Mammostrat as a tool to stratify breast cancer patients at risk of recurrence during endocrine therapy

Patients with early-stage breast cancer, treated with endocrine therapy, have approximately 90% 5-year disease-free survival. However, for patients at higher risk of relapse despite endocrine therapy, additional adjuvant therapy, such as chemotherapy, may be indicated. The challenge is to prospectiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBreast cancer research : BCR Vol. 12; no. 4; p. R47
Main Authors Bartlett, John M S, Thomas, Jeremy, Ross, Douglas T, Seitz, Robert S, Ring, Brian Z, Beck, Rodney A, Pedersen, Hans Christian, Munro, Alison, Kunkler, Ian H, Campbell, Fiona M, Jack, Wilma, Kerr, Gillian R, Johnstone, Laura, Cameron, David A, Chetty, Udi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 01.01.2010
National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts
BioMed Central
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Patients with early-stage breast cancer, treated with endocrine therapy, have approximately 90% 5-year disease-free survival. However, for patients at higher risk of relapse despite endocrine therapy, additional adjuvant therapy, such as chemotherapy, may be indicated. The challenge is to prospectively identify such patients. The Mammostrat® test uses five immunohistochemical markers to stratify patients on tamoxifen therapy into risk groups to inform treatment decisions. We tested the efficacy of this panel in a mixed population of cases treated in a single center with breast-conserving surgery and long-term follow-up. Tissue microarrays from a consecutive series (1981 to 1998) of 1,812 women managed by wide local excision and postoperative radiotherapy were collected following appropriate ethical review. Of 1,390 cases stained, 197 received no adjuvant hormonal or chemotherapy, 1,044 received tamoxifen only, and 149 received a combination of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. Median age at diagnosis was 57, 71% were postmenopausal, 23.9% were node-positive and median tumor size was 1.5 cm. Samples were stained using triplicate 0.6 mm2 tissue microarray cores, and positivity for p53, HTF9C, CEACAM5, NDRG1 and SLC7A5 was assessed. Each case was assigned a Mammostrat risk score, and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by marker positivity and risk score. Increased Mammostrat scores were significantly associated with reduced DRFS, RFS and OS in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (P < 0.00001). In multivariate analyses the risk score was independent of conventional risk factors for DRFS, RFS and OS (P < 0.05). In node-negative, tamoxifen-treated patients, 10-year recurrence rates were 7.6 ± 1.5% in the low-risk group versus 20.0 ± 4.4% in the high-risk group. Further, exploratory analyses revealed associations with outcome in both ER-negative and untreated patients. This is the fifth independent study providing evidence that Mammostrat can act as an independent prognostic tool for ER-positive, tamoxifen-treated breast cancer. In addition, this study revealed for the first time a possible association with outcome regardless of node status and ER-negative tumors. When viewed in the context of previous results, these data provide further support for this antibody panel as an aid to patient management in early-stage breast cancer.
AbstractList Patients with early-stage breast cancer, treated with endocrine therapy, have approximately 90% 5-year disease-free survival. However, for patients at higher risk of relapse despite endocrine therapy, additional adjuvant therapy, such as chemotherapy, may be indicated. The challenge is to prospectively identify such patients. The Mammostrat® test uses five immunohistochemical markers to stratify patients on tamoxifen therapy into risk groups to inform treatment decisions. We tested the efficacy of this panel in a mixed population of cases treated in a single center with breast-conserving surgery and long-term follow-up. Tissue microarrays from a consecutive series (1981 to 1998) of 1,812 women managed by wide local excision and postoperative radiotherapy were collected following appropriate ethical review. Of 1,390 cases stained, 197 received no adjuvant hormonal or chemotherapy, 1,044 received tamoxifen only, and 149 received a combination of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. Median age at diagnosis was 57, 71% were postmenopausal, 23.9% were node-positive and median tumor size was 1.5 cm. Samples were stained using triplicate 0.6 mm2 tissue microarray cores, and positivity for p53, HTF9C, CEACAM5, NDRG1 and SLC7A5 was assessed. Each case was assigned a Mammostrat risk score, and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by marker positivity and risk score. Increased Mammostrat scores were significantly associated with reduced DRFS, RFS and OS in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (P < 0.00001). In multivariate analyses the risk score was independent of conventional risk factors for DRFS, RFS and OS (P < 0.05). In node-negative, tamoxifen-treated patients, 10-year recurrence rates were 7.6 ± 1.5% in the low-risk group versus 20.0 ± 4.4% in the high-risk group. Further, exploratory analyses revealed associations with outcome in both ER-negative and untreated patients. This is the fifth independent study providing evidence that Mammostrat can act as an independent prognostic tool for ER-positive, tamoxifen-treated breast cancer. In addition, this study revealed for the first time a possible association with outcome regardless of node status and ER-negative tumors. When viewed in the context of previous results, these data provide further support for this antibody panel as an aid to patient management in early-stage breast cancer.
