Randomized controlled trial of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures
BackgroundWe present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body compression fractures.MethodsPatients with vertebral body compression fractures were randomly assigned to treatment with kyphoplasty or vertebropl...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of neurointerventional surgery Vol. 8; no. 7; pp. 756 - 763 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
01.07.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1759-8478 1759-8486 |
DOI | 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011811 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | BackgroundWe present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body compression fractures.MethodsPatients with vertebral body compression fractures were randomly assigned to treatment with kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. Primary endpoints were pain (0–10 scale) and disability assessed using the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Outcomes were assessed at 3 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year following the procedure.Results115 subjects were enrolled in the trial with 59 (51.3%) randomly assigned to kyphoplasty and 56 (48.7%) assigned to vertebroplasty. Mean (SD) pain scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, and 1 year for kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty were 7.4 (1.9) vs 7.9 (2.0), 4.1 (2.8) vs 3.7 (3.0), 3.4 (2.5) vs 3.6 (2.9), and 3.0 (2.8) vs 2.3 (2.6), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). Mean (SD) RMDQ scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, 180 days, and 1 year were 17.3 (6.6) vs 16.3 (7.4), 11.8 (7.9) vs 10.9 (8.2), 8.6 (7.2) vs 8.8 (8.5), 7.9 (7.4) vs 7.3 (7.7), 7.5 (7.2) vs 6.7 (8.0), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). For baseline to 12-month assessment in average pain and RMDQ scores, the standardized effect size between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty was small at −0.36 (95% CI −1.02 to 0.31) and −0.04 (95% CI −1.68 to 1.60), respectively.ConclusionsOur study indicates that vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty appear to be equally effective in substantially reducing pain and disability in patients with vertebral body compression fractures.Trial registration numberNCT00279877. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background We present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body compression fractures. Methods Patients with vertebral body compression fractures were randomly assigned to treatment with kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. Primary endpoints were pain (0-10 scale) and disability assessed using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Outcomes were assessed at 3 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year following the procedure. Results 115 subjects were enrolled in the trial with 59 (51.3%) randomly assigned to kyphoplasty and 56 (48.7%) assigned to vertebroplasty. Mean (SD) pain scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, and 1 year for kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty were 7.4 (1.9) vs 7.9 (2.0), 4.1 (2.8) vs 3.7 (3.0), 3.4 (2.5) vs 3.6 (2.9), and 3.0 (2.8) vs 2.3 (2.6), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). Mean (SD) RMDQ scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, 180 days, and 1 year were 17.3 (6.6) vs 16.3 (7.4), 11.8 (7.9) vs 10.9 (8.2), 8.6 (7.2) vs 8.8 (8.5), 7.9 (7.4) vs 7.3 (7.7), 7.5 (7.2) vs 6.7 (8.0), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). For baseline to 12-month assessment in average pain and RMDQ scores, the standardized effect size between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty was small at -0.36 (95% CI -1.02 to 0.31) and -0.04 (95% CI -1.68 to 1.60), respectively. Conclusions Our study indicates that vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty appear to be equally effective in substantially reducing pain and disability in patients with vertebral body compression fractures. Trial registration number NCT00279877. BACKGROUNDWe present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body compression fractures.METHODSPatients with vertebral body compression fractures were randomly assigned to treatment with kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. Primary endpoints were pain (0-10 scale) and disability assessed using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Outcomes were assessed at 3 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year following the procedure.RESULTS115 subjects were enrolled in the trial with 59 (51.3%) randomly assigned to kyphoplasty and 56 (48.7%) assigned to vertebroplasty. Mean (SD) pain scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, and 1 year for kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty were 7.4 (1.9) vs 7.9 (2.0), 4.1 (2.8) vs 3.7 (3.0), 3.4 (2.5) vs 3.6 (2.9), and 3.0 (2.8) vs 2.3 (2.6), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). Mean (SD) RMDQ scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, 180 days, and 1 year were 17.3 (6.6) vs 16.3 (7.4), 11.8 (7.9) vs 10.9 (8.2), 8.6 (7.2) vs 8.8 (8.5), 7.9 (7.4) vs 7.3 (7.7), 7.5 (7.2) vs 6.7 (8.0), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). For baseline to 12-month assessment in average pain and RMDQ scores, the standardized effect size between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty was small at -0.36 (95% CI -1.02 to 0.31) and -0.04 (95% CI -1.68 to 1.60), respectively.CONCLUSIONSOur study indicates that vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty appear to be equally effective in substantially reducing pain and disability in patients with vertebral body compression fractures.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERNCT00279877. We present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body compression fractures. Patients with vertebral body compression fractures were randomly assigned to treatment with kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. Primary endpoints were pain (0-10 scale) and disability assessed using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Outcomes were assessed at 3 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year following the procedure. 115 subjects were enrolled in the trial with 59 (51.3%) randomly assigned to kyphoplasty and 56 (48.7%) assigned to vertebroplasty. Mean (SD) pain scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, and 1 year for kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty were 7.4 (1.9) vs 7.9 (2.0), 4.1 (2.8) vs 3.7 (3.0), 3.4 (2.5) vs 3.6 (2.9), and 3.0 (2.8) vs 2.3 (2.6), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). Mean (SD) RMDQ scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, 180 days, and 1 year were 17.3 (6.6) vs 16.3 (7.4), 11.8 (7.9) vs 10.9 (8.2), 8.6 (7.2) vs 8.8 (8.5), 7.9 (7.4) vs 7.3 (7.7), 7.5 (7.2) vs 6.7 (8.0), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). For baseline to 12-month assessment in average pain and RMDQ scores, the standardized effect size between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty was small at -0.36 (95% CI -1.02 to 0.31) and -0.04 (95% CI -1.68 to 1.60), respectively. Our study indicates that vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty appear to be equally effective in substantially reducing pain and disability in patients with vertebral body compression fractures. NCT00279877. BackgroundWe present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body compression fractures.MethodsPatients with vertebral body compression fractures were randomly assigned to treatment with kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. Primary endpoints were pain (0–10 scale) and disability assessed using the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Outcomes were assessed at 3 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year following the procedure.Results115 subjects were enrolled in the trial with 59 (51.3%) randomly assigned to kyphoplasty and 56 (48.7%) assigned to vertebroplasty. Mean (SD) pain scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, and 1 year for kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty were 7.4 (1.9) vs 7.9 (2.0), 4.1 (2.8) vs 3.7 (3.0), 3.4 (2.5) vs 3.6 (2.9), and 3.0 (2.8) vs 2.3 (2.6), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). Mean (SD) RMDQ scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, 180 days, and 1 year were 17.3 (6.6) vs 16.3 (7.4), 11.8 (7.9) vs 10.9 (8.2), 8.6 (7.2) vs 8.8 (8.5), 7.9 (7.4) vs 7.3 (7.7), 7.5 (7.2) vs 6.7 (8.0), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). For baseline to 12-month assessment in average pain and RMDQ scores, the standardized effect size between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty was small at −0.36 (95% CI −1.02 to 0.31) and −0.04 (95% CI −1.68 to 1.60), respectively.ConclusionsOur study indicates that vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty appear to be equally effective in substantially reducing pain and disability in patients with vertebral body compression fractures.Trial registration numberNCT00279877. |
