unsaturated thickness, water quality, and transmissivity data were imported to ArcGIS environments, and their surface maps were made by Ordinary Kriging (OK) method. In stage three, the parameters were standardized with the fuzzy membership functions, and the GAMMA 0.5 fuzzy overlay model was applied for aggregation parameters. Results showed that 72.8%, 16.7%, 7.7%, 2.5% of the areas were classified as unsuitable, moderate, suitable, and perfectly suitable sites for planning a groundwater recharge site. Subsequently, the minimum area required regarding the possible errors based on the literature review determined six sites (A–E) as areas with higher priority. Then, the recommended unsuitable/suitable sites were validated and omitted by using some more detailed views. Finally, two sites (E and F) were omitted, and four sites (A, B, C, D) were recommended for future artificial recharge planning.