Medial retropharyngeal nodal region sparing radiotherapy versus standard radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: open label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial
AbstractObjectivesTo address whether sparing the medial retropharyngeal lymph node (MRLN) region from elective irradiation volume provides non-inferior local relapse-free survival versus standard radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.DesignOpen-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, r...
Saved in:
Published in | BMJ (Online) Vol. 380; p. e072133 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
British Medical Journal Publishing Group
06.02.2023
BMJ Publishing Group LTD |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | AbstractObjectivesTo address whether sparing the medial retropharyngeal lymph node (MRLN) region from elective irradiation volume provides non-inferior local relapse-free survival versus standard radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.DesignOpen-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.SettingThree Chinese hospitals between 20 November 2017 and 3 December 2018.ParticipantsAdults (18-65 years) with newly diagnosed, non-keratinising, non-distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma without MRLN involvement.InterventionsRandomisation was done centrally by the Clinical Trials Centre at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1; block size of four) to receive MRLN sparing radiotherapy or standard radiotherapy (both medial and lateral retropharyngeal lymph node groups), and stratified by institution and treatment modality as follows: radiotherapy alone; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Main outcome measuresNon-inferiority was met if the lower limit of the one sided 97.5% confidence interval of the absolute difference in three year local relapse-free survival (MRLN sparing radiotherapy minus standard radiotherapy) was greater than −8%.Results568 patients were recruited: 285 in the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group; 283 in the standard radiotherapy group. Median follow-up was 42 months (interquartile range 39-45), intention-to-treat analysis showed that the three year local relapse-free survival of the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group was non-inferior to that of the standard radiotherapy group (95.3% v 95.5%, stratified hazard ratio 1.04 (95% confidence interval 0.51 to 2.12), P=0.95) with a difference of −0.2% ((one sided 97.5% confidence interval –3.6 to ∞), Pnon-inferiority<0.001). In the safety set (n=564), the sparing group had a lower incidence of grade ≥1 acute dysphagia (25.5% v 35.1%, P=0.01) and late dysphagia (24.0% v 34.3%, P=0.008). Patient reported outcomes at three years after MRLN sparing radiotherapy were better in multiple domains after adjusting for the baseline values: global health status (mean difference −5.6 (95% confidence interval –9.1 to –2.0), P=0.002), role functioning (−5.5 (–7.4 to –3.6), P<0.001), social functioning (−6.2 (–8.9 to –3.6), P<0.001), fatigue (7.9 (4.0 to 11.8), P<0.001), and swallowing (11.0 (8.4 to 13.6), P<0.001). The difference in swallowing scores reached clinical significance (>10 points difference).ConclusionCompared with standard radiotherapy, MRLN sparing radiotherapy showed non-inferiority in terms of risk of local relapse with fewer radiation related toxicity and improved patient reported outcomes in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03346109 |
---|---|
AbstractList | To address whether sparing the medial retropharyngeal lymph node (MRLN) region from elective irradiation volume provides non-inferior local relapse-free survival versus standard radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.OBJECTIVESTo address whether sparing the medial retropharyngeal lymph node (MRLN) region from elective irradiation volume provides non-inferior local relapse-free survival versus standard radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.DESIGNOpen-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.Three Chinese hospitals between 20 November 2017 and 3 December 2018.SETTINGThree Chinese hospitals between 20 November 2017 and 3 December 2018.Adults (18-65 years) with newly diagnosed, non-keratinising, non-distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma without MRLN involvement.PARTICIPANTSAdults (18-65 years) with newly diagnosed, non-keratinising, non-distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma without MRLN involvement.Randomisation was done centrally by the Clinical Trials Centre at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1; block size of four) to receive MRLN sparing radiotherapy or standard radiotherapy (both medial and lateral retropharyngeal lymph node groups), and stratified by institution and treatment modality as follows: radiotherapy alone; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.INTERVENTIONSRandomisation was done centrally by the Clinical Trials Centre at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1; block size of four) to receive MRLN sparing radiotherapy or standard radiotherapy (both medial and lateral retropharyngeal lymph node groups), and stratified by institution and treatment modality as follows: radiotherapy alone; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Non-inferiority was met if the lower limit of the one sided 97.5% confidence interval of the absolute difference in three year local relapse-free survival (MRLN sparing radiotherapy minus standard radiotherapy) was greater than -8%.