Selective interspecific information use in the nest choice of solitary bees
Abstract Most of the studies on learning in bees have focused on the foraging context; we know little about the preferences and cognitive processes in nest-site selection, especially in solitary bees. The majority of the bee species are solitary and in contrast to eusocial bees, solitary bees’ cogni...
Saved in:
Published in | Animal biology (Leiden, Netherlands) Vol. 70; no. 2; pp. 215 - 225 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Leiden|Boston
Brill
01.04.2020
Brill Academic Publishers, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Abstract
Most of the studies on learning in bees have focused on the foraging context; we know little about the preferences and cognitive processes in nest-site selection, especially in solitary bees. The majority of the bee species are solitary and in contrast to eusocial bees, solitary bees’ cognition and social information use have remained largely unstudied. Solitary cavity-nesting mason bees (Osmia spp.) are an ideal system to study interspecific information use in nest choice in the wild as many species share similar nesting requirements. Here, we show that the blue mason bee (O. caerulescens) and the orange-vented mason bee (O. leaiana) examine hallmarks of parasitization of the nests of red mason bees (O. bicornis) before deciding where to establish their own nests. They were also presented with contextual cues (geometric symbols) that could be linked to parasitization by observational learning. Subjects subsequently had the choice of nesting in a nest site marked by the symbol that matched, or did not match, the one seen at the parasitized or healthy nest. We show that the bees copied and rejected the symbol of the examined nest manipulated to exhibit successful and unsuccessful nesting, respectively. We conclude that solitary bees use interspecific information in their nest-site selection. In contrast with current theories of species coexistence, niche overlap between species may dynamically change depending on the observed success of surrounding individuals. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Most of the studies on learning in bees have focused on the foraging context; we know little about the preferences and cognitive processes in nest-site selection, especially in solitary bees. The majority of the bee species are solitary and in contrast to eusocial bees, solitary bees’ cognition and social information use have remained largely unstudied. Solitary cavity-nesting mason bees (
Osmia
spp.) are an ideal system to study interspecific information use in nest choice in the wild as many species share similar nesting requirements. Here, we show that the blue mason bee (
O. caerulescens
) and the orange-vented mason bee (
O. leaiana
) examine hallmarks of parasitization of the nests of red mason bees (
O. bicornis
) before deciding where to establish their own nests. They were also presented with contextual cues (geometric symbols) that could be linked to parasitization by observational learning. Subjects subsequently had the choice of nesting in a nest site marked by the symbol that matched, or did not match, the one seen at the parasitized or healthy nest. We show that the bees copied and rejected the symbol of the examined nest manipulated to exhibit successful and unsuccessful nesting, respectively. We conclude that solitary bees use interspecific information in their nest-site selection. In contrast with current theories of species coexistence, niche overlap between species may dynamically change depending on the observed success of surrounding individuals. Most of the studies on learning in bees have focused on the foraging context; we know little about the preferences and cognitive processes in nest-site selection, especially in solitary bees. The majority of the bee species are solitary and in contrast to eusocial bees, solitary bees' cognition and social information use have remained largely unstudied. Solitary cavity-nesting mason bees (Osmia spp.) are an ideal system to study interspecific information use in nest choice in the wild as many species share similar nesting requirements. Here, we show that the blue mason bee (O. caerulescens) and the orange-vented mason bee (O. leaiana) examine hallmarks of parasitization of the nests of red mason bees (O. bicornis) before deciding where to establish their own nests. They were also presented with contextual cues (geometric symbols) that could be linked to parasitization by observational learning. Subjects subsequently had the choice of nesting in a nest site marked by the symbol that matched, or did not match, the one seen at the parasitized