Perspectives on Potential Soybean Yield Losses from Weeds in North America

Weeds are one of the most significant, and controllable, threats to crop production in North America. Monetary losses because of reduced soybean yield and decreased quality because of weed interference, as well as costs of controlling weeds, have a significant economic impact on net returns to produ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWeed technology Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 148 - 154
Main Authors Soltani, Nader, Dille, J. Anita, Burke, Ian C., Everman, Wesley J., VanGessel, Mark J., Davis, Vince M., Sikkema, Peter H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.01.2017
Weed Science Society of America
Subjects
Agricultural production
Best management practices (BMP)
Canada
census data
commodity prices
costs and returns
crop losses
Crop production
Crop yield
crops
Economic impact
economic loss
EDUCATION/EXTENSION
farms
Glycine max
Herbicides
Soybeans
statistics
United States
USA
Weed control
weed management
Weeds
United States > US
North America
Canada
United States
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Abstract Weeds are one of the most significant, and controllable, threats to crop production in North America. Monetary losses because of reduced soybean yield and decreased quality because of weed interference, as well as costs of controlling weeds, have a significant economic impact on net returns to producers. Previous Weed Science Society of America (WSSA) Weed Loss Committee reports, as chaired by Chandler (1984) and Bridges (1992), provided snapshots of the comparative crop yield losses because of weeds across geographic regions and crops within these regions after the implementation of weed control tactics. This manuscript is a second report from the current WSSA Weed Loss Committee on crop yield losses because of weeds, specifically in soybean. Yield loss estimates were determined from comparative observations of soybean yields between the weedy control and plots with greater than 95% weed control in studies conducted from 2007 to 2013. Researchers from each US state and Canadian province provided at least three and up to ten individual comparisons for each year, which were then averaged within a year, and then averaged over the seven years. These percent yield loss values were used to determine total soybean yield loss in t ha−1 and bu acre−1 based on average soybean yields for each state or province as well as current commodity prices for a given year as summarized by USDA-NASS (2014) and Statistics Canada (2015). Averaged across 2007 to 2013, weed interference in soybean caused a 52.1% yield loss. Based on 2012 census data in the US and Canada soybean was grown on 30,798,512 and 1,679,203 hectares with production of 80 million and 5 million tonnes, respectively. Using an average soybean price across 2007 to 2013 of US $389.81 t−1 ($10.61 bu−1), farm gate value would be reduced by US $16.2 billion in the US and $1.0 billion in Canada annually if no weed management tactics were employed. Nomenclature: Soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr Las malezas son una de las amenazas más significativas y controlables para la producción agrícola en Norteamérica. Las pérdidas monetarias producto de la reducción en el rendimiento de la soja y la disminución en la calidad debido a la interferencia de malezas y al costo de controlar a estas, tiene un impacto económico significativo en la rentabilidad de los productores. Reportes previos del comité de pérdidas por malezas de la Sociedad Americana de la Ciencia de Malezas (WSSA), bajo la dirección de Chandler (1984) y Bridges (1992) brindaron imágenes temporales de las pérdidas de rendimiento comparativas causadas por malezas en diferentes regiones geográficas y cultivos dentro de estas regiones después de la implementación de tácticas de control de malezas. Este manuscrito es un segundo reporte del comité actual de pérdidas por malezas de WSSA sobre pérdidas en rendimiento causadas por malezas, específicamente en soja. Los estimados de pérdida en rendimiento fueron determinados a partir de observaciones comparativas de rendimientos de soja entre testigos con malezas y parcelas con más de 95% de control en estudios realizados desde 2007 a 2013. Investigadores de cada estado de Estados Unidos y de cada provincia de Canada brindaron al menos tres y hasta 10 comparaciones individuales para cada año, las cuales fueron promediadas dentro de cada año, y luego promediadas para los siete años. Estos valores de porcentaje de rendimiento fueron usados para determinar la pérdida total en soja en t ha−1 y bu acre−1 con base en el promedio de rendimiento de soja para cada estado o provincia y el precio de grano para cada año como lo resumen USDA-NASS (2014) y Statistics Canada (2015). Promediando los años de 2007 a 2013, la interferencia de malezas en soja causó un 52,1% de pérdidas de rendimiento. Con base en los datos del censo de 2012 en Estados Unidos y Canada, se produjo soja en 30,798,512 y 1,679,203 hectáreas para una producción de 80 millones y 5 millones de toneladas, respectivamente. Usando una precio de la soja promedio para 2007 a 2013 de US $389.81 t−1 ($10,61 bu−1), el valor en puerta de finca se hubiera reducido en US $16.6 miles de millones en los Estados Unidos y $1.0 mil millones en Canada anualmente si no se hubieran empleado tácticas de manejo de malezas.
