Selective interspecific information use in the nest choice of solitary bees

Abstract Most of the studies on learning in bees have focused on the foraging context; we know little about the preferences and cognitive processes in nest-site selection, especially in solitary bees. The majority of the bee species are solitary and in contrast to eusocial bees, solitary bees’ cogni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnimal biology (Leiden, Netherlands) Vol. 70; no. 2; pp. 215 - 225
Main Authors Loukola, Olli J, Gatto, Elia, Híjar-Islas, Ana C, Chittka, Lars
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Leiden|Boston Brill 01.04.2020
Brill Academic Publishers, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Abstract Most of the studies on learning in bees have focused on the foraging context; we know little about the preferences and cognitive processes in nest-site selection, especially in solitary bees. The majority of the bee species are solitary and in contrast to eusocial bees, solitary bees’ cognition and social information use have remained largely unstudied. Solitary cavity-nesting mason bees (Osmia spp.) are an ideal system to study interspecific information use in nest choice in the wild as many species share similar nesting requirements. Here, we show that the blue mason bee (O. caerulescens) and the orange-vented mason bee (O. leaiana) examine hallmarks of parasitization of the nests of red mason bees (O. bicornis) before deciding where to establish their own nests. They were also presented with contextual cues (geometric symbols) that could be linked to parasitization by observational learning. Subjects subsequently had the choice of nesting in a nest site marked by the symbol that matched, or did not match, the one seen at the parasitized or healthy nest. We show that the bees copied and rejected the symbol of the examined nest manipulated to exhibit successful and unsuccessful nesting, respectively. We conclude that solitary bees use interspecific information in their nest-site selection. In contrast with current theories of species coexistence, niche overlap between species may dynamically change depending on the observed success of surrounding individuals.
AbstractList Most of the studies on learning in bees have focused on the foraging context; we know little about the preferences and cognitive processes in nest-site selection, especially in solitary bees. The majority of the bee species are solitary and in contrast to eusocial bees, solitary bees’ cognition and social information use have remained largely unstudied. Solitary cavity-nesting mason bees ( Osmia spp.) are an ideal system to study interspecific information use in nest choice in the wild as many species share similar nesting requirements. Here, we show that the blue mason bee ( O. caerulescens ) and the orange-vented mason bee ( O. leaiana ) examine hallmarks of parasitization of the nests of red mason bees ( O. bicornis ) before deciding where to establish their own nests. They were also presented with contextual cues (geometric symbols) that could be linked to parasitization by observational learning. Subjects subsequently had the choice of nesting in a nest site marked by the symbol that matched, or did not match, the one seen at the parasitized or healthy nest. We show that the bees copied and rejected the symbol of the examined nest manipulated to exhibit successful and unsuccessful nesting, respectively. We conclude that solitary bees use interspecific information in their nest-site selection. In contrast with current theories of species coexistence, niche overlap between species may dynamically change depending on the observed success of surrounding individuals.
Most of the studies on learning in bees have focused on the foraging context; we know little about the preferences and cognitive processes in nest-site selection, especially in solitary bees. The majority of the bee species are solitary and in contrast to eusocial bees, solitary bees' cognition and social information use have remained largely unstudied. Solitary cavity-nesting mason bees (Osmia spp.) are an ideal system to study interspecific information use in nest choice in the wild as many species share similar nesting requirements. Here, we show that the blue mason bee (O. caerulescens) and the orange-vented mason bee (O. leaiana) examine hallmarks of parasitization of the nests of red mason bees (O. bicornis) before deciding where to establish their own nests. They were also presented with contextual cues (geometric symbols) that could be linked to parasitization by observational learning. Subjects subsequently had the choice of nesting in a nest site marked by the symbol that matched, or did not match, the one seen at the parasitized or healthy nest. We show that the bees copied and rejected the symbol of the examined nest manipulated to exhibit successful and unsuccessful nesting, respectively. We conclude that solitary bees use interspecific information in their nest-site selection. In contrast with current theories of species coexistence, niche overlap between species may dynamically change depending on the observed success of surrounding individuals.