Author | Evans, Avery J Brinjikji, Waleed Kallmes, David F Jensen, Mary L Layton, Kennith F Gaughen, John R Kip, Kevin E |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Avery J surname: Evans fullname: Evans, Avery J email: aje5u@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu organization: University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Kevin E surname: Kip fullname: Kip, Kevin E email: aje5u@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu organization: University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Waleed surname: Brinjikji fullname: Brinjikji, Waleed email: aje5u@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu organization: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Kennith F surname: Layton fullname: Layton, Kennith F email: aje5u@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu organization: Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: Mary L surname: Jensen fullname: Jensen, Mary L email: aje5u@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu organization: University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA – sequence: 6 givenname: John R surname: Gaughen fullname: Gaughen, John R email: aje5u@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu organization: University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA – sequence: 7 givenname: David F surname: Kallmes fullname: Kallmes, David F email: aje5u@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu organization: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109687$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkclqHDEQhkVwiNdXcBpyyaUTadRa-uBDGJwFDIHgu5BaJVuTbqktqQ3jp7eGsY3xyZdaxPeXivqP0UGIARD6TPA3Qij_HmBJPpS8pJt2hQlrMSGSkA_oiAjWt7KT_OClFvIQHee8wZgLJtgndLjiBPdciiNU_ulg4-QfwDZDDCXFcaxlSV6PTXTNPaQCJsV51Llsd21ecvN_O98-P_nQlFuoCtBlglBeqeqIIU5zgpx9DI1LeihL7U7RR6fHDGdP-QRd_7y8Xv9ur_7--rP-cdUaKrvSdtjWNR2lWlLGuLHAgRrubD9ohp2hotN9R2qQQIlccTw4bq0BzJztDD1BX_dj5xTvFshFTT4PMI46QFyyIqIXjPZUkop-eYNu4pJCXU4RiUkn691wpc6fqMVMYNWc_KTTVj2fswJiDwwp5pzAvSAEq51x6pVxamec2htXlRdvlIMvuvidJdqP79Cv9nozbd796SN8PrfX |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1136_neurintsurg_2018_014481 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD006349_pub4 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD006349_pub3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2020_06_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0001_4079_19_30513_8 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41408_019_0187_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_020_06434_3 crossref_primary_10_1093_neuros_nyw076 crossref_primary_10_1136_neurintsurg_2015_011929 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00132_017_3455_x crossref_primary_10_2147_JPR_S368493 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40141_017_0162_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2018_07_214 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2022_06_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2023_02_015 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40134_018_0288_2 crossref_primary_10_1136_neurintsurg_2020_016597 crossref_primary_10_1097_JOM_0000000000001983 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11657_022_01151_4 crossref_primary_10_1136_neurintsurg_2016_012279 crossref_primary_10_1302_2048_0105_45_360375 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_023_04267_6 crossref_primary_10_23736_S0390_5616_22_05642_9 crossref_primary_10_3174_ajnr_A5458 crossref_primary_10_23736_S2784_8469_20_04046_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spinee_2019_07_009 crossref_primary_10_14245_ns_2346996_498 crossref_primary_10_52965_001c_38609 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00270_017_1779_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2018_09_019 crossref_primary_10_4236_ojmn_2023_134019 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11357_024_01171_7 crossref_primary_10_47196_rar_v31i3_397 crossref_primary_10_1136_neurintsurg_2018_014231 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40520_019_01289_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuchi_2022_101401 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000011544 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_025_05621_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2024_07_127 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00198_018_4804_2 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000017810 crossref_primary_10_1177_2514183X19852920 crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000002893 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2020_08_216 crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_RVW_21_00045 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.047 10.1056/NEJMoa0900429 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03908.x 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60010-6 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160 10.2106/JBJS.K.01649 10.1056/NEJMoa0900563 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.07.002 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.032 