Acoustic Identification of Bats in the Eastern United States: A Comparison of Parametric and Nonparametric Methods
Ultrasonic detectors are widely used to survey bats in ecological studies. To evaluate efficacy of acoustic identification, we compiled a library of search phase calls from across the eastern United States using the Anabat system. The call library included 1,846 call sequences of 12 species recorded...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of wildlife management Vol. 75; no. 3; pp. 660 - 667 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken, USA
The Wildlife Society
01.04.2011
John Wiley & Sons, Inc Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Ultrasonic detectors are widely used to survey bats in ecological studies. To evaluate efficacy of acoustic identification, we compiled a library of search phase calls from across the eastern United States using the Anabat system. The call library included 1,846 call sequences of 12 species recorded from 14 states. We determined accuracy rates using 3 parametric and 4 nonparametric classification functions for acoustic identification. The 2 most flexible classification functions also were the most accurate: neural networks (overall classification accuracy = 0.94) and mixture discriminant analysis incorporating an adaptive regression model (overall classification accuracy = 0.93). Flexible nonparametric methods offer substantial benefits when discriminating among closely related species and may preclude the need to group species with similar calls. We demonstrate that quantitative methods provide an effective technique to acoustically identify bats in the eastern United States with known accuracy rates. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Ultrasonic detectors are widely used to survey bats in ecological studies. To evaluate efficacy of acoustic identification, we compiled a library of search phase calls from across the eastern United States using the Anabat system. The call library included 1,846 call sequences of 12 species recorded from 14 states. We determined accuracy rates using 3 parametric and 4 nonparametric classification functions for acoustic identification. The 2 most flexible classification functions also were the most accurate: neural networks (overall classification accuracy = 0.94) and mixture discriminant analysis incorporating an adaptive regression model (overall classification accuracy = 0.93). Flexible nonparametric methods offer substantial benefits when discriminating among closely related species and may preclude the need to group species with similar calls. We demonstrate that quantitative methods provide an effective technique to acoustically identify bats in the eastern United States with known accuracy rates. Abstract Ultrasonic detectors are widely used to survey bats in ecological studies. To evaluate efficacy of acoustic identification, we compiled a library of search phase calls from across the eastern United States using the Anabat system. The call library included 1,846 call sequences of 12 species recorded from 14 states. We determined accuracy rates using 3 parametric and 4 nonparametric classification functions for acoustic identification. The 2 most flexible classification functions also were the most accurate: neural networks (overall classification accuracy = 0.94) and mixture discriminant analysis incorporating an adaptive regression model (overall classification accuracy = 0.93). Flexible nonparametric methods offer substantial benefits when discriminating among closely related species and may preclude the need to group species with similar calls. We demonstrate that quantitative methods provide an effective technique to acoustically identify bats in the eastern United States with known accuracy rates. © 2011 The Wildlife Society. Ultrasonic detectors have improved conservation efforts by providing increased knowledge of bat ecology. Numerous researchers have used detectors to conduct species surveys and assess habitat use, and the method is especially valuable for species that are difficult to capture (Ahlen 1999, Murray et al. 1999, OTarrell and Gannon 1999, Duffy et al. 2000, Russo and Jones 2003). Calls can be identified qualitatively based on the researcher's experience and judgment (O'Farrell et al. 1999) or quantitatively by comparing measured attributes of previously recorded species to those of newly recorded calls (Krusic and Neefus 1996, Parsons and Jones 2000, Russo and Jones 2002, Britzke 2003, Preatoni et al. 2005). Ultrasonic detectors are widely used to survey bats in ecological studies. To evaluate efficacy of acoustic identification, we compiled a library of search phase calls from across the eastern United States using the Anabat system. The call library included 1,846 call sequences of 12 species recorded from 14 states. We determined accuracy rates using 3 parametric and 4 nonparametric classification functions for acoustic identification. The 2 most flexible classification functions also were the most accurate: neural networks (overall classification accuracy = 0.94) and mixture discriminant analysis incorporating an adaptive regression model (overall classification accuracy = 0.93). Flexible nonparametric methods offer substantial benefits when discriminating among closely related species and may preclude the need to group species with similar calls. We demonstrate that quantitative methods provide an effective technique to acoustically identify bats in the eastern United States with known accuracy rates. © 2011 The Wildlife Society. |
