Examining the application of the IDEAL framework in the reporting and evaluation of innovative invasive procedures: secondary qualitative analysis of a systematic review

ObjectivesThe development of new surgical procedures is fundamental to advancing patient care. The Idea, Developments, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term (IDEAL) framework describes study designs for stages of innovation. It can be difficult to apply due to challenges in defining and identifying...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMJ open Vol. 14; no. 5; p. e079654
Main Authors Richards, Hollie Sarah, Cousins, Sian, Scroggie, Darren L, Elliott, Daisy, Macefield, Rhiannon, Hudson, Elizabeth, Mutanga, Ian Rodney, Shah, Maximilian, Alford, Natasha, Blencowe, Natalie S, Blazeby, Jane
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 24.05.2024
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
SeriesOriginal research
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079654

Cover

Loading…
Abstract ObjectivesThe development of new surgical procedures is fundamental to advancing patient care. The Idea, Developments, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term (IDEAL) framework describes study designs for stages of innovation. It can be difficult to apply due to challenges in defining and identifying innovative procedures. This study examined how the IDEAL framework is operationalised in real-world settings; specifically, the types of innovations evaluated using the framework and how authors justify their choice of IDEAL study design.DesignSecondary qualitative analysis of a systematic review.Data sourcesCitation searches (Web of Science and Scopus) identified studies following the IDEAL framework and citing any of the ten key IDEAL/IDEAL_D papers.Eligibility criteriaStudies of invasive procedures/devices of any design citing any of the ten key IDEAL/IDEAL_D papers.Data extraction and synthesisAll relevant text was extracted. Three frameworks were developed, namely: (1) type of innovation under evaluation; (2) terminology used to describe stage of innovation and (3) reported rationale for IDEAL stage.Results48 articles were included. 19/48 described entirely new procedures, including those used for the first time in a different clinical context (n=15/48), reported as IDEAL stage 2a (n=8, 53%). Terminology describing stage of innovation was varied, inconsistent and ambiguous and was not defined. Authors justified their choice of IDEAL study design based on limitations in published evidence (n=36) and unknown feasibility and safety (n=32) outcomes.ConclusionIdentifying stage of innovation is crucial to inform appropriate study design and governance decisions. Authors’ rationale for choice of IDEAL stage related to the existing evidence base or lack of sufficient outcome data for procedures. Stage of innovation was poorly defined with inconsistent descriptions. Further work is needed to develop methods to identify innovation to inform practical application of the IDEAL framework. Defining the concept of innovation in terms of uncertainty, risk and degree of evidence may help to inform decision-making.
AbstractList ObjectivesThe development of new surgical procedures is fundamental to advancing patient care. The Idea, Developments, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term (IDEAL) framework describes study designs for stages of innovation. It can be difficult to apply due to challenges in defining and identifying innovative procedures. This study examined how the IDEAL framework is operationalised in real-world settings; specifically, the types of innovations evaluated using the framework and how authors justify their choice of IDEAL study design.DesignSecondary qualitative analysis of a systematic review.Data sourcesCitation searches (Web of Science and Scopus) identified studies following the IDEAL framework and citing any of the ten key IDEAL/IDEAL_D papers.Eligibility criteriaStudies of invasive procedures/devices of any design citing any of the ten key IDEAL/IDEAL_D papers.Data extraction and synthesisAll relevant text was extracted. Three frameworks were developed, namely: (1) type of innovation under evaluation; (2) terminology used to describe stage of innovation and (3) reported rationale for IDEAL stage.Results48 articles were included. 19/48 described entirely new procedures, including those used for the first time in a different clinical context (n=15/48), reported as IDEAL stage 2a (n=8, 53%). Terminology describing stage of innovation was varied, inconsistent and ambiguous and was not defined. Authors justified their choice of IDEAL study design based on limitations in published evidence (n=36) and unknown feasibility and safety (n=32) outcomes.ConclusionIdentifying stage of innovation is crucial to inform appropriate study design and governance decisions. Authors’ rationale for choice of IDEAL stage related to the existing evidence base or lack of sufficient outcome data for procedures. Stage of innovation was poorly defined with inconsistent descriptions. Further work is needed to develop methods to identify innovation to inform practical application of the IDEAL framework. Defining the concept of innovation in terms of uncertainty, risk and degree of evidence may help to inform decision-making.
Objectives The development of new surgical procedures is fundamental to advancing patient care. The Idea, Developments, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term (IDEAL) framework describes study designs for stages of innovation. It can be difficult to apply due to challenges in defining and identifying innovative procedures. This study examined how the IDEAL framework is operationalised in real-world settings; specifically, the types of innovations evaluated using the framework and how authors justify their choice of IDEAL study design.Design Secondary qualitative analysis of a systematic review.Data sources Citation searches (Web of Science and Scopus) identified studies following the IDEAL framework and citing any of the ten key IDEAL/IDEAL_D papers.Eligibility criteria Studies of invasive procedures/devices of any design citing any of the ten key IDEAL/IDEAL_D papers.Data extraction and synthesis All relevant text was extracted. Three frameworks were developed, namely: (1) type of innovation under evaluation; (2) terminology used to describe stage of innovation and (3) reported rationale for IDEAL stage.Results 48 articles were included. 19/48 described entirely new procedures, including those used for the first time in a different clinical context (n=15/48), reported as IDEAL stage 2a (n=8, 53%). Terminology describing stage of innovation was varied, inconsistent and ambiguous and was not defined. Authors justified their choice of IDEAL study design based on limitations in published evidence (n=36) and unknown feasibility and safety (n=32) outcomes.Conclusion Identifying stage of innovation is crucial to inform appropriate study design and governance decisions. Authors’ rationale for choice of IDEAL stage related to the existing evidence base or lack of sufficient outcome data for procedures. Stage of innovation was poorly defined with inconsistent descriptions. Further work is needed to develop methods to identify innovation to inform practical application of the IDEAL framework. Defining the concept of innovation in terms of uncertainty, risk and degree of evidence may help to inform decision-making.
The development of new surgical procedures is fundamental to advancing patient care. The Idea, Developments, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term (IDEAL) framework describes study designs for stages of innovation. It can be difficult to apply due to challenges in defining and identifying innovative procedures. This study examined how the IDEAL framework is operationalised in real-world settings; specifically, the types of innovations evaluated using the framework and how authors justify their choice of IDEAL study design. Secondary qualitative analysis of a systematic review. Citation searches (Web of Science and Scopus) identified studies following the IDEAL framework and citing any of the ten key IDEAL/IDEAL_D papers. Studies of invasive procedures/devices of any design citing any of the ten key IDEAL/IDEAL_D papers. All relevant text was extracted. Three frameworks were developed, namely: (1) type of innovation under evaluation; (2) terminology used to describe stage of innovation and (3) reported rationale for IDEAL stage. 48 articles were included. 19/48 described entirely new procedures, including those used for the first time in a different clinical context (n=15/48), reported as IDEAL stage 2a (n=8, 53%). Terminology describing stage of innovation was varied, inconsistent and ambiguous and was not defined. Authors justified their choice of IDEAL study design based on limitations in published evidence (n=36) and unknown feasibility and safety (n=32) outcomes. Identifying stage of innovation is crucial to inform appropriate study design and governance decisions. Authors' rationale for choice of IDEAL stage related to the existing evidence base or lack of sufficient outcome data for procedures. Stage of innovation was poorly defined with inconsistent descriptions. Further work is needed to develop methods to identify innovation to inform practical application of the IDEAL framework. Defining the concept of innovation in terms of uncertainty, risk and degree of evidence may help to inform decision-making.
