Comparison of methods for measuring and assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in terrestrial carbon pools. How do the accuracy and precision of current methods compare? A systematic review protocol
BACKGROUND: Climate change and high rates of global carbon emissions have focussed attention on the need for high-quality monitoring systems to assess how much carbon is present in terrestrial systems and how these change over time. The choice of system to adopt should be guided by good science. The...
Saved in:
| Published in | Environmental evidence Vol. 1; no. 1; p. 6 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
BioMed Central Ltd
21.06.2012
BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | BACKGROUND: Climate change and high rates of global carbon emissions have focussed attention on the need for high-quality monitoring systems to assess how much carbon is present in terrestrial systems and how these change over time. The choice of system to adopt should be guided by good science. There is a growing body of scientific and technical information on ground-based and remote sensing methods of carbon measurement. The adequacy and comparability of these different systems have not been fully evaluated. METHODS: A systematic review will compare methods of assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in key land use categories, including, forest land, cropland, grassland, and wetlands, in terrestrial carbon pools that can be accounted for under the Kyoto protocol (above- ground biomass, below-ground biomass, dead wood, litter and soil carbon). Assessing carbon in harvested wood products will not be considered in this review. DISCUSSION: Developing effective mitigation strategies to reduce carbon emissions and equitable adaptation strategies to cope with increasing global temperatures will rely on robust scientific information that is free from biases imposed by national and commercial interests. A systematic review of the methods used for assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes will contribute to the transparent analysis of complex and often contradictory science. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Abstract Background Climate change and high rates of global carbon emissions have focussed attention on the need for high-quality monitoring systems to assess how much carbon is present in terrestrial systems and how these change over time. The choice of system to adopt should be guided by good science. There is a growing body of scientific and technical information on ground-based and remote sensing methods of carbon measurement. The adequacy and comparability of these different systems have not been fully evaluated. Methods A systematic review will compare methods of assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in key land use categories, including, forest land, cropland, grassland, and wetlands, in terrestrial carbon pools that can be accounted for under the Kyoto protocol (above- ground biomass, below-ground biomass, dead wood, litter and soil carbon). Assessing carbon in harvested wood products will not be considered in this review. Discussion Developing effective mitigation strategies to reduce carbon emissions and equitable adaptation strategies to cope with increasing global temperatures will rely on robust scientific information that is free from biases imposed by national and commercial interests. A systematic review of the methods used for assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes will contribute to the transparent analysis of complex and often contradictory science. BACKGROUND: Climate change and high rates of global carbon emissions have focussed attention on the need for high-quality monitoring systems to assess how much carbon is present in terrestrial systems and how these change over time. The choice of system to adopt should be guided by good science. There is a growing body of scientific and technical information on ground-based and remote sensing methods of carbon measurement. The adequacy and comparability of these different systems have not been fully evaluated. METHODS: A systematic review will compare methods of assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in key land use categories, including, forest land, cropland, grassland, and wetlands, in terrestrial carbon pools that can be accounted for under the Kyoto protocol (above- ground biomass, below-ground biomass, dead wood, litter and soil carbon). Assessing carbon in harvested wood products will not be considered in this review. DISCUSSION: Developing effective mitigation strategies to reduce carbon emissions and equitable adaptation strategies to cope with increasing global temperatures will rely on robust scientific information that is free from biases imposed by national and commercial interests. A systematic review of the methods used for assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes will contribute to the transparent analysis of complex and often contradictory science. |
