Impact of pandemic service changes on ethnic inequalities in maternal and perinatal outcomes in England: a population-based study
ObjectiveIn the UK and worldwide, there are substantial ethnic inequalities in maternal and perinatal care and outcomes. We aim to assess the impact of the unprecedented change in care provision during the COVID-19 pandemic on inequalities in adverse maternity outcomes.DesignRetrospective cohort stu...
Saved in:
Published in | BMJ open Vol. 15; no. 1; p. e090359 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
British Medical Journal Publishing Group
09.01.2025
BMJ Publishing Group LTD BMJ Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ObjectiveIn the UK and worldwide, there are substantial ethnic inequalities in maternal and perinatal care and outcomes. We aim to assess the impact of the unprecedented change in care provision during the COVID-19 pandemic on inequalities in adverse maternity outcomes.DesignRetrospective cohort study using structured electronic health record data.SettingEnglish hospital trusts providing maternity care.ParticipantsWomen giving birth and babies born in the National Health Service (NHS) in England between 1 April 2018 and 31 March 2021, in three time groups: prepandemic, the first pandemic wave (26 March 2020 to 30 June 2020) and second pandemic wave (1 July 2020 to 31 March 2021). Self-reported ethnicity was grouped into White, South-Asian, Black, Mixed and Other.Main outcome measuresComposite and component measures of maternal (emergency caesarean section, obstetric anal sphincter injury, hysterectomy, sepsis, anaesthetic complications and prolonged hospital stay) and perinatal (stillbirth, neonatal death, preterm birth, brain injury, small for gestational age and prolonged hospital stay). Poisson regression was used to compare relative risks between different ethnic groups.Findings1.54 million maternal and 1.43 million neonatal records were included. The overall incidence of adverse outcomes per 1000 births initially decreased maternal: from 308.0 (95% CI 307.0 to 309.0) to 291.0 (95% CI 311.4 to 314.9) (p<0.001); perinatal: from 133.0 (95% CI 132.3 to 133.7) to 111.9 (95% CI 110.1 to 113.7) (p<0.001)), but then increased in the second pandemic period (maternal: 313.2 (95% CI 311.4 to 314.9) (p<0.001); perinatal 118.9 (95% CI 117.7 to 120.0) (p<0.001)). The risk of adverse outcomes was higher in women and babies from all ethnic minority groups compared with White women in both pandemic periods. Black and South-Asian women and babies were approximately 25% more likely to sustain adverse outcomes. While similar overall changes in adverse outcomes were seen in all groups, existing inequalities were sustained throughout the pandemic periods.InterpretationExisting inequalities in adverse maternal and perinatal/neonatal outcomes were maintained, not tempered, during the pandemic, despite substantial changes to maternity services and care. Further research on possible interventions to reduce inequality is needed. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Original research ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise. All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare funding as noted above. AJ is supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. JEJ, BI, EL, TD and AK have received salary support from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. TD and AK have been vice-presidents of the RCOG in this time. We declare no other financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years, and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. BI and JEJ contributed equally. |
ISSN: | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090359 |