The development of new surgical procedures is fundamental to advancing patient care. The Idea, Developments, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term (IDEAL) framework describes study designs for stages of innovation. It can be difficult to apply due to challenges in defining and identifying innovative procedures. This study examined how the IDEAL framework is operationalised in real-world settings; specifically, the types of innovations evaluated using the framework and how authors justify their choice of IDEAL study design.OBJECTIVESThe development of new surgical procedures is fundamental to advancing patient care. The Idea, Developments, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term (IDEAL) framework describes study designs for stages of innovation. It can be difficult to apply due to challenges in defining and identifying innovative procedures. This study examined how the IDEAL framework is operationalised in real-world settings; specifically, the types of innovations evaluated using the framework and how authors justify their choice of IDEAL study design.Secondary qualitative analysis of a systematic review.DESIGNSecondary qualitative analysis of a systematic review.Citation searches (Web of Science and Scopus) identified studies following the IDEAL framework and citing any of the ten key IDEAL/IDEAL_D papers.DATA SOURCESCitation searches (Web of Science and Scopus) identified studies following the IDEAL framework and citing any of the ten key IDEAL/IDEAL_D papers.Studies of invasive procedures/devices of any design citing any of the ten key IDEAL/IDEAL_D papers.ELIGIBILITY CRITERIAStudies of invasive procedures/devices of any design citing any of the ten key IDEAL/IDEAL_D papers.All relevant text was extracted. Three frameworks were developed, namely: (1) type of innovation under evaluation; (2) terminology used to describe stage of innovation and (3) reported rationale for IDEAL stage.DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESISAll relevant text was extracted. Three frameworks were developed, namely: (1) type of innovation under evaluation; (2) terminology used to describe stage of innovation and (3) reported rationale for IDEAL stage.48 articles were included. 19/48 described entirely new procedures, including those used for the first time in a different clinical context (n=15/48), reported as IDEAL stage 2a (n=8, 53%). Terminology describing stage of innovation was varied, inconsistent and ambiguous and was not defined. Authors justified their choice of IDEAL study design based on limitations in published evidence (n=36) and unknown feasibility and safety (n=32) outcomes.RESULTS48 articles were included. 19/48 described entirely new procedures, including those used for the first time in a different clinical context (n=15/48), reported as IDEAL stage 2a (n=8, 53%). Terminology describing stage of innovation was varied, inconsistent and ambiguous and was not defined. Authors justified their choice of IDEAL study design based on limitations in published evidence (n=36) and unknown feasibility and safety (n=32) outcomes.Identifying stage of innovation is crucial to inform appropriate study design and governance decisions. Authors' rationale for choice of IDEAL stage related to the existing evidence base or lack of sufficient outcome data for procedures. Stage of innovation was poorly defined with inconsistent descriptions. Further work is needed to develop methods to identify innovation to inform practical application of the IDEAL framework. Defining the concept of innovation in terms of uncertainty, risk and degree of evidence may help to inform decision-making.CONCLUSIONIdentifying stage of innovation is crucial to inform appropriate study design and governance decisions. Authors' rationale for choice of IDEAL stage related to the existing evidence base or lack of sufficient outcome data for procedures. Stage of innovation was poorly defined with inconsistent descriptions. Further work is needed to develop methods to identify innovation to inform practical application of the IDEAL framework. Defining the concept of innovation in terms of uncertainty, risk and degree of evidence may help to inform decision-making.
Author Shah, Maximilian
Richards, Hollie Sarah
Scroggie, Darren L
Cousins, Sian
Macefield, Rhiannon
Blencowe, Natalie S
Elliott, Daisy
Blazeby, Jane
Hudson, Elizabeth
Alford, Natasha
Mutanga, Ian Rodney
AuthorAffiliation National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School , University of Bristol Medical School , Bristol , UK
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School , University of Bristol Medical School , Bristol , UK
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Hollie Sarah
  orcidid: 0000-0001-9181-7005
  surname: Richards
  fullname: Richards, Hollie Sarah
  email: hollie.richards@bristol.ac.uk
  organization: National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Sian
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0088-841X
  surname: Cousins
  fullname: Cousins, Sian
  organization: National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Darren L
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5472-2602
  surname: Scroggie
  fullname: Scroggie, Darren L
  organization: National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Daisy
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8143-9549
  surname: Elliott
  fullname: Elliott, Daisy
  organization: National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Rhiannon
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6606-5427
  surname: Macefield
  fullname: Macefield, Rhiannon
  organization: National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Elizabeth
  surname: Hudson
  fullname: Hudson, Elizabeth
  organization: National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Ian Rodney
  surname: Mutanga
  fullname: Mutanga, Ian Rodney
  organization: National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Maximilian
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6522-1945
  surname: Shah
  fullname: Shah, Maximilian
  organization: National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Natasha
  surname: Alford
  fullname: Alford, Natasha
  organization: National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Natalie S
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6111-2175
  surname: Blencowe
  fullname: Blencowe, Natalie S
  organization: National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Jane
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3354-3330
  surname: Blazeby
  fullname: Blazeby, Jane
  organization: National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38803251$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9Uk1v1DAQjVARLUt_ARKKxKWXpbZj54MLqsoCK63EBc7WxJlsvSR2aicp-5P4lzibZWk54IvHM--9mbHey-jMWINR9JqSd5Qm6XXZ7myHZskIS5YkK1LBn0UXjHC-TIkQZ4_i8-jS-x0Jh4tCCPYiOk_ynCRM0Ivo1-ontNpos437O4yh6xqtoNfWxLY-pNYfVzebuHbQ4oN1P2JtDmmHnXX9xANTxThCM5xo2hg7hteIIRzBT0HnrMJqcOjfxx6VNRW4fXw_QKP7GQoGmr3XflKA2O99j22oqNBq1PjwKnpeQ-Px8ngvou-fVt9uvyw3Xz-vb282y5IXpF9WGeElz1MKJVAkmJdZWkFFauCqYkWWJQII5YIjKQsyoQuVC4FUJZzXpEoW0XrWrSzsZOd0GwaVFrQ8JKzbSgiLqwalYKLIy5JxUQFPSFEktaCpKlVWlTXWKmh9mLW6oWyxUmh6B80T0acVo-_k1o6SUsoKwkRQuDoqOHs_oO9lq73CpgGDdvAyIenkBx72WkRv_4Hu7ODCp04oUXDGWU4D6s3jkU6z_LFEACQzQDnrvcP6BKFETr3k0Xty8p6cvRdY1zMrFP_2_R_jN6EW4Pk
Cites_doi 10.1002/ccr3.792
10.1093/jmp/jht047
10.1186/s12894-018-0409-5
10.1159/000458709
10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7
10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.12.061
10.1136/bmj.m1172
10.1186/1472-6963-7-182
10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.019
10.1002/bjs.11391
10.1007/s11017-013-9272-2
10.1111/bju.14676
10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.049
10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.117
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033641
10.1007/s10728-019-00380-y
10.1016/j.euf.2015.09.001
10.1111/codi.14650
10.2196/resprot.6725
10.1097/SLA.0b013e31829ccc5f
10.1080/15265161.2019.1602181
10.1136/bmj.f3011
10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.082
10.1007/s00268-003-7096-3
10.1002/bjs.7387
10.1007/s11701-018-0839-9
10.1093/bjs/znac223
10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.008
10.1007/s00423-016-1466-4
10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.07.008
10.1111/bju.14077
10.1097/SLA.0000000000002794
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035251
10.1136/bmj.i2372
10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.09.016
10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.01.022
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003106
10.1007/s12055-019-00855-6
10.1016/j.surg.2020.03.018
10.1002/bjs5.50358
10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.039
10.1186/s12893-018-0430-3
10.3310/hta14080
10.1136/bmj.f3012
10.1186/s12893-020-00970-x
10.2196/resprot.8862
10.1093/jhps/hnv074
10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.047
10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.039
10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2
10.2196/resprot.9813
10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.02.010
10.1007/s00464-020-07492-w
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.02.011
10.5173/ceju.2015.683
10.1155/2016/5184595
10.1007/s00464-014-3587-6
10.1186/1754-9493-1-4
10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.011
10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.05.018
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001174
10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.006
10.1371/journal.pmed.1000144
10.1007/s12325-017-0493-z
10.1093/bjs/znac347
10.1102/1470-7330.2011.0034
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.066
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049234
10.1111/ans.15683
10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.057
10.3389/fonc.2018.00626
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003748
10.1177/1553350612468959
10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
10.1007/s00701-017-3280-3
10.1016/j.cct.2014.07.006
10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00493-9
10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.142
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028576
10.2196/15687
10.1177/0300060516684721
10.1002/bjs.9675
10.1002/bjs.10115
10.1177/1553350611421916
10.1136/bmj.f2820
10.1093/dote/doy079
10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.035
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
2024 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
– notice: 2024 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. 2024
DBID 9YT
ACMMV
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7RV
7X7
7XB
88E
88G
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
BTHHO
CCPQU
COVID
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
K9-
K9.
KB0
M0R
M0S
M1P
M2M
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PSYQQ
Q9U
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079654
DatabaseName BMJ Open Access Journals
BMJ Journals:Open Access
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Nursing & Allied Health Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Psychology Database (Alumni)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
BMJ Journals
ProQuest One Community College
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
Consumer Health Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Psychology Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Family Health (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Family Health
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest Psychology Journals
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
BMJ Journals
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database


MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: ACMMV
  name: BMJ Journals:Open Access
  url: https://journals.bmj.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 5
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2044-6055
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_52598bb245da430993f516cbc7dbfefc
PMC11129025
38803251
10_1136_bmjopen_2023_079654
bmjopen
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre
  grantid: Not Applicable
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100015250
– fundername: ;
  grantid: Not Applicable
GroupedDBID ---
4.4
53G
5VS
7RV
7X7
7~R
88E
8FI
8FJ
9YT
ABUWG
ACGFS
ACMMV
ADBBV
AENEX
AFKRA
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
AZQEC
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BKNYI
BPHCQ
BTFSW
BTHHO
CCPQU
DIK
DWQXO
EBS
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
HZ~
K9-
KQ8
M0R
M1P
M2M
M48
M~E
NAPCQ
O9-
OK1
PGMZT
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PSYQQ
RHI
RMJ
RPM
UKHRP
AAYXX
ADRAZ
BVXVI
CITATION
EJD
H13
PHGZM
3V.
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
RHF
7XB
8FK
COVID
K9.