INTRODUCTION: Patients with early-stage breast cancer, treated with endocrine therapy, have approximately 90% 5-year disease-free survival. However, for patients at higher risk of relapse despite endocrine therapy, additional adjuvant therapy, such as chemotherapy, may be indicated. The challenge is to prospectively identify such patients. The Mammostrat® test uses five immunohistochemical markers to stratify patients on tamoxifen therapy into risk groups to inform treatment decisions. We tested the efficacy of this panel in a mixed population of cases treated in a single center with breast-conserving surgery and long-term follow-up. METHODS: Tissue microarrays from a consecutive series (1981 to 1998) of 1,812 women managed by wide local excision and postoperative radiotherapy were collected following appropriate ethical review. Of 1,390 cases stained, 197 received no adjuvant hormonal or chemotherapy, 1,044 received tamoxifen only, and 149 received a combination of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. Median age at diagnosis was 57, 71% were postmenopausal, 23.9% were node-positive and median tumor size was 1.5 cm. Samples were stained using triplicate 0.6 mm2 tissue microarray cores, and positivity for p53, HTF9C, CEACAM5, NDRG1 and SLC7A5 was assessed. Each case was assigned a Mammostrat® risk score, and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by marker positivity and risk score. RESULTS: Increased Mammostrat® scores were significantly associated with reduced DRFS, RFS and OS in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (P < 0.00001). In multivariate analyses the risk score was independent of conventional risk factors for DRFS, RFS and OS (P < 0.05). In node-negative, tamoxifen-treated patients, 10-year recurrence rates were 7.6 ± 1.5% in the low-risk group versus 20.0 ± 4.4% in the high-risk group. Further, exploratory analyses revealed associations with outcome in both ER-negative and untreated patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the fifth independent study providing evidence that Mammostrat® can act as an independent prognostic tool for ER-positive, tamoxifen-treated breast cancer. In addition, this study revealed for the first time a possible association with outcome regardless of node status and ER-negative tumors. When viewed in the context of previous results, these data provide further support for this antibody panel as an aid to patient management in early-stage breast cancer.
Tissue microarrays from a consecutive series (1981 to 1998) of 1,812 women managed by wide local excision and postoperative radiotherapy were collected following appropriate ethical review. Of 1,390 cases stained, 197 received no adjuvant hormonal or chemotherapy, 1,044 received tamoxifen only, and 149 received a combination of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. Median age at diagnosis was 57, 71% were postmenopausal, 23.9% were node-positive and median tumor size was 1.5 cm. Samples were stained using triplicate 0.6 mm.sup.2 tissue microarray cores, and positivity for p53, HTF9C, CEACAM5, NDRG1 and SLC7A5 was assessed. Each case was assigned a Mammostrat.sup.[R] risk score, and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by marker positivity and risk score. Increased Mammostrat.sup.[R] scores were significantly associated with reduced DRFS, RFS and OS in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (P < 0.00001). In multivariate analyses the risk score was independent of conventional risk factors for DRFS, RFS and OS (P < 0.05). In node-negative, tamoxifen-treated patients, 10-year recurrence rates were 7.6 [+ or -] 1.5% in the low-risk group versus 20.0 [+ or -] 4.4% in the high-risk group. Further, exploratory analyses revealed associations with outcome in both ER-negative and untreated patients. This is the fifth independent study providing evidence that Mammostrat.sup.[R] can act as an independent prognostic tool for ER-positive, tamoxifen-treated breast cancer. In addition, this study revealed for the first time a possible association with outcome regardless of node status and ER-negative tumors. When viewed in the context of previous results, these data provide further support for this antibody panel as an aid to patient management in early-stage breast cancer.
Patients with early-stage breast cancer, treated with endocrine therapy, have approximately 90% 5-year disease-free survival. However, for patients at higher risk of relapse despite endocrine therapy, additional adjuvant therapy, such as chemotherapy, may be indicated. The challenge is to prospectively identify such patients. The Mammostrat® test uses five immunohistochemical markers to stratify patients on tamoxifen therapy into risk groups to inform treatment decisions. We tested the efficacy of this panel in a mixed population of cases treated in a single center with breast-conserving surgery and long-term follow-up. Tissue microarrays from a consecutive series (1981 to 1998) of 1,812 women managed by wide local excision and postoperative radiotherapy were collected following appropriate ethical review. Of 1,390 cases stained, 197 received no adjuvant hormonal or chemotherapy, 1,044 received tamoxifen only, and 149 received a combination of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. Median age at diagnosis was 57, 71% were postmenopausal, 23.9% were node-positive and median tumor size was 1.5 cm. Samples were stained using triplicate 0.6 mm2 tissue microarray cores, and positivity for p53, HTF9C, CEACAM5, NDRG1 and SLC7A5 was assessed. Each case was assigned a Mammostrat risk score, and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by marker positivity and risk score. Increased Mammostrat scores were significantly associated with reduced DRFS, RFS and OS in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (P < 0.00001). In multivariate analyses the risk score was independent of conventional risk factors for DRFS, RFS and OS (P < 0.05). In node-negative, tamoxifen-treated patients, 10-year recurrence rates were 7.6 ± 1.5% in the low-risk group versus 20.0 ± 4.4% in the high-risk group. Further, exploratory analyses revealed associations with outcome in both ER-negative and untreated patients. This is the fifth independent study providing evidence that Mammostrat can act as an independent prognostic tool for ER-positive, tamoxifen-treated breast cancer. In addition, this study revealed for the first time a possible association with outcome regardless of node status and ER-negative tumors. When viewed in the context of previous results, these data provide further support for this antibody panel as an aid to patient management in early-stage breast cancer.