| Author | Kanamaru, Hideki Holmgren, Peter Lehtonen, Aleksi Pullin, Andrew S Petrokofsky, Gillian Goetz, Scott J Joosten, Hans Wattenbach, Martin Achard, Frédéric Menton, Mary CS |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Gillian surname: Petrokofsky fullname: Petrokofsky, Gillian – sequence: 2 givenname: Hideki surname: Kanamaru fullname: Kanamaru, Hideki – sequence: 3 givenname: Frédéric surname: Achard fullname: Achard, Frédéric – sequence: 4 givenname: Scott J surname: Goetz fullname: Goetz, Scott J – sequence: 5 givenname: Hans surname: Joosten fullname: Joosten, Hans – sequence: 6 givenname: Peter surname: Holmgren fullname: Holmgren, Peter – sequence: 7 givenname: Aleksi surname: Lehtonen fullname: Lehtonen, Aleksi – sequence: 8 givenname: Mary CS surname: Menton fullname: Menton, Mary CS – sequence: 9 givenname: Andrew S surname: Pullin fullname: Pullin, Andrew S – sequence: 10 givenname: Martin surname: Wattenbach fullname: Wattenbach, Martin |
| BookMark | eNptUsFu1DAQjVCRKKVH7j5ySYntrOOcoFoBrVSJC5ytsTPZdUnixeOl2r_sJ-FsaNUCc7Fn5s2b5xm_Lk6mMGFRvOXVBedavRdV3ZRCalHyUr0oTh_9kyf3V8U50W2VTa-0qKrT4n4dxh1ET2FioWcjpm3oiPUh5jvQPvppw2DqGBAh0ew5iDajKQX3g465pxHmtjBtkJifWMIYkVL0MDxgdiEMdMGuwh3rAktbZODcPoI7HJl2EZ0nv4jJ8YhTehTljlLxA7tkdKCEIyTvWMRfHu9yZcjtw_CmeNnDQHj-5zwrvn_-9G19Vd58_XK9vrwpbS1FKmve9CC0krwBp52tuKg6AW3Hbcc7xx3aWoNumrZuVY2dBe56y1eublrVI8iz4nrh7QLcml30I8SDCeDNMRDixkDM-gY0KFFyK_pmtRK109hmq3UrsZfWai4z18eFy_owYufyoyMMz0ifZ_IkzLxUMy_VcKMyxbuFIs_h5z4P3YyeHA4DTBj2ZISSSmqlVjpD5QJ1MRBF7I3zKY8yzNx-MLwy84_6p0H5V9WDvP_jfwMyFNRi |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_14483_2256201X_15961 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fecs_2022_100016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoderma_2021_115069 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_47871_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_land10020156 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_10_12_123001 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_70313_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_uclim_2022_101267 crossref_primary_10_1111_sjtg_12406 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ancene_2024_100435 crossref_primary_10_1051_bioconf_20249101027 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ac31ee crossref_primary_10_3390_rs10030442 crossref_primary_10_5897_JSSEM2017_0664 crossref_primary_10_3390_su14169808 crossref_primary_10_3390_su151511930 crossref_primary_10_3390_f5071653 crossref_primary_10_1111_ejss_13362 crossref_primary_10_1002_ppp_2067 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10668_020_01178_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoderma_2021_115176 crossref_primary_10_4236_ojf_2016_62013 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsta_2020_0266 crossref_primary_10_3390_land12010255 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jksus_2019_09_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tfp_2025_100789 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12665_017_6903_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rsase_2024_101226 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e17287 crossref_primary_10_17129_botsci_2855 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ab1aca crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_7b00889 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_148169 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoderma_2021_115002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2016_08_032 crossref_primary_10_3390_land11050639 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2018_02_044 crossref_primary_10_1002_ppp3_10609 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_earscirev_2021_103689 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tfp_2020_100050 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0254231 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geodrs_2023_e00633 crossref_primary_10_1080_17530350_2020_1864448 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_14_5633_2017 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_88775_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12237_023_01224_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envint_2015_07_011 crossref_primary_10_3390_land11081305 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_015_0662_5 crossref_primary_10_1039_D1EA00102G crossref_primary_10_1515_chem_2022_0301 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoser_2014_07_007 crossref_primary_10_1088_1742_6596_2157_1_012035 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compag_2017_11_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2016_01_025 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_158661 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2018_01_035 crossref_primary_10_3390_jmse11010175 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs8010009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nxsust_2024_100035 crossref_primary_10_3390_land14010179 crossref_primary_10_3390_f8040122 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apgeog_2021_102479 crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2024_1409539 |