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-b490t-d704b4861aba1e0e8b76dad0fa4cd297735a01454e0b90d7049c855e1c344f0d3
IEDL.DBID 9YT
ISSN 2044-6055
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:25:11 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:33:49 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 05 10:46:04 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 23:03:05 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:05:53 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:09:55 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:50:10 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords systematic review
qualitative research
surgery
Language English
License This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b490t-d704b4861aba1e0e8b76dad0fa4cd297735a01454e0b90d7049c855e1c344f0d3
Notes Original research
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-3354-3330
0000-0002-6606-5427
0000-0002-6111-2175
0000-0001-6522-1945
0000-0003-0088-841X
0000-0001-9181-7005
0000-0002-5472-2602
0000-0001-8143-9549
OpenAccessLink https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/5/e079654.full
PMID 38803251
PQID 3059424281
PQPubID 2040975
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_52598bb245da430993f516cbc7dbfefc
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11129025
proquest_miscellaneous_3061136477
proquest_journals_3059424281
pubmed_primary_38803251
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_079654
bmj_journals_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_079654
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-05-24
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-05-24
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-05-24
  day: 24
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
– name: BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR
PublicationSeriesTitle Original research
PublicationTitle BMJ open
PublicationTitleAbbrev BMJ Open
PublicationTitleAlternate BMJ Open
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher British Medical Journal Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
Publisher_xml – name: British Medical Journal Publishing Group
– name: BMJ Publishing Group LTD
– name: BMJ Publishing Group
References Solari, Jawaid, Jesudason (R41) 2011; 46
Hutchison, Rogers, Eyers (R21) 2015; 262
Harvey, Mills, White (R75) 2020; 10
Lee (R13) 2016; 3
Bus, de Bruin, Faber (R47) 2016; 196
Kaouk, Haber, Autorino (R59) 2014; 66
Menon, Abaza, Sood (R71) 2014; 65
Harris, Taylor, Minor (R38) 2019; 95
Ergina, Cook, Blazeby (R7) 2009; 374
Hallmann, Petersein, Ruttloff (R66) 2017; 5
Stenstra, van Workum, van den Wildenberg (R55) 2019; 32
Cousins, Richards, Zahra (R88) 2022; 109
Biffl, Spain, Reitsma (R17) 2008; 206
Inoue, Saiura, Sato (R54) 2016; 401
Stefanidis, Fanelli, Price (R89) 2014; 28
Song, Parekh, Hooper (R85) 2010; 14
Dumont, Duchalais, Aumont (R52) 2020; 34
Saglam, Muslumanoglu, Tokatlı (R81) 2014; 66
Barski, Arndt, Gerullis (R61) 2017; 39
Liem, Freund, Baard (R49) 2018; 7
Jain, Duh, Hirose (R18) 2020; 168
Sharma, Momose, Sedrakyan (R70) 2019; 67
Gerullis, Ecke, Barski (R56) 2017; 45
Zahra, Paramasivan, Blencowe (R22) 2020; 10
Birchley, Huxtable, Ives (R10) 2019; 19
Villers, Puech, Flamand (R77) 2017; 72
Minervini, Vanacore, Vittori (R43) 2018; 121
Elliott, Blencowe, Cousins (R92) 2021; 11
Barentsz, Verkooijen, Pijnappel (R64) 2015; 14
Heikens, Gooszen, Rovers (R80) 2013; 20
Thornton (R96) 2020
Zaki, Cote, Muskens (R25) 2018; 114
McKneally, Daar (R14) 2003; 27
Danjoux, Martin, Lehoux (R12) 2007; 7
Hirst, Philippou, Blazeby (R4) 2019; 269
Barkun, Aronson, Feldman (R34) 2009; 374
Breda, Territo, Guttilla (R46) 2018; 4
Joukhadar, Wöckel, Herr (R79) 2016; 2016
Macefield, Wilson, Hoffmann (R27) 2020; 4
Buijs, van Lienden, Wagstaff (R76); 6
Currie, Brigic, Blencowe (R5) 2015; 102
Hasenboehler, Choudhry, Newman (R83) 2007; 1
Rischmann, Gelet, Riche (R45) 2017; 71
Khachane, Philippou, Hirst (R8) 2018; 57
Goh, Prieto, Syn (R53) 2020; 90
Ross, Mulvey, Hines (R84) 2009; 6
Blazeby, Blencowe, Titcomb (R51) 2011; 98
Versteeg, van der Velden, Hes (R62) 2018; 8
Banagala, Jayarajah, Almeida (R73) 2018; 18
Vijayan, Lachma, Mohan Rao (R87) 2020; 36
Tradewell, Albersheim, Dahm (R9) 2019; 123
Meyerson (R11) 2013; 38
Gerullis, Barski, Georgas (R57) 2017; 34
Mannaerts, Wildeboer, Postema (R63) 2018; 18
McCulloch, Cook, Altman (R30) 2013; 346
Swaan, Mannaerts, Scheltema (R50) 2018; 7
Emamaullee, Bowdish, Yan (R94) 2020; 256
Harris, Taylor, Thielke (R39) 2009; 42
Pennell, Hirst, Campbell (R26) 2016; 103
Rogers, Hutchison, McNair (R20) 2019; 269
Pennell, Hirst, Sedrakyan (R29) 2016; 28
van Kollenburg, van Riel, Bloemen (R74) 2020; 9
Graff, Portalez, Lusque (R48) 2018; 102
Ergina, Barkun, McCulloch (R32) 2013; 346
Cook, McCulloch, Blazeby (R33) 2013; 346
Ives, Birchley, Huxtable (R16) 2023; 110
Gerullis, Schwartmann, Ecke (R68) 2017; 99
Mastroianni (R23) 2006; 16
Stöß, Steffani, Kohlhaw (R98) 2020; 20
Diez del Val, Loureiro, McCulloch (R60) 2015; 19
Greco, Pini, Alba (R44) 2016; 2
Chan, Tsang, Holsinger (R65) 2019; 94
Valerio, Dickinson, Ali (R67) 2014; 39
Gaboardi, Pini, Suardi (R58) 2019; 13
McCulloch, Altman, Campbell (R35) 2009; 374
Diepstraten, Verkooijen, van Diest (R42) 2011; 11
Muskens, Diederen, Senders (R6) 2017; 159
Birchley, Ives, Huxtable (R19) 2020; 28
Hirst, Agha, Rosin (R31) 2013; 11
Cousins, Blencowe, Blazeby (R37) 2019; 9
Sedrakyan, Campbell, Merino (R3) 2016; 353
Gale, Heath, Cameron (R28) 2013; 13
Barski, Gerullis, Ecke (R78) 2015; 68
Kirkham, Main, Jones (R1) 2020; 107
Poulin, Austen, Kortbeek (R15) 2012; 19
Pathak, Main, Blencowe (R2) 2021; 273
Currie, Blazeby, Suzuki (R69) 2019; 21
Glasbey, Ademuyiwa, Adisa (R97) 2021; 22
Rogers, Lotz, Hutchison (R24) 2014; 259
Lotz (R82) 2013; 34
Sood, McCulloch, Dahm (R72) 2016; 25
Diepstraten (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.42) 2011; 11
Zaki (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.25) 2018; 114
Vijayan (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.87) 2020; 36
Stöß (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.98) 2020; 20
Pennell (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.26) 2016; 103
Sedrakyan (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.3) 2016; 353
Birchley (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.10) 2019; 19
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.40
Solari (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.41) 2011; 46
Chan (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.65) 2019; 94
Versteeg (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.62) 2018; 8
Mannaerts (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.63) 2018; 18
Macefield (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.27) 2020; 4
Rogers (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.20) 2019; 269
Stefanidis (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.89) 2014; 28
Stenstra (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.55) 2019; 32
Bus (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.47) 2016; 196
Sharma (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.70) 2019; 67
Ives (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.16) 2023; 110
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.51
McCulloch (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.30) 2013; 346
Hutchison (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.21) 2015; 262
Kirkham (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.1) 2020; 107
Hallmann (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.66) 2017; 5
Kaouk (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.59) 2014; 66
Breda (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.46) 2018; 4
Currie (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.69) 2019; 21
Currie (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.5) 2015; 102
Jain (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.18) 2020; 168
Lotz (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.82) 2013; 34
Goh (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.53) 2020; 90
Barski (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.61) 2017; 39
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.67
Joukhadar (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.79) 2016; 2016
Khachane (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.8) 2018; 57
Sood (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.72) 2016; 25
Emamaullee (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.94) 2020; 256
Rischmann (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.45) 2017; 71
Barski (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.78) 2015; 68
Inoue (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.54) 2016; 401
Harvey (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.75) 2020; 10
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.76
Ergina (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.32) 2013; 346
Pathak (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.2) 2021; 273
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.80
Barentsz (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.64) 2015; 14
Danjoux (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.12) 2007; 7
Banagala (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.73) 2018; 18
van Kollenburg (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.74) 2020; 9
Menon (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.71) 2014; 65
Gaboardi (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.58) 2019; 13
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.88
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.86
Song (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.85) 2010; 14
Gerullis (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.68) 2017; 99
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.91
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.90
Dumont (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.52) 2020; 34
Gerullis (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.56) 2017; 45
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.15
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.13
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.14
Saglam (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.81) 2014; 66
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.17
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.95
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.96
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.93
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.11
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.97
Graff (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.48) 2018; 102
Mastroianni (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.23) 2006; 16
Swaan (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.50) 2018; 7
Villers (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.77) 2017; 72