Introduction Patients with early-stage breast cancer, treated with endocrine therapy, have approximately 90% 5-year disease-free survival. However, for patients at higher risk of relapse despite endocrine therapy, additional adjuvant therapy, such as chemotherapy, may be indicated. The challenge is to prospectively identify such patients. The Mammostrat.sup.[R] test uses five immunohistochemical markers to stratify patients on tamoxifen therapy into risk groups to inform treatment decisions. We tested the efficacy of this panel in a mixed population of cases treated in a single center with breast-conserving surgery and long-term follow-up. Methods Tissue microarrays from a consecutive series (1981 to 1998) of 1,812 women managed by wide local excision and postoperative radiotherapy were collected following appropriate ethical review. Of 1,390 cases stained, 197 received no adjuvant hormonal or chemotherapy, 1,044 received tamoxifen only, and 149 received a combination of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. Median age at diagnosis was 57, 71% were postmenopausal, 23.9% were node-positive and median tumor size was 1.5 cm. Samples were stained using triplicate 0.6 mm.sup.2 tissue microarray cores, and positivity for p53, HTF9C, CEACAM5, NDRG1 and SLC7A5 was assessed. Each case was assigned a Mammostrat.sup.[R] risk score, and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by marker positivity and risk score. Results Increased Mammostrat.sup.[R] scores were significantly associated with reduced DRFS, RFS and OS in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (P < 0.00001). In multivariate analyses the risk score was independent of conventional risk factors for DRFS, RFS and OS (P < 0.05). In node-negative, tamoxifen-treated patients, 10-year recurrence rates were 7.6 [+ or -] 1.5% in the low-risk group versus 20.0 [+ or -] 4.4% in the high-risk group. Further, exploratory analyses revealed associations with outcome in both ER-negative and untreated patients. Conclusions This is the fifth independent study providing evidence that Mammostrat.sup.[R] can act as an independent prognostic tool for ER-positive, tamoxifen-treated breast cancer. In addition, this study revealed for the first time a possible association with outcome regardless of node status and ER-negative tumors. When viewed in the context of previous results, these data provide further support for this antibody panel as an aid to patient management in early-stage breast cancer.
INTRODUCTIONPatients with early-stage breast cancer, treated with endocrine therapy, have approximately 90% 5-year disease-free survival. However, for patients at higher risk of relapse despite endocrine therapy, additional adjuvant therapy, such as chemotherapy, may be indicated. The challenge is to prospectively identify such patients. The Mammostrat® test uses five immunohistochemical markers to stratify patients on tamoxifen therapy into risk groups to inform treatment decisions. We tested the efficacy of this panel in a mixed population of cases treated in a single center with breast-conserving surgery and long-term follow-up. METHODSTissue microarrays from a consecutive series (1981 to 1998) of 1,812 women managed by wide local excision and postoperative radiotherapy were collected following appropriate ethical review. Of 1,390 cases stained, 197 received no adjuvant hormonal or chemotherapy, 1,044 received tamoxifen only, and 149 received a combination of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. Median age at diagnosis was 57, 71% were postmenopausal, 23.9% were node-positive and median tumor size was 1.5 cm. Samples were stained using triplicate 0.6 mm2 tissue microarray cores, and positivity for p53, HTF9C, CEACAM5, NDRG1 and SLC7A5 was assessed. Each case was assigned a Mammostrat risk score, and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by marker positivity and risk score. RESULTSIncreased Mammostrat scores were significantly associated with reduced DRFS, RFS and OS in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (P < 0.00001). In multivariate analyses the risk score was independent of conventional risk factors for DRFS, RFS and OS (P < 0.05). In node-negative, tamoxifen-treated patients, 10-year recurrence rates were 7.6 ± 1.5% in the low-risk group versus 20.0 ± 4.4% in the high-risk group. Further, exploratory analyses revealed associations with outcome in both ER-negative and untreated patients. CONCLUSIONSThis is the fifth independent study providing evidence that Mammostrat can act as an independent prognostic tool for ER-positive, tamoxifen-treated breast cancer. In addition, this study revealed for the first time a possible association with outcome regardless of node status and ER-negative tumors. When viewed in the context of previous results, these data provide further support for this antibody panel as an aid to patient management in early-stage breast cancer.