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESNon-inferiority was met if the lower limit of the one sided 97.5% confidence interval of the absolute difference in three year local relapse-free survival (MRLN sparing radiotherapy minus standard radiotherapy) was greater than -8%.568 patients were recruited: 285 in the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group; 283 in the standard radiotherapy group. Median follow-up was 42 months (interquartile range 39-45), intention-to-treat analysis showed that the three year local relapse-free survival of the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group was non-inferior to that of the standard radiotherapy group (95.3% v 95.5%, stratified hazard ratio 1.04 (95% confidence interval 0.51 to 2.12), P=0.95) with a difference of -0.2% ((one sided 97.5% confidence interval -3.6 to ∞), Pnon-inferiority<0.001). In the safety set (n=564), the sparing group had a lower incidence of grade ≥1 acute dysphagia (25.5% v 35.1%, P=0.01) and late dysphagia (24.0% v 34.3%, P=0.008). Patient reported outcomes at three years after MRLN sparing radiotherapy were better in multiple domains after adjusting for the baseline values: global health status (mean difference -5.6 (95% confidence interval -9.1 to -2.0), P=0.002), role functioning (-5.5 (-7.4 to -3.6), P<0.001), social functioning (-6.2 (-8.9 to -3.6), P<0.001), fatigue (7.9 (4.0 to 11.8), P<0.001), and swallowing (11.0 (8.4 to 13.6), P<0.001). The difference in swallowing scores reached clinical significance (>10 points difference).RESULTS568 patients were recruited: 285 in the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group; 283 in the standard radiotherapy group. Median follow-up was 42 months (interquartile range 39-45), intention-to-treat analysis showed that the three year local relapse-free survival of the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group was non-inferior to that of the standard radiotherapy group (95.3% v 95.5%, stratified hazard ratio 1.04 (95% confidence interval 0.51 to 2.12), P=0.95) with a difference of -0.2% ((one sided 97.5% confidence interval -3.6 to ∞), Pnon-inferiority<0.001). In the safety set (n=564), the sparing group had a lower incidence of grade ≥1 acute dysphagia (25.5% v 35.1%, P=0.01) and late dysphagia (24.0% v 34.3%, P=0.008). Patient reported outcomes at three years after MRLN sparing radiotherapy were better in multiple domains after adjusting for the baseline values: global health status (mean difference -5.6 (95% confidence interval -9.1 to -2.0), P=0.002), role functioning (-5.5 (-7.4 to -3.6), P<0.001), social functioning (-6.2 (-8.9 to -3.6), P<0.001), fatigue (7.9 (4.0 to 11.8), P<0.001), and swallowing (11.0 (8.4 to 13.6), P<0.001). The difference in swallowing scores reached clinical significance (>10 points difference).Compared with standard radiotherapy, MRLN sparing radiotherapy showed non-inferiority in terms of risk of local relapse with fewer radiation related toxicity and improved patient reported outcomes in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.CONCLUSIONCompared with standard radiotherapy, MRLN sparing radiotherapy showed non-inferiority in terms of risk of local relapse with fewer radiation related toxicity and improved patient reported outcomes in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03346109.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT03346109. ObjectivesTo address whether sparing the medial retropharyngeal lymph node (MRLN) region from elective irradiation volume provides non-inferior local relapse-free survival versus standard radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.DesignOpen-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.SettingThree Chinese hospitals between 20 November 2017 and 3 December 2018.ParticipantsAdults (18-65 years) with newly diagnosed, non-keratinising, non-distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma without MRLN involvement.InterventionsRandomisation was done centrally by the Clinical Trials Centre at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1; block size of four) to receive MRLN sparing radiotherapy or standard radiotherapy (both medial and lateral retropharyngeal lymph node groups), and stratified by institution and treatment modality as follows: radiotherapy alone; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Main outcome measuresNon-inferiority was met if the lower limit of the one sided 97.5% confidence interval of the absolute difference in three year local relapse-free survival (MRLN sparing radiotherapy minus standard radiotherapy) was greater than −8%.Results568 patients were recruited: 285 in the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group; 283 in the standard radiotherapy group. Median follow-up was 42 months (interquartile range 39-45), intention-to-treat analysis showed that the three year local relapse-free survival of the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group was non-inferior to that of the standard radiotherapy group (95.3% v 95.5%, stratified hazard ratio 1.04 (95% confidence interval 0.51 to 2.12), P=0.95) with a difference of −0.2% ((one sided 97.5% confidence interval –3.6 to ∞), Pnon-inferiority<0.001). In the safety set (n=564), the sparing group had a lower incidence of grade ≥1 acute dysphagia (25.5% v 35.1%, P=0.01) and late dysphagia (24.0% v 34.3%, P=0.008). Patient reported outcomes at three years after MRLN sparing radiotherapy were better in multiple domains after adjusting for the baseline values: global health status (mean difference −5.6 (95% confidence interval –9.1 to –2.0), P=0.002), role functioning (−5.5 (–7.4 to –3.6), P<0.001), social functioning (−6.2 (–8.9 to –3.6), P<0.001), fatigue (7.9 (4.0 to 11.8), P<0.001), and swallowing (11.0 (8.4 to 13.6), P<0.001). The difference in swallowing scores reached clinical significance (>10 points difference).ConclusionCompared with standard radiotherapy, MRLN sparing radiotherapy showed non-inferiority in terms of risk of local relapse with fewer radiation related toxicity and improved patient reported outcomes in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03346109 AbstractObjectivesTo address whether sparing the medial retropharyngeal lymph node (MRLN) region