AbstractList Weeds are one of the most significant, and controllable, threats to crop production in North America. Monetary losses because of reduced soybean yield and decreased quality because of weed interference, as well as costs of controlling weeds, have a significant economic impact on net returns to producers. Previous Weed Science Society of America (WSSA) Weed Loss Committee reports, as chaired by Chandler (1984) and Bridges (1992), provided snapshots of the comparative crop yield losses because of weeds across geographic regions and crops within these regions after the implementation of weed control tactics. This manuscript is a second report from the current WSSA Weed Loss Committee on crop yield losses because of weeds, specifically in soybean. Yield loss estimates were determined from comparative observations of soybean yields between the weedy control and plots with greater than 95% weed control in studies conducted from 2007 to 2013. Researchers from each US state and Canadian province provided at least three and up to ten individual comparisons for each year, which were then averaged within a year, and then averaged over the seven years. These percent yield loss values were used to determine total soybean yield loss in t ha−1 and bu acre−1 based on average soybean yields for each state or province as well as current commodity prices for a given year as summarized by USDA-NASS (2014) and Statistics Canada (2015). Averaged across 2007 to 2013, weed interference in soybean caused a 52.1% yield loss. Based on 2012 census data in the US and Canada soybean was grown on 30,798,512 and 1,679,203 hectares with production of 80 million and 5 million tonnes, respectively. Using an average soybean price across 2007 to 2013 of US $389.81 t−1 ($10.61 bu−1), farm gate value would be reduced by US $16.2 billion in the US and $1.0 billion in Canada annually if no weed management tactics were employed. Las malezas son una de las amenazas más significativas y controlables para la producción agrícola en Norteamérica. Las pérdidas monetarias producto de la reducción en el rendimiento de la soja y la disminución en la calidad debido a la interferencia de malezas y al costo de controlar a estas, tiene un impacto económico significativo en la rentabilidad de los productores. Reportes previos del comité de pérdidas por malezas de la Sociedad Americana de la Ciencia de Malezas (WSSA), bajo la dirección de Chandler (1984) y Bridges (1992) brindaron imágenes temporales de las pérdidas de rendimiento comparativas causadas por malezas en diferentes regiones geográficas y cultivos dentro de estas regiones después de la implementación de tácticas de control de malezas. Este manuscrito es un segundo reporte del comité actual de pérdidas por malezas de WSSA sobre pérdidas en rendimiento causadas por malezas, específicamente en soja. Los estimados de pérdida en rendimiento fueron determinados a partir de observaciones comparativas de rendimientos de soja entre testigos con malezas y parcelas con más de 95% de control en estudios realizados desde 2007 a 2013. Investigadores de cada estado de Estados Unidos y de cada provincia de Canada brindaron al menos tres y hasta 10 comparaciones individuales para cada año, las cuales fueron promediadas dentro de cada año, y luego promediadas para los siete años. Estos valores de porcentaje de rendimiento fueron usados para determinar la pérdida total en soja en t ha−1 y bu acre−1 con base en el promedio de rendimiento de soja para cada estado o provincia y el precio de grano para cada año como lo resumen USDA-NASS (2014) y Statistics Canada (2015). Promediando los años de 2007 a 2013, la interferencia de malezas en soja causó un 52,1% de pérdidas de rendimiento. Con base en los datos del censo de 2012 en Estados Unidos y Canada, se produjo soja en 30,798,512 y 1,679,203 hectáreas para una producción de 80 millones y 5 millones de toneladas, respectivamente. Usando una precio de la soja promedio para 2007 a 2013 de US $389.81 t−1 ($10,61 bu−1), el valor en puerta de finca se hubiera reducido en US $16.6 miles de millones en los Estados Unidos y $1.0 mil millones en Canada anualmente si no se hubieran empleado tácticas de manejo de malezas.