ArticleNumber R47
Audience Academic
Author Ross, Douglas T
Munro, Alison
Johnstone, Laura
Campbell, Fiona M
Kerr, Gillian R
Chetty, Udi
Thomas, Jeremy
Cameron, David A
Kunkler, Ian H
Bartlett, John M S
Ring, Brian Z
Beck, Rodney A
Jack, Wilma
Seitz, Robert S
Pedersen, Hans Christian
AuthorAffiliation 2 Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
3 Clarient Inc., 31 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656, USA
1 Endocrine Cancer Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh University, Carrington Crescent, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Endocrine Cancer Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh University, Carrington Crescent, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
– name: 2 Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
– name: 3 Clarient Inc., 31 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656, USA
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: John M S
  surname: Bartlett
  fullname: Bartlett, John M S
  email: john.bartlett@ed.ac.uk
  organization: Endocrine Cancer Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh University, Carrington Crescent, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK. john.bartlett@ed.ac.uk
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jeremy
  surname: Thomas
  fullname: Thomas, Jeremy
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Douglas T
  surname: Ross
  fullname: Ross, Douglas T
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Robert S
  surname: Seitz
  fullname: Seitz, Robert S
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Brian Z
  surname: Ring
  fullname: Ring, Brian Z
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Rodney A
  surname: Beck
  fullname: Beck, Rodney A
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Hans Christian
  surname: Pedersen
  fullname: Pedersen, Hans Christian
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Alison
  surname: Munro
  fullname: Munro, Alison
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Ian H
  surname: Kunkler
  fullname: Kunkler, Ian H
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Fiona M
  surname: Campbell
  fullname: Campbell, Fiona M
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Wilma
  surname: Jack
  fullname: Jack, Wilma
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Gillian R
  surname: Kerr
  fullname: Kerr, Gillian R
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Laura
  surname: Johnstone
  fullname: Johnstone, Laura
– sequence: 14
  givenname: David A
  surname: Cameron
  fullname: Cameron, David A
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Udi
  surname: Chetty
  fullname: Chetty, Udi
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20615243$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kt9rFDEQx4NU7A_F_0CCPvh0bZLNj10fhFL8BS2-KPgWkuzsNXU3OZOscP-9ud5Z7qQSSIaZz3xnMswpOgoxAEIvKTmntJUX1iUmCX-CTiiXYiE4-3G0Zx-j05zvCKGqFe0zdMyIpILx5gQNN2aaYi7JFGwyNrjEONYL37v8sMY2gckFOxMcJLyqTgilkgUnn3_iOOAEbk4Jahz3c_JhiSH00VULcLmFZFbr5-jpYMYML3bvGfr-8cO3q8-L66-fvlxdXi-sIF1Z8FYJZ5irjUrqmOKWywZAOOYGBso62nHDuIPGckMYtV2rOi5IL1UPlKrmDL3f6q5mO0HvaqvJjHqV_GTSWkfj9WEk-Fu9jL8163gnG14F3m0FrI__ETiMuDjp3fRr8ttd9RR_zZCLnnx2MI4mQJyzVkJK2XaEVvL1P-RdnFOoo9lAigvORYXebKGlGUH7MMRa0W0k9SVviSSCdRvq_BGqnh4m7-qaDL76DxJ2XboUc04wPPyOEr3Zpr3_vNqf5gP3d32aP-UeyJQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2012_10_005
crossref_primary_10_1074_jbc_RA118_002894
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drup_2018_05_002
crossref_primary_10_3390_microarrays2030228
crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_2012_44_6955
crossref_primary_10_3390_genes10010019
crossref_primary_10_4137_BIC_S9455
crossref_primary_10_2217_fon_15_204
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopha_2018_06_066
crossref_primary_10_1097_CCO_0000000000000252
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms19030907
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soncn_2015_02_008
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_30371
crossref_primary_10_1038_labinvest_2015_2
crossref_primary_10_1093_jnci_djs261
crossref_primary_10_1634_theoncologist_2012_0007
crossref_primary_10_3310_hta20100
crossref_primary_10_2217_fon_12_57
crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2014_156
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms19082373
crossref_primary_10_3892_or_2021_8228
crossref_primary_10_1093_jnci_djw314
crossref_primary_10_1155_2011_373584
crossref_primary_10_1158_0008_5472_CAN_14_2258
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12918_015_0211_x
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2018_00248
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jval_2013_03_1625
crossref_primary_10_1177_107327481502200213
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13059_015_0779_x
crossref_primary_10_1002_jcb_29409
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12609_013_0125_9
crossref_primary_10_1186_bcr3642
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_molmed_2014_01_008
crossref_primary_10_1172_JCI137552
crossref_primary_10_1080_10520295_2017_1290276
crossref_primary_10_4103_2153_3539_137731
crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_18692
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12864_015_1929_y
crossref_primary_10_1089_dna_2011_1437
crossref_primary_10_2174_1389450121666200312105908
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_molonc_2012_02_003
crossref_primary_10_2217_ahe_13_25
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_013_2622_y