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.24
Gale (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.28) 2013; 13
Greco (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.44) 2016; 2
Gerullis (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.57) 2017; 34
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.29
Birchley (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.19) 2020; 28
Liem (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.49) 2018; 7
Ross (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.84) 2009; 6
Elliott (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.92) 2021; 11
Minervini (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.43) 2018; 121
Harris (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.38) 2019; 95
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.7
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.35
Muskens (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.6) 2017; 159
Tradewell (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.9) 2019; 123
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.36
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.39
Hasenboehler (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.83) 2007; 1
Cook (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.33) 2013; 346
Diez del Val (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.60) 2015; 19
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.34
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.31
Zahra (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.22) 2020; 10
Cousins (2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.37) 2019; 9
2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.4
References_xml – volume: 5
  start-page: 123
  year: 2017
  ident: R66
  article-title: Successful evacuation of large Perirenal Hematoma after Extracorporeal shock wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) - step 1 of the IDEAL recommendations of surgical innovation
  publication-title: Clin Case Rep
  doi: 10.1002/ccr3.792
– volume: 38
  start-page: 605
  year: 2013
  ident: R11
  article-title: Innovative surgery and the precautionary principle
  publication-title: J Med Philos
  doi: 10.1093/jmp/jht047
– volume: 18
  year: 2018
  ident: R63
  article-title: Multiparametric ultrasound: evaluation of Greyscale, shear wave Elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for prostate cancer detection and localization in correlation to radical Prostatectomy specimens
  publication-title: BMC Urol
  doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0409-5
– volume: 99
  start-page: 69
  year: 2017
  ident: R68
  article-title: Transvesical Suprapubic externalization of Ureteral Stents - introduction of a surgical innovation at the development stage
  publication-title: Urol Int
  doi: 10.1159/000458709
– volume: 374
  start-page: 1089
  year: 2009
  ident: R34
  article-title: Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7
– volume: 25
  start-page: 158
  year: 2016
  ident: R72
  article-title: Ontogeny of a surgical technique: Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.12.061
– year: 2020
  ident: R96
  article-title: Clinical trials suspended in UK to Prioritise COVID-19 studies and free up staff
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1172
– volume: 16
  start-page: 351
  year: 2006
  ident: R23
  article-title: Liability, regulation and policy in surgical innovation: the cutting edge of research and therapy
  publication-title: Health Matrix Clevel
– volume: 7
  year: 2007
  ident: R12
  article-title: Adoption of an innovation to repair aortic aneurysms at a Canadian hospital: a qualitative case study and evaluation
  publication-title: BMC Health Serv Res
  doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-182
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: R64
  article-title: Sentinel lymph node localization with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and an I-125 seed: an ideal prospective development study
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.019
– volume: 107
  start-page: 44
  year: 2020
  ident: R1
  article-title: Systematic review of the introduction and evaluation of magnetic augmentation of the lower Oesophageal sphincter for Gastro-Oesophageal reflux disease
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.11391
– volume: 34
  start-page: 447
  year: 2013
  ident: R82
  article-title: Surgical innovation as Sui Generis surgical research
  publication-title: Theor Med Bioeth
  doi: 10.1007/s11017-013-9272-2
– volume: 123
  start-page: 1078
  year: 2019
  ident: R9
  article-title: Use of the IDEAL framework in the Urological literature: where are we in 2018
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1111/bju.14676
– volume: 256
  start-page: 76
  year: 2020
  ident: R94
  article-title: Rapid adaptation of a surgical research unit to conduct clinical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic
  publication-title: J Surg Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.049
– volume: 196
  start-page: 1749
  year: 2016
  ident: R47
  article-title: Optical coherence tomography as a tool for in vivo staging and grading of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A study of diagnostic accuracy
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.117
– volume: 10
  year: 2020
  ident: R75
  article-title: The pre-BRA (pre-pectoral breast reconstruction evaluation) feasibility study: protocol for a mixed-methods IDEAL 2A/2B prospective cohort study to determine the safety and effectiveness of Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction
  publication-title: BMJ Open
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033641
– volume: 28
  start-page: 73
  year: 2020
  ident: R19
  article-title: Conceptualising surgical innovation: an Eliminativist proposal
  publication-title: Health Care Anal
  doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00380-y
– volume: 2
  start-page: 319
  year: 2016
  ident: R44
  article-title: Minilaparoendoscopic single-site Pyeloplasty: the best compromise between surgeon’s Ergonomy and patient’s Cosmesis (IDEAL phase 2A)
  publication-title: Eur Urol Focus
  doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2015.09.001
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1004
  year: 2019
  ident: R69
  article-title: Evaluation of an early-stage innovation for full-thickness Excision of benign Colonic polyps using the IDEAL framework
  publication-title: Colorectal Dis
  doi: 10.1111/codi.14650
– volume: 6
  ident: R76
  article-title: Irreversible electroporation for the ablation of renal cell carcinoma: A prospective, human, in vivo study protocol (ideal phase 2b)
  publication-title: JMIR Res Protoc
  doi: 10.2196/resprot.6725
– volume: 259
  start-page: 273
  year: 2014
  ident: R24
  article-title: Identifying surgical innovation: a qualitative study of Surgeons' views
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31829ccc5f
– volume: 19
  start-page: 25
  year: 2019
  ident: R10
  article-title: Have we made progress in identifying (surgical) innovation
  publication-title: Am J Bioeth
  doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1602181
– volume: 346
  year: 2013
  ident: R32
  article-title: IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3011
– volume: 28
  start-page: 141
  year: 2016
  ident: R29
  article-title: Adapting the IDEAL framework and recommendations for medical device evaluation: A modified Delphi survey
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.082
– volume: 27
  start-page: 930
  year: 2003
  ident: R14
  article-title: Introducing new technologies: protecting subjects of surgical innovation and research
  publication-title: World J Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-7096-3
– volume: 98
  start-page: 544
  year: 2011
  ident: R51
  article-title: Demonstration of the IDEAL recommendations for evaluating and reporting surgical innovation in minimally invasive Oesophagectomy
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.7387
– volume: 13
  start-page: 215
  year: 2019
  ident: R58
  article-title: Robotic Laparoendoscopic single-site radical Prostatectomy (R-LESS-RP) with daVinci single-site (R) platform. concept and evolution of the technique following an IDEAL phase 1
  publication-title: J Robot Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0839-9
– volume: 109
  start-page: 1004
  year: 2022
  ident: R88
  article-title: Healthcare organization policy recommendations for the governance of surgical innovation: review of NHS policies
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac223
– volume: 4
  start-page: 954
  year: 2018
  ident: R46
  article-title: Correlation between confocal laser Endomicroscopy (Cellvizio(®)) and histological grading of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A step forward for a better selection of patients suitable for conservative management
  publication-title: Eur Urol Focus
  doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.008
– volume: 401
  start-page: 1123
  year: 2016
  ident: R54
  article-title: Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy combined with a novel self-assessment system and feedback discussion: a phase 1 surgical trial following the IDEAL guidelines
  publication-title: Langenbecks Arch Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1466-4
– volume: 57
  start-page: 84
  year: 2018
  ident: R8
  article-title: Appraising the uptake and use of the IDEAL framework and recommendations: A review of the literature
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.07.008
– volume: 121
  start-page: 313
  year: 2018
  ident: R43
  article-title: Florence Robotic Intracorporeal Neobladder (Florin): a new Reconfiguration strategy developed following the IDEAL guidelines
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1111/bju.14077
– volume: 269
  start-page: 211
  year: 2019
  ident: R4
  article-title: No surgical innovation without evaluation: evolution and further development of the IDEAL framework and recommendations
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002794
– volume: 10
  year: 2020
  ident: R22
  article-title: Discussing surgical innovation with patients: a qualitative study of Surgeons' and governance representatives' views
  publication-title: BMJ Open
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035251
– volume: 353
  year: 2016
  ident: R3
  article-title: IDEAL-D: a rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2372
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1038
  year: 2013
  ident: R31
  article-title: How can we improve surgical research and innovation?: the IDEAL framework for action
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.09.016
– volume: 46
  start-page: e5
  year: 2011
  ident: R41
  article-title: Enhancing safety of Laparoscopic vascular control for neonatal Sacrococcygeal Teratoma
