Randomized controlled trial of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures

BackgroundWe present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body compression fractures.MethodsPatients with vertebral body compression fractures were randomly assigned to treatment with kyphoplasty or vertebropl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurointerventional surgery Vol. 8; no. 7; pp. 756 - 763
Main Authors Evans, Avery J, Kip, Kevin E, Brinjikji, Waleed, Layton, Kennith F, Jensen, Mary L, Gaughen, John R, Kallmes, David F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.07.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1759-8478
1759-8486
DOI10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011811

Cover

Loading…
Abstract BackgroundWe present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body compression fractures.MethodsPatients with vertebral body compression fractures were randomly assigned to treatment with kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. Primary endpoints were pain (0–10 scale) and disability assessed using the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Outcomes were assessed at 3 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year following the procedure.Results115 subjects were enrolled in the trial with 59 (51.3%) randomly assigned to kyphoplasty and 56 (48.7%) assigned to vertebroplasty. Mean (SD) pain scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, and 1 year for kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty were 7.4 (1.9) vs 7.9 (2.0), 4.1 (2.8) vs 3.7 (3.0), 3.4 (2.5) vs 3.6 (2.9), and 3.0 (2.8) vs 2.3 (2.6), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). Mean (SD) RMDQ scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, 180 days, and 1 year were 17.3 (6.6) vs 16.3 (7.4), 11.8 (7.9) vs 10.9 (8.2), 8.6 (7.2) vs 8.8 (8.5), 7.9 (7.4) vs 7.3 (7.7), 7.5 (7.2) vs 6.7 (8.0), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). For baseline to 12-month assessment in average pain and RMDQ scores, the standardized effect size between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty was small at −0.36 (95% CI −1.02 to 0.31) and −0.04 (95% CI −1.68 to 1.60), respectively.ConclusionsOur study indicates that vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty appear to be equally effective in substantially reducing pain and disability in patients with vertebral body compression fractures.Trial registration numberNCT00279877.
AbstractList Background We present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body compression fractures. Methods Patients with vertebral body compression fractures were randomly assigned to treatment with kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. Primary endpoints were pain (0-10 scale) and disability assessed using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Outcomes were assessed at 3 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year following the procedure. Results 115 subjects were enrolled in the trial with 59 (51.3%) randomly assigned to kyphoplasty and 56 (48.7%) assigned to vertebroplasty. Mean (SD) pain scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, and 1 year for kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty were 7.4 (1.9) vs 7.9 (2.0), 4.1 (2.8) vs 3.7 (3.0), 3.4 (2.5) vs 3.6 (2.9), and 3.0 (2.8) vs 2.3 (2.6), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). Mean (SD) RMDQ scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, 180 days, and 1 year were 17.3 (6.6) vs 16.3 (7.4), 11.8 (7.9) vs 10.9 (8.2), 8.6 (7.2) vs 8.8 (8.5), 7.9 (7.4) vs 7.3 (7.7), 7.5 (7.2) vs 6.7 (8.0), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). For baseline to 12-month assessment in average pain and RMDQ scores, the standardized effect size between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty was small at -0.36 (95% CI -1.02 to 0.31) and -0.04 (95% CI -1.68 to 1.60), respectively. Conclusions Our study indicates that vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty appear to be equally effective in substantially reducing pain and disability in patients with vertebral body compression fractures. Trial registration number NCT00279877.