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41416_020_01216_6
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_017_11817_6
crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12278
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_015_1283_0
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2020_632079
crossref_primary_10_1111_his_13523
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1349_7006_2011_02151_x
crossref_primary_10_1517_14728222_2012_655725
crossref_primary_10_2217_bmm_2018_0322
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_molonc_2014_03_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breast_2016_06_019
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13058_018_0946_6
crossref_primary_10_3109_10520295_2014_978893
crossref_primary_10_1155_2012_873570
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrd_2018_71
crossref_primary_10_5858_arpa_2014_0599_OA
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_critrevonc_2022_103897
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_critrevonc_2020_102964
crossref_primary_10_1038_s42003_018_0239_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00535_016_1178_0
crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2014_530
crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2015_3486
crossref_primary_10_3389_fchem_2020_564809
crossref_primary_10_1038_modpathol_2013_88
crossref_primary_10_1093_jnci_djr484
crossref_primary_10_1111_his_13334
crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2011_228
crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_2012_42_8896
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_015_3483_3
crossref_primary_10_5306_wjco_v5_i5_883
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0226634
Cites_doi 10.1093/jnci/djj052
10.1002/cncr.23193
10.1038/415530a
10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0
10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03429.x
10.1038/35021093
10.1056/NEJMoa041588
10.1093/jnci/dji427
10.1309/AJCPLN78ZQXEMNMA
10.1200/JCO.2006.05.6564
10.1056/NEJMoa040331
10.1200/JCO.2008.19.5594
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0647
10.1016/j.ejca.2007.11.012
10.1016/S1040-8428(99)00034-7
10.1038/sj.bjc.6605231
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4756
10.1186/bcr1119
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2010 BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts 2010
Copyright ©2010 Bartlett et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010 Bartlett et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2010 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: Copyright National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts 2010
– notice: Copyright ©2010 Bartlett et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010 Bartlett et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
K9.
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1186/bcr2604
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)


MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1465-542X
EndPage R47
ExternalDocumentID oai_biomedcentral_com_bcr2604
2155585271
A480605295
10_1186_bcr2604
20615243
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
04C
0R~
23N
2VQ
2WC
3V.
4.4
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
7X7
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AAWTL
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACJQM
ACMJI
ACPRK
ACRMQ
ADBBV
ADFRT
ADINQ
ADUKV
AENEX
AFKRA
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIAM
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BMSDO
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C1A
C24
C6C
CCPQU
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ECM
EIF
EIHBH
EJD
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
H13
HMCUK
HYE
HZ~
IAO
ICW
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
LGEZI
LOTEE
NADUK
NPM
NXXTH
O5R
O5S
O9-
OK1
P2P
PGMZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
RBZ
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
TR2
U2A
UKHRP
WOQ
AAYXX
CITATION
K9.
7X8
ABVAZ
AFGXO
AFNRJ
AFPKN
ZA5
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-b509t-4875ca2c01761c274b463ee5c2cf2e7bc194a24ce3b4a021b9879450d67de1173
IEDL.DBID RPM
ISSN 1465-542X
1465-5411
IngestDate Tue Sep 17 21:08:49 EDT 2024
Wed May 22 07:10:40 EDT 2024
Fri Oct 25 01:37:26 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 18:44:55 EDT 2024
Tue Nov 19 21:20:15 EST 2024
Tue Nov 12 22:47:48 EST 2024
Fri Nov 22 01:41:03 EST 2024
Tue Oct 15 23:38:00 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
License This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b509t-4875ca2c01761c274b463ee5c2cf2e7bc194a24ce3b4a021b9879450d67de1173
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949634/
PMID 20615243
PQID 756745445
PQPubID 42565
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2949634
biomedcentral_primary_oai_biomedcentral_com_bcr2604
proquest_miscellaneous_756668901
proquest_journals_756745445
gale_infotracmisc_A480605295
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A480605295
crossref_primary_10_1186_bcr2604
pubmed_primary_20615243
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2010-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2010
  text: 2010-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Breast cancer research : BCR
PublicationTitleAlternate Breast Cancer Res
PublicationYear 2010
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts
BioMed Central
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts
– name: BioMed Central