  publication-title: J Pediatr Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.01.022
– volume: 269
  start-page: 229
  year: 2019
  ident: R20
  article-title: Ethical issues across the IDEAL stages of surgical innovation
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003106
– volume: 36
  start-page: 186
  year: 2020
  ident: R87
  article-title: Autologous Pericardial aortic valve reconstruction: early results and comparison with mechanical valve replacement
  publication-title: Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s12055-019-00855-6
– volume: 168
  start-page: 238
  year: 2020
  ident: R18
  article-title: A model for the institutional adoption of innovative surgical techniques
  publication-title: Surgery
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.03.018
– volume: 4
  start-page: 1072
  year: 2020
  ident: R27
  article-title: Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for new surgical procedures and devices: a systematic review of IDEAL/IDEAL-D studies to inform development of a core outcome set
  publication-title: BJS Open
  doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50358
– volume: 71
  start-page: 267
  year: 2017
  ident: R45
  article-title: Focal high intensity focused ultrasound of unilateral localized prostate cancer: A prospective Multicentric Hemiablation study of 111 patients
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.039
– volume: 18
  year: 2018
  ident: R73
  article-title: Efficacy of irrigation tubes in the management of para Rectal cavities associated with complex Fistula-in-Ano.BMC surgery
  publication-title: BMC Surg
  doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0430-3
– volume: 14
  year: 2010
  ident: R85
  article-title: Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
  publication-title: Health Technol Assess
  doi: 10.3310/hta14080
– volume: 346
  year: 2013
  ident: R30
  article-title: IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3012
– volume: 20
  year: 2020
  ident: R98
  article-title: The COVID-19 pandemic: impact on surgical departments of non-University hospitals
  publication-title: BMC Surg
  doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00970-x
– volume: 7
  year: 2018
  ident: R49
  article-title: Confocal laser Endomicroscopy for the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma in the bladder and the upper urinary tract: protocols for two prospective Explorative studies
  publication-title: JMIR Res Protoc
  doi: 10.2196/resprot.8862
– volume: 3
  start-page: 89
  year: 2016
  ident: R13
  article-title: Surgical innovation and safety: Femoroacetabular Impingement and the IDEAL collaborative framework
  publication-title: J Hip Preserv Surg
  doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnv074
– volume: 66
  start-page: 1092
  year: 2014
  ident: R81
  article-title: A new robot for flexible Ureteroscopy: development and early clinical results (IDEAL stage 1-2B)
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.047
– volume: 66
  start-page: 1033
  year: 2014
  ident: R59
  article-title: A novel Robotic system for single-port urologic surgery: first clinical investigation
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.039
– volume: 374
  start-page: 1097
  year: 2009
  ident: R7
  article-title: Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2
– volume: 7
  year: 2018
  ident: R50
  article-title: Confocal laser Endomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: A needle-based, in vivo feasibility study protocol (ideal phase 2A)
  publication-title: JMIR Res Protoc
  doi: 10.2196/resprot.9813
– volume: 67
  start-page: 18
  year: 2019
  ident: R70
  article-title: Endoscopic stabilization device evaluation using IDEAL framework: A quality improvement study
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.02.010
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2789
  year: 2020
  ident: R52
  article-title: Cytoreductive surgery plus Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy by Laparoscopy via a single-port approach for low-grade peritoneal malignancy
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07492-w
– volume: 206
  start-page: 1204
  year: 2008
  ident: R17
  article-title: Responsible development and application of surgical innovations: a position statement of the society of University Surgeons
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.02.011
– volume: 68
  start-page: 459
  year: 2015
  ident: R78
  article-title: Repair of a Vesico-vaginal Fistula with amniotic membrane - step 1 of the IDEAL recommendations of surgical innovation
  publication-title: CEJU
  doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.683
– volume: 2016
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: R79
  article-title: Challenges of longevity: safety of vaginal and Laparoscopic Urogynecological procedures in Septuagenarians and older patients
  publication-title: BioMed Research International
  doi: 10.1155/2016/5184595
– volume: 28
  start-page: 2257
  year: 2014
  ident: R89
  article-title: SAGES guidelines for the introduction of new technology and techniques
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3587-6
– volume: 1
  year: 2007
  ident: R83
  article-title: Bias towards publishing positive results in orthopedic and general surgery: a patient safety issue
  publication-title: Patient Saf Surg
  doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-1-4
– volume: 65
  start-page: 1001
  year: 2014
  ident: R71
  article-title: Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia: evolution of a novel procedure utilizing the IDEAL guidelines (IDEAL phase 0 and 1)
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.011
– volume: 374
  start-page: 1105
  year: 2009
  ident: R35
  article-title: No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8
– volume: 94
  start-page: 101
  year: 2019
  ident: R65
  article-title: Prospective clinical trial to evaluate safety and feasibility of using a single port flexible Robotic system for Transoral head and neck surgery
  publication-title: Oral Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.05.018
– volume: 262
  start-page: 949
  year: 2015
  ident: R21
  article-title: Getting clearer about surgical innovation A new definition and a new tool to support responsible practice
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001174
– volume: 39
  start-page: 249
  year: 2017
  ident: R61
  article-title: Transvaginal PVDF-mesh for Cystocele repair: A cohort study
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.006
– volume: 6
  year: 2009
  ident: R84
  article-title: Trial publication after registration in Clinicaltrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis
  publication-title: PLoS Med
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000144
– volume: 34
  start-page: 995
  year: 2017
  ident: R57
  article-title: Protocol for a randomized phase II trial for mesh optimization by Autologous plasma coating in Prolapse repair: IDEAL stage 3
  publication-title: Adv Ther
  doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0493-z
– volume: 110
  start-page: 888
  year: 2023
  ident: R16
  article-title: “Hiding behind 'innovation': the case for regulated risk assessment in surgery”
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac347
– volume: 11
  start-page: 247
  year: 2011
  ident: R42
  article-title: Radiofrequency-assisted intact specimen biopsy of breast tumors: critical evaluation according to the IDEAL recommendations
  publication-title: Cancer Imaging
  doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2011.0034
– volume: 102
  start-page: 903
  year: 2018
  ident: R48
  article-title: IDEAL 2A phase II study of Ultrafocal Brachytherapy for Low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer
  publication-title: Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.066
– volume: 11
  year: 2021
  ident: R92
  article-title: Using qualitative research methods to understand how surgical procedures and devices are introduced into NHS hospitals: the Lotus study protocol
  publication-title: BMJ Open
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049234
– volume: 90
  start-page: 1092
  year: 2020
  ident: R53
  article-title: Critical appraisal of the learning curve of minimally invasive hepatectomy: experience with the first 200 cases of a Southeast Asian early Adopter
  publication-title: ANZ J Surg
  doi: 10.1111/ans.15683
– volume: 72
  start-page: 333
  year: 2017
  ident: R77
  article-title: Partial Prostatectomy for anterior cancer: short-term oncologic and functional outcomes
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.057
– volume: 8
  year: 2018
  ident: R62
  article-title: Stereotactic radiotherapy followed by surgical stabilization within 24 H for unstable spinal metastases; A stage I/IIA study according to the IDEAL framework
  publication-title: Front Oncol
  doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00626
– volume: 273
  start-page: 882
  year: 2021
  ident: R2
  article-title: A systematic review of minimally invasive Trans-Thoracic liver resection to examine intervention description, governance, and outcome reporting of an innovative technique
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003748
– volume: 20
  start-page: 459
  year: 2013
  ident: R80
  article-title: Stages and evaluation of surgical innovation: A clinical example of the Ileo Neorectal anastomosis after ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous Polyposis
  publication-title: Surg Innov
  doi: 10.1177/1553350612468959
– volume: 42
  start-page: 377
  year: 2009
  ident: R39
  article-title: Research electronic data capture (Redcap)--A Metadata-driven methodology and Workflow process for providing Translational research Informatics support
  publication-title: J Biomed Inform
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
– volume: 159
  start-page: 1957
  year: 2017
  ident: R6
  article-title: Innovation in Neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review
  publication-title: Acta Neurochir (Wien)
  doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3280-3
– volume: 39
  start-page: 57
  year: 2014
  ident: R67
  article-title: A prospective development study investigating focal irreversible Electroporation in men with Localised prostate cancer: Nanoknife Electroporation ablation trial (NEAT)
  publication-title: Contemp Clin Trials
  doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.07.006
– volume: 13
  year: 2013
  ident: R28
  article-title: Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
  publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
– volume: 95
  year: 2019
  ident: R38
  article-title: The Redcap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners
  publication-title: J Biomed Inform
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1507
  year: 2021
  ident: R97
  article-title: Effect of COVID-19 pandemic Lockdowns on planned cancer surgery for 15 tumour types in 61 countries: an international, prospective, cohort study