| Cites_doi | 101098/rstb20031422 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00339-4 10.1073/pnas.1004875107 10.1016/j.agee.2009.07.006 10.1007/BF00009452 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1865:PTDOSP]2.0.CO;2 101046/j1365-2486200100426x 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001002.x 10.1023/A:1017514802028 10.1093/treephys/25.7.873 10.1029/2003GB00203 101007/s00442-011-2165-z 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.045 10.1098/rsta.2002.1020 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01033.x 10.1093/treephys/24.2.121 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00770.x 101080/01431160500486732 10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00070-4 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.02027.x 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1997.00062.x 10.2307/2388024 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00019-4 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.006 101186/1750-0680-1184-1182 10.1073/pnas.0803375105 10.1007/s11104-004-0331-3 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00778.x 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00887.x 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00028-2 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02016.x 10.5194/bgd-2-737-2005 10.2307/2388975 10.1139/X07-194 101098/rstb20031425 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.006 10.4155/cmt.11.18 101007/s00442-005-0100-x 10.1038/nature06591 10.1126/science.1070656 10.2136/sssaj1999.03615995006300020016x 10.5194/bg-5-1311-2008 10.1017/S0266467409006129 10.1007/s11104-007-9470-7 10.1051/forest:2005075 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.07.008 101016/S0169-5347(00)01906-6 101590/S1676-06032008000200001 10.1051/forest:2006097 101046/j1354-1013200200486x 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.02.033 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.10.026 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00855.x 10.1098/rsta.2002.1026 101111/j1365-2486200601272x 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.08.021 10.1016/j.agee.2010.04.004 101016/jenvsci200412010 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01756.x 101038/nature01131 10.1016/S0022-4898(99)00020-8 10.1007/s10342-010-0381-4 10.1007/s003740050430 101111/j1365-2486200400751x 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00017-1 10.1029/94GB00767 10.1007/s10021-008-9152-1 10.1139/x99-215 101126/science1136163 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00617.x 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03647-4 101017/S0266467401001055 10.1007/s004420050201 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.05.016 101111/j1365-2486200701323x 10.1038/ngeo671 10.1016/0167-1987(88)90014-1 101016/jenvpol200706057 10.1016/j.envsci.2007.01.010 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.11.002 101029/2003GB002142 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00002-X 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.01.005 101111/j1365-2486200500955x 10.1017/S0266467403003493 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.024 101073/pnas0804042105 10.1007/BF00010172 101007/s10584-005-8074-6 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7S9 L.6 DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | AGRICOLA |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Environmental Sciences |
| EISSN | 2047-2382 |
| EndPage | 6 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_e3e31b2f75524c8e99994893ef3bb813 oai_biomedcentral_com_2047_2382_1_6 10_1186_2047_2382_1_6 |
| GroupedDBID | 0R~ 2VQ 2XV 4.4 5VS 7XC 8FE 8FH AAFWJ AAHBH AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ACGFS ADBBV ADUKV AEGXH AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHSBF AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH ATCPS BAPOH BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BHPHI BMC C6C CCPQU CITATION EBLON EBS EDH EJD GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HCIFZ IAO IEP IHR IHW IPNFZ ISR KQ8 M~E OK1 PATMY PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PROAC PYCSY RBZ RIG RNS ROL RPM RSV SEV SOJ 7S9 L.6 -A0 ABVAZ ACRMQ ADINQ AFGXO AFNRJ C24 IFM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-417fa286317ac8cb0120d2a9d1bd1dc1ceb48a87794964edba1cfb15c4796fea3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISSN | 2047-2382 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:30:51 EDT 2025 Wed May 22 07:15:01 EDT 2024 Fri Jul 11 12:19:14 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:17:19 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:13:04 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b432t-417fa286317ac8cb0120d2a9d1bd1dc1ceb48a87794964edba1cfb15c4796fea3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/e3e31b2f75524c8e99994893ef3bb813 |