References 18927301 - Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Oct 15;14(20):6602-9
18698033 - Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Aug 15;14(16):5158-65
19672259 - Br J Cancer. 2009 Sep 15;101(6):875-8
19139426 - J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):840-2
19095573 - Am J Clin Pathol. 2009 Jan;131(1):106-11
18072256 - Cancer. 2008 Feb 1;112(3 Suppl):700-9
16478745 - J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Feb 15;98(4):262-72
12670887 - Cancer Res. 2003 Apr 1;63(7):1445-8
15014181 - N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 11;350(11):1081-92
16809728 - J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):3039-47
19845790 - Histopathology. 2009 Dec;55(6):724-31
15894097 - Lancet. 2005 May 14-20;365(9472):1687-717
16368942 - J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Dec 21;97(24):1808-15
11823860 - Nature. 2002 Jan 31;415(6871):530-6
10963602 - Nature. 2000 Aug 17;406(6797):747-52
15591335 - N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 30;351(27):2817-26
10532196 - Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1999 Aug;31(3):209-23
CM Perou (2565_CR7) 2000; 406
S Paik (2565_CR14) 2004; 351
BZ Ring (2565_CR15) 2006; 24
RL Camp (2565_CR19) 2003; 63
S Pancholi (2565_CR2) 2005; 7
L Hughes-Davies (2565_CR4) 2009; 101
PM Ravdin (2565_CR9) 2003; 82
A McCabe (2565_CR18) 2005; 97
JMS Bartlett (2565_CR21) 2009; 131
C Desmedt (2565_CR10) 2008; 44
C Desmedt (2565_CR11) 2008; 14
C Sotiriou (2565_CR12) 2006; 98
RC Coombes (2565_CR3) 2004; 350
DT Ross (2565_CR16) 2008; 14
B Seruga (2565_CR5) 2009; 27
JMS Bartlett (2565_CR20) 2009; 69
AU Buzdar (2565_CR6) 2008; 112
JS Thomas (2565_CR17) 2009; 55
LJ van't Veer (2565_CR13) 2002; 415
Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2565_CR1) 2005; 365
CW Elston (2565_CR8) 1999; 31
References_xml – volume: 98
  start-page: 262
  year: 2006
  ident: 2565_CR12
  publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj052
  contributor:
    fullname: C Sotiriou
– volume: 112
  start-page: 700
  year: 2008
  ident: 2565_CR6
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.23193
  contributor:
    fullname: AU Buzdar
– volume: 415
  start-page: 530
  year: 2002
  ident: 2565_CR13
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/415530a
  contributor:
    fullname: LJ van't Veer
– volume: 365
  start-page: 1687
  year: 2005
  ident: 2565_CR1
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0
  contributor:
    fullname: Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG)
– volume: 55
  start-page: 724
  year: 2009
  ident: 2565_CR17
  publication-title: Histopathology
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03429.x
  contributor:
    fullname: JS Thomas
– volume: 406
  start-page: 747
  year: 2000
  ident: 2565_CR7
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/35021093
  contributor:
    fullname: CM Perou
– volume: 351
  start-page: 2817
  year: 2004
  ident: 2565_CR14
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041588
  contributor:
    fullname: S Paik
– volume: 82
  start-page: 321
  year: 2003
  ident: 2565_CR9
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res Treat
  contributor:
    fullname: PM Ravdin
– volume: 63
  start-page: 1445
  year: 2003
  ident: 2565_CR19
  publication-title: Cancer Res
  contributor:
    fullname: RL Camp
– volume: 97
  start-page: 1808
  year: 2005
  ident: 2565_CR18
  publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji427
  contributor:
    fullname: A McCabe
– volume: 131
  start-page: 106
  year: 2009
  ident: 2565_CR21
  publication-title: Am J Clin Pathol
  doi: 10.1309/AJCPLN78ZQXEMNMA
  contributor:
    fullname: JMS Bartlett
– volume: 24
  start-page: 3039
  year: 2006
  ident: 2565_CR15
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.6564
  contributor:
    fullname: BZ Ring
– volume: 350
  start-page: 1081
  year: 2004
  ident: 2565_CR3
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040331
  contributor:
    fullname: RC Coombes
– volume: 27
  start-page: 840
  year: 2009
  ident: 2565_CR5
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.5594
  contributor:
    fullname: B Seruga
– volume: 14
  start-page: 6602
  year: 2008
  ident: 2565_CR16
  publication-title: Clin Cancer Res
  doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0647
  contributor:
    fullname: DT Ross
– volume: 44
  start-page: 326
  year: 2008
  ident: 2565_CR10
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.11.012
  contributor:
    fullname: C Desmedt
– volume: 69
  start-page: 206S
  year: 2009
  ident: 2565_CR20
  publication-title: Cancer Res
  contributor:
    fullname: JMS Bartlett
– volume: 31
  start-page: 209
  year: 1999
  ident: 2565_CR8
  publication-title: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol
  doi: 10.1016/S1040-8428(99)00034-7
  contributor:
    fullname: CW Elston
– volume: 101
  start-page: 875
  year: 2009
  ident: 2565_CR4
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605231
  contributor:
    fullname: L Hughes-Davies
– volume: 14
  start-page: 5158
  year: 2008
  ident: 2565_CR11
  publication-title: Clin Cancer Res
  doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4756
  contributor:
    fullname: C Desmedt
– volume: 7
  start-page: P2.08
  year: 2005
  ident: 2565_CR2
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res
  doi: 10.1186/bcr1119
  contributor:
    fullname: S Pancholi
SSID ssj0017858
Score 2.3028429
Snippet Patients with early-stage breast cancer, treated with endocrine therapy, have approximately 90% 5-year disease-free survival. However, for patients at higher...