Author | Swihart, Robert K. Duchamp, Joseph E. Murray, Kevin L. Britzke, Eric R. Robbins, Lynn W. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Eric R surname: Britzke fullname: Britzke, Eric R email: eric.r.britzke@usace.army.mil organization: E-mail – sequence: 2 givenname: Joseph E surname: Duchamp fullname: Duchamp, Joseph E organization: Department of Biology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA 15705, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Kevin L surname: Murray fullname: Murray, Kevin L organization: Present Address: Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc., Bloomington, IN 47403, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Robert K surname: Swihart fullname: Swihart, Robert K organization: Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, Lafayette, IN 47907, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: Lynn W surname: Robbins fullname: Robbins, Lynn W organization: Department of Biology, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO 65804, USA |
BookMark | eNp10u9rEzEYB_AgE-ym-BcIQRBfyM38uEtyvqtlqytdFeqY70Iul7jUXlKTlG3_vaknGwh7FcjzycM3T3IMjnzwBoDXGJ1ihMjHze3w85SJZ2CCW8orIjA_ApNSIVVT4x8vwHFKG4QoxoJNQJzqsE_ZaXjRG5-ddVplFzwMFn5WOUHnYb4x8EylbKKHV95l08N1VtmkT3AKZ2HYqejSeOSbimowOZZ-yvdwFfzucefS5JvQp5fguVXbZF79W0_A1fnZ99mXavl1fjGbLquuxkhUWKie2Y4ZomkvKCemqzUnLUa67tqGW4sbjS0TxHaatnWBtiedxYL0illLT8D7se8uht97k7IcXNJmu1XelDtL0VLCCUesyLf_yU3YR1_CyZY0DDcU1Y_tdAwpRWPlLrpBxXuJkTxMXh4mL5ko8sMob93W3D_F5OL6cv5Xvxn1JuUQH3SNayyQOISrxrorL3D3UFfxl2Sc8kZer-YSL1cLseBruS7-3eg7F8rPeDLlH8O7rLc |
CODEN | JWMAA9 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s11676_019_00923_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2015_09_048 crossref_primary_10_3398_064_084_0105 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_2772 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_1201 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_4711 crossref_primary_10_1002_jwmg_22244 crossref_primary_10_1093_jmammal_gyw076 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoinf_2023_102288 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14280 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eswa_2015_07_069 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoinf_2018_05_005 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_12303 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0206857 crossref_primary_10_3161_15081109ACC2019_21_2_019 crossref_primary_10_3996_092018_JFWM_087 crossref_primary_10_1111_2041_210X_13198 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2014_10_004 crossref_primary_10_1080_09524622_2020_1835539 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_152410 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0300664 crossref_primary_10_1093_jmammal_gyw125 crossref_primary_10_3398_064_075_0210 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoinf_2021_101526 crossref_primary_10_3996_102018_JFWM_090 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2011_12_016 crossref_primary_10_1111_2041_210X_12556 crossref_primary_10_5635_ASED_2015_31_3_160 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_4864 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13364_013_0131_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoinf_2015_02_002 crossref_primary_10_1002_wsb_1053 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eswa_2014_02_021 crossref_primary_10_3390_d11030047 crossref_primary_10_3996_042011_JFWM_027 crossref_primary_10_3996_012017_JFWM_007 crossref_primary_10_1093_jmammal_gyaa089 crossref_primary_10_1080_09524622_2019_1621776 crossref_primary_10_1111_pala_12512 crossref_primary_10_1656_045_021_0309 crossref_primary_10_1002_wsb_715 crossref_primary_10_3996_122012_JFWM_106 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_134230 crossref_primary_10_3161_150811014X683417 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_019_01785_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2017_07_034 crossref_primary_10_1002_jwmg_21251 crossref_primary_10_1002_wsb_1138 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_10916 crossref_primary_10_1093_jmammal_gyz170 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10071_014_0811_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoinf_2018_11_004 crossref_primary_10_1177_194008291100400303 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2020_118839 crossref_primary_10_3996_082013_JFWM_057 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00098-6 10.1017/S0952836901000413 10.2307/1383229 10.3161/001.006.0212 10.1080/01621459.1994.10476866 10.1242/jeb.203.17.2641 10.2307/1380701 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 10.2307/3802553 10.1007/BF00177798 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80041-7 10.1017/S0952836902001231 10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[408:EPODFB]2.0.CO;2 10.1080/09524622.1997.9753331 10.2307/1381534 10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082<0728:VISPCO>2.0.CO;2 10.1139/z97-772 10.3161/001.006.0107 10.2307/1383204 10.1515/mamm-1992-0202 10.1644/BWG-102 10.1007/BF00170257 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03422.x 10.1139/z99-008 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)69[1601:IBFTRO]2.0.CO;2 10.2307/1383203 10.2307/1381562 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2011 The Wildlife Society. Copyright© 2011 The Wildlife Society Copyright © The Wildlife Society, 2011 Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services 2011 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2011 The Wildlife Society. – notice: Copyright© 2011 The Wildlife Society – notice: Copyright © The Wildlife Society, 2011 – notice: Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services 2011 |
DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7QG 7QL 7SN 7ST 7T7 7U6 7U9 7X2 7XB 88A 88I 8FD 8FE 8FH 8FK 8G5 ABUWG AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI BKSAR C1K CCPQU DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ GUQSH H94 HCIFZ LK8 M0K M2O M2P M7N M7P MBDVC P64 PADUT PATMY PCBAR PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PYCSY Q9U R05 |
DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.68 |
DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Ecology Abstracts Environment Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Sustainability Science Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Biology Database (Alumni Edition) Science Database (Alumni Edition) Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central ProQuest Natural Science Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database ProQuest Central Student Research Library Prep AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) Biological Sciences Agriculture Science Database ProQuest research library ProQuest Science Journals Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biological Science Database Research Library (Corporate) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Research Library China Environmental Science Database ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Basic University of Michigan |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Agricultural Science Database University of Michigan Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student Technology Research Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Biology Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection Natural Science Collection Sustainability Science Abstracts ProQuest Central Korea Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection Biological Science Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Research Library Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Research Library China Virology and AIDS Abstracts ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database Agricultural Science Collection Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection Ecology Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Animal Behavior Abstracts Environmental Science Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Environment Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni) |
DatabaseTitleList | Ecology Abstracts CrossRef Agricultural Science Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture |
EISSN | 1937-2817 |
EndPage | 667 |
ExternalDocumentID | 2599304541 10_1002_jwmg_68 JWMG68 41418086 ark_67375_WNG_1LNJ8J7S_S 10.1002/jwmg.68 |
Genre | article Feature |
GeographicLocations | Eastern states |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Eastern states |
GroupedDBID | 02 05W 08R 0R 10A 123 1OC 29L 2AX 31 3SF 3V. 41 52S 52U 5GY 7X2 7XC 8-1 88A 88I 8CJ 8FE 8FH 8FW 8G5 A.K A00 AACFU AAESR AAEVG AAONW AAPSS AAZKR ABBHK ABCUV ABDQB ABEFU ABHUG ABPLY ABPPZ ABPTK ABTLG ABUWG ACAHQ ACBWZ ACGFS ACGOD ACNCT ACPOU ACPRK ACQAM ACXME ACXQS ADAWD ADBBV ADDAD ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOYD ADOZA ADULT ADXAS ADZLD ADZMN AEDJY AEIMD AENEX AESBF AEUPB AEUQT AFBPY AFGKR AFKRA AFMIJ AFPWT AFRAH AGCDD AGJLS AIDBO AIRJO AIURR AJXKR AKPMI ALAGY ALEEW ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ANHSF ASPBG ATCPS ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZQEC AZVAB B4K BAFTC BBNVY BDRZF BENPR BES BFHJK BHBCM BHPHI BKOMP BKSAR BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BPHCQ BRXPI CAG CBGCD COF CS3 CWIXF D0L D1J DC7 DCZOG DOOOF DRFUL DRSTM DWIUU DWQXO EBS EJD EQZMY F1Z FEDTE G-S GNUQQ GODZA GTFYD GUQSH H.T H.X H13 HCIFZ HGD HTVGU HVGLF HZ IL9 IPNFZ JBS JH JLS JPM JSODD JST KM LATKE LEEKS LITHE LK5 LK8 LOXES LUTES LYRES M0K M0L M2O M2P M7P M7R MEWTI MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM MY NEJ NF NHB O66 O9- P2P P2W P4E PADUT PATMY PCBAR PQ0 PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PROAC PYCSY Q.N Q5J QB0 R05 RBO RIG ROL RXW S- SA0 SUPJJ TAE TN5 TWZ UKR UQL VH1 VJK VQP WBKPD WH7 WHWMO WIH WIK WLO WOHZO WVDHM X XG1 XJT YZZ ZCG ZY4 ZZTAW -JH -~X 0R~ 31~ 33P 41~ AAHBH AAHHS AAHKG AANLZ AASGY AAXRX ABJNI ABTAH ABXSQ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACXBN ADACV ADHSS AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEPYG AEQDE AEUYR AFAZZ AFFIJ AFFPM AFNWH AGUYK AHBTC AHXOZ AI. AIAGR AITYG AIWBW AJBDE AQVQM BSCLL CCPQU ECGQY HF~ HGLYW HZ~ IPSME JAAYA JBMMH JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLXEF LPU MY~ NF~ WXSBR XOL XSW YQT YV5 ZCA ZO4 ~02 ~KM ~S- AFVGU AAYXX CITATION 7QG 7QL 7SN 7ST 7T7 7U6 7U9 7XB 8FD 8FK C1K FR3 H94 M7N MBDVC P64 Q9U |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-b4108-18ad6fb6e2c3d8372eb4c72910c4b957ff15c1f682fbc3946e2fd2bf182da6ff3 |
IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
ISSN | 0022-541X |
IngestDate | Fri Oct 25 22:56:12 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 20:49:42 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 02:40:15 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 00:50:15 EDT 2024 Fri Feb 02 07:04:28 EST 2024 Wed Oct 30 09:50:23 EDT 2024 Thu Nov 04 13:46:49 EDT 2021 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b4108-18ad6fb6e2c3d8372eb4c72910c4b957ff15c1f682fbc3946e2fd2bf182da6ff3 |