BACKGROUNDWe present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body compression fractures.METHODSPatients with vertebral body compression fractures were randomly assigned to treatment with kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. Primary endpoints were pain (0-10 scale) and disability assessed using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Outcomes were assessed at 3 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year following the procedure.RESULTS115 subjects were enrolled in the trial with 59 (51.3%) randomly assigned to kyphoplasty and 56 (48.7%) assigned to vertebroplasty. Mean (SD) pain scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, and 1 year for kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty were 7.4 (1.9) vs 7.9 (2.0), 4.1 (2.8) vs 3.7 (3.0), 3.4 (2.5) vs 3.6 (2.9), and 3.0 (2.8) vs 2.3 (2.6), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). Mean (SD) RMDQ scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, 180 days, and 1 year were 17.3 (6.6) vs 16.3 (7.4), 11.8 (7.9) vs 10.9 (8.2), 8.6 (7.2) vs 8.8 (8.5), 7.9 (7.4) vs 7.3 (7.7), 7.5 (7.2) vs 6.7 (8.0), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). For baseline to 12-month assessment in average pain and RMDQ scores, the standardized effect size between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty was small at -0.36 (95% CI -1.02 to 0.31) and -0.04 (95% CI -1.68 to 1.60), respectively.CONCLUSIONSOur study indicates that vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty appear to be equally effective in substantially reducing pain and disability in patients with vertebral body compression fractures.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERNCT00279877.
We present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body compression fractures. Patients with vertebral body compression fractures were randomly assigned to treatment with kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. Primary endpoints were pain (0-10 scale) and disability assessed using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Outcomes were assessed at 3 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year following the procedure. 115 subjects were enrolled in the trial with 59 (51.3%) randomly assigned to kyphoplasty and 56 (48.7%) assigned to vertebroplasty. Mean (SD) pain scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, and 1 year for kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty were 7.4 (1.9) vs 7.9 (2.0), 4.1 (2.8) vs 3.7 (3.0), 3.4 (2.5) vs 3.6 (2.9), and 3.0 (2.8) vs 2.3 (2.6), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). Mean (SD) RMDQ scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, 180 days, and 1 year were 17.3 (6.6) vs 16.3 (7.4), 11.8 (7.9) vs 10.9 (8.2), 8.6 (7.2) vs 8.8 (8.5), 7.9 (7.4) vs 7.3 (7.7), 7.5 (7.2) vs 6.7 (8.0), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). For baseline to 12-month assessment in average pain and RMDQ scores, the standardized effect size between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty was small at -0.36 (95% CI -1.02 to 0.31) and -0.04 (95% CI -1.68 to 1.60), respectively. Our study indicates that vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty appear to be equally effective in substantially reducing pain and disability in patients with vertebral body compression fractures. NCT00279877.
BackgroundWe present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body compression fractures.MethodsPatients with vertebral body compression fractures were randomly assigned to treatment with kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. Primary endpoints were pain (0–10 scale) and disability assessed using the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Outcomes were assessed at 3 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year following the procedure.Results115 subjects were enrolled in the trial with 59 (51.3%) randomly assigned to kyphoplasty and 56 (48.7%) assigned to vertebroplasty. Mean (SD) pain scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, and 1 year for kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty were 7.4 (1.9) vs 7.9 (2.0), 4.1 (2.8) vs 3.7 (3.0), 3.4 (2.5) vs 3.6 (2.9), and 3.0 (2.8) vs 2.3 (2.6), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). Mean (SD) RMDQ scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, 180 days, and 1 year were 17.3 (6.6) vs 16.3 (7.4), 11.8 (7.9) vs 10.9 (8.2), 8.6 (7.2) vs 8.8 (8.5), 7.9 (7.4) vs 7.3 (7.7), 7.5 (7.2) vs 6.7 (8.0), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). For baseline to 12-month assessment in average pain and RMDQ scores, the standardized effect size between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty was small at −0.36 (95% CI −1.02 to 0.31) and −0.04 (95% CI −1.68 to 1.60), respectively.ConclusionsOur study indicates that vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty appear to be equally effective in substantially reducing pain and disability in patients with vertebral body compression fractures.Trial registration numberNCT00279877.