from elective irradiation volume provides non-inferior local relapse-free survival versus standard radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.DesignOpen-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.SettingThree Chinese hospitals between 20 November 2017 and 3 December 2018.ParticipantsAdults (18-65 years) with newly diagnosed, non-keratinising, non-distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma without MRLN involvement.InterventionsRandomisation was done centrally by the Clinical Trials Centre at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1; block size of four) to receive MRLN sparing radiotherapy or standard radiotherapy (both medial and lateral retropharyngeal lymph node groups), and stratified by institution and treatment modality as follows: radiotherapy alone; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Main outcome measuresNon-inferiority was met if the lower limit of the one sided 97.5% confidence interval of the absolute difference in three year local relapse-free survival (MRLN sparing radiotherapy minus standard radiotherapy) was greater than −8%.Results568 patients were recruited: 285 in the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group; 283 in the standard radiotherapy group. Median follow-up was 42 months (interquartile range 39-45), intention-to-treat analysis showed that the three year local relapse-free survival of the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group was non-inferior to that of the standard radiotherapy group (95.3% v 95.5%, stratified hazard ratio 1.04 (95% confidence interval 0.51 to 2.12), P=0.95) with a difference of −0.2% ((one sided 97.5% confidence interval –3.6 to ∞), Pnon-inferiority<0.001). In the safety set (n=564), the sparing group had a lower incidence of grade ≥1 acute dysphagia (25.5% v 35.1%, P=0.01) and late dysphagia (24.0% v 34.3%, P=0.008). Patient reported outcomes at three years after MRLN sparing radiotherapy were better in multiple domains after adjusting for the baseline values: global health status (mean difference −5.6 (95% confidence interval –9.1 to –2.0), P=0.002), role functioning (−5.5 (–7.4 to –3.6), P<0.001), social functioning (−6.2 (–8.9 to –3.6), P<0.001), fatigue (7.9 (4.0 to 11.8), P<0.001), and swallowing (11.0 (8.4 to 13.6), P<0.001). The difference in swallowing scores reached clinical significance (>10 points difference).ConclusionCompared with standard radiotherapy, MRLN sparing radiotherapy showed non-inferiority in terms of risk of local relapse with fewer radiation related toxicity and improved patient reported outcomes in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03346109 To address whether sparing the medial retropharyngeal lymph node (MRLN) region from elective irradiation volume provides non-inferior local relapse-free survival versus standard radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Three Chinese hospitals between 20 November 2017 and 3 December 2018. Adults (18-65 years) with newly diagnosed, non-keratinising, non-distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma without MRLN involvement. Randomisation was done centrally by the Clinical Trials Centre at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1; block size of four) to receive MRLN sparing radiotherapy or standard radiotherapy (both medial and lateral retropharyngeal lymph node groups), and stratified by institution and treatment modality as follows: radiotherapy alone; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Non-inferiority was met if the lower limit of the one sided 97.5% confidence interval of the absolute difference in three year local relapse-free survival (MRLN sparing radiotherapy minus standard radiotherapy) was greater than -8%. 568 patients were recruited: 285 in the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group; 283 in the standard radiotherapy group. Median follow-up was 42 months (interquartile range 39-45), intention-to-treat analysis showed that the three year local relapse-free survival of the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group was non-inferior to that of the standard radiotherapy group (95.3% 95.5%, stratified hazard ratio 1.04 (95% confidence interval 0.51 to 2.12), P=0.95) with a difference of -0.2% ((one sided 97.5% confidence interval -3.6 to ∞), P <0.001). In the safety set (n=564), the sparing group had a lower incidence of grade ≥1 acute dysphagia (25.5% 35.1%, P=0.01) and late dysphagia (24.0% 34.3%, P=0.008). Patient reported outcomes at three years after MRLN sparing radiotherapy were better in multiple domains after adjusting for the baseline values: global health status (mean difference -5.6 (95% confidence interval -9.1 to -2.0), P=0.002), role functioning (-5.5 (-7.4 to -3.6), P<0.001), social functioning (-6.2 (-8.9 to -3.6), P<0.001), fatigue (7.9 (4.0 to 11.8), P<0.001), and swallowing (11.0 (8.4 to 13.6), P<0.001). The difference in swallowing scores reached clinical significance (>10 points difference). Compared with standard radiotherapy, MRLN sparing radiotherapy showed non-inferiority in terms of risk of local relapse with fewer radiation related toxicity and improved patient reported outcomes in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03346109. |