Notes | Associate Editor: Amy J. Kuenzi. ark:/67375/WNG-1LNJ8J7S-S istex:BC1280C17DFB0C1CAB7FE6EC4336C2C1E64072CF ArticleID:JWMG68 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
PQID | 925615304 |
PQPubID | 40821 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_893272706 proquest_journals_925615304 crossref_primary_10_1002_jwmg_68 wiley_primary_10_1002_jwmg_68_JWMG68 jstor_primary_41418086 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_1LNJ8J7S_S bioone_primary_10_1002_jwmg_68 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20110400 2011-04 20110401 April 2011 2011-04-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2011-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 4 year: 2011 text: 20110400 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Hoboken, USA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Hoboken, USA – name: Bethesda |
PublicationTitle | The Journal of wildlife management |
PublicationTitleAlternate | The Journal of Wildlife Management |
PublicationYear | 2011 |
Publisher | The Wildlife Society John Wiley & Sons, Inc Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: The Wildlife Society – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
References | Fenton, M. B. 2000. Choosing the 'correct' bat detector. Acta Chiropterologica 2: 209-214. Parsons, S. 2001. Identification of New Zealand bats (Chalinolobus tuberculatus and Mystacina tuberculata) in flight from analysis of echolocation calls by artificial neural networks. Journal of Zoology 253: 447-456. Broders, H. G., C. S. Findlay, and L. Zheng. 2004. Effects of clutter on echolocation call structure of Myotis septentrionalis and M. lucifugus . Journal of Mammalogy 85: 273-281. Parsons, S. 1997. Search-phase echolocation calls of the New Zealand short-tailed bat (Mystacina tuberculata) and long-tailed bat (Chalinolobus tuberculatus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 75: 1487-1494. Fenton, M. B. 1999. Describing the echolocation calls and behaviour of bats. Acta Chiropterologica 1: 127-136. Murray, K. L., E. R. Britzke, and L. W. Robbins. 2001. Variation in search-phase calls of bats. Journal of Mammalogy 82: 728-737. Murray, K. L., E. R. Britzke, B. M. Hadley, and L. W. Robbins. 1999. Surveying bat communities: a comparison between mist nets and the Anabat II bat detector system. Acta Chiropterologica 1: 105-112. Mukhida, M., J. Orprecio, and M. B. Fenton. 2004. Echolocation calls of Myotis lucifugus and M. leibii (Vespertilionidae) flying inside a room and outside. Acta Chiropterologica 6: 91-97. Parsons, S., and G. Jones. 2000. Acoustic identification of twelve species of echolocating bats by discriminant function analysis and artificial neural networks. Journal of Experimental Biology 203: 2641-2656. O'Farrell, M. J. 1999. Blind test for ability to discriminate vocal signatures of the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) and the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis). Bat Research News 40: 44-48. O'Farrell, M. J., C. Corben, and W. L. Gannon. 2000. Geographic variation in the echolocation calls of the hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus). Acta Chiropterologica 2: 185-197. Masters, W. M., K. A. S. Raver, and K. A. Kazial. 1995. Sonar signals of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, contain information about individual identity, age and family affiliation. Animal Behaviour 50: 1243-1260. O'Farrell, M. J., B. W. Miller, and W. L. Gannon. 1999. Qualitative identification of free-flying bats using the Anabat detector. Journal of Mammalogy 80: 11-23. Venables, W. N., and B. D. Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. Fourth edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA. Ahlen, I. 1999. Use of ultrasound detectors for bat studies in Europe: experiences from field identification, surveys, and monitoring. Acta Chiropterlogica 1: 137-150. Jones, G., T. Gordon, and J. Nightingale. 1992. Sex and age differences in the echolocation calls of lesser horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus hipposideros . Mammalia 56: 189-193. O'Farrell, M. J., and W. L. Gannon. 1999. A comparison of acoustic versus capture techniques for the inventory of bats. Journal of Mammalogy 80: 24-30. Preatoni, D. G., M. Nodari, R. Chirichella, G. Tosi, L. A. Wauters, and A. Martinonli. 2005. Identifying bats from time-expanded recordings of search calls: comparing classification methods. Journal of Wildlife Management 69: 1601-1614. Russo, D., and G. Jones. 2003. Use of foraging habitats by bats in a Mediterranean area determined by acoustic surveys: conservation implications. Ecography 26: 197-209. Hastie, T. J., R. J. Tibshirani, and A. Buja. 1994. Flexible discriminant analysis by optimal scoring. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89: 1255-1270. Smith, M. 1996. Neural networks for statistical modeling. International Thomson Computer Press, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Vaughn, N., G. Jones, and S. Harris. 1997. Identification of British bats species by multivariate analysis of echolocation call parameters. Bioacoustics 7: 189-207. Biscardi, S., J. Orprecio, M. B. Fenton, A. Tsoar, and J. M. Ratcliffe. 