Author Evans, Avery J
Brinjikji, Waleed
Kallmes, David F
Jensen, Mary L
Layton, Kennith F
Gaughen, John R
Kip, Kevin E
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Avery J
  surname: Evans
  fullname: Evans, Avery J
  email: aje5u@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
  organization: University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Kevin E
  surname: Kip
  fullname: Kip, Kevin E
  email: aje5u@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
  organization: University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Waleed
  surname: Brinjikji
  fullname: Brinjikji, Waleed
  email: aje5u@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
  organization: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Kennith F
  surname: Layton
  fullname: Layton, Kennith F
  email: aje5u@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
  organization: Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Mary L
  surname: Jensen
  fullname: Jensen, Mary L
  email: aje5u@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
  organization: University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
– sequence: 6
  givenname: John R
  surname: Gaughen
  fullname: Gaughen, John R
  email: aje5u@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
  organization: University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
– sequence: 7
  givenname: David F
  surname: Kallmes
  fullname: Kallmes, David F
  email: aje5u@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
  organization: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109687$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkclqHDEQhkVwiNdXcBpyyaUTadRa-uBDGJwFDIHgu5BaJVuTbqktqQ3jp7eGsY3xyZdaxPeXivqP0UGIARD6TPA3Qij_HmBJPpS8pJt2hQlrMSGSkA_oiAjWt7KT_OClFvIQHee8wZgLJtgndLjiBPdciiNU_ulg4-QfwDZDDCXFcaxlSV6PTXTNPaQCJsV51Llsd21ecvN_O98-P_nQlFuoCtBlglBeqeqIIU5zgpx9DI1LeihL7U7RR6fHDGdP-QRd_7y8Xv9ur_7--rP-cdUaKrvSdtjWNR2lWlLGuLHAgRrubD9ohp2hotN9R2qQQIlccTw4bq0BzJztDD1BX_dj5xTvFshFTT4PMI46QFyyIqIXjPZUkop-eYNu4pJCXU4RiUkn691wpc6fqMVMYNWc_KTTVj2fswJiDwwp5pzAvSAEq51x6pVxamec2htXlRdvlIMvuvidJdqP79Cv9nozbd796SN8PrfX
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1136_neurintsurg_2018_014481
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD006349_pub4
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD006349_pub3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2020_06_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0001_4079_19_30513_8
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41408_019_0187_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_020_06434_3
crossref_primary_10_1093_neuros_nyw076
crossref_primary_10_1136_neurintsurg_2015_011929
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00132_017_3455_x
crossref_primary_10_2147_JPR_S368493
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40141_017_0162_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2018_07_214
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2022_06_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2023_02_015
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40134_018_0288_2
crossref_primary_10_1136_neurintsurg_2020_016597
crossref_primary_10_1097_JOM_0000000000001983
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11657_022_01151_4
crossref_primary_10_1136_neurintsurg_2016_012279
crossref_primary_10_1302_2048_0105_45_360375
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_023_04267_6
crossref_primary_10_23736_S0390_5616_22_05642_9
crossref_primary_10_3174_ajnr_A5458
crossref_primary_10_23736_S2784_8469_20_04046_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spinee_2019_07_009
crossref_primary_10_14245_ns_2346996_498
crossref_primary_10_52965_001c_38609
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00270_017_1779_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2018_09_019
crossref_primary_10_4236_ojmn_2023_134019
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11357_024_01171_7
crossref_primary_10_47196_rar_v31i3_397
crossref_primary_10_1136_neurintsurg_2018_014231
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40520_019_01289_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuchi_2022_101401
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000011544
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_025_05621_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2024_07_127
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00198_018_4804_2
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000017810
crossref_primary_10_1177_2514183X19852920
crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000002893
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2020_08_216
crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_RVW_21_00045
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.047
10.1056/NEJMoa0900429
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03908.x
10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60010-6
10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160