10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.361 10.1007/s00198-011-1639-5 10.1007/s00198-012-2102-y 10.3174/ajnr.A4127 10.1007/s00264-011-1283-x 10.1097/00007632-199509000-00011 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.013 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 10.1007/s00198-012-2100-0 10.1007/s00198-009-0952-8 10.2165/11633220-000000000-00000 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006 10.3174/ajnr.A2502 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.05.038 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60954-3 10.1002/jbmr.364 10.1037//0033-2909.111.2.361 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011714 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing Copyright: 2016 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing – notice: Copyright: 2016 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA BENPR BTHHO CCPQU FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011811 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central BMJ Journals ProQuest One Community College Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) BMJ Journals Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central (subscription) url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1759-8486 |
EndPage | 763 |
ExternalDocumentID | 4107270951 26109687 10_1136_neurintsurg_2015_011811 neurintsurg |
Genre | Multicenter Study Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- .VT 0R~ 29L 53G 7X7 7~S 88E 8FI 8FJ AAHLL AAOJX AAUVZ AAWJN AAWTL ABJNI ABKDF ABMQD ABTFR ABUWG ABVAJ ACGFS ACGTL ACHTP ACMFJ ACOAB ACOFX ACQSR ACTZY ADBBV ADCEG ADUGQ AEKJL AENEX AFKRA AFWFF AGQPQ AHMBA AHNKE AHQMW AI. AJYBZ AKKEP ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BENPR BLJBA BPHCQ BTHHO BVXVI C45 CCPQU CXRWF DU5 EBS F5P FEDTE FYUFA H13 HAJ HMCUK HVGLF HZ~ M1P NXWIF O9- OVD PHGZT PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO R53 RHI RMJ RV8 TEORI UKHRP UYXKK V24 VH1 VM9 AAYXX ACQHZ ADGHP AERUA CITATION PHGZM CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM YCJ 3V. 7XB 8FK K9. PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI 7X8 PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-b384t-40d109f33a83556bde6e3b6fd9ca50fb374a9414a98e318260cf6ddbe05fd4b3 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 1759-8478 |
IngestDate | Thu Sep 04 19:17:44 EDT 2025 Sat Jul 26 02:31:53 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:08:24 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:21:17 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:09 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:08:22 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 7 |
Keywords | Spine Balloon |
Language | English |
License | Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b384t-40d109f33a83556bde6e3b6fd9ca50fb374a9414a98e318260cf6ddbe05fd4b3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
PMID | 26109687 |
PQID | 1801485750 |
PQPubID | 2041884 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1797539381 proquest_journals_1801485750 pubmed_primary_26109687 crossref_primary_10_1136_neurintsurg_2015_011811 crossref_citationtrail_10_1136_neurintsurg_2015_011811 bmj_primary_10_1136_neurintsurg_2015_011811 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20160700 2016-07-00 2016-Jul 20160701 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2016 text: 20160700 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Journal of neurointerventional surgery |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Neurointerv Surg |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group LTD |
Publisher_xml | – name: BMJ Publishing Group LTD |
References | Liu, Liao, Tan 2010; 21 Goz, Koehler, Egorova 2011; 11 1990; 16 Goz, Errico, Weinreb 2015; 15 Dohm, Black, Dacre 2014; 35 Smieliauskas, Lam, Howard 2014; 219 Xing, Ma, Ma 2013; 20 Edidin, Ong, Lau 2012; 10 Roland, Fairbank 2000; 25 Brazier, Harper, Jones 1992; 305 Boonen, Van Meirhaeghe, Bastian 2011; 26 Klazen, Lohle, de Vries 2010; 376 Chen, Cohen, Skolasky 2013; 95 Patrick, Deyo, Atlas 1995; 20 Buchbinder, Osborne, Ebeling 2009; 361 Boonen, Wahl, Nauroy 2011; 22 Kallmes, Comstock, Heagerty 2009; 361 Ong, Lau, Kemner 2013; 24 Svedbom, Alvares, Cooper 2013; 24 McGraw, Wong 1992; 111 Sarkisian, Liu, Gutierrez 2000; 48 Gu, Brinjikji, Evans 2016; 8 Wardlaw, Cummings, Van Meirhaeghe 2009; 373 Kim, Vaccaro 2006; 6 Mehio, Lerner, Engelhart 2011; 32 Han, Wan, Ning 2011; 35 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.1 Smieliauskas (2024052302285418000_8.7.756.7) 2014; 219 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.5 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.4 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.3 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.2 