| PQID | 2636386658 |
| PQPubID | 24069 |
| PageCount | 1 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e3e31b2f75524c8e99994893ef3bb813 biomedcentral_primary_oai_biomedcentral_com_2047_2382_1_6 proquest_miscellaneous_2636386658 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_2047_2382_1_6 crossref_primary_10_1186_2047_2382_1_6 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2012-06-21 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-06-21 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2012 text: 2012-06-21 day: 21 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationTitle | Environmental evidence |
| PublicationYear | 2012 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BMC |
| References | 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B56 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B78 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B14 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B47 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B107 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B84 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B95 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B96 - 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B20 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B86 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B65 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B2 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B111 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B3 |
| References_xml | – ident: - doi: 101098/rstb20031422 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00339-4 – ident: 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B107 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004875107 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.07.006 – ident: - doi: 10.1007/BF00009452 – ident: 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B20 doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1865:PTDOSP]2.0.CO;2 – ident: - doi: 101046/j1365-2486200100426x – ident: - doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001002.x – ident: - doi: 10.1023/A:1017514802028 – ident: 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B84 doi: 10.1093/treephys/25.7.873 – ident: - doi: 10.1029/2003GB00203 – ident: - doi: 101007/s00442-011-2165-z – ident: - doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.045 – ident: - doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1020 – ident: - doi: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01033.x – ident: 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B56 doi: 10.1093/treephys/24.2.121 – ident: - doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00770.x – ident: - doi: 101080/01431160500486732 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00070-4 – ident: - doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.02027.x – ident: - doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1997.00062.x – ident: - doi: 10.2307/2388024 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00019-4 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.006 – ident: - doi: 101186/1750-0680-1184-1182 – ident: 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B96 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803375105 – ident: - doi: 10.1007/s11104-004-0331-3 – ident: - doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00778.x – ident: - doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00887.x – ident: - doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00028-2 – ident: - doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02016.x – ident: - doi: 10.5194/bgd-2-737-2005 – ident: - doi: 10.2307/2388975 – ident: - doi: 10.1139/X07-194 – ident: - doi: 101098/rstb20031425 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.006 – ident: - doi: 10.4155/cmt.11.18 – ident: 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B47 doi: 101007/s00442-005-0100-x – ident: 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B78 doi: 10.1038/nature06591 – ident: 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B2 doi: 10.1126/science.1070656 – ident: - doi: 10.2136/sssaj1999.03615995006300020016x – ident: - doi: 10.5194/bg-5-1311-2008 – ident: - doi: 10.1017/S0266467409006129 – ident: - doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9470-7 – ident: - doi: 10.1051/forest:2005075 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.07.008 – ident: 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B65 doi: 101016/S0169-5347(00)01906-6 – ident: - doi: 101590/S1676-06032008000200001 – ident: - doi: 10.1051/forest:2006097 – ident: - doi: 101046/j1354-1013200200486x – ident: - doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.02.033 