Abstract Most of the studies on learning in bees have focused on the foraging context; we know little about the preferences and cognitive processes in nest-site selection, especially in solitary bees. The majority of the bee species are solitary and in contrast to eusocial bees, solitary bees’ cognition and social information use have remained largely unstudied. Solitary cavity-nesting mason bees (Osmia spp.) are an ideal system to study interspecific information use in nest choice in the wild as many species share similar nesting requirements. Here, we show that the blue mason bee (O. caerulescens) and the orange-vented mason bee (O. leaiana) examine hallmarks of parasitization of the nests of red mason bees (O. bicornis) before deciding where to establish their own nests. They were also presented with contextual cues (geometric symbols) that could be linked to parasitization by observational learning. Subjects subsequently had the choice of nesting in a nest site marked by the symbol that matched, or did not match, the one seen at the parasitized or healthy nest. We show that the bees copied and rejected the symbol of the examined nest manipulated to exhibit successful and unsuccessful nesting, respectively. We conclude that solitary bees use interspecific information in their nest-site selection. In contrast with current theories of species coexistence, niche overlap between species may dynamically change depending on the observed success of surrounding individuals.
Author Gatto, Elia
Loukola, Olli J
Chittka, Lars
Híjar-Islas, Ana C
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Olli J
  surname: Loukola
  fullname: Loukola, Olli J
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Elia
  surname: Gatto
  fullname: Gatto, Elia
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ana C
  surname: Híjar-Islas
  fullname: Híjar-Islas, Ana C
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Lars
  surname: Chittka
  fullname: Chittka, Lars
BookMark eNp9kEtLAzEUhYNUsK3-AHcBN25G82iSmaUUX1hwoa6HTOYOTUknNUkF_70ZahUKmk1yb853OfdM0Kj3PSB0TskVpZJfU6GIEpIXjNCKMs6P0HjoFUNz9PMW4gRNYlwRwmYlJWP09AIOTLIfgG2fIMQNGNtZk6vOh7VO1vd4G4dfnJaAe4gJm6W3BrDvcPTOJh0-cQMQT9Fxp12Es-97it7ubl_nD8Xi-f5xfrMoGl5WqVBaS6UkpU1ZcgJcC6XaCjrVNG3ZMaFBMkkV023LWT5SC-CtBqBVK7USfIoud3M3wb9vs6F6baMB53QPfhtrNuMVL5kUg_TiQLry29Bnd1lFKKOV4iSr1E5lgo8xQFebvNWwegraupqSegi53odc70POJD0gN8GucyD_Mtc7pgnWuV9DfxNfn6KM4w
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_13055
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2023_12_007
crossref_primary_10_1111_ele_14184
crossref_primary_10_1098_rsbl_2022_0411
crossref_primary_10_3390_insects11110800
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10336_021_01900_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tics_2022_04_001
crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_220292
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2020_10_008
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00114_021_01739_9
crossref_primary_10_1134_S0013873822060021
crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2020_559690
crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2022_0142
crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_12954
crossref_primary_10_3390_genes12101466
crossref_primary_10_4039_tce_2023_10
crossref_primary_10_1242_jeb_242457
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright 2020 by Loukola et al.
Copyright Brill Academic Publishers, Inc. Apr 2020
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright 2020 by Loukola et al.
– notice: Copyright Brill Academic Publishers, Inc. Apr 2020
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7QG
7QL
7SN
7SS
7T7
7U9
8FD
C1K
FR3
H94
M7N
P64
RC3
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1163/15707563-20191233
DatabaseName CrossRef
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Ecology Abstracts
Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Ecology Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Entomology Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
AGRICOLA

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Zoology
EISSN 1570-7563
EndPage 225
ExternalDocumentID 10_1163_15707563_20191233
GroupedDBID .EH
0R~
23M
3Q-
4.4
53G
5GY
5VS
63Z
AACRU
AAMSZ
AAOTM
AAXJT
ABDBF
ABJNI
ABJWF
ABNDG
ABNTP
ABPTK
ABUBZ
ACGFS
ACLGF
ACPRK
ACVUQ
ACWTZ
ADDNY
ADIZZ
ADMQJ
ADOBN
AEALX
AENEX
AEVUW
AEYCS
AFRAH
AHNKD
AJDYO
AJQST
AJUIR
ALJKW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFWP
AMUOF
AOGPY
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BBTKD
CAG
COF
CS3
EAP
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMK
EPL
ESX
E~D
F.3
F0L
F5P
FEDTE
HG6
HVGLF
HZ~
IL9
IY5
KAT
KC5
KOBVO
KWM
KWN
MVM
O9-
QM4
QO4
RNI
ROL
RZC
RZE
VG3
X4A
~FV
AAAXD
AAHBH
AAOGP
AAYXX
ABXFW
ACUHS
ADZLE
AEASU
AHYGR
CITATION
7QG
7QL
7SN
7SS
7T7
7U9
8FD
C1K
FR3
H94
M7N
P64
RC3
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-b389t-7aa677611b8830e3a577d9ef7bbd8f25ae626172add322226a5e3daee19d6a753
ISSN 1570-7555
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 04:52:32 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 11:58:48 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:06:15 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:15 EDT 2025
Wed Dec 27 17:49:30 EST 2023
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b389t-7aa677611b8830e3a577d9ef7bbd8f25ae626172add322226a5e3daee19d6a753
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-20191233
PQID 2401219730
PQPubID 2047834
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2439382655
proquest_journals_2401219730
crossref_citationtrail_10_1163_15707563_20191233
crossref_primary_10_1163_15707563_20191233
brill_journals_10_1163_15707563_20191233
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Leiden|Boston
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Leiden|Boston
– name: Leiden
PublicationTitle Animal biology (Leiden, Netherlands)
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Brill
Brill Academic Publishers, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Brill
– name: Brill Academic Publishers, Inc
SSID ssj0024810
Score 2.29678
Snippet Abstract Most of the studies on learning in bees have focused on the foraging context; we know little about the preferences and cognitive processes in...