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00493-9
– volume: 114
  start-page: e1038
  year: 2018
  ident: R25
  article-title: Defining innovation in Neurosurgery: results from an international survey
  publication-title: World Neurosurgery
  doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.142
– volume: 9
  year: 2019
  ident: R37
  article-title: What is an invasive procedure? A definition to inform study design, evidence synthesis and research tracking
  publication-title: BMJ Open
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028576
– volume: 9
  year: 2020
  ident: R74
  article-title: Transperineal laser ablation treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign Prostatic obstruction: protocol for a prospective in vivo pilot study
  publication-title: JMIR Res Protoc
  doi: 10.2196/15687
– volume: 45
  start-page: 714
  year: 2017
  ident: R56
  article-title: Retrospective analysis of a surgical innovation using the IDEAL framework: radical cystectomy with epidural anaesthesia
  publication-title: J Int Med Res
  doi: 10.1177/0300060516684721
– volume: 102
  start-page: e108
  year: 2015
  ident: R5
  article-title: Systematic review of surgical innovation reporting in Laparoendoscopic Colonic Polyp resection
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.9675
– volume: 103
  start-page: 607
  year: 2016
  ident: R26
  article-title: Practical guide to the idea, development and exploration stages of the IDEAL framework and recommendations
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.10115
– volume: 19
  start-page: 187
  year: 2012
  ident: R15
  article-title: New technologies and surgical innovation: five years of a local health technology assessment program in a surgical Department
  publication-title: Surg Innov
  doi: 10.1177/1553350611421916
– volume: 346
  year: 2013
  ident: R33
  article-title: IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2820
– volume: 32
  year: 2019
  ident: R55
  article-title: Evolution of the surgical technique of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy: description according to the IDEAL framework
  publication-title: Dis Esophagus
  doi: 10.1093/dote/doy079
– volume: 19
  start-page: 104
  year: 2015
  ident: R60
  article-title: The IDEAL prospective development study format for reporting surgical innovations. An illustrative case study of Robotic Oesophagectomy
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.035
– volume: 34
  start-page: 447
  year: 2013
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.82
  article-title: Surgical innovation as Sui Generis surgical research
  publication-title: Theor Med Bioeth
  doi: 10.1007/s11017-013-9272-2
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.90
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.97
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00493-9
– volume: 66
  start-page: 1033
  year: 2014
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.59
  article-title: A novel Robotic system for single-port urologic surgery: first clinical investigation
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.039
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.96
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1172
– volume: 2016
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.79
  article-title: Challenges of longevity: safety of vaginal and Laparoscopic Urogynecological procedures in Septuagenarians and older patients
  publication-title: BioMed Research International
  doi: 10.1155/2016/5184595
– volume: 121
  start-page: 313
  year: 2018
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.43
  article-title: Florence Robotic Intracorporeal Neobladder (Florin): a new Reconfiguration strategy developed following the IDEAL guidelines
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1111/bju.14077
– volume: 65
  start-page: 1001
  year: 2014
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.71
  article-title: Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia: evolution of a novel procedure utilizing the IDEAL guidelines (IDEAL phase 0 and 1)
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.011
– volume: 273
  start-page: 882
  year: 2021
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.2
  article-title: A systematic review of minimally invasive Trans-Thoracic liver resection to examine intervention description, governance, and outcome reporting of an innovative technique
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003748
– volume: 11
  start-page: 247
  year: 2011
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.42
  article-title: Radiofrequency-assisted intact specimen biopsy of breast tumors: critical evaluation according to the IDEAL recommendations
  publication-title: Cancer Imaging
– volume: 7
  year: 2018
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.49
  article-title: Confocal laser Endomicroscopy for the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma in the bladder and the upper urinary tract: protocols for two prospective Explorative studies
  publication-title: JMIR Res Protoc
  doi: 10.2196/resprot.8862
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.17
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.02.011
– volume: 28
  start-page: 2257
  year: 2014
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.89
  article-title: SAGES guidelines for the introduction of new technology and techniques
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3587-6
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.13
  doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnv074
– volume: 11
  year: 2021
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.92
  article-title: Using qualitative research methods to understand how surgical procedures and devices are introduced into NHS hospitals: the Lotus study protocol
  publication-title: BMJ Open
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049234
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.95
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.88
  doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac223
– volume: 14
  year: 2010
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.85
  article-title: Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
  publication-title: Health Technol Assess
  doi: 10.3310/hta14080
– volume: 99
  start-page: 69
  year: 2017
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.68
  article-title: Transvesical Suprapubic externalization of Ureteral Stents - introduction of a surgical innovation at the development stage
  publication-title: Urol Int
  doi: 10.1159/000458709
– volume: 66
  start-page: 1092
  year: 2014
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.81
  article-title: A new robot for flexible Ureteroscopy: development and early clinical results (IDEAL stage 1-2B)
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.047
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.24
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31829ccc5f
– volume: 107
  start-page: 44
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.1
  article-title: Systematic review of the introduction and evaluation of magnetic augmentation of the lower Oesophageal sphincter for Gastro-Oesophageal reflux disease
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.11391
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.31
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.09.016
– volume: 45
  start-page: 714
  year: 2017
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.56
  article-title: Retrospective analysis of a surgical innovation using the IDEAL framework: radical cystectomy with epidural anaesthesia
  publication-title: J Int Med Res
  doi: 10.1177/0300060516684721
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.40
– volume: 9
  year: 2019
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.37
  article-title: What is an invasive procedure? A definition to inform study design, evidence synthesis and research tracking
  publication-title: BMJ Open
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028576
– volume: 114
  start-page: e1038
  year: 2018
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.25
  article-title: Defining innovation in Neurosurgery: results from an international survey
  publication-title: World Neurosurgery
  doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.142
– volume: 18
  year: 2018
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.63
  article-title: Multiparametric ultrasound: evaluation of Greyscale, shear wave Elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for prostate cancer detection and localization in correlation to radical Prostatectomy specimens
  publication-title: BMC Urol
  doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0409-5
– volume: 8
  year: 2018
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.62
  article-title: Stereotactic radiotherapy followed by surgical stabilization within 24 H for unstable spinal metastases; A stage I/IIA study according to the IDEAL framework
  publication-title: Front Oncol
  doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00626
– volume: 68
  start-page: 459
  year: 2015
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.78
  article-title: Repair of a Vesico-vaginal Fistula with amniotic membrane - step 1 of the IDEAL recommendations of surgical innovation
  publication-title: CEJU
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.29
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.082
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.34
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7
– volume: 1
  year: 2007
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.83
  article-title: Bias towards publishing positive results in orthopedic and general surgery: a patient safety issue
  publication-title: Patient Saf Surg
  doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-1-4
– volume: 7
  year: 2018
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.50
  article-title: Confocal laser Endomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: A needle-based, in vivo feasibility study protocol (ideal phase 2A)
  publication-title: JMIR Res Protoc
  doi: 10.2196/resprot.9813
– volume: 269
  start-page: 229
  year: 2019
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.20
  article-title: Ethical issues across the IDEAL stages of surgical innovation
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003106
– volume: 20
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.98
  article-title: The COVID-19 pandemic: impact on surgical departments of non-University hospitals
  publication-title: BMC Surg
  doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00970-x
– volume: 159
  start-page: 1957
  year: 2017
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.6
  article-title: Innovation in Neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review
  publication-title: Acta Neurochir (Wien)
  doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3280-3
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2789
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.52
  article-title: Cytoreductive surgery plus Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy by Laparoscopy via a single-port approach for low-grade peritoneal malignancy
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07492-w
– volume: 4
  start-page: 1072
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.27
  article-title: Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for new surgical procedures and devices: a systematic review of IDEAL/IDEAL-D studies to inform development of a core outcome set
  publication-title: BJS Open
  doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50358
– volume: 25
  start-page: 158
  year: 2016
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.72
  article-title: Ontogeny of a surgical technique: Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.12.061
– volume: 4
  start-page: 954
  year: 2018
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.46
  article-title: Correlation between confocal laser Endomicroscopy (Cellvizio(®)) and histological grading of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A step forward for a better selection of patients suitable for conservative management
  publication-title: Eur Urol Focus
  doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.008
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.7
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2
– volume: 34
  start-page: 995
  year: 2017
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.57
  article-title: Protocol for a randomized phase II trial for mesh optimization by Autologous plasma coating in Prolapse repair: IDEAL stage 3
  publication-title: Adv Ther
  doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0493-z
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.93
– volume: 13
  start-page: 215
  year: 2019
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.58
  article-title: Robotic Laparoendoscopic single-site radical Prostatectomy (R-LESS-RP) with daVinci single-site (R) platform. concept and evolution of the technique following an IDEAL phase 1
  publication-title: J Robot Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0839-9
– volume: 110
  start-page: 888
  year: 2023
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.16
  article-title: “Hiding behind 'innovation': the case for regulated risk assessment in surgery”
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac347
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.76
  doi: 10.2196/resprot.6725
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.36
– volume: 102
  start-page: 903
  year: 2018
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.48
  article-title: IDEAL 2A phase II study of Ultrafocal Brachytherapy for Low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer
  publication-title: Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.066
– volume: 19
  start-page: 104
  year: 2015
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.60
  article-title: The IDEAL prospective development study format for reporting surgical innovations. An illustrative case study of Robotic Oesophagectomy
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.035
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.14
  doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-7096-3
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.11
  doi: 10.1093/jmp/jht047
– volume: 6
  year: 2009
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.84
  article-title: Trial publication after registration in Clinicaltrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis
  publication-title: PLoS Med
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000144
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.39
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
– volume: 10
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.75
  article-title: The pre-BRA (pre-pectoral breast reconstruction evaluation) feasibility study: protocol for a mixed-methods IDEAL 2A/2B prospective cohort study to determine the safety and effectiveness of Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction
  publication-title: BMJ Open
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033641
– volume: 346
  year: 2013
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.30
  article-title: IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3012
– volume: 16
  start-page: 351
  year: 2006
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.23
  article-title: Liability, regulation and policy in surgical innovation: the cutting edge of research and therapy
  publication-title: Health Matrix Clevel
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1004
  year: 2019
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.69
  article-title: Evaluation of an early-stage innovation for full-thickness Excision of benign Colonic polyps using the IDEAL framework
  publication-title: Colorectal Dis
  doi: 10.1111/codi.14650
– volume: 123
  start-page: 1078
  year: 2019
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.9
  article-title: Use of the IDEAL framework in the Urological literature: where are we in 2018
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1111/bju.14676
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.35
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8
– volume: 401
  start-page: 1123
  year: 2016
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.54
  article-title: Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy combined with a novel self-assessment system and feedback discussion: a phase 1 surgical trial following the IDEAL guidelines
  publication-title: Langenbecks Arch Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1466-4
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.91
– volume: 71
  start-page: 267
  year: 2017
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.45
  article-title: Focal high intensity focused ultrasound of unilateral localized prostate cancer: A prospective Multicentric Hemiablation study of 111 patients
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.039
– volume: 19
  start-page: 25
  year: 2019
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.10
  article-title: Have we made progress in identifying (surgical) innovation
  publication-title: Am J Bioeth
  doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1602181
– volume: 7
  year: 2007
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.12
  article-title: Adoption of an innovation to repair aortic aneurysms at a Canadian hospital: a qualitative case study and evaluation
  publication-title: BMC Health Serv Res
  doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-182
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.80
  doi: 10.1177/1553350612468959
– volume: 346
  year: 2013
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.33
  article-title: IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2820
– volume: 102
  start-page: e108
  year: 2015
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.5
  article-title: Systematic review of surgical innovation reporting in Laparoendoscopic Colonic Polyp resection
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.9675
– volume: 103
  start-page: 607
  year: 2016
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.26
  article-title: Practical guide to the idea, development and exploration stages of the IDEAL framework and recommendations
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.10115
– volume: 353
  year: 2016
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.3
  article-title: IDEAL-D: a rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2372
– volume: 262
  start-page: 949
  year: 2015
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.21
  article-title: Getting clearer about surgical innovation A new definition and a new tool to support responsible practice
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001174
– volume: 2
  start-page: 319
  year: 2016
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.44
  article-title: Minilaparoendoscopic single-site Pyeloplasty: the best compromise between surgeon’s Ergonomy and patient’s Cosmesis (IDEAL phase 2A)
  publication-title: Eur Urol Focus
  doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2015.09.001
– volume: 346
  year: 2013
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.32
  article-title: IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3011
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.51
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.7387
– volume: 168
  start-page: 238
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.18
  article-title: A model for the institutional adoption of innovative surgical techniques
  publication-title: Surgery
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.03.018
– volume: 57
  start-page: 84
  year: 2018
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.8
  article-title: Appraising the uptake and use of the IDEAL framework and recommendations: A review of the literature
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.07.008
– volume: 72
  start-page: 333
  year: 2017
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.77
  article-title: Partial Prostatectomy for anterior cancer: short-term oncologic and functional outcomes
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.057
– volume: 32
  year: 2019
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.55
  article-title: Evolution of the surgical technique of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy: description according to the IDEAL framework
  publication-title: Dis Esophagus
  doi: 10.1093/dote/doy079
– volume: 9
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.74
  article-title: Transperineal laser ablation treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign Prostatic obstruction: protocol for a prospective in vivo pilot study
  publication-title: JMIR Res Protoc
  doi: 10.2196/15687
– volume: 46
  start-page: e5
  year: 2011
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.41
  article-title: Enhancing safety of Laparoscopic vascular control for neonatal Sacrococcygeal Teratoma
  publication-title: J Pediatr Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.01.022
– volume: 95
  year: 2019
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.38
  article-title: The Redcap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners
  publication-title: J Biomed Inform
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
– volume: 18
  year: 2018
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.73
  article-title: Efficacy of irrigation tubes in the management of para Rectal cavities associated with complex Fistula-in-Ano.BMC surgery
  publication-title: BMC Surg
  doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0430-3
– volume: 39
  start-page: 249
  year: 2017
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.61
  article-title: Transvaginal PVDF-mesh for Cystocele repair: A cohort study
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.006
– volume: 5
  start-page: 123
  year: 2017
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.66
  article-title: Successful evacuation of large Perirenal Hematoma after Extracorporeal shock wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) - step 1 of the IDEAL recommendations of surgical innovation
  publication-title: Clin Case Rep
  doi: 10.1002/ccr3.792
– volume: 256
  start-page: 76
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.94
  article-title: Rapid adaptation of a surgical research unit to conduct clinical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic
  publication-title: J Surg Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.049
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.4
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002794
– volume: 28
  start-page: 73
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.19
  article-title: Conceptualising surgical innovation: an Eliminativist proposal
  publication-title: Health Care Anal
  doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00380-y
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.86
– volume: 13
  year: 2013
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.28
  article-title: Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
  publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.15
  doi: 10.1177/1553350611421916
– volume: 94
  start-page: 101
  year: 2019
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.65
  article-title: Prospective clinical trial to evaluate safety and feasibility of using a single port flexible Robotic system for Transoral head and neck surgery
  publication-title: Oral Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.05.018
– volume: 10
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.22
  article-title: Discussing surgical innovation with patients: a qualitative study of Surgeons' and governance representatives' views
  publication-title: BMJ Open
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035251
– ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.67
  doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.07.006
– volume: 90
  start-page: 1092
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.53
  article-title: Critical appraisal of the learning curve of minimally invasive hepatectomy: experience with the first 200 cases of a Southeast Asian early Adopter
  publication-title: ANZ J Surg
  doi: 10.1111/ans.15683
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.64
  article-title: Sentinel lymph node localization with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and an I-125 seed: an ideal prospective development study
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.019
– volume: 36
  start-page: 186
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.87
  article-title: Autologous Pericardial aortic valve reconstruction: early results and comparison with mechanical valve replacement
  publication-title: Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s12055-019-00855-6
– volume: 67
  start-page: 18
  year: 2019
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.70
  article-title: Endoscopic stabilization device evaluation using IDEAL framework: A quality improvement study
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.02.010
– volume: 196
  start-page: 1749
  year: 2016
  ident: 2024052411001928000_14.5.e079654.47
  article-title: Optical coherence tomography as a tool for in vivo staging and grading of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A study of diagnostic accuracy
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.117
SSID ssj0000459552
Score 2.3605888
Snippet ObjectivesThe development of new surgical procedures is fundamental to advancing patient care. The Idea, Developments, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term...
The development of new surgical procedures is fundamental to advancing patient care. The Idea, Developments, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term (IDEAL)...
Objectives The development of new surgical procedures is fundamental to advancing patient care. The Idea, Developments, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
bmj
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage e079654
SubjectTerms Humans
Innovations
Intervention
Qualitative Research
Research Design
Surgeons
Surgery
Surgical Procedures, Operative - standards
Systematic review
Systematic Reviews as Topic
Terminology
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagB8QFQXkF2spIHDhgNY7t2ObWwlYFAScq9RaNY1tspWZRu1vBT-Jf4rGzL4Tgwi1yJtE4M46_0Yy_IeQlaMNBhoZJEyWTNjoGKgqmvW2Utz1SjmG1xef29Ex-OFfnG62-sCas0AOXD3eoEj43zjVSeZAi4RkRFW9712vvYog9_n3TnrcRTOV_sFRWqWakGeKiPXSXF9iPimG7cFZr22IDgNtpdGtDyrz9fwKbv9dMbmxCJ_fJvRE90qOi9QNyKwy75M6nMT_-kPycfIfL3PKBJmBHN7LTdBbz0Pt3k6OPNC5Lsuh0yMMldYDPweDpmgIcH5uOjVNvQrq8Aax3p3nf84sUq7-h1xhTe7j6QcsJzSIKI9sJvgHomjCalsMyj8jZyeTL21M2NmNgTtp6zryupZOm5eCAhzoYp1sPvo4ge98kFCkUYIpShtrZGqVtb5QKvBdSxtqLx2RnmA3hKaE6gEsWSOAg4RfLwUTDtbMArQ8g-r4ir5JdunExXXc5ThFtN5qwQxN2xYQVeb00Xvet0HP8XfwYDbwSRW7tPJA8rhs9rvuXx1Vkb-keax0F8t6kGRlekRer22mpYv4FhjBboEyLikmtK_KkeNNKE-TkEQlrVsRs-dmWqtt3hunXTAfOETIn6Prsf0zuObmbvpfE-ohG7pGd-dUi7CfYNXcHeYX9AnePL4s
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Nb9QwELVokRAXxDeBgozEgQNWk9iObS6owFYFAScq7S0axzYsUpOyHxX8JP4lHse720Wot5UzWY3y7PiNZ_KGkBegdAXC10zoIJgwwTKQgTPlTC2d6VByDKstvjQnp-LjVE7zgdsil1Wu34npRe2GDs_IDzkKi8T9RFdvzn8y7BqF2dXcQmOPXEfpMgy-1FRtzlgiXTFS1llsqOLNoT37gV2pGDYNZ6UyDbYB2IujO9tSUu__H-X8t3Ly0lZ0fJvcyhySHo2g3yHXfH-X3Pics-T3yJ_JLzhLjR9opHf0Uo6aDiENfXg_OfpEw7owi876NDwmEPA-6B3dCoHjbbPcPvXCx58XgFXvNO1-bhUj9td0gZG1g_lvOn6nOZpC1jzBfwC6lY2m4ycz98np8eTruxOWWzIwK0y5ZE6VwgrdVGCh8qXXVjUOXBlAdK6OXJJLwESl8KU1JVqbTkvpq44LEUrHH5D9fuj9I0KVBxsRiJBGFmMq0EFXyhqAxnngXVeQlxGXNi-pRZuiFd60GcIWIWxHCAvyag1eez6KdFxt_hYB3piiwnYaGObf2rxgWxnjQm1tLaQDwSOP5kFWTWc75WzwIbp3sJ4eWx-3k7QgzzeX44LFLAz0flihTYOOCaUK8nCcTRtPUJmHR8ZZEL0zz3Zc3b3Sz74nUfAKiXMksI-v9usJuRmfhMD6h1ockP3lfOWfRlq1tM_S2vkL90EmIQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Nb9QwELXaIlW9IL4JFGQkDhwIJPE4TpAQKrBVQZQTK_UWjWO7LKJZ2O5W7U_iX-JxnN0uKohbYk-iSWYcv9FM3jD2FFWVI9gihcpBCrXTKUonUmXqQpq6Jcoxqrb4XB6M4eORPNpgQ1fU-AJPrwztqJ_UePb9xfnPizd-wb-OHUle6pNvNJVSJ_A0U3UpYZNd81uTol4OhxHvh08zyFqGLjxFBpB6KC8jE9Ff7rPDtoktRRSUyNz0AmvbV2D5vwqa_llheWnL2r_Brkesyfd657jJNmx3i20fxmz6bfZrdI4noUEE9zCQX8pl86kLQx_ej_Y-cTcUcPFJF4b7RANdh53hK8JwumwS26yeWX94hlQdz8MuaRY-sn_FTykCNzi74P3_nL0oRm4UugPyFb0073-tucPG-6Mv7w7S2Loh1VBn89SoDDRUZY4ac5vZSqvSoMkcQmsKjzmFREpogs10nZF03VZS2rwVAC4z4i7b6qadvc-4sqi9MTyU8GinzrFyVa50jVgai6JtE_bM26UZPKcJUY0om2jNhqzZ9NZM2PPBeM2Pnszj3-JvycBLUWLiDgPT2XETF3YjffxYaV2ANAjC423hZF62ulVGO-u8eruDe6x0FMSS45-oyhP2ZDntFzZla7Cz0wXJlKQYKJWwe703LTUZfDJh1Zqfram6PtNNvgby8JwAtge6D_7_tT1kO_4MqGaigF22NZ8t7CMPxeb6cVhevwH-mjGn
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Examining the application of the IDEAL framework in the reporting and evaluation of innovative invasive procedures: secondary qualitative analysis of a systematic review
URI https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/5/e079654.full
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38803251
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3059424281
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3061136477
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11129025
https://doaj.org/article/52598bb245da430993f516cbc7dbfefc
Volume 14
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELf2IU17QXxTGJWReOCBrHFsxzFv3egYiE4Ibag8RXZsQ5GWoq6d4E_iv-TOSdoVIcRL0joX69qz5d_5zr8j5LlRBTPCZ4kogkiEDjYxMvBEOZ1JpyukHMNsi7P89EK8m8jJFmHdWRh7-Q3LRh3CvTnRgBxN9WLAxEAOfKp0LsUh7kxvk12sTYL-lv58vtpWAYSiZayzk6VCJADWZcs1xHje9Z5gzfCk6Wyf7CEfCs8wVLkNAhsLVOTx_xv4_DOH8saidHKb3GrRJB025r9Dtnx9l-yN23j5PfJr9MNcxhIQFIAevRGtprMQm96-Hg3f09ClaNFpHZubUAK-Z2pH15Tg-Nq0LaR67eHjtcH8dxrXQbcE3_0VvUIf25n5T9qc2GxETct-gj0YuiaQps3hmfvk4mR0fnyatMUZEit0ukicSoUVRc6MNcynvrAqd8alwYjKZYAquTQYshQ-tTpFaV0VUnpWcSFC6vgDslPPav-IUOWNBWMAWAA8o5kpQsGU1cbkzhteVT3yAuxStpPrqox-C8_L1polWrNsrNkjLzvjld8buo5_ix-hgVeiyLUdG2bzL2U7dUsJHmJhbSakM4IDouZBsryylXI2-ADqHXTDY60jRx4c-EUF65Fnq8cwdTEeY2o_W6JMjooJpXrkYTOaVpp0Y7JHio1xtqHq5pN6-jXSgzOE0ABlH___3_aE7MM3gVkRmTggO4v50j8FsLWwfbKtJqofJ1mf7A6Px-NPcD8anX342I8bGHB9M2FwHYviN2O4LjM
linkProvider BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELbaIkEviGe7UMBIIHEgahLbcYKEUKFb7dJtT620tzCObVikZss-Cv1JXPiNzOSx20Wot94iZxKNMmPP58z4G8ZegU4jkC4OZOplIDNvAlBeBNpmsbJZQZRjVG1xnPRO5eehGq6xP-1ZGCqrbNfEaqG244L-ke8KIhbBeJJGH85_BNQ1irKrbQuN2i0O3eVP3LJN3_f30b6v4_ige_KpFzRdBQIjs3AWWB1KI9MkAgORC11qdGLBhh5kYWOEQ0IB5dqkC00WknRWpEq5qBBS-tAKfO86u4WBN6QSQj3Ui386CI8ypeKG3CgSya45-05dsAJqUh6EOkuo7cA6jq6EwapbwP8g7r-VmldC38E9drfBrHyvdrL7bM2VD9jtoyYr_5D97v6Cs6rRBEc4ya_kxPnYV0P9_e7egPu2EIyPymq4TljQc1BaviQep8dGTbvWC4eXF0BV9ryKtnY-cdN3fEo7eQuTS16fC61FoeFYoTcAX9JU8_qIziN2eiPGesw2ynHpthnXDgxaAF0IUVMWQerTSJsMILEORFF02Bu0S95M4Wle7Y5EkjcmzMmEeW3CDnvbGi8_r0lBrhf_SAZeiBKjdzUwnnzNmwUiV7gPTY2JpbIgBeJ24VWUFKbQ1njnUb2d1j2WOi4nRYe9XNzGBYKyPlC68ZxkElJMat1hW7U3LTQhJiCBCLfD0hU_W1F19U45-laRkEcE1BEwP7lerxfsTu_kaJAP-seHT9kmfhVJtRex3GEbs8ncPUNINzPPq3nE2Zebnrh_AQlWYpY
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELbaIlVcEG9SChgJJA5EG8d2nCAhVNhddWmpOFBpb8GObdhKTco-Cv1J_AV-HTN57HYR6q23yJlEo8yM_Tkz_oaQF1qlTAsXhyL1IhSZN6GWnofKZrG0WYGUY1htcZTsH4uPYzneIH-6szBYVtnNifVEbasC_5H3OBKLwHqSsp5vyyI-94fvzn6E2EEKM61dO43GRQ7cxU_Yvs3ejvpg65dxPBx8-bAfth0GQiOyaB5aFQkj0oRpo5mLXGpUYrWNvBaFjQEacakx7yZcZLIIpbMildKxggvhI8vhvZvkBogx7J6gxmr5fwegUiZl3BIdMZ70zOkJdsQKsWF5GKkswRYEmzC6tiTWnQP-B3f_rdq8tAwOb5NbLX6le43D3SEbrrxLtj-1Gfp75Pfglz6tm05QgJb0Un6cVr4eGvUHe4fUd0VhdFLWw03yAp_TpaUrEnJ8bNK2bj13cHmuseKe1iuvXUzd7A2d4a7e6ukFbc6INqK65VvBN2i6oqymzXGd--T4Woz1gGyVVekeEaqcNmABcCdAUBnTqU-ZMpnWiXWaF0VAXoFd8jacZ3m9U-JJ3powRxPmjQkD8rozXn7WEIRcLf4eDbwURXbveqCafsvbySKXsCdNjYmFtFpwwPDcS5YUplDWeOdBvd3OPVY6rgIkIM-Xt2GywAyQLl21QJkEFRNKBeRh401LTZAViAPaDUi65mdrqq7fKSffa0JyhqAdwPPO1Xo9I9sQsvnh6OjgMbkJH0VgGUYsdsnWfLpwTwDdzc3TOowo-XrdcfsXV3FmzA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining+the+application+of+the+IDEAL+framework+in+the+reporting+and+evaluation+of+innovative+invasive+procedures%3A+secondary+qualitative+analysis+of+a+systematic+review&rft.jtitle=BMJ+open&rft.au=Richards%2C+Hollie+Sarah&rft.au=Cousins%2C+Sian&rft.au=Scroggie%2C+Darren+L&rft.au=Elliott%2C+Daisy&rft.date=2024-05-24&rft.pub=British+Medical+Journal+Publishing+Group&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136%2Fbmjopen-2023-079654&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F38803251&rft.externalDBID=bmjopen&rft.externalDocID=bmjopen
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2044-6055&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2044-6055&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2044-6055&client=summon