Author | Sun, Ying Mao, Yan-Ping Luo, Wei-Jie Liu, Xu Zhou, Guan-Qun Liu, Li-Zhi Li, Wen-Fei Wang, Shun-Xin Li, Yong-Jie Zhang, Ning Liang, Xiao-Yu Guo, Rui Chen, Lei Lin, Li Chen, Yu-Pei Gao, Tian-Sheng Xie, Fang-Yun Liang, Shao-Qiang Huang, Shao-Hui Xu, Cheng Li, Ji-Bin Zhang, Yuan Ma, Jun Lv, Jia-Wei Tang, Ling-Long |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yan-Ping surname: Mao fullname: Mao, Yan-Ping organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 2 givenname: Shun-Xin surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Shun-Xin organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 3 givenname: Tian-Sheng surname: Gao fullname: Gao, Tian-Sheng organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, China – sequence: 4 givenname: Ning surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Ning organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China – sequence: 5 givenname: Xiao-Yu surname: Liang fullname: Liang, Xiao-Yu organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 6 givenname: Fang-Yun surname: Xie fullname: Xie, Fang-Yun organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 7 givenname: Yuan surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Yuan organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 8 givenname: Guan-Qun surname: Zhou fullname: Zhou, Guan-Qun organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 9 givenname: Rui surname: Guo fullname: Guo, Rui organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 10 givenname: Wei-Jie surname: Luo fullname: Luo, Wei-Jie organization: Department of Medical Oncology, Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China – sequence: 11 givenname: Yong-Jie surname: Li fullname: Li, Yong-Jie organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, China – sequence: 12 givenname: Shao-Qiang surname: Liang fullname: Liang, Shao-Qiang organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China – sequence: 13 givenname: Li surname: Lin fullname: Lin, Li organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 14 givenname: Wen-Fei surname: Li fullname: Li, Wen-Fei organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 15 givenname: Xu surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Xu organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 16 givenname: Cheng surname: Xu fullname: Xu, Cheng organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 17 givenname: Yu-Pei surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Yu-Pei organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 18 givenname: Jia-Wei surname: Lv fullname: Lv, Jia-Wei organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 19 givenname: Shao-Hui surname: Huang fullname: Huang, Shao-Hui organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada – sequence: 20 givenname: Li-Zhi surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Li-Zhi organization: Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 21 givenname: Ji-Bin surname: Li fullname: Li, Ji-Bin organization: Clinical Trials Centre, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 22 givenname: Ling-Long surname: Tang fullname: Tang, Ling-Long organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 23 givenname: Lei surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Lei organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 24 givenname: Ying surname: Sun fullname: Sun, Ying organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China – sequence: 25 givenname: Jun orcidid: 0000-0002-1137-9349 surname: Ma fullname: Ma, Jun email: majun2@mail.sysu.edu.cn organization: Center for Precision Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36746459$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1Uk1v1DAQtVARLUvP3JAlLkhsqGMn9oYbqsqHVMQFztYknux6ldjBdkD7__hhddgWlUo9eex5783T-D0nJ847JORlyd6VpZAX7bgvOOO8YIqXQjwhZ6WqZVFuhDi5V5-S8xj3jDEu1KaR9TNyKqSqZFU3Z-TPVzQWBhowBT_tIBzcFvPdefP3dWu9o3GCYN2WBjDWpx0GmA70F4Y4RxoTOAPB_N-0jk6QLLoU6W-bdtRBvC_fQeis8yO8p35CRwdocVjnqa6wrsdgfbDpsKbjPCTbZZmA6zzBGT_aiGZNs1ZEKmgK2f0L8rSHIeL57bkiPz5efb_8XFx_-_Tl8sN10VaMp6Jqe0DD25bzikvTi0ZBidAII7jKZd9Bhx2TCLJnzUZmLGcgFOt7w2oDYkXeHHWn4H_OGJPObjocBnDo56izShZWLP_Girx-AN37ObjsbkHxRinGFtSrW9Tcjmj0FOyYd6Tv_icD6iOgCz7GgL3ubMqL9XkjYAddMr1EQeco6CUK-hiFzLt4wLuTfpzx9shYGv-8Poa-AdYkyM8 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_024_12391_7 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_73239_5 crossref_primary_10_1097_CCO_0000000000001135 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers16020383 crossref_primary_10_1002_ar_25355 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2024_110225 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1392245 crossref_primary_10_1002_cac2_12419 crossref_primary_10_1002_pro6_1219 crossref_primary_10_1360_SSV_2024_0275 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1228994 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00075-9 10.1186/s40880-016-0167-2 10.1016/j.clon.2012.07.015 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.06.020 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.05.013 10.1080/10543406.2010.550701 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6199 10.1002/hed.24296 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044480 10.1002/hed.21627 10.1259/bjr.20140543 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.11.004 10.1007/s00066-018-01421-6 10.1200/JCO.20.03237 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00058-4 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.12.017 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30104-9 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.139 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70303-5 10.2307/2531021 10.1002/cncr.23555 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.10.010 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.049 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.08.007 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2022.20.10.08 10.1007/s00259-008-0918-7 10.1002/cncr.31741 10.1002/hed.21542 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.016 10.5732/cjc.012.10095 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2023 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. BMJ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. – notice: 2023 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. BMJ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | 9YT ACMMV AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7RV 7X7 7XB 88I 8AF 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8G5 ABUWG AFKRA ASE AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI BTHHO CCPQU DWQXO FPQ FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ GUQSH HCIFZ K6X K9. KB0 LK8 M2O M2P M7P MBDVC NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI Q9U 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1136/bmj-2022-072133 |