Ong (2024052302285418000_8.7.756.23) 2013; 24 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.21 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.22 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.9 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.24 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.8 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.25 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.26 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.6 Goz (2024052302285418000_8.7.756.18) 2015; 15 Xing (2024052302285418000_8.7.756.20) 2013; 20 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.10 Patrick (2024052302285418000_8.7.756.16) 1995; 20 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.11 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.12 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.13 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.14 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.15 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.17 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.19 |
References_xml | – volume: 219 start-page: 525 year: 2014 article-title: Impact of negative clinical trial results for vertebroplasty on vertebral augmentation procedure rates publication-title: J Am Coll Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.047 – volume: 361 start-page: 557 year: 2009 article-title: A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900429 – volume: 48 start-page: 170 year: 2000 article-title: Modifiable risk factors predict functional decline among older women: a prospectively validated clinical prediction tool. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03908.x – volume: 373 start-page: 1016 year: 2009 article-title: Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60010-6 – volume: 8 start-page: 636 year: 2016 article-title: Outcomes of vertebroplasty compared with kyphoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: J Neurointerv Surg – volume: 305 start-page: 160 year: 1992 article-title: Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160 – volume: 95 start-page: 1729 year: 2013 article-title: Impact of nonoperative treatment, vertebroplasty, and kyphoplasty on survival and morbidity after vertebral compression fracture in the medicare population publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01649 – volume: 361 start-page: 569 year: 2009 article-title: A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900563 – volume: 11 start-page: 737 year: 2011 article-title: Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty: trends in use in ambulatory and inpatient settings publication-title: Spine J doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.07.002 – volume: 15 start-page: 959 year: 2015 article-title: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: national outcomes and trends in utilization from 2005 through 2010 publication-title: Spine J doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.032 – volume: 111 start-page: 361 year: 1992 article-title: A common language effect size statistic publication-title: Psychol Bull doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.361 – volume: 22 start-page: 2915 year: 2011 article-title: Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures publication-title: Osteoporos Int doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1639-5 – volume: 24 start-page: 355 year: 2013 article-title: Balloon kyphoplasty compared to vertebroplasty and nonsurgical management in patients hospitalised with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a UK cost-effectiveness analysis publication-title: Osteoporos Int doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2102-y – volume: 35 start-page: 2227 year: 2014 article-title: A randomized trial comparing balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4127 – volume: 35 start-page: 1349 year: 2011 article-title: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials publication-title: Int Orthop doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1283-x – volume: 20 start-page: 1899 year: 1995 article-title: Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/00007632-199509000-00011 – volume: 6 start-page: 479 year: 2006 article-title: Osteoporotic compression fractures of the spine; current options and considerations for treatment publication-title: Spine J doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.013 – volume: 16 start-page: 199 year: 1990 article-title: EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life publication-title: Health Policy doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 – volume: 24 start-page: 1437 year: 2013 article-title: Two-year cost comparison of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: are