2004. Data, sample sizes and statistics affect the recognition of species of bats by their echolocation calls. Acta Chiropterologica 6: 347-363. Fletcher, R. 1987. Practical methods of optimization. Wiley-Interscience, New York, New York, USA. Duchamp, J. E., M. Yates, R. M. Muzika, and R. K. Swihart. 2006. Estimating probabilities of detection for bat echolocation calls: an application of the double-observer method. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34: 408-412. Brigham, R. M., J. E. Creek, and M. B. C. Hickey. 1989. Intraspecific variation in the echolocation calls of two species of insectivorous bats. Journal of Mammalogy 70: 426-428. Obrist, M. K. 1995. Flexible bat echolocation: the influence of individual, habitat, and conspecifics on sonar design. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36: 207-219. Thomas, D. W., G. P. Bell, and M. B. Fenton. 1987. Variation in the echolocation call frequencies recorded from North American vespertilionid bats: a cautionary note. Journal of Mammalogy 68: 842-847. Betts, B. J. 1998. Effect of interindividual variation in echolocation calls on identification of big brown and silver-haired bats. Journal of Wildlife Management 62: 1003-1010. Barclay, R. M. R. 1999. Bats are not birds: a cautionary note on using echolocation calls to identify bats. Journal of Mammalogy 80: 290-296. Britzke, E. R., and K. L. Murray. 2000. A quantitative method for selection of identifiable search-phase calls using the Anabat system. Bat Research News 41: 33-36. Buttrey, S. E., and C. Karo. 2002. Using k-nearest-neighbor classification in the leaves of a tree. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 40: 27-37. Fenton, M. B., and G. P. Bell. 1981. Recognition of species of insectivorous bats by their echolocation calls. Journal of Mammalogy 62: 233-243. Barclay, R. M. R., J. H. Fullard, and D. S. Jacobs. 1999. Variation in the echolocation calls of the hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus): influence of body size, habitat structure, and geographic variation. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77: 530-534. Russo, D., and G. Jones. 2002. Identification of twenty-two bat species (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Italy by analysis of time-expanded recordings of echolocation calls. Journal of Zoology 258: 91-103. Duffy, A., L. F. Lumsden, C. Caddle, R. Chick, and G. Newell. 2000. The efficacy of Anabat ultrasonic detectors and harp traps for surveying microchiropterans in south-eastern Australia. Acta Chiropterologica 2: 127-144. Hastie, T. J., and R. J. Tibshirani. 1996. Discriminant analysis by Gaussian mixtures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 58: 158-176. Kalko, E. K. V., and H. U. Schnitzler. 1993. Plasticity in echolocation signals of European pipistrelle bats in search flight: implications for habitat use and prey detection. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 33: 415-428. 2004; 85 1995; 50 2006; 34 1995; 36 2000; 41 1994; 89 2004; 6 1996 2002; 258 2000; 2 2003 1999; 40 1999; 1 2002 1996; 58 1998; 62 1999; 80 1981; 62 1992; 56 1997; 7 2005; 69 1987; 68 2001; 253 2001; 82 1997; 75 2000; 203 2002; 40 1993; 33 1989; 70 1987 1999; 77 2003; 26 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 Smith M. (e_1_2_7_40_1) 1996 O'Farrell M. J. (e_1_2_7_29_1) 1999; 40 Fenton M. B. (e_1_2_7_15_1) 1999; 1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 Duffy A. (e_1_2_7_14_1) 2000; 2 Krusic R. A. (e_1_2_7_23_1) 1996 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_41_1 Britzke E. R. (e_1_2_7_10_1) 2002 e_1_2_7_42_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_43_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 Lance R. F. (e_1_2_7_24_1) 1996 O'Farrell M. J. (e_1_2_7_33_1) 2000; 2 e_1_2_7_26_1 Murray K. L. (e_1_2_7_27_1) 1999; 1 e_1_2_7_28_1 Britzke E. R. (e_1_2_7_9_1) 2000; 41 Ahlen I. (e_1_2_7_2_1) 1999; 1 e_1_2_7_30_1 Fenton M. B. (e_1_2_7_16_1) 2000; 2 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_31_1 Fletcher R. (e_1_2_7_18_1) 1987 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_34_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_35_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 Obrist M. K. (e_1_2_7_32_1) 1995; 36 e_1_2_7_37_1 e_1_2_7_38_1 Parsons S. (e_1_2_7_36_1) 2000; 203 e_1_2_7_39_1 Hastie T. J. (e_1_2_7_19_1) 1996; 58 |
References_xml | – volume: 77 start-page: 530 year: 1999 end-page: 534 article-title: Variation in the echolocation calls of the hoary bat ( ): influence of body size, habitat structure, and geographic variation publication-title: Canadian Journal of Zoology – volume: 40 start-page: 44 year: 1999 end-page: 48 article-title: Blind test for ability to discriminate vocal signatures of the little brown bat ( ) and the Indiana bat ( ) publication-title: Bat Research News – volume: 56 start-page: 189 year: 1992 end-page: 193 article-title: Sex and age differences in the echolocation calls of lesser horseshoe bat, publication-title: Mammalia – volume: 203 start-page: 2641 year: 2000 end-page: 2656 article-title: Acoustic identification of twelve species of echolocating bats by discriminant function analysis and artificial neural networks publication-title: Journal of Experimental Biology – volume: 7 start-page: 189 year: 1997 end-page: 207 article-title: Identification of British bats species by multivariate analysis of echolocation call parameters publication-title: Bioacoustics – volume: 2 start-page: 127 year: 2000 end-page: 144 article-title: The efficacy of Anabat ultrasonic