DatabaseName | BMJ Open Access Journals BMJ Journals:Open Access CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Science Database (Alumni Edition) STEM Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Journals ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland British Nursing Index ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest : Biological Science Collection journals [unlimited simultaneous users] ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection BMJ Journals ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present) Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Research Library SciTech Premium Collection British Nursing Index ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Biological Sciences Research Library Science Database Biological Science Database Research Library (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest AP Science ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition British Nursing Index ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition BMJ Journals ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Research Library Prep MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: ACMMV name: BMJ Journals:Open Access url: https://journals.bmj.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Public Health |
EISSN | 1756-1833 |
ExternalDocumentID | 36746459 10_1136_bmj_2022_072133 bmj |
Genre | Clinical Trial, Phase III Multicenter Study Equivalence Trial Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809 – fundername: Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003453 |
GroupedDBID | 23N 39C 4.4 40O 53G 5GY 7RV 7X7 88I 8AF 8F7 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8G5 9YT AACGO AANCE AAWJN ABIVO ABJNI ABPLY ABTLG ABUWG ABVAJ ACGFS ACGOD ACMFJ ACMMV ACPRK AFKRA AGFXO AHMBA AHNKE AHQMW AJYBZ ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI BPHCQ BTHHO C45 CCPQU CS3 DWQXO EBS EJD F5P FYUFA GNUQQ GUQSH H13 HAJ HCIFZ HMCUK HZ~ JLS JSG L7B LK8 M2O M2P M7P NAPCQ NXWIF O9- OVD PHGZT PQQKQ PROAC R53 RHI RMJ RV8 TEORI UKHRP VVN WOQ YFH YQY AAYXX CITATION PHGZM 0R~ ADIXU CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM RHF 3V. 7XB 8FK ASE FPQ K6X K9. MBDVC PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQUKI Q9U 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-b402t-4bfaed2bb22426df397a1ea93d3277a1fcacec06ea6f0986ed220a370ffd05da3 |
IEDL.DBID | 9YT |
ISSN | 1756-1833 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 21:57:57 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 11:30:12 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:25:14 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:08:49 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:24:23 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:50:38 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Language | English |
License | This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b402t-4bfaed2bb22426df397a1ea93d3277a1fcacec06ea6f0986ed220a370ffd05da3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-1137-9349 |
OpenAccessLink | https://bmj.com/content/380/bmj-2022-072133.full |
PMID | 36746459 |
PQID | 2772977001 |
PQPubID | 2043523 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2774267021 proquest_journals_2772977001 pubmed_primary_36746459 crossref_citationtrail_10_1136_bmj_2022_072133 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_2022_072133 bmj_journals_10_1136_bmj_2022_072133 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-02-06 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-02-06 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2023 text: 2023-02-06 day: 06 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | BMJ (Online) |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | BMJ |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMJ |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | British Medical Journal Publishing Group BMJ Publishing Group LTD |
Publisher_xml | – name: British Medical Journal Publishing Group – name: BMJ Publishing Group LTD |
References | Lv, Cao, Xia (ref11) 2021; 22 Lee, Zhang, Pfister (ref3) 2012; 13 Li, Sun, Chen (ref14) 2012; 31 Langendijk, Doornaert, Rietveld, Verdonck-de Leeuw, Leemans, Slotman (ref31) 2009; 90 Guo, Tang, Mao (ref26) 2019; 125 Cox, Stetz, Pajak (ref20) 1995; 31 Ng, Lee, Chiu, Ku, van Hasselt, Tong (ref6) 2011; 33 Pauloski, Rademaker, Logemann (ref29) 2011; 33 Lin, Lu, Wang (ref8) 2018; 100 Schoenfeld (ref23) 1983; 39 Mazzola, Ricchetti, Fiorentino (ref18) 2014; 87 Popovtzer, Cao, Feng, Eisbruch (ref30) 2009; 93 Li, Li, Huang (ref5) 2019; 195 Grégoire, Ang, Budach (ref15) 2014; 110 Tang, Li, Mao (ref1) 2008; 113 Wang, Yan, Hu (ref4) 2014; 50 Feng, Kim, Lyden (ref27) 2010; 28 Chen, Ismaila, Chua (ref19) 2021; 39 Pong, Urner, Fowler (ref10) 2021; 11 Xiong, Krishnaswamy, Raynor, Loh, Kwa, Lim (ref7) 2016; 38 Tang, Huang, Zhang (ref13) 2022; 23 Chiu, Tseng, Ko, Wang (ref28) 2022; 121 Pan, Liu, Wang (ref9) 2022; 20 Tang, Chen, Guo (ref12) 2018; 19 Fisher, Copas, Tierney, Parmar (ref24) 2011; 64 Loo, Geropantas, Wilson, Martin, Roques (ref17) 2013; 25 Jung, Chow (ref22) 2012; 22 Feng, Kim, Lyden (ref16) 2007; 68 Mao, Tang, Chen (ref21) 2016; 35 Osoba, Rodrigues, Myles, Zee, Pater (ref25) 1998; 16 Ng, Chan, Yen (ref32) 2009; 36 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.15 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.16 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.17 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.18 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.9 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.11 