initial surgical costs misleading? publication-title: Osteoporos Int doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2100-0 – volume: 21 start-page: 359 year: 2010 article-title: Balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a prospective, comparative, and randomized clinical study publication-title: Osteoporos Int doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0952-8 – volume: 10 start-page: 273 year: 2012 article-title: Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for vertebral compression fractures publication-title: Appl Health Econ Health Policy doi: 10.2165/11633220-000000000-00000 – volume: 25 start-page: 3115 year: 2000 article-title: The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006 – volume: 32 start-page: 1290 year: 2011 article-title: Comparative hospital economics and patient presentation: vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fracture publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2502 – volume: 20 start-page: 795 year: 2013 article-title: A meta-analysis of balloon kyphoplasty compared to percutaneous vertebroplasty for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures publication-title: J Clin Neurosci doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.05.038 – volume: 376 start-page: 1085 year: 2010 article-title: Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60954-3 – volume: 26 start-page: 1627 year: 2011 article-title: Balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of acute vertebral compression fractures: 2-year results from a randomized trial publication-title: J Bone Miner Res doi: 10.1002/jbmr.364 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.10 doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0952-8 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.5 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60954-3 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.14 doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.25 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900563 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.21 doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01649 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.6 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60010-6 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.17 doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.111.2.361 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.22 doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2102-y – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.8 doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.07.002 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.26 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900429 – volume: 15 start-page: 959 year: 2015 ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.18 article-title: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: national outcomes and trends in utilization from 2005 through 2010 publication-title: Spine J doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.032 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.4 doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1283-x – volume: 20 start-page: 795 year: 2013 ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.20 article-title: A meta-analysis of balloon kyphoplasty compared to percutaneous vertebroplasty for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures publication-title: J Clin Neurosci doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.05.038 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.11 doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4127 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.1 doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.013 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.3 doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1639-5 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.2 doi: 10.1002/jbmr.364 – volume: 20 start-page: 1899 year: 1995 ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.16 article-title: Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/00007632-199509000-00011 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.24 doi: 10.2165/11633220-000000000-00000 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.12 doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006 – volume: 24 start-page: 1437 year: 2013 ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.23 article-title: Two-year cost comparison of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: are initial surgical costs misleading? publication-title: Osteoporos Int doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2100-0 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.15 doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03908.x – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.19 doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2502 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.9 doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011714 – ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.13 doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160 – volume: 219 start-page: 525 year: 2014 ident: 2024052302285418000_8.7.756.7 article-title: Impact of negative clinical trial results for vertebroplasty on vertebral augmentation procedure rates publication-title: J Am Coll Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.047 |