10.2106/JBJS.K.01649
10.1056/NEJMoa0900563
10.1016/j.spinee.2011.07.002
10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.032
10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.361
10.1007/s00198-011-1639-5
10.1007/s00198-012-2102-y
10.3174/ajnr.A4127
10.1007/s00264-011-1283-x
10.1097/00007632-199509000-00011
10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.013
10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
10.1007/s00198-012-2100-0
10.1007/s00198-009-0952-8
10.2165/11633220-000000000-00000
10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006
10.3174/ajnr.A2502
10.1016/j.jocn.2012.05.038
10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60954-3
10.1002/jbmr.364
10.1037//0033-2909.111.2.361
10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011714
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing
Copyright: 2016 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing
Copyright_xml – notice: Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing
– notice: Copyright: 2016 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
BENPR
BTHHO
CCPQU
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
DOI 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011811
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central
BMJ Journals
ProQuest One Community College
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
BMJ Journals
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central (subscription)
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1759-8486
EndPage 763
ExternalDocumentID 4107270951
26109687
10_1136_neurintsurg_2015_011811
neurintsurg
Genre Multicenter Study
Comparative Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.VT
0R~
29L
53G
7X7
7~S
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAHLL
AAOJX
AAUVZ
AAWJN
AAWTL
ABJNI
ABKDF
ABMQD
ABTFR
ABUWG
ABVAJ
ACGFS
ACGTL
ACHTP
ACMFJ
ACOAB
ACOFX
ACQSR
ACTZY
ADBBV
ADCEG
ADUGQ
AEKJL
AENEX
AFKRA
AFWFF
AGQPQ
AHMBA
AHNKE
AHQMW
AI.
AJYBZ
AKKEP
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BENPR
BLJBA
BPHCQ
BTHHO
BVXVI
C45
CCPQU
CXRWF
DU5
EBS
F5P
FEDTE
FYUFA
H13
HAJ
HMCUK
HVGLF
HZ~
M1P
NXWIF
O9-
OVD
PHGZT
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
R53
RHI
RMJ
RV8
TEORI
UKHRP
UYXKK
V24
VH1
VM9
AAYXX
ACQHZ
ADGHP
AERUA
CITATION
PHGZM
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
YCJ
3V.
7XB
8FK
K9.
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQUKI
7X8
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-b384t-40d109f33a83556bde6e3b6fd9ca50fb374a9414a98e318260cf6ddbe05fd4b3
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 1759-8478
IngestDate Thu Sep 04 19:17:44 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 02:31:53 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:08:24 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:21:17 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:06:09 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:08:22 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 7
Keywords Spine
Balloon
Language English
License Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b384t-40d109f33a83556bde6e3b6fd9ca50fb374a9414a98e318260cf6ddbe05fd4b3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 26109687
PQID 1801485750
PQPubID 2041884
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1797539381
proquest_journals_1801485750
pubmed_primary_26109687
crossref_primary_10_1136_neurintsurg_2015_011811
crossref_citationtrail_10_1136_neurintsurg_2015_011811
bmj_primary_10_1136_neurintsurg_2015_011811
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20160700
2016-07-00
2016-Jul
20160701
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2016
  text: 20160700
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle Journal of neurointerventional surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neurointerv Surg
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Publisher_xml – name: BMJ Publishing Group LTD
References Liu, Liao, Tan 2010; 21
Goz, Koehler, Egorova 2011; 11
1990; 16
Goz, Errico, Weinreb 2015; 15
Dohm, Black, Dacre 2014; 35
Smieliauskas, Lam, Howard 2014; 219
Xing, Ma, Ma 2013; 20
Edidin, Ong, Lau 2012; 10
Roland, Fairbank 2000; 25
Brazier, Harper, Jones 1992; 305
Boonen, Van Meirhaeghe, Bastian 2011; 26
Klazen, Lohle, de Vries 2010; 376
Chen, Cohen, Skolasky 2013; 95
Patrick, Deyo, Atlas 1995; 20
Buchbinder, Osborne, Ebeling 2009; 361
Boonen, Wahl, Nauroy 2011; 22
Kallmes, Comstock, Heagerty 2009; 361
Ong, Lau, Kemner 2013; 24
Svedbom, Alvares, Cooper 2013; 24
McGraw, Wong 1992; 111
Sarkisian, Liu, Gutierrez 2000; 48
Gu, Brinjikji, Evans 2016; 8
Wardlaw, Cummings, Van Meirhaeghe 2009; 373
Kim, Vaccaro 2006; 6
Mehio, Lerner, Engelhart 2011; 32
Han, Wan, Ning 2011; 35
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.1
Smieliauskas (2024052302285418000_8.7.756.7) 2014; 219
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.5
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.4
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.3
