A realist synthesis of multicentre comparative audit implementation: exploring what works and in which healthcare contexts

• Published in: BMJ open quality Vol. 13; no. 1; p. e002629
• Main Authors: McGlacken-Byrne, Sinéad M, Murphy, Nuala P, Barry, Sarah
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 05.03.2024; BMJ Publishing Group LTD; BMJ Publishing Group
• Subjects: Audit and feedback; Audit committees; Audit cycles; Benchmarking; Clinical outcomes; Delivery of Health Care; Diabetes; Diabetes mellitus; Evidence-based medicine; Fractures; Health Facilities; Hip joint; Humans; Intervention; Leadership; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Original Research; Quality measurement; Standards of care; United Kingdom > UK; Standards of care; Quality measurement; Audit and feedback; Evidence-based medicine; Diabetes mellitus
• ISSN: 2399-6641; 2399-6641
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002629

BackgroundMulticentre comparative clinical audits have the potential to improve patient care, allow benchmarking and inform resource allocation. However, implementing effective and sustainable large-scale audit can be difficult within busy and resource-constrained contemporary healthcare settings. There are little data on what facilitates the successful implementation of multicentre audits. As healthcare environments are complex sociocultural organisational environments, implementing multicentre audits within them is likely to be highly context dependent.ObjectiveWe aimed to examine factors that were influential in the implementation process of multicentre comparative audits within healthcare contexts—what worked, why, how and for whom?MethodsA realist review was conducted in accordance with the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards reporting standards. A preliminary programme theory informed two systematic literature searches of peer-reviewed and grey literature. The main context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations underlying the implementation processes of multicentre audits were identified and formed a final programme theory.Results69 original articles were included in the realist synthesis. Four discrete CMO configurations were deduced from this synthesis, which together made up the final programme theory. These were: (1) generating trustworthy data; (2) encouraging audit participation; (3) ensuring audit sustainability; and (4) facilitating audit cycle completion.ConclusionsThis study elucidated contexts, mechanisms and outcomes influential to the implementation processes of multicentre or national comparative audits in healthcare. The relevance of these contextual factors and generative mechanisms were supported by established theories of behaviour and findings from previous empirical research. These findings highlight the importance of balancing reliability with pragmatism within complex adaptive systems, generating and protecting human capital, ensuring fair and credible leadership and prioritising change facilitation.