SSID | ssj0067575 |
Score | 2.2693777 |
Snippet | BackgroundWe present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body... We present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body compression... Background We present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body... BACKGROUNDWe present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref bmj |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 756 |
SubjectTerms | Aged Aged, 80 and over Clinical trials Comorbidity Female Follow-Up Studies Fractures, Compression - epidemiology Fractures, Compression - surgery Humans Kyphoplasty - methods Male Middle Aged Mortality Pain Pain - epidemiology Pain - surgery Pain Measurement - methods Questionnaires Spinal Fractures - epidemiology Spinal Fractures - surgery Studies Surgery Treatment Outcome Variables Vertebroplasty - methods |
Title | Randomized controlled trial of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures |
URI | https://jnis.bmj.com/content/8/7/756.full https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109687 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1801485750 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1797539381 |
Volume | 8 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV07T8MwELagXVgQiFehICOxoYikdl1nQoBACIkKVUXqFsWxDeWRFJIM8Ou5S9wAA48tTuI4Op99d_bn-wg5SBiYRR0wj2umPR76zItlYjweh7IfSh30BJ5Gvh6Ky1t-NelP3IJb7mCV8zmxmqh1luAa-VGAaU6QTtI_nr14yBqFu6uOQmORtKvUZaDPg0kTcIEvXCXaBQsZejALS4fvCpg4wmyR07TIy9c7UJQAAWxg6wKwMOr54buN-sHxrAzQxQpZdp4jPam7epUsmHSNFKM41dnz9N1o6lDnT3BZcXHQzFJkW4aoN5uBk1y8YTEvc_r4Nruf35qmFHxA2gDOv9SCTyDivEbKptTigaoSSutkfHE-Prv0HJGCp5jkBcSIOvBDy1gM_lZfKG2EYUpYHSIhglVsAF3DA-wfXBKFECexQmtl_L7VXLEN0kqz1GwRagX3Y80ZlzzkwvRUomIte0ollnEjTYccgvyiWZ0pI6oiDCaiL9KOUNpRLe0OEXM5R4lLSY7MGE9_V_Sbiv9uqzvvyMgN0zz6VKoO2W8ewwDDXZM4NVkJ7wzw7HEInk2HbNYK0LTZw2T1Qg62f__4DlmCPxE1yrdLWsVraXbBlynUXqWwe6R9ej68GX0AVfr3zQ |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6V7QEuFYjXlgJGghOKmsRer3NAqIVWW9quULVIvVlxbMNCmyxNIrT8p_7HzuSxlAOPS29xEj80Hs98tucB8DLjqBZtxANhuQ1EEvIgVZkLRJqoUaJsFEvyRj6eyskn8eF0dLoGl70vDJlV9jKxEdS2yOiMfDuiMCeUTjJ8u_geUNYoul3tU2i0bHHolj9wy1a-OXiP8_sqjvf3Zu8mQZdVIDBciQo3TDYKE895iuBjJI110nEjvU0oO4A3fIzjFBENls4HEe9nXlprXDjyVhiOzd6CdUEOrQNY392bfjzpRT-C7yayL6rkJECxrzqDsojLbQpPOc-rsr74jJwZkcUcKtcIVZo5__q7UvwD0m003v5d2OigKttpeeserLn8PlQnaW6L8_lPZ1ln5n6Gj03yD1Z4RumdcZtdLBCVV0sqlnXJvi0XX_pX85wh6GQrC_drtbAJMnFvTXNz5smDq8bSA5jdBI0fwiAvcvcYmJciTK3gQolESBebzKRWxcZkngun3BBeI_30og3NoZstDZf6GrU1UVu31B6C7Omssy4GOqXiOPt3xXBV8b_72uonUndyodS_uHgIL1afcUXTNU2au6LGf8bk7JwglBrCo5YBVn3GFB1fqvHm3xt_Drcns-MjfXQwPXwCd3BUsjUx3oJBdVG7pwikKvOsY18G-oYXzBU77jSr |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VIiEuCMRroRQjwQlFm8RexzkgVLWsWgoVQkXamxXHdllok6VJhJZ_xr_rTF6UA49Lb3ESPzQee75JPs8APM85mkUb8UBYbgORhjzIVO4CkaVqliobxZJOI78_kvufxNvFbLEBP4ezMESrHPbEdqO2ZU7fyKcRhTmhdJLh1Pe0iA9789erbwFlkKI_rUM6jU5FDt36O7pv1auDPZzrF3E8f3O8ux_0GQYCw5Wo0XmyUZh6zjMEIjNprJOOG-ltSpkCvOEJjllENHD6VojYP_fSWuPCmbfCcGz2GlxPOIIqXErJYvT1EIa3MX7ROKcBGgDVU8siLqcUqHJZ1FVzfoI6GhF3Ds1shMbNnH353Tz-AfO2tm9-G271oJXtdFp2BzZccRfqj1lhy7PlD2dZT3g_xcs2DQgrPaNEz-hwlyvE5_WailVTsa_r1efh1rJgCD_ZyHW_VAubILJ7R9ItmKezXA2W7sHxVUj4PmwWZeEeAvNShJkVXCiRCulik5vMqtiY3HPhlJvAS5SfXnVBOnTr3HCpL0lbk7R1J-0JyEHOOu-joVNSjtN_VwzHiv_d19YwkbrfISr9S58n8Gx8jGubfthkhSsbfCehY88pgqoJPOgUYOwzpjj5UiWP_t74U7iBy0S_Ozg6fAw3cVCy4xpvwWZ93rgniKhqs93qLgN9xWvlAuPsN3I |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomized+controlled+trial+of+vertebroplasty+versus+kyphoplasty+in+the+treatment+of+vertebral+compression+fractures&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurointerventional+surgery&rft.au=Evans%2C+Avery+J&rft.au=Kip%2C+Kevin+E&rft.au=Brinjikji%2C+Waleed&rft.au=Layton%2C+Kennith+F&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.eissn=1759-8486&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136%2Fneurintsurg-2015-011811&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F26109687&rft.externalDocID=26109687 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1759-8478&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1759-8478&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1759-8478&client=summon |