Efficacy and safety of pamapimod in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving stable methotrexate therapy

Objective:To determine the efficacy and safety of pamapimod in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate clinical response to methotrexate (MTX).Methods:Patients receiving stable doses of MTX were randomised to one of six dose groups and received 12 weeks of double-b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 69; no. 2; pp. 364 - 367
Main Authors Alten, R E, Zerbini, C, Jeka, S, Irazoque, F, Khatib, F, Emery, P, Bertasso, A, Rabbia, M, Caulfield, J P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism 01.02.2010
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective:To determine the efficacy and safety of pamapimod in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate clinical response to methotrexate (MTX).Methods:Patients receiving stable doses of MTX were randomised to one of six dose groups and received 12 weeks of double-blind pamapimod (up to 300 mg once daily) or matching placebo. The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of patients with ⩾20% improvement in RA based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at 12 weeks. Secondary measures were ACR50, Disease Activity Score (DAS)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) responses and the individual ACR core set of parameters. Safety measures included adverse events (AEs), laboratory testing and immunology assessments.Results:On a background of MTX, the percentage of patients with an ACR20 response at week 12 in the pamapimod groups (31% to 43%) was not significantly different from placebo (34%). Secondary efficacy end points showed a similar pattern. AEs were typically mild and included infections, gastrointestinal disturbances, dizziness and rashes; AEs resulting in discontinuation of study drug were primarily attributed to infections.Conclusion:In patients with active RA receiving stable doses of MTX, pamapimod showed non-significant improvement in efficacy outcomes compared to placebo.
Bibliography:Extended report
ark:/67375/NVC-ST3Z26H0-4
href:annrheumdis-69-364.pdf
ArticleID:ar104802
local:annrheumdis;69/2/364
PMID:19357113
istex:EE98EC09DAA8A31D3076EABD181E3ED28FAE20F6
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/ard.2008.104802