Introduction Patients with early-stage breast cancer, treated with endocrine therapy, have approximately 90% 5-year disease-free survival. However, for...
Tissue microarrays from a consecutive series (1981 to 1998) of 1,812 women managed by wide local excision and postoperative radiotherapy were collected...
INTRODUCTIONPatients with early-stage breast cancer, treated with endocrine therapy, have approximately 90% 5-year disease-free survival. However, for patients...
INTRODUCTION: Patients with early-stage breast cancer, treated with endocrine therapy, have approximately 90% 5-year disease-free survival. However, for...
SourceID pubmedcentral
biomedcentral
proquest
gale
crossref
pubmed
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage R47
SubjectTerms Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use
Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy
Breast Neoplasms - metabolism
Cancer patients
Cancer research
Carcinoembryonic Antigen - metabolism
Care and treatment
Cell Cycle Proteins - metabolism
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods
Disease-Free Survival
Estrogens
Female
GPI-Linked Proteins - metabolism
Health aspects
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins - metabolism
Large Neutral Amino Acid-Transporter 1 - metabolism
Lumpectomy
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Postmenopausal women
Prognosis
Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism
Recurrence (Disease)
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment - methods
Risk Factors
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tamoxifen
Tamoxifen - therapeutic use
Tumor proteins
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 - metabolism
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: BioMedCentral Open Access*
  dbid: RBZ
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Pa90wDBddB2OX0bX7k7YbGoztFBY7_pMc38ZKGXSHsULZJdiOQwddMl7Tw_tS_RD9ZJWd9PW57LRLCEgCx7IiyZZ-BnjvZQBxKXSuGe9yIb3OSc0tvRU116Y1ysZqi-_q-FR8O5NnW_Du3yf4rFKfrFtSzC0ewWPKFMqQX_34_Gt9UKCreAUn2bvMpWBs6ovdFHzQyX6ROKCHv-ENP5TWSG44naMdeDZHi7iY1Psctny_C3uLnjLlPyv8gLF-M26M78KTk_mYfA_OTwwtr4iIe3ON5hINjsNwQQ-cYHK7FdpQjT6iC1pf4gyvSpwjhmpzHDpchq342AyIUzMj-r4dXGgXxKlta_UCTo--_vxynM9XKuSWJn_MQ3riDHc0cYo5ykitUKX30nHXca-tY7UwXDhfWmHI_du6IoOVRat06xnT5UvY7ofevwZUuvZSs7b0IYWTunYV6ypljG2VcmWRQZnMe_N3gs9oAqB1SiHbamZtZYB32lkLxDylUvcsH4PWmmCBJO7M3EhAwwpYVs1CVIWKB5gZHCacZDkuIR_c6b2ZLfey0VJpERCKaCRrahAMxWi9H64ii1IVBVIZvJoWyXqoPESIXJQZ6GT5JB-fUvrf5xHVm9eCrETs_9e0HcDTqawh7A0dwva4vPJvKFoa7dtoL7cLPxfc
  priority: 500
  providerName: BioMedCentral
Title Mammostrat as a tool to stratify breast cancer patients at risk of recurrence during endocrine therapy
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20615243
https://www.proquest.com/docview/756745445
https://search.proquest.com/docview/756668901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr2604
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC2949634
Volume 12