Weeds are one of the most significant, and controllable, threats to crop production in North America. Monetary losses because of reduced soybean yield and decreased quality because of weed interference, as well as costs of controlling weeds, have a significant economic impact on net returns to producers. Previous Weed Science Society of America (WSSA) Weed Loss Committee reports, as chaired by Chandler (1984) and Bridges (1992), provided snapshots of the comparative crop yield losses because of weeds across geographic regions and crops within these regions after the implementation of weed control tactics. This manuscript is a second report from the current WSSA Weed Loss Committee on crop yield losses because of weeds, specifically in soybean. Yield loss estimates were determined from comparative observations of soybean yields between the weedy control and plots with greater than 95% weed control in studies conducted from 2007 to 2013. Researchers from each US state and Canadian province provided at least three and up to ten individual comparisons for each year, which were then averaged within a year, and then averaged over the seven years. These percent yield loss values were used to determine total soybean yield loss in t ha −1 and bu acre −1 based on average soybean yields for each state or province as well as current commodity prices for a given year as summarized by USDA-NASS (2014) and Statistics Canada (2015). Averaged across 2007 to 2013, weed interference in soybean caused a 52.1% yield loss. Based on 2012 census data in the US and Canada soybean was grown on 30,798,512 and 1,679,203 hectares with production of 80 million and 5 million tonnes, respectively. Using an average soybean price across 2007 to 2013 of US $389.81 t −1 ($10.61 bu −1 ), farm gate value would be reduced by US $16.2 billion in the US and $1.0 billion in Canada annually if no weed management tactics were employed. Las malezas son una de las amenazas más significativas y controlables para la producción agrícola en Norteamérica. Las pérdidas monetarias producto de la reducción en el rendimiento de la soja y la disminución en la calidad debido a la interferencia de malezas y al costo de controlar a estas, tiene un impacto económico significativo en la rentabilidad de los productores. Reportes previos del comité de pérdidas por malezas de la Sociedad Americana de la Ciencia de Malezas (WSSA), bajo la dirección de Chandler (1984) y Bridges (1992) brindaron imágenes temporales de las pérdidas de rendimiento comparativas causadas por malezas en diferentes regiones geográficas y cultivos dentro de estas regiones después de la implementación de tácticas de control de malezas. Este manuscrito es un segundo reporte del comité actual de pérdidas por malezas de WSSA sobre pérdidas en rendimiento causadas por malezas, específicamente en soja. Los estimados de pérdida en rendimiento fueron determinados a partir de observaciones comparativas de rendimientos de soja entre testigos con malezas y parcelas con más de 95% de control en estudios realizados desde 2007 a 2013. Investigadores de cada estado de Estados Unidos y de cada provincia de Canada brindaron al menos tres y hasta 10 comparaciones individuales para cada año, las cuales fueron promediadas dentro de cada año, y luego promediadas para los siete años. Estos valores de porcentaje de rendimiento fueron usados para determinar la pérdida total en soja en t ha −1 y bu acre −1 con base en el promedio de rendimiento de soja para cada estado o provincia y el precio de grano para cada año como lo resumen USDA-NASS (2014) y Statistics Canada (2015). Promediando los años de 2007 a 2013, la interferencia de malezas en soja causó un 52,1% de pérdidas de rendimiento. Con base en los datos del censo de 2012 en Estados Unidos y Canada, se produjo soja en 30,798,512 y 1,679,203 hectáreas para una producción de 80 millones y 5 millones de toneladas, respectivamente. Usando una precio de la soja promedio para 2007 a 2013 de US $389.81 t −1 ($10,61 bu −1 ), el valor en puerta de finca se hubiera reducido en US $16.6 miles de millones en los Estados Unidos y $1.0 mil millones en Canada anualmente si no se hubieran empleado tácticas de manejo de malezas.