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.8 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.12 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.13 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.14 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.30 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.31 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.10 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.32 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.26 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.27 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.28 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.29 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.22 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.23 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.24 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.25 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.20 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.21 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.5 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.4 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.7 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.6 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.1 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.19 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.3 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.2 |
References_xml | – volume: 31 start-page: 1341 year: 1995 ident: ref20 article-title: Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 22 start-page: 716 year: 2021 ident: ref11 article-title: Induction chemotherapy with lobaplatin and fluorouracil versus cisplatin and fluorouracil followed by chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage III-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial publication-title: Lancet Oncol – volume: 35 start-page: 103 year: 2016 ident: ref21 article-title: Prognostic factors and failure patterns in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy publication-title: Chin J Cancer – volume: 195 start-page: 457 year: 2019 ident: ref5 article-title: Radiotherapy-induced dysphagia and its impact on quality of life in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma publication-title: Strahlenther Onkol – volume: 23 start-page: 479 year: 2022 ident: ref13 article-title: Elective upper-neck versus whole-neck irradiation of the uninvolved neck in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial publication-title: Lancet Oncol – volume: 36 start-page: 12 year: 2009 ident: ref32 article-title: Staging of untreated nasopharyngeal carcinoma with PET/CT: comparison with conventional imaging work-up publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging – volume: 121 start-page: 3 year: 2022 ident: ref28 article-title: Radiation-induced swallowing dysfunction in patients with head and neck cancer: A literature review publication-title: J Formos Med Assoc – volume: 39 start-page: 840 year: 2021 ident: ref19 article-title: Chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy for definitive-intent treatment of stage II-IVA nasopharyngeal carcinoma: CSCO and ASCO guideline publication-title: J Clin Oncol – volume: 22 start-page: 485 year: 2012 ident: ref22 article-title: On sample size calculation for comparing survival curves under general hypothesis testing publication-title: J Biopharm Stat – volume: 38 start-page: E1660 year: 2016 ident: ref7 article-title: Risk of swallowing-related chest infections in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy publication-title: Head Neck – volume: 39 start-page: 499 year: 1983 ident: ref23 article-title: Sample-size formula for the proportional-hazards regression model publication-title: Biometrics – volume: 100 start-page: 891 year: 2018 ident: ref8 article-title: Delineation of neck clinical target volume specific to nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on lymph node distribution and the international consensus guidelines publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 20 start-page: 1001 year: 2022 ident: ref9 article-title: Feasibility analysis of non-prophylactic irradiation of retropharyngeal lymph nodes in medial group of nasopharyngeal carcinoma publication-title: Oncol Prog – volume: 93 start-page: 510 year: 2009 ident: ref30 article-title: Anatomical changes in the pharyngeal constrictors after chemo-irradiation of head and neck cancer and their dose-effect relationships: MRI-based study publication-title: Radiother Oncol – volume: 16 start-page: 139 year: 1998 ident: ref25 article-title: Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores publication-title: J Clin Oncol – volume: 110 start-page: 172 year: 2014 ident: ref15 article-title: Delineation of the neck node levels for head and neck tumors: a 2013 update. DAHANCA, EORTC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, RTOG, TROG consensus guidelines publication-title: Radiother Oncol – volume: 28 start-page: 2732 year: 2010 ident: ref27 article-title: Intensity-modulated chemoradiotherapy aiming to reduce dysphagia in patients with oropharyngeal cancer: clinical and functional results publication-title: J Clin Oncol – volume: 90 start-page: 189 year: 2009 ident: ref31 article-title: A predictive model for swallowing dysfunction after curative radiotherapy in head and neck cancer publication-title: Radiother Oncol – volume: 13 start-page: 172 year: 2012 ident: ref3 article-title: Addition of bevacizumab to standard chemoradiation for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RTOG 0615): a phase 2 multi-institutional trial publication-title: Lancet Oncol – volume: 50 start-page: 1109 year: 2014 ident: ref4 article-title: Study of the medial group retropharyngeal node metastasis from nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on 3100 newly