detectors and harp traps for surveying microchiropterans in south‐eastern Australia publication-title: Acta Chiropterologica – volume: 58 start-page: 158 year: 1996 end-page: 176 article-title: Discriminant analysis by Gaussian mixtures publication-title: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B – volume: 80 start-page: 290 year: 1999 end-page: 296 article-title: Bats are not birds: a cautionary note on using echolocation calls to identify bats publication-title: Journal of Mammalogy – volume: 62 start-page: 1003 year: 1998 end-page: 1010 article-title: Effect of interindividual variation in echolocation calls on identification of big brown and silver‐haired bats publication-title: Journal of Wildlife Management – start-page: 175 year: 1996 end-page: 184 – volume: 80 start-page: 24 year: 1999 end-page: 30 article-title: A comparison of acoustic versus capture techniques for the inventory of bats publication-title: Journal of Mammalogy – year: 1987 – year: 2003 – year: 1996 – volume: 36 start-page: 207 year: 1995 end-page: 219 article-title: Flexible bat echolocation: the influence of individual, habitat, and conspecifics on sonar design publication-title: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology – volume: 2 start-page: 185 year: 2000 end-page: 197 article-title: Geographic variation in the echolocation calls of the hoary bat ( ) publication-title: Acta Chiropterologica – volume: 258 start-page: 91 year: 2002 end-page: 103 article-title: Identification of twenty‐two bat species (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Italy by analysis of time‐expanded recordings of echolocation calls publication-title: Journal of Zoology – start-page: 220 year: 2002 end-page: 224 – volume: 50 start-page: 1243 year: 1995 end-page: 1260 article-title: Sonar signals of big brown bats, , contain information about individual identity, age and family affiliation publication-title: Animal Behaviour – volume: 1 start-page: 105 year: 1999 end-page: 112 article-title: Surveying bat communities: a comparison between mist nets and the Anabat II bat detector system publication-title: Acta Chiropterologica – volume: 253 start-page: 447 year: 2001 end-page: 456 article-title: Identification of New Zealand bats ( and ) in flight from analysis of echolocation calls by artificial neural networks publication-title: Journal of Zoology – volume: 80 start-page: 11 year: 1999 end-page: 23 article-title: Qualitative identification of free‐flying bats using the Anabat detector publication-title: Journal of Mammalogy – volume: 68 start-page: 842 year: 1987 end-page: 847 article-title: Variation in the echolocation call frequencies recorded from North American vespertilionid bats: a cautionary note publication-title: Journal of Mammalogy – volume: 34 start-page: 408 year: 2006 end-page: 412 article-title: Estimating probabilities of detection for bat echolocation calls: an application of the double‐observer method publication-title: Wildlife Society Bulletin – start-page: 185 year: 1996 end-page: 198 – volume: 70 start-page: 426 year: 1989 end-page: 428 article-title: Intraspecific variation in the echolocation calls of two species of insectivorous bats publication-title: Journal of Mammalogy – volume: 1 start-page: 137 year: 1999 end-page: 150 article-title: Use of ultrasound detectors for bat studies in Europe: experiences from field identification, surveys, and monitoring publication-title: Acta Chiropterlogica – volume: 26 start-page: 197 year: 2003 end-page: 209 article-title: Use of foraging habitats by bats in a Mediterranean area determined by acoustic surveys: conservation implications publication-title: Ecography – volume: 40 start-page: 27 year: 2002 end-page: 37 article-title: Using k‐nearest‐neighbor classification in the leaves of a tree publication-title: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis – volume: 62 start-page: 233 year: 1981 end-page: 243 article-title: Recognition of species of insectivorous bats by their echolocation calls publication-title: Journal of Mammalogy – year: 2002 – volume: 2 start-page: 209 year: 2000 end-page: 214 article-title: Choosing the ‘correct’ bat detector publication-title: Acta Chiropterologica – volume: 82 start-page: 728 year: 2001 end-page: 737 article-title: Variation in search‐phase calls of bats publication-title: Journal of Mammalogy – volume: 69 start-page: 1601 year: 2005 end-page: 1614 article-title: Identifying bats from time‐expanded recordings of search calls: comparing classification methods publication-title: Journal of Wildlife Management – volume: 1 start-page: 127 year: 1999 end-page: 136 article-title: Describing the echolocation calls and behaviour of bats publication-title: Acta Chiropterologica – volume: 89 start-page: 1255 year: 1994 end-page: 1270 article-title: Flexible discriminant analysis by optimal scoring publication-title: Journal of the American Statistical Association – volume: 6 start-page: 347 year: 2004 end-page: 363 article-title: Data, sample sizes and statistics affect the recognition of species of bats by their echolocation calls publication-title: Acta Chiropterologica – volume: 6 start-page: 91 year: 2004 end-page: 97 article-title: Echolocation calls of and (Vespertilionidae) flying inside a room and outside publication-title: Acta Chiropterologica – volume: 33 start-page: 415 year: 1993 end-page: 428 article-title: Plasticity in echolocation signals of European pipistrelle bats in search flight: implications for