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.10.026 – ident: - doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00855.x – ident: - doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1026 – ident: - doi: 101111/j1365-2486200601272x – ident: - doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.08.021 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.04.004 – ident: 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B111 doi: 101016/jenvsci200412010 – ident: - doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01756.x – ident: 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B95 doi: 101038/nature01131 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/S0022-4898(99)00020-8 – ident: - doi: 10.1007/s10342-010-0381-4 – ident: - doi: 10.1007/s003740050430 – ident: - doi: 101111/j1365-2486200400751x – ident: - doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00017-1 – ident: - doi: 10.1029/94GB00767 – ident: - doi: 10.1007/s10021-008-9152-1 – ident: - doi: 10.1139/x99-215 – ident: 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B3 doi: 101126/science1136163 – ident: - doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00617.x – ident: - doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03647-4 – ident: - doi: 101017/S0266467401001055 – ident: - doi: 10.1007/s004420050201 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.05.016 – ident: - doi: 101111/j1365-2486200701323x – ident: - doi: 10.1038/ngeo671 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/0167-1987(88)90014-1 – ident: 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B86 doi: 101016/jenvpol200706057 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2007.01.010 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.11.002 – ident: - doi: 101029/2003GB002142 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00002-X – ident: - doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.01.005 – ident: - doi: 101111/j1365-2486200500955x – ident: - doi: 10.1017/S0266467403003493 – ident: - doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.024 – ident: 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6-B14 doi: 101073/pnas0804042105 – ident: - doi: 10.1007/BF00010172 – ident: - doi: 101007/s10584-005-8074-6 |
| SSID | ssj0000858200 |
| Score | 2.2026215 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | BACKGROUND: Climate change and high rates of global carbon emissions have focussed attention on the need for high-quality monitoring systems to assess how much... Abstract Background Climate change and high rates of global carbon emissions have focussed attention on the need for high-quality monitoring systems to assess... |
| SourceID | doaj biomedcentral proquest crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database |
| StartPage | 6 |
| SubjectTerms | belowground biomass carbon carbon sinks climate change cropland dead wood forest land grasslands land use protocols soil carbon systematic review treaties wood |
| Title | Comparison of methods for measuring and assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in terrestrial carbon pools. How do the accuracy and precision of current methods compare? A systematic review protocol |
| URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2636386658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2382-1-6 https://doaj.org/article/e3e31b2f75524c8e99994893ef3bb813 |
| Volume | 1 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwELVQuXBBFKhYPiojIU6EbhzHa5_QUrVarQQXqNSbNR47ElAl1WZXiH_Zn8RMPra7RYgLt4092jjx2PPseN4T4g1CAsYFWSiNyzSUVQauAAJyZQVTG0uccqLwp89mcaGXl-XljtQXnwnr6YH7F3eSeJcuqGpWlkqjTQRoHBOmpKoIwXZ6tYpi3s5i6nt_-opCG2-wqI6KoLBqJNi05mRbRusncyfT_WovQHU8_n9M013sOX8kHg6gUc77xh6Ke6l-LI7ObnPUqHIYpO0TcXO61RaUTSV7jehWEjql37wjSNFKQh0ldB98-QphFciagCD-aLu63RLZZwe38lstqRtYzYPddrRhla72vVw0P2VsJAFKCYibFeCv7p-uV4OMDzcGezqobaOGI_Af5FzeckrLPp9GModEQ476VFycn309XWSDcEMWdKHWmc5nFShrCJsAWgycoBsVuJiHmEfMMQVtwc5oLnBGpxggxyrkJeqZM1WC4kgc1E2dnglporNIk0Q1DUoDOgsBnYoUdjWytuhEuL3e89c9SYdn2uz9Gnoizz3vued97s1EvBt72uPAiM7CHFe-WxlZc9f87dZ8vMtfDD-y2-w1pSsgv_aDX_t_-fVEvB6dztOI5884UKdm03plCpo0DUHH5__jRi_EAwKBio-_qfylOFivNukVAa11OBb35_Pll-VxN7Z-AyiOLCI |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+methods+for+measuring+and+assessing+carbon+stocks+and+carbon+stock+changes+in+terrestrial+carbon+pools.+How+do+the+accuracy+and+precision+of+current+methods+compare%3F+A+systematic+review+protocol&rft.jtitle=Environmental+evidence&rft.au=Petrokofsky+Gillian&rft.au=Kanamaru+Hideki&rft.au=Achard+Fr%C3%A9d%C3%A9ric&rft.au=Goetz+Scott+J&rft.date=2012-06-21&rft.pub=BMC&rft.issn=2047-2382&rft.eissn=2047-2382&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F2047-2382-1-6&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_e3e31b2f75524c8e99994893ef3bb813 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2047-2382&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2047-2382&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2047-2382&client=summon |