diagnosed cases publication-title: Oral Oncol – volume: 33 start-page: 1335 year: 2011 ident: ref6 article-title: Silent aspiration and swallowing physiology after radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma publication-title: Head Neck – volume: 68 start-page: 1289 year: 2007 ident: ref16 article-title: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of head and neck cancer aiming to reduce dysphagia: early dose-effect relationships for the swallowing structures publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 11 year: 2021 ident: ref10 article-title: Testing for non-inferior mortality: a systematic review of non-inferiority margin sizes and trial characteristics publication-title: BMJ Open – volume: 19 start-page: 461 year: 2018 ident: ref12 article-title: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin versus cisplatin in stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial publication-title: Lancet Oncol – volume: 25 start-page: 162 year: 2013 ident: ref17 article-title: Target volume definition for intensity-modulated radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy and patterns of treatment failure after sequential chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma publication-title: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) – volume: 64 start-page: 949 year: 2011 ident: ref24 article-title: A critical review of methods for the assessment of patient-level interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials, and guidance for practitioners publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol – volume: 33 start-page: 774 year: 2011 ident: ref29 article-title: Relation of mucous membrane alterations to oral intake during the first year after treatment for head and neck cancer publication-title: Head Neck – volume: 113 start-page: 347 year: 2008 ident: ref1 article-title: Retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma detected by magnetic resonance imaging: prognostic value and staging categories publication-title: Cancer – volume: 31 start-page: 579 year: 2012 ident: ref14 article-title: Locoregional extension patterns of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and suggestions for clinical target volume delineation publication-title: Chin J Cancer – volume: 125 start-page: 79 year: 2019 ident: ref26 article-title: Proposed modifications and incorporation of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA improve the TNM staging system for Epstein-Barr virus-related nasopharyngeal carcinoma publication-title: Cancer – volume: 87 year: 2014 ident: ref18 article-title: Dose-volume-related dysphagia after constrictor muscles definition in head and neck cancer intensity-modulated radiation treatment publication-title: Br J Radiol – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.11 doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00075-9 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.21 doi: 10.1186/s40880-016-0167-2 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.17 doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2012.07.015 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.28 doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.06.020 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.30 doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.05.013 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.22 doi: 10.1080/10543406.2010.550701 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.27 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6199 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.7 doi: 10.1002/hed.24296 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.10 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044480 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.6 doi: 10.1002/hed.21627 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.18 doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140543 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.8 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.11.004 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.5 doi: 10.1007/s00066-018-01421-6 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.19 doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03237 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.20 doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.13 doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00058-4 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.31 doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.12.017 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.12 doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30104-9 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.25 doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.139 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.3 doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70303-5 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.23 doi: 10.2307/2531021 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.1 doi: 10.1002/cncr.23555 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.15 doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.10.010 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.16 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.049 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.4 doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.08.007 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.9 doi: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2022.20.10.08 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.32 doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0918-7 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.26 doi: 10.1002/cncr.31741 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.29 doi: 10.1002/hed.21542 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.2 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.24 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.016 – ident: 2023020607450598000_380.feb06_4.e072133.14 doi: 10.5732/cjc.012.10095 |
SSID | ssj0002378965 |
Score | 2.5377705 |
Snippet | AbstractObjectivesTo address whether sparing the medial retropharyngeal lymph node (MRLN) region from elective irradiation volume provides non-inferior local... To address whether sparing the medial retropharyngeal lymph node (MRLN) region from elective irradiation volume provides non-inferior local relapse-free... ObjectivesTo address whether sparing the medial retropharyngeal lymph node (MRLN) region from elective irradiation volume provides non-inferior local... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref bmj |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | e072133 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Biopsy Boundaries Cancer therapies Chemoradiotherapy Chemotherapy Clinical trials Deglutition Disorders Dysphagia Humans Lymph nodes Lymph Nodes - pathology Lymphatic system Metastases Metastasis Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma - radiotherapy Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms - pathology Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms - radiotherapy Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - radiotherapy Patients Planning Public health Quality of life Radiation therapy Regions Survival Survival analysis Swallowing Throat cancer Toxicity |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELZokRASQlBeCwUZqQcOG5rEiZ1wQQhRVUjLiUp7i_yYlK1aZ0l2D_1__WGdcbxbeliOsR3bykzs8czn-Rg7yloFppVlokHkeECpbaJlVSSgbKFkm7bG0m3k2S95elb8nJfz6HAbIqxysyaGhdp1lnzkxzmZgYqipF-XfxNijaLoaqTQ2GMPKXUZQbrUXG19LLlQVS3LmNEnE_LYXF2gXuQEuMwzIsvdw5L7W9IOOzPsNyfP2NNoKPJvo2SfswfgD9ijWQyFH7Ano8ONj_eIXrCbWbgDwntY9d3yj-6v_TlWcd-5UEq4Yz4Q56A_5712i3j16poTMGM98I1T4X7lwvOYenXg5LPlXg__dm-Ji8h3V_oLJyIujkoFl1Mc1SeE8-oXHbHjTXkALgYkKExxBO86VDBwU459DcAFD_QhL9nZyY_f30-TSNGQGDx4rpLCtBpcbkxOW71r0brRGehaOIEC01lrtQWbStAo97qS2DZPtVBp27q0dFq8Yvs4I3jDuDESzReoANfgQlT4iNJTtbaZSa0u7YQdoaya-IsNTTi9CNlQIYm0GUU6YZ83wmxsTHNObBuXu1_4tH1hOWb42N30cKMdd_O4U8wJ-7itxm9IkRftoVuHNvh5FNpTE_Z61KrtWEIqii7Xb__f-Tv2mJjuA2BcHrL9Vb-G92gPrcyHoPS3YZMN-A priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Medial retropharyngeal nodal region sparing radiotherapy versus standard radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: open label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial |
URI | https://bmj.com/content/380/bmj-2022-072133.full https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36746459 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2772977001 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2774267021 |
Volume | 380 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1LT9wwEB6xICEuVd9dSleuxKGHDc3GiZ30RhEIVQqqKqi2p5XtOHQrcFCSPfD_-GGdcZJtqbRST0n8jmcSz9gz8wEczkppdSmSQFkeoYKSmUCJNA6sNLEUZVhqQ97I-YU4v4q_zJP5FoSDL4y-_dV5MlBsJtd-5GlIaUjMiKwkI1SpjmhjegQ7BE1CRlzZj8v1rkrEZZqJpI_hM-Pi38p7sMuFpOM8lClHmPl4PdogZPrF5uwpPOmlRHbckfUZbFn3HHbz_hz8BTzk3uGD1batq7ufqr531yjxMVcVPpWMjFlDAIPumtWqWPZ-VveMrDBWDRt2EB5nLh3r46w2jDZomVPN380bAh5y1a36xAh1iyEH2Zsp9uoCMuqqlxVB4U2Zt1L0Zp92ij24okJussWUYVuNZZx5rJCXcHV2enlyHvR4DIFGLbMNYl0qW0RaR7SuFyWKMmpmVcYLHkm8LY0y1oTCKiRylgosG4WKy7AsizApFH8F2zgi-waY1gJlFZta_OHGPMVHJJzMlJnp0KjEjOEQabPov6dm4VUVLhaUSNRcdNQcw9FAvIXpY5oTtMbN5gof1hXuunAem4seDNzwZxwRKSOSzurH8H6djXNIxyzK2Wrly-D0SBSexvC646J1XwPv7f_f-72FPYK391bi4gC223pl36EQ1OoJjORcTjz3T2Dn-CTPv-P18-nF12-_AStwCVw |
linkProvider | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFD7aOgmQEIJxKwww0pB4aFgSJ06ChBCXTR1bK4Q2aW-Z7TijaHNK0gr1T_Er-GGck0vHHsrbHmM7tuVzbJ-rP4BtL4-MykXoSMN9VFAS7UgRB46JdBCJ3M2Vpmzk0VgMj4MvJ-HJGvzucmEorLI7E-uDOis02ch3fBIDI_KSvp_-dAg1iryrHYRGwxYHZvELVbbq3f5npO8r39_bPfo0dFpUAUehrjRzApVLk_lK-XQ7ZTleyNIzMuEZxzGkl2upjXaFkTjVJBbY1nclj9w8z9wwkxz7XYeNgKMq04ONj7vjr9-WVh2fR3EiwvYNIY-LHXXxAznRpxBP3yN43nUsuXoJrpBs6xtu7y7caUVT9qHhpXuwZuwm3Bi1zvdNuN2Y-FiTuXQf_ozqrBNWmllZTL_LcmHPsIrZIqtLKdKZVYRyaM9YKbNJm-y1YBQKMq9YZ8a4WjmxrH3stWJkJWZWVv92rwn9yBYX8i0j6C-GbGzOBziqdSiyrJwUhMc3YHWoZB17agY4gs0KZGmTDRj2VRnGWQ1Y8gCOr4V8D6GHMzKPgSklUGAyscFTP-AxfiL1okRqT7lahroP20irtN3UVVrrS1ykVEgkTRuS9uFNR8xUtw-rE77H-eofXi9_mDZviqxuutVxx-U8LrdCH14uq3ENydcjrSnmdRtcnggluD48arhqORYXEfmzkyf_7_wF3BwejQ7Tw_3xwVO4hbPidbi62ILerJybZyiNzdTzdgswOL3uXfcXwjlOXQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Nb9MwFLe2IU1ICMH46hhgpCFxaGgSN3aChBBiVBujEwcm9RZsxx6dNqckrVD_Nc78YbznJB07lNuOsR3b8nvPfn4f_hGyH1lhlOVJIA2L4YKS6UDydBgYoYeC29AqjdnI4xN-eDr8PEkmG-R3lwuDYZXdnug36qLUaCMfxKgGCvSSDmwbFvH1YPR-9jNABCn0tHZwGg2LHJvlL7i-1e-ODoDWr-J49Onbx8OgRRgIFNyb5sFQWWmKWKkYT6rCwuEsIyMzVjAYT0ZWS210yI2EaWcph7ZxKJkIrS3CpJAM-t0ktwRLIpQxMREr-07MRJrxpH1NKGJ8oC7PgSdjDPaMIwTq3YSS68fhGh3Xn3Wje-Ruq6TSDw1X3Scbxu2Q7XHrht8hdxpjH21ymB6QP2Off0IrM6_K2Q9ZLd0ZVFFXFr4UY55pjXiH7oxWspi2aV9LikEhi5p2Bo3rlVNH22dfa4r2Yupk_W_3GnGQXHkp31IEAaPA0OaiD6O6AGPMqmmJyHx96oMmfRSq6cMIriiBuU3Rp9BXbSijHrrkITm9EeI9IlswI_OEUKU4qE4mNbD_D1kKn0A9kUkdqVDLRPfIPtAqb8W7zv3NifEcC5GkeUPSHnnTETPX7RPriPRxsf6H16sfZs3rIuub7nXccTWPK6HokZeralhD9PpIZ8qFbwPLI0CX65HHDVetxmJcoGc72_1_5y_INsha_uXo5PgpuQ2TYj5une-RrXm1MM9ALZur557_Kfl-0wL3F1LTUS0 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Medial+retropharyngeal+nodal+region+sparing+radiotherapy+versus+standard+radiotherapy+in+patients+with+nasopharyngeal+carcinoma%3A+open+label%2C+non-inferiority%2C+multicentre%2C+randomised%2C+phase+3+trial&rft.jtitle=BMJ.+British+medical+journal+%28Clinical+research+ed.%29&rft.au=Mao%2C+Yan-Ping&rft.au=Wang%2C+Shun-Xin&rft.au=Gao%2C+Tian-Sheng&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Ning&rft.date=2023-02-06&rft.issn=1756-1833&rft.eissn=1756-1833&rft.volume=380&rft.spage=e072133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136%2Fbmj-2022-072133&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1756-1833&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1756-1833&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1756-1833&client=summon |