habitat use and prey detection publication-title: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology – volume: 41 start-page: 33 year: 2000 end-page: 36 article-title: A quantitative method for selection of identifiable search‐phase calls using the Anabat system publication-title: Bat Research News – volume: 85 start-page: 273 year: 2004 end-page: 281 article-title: Effects of clutter on echolocation call structure of and publication-title: Journal of Mammalogy – volume: 75 start-page: 1487 year: 1997 end-page: 1494 article-title: Search‐phase echolocation calls of the New Zealand short‐tailed bat ( ) and long‐tailed bat ( ) publication-title: Canadian Journal of Zoology – volume: 1 start-page: 137 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 article-title: Use of ultrasound detectors for bat studies in Europe: experiences from field identification, surveys, and monitoring publication-title: Acta Chiropterlogica contributor: fullname: Ahlen I. – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00098-6 – ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 doi: 10.1017/S0952836901000413 – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.2307/1383229 – volume: 41 start-page: 33 year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 article-title: A quantitative method for selection of identifiable search‐phase calls using the Anabat system publication-title: Bat Research News contributor: fullname: Britzke E. R. – volume: 58 start-page: 158 year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 article-title: Discriminant analysis by Gaussian mixtures publication-title: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B contributor: fullname: Hastie T. J. – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.3161/001.006.0212 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.1080/01621459.1994.10476866 – volume: 203 start-page: 2641 year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_7_36_1 article-title: Acoustic identification of twelve species of echolocating bats by discriminant function analysis and artificial neural networks publication-title: Journal of Experimental Biology doi: 10.1242/jeb.203.17.2641 contributor: fullname: Parsons S. – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.2307/1380701 – ident: e_1_2_7_43_1 doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 – volume-title: Practical methods of optimization year: 1987 ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 contributor: fullname: Fletcher R. – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.2307/3802553 – volume: 40 start-page: 44 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 article-title: Blind test for ability to discriminate vocal signatures of the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) and the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) publication-title: Bat Research News contributor: fullname: O'Farrell M. J. – volume: 36 start-page: 207 year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 article-title: Flexible bat echolocation: the influence of individual, habitat, and conspecifics on sonar design publication-title: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology doi: 10.1007/BF00177798 contributor: fullname: Obrist M. K. – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80041-7 – ident: e_1_2_7_38_1 doi: 10.1017/S0952836902001231 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[408:EPODFB]2.0.CO;2 – volume: 1 start-page: 127 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 article-title: Describing the echolocation calls and behaviour of bats publication-title: Acta Chiropterologica contributor: fullname: Fenton M. B. – volume-title: Neural networks for statistical modeling year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_7_40_1 contributor: fullname: Smith M. – volume: 1 start-page: 105 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 article-title: Surveying bat communities: a comparison between mist nets and the Anabat II bat detector system publication-title: Acta Chiropterologica contributor: fullname: Murray K. L. – ident: e_1_2_7_42_1 doi: 10.1080/09524622.1997.9753331 – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.2307/1381534 – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 doi: 10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082<0728:VISPCO>2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 doi: 10.1139/z97-772 – volume: 2 start-page: 209 year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 article-title: Choosing the ‘correct’ bat detector publication-title: Acta Chiropterologica contributor: fullname: Fenton M. B. – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.3161/001.006.0107 – ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 doi: 10.2307/1383204 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1515/mamm-1992-0202 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1644/BWG-102 – start-page: 175 volume-title: Bats and Forest Symposium year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 contributor: fullname: Lance R. F. – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00170257 – ident: e_1_2_7_39_1 doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03422.x – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1139/z99-008 – start-page: 220 volume-title: The Indiana bat: biology and management of an endangered species year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 contributor: fullname: Britzke E. R. – ident: e_1_2_7_37_1 doi: 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)69[1601:IBFTRO]2.0.CO;2 – start-page: 185 volume-title: Bats and Forest Symposium year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 contributor: fullname: Krusic R. A. – ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 doi: 10.2307/1383203 – ident: e_1_2_7_41_1 doi: 10.2307/1381562 – volume: 2 start-page: 127 year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 article-title: The efficacy of Anabat ultrasonic detectors and harp traps for surveying microchiropterans in south‐eastern Australia publication-title: Acta Chiropterologica contributor: fullname: Duffy A. – volume: 2 start-page: 185 year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 article-title: Geographic variation in the echolocation calls of the hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus) publication-title: Acta Chiropterologica contributor: fullname: O'Farrell M. J. |
SSID | ssj0031186 |
Score | 2.2800896 |
Snippet | Ultrasonic detectors are widely used to survey bats in ecological studies. To evaluate efficacy of acoustic identification, we compiled a library of search... Abstract Ultrasonic detectors are widely used to survey bats in ecological studies. To evaluate efficacy of acoustic identification, we compiled a library of... Ultrasonic detectors have improved conservation efforts by providing increased knowledge of bat ecology. Numerous researchers have used detectors to conduct... |
SourceID | proquest crossref wiley jstor istex bioone |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | 660 |
SubjectTerms | Acoustic echoes acoustic identification Acoustics Anabat Animal communication Bats Biological taxonomies Classification Comparative studies Discriminant analysis discriminant function analysis echolocation Habitat conservation Habitat utilization Libraries Mammals Neural networks quantitative identification Regression analysis Species ultrasonic detectors Ultrasonics Vocalization behavior Wildlife conservation Wildlife management |
Title | Acoustic Identification of Bats in the Eastern United States: A Comparison of Parametric and Nonparametric Methods |
URI | http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1002/jwmg.68 https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-1LNJ8J7S-S/fulltext.pdf https://www.jstor.org/stable/41418086 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjwmg.68 https://www.proquest.com/docview/925615304 https://search.proquest.com/docview/893272706 |
Volume | 75 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwELeg5YE9IL6mlcHkh4m3sCZxXIcX1E3dpopGE2Na3yyfY08DLSltEfz5nD8S2MN4jS-JdWeff2eff0fIoQWwRSkgyfOJShgghiszpRPQ6JGZUDn4ag2Lip9fsfmyWMbcnE1Mq-x8onfUdavdHvlRiWszzs4x-7T6kbiiUe5wNVbQeEyGmQsUBmR4PKsuvnSuOEf0zDu68IKly3Br1rGOHn37dXfzwRGsPoHbtm3MvXVp6FT8u0tRvAc-_4Wwfg06fU6eRfBIp8HaL8gj07wkO9ObdSTQMK_IeqpbX6CLhiu4Nu7J0dbSY7Xd0NuGIuajM-UZEmjAnDRgzo90Sk_6woTulQvlkrcciz9VTU2rtln9fbLw1ac3r8nV6ezryXkS6yokwFLH5ipUzS1wk-m8xgA1M8A0gux0rBmUxcTatNCp5SKzoPOSoaCtM7AYitSKW5vvkkGDKtsjtC7HYIzIShcmarCgLKAkFJpbzXMzIgdBvXIVyDNkoEnOpNO_5GJEaKf2h0Xee3P07Wr93aWjTQp5XZ3J9HM1F_PJpbwckV1vr16QpSwVGLONyH5nQBmn6Eb2Awq70Lfi3HIHJqoxaCuJWC5DfDfGDxx6sz_URTm_Xpxx8ea__9knT8OGtEv7eUsG2_VP8w4RzRYO4rj9Aw8X970 |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,21401,27937,27938,33757,33758,43818,74637 |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fb9MwELagRQIeEL-mlcHww8RbWJM4rsML6qZupbTRxDatb5bPsaeBSEpbBH8-Z8cJ7GG8xpfEurPP39nn7wg5sAA2ywVEaTpSEQPEcHmidAQaPTITKgVfrWFR8Oklmy2zZcjN2YS0ytYnekdd1trtkR_muDbj7Byyj6sfkSsa5Q5XQwWN-6TvmKpEj_SPJsXZl9YVp4ieeUsXnrF42dyadayjh19_fb9-7whWH8BNXVfm1rrUdyr-3aYo3gKf_0JYvwadPCVPAnik48baz8g9Uz0nj8fX60CgYV6Q9VjXvkAXba7g2rAnR2tLj9R2Q28qipiPTpRnSKAN5qQN5vxAx_S4K0zoXjlTLnnLsfhTVZW0qKvV3ycLX31685JcnkwujqdRqKsQAYsdm6tQJbfATaLTEgPUxADTCLLjoWaQZyNr40zHlovEgk5zhoK2TMBiKFIqbm26Q3oVqmyX0DIfgjEiyV2YqMGCsoCSkGluNU_NgOw36pWrhjxDNjTJiXT6l1wMCG3VfrfIO2-Orl2tv7l0tFEmr4pTGc-LmZiNzuX5gOx4e3WCLGaxwJhtQPZaA8owRTeyG1DYha4V55Y7MFGVQVtJxHIJ4rshfuDAm_2uLsrZ1eKUi1f__c9b8nB6sZjL-afi8x551GxOuxSg16S3Xf80bxDdbGE_jOE_-R36tw |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fb9MwELZgRQgeEL-mdYPhh4m30CZxnGQvqBvtRlmjijGtb5bPsaeBSLq2aPz5nB0nsIfxGl8S684-f2efvyPkwACYJM8giONUBgwQw-WRVAEo9MgskzG4ag2zgp9esOkiWXhKobVPq2x9onPUZa3sHvkgx7UZZ-eQDYzPiph_mnxc3gS2gJQ9aPXVNB6SXsp4jHFY72hczL-2bjlGJM1b6vCEhYvmBq1lIB18v_159cGSrT6C67qu9J01qmfV_btNV7wDRP-Fs249mjwnzzyQpKPG8i_IA129JE9HVytPpqFfkdVI1a5YF22u4xq_P0drQ4_kZk2vK4r4j46lY0ugDf6kDf48pCN63BUptK_MpU3ksoz-VFYlLepq-ffJzFWiXr8mF5Pxt-PTwNdYCICFltk1kyU3wHWk4hKD1UgDUwi4w6FikCepMWGiQsOzyICKc4aCpozAYFhSSm5MvE22KlTZDqFlPgStsyi3IaMCA9IASkKiuFE81n2y36hXLBsiDdFQJkfC6l_wrE9oq_b7Rd47c3TtcvXDpqalibgsTkR4VkyzaXouzvtk29mrE2QhCzOM3_pkrzWg8NN1LbrBhV3oWnGe2cMTWWm0lUBcFyHWG-IHDpzZ7-uimF7OTni2-9__vCOPcfiKs8_Flz3ypNmnttlAb8jWZvVLv0Wgs4F9P4T_AKHy_us |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acoustic+Identification+of+Bats+in+the+Eastern+United+States%3A+A+Comparison+of+Parametric+and+Nonparametric+Methods&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+wildlife+management&rft.au=Britzke%2C+Eric+R&rft.au=Duchamp%2C+Joseph+E&rft.au=Murray%2C+Kevin+L&rft.au=Swihart%2C+Robert+K&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=660&rft.epage=667&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fjwmg.68&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-541X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-541X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-541X&client=summon |