Weeds are one of the most significant, and controllable, threats to crop production in North America. Monetary losses because of reduced soybean yield and decreased quality because of weed interference, as well as costs of controlling weeds, have a significant economic impact on net returns to producers. Previous Weed Science Society of America (WSSA) Weed Loss Committee reports, as chaired by Chandler (1984) and Bridges (1992), provided snapshots of the comparative crop yield losses because of weeds across geographic regions and crops within these regions after the implementation of weed control tactics. This manuscript is a second report from the current WSSA Weed Loss Committee on crop yield losses because of weeds, specifically in soybean. Yield loss estimates were determined from comparative observations of soybean yields between the weedy control and plots with greater than 95% weed control in studies conducted from 2007 to 2013. Researchers from each US state and Canadian province provided at least three and up to ten individual comparisons for each year, which were then averaged within a year, and then averaged over the seven years. These percent yield loss values were used to determine total soybean yield loss in t ha−1 and bu acre−1 based on average soybean yields for each state or province as well as current commodity prices for a given year as summarized by USDA-NASS (2014) and Statistics Canada (2015). Averaged across 2007 to 2013, weed interference in soybean caused a 52.1% yield loss. Based on 2012 census data in the US and Canada soybean was grown on 30,798,512 and 1,679,203 hectares with production of 80 million and 5 million tonnes, respectively. Using an average soybean price across 2007 to 2013 of US $389.81 t−1 ($10.61 bu−1), farm gate value would be reduced by US $16.2 billion in the US and $1.0 billion in Canada annually if no weed management tactics were employed. Nomenclature: Soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr Las malezas son una de las amenazas más significativas y controlables para la producción agrícola en Norteamérica. Las pérdidas monetarias producto de la reducción en el rendimiento de la soja y la disminución en la calidad debido a la interferencia de malezas y al costo de controlar a estas, tiene un impacto económico significativo en la rentabilidad de los productores. Reportes previos del comité de pérdidas por malezas de la Sociedad Americana de la Ciencia de Malezas (WSSA), bajo la dirección de Chandler (1984) y Bridges (1992) brindaron imágenes temporales de las pérdidas de rendimiento comparativas causadas por malezas en diferentes regiones geográficas y cultivos dentro de estas regiones después de la implementación de tácticas de control de malezas. Este manuscrito es un segundo reporte del comité actual de pérdidas por malezas de WSSA sobre pérdidas en rendimiento causadas por malezas, específicamente en soja. Los estimados de pérdida en rendimiento fueron determinados a partir de observaciones comparativas de rendimientos de soja entre testigos con malezas y parcelas con más de 95% de control en estudios realizados desde 2007 a 2013. Investigadores de cada estado de Estados Unidos y de cada provincia de Canada brindaron al menos tres y hasta 10 comparaciones individuales para cada año, las cuales fueron promediadas dentro de cada año, y luego promediadas para los siete años. Estos valores de porcentaje de rendimiento fueron usados para determinar la pérdida total en soja en t ha−1 y bu acre−1 con base en el promedio de rendimiento de soja para cada estado o provincia y el precio de grano para cada año como lo resumen USDA-NASS (2014) y Statistics Canada (2015). Promediando los años de 2007 a 2013, la interferencia de malezas en soja causó un 52,1% de pérdidas de rendimiento. Con base en los datos del censo de 2012 en Estados Unidos y Canada, se produjo soja en 30,798,512 y 1,679,203 hectáreas para una producción de 80 millones y 5 millones de toneladas, respectivamente. Usando una precio de la soja promedio para 2007 a 2013 de US $389.81 t−1 ($10,61 bu−1), el valor en puerta de finca se hubiera reducido en US $16.6 miles de millones en los Estados Unidos y $1.0 mil millones en Canada anualmente si no se hubieran empleado tácticas de manejo de malezas.