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.2
Ong (2024052302285418000_8.7.756.23) 2013; 24
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.21
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.22
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.9
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.24
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.8
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.25
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.26
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.6
Goz (2024052302285418000_8.7.756.18) 2015; 15
Xing (2024052302285418000_8.7.756.20) 2013; 20
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.10
Patrick (2024052302285418000_8.7.756.16) 1995; 20
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.11
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.12
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.13
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.14
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.15
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.17
2024052302285418000_8.7.756.19
References_xml – volume: 219
  start-page: 525
  year: 2014
  article-title: Impact of negative clinical trial results for vertebroplasty on vertebral augmentation procedure rates
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.047
– volume: 361
  start-page: 557
  year: 2009
  article-title: A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900429
– volume: 48
  start-page: 170
  year: 2000
  article-title: Modifiable risk factors predict functional decline among older women: a prospectively validated clinical prediction tool. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group
  publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc
  doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03908.x
– volume: 373
  start-page: 1016
  year: 2009
  article-title: Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60010-6
– volume: 8
  start-page: 636
  year: 2016
  article-title: Outcomes of vertebroplasty compared with kyphoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: J Neurointerv Surg
– volume: 305
  start-page: 160
  year: 1992
  article-title: Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160
– volume: 95
  start-page: 1729
  year: 2013
  article-title: Impact of nonoperative treatment, vertebroplasty, and kyphoplasty on survival and morbidity after vertebral compression fracture in the medicare population
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01649
– volume: 361
  start-page: 569
  year: 2009
  article-title: A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900563
– volume: 11
  start-page: 737
  year: 2011
  article-title: Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty: trends in use in ambulatory and inpatient settings
  publication-title: Spine J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.07.002
– volume: 15
  start-page: 959
  year: 2015
  article-title: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: national outcomes and trends in utilization from 2005 through 2010
  publication-title: Spine J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.032
– volume: 111
  start-page: 361
  year: 1992
  article-title: A common language effect size statistic
  publication-title: Psychol Bull
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.361
– volume: 22
  start-page: 2915
  year: 2011
  article-title: Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1639-5
– volume: 24
  start-page: 355
  year: 2013
  article-title: Balloon kyphoplasty compared to vertebroplasty and nonsurgical management in patients hospitalised with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a UK cost-effectiveness analysis
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2102-y
– volume: 35
  start-page: 2227
  year: 2014
  article-title: A randomized trial comparing balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis
  publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
  doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4127
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1349
  year: 2011
  article-title: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials
  publication-title: Int Orthop
  doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1283-x
– volume: 20
  start-page: 1899
  year: 1995
  article-title: Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-199509000-00011
– volume: 6
  start-page: 479
  year: 2006
  article-title: Osteoporotic compression fractures of the spine; current options and considerations for treatment
  publication-title: Spine J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.013
– volume: 16
  start-page: 199
  year: 1990
  article-title: EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
  publication-title: Health Policy
  doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1437
  year: 2013
  article-title: Two-year cost comparison of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: are initial surgical costs misleading?