or healthy nest. We show that the bees copied and rejected the symbol of the examined nest manipulated to exhibit successful and unsuccessful nesting, respectively. We conclude that solitary bees use interspecific information in their nest-site selection. In contrast with current theories of species coexistence, niche overlap between species may dynamically change depending on the observed success of surrounding individuals. Abstract Most of the studies on learning in bees have focused on the foraging context; we know little about the preferences and cognitive processes in nest-site selection, especially in solitary bees. The majority of the bee species are solitary and in contrast to eusocial bees, solitary bees’ cognition and social information use have remained largely unstudied. Solitary cavity-nesting mason bees (Osmia spp.) are an ideal system to study interspecific information use in nest choice in the wild as many species share similar nesting requirements. Here, we show that the blue mason bee (O. caerulescens) and the orange-vented mason bee (O. leaiana) examine hallmarks of parasitization of the nests of red mason bees (O. bicornis) before deciding where to establish their own nests. They were also presented with contextual cues (geometric symbols) that could be linked to parasitization by observational learning. Subjects subsequently had the choice of nesting in a nest site marked by the symbol that matched, or did not match, the one seen at the parasitized or healthy nest. We show that the bees copied and rejected the symbol of the examined nest manipulated to exhibit successful and unsuccessful nesting, respectively. We conclude that solitary bees use interspecific information in their nest-site selection. In contrast with current theories of species coexistence, niche overlap between species may dynamically change depending on the observed success of surrounding individuals. |
Author | Gatto, Elia Loukola, Olli J Chittka, Lars Híjar-Islas, Ana C |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Olli J surname: Loukola fullname: Loukola, Olli J – sequence: 2 givenname: Elia surname: Gatto fullname: Gatto, Elia – sequence: 3 givenname: Ana C surname: Híjar-Islas fullname: Híjar-Islas, Ana C – sequence: 4 givenname: Lars surname: Chittka fullname: Chittka, Lars |
BookMark | eNp9kEtLAzEUhYNUsK3-AHcBN25G82iSmaUUX1hwoa6HTOYOTUknNUkF_70ZahUKmk1yb853OfdM0Kj3PSB0TskVpZJfU6GIEpIXjNCKMs6P0HjoFUNz9PMW4gRNYlwRwmYlJWP09AIOTLIfgG2fIMQNGNtZk6vOh7VO1vd4G4dfnJaAe4gJm6W3BrDvcPTOJh0-cQMQT9Fxp12Es-97it7ubl_nD8Xi-f5xfrMoGl5WqVBaS6UkpU1ZcgJcC6XaCjrVNG3ZMaFBMkkV023LWT5SC-CtBqBVK7USfIoud3M3wb9vs6F6baMB53QPfhtrNuMVL5kUg_TiQLry29Bnd1lFKKOV4iSr1E5lgo8xQFebvNWwegraupqSegi53odc70POJD0gN8GucyD_Mtc7pgnWuV9DfxNfn6KM4w |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_13055 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2023_12_007 crossref_primary_10_1111_ele_14184 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsbl_2022_0411 crossref_primary_10_3390_insects11110800 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10336_021_01900_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tics_2022_04_001 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_220292 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2020_10_008 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00114_021_01739_9 crossref_primary_10_1134_S0013873822060021 crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2020_559690 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2022_0142 crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_12954 crossref_primary_10_3390_genes12101466 crossref_primary_10_4039_tce_2023_10 crossref_primary_10_1242_jeb_242457 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright 2020 by Loukola et al. Copyright Brill Academic Publishers, Inc. Apr 2020 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright 2020 by Loukola et al. – notice: Copyright Brill Academic Publishers, Inc. Apr 2020 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7QG 7QL 7SN 7SS 7T7 7U9 8FD C1K FR3 H94 M7N P64 RC3 7S9 L.6 |
DOI | 10.1163/15707563-20191233 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Virology and AIDS Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Virology and AIDS Abstracts Technology Research Database Ecology Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Engineering Research Database Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Virology and AIDS Abstracts AGRICOLA |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Zoology |
EISSN | 1570-7563 |
EndPage | 225 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1163_15707563_20191233 |