Weeds are one of the most significant, and controllable, threats to crop production in North America. Monetary losses because of reduced soybean yield and decreased quality because of weed interference, as well as costs of controlling weeds, have a significant economic impact on net returns to producers. Previous Weed Science Society of America (WSSA) Weed Loss Committee reports, as chaired by Chandler (1984) and Bridges (1992), provided snapshots of the comparative crop yield losses because of weeds across geographic regions and crops within these regions after the implementation of weed control tactics. This manuscript is a second report from the current WSSA Weed Loss Committee on crop yield losses because of weeds, specifically in soybean. Yield loss estimates were determined from comparative observations of soybean yields between the weedy control and plots with greater than 95% weed control in studies conducted from 2007 to 2013. Researchers from each US state and Canadian province provided at least three and up to ten individual comparisons for each year, which were then averaged within a year, and then averaged over the seven years. These percent yield loss values were used to determine total soybean yield loss in t ha-1 and bu acre-1 based on average soybean yields for each state or province as well as current commodity prices for a given year as summarized by USDA-NASS (2014) and Statistics Canada (2015). Averaged across 2007 to 2013, weed interference in soybean caused a 52.1% yield loss. Based on 2012 census data in the US and Canada soybean was grown on 30,798,512 and 1,679,203 hectares with production of 80 million and 5 million tonnes, respectively. Using an average soybean price across 2007 to 2013 of US $389.81 t-1 ($10.61 bu-1), farm gate value would be reduced by US $16.2 billion in the US and $1.0 billion in Canada annually if no weed management tactics were employed.
Weeds are one of the most significant, and controllable, threats to crop production in North America. Monetary losses because of reduced soybean yield and decreased quality because of weed interference, as well as costs of controlling weeds, have a significant economic impact on net returns to producers. Previous Weed Science Society of America (WSSA) Weed Loss Committee reports, as chaired by Chandler (1984) and Bridges (1992), provided snapshots of the comparative crop yield losses because of weeds across geographic regions and crops within these regions after the implementation of weed control tactics. This manuscript is a second report from the current WSSA Weed Loss Committee on crop yield losses because of weeds, specifically in soybean. Yield loss estimates were determined from comparative observations of soybean yields between the weedy control and plots with greater than 95% weed control in studies conducted from 2007 to 2013. Researchers from each US state and Canadian province provided at least three and up to ten individual comparisons for each year, which were then averaged within a year, and then averaged over the seven years. These percent yield loss values were used to determine total soybean yield loss in t ha⁻¹ and bu acre⁻¹ based on average soybean yields for each state or province as well as current commodity prices for a given year as summarized by USDA-NASS (2014) and Statistics Canada (2015). Averaged across 2007 to 2013, weed interference in soybean caused a 52.1% yield loss. Based on 2012 census data in the US and Canada soybean was grown on 30,798,512 and 1,679,203 hectares with production of 80 million and 5 million tonnes, respectively. Using an average soybean price across 2007 to 2013 of US $389.81 t⁻¹ ($10.61 bu⁻¹), farm gate value would be reduced by US $16.2 billion in the US and $1.0 billion in Canada annually if no weed management tactics were employed. Nomenclature: Soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr
Author Sikkema, Peter H.
Everman, Wesley J.
Soltani, Nader
VanGessel, Mark J.
Dille, J. Anita
Burke, Ian C.