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2100-0
– volume: 21
  start-page: 359
  year: 2010
  article-title: Balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a prospective, comparative, and randomized clinical study
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0952-8
– volume: 10
  start-page: 273
  year: 2012
  article-title: Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for vertebral compression fractures
  publication-title: Appl Health Econ Health Policy
  doi: 10.2165/11633220-000000000-00000
– volume: 25
  start-page: 3115
  year: 2000
  article-title: The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1290
  year: 2011
  article-title: Comparative hospital economics and patient presentation: vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fracture
  publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
  doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2502
– volume: 20
  start-page: 795
  year: 2013
  article-title: A meta-analysis of balloon kyphoplasty compared to percutaneous vertebroplasty for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
  publication-title: J Clin Neurosci
  doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.05.038
– volume: 376
  start-page: 1085
  year: 2010
  article-title: Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60954-3
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1627
  year: 2011
  article-title: Balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of acute vertebral compression fractures: 2-year results from a randomized trial
  publication-title: J Bone Miner Res
  doi: 10.1002/jbmr.364
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.10
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0952-8
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.5
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60954-3
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.14
  doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.25
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900563
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.21
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01649
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.6
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60010-6
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.17
  doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.111.2.361
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.22
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2102-y
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.8
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.07.002
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.26
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900429
– volume: 15
  start-page: 959
  year: 2015
  ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.18
  article-title: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: national outcomes and trends in utilization from 2005 through 2010
  publication-title: Spine J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.032
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.4
  doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1283-x
– volume: 20
  start-page: 795
  year: 2013
  ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.20
  article-title: A meta-analysis of balloon kyphoplasty compared to percutaneous vertebroplasty for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
  publication-title: J Clin Neurosci
  doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.05.038
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.11
  doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4127
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.1
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.013
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.3
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1639-5
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.2
  doi: 10.1002/jbmr.364
– volume: 20
  start-page: 1899
  year: 1995
  ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.16
  article-title: Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-199509000-00011
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.24
  doi: 10.2165/11633220-000000000-00000
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.12
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1437
  year: 2013
  ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.23
  article-title: Two-year cost comparison of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: are initial surgical costs misleading?
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2100-0
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.15
  doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03908.x
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.19
  doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2502
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.9
  doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011714
– ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.13
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160
– volume: 219
  start-page: 525
  year: 2014
  ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.7
  article-title: Impact of negative clinical trial results for vertebroplasty on vertebral augmentation procedure rates
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.047
SSID ssj0067575
Score 2.2693777
Snippet BackgroundWe present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body...
We present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body compression...
Background We present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body...
BACKGROUNDWe present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
bmj
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 756
SubjectTerms Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Clinical trials
Comorbidity
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fractures, Compression - epidemiology
Fractures, Compression - surgery
Humans
Kyphoplasty - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Pain
Pain - epidemiology
Pain - surgery
Pain Measurement - methods
Questionnaires
Spinal Fractures - epidemiology
Spinal Fractures - surgery
Studies
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Variables
Vertebroplasty - methods
Title Randomized controlled trial of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures
URI https://jnis.bmj.com/content/8/7/756.full
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109687
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1801485750
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1797539381
Volume 8
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV07T8MwELagXVgQiFehICOxoYikdl1nQoBACIkKVUXqFsWxDeWRFJIM8Ou5S9wAA48tTuI4Op99d_bn-wg5SBiYRR0wj2umPR76zItlYjweh7IfSh30BJ5Gvh6Ky1t-NelP3IJb7mCV8zmxmqh1luAa-VGAaU6QTtI_nr14yBqFu6uOQmORtKvUZaDPg0kTcIEvXCXaBQsZejALS4fvCpg4wmyR07TIy9c7UJQAAWxg6wKwMOr54buN-sHxrAzQxQpZdp4jPam7epUsmHSNFKM41dnz9N1o6lDnT3BZcXHQzFJkW4aoN5uBk1y8YTEvc_r4Nruf35qmFHxA2gDOv9SCTyDivEbKptTigaoSSutkfHE-Prv0HJGCp5jkBcSIOvBDy1gM_lZfKG2EYUpYHSIhglVsAF3DA-wfXBKFECexQmtl_L7VXLEN0kqz1GwRagX3Y80ZlzzkwvRUomIte0ollnEjTYccgvyiWZ0pI6oiDCaiL9KOUNpRLe0OEXM5R4lLSY7MGE9_V_Sbiv9uqzvvyMgN0zz6VKoO2W8ewwDDXZM4NVkJ7wzw7HEInk2HbNYK0LTZw2T1Qg62f__4DlmCPxE1yrdLWsVraXbBlynUXqWwe6R9ej68GX0AVfr3zQ
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6V7QEuFYjXlgJGghOKmsRer3NAqIVWW9quULVIvVlxbMNCmyxNIrT8p_7HzuSxlAOPS29xEj80Hs98tucB8DLjqBZtxANhuQ1EEvIgVZkLRJqoUaJsFEvyRj6eyskn8eF0dLoGl70vDJlV9jKxEdS2yOiMfDuiMCeUTjJ8u_geUNYoul3tU2i0bHHolj9wy1a-OXiP8_sqjvf3Zu8mQZdVIDBciQo3TDYKE895iuBjJI110nEjvU0oO4A3fIzjFBENls4HEe9nXlprXDjyVhiOzd6CdUEOrQNY392bfjzpRT-C7yayL6rkJECxrzqDsojLbQpPOc-rsr74jJwZkcUcKtcIVZo5__q7UvwD0m003v5d2OigKttpeeserLn8PlQnaW6L8_lPZ1ln5n6Gj03yD1Z4RumdcZtdLBCVV0sqlnXJvi0XX_pX85wh6GQrC_drtbAJMnFvTXNz5smDq8bSA5jdBI0fwiAvcvcYmJciTK3gQolESBebzKRWxcZkngun3BBeI_30og3NoZstDZf6GrU1UVu31B6C7Omssy4GOqXiOPt3xXBV8b_72uonUndyodS_uHgIL1afcUXTNU2au6LGf8bk7JwglBrCo5YBVn3GFB1fqvHm3xt_Drcns-MjfXQwPXwCd3BUsjUx3oJBdVG7pwikKvOsY18G-oYXzBU77jSr
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VIiEuCMRroRQjwQlFm8RexzkgVLWsWgoVQkXamxXHdllok6VJhJZ_xr_rTF6UA49Lb3ESPzQee75JPs8APM85mkUb8UBYbgORhjzIVO4CkaVqliobxZJOI78_kvufxNvFbLEBP4ezMESrHPbEdqO2ZU7fyKcRhTmhdJLh1Pe0iA9789erbwFlkKI_rUM6jU5FDt36O7pv1auDPZzrF3E8f3O8ux_0GQYCw5Wo0XmyUZh6zjMEIjNprJOOG-ltSpkCvOEJjllENHD6VojYP_fSWuPCmbfCcGz2GlxPOIIqXErJYvT1EIa3MX7ROKcBGgDVU8siLqcUqHJZ1FVzfoI6GhF3Ds1shMbNnH353Tz-AfO2tm9-G271oJXtdFp2BzZccRfqj1lhy7PlD2dZT3g_xcs2DQgrPaNEz-hwlyvE5_WailVTsa_r1efh1rJgCD_ZyHW_VAubILJ7R9ItmKezXA2W7sHxVUj4PmwWZeEeAvNShJkVXCiRCulik5vMqtiY3HPhlJvAS5SfXnVBOnTr3HCpL0lbk7R1J-0JyEHOOu-joVNSjtN_VwzHiv_d19YwkbrfISr9S58n8Gx8jGubfthkhSsbfCehY88pgqoJPOgUYOwzpjj5UiWP_t74U7iBy0S_Ozg6fAw3cVCy4xpvwWZ93rgniKhqs93qLgN9xWvlAuPsN3I
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomized+controlled+trial+of+vertebroplasty+versus+kyphoplasty+in+the+treatment+of+vertebral+compression+fractures&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurointerventional+surgery&rft.au=Evans%2C+Avery+J&rft.au=Kip%2C+Kevin+E&rft.au=Brinjikji%2C+Waleed&rft.au=Layton%2C+Kennith+F&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.eissn=1759-8486&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136%2Fneurintsurg-2015-011811&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F26109687&rft.externalDocID=26109687
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1759-8478&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1759-8478&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1759-8478&client=summon