GroupedDBID | .EH 0R~ 23M 3Q- 4.4 53G 5GY 5VS 63Z AACRU AAMSZ AAOTM AAXJT ABDBF ABJNI ABJWF ABNDG ABNTP ABPTK ABUBZ ACGFS ACLGF ACPRK ACVUQ ACWTZ ADDNY ADIZZ ADMQJ ADOBN AEALX AENEX AEVUW AEYCS AFRAH AHNKD AJDYO AJQST AJUIR ALJKW ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFWP AMUOF AOGPY ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BBTKD CAG COF CS3 EAP EBD EBS EJD EMK EPL ESX E~D F.3 F0L F5P FEDTE HG6 HVGLF HZ~ IL9 IY5 KAT KC5 KOBVO KWM KWN MVM O9- QM4 QO4 RNI ROL RZC RZE VG3 X4A ~FV AAAXD AAHBH AAOGP AAYXX ABXFW ACUHS ADZLE AEASU AHYGR CITATION 7QG 7QL 7SN 7SS 7T7 7U9 8FD C1K FR3 H94 M7N P64 RC3 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-b389t-7aa677611b8830e3a577d9ef7bbd8f25ae626172add322226a5e3daee19d6a753 |
ISSN | 1570-7555 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 04:52:32 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 11:58:48 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:06:15 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:15 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 27 17:49:30 EST 2023 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b389t-7aa677611b8830e3a577d9ef7bbd8f25ae626172add322226a5e3daee19d6a753 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-20191233 |
PQID | 2401219730 |
PQPubID | 2047834 |
PageCount | 11 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2439382655 proquest_journals_2401219730 crossref_citationtrail_10_1163_15707563_20191233 crossref_primary_10_1163_15707563_20191233 brill_journals_10_1163_15707563_20191233 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-04-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2020 text: 2020-04-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Leiden|Boston |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Leiden|Boston – name: Leiden |
PublicationTitle | Animal biology (Leiden, Netherlands) |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Brill Brill Academic Publishers, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Brill – name: Brill Academic Publishers, Inc |
SSID | ssj0024810 |
Score | 2.29678 |
Snippet | Abstract
Most of the studies on learning in bees have focused on the foraging context; we know little about the preferences and cognitive processes in... Most of the studies on learning in bees have focused on the foraging context; we know little about the preferences and cognitive processes in nest-site... |
SourceID | proquest crossref brill |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 215 |
SubjectTerms | Animal behavior Bees Cavity nesting Coexistence Cognition Cognitive ability foraging geometry insect nests Interspecific Learning Nesting nesting sites Nests Niche overlap Observational learning Osmia rufa parasitism Site selection Social interactions solitary bees Species |
Title | Selective interspecific information use in the nest choice of solitary bees |
URI | http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-20191233 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2401219730 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2439382655 |
Volume | 70 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELegExIvaHyJsoGMxAOiykicxEkf91UqKNsDrVTxEtmJo5WFZGrTF_567mwnaTQ0DV6iNnHiyPfL-c6--x0h7wPOBWOCO1EghROkKnBknOWOVGCbpl6cZgIdxW8XfLoIvizDZbeUrbNLanmU_v5rXsn_SBXOgVwxS_YfJNs-FE7Ab5AvHEHCcLyXjL_rIjYY-4OsDzprEiN_RpYNVYt2u1FNLCNotXoE6g50A9qIGwx9w6A5qWwgYUuqvPoFkmv4mbDoB7JhmcysLkF4ZxFhVm2vwUfGBpdFser2mj6LWtdpwvCxdgKY6t35s59i7SAiTT3kUnQLtqdXq7q-FiZve91bmWDuTkCLVaaR60ShoeFttK0pE2JRxUY3R2BzOIyFPSUa7szH9tptVc-RcgL7iELuAy7A82SGVKNPq31xmUwWs1kyP1_OH5I9Bv4EG5C945Ozk0lHyxgb4ormle0GOHTy6VYX4MfI9aoo-qZMfybX5sl8nzyxfgU9NiB5Sh6o8hl59KPSInxOvrZQoT2o0B2oUIAK_KcgYIpQoQYqtMppAxWKUHlBFpPz-enUsXU0HAnmaO1EQvAo4p4n49h3lS_CKMrGKo-kzOKchUJx5OVnMNXhvhvjIlR-JpTyxhkX4M--JIOyKtUrQtHbDXL4rFMZIPOdCDKVyVzF0vfBEnaH5IMemsR-JZtEO5ncT5pRTJpRHBK3Gb0ktXz0WBaluOuWj-0tN4aM5a7Gh41IurcB-9WDORqmtSF5114GjYrbZKJU1Rbb-GMfvO4wfH2PNgfkcYf9QzKo11v1BuzUWr61GPsDXWmLiQ |
linkProvider | EBSCOhost |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selective+interspecific+information+use+in+the+nest+choice+of+solitary+bees&rft.jtitle=Animal+biology+%28Leiden%2C+Netherlands%29&rft.au=Loukola%2C+Olli+J&rft.au=Gatto%2C+Elia&rft.au=H%C3%ADjar-Islas%2C+Ana+C&rft.au=Chittka%2C+Lars&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.issn=1570-7555&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=2+p.215-225&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=225&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163%2F15707563-20191233&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1570-7555&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1570-7555&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1570-7555&client=summon |