Davis, Vince M.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Nader
  surname: Soltani
  fullname: Soltani, Nader
  organization: Adjunct Professor and Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada
– sequence: 2
  givenname: J. Anita
  surname: Dille
  fullname: Dille, J. Anita
  organization: Professor, Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ian C.
  surname: Burke
  fullname: Burke, Ian C.
  organization: Associate Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Wesley J.
  surname: Everman
  fullname: Everman, Wesley J.
  organization: Assistant Professor, Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Mark J.
  surname: VanGessel
  fullname: VanGessel, Mark J.
  organization: Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Delaware, Georgetown, DE
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Vince M.
  surname: Davis
  fullname: Davis, Vince M.
  organization: Tech Service Representative, BASF, Madison, WI
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Peter H.
  surname: Sikkema
  fullname: Sikkema, Peter H.
  organization: Adjunct Professor and Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada
BookMark eNp90U1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxbsQ8CLC1kmyH9mjiJ8UFVTUU0h3ZzFlm9QkVfz3plQURDzl8uRl5p0tsm6dRUJ2GYwYsOroHeOIAytHfI0MWFFAxqsc1skAZA0ZiOppk2yFMIVkOIcBubpFH-bYRPOGgTpLb11EG43u6Z37mKC29Nlg39KxCyGJzrsZfURsAzWWXjsfX-jxDL1p9DbZ6HQfcOfrHZKHs9P7k4tsfHN-eXI8ziZCiphxjiC6VmoArPO6koIDFF09kbosgLEugVyjbKTkHUCTV4y3VdnlopKt4EIMycEqd-7d6wJDVDMTGux7bdEtguIgcxAyz3mi-7_o1C28TdMpJiWURS3KZSCsVOPTkh471Zioo3E2em16xUAty1WpXLUsVy2DD399mXsz0_7jb7y3wtMQnf-WvCzKKp3oZ6GJcemc_0V9AkiskYE
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_51694_AdvWeedSci_2022_40_seventy_five011
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2019_18
crossref_primary_10_1017_wsc_2023_70
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2019_21
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy12112846
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy11101909
crossref_primary_10_36495_2312_0614_2022_1_3_7
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2022_23
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijpb15020026
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2020_118
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2021_794090
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2022_36
crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture11030193
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoderma_2020_114626
crossref_primary_10_14295_bjs_v2i4_274
crossref_primary_10_1017_wsc_2024_47
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2018_62
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2020_12
crossref_primary_10_51694_AdvWeedSci_2022_40_amarathus002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_154764
crossref_primary_10_32604_phyton_2024_052241
crossref_primary_10_1017_wsc_2019_25
crossref_primary_10_5897_AJAR2024_16683
crossref_primary_10_1002_plr2_20401
crossref_primary_10_4236_ajps_2021_127074
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_024_06830_4
crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture14050659
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2020_22
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2021_78
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2017_116
crossref_primary_10_1139_cjps_2024_0017
crossref_primary_10_30612_agrarian_v15i55_15715
crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture13030559
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy13092345
crossref_primary_10_1080_09670874_2024_2347861
crossref_primary_10_1017_wsc_2020_16
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2020_00789
crossref_primary_10_1002_fes3_161
crossref_primary_10_51694_AdvWeedSci_2022_40_00003
crossref_primary_10_1093_aesa_saab002
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2018_88
crossref_primary_10_3390_plants11233404
crossref_primary_10_3389_fagro_2024_1401865
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4002424
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2023_20
crossref_primary_10_1139_cjps_2020_0310
crossref_primary_10_4236_ajps_2019_1012153
crossref_primary_10_1139_cjps_2018_0049
crossref_primary_10_3390_s23063241
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40333_024_0028_9
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0960258518000181
crossref_primary_10_1051_e3sconf_202346202018
crossref_primary_10_5937_actaherb2102079P
crossref_primary_10_4236_ajps_2020_119106
crossref_primary_10_1139_cjps_2019_0338