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEB6SHEovpU36cJMGHUp7ctYPPezjNjSEwIZSGgi9GEmWSWDXDhvnsH-qP6K_rDOyvY1yzMUYJBnZM-OZkb75BPDZCSJxSVSs0qyJuXAqRjHXeJeUmdK1lsajLS7l-RW_uBbXOyCmWhgP2rfm9qRdrk7a2xuPrbxb2dmEE5v9WJxmJccH8tku7KL7nVL0cetAFf5QTvwDiFjwNB0qZTGOljNj1xi-01E8GXnyjEp1gjL3ZeCdnv6jHzmpEED5yCOdvYZXYyjJ5sOU38COa_fhYN5iGr3asC_Mgzv9qvk-vFiMe-gHcLPQqHueLvfvH6bvmWZ91y3xwgYO3WbDDEHVe2ZJJdZs5F7Fnj0jKDrrGramdXpfKciGSkfm2rqzVEvIhpquzVu4Ovv-6_Q8Hs9biA1Kpo8pd7E6s_gNZWoxXTVc5s4Jm9kmc8rYtOQ649blhmuMDUxZoDWLpJaqdmmq8new13at-wBMqtIJlda5o_xOqNIWaVNIrU0tpc2TCPLgu1d3A7dGRWzXYQsaXjUKLgI2SWc7wCcxhfzf5StJrSLzxOFWj1UGOC0iuqrmvEik392M4CjoiWZlg-bDSe7VaNb3lRJScaIvwplsW2kgIdVa1z34LlIWGGVF8H5Qku1UJ6WLQAXqE7x82IIW4Cm_R43_-OyRh_BywD3Q4tER7PXrB_cJw6neHPtlCLz-_Pb72JvSP33BJJk
link.rule.ids 108,230,314,727,780,784,864,885,24937,27924,27925,53791,53793,75811,75812
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwEB5RKrW9oBb6CI_Wh6o9hY0TP5LjChUtLYt6AIlbZDuOQNpN0BIO-6f6I_hljJ1ki3vsZbWS7ZU3MxPP2N_3GeCr5U7EJZGxpGkdM25ljGau8FtSpFJVSmiPtrgQsyv285pfbwEfuTAetG_07XGzWB43tzceW3m3NJMRJzb5PT9JC4Y_yCYv4CXPZEHHIn04PJC5v5YT3wE85ozSniuLmbSYaLPCBN5dxpO6tTx1ZJ2A6L4I1qd_39LPlqkQQvlsTTp9CztDMkmm_aTfwZZtdmFv2mAhvVyTb8TDO_2--S68mg-n6HtwM1fofV4w9_EPUfdEka5tF_hBehXdek20A6t3xDinWJFBfRV7dsSB0Ulbk5XbqfdcQdJzHYltqtY4NiHpWV3r93B1-uPyZBYPNy7EGm3Txa56MSo1-AwFNViwaiYya7lJTZ1aqQ0tmEqZsZlmCrMDXeQYzzyphKwspTL7ANtN29hPQIQsLJe0yqyr8LgsTE7rXCilKyFMlkSQBc-9vOvVNUqndx22YOiVg-EiIKN1NgN8GZOLv12-O6uVLkBxuFEDzwCn5aSuyinLE-HPNyM4DHpiYJmg-WC0ezkE9n0puZDMCRjhTDatbqDDqjW2ffBdhMgxz4rgY-8km6mOTheBDNwn-PNhC8aAF_0efH7_v0d-gdezy_l5eX528esA3vQoCLeVdAjb3erBHmFy1enPPpSeADTUJeo
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwELYoSKiXqoW2pFDqQ9WeQl5-JMcV7Yo-FnEoErfIdhyBtJuslnDYP8WP4Jd1xkm26x65RJFsR45nxp6xv_lMyGfLkcQllqFM0jpk3MoQxFzBW1ykUlVKaIe2uBQX1-znDb_ZuurLgfaNvjtr5ouz5u7WYSuXCxONOLHoanaeFgw-yKJlVUcvyB7PQMnGQH04QJC5u5oT5gEecpYkfb4seNMi0mYFTjxeyJPiep5iwo6X7D731qj_Z-qtpcqHUW6tS9PX5NXgUNJJ3_E3ZMc2B-Rw0kAwvVjTL9RBPN3e-QHZnw0n6YfkdqZAAx1p7tMjVfdU0a5t5_CgPZNuvaYaAesdNagYKzowsELNjiIgnbY1XeFuvcsXpH2-I7VN1RrMKKR9Ztf6Lbmefv9zfhEOty6EGuTThRjBGJUaGEORGAhaNROZtdykpk6t1CYpmEqZsZlmCjwEXeRg0zyuhKxsksjsHdlt2sYeESpkYblMqsxilMdlYfKkzoVSuhLCZHFAMm_cy2XPsFEi57VfAuZXDoILCB2ls2ngQplc_KvyFaVWopFCc6OGXAPoFtJdlROWx8KdcQbkxKsJxmW84uNR7uVg3Pel5EIyJDGCnmxKsSHi1RrbPrgqQuTgawXkfa8km66OShcQ6amP9_N-CdiBI_4e9P7Ds1t-IvtX36bl7x-Xv47Jyx4IgbtJJ2S3Wz3Yj-BfdfrUWdJfUTsm_Q
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mammostrat%C2%AEas+a+tool+to+stratify+breast+cancer+patients+at+risk+of+recurrence+during+endocrine+therapy&rft.jtitle=Breast+cancer+research+%3A+BCR&rft.au=Bartlett%2C+John+MS&rft.au=Thomas%2C+Jeremy&rft.au=Ross%2C+Douglas+T&rft.au=Seitz%2C+Robert+S&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.issn=1465-542X&rft.eissn=1465-542X&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fbcr2604&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_bcr2604
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1465-542X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1465-542X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1465-542X&client=summon