Most of the studies on learning in bees have focused on the foraging context; we know little about the preferences and cognitive processes in nest-site...
SourceID proquest
crossref
brill
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 215
SubjectTerms Animal behavior
Bees
Cavity nesting
Coexistence
Cognition
Cognitive ability
foraging
geometry
insect nests
Interspecific
Learning
Nesting
nesting sites
Nests
Niche overlap
Observational learning
Osmia rufa
parasitism
Site selection
Social interactions
solitary bees
Species
Title Selective interspecific information use in the nest choice of solitary bees
URI http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-20191233
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2401219730
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2439382655
Volume 70
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELegExIvaHyJsoGMxAOiykicxEkf91UqKNsDrVTxEtmJo5WFZGrTF_567mwnaTQ0DV6iNnHiyPfL-c6--x0h7wPOBWOCO1EghROkKnBknOWOVGCbpl6cZgIdxW8XfLoIvizDZbeUrbNLanmU_v5rXsn_SBXOgVwxS_YfJNs-FE7Ab5AvHEHCcLyXjL_rIjYY-4OsDzprEiN_RpYNVYt2u1FNLCNotXoE6g50A9qIGwx9w6A5qWwgYUuqvPoFkmv4mbDoB7JhmcysLkF4ZxFhVm2vwUfGBpdFser2mj6LWtdpwvCxdgKY6t35s59i7SAiTT3kUnQLtqdXq7q-FiZve91bmWDuTkCLVaaR60ShoeFttK0pE2JRxUY3R2BzOIyFPSUa7szH9tptVc-RcgL7iELuAy7A82SGVKNPq31xmUwWs1kyP1_OH5I9Bv4EG5C945Ozk0lHyxgb4ormle0GOHTy6VYX4MfI9aoo-qZMfybX5sl8nzyxfgU9NiB5Sh6o8hl59KPSInxOvrZQoT2o0B2oUIAK_KcgYIpQoQYqtMppAxWKUHlBFpPz-enUsXU0HAnmaO1EQvAo4p4n49h3lS_CKMrGKo-kzOKchUJx5OVnMNXhvhvjIlR-JpTyxhkX4M--JIOyKtUrQtHbDXL4rFMZIPOdCDKVyVzF0vfBEnaH5IMemsR-JZtEO5ncT5pRTJpRHBK3Gb0ktXz0WBaluOuWj-0tN4aM5a7Gh41IurcB-9WDORqmtSF5114GjYrbZKJU1Rbb-GMfvO4wfH2PNgfkcYf9QzKo11v1BuzUWr61GPsDXWmLiQ
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selective+interspecific+information+use+in+the+nest+choice+of+solitary+bees&rft.jtitle=Animal+biology+%28Leiden%2C+Netherlands%29&rft.au=Loukola%2C+Olli+J&rft.au=Gatto%2C+Elia&rft.au=H%C3%ADjar-Islas%2C+Ana+C&rft.au=Chittka%2C+Lars&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.issn=1570-7555&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=2+p.215-225&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=225&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163%2F15707563-20191233&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1570-7555&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1570-7555&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1570-7555&client=summon