crossref_primary_10_4236_ajps_2020_1112141
crossref_primary_10_4236_ajps_2020_119107
crossref_primary_10_1017_wsc_2021_81
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2021_99
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy9100615
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aiia_2022_11_001
crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj2018_07_0463
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_75996_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2018_08_156
crossref_primary_10_1111_wre_12618
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2023_1193666
crossref_primary_10_1139_cjps_2019_0069
crossref_primary_10_3390_plants13141996
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atech_2023_100249
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2021_1
crossref_primary_10_2478_jofnem_2024_0017
crossref_primary_10_3389_fgene_2022_905824
crossref_primary_10_4236_ajps_2021_124036
crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture13030725
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2022_72
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2022_76
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2024_109492
crossref_primary_10_3390_su12093872
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13165_025_00485_w
crossref_primary_10_1590_1808_1657000222021
crossref_primary_10_2134_cs2018_51_0504
crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture11050461
crossref_primary_10_3390_plants11212989
crossref_primary_10_1093_aob_mcae191
crossref_primary_10_1590_1413_7054201943000319
crossref_primary_10_1002_agj2_20615
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2021_39
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2024_24
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2022_88
crossref_primary_10_4236_ajps_2020_1111122
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1742170523000522
crossref_primary_10_4236_ajps_2020_113034
crossref_primary_10_51694_AdvWeedSci_2023_41_00009
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2024_1
crossref_primary_10_1002_agg2_20245
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2018_37
crossref_primary_10_1002_leg3_66
crossref_primary_10_3390_rs14071618
crossref_primary_10_1017_wsc_2023_59
crossref_primary_10_36495_2312_0614_2022_3_20_25
crossref_primary_10_1080_21645698_2024_2318876
Cites_doi 10.2135/cropsci2013.10.0665
10.1017/S0021859605005708
10.1017/S0890037X00028049
10.1614/WS-D-11-00206.1
10.1017/S0043174500054473
10.4141/P00-102
10.1614/WT-D-12-00109.1
10.1017/S0043174500032392
10.1016/0167-8809(83)90038-5
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Weed Science Society of America, 2017
Copyright Cambridge University Press Jan/Feb 2017
Copyright_xml – notice: Weed Science Society of America, 2017
– notice: Copyright Cambridge University Press Jan/Feb 2017
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7X2
7XB
8FE
8FH
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
ATCPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HCIFZ
LK8
M0K
M2O
M7P
MBDVC
PADUT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1017/wet.2016.2
DatabaseName CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Agricultural Science Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Research Library
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
Agricultural Science Database
Research Library
Biological Science Database
Research Library (Corporate)
Research Library China
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central Basic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Agricultural Science Database
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Research Library
Research Library China
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Agricultural Science Collection
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef

Agricultural Science Database
AGRICOLA
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
Statistics
EISSN 1550-2740
EndPage 154
ExternalDocumentID 4321144459
10_1017_wet_2016_2
26567550
Genre Feature
GeographicLocations United States--US
North America
Canada
United States
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
– name: North America
– name: Canada
– name: United States
GroupedDBID -JH
08R
09C
09E
0R~
123
29R
2AX
2~F
3V.
7X2
8FE
8FH
8G5
AAAZR
AABES
AABWE
AACFU
AAEED
AAGFV
AAHKG
AAKTX
AAPSS
AASVR
AAUKB
AAXTN
ABBHK
ABBZL
ABKMT
ABPLY
ABQTM
ABROB
ABTLG
ABUWG
ABZCX
ACCHT
ACGFS
ACPRK
ACQFJ
ACUIJ
ACUYZ
ACWGA
ACYZP
ADBBV
ADDNB
ADGEJ
ADHSS
ADKIL
ADOCW
ADOVH
ADOVT
ADOYD
ADULT
ADVJH
ADZLD
AEBAK
AEBPU
AEDJY
AEEJZ
AENCP
AENEX
AEPYG
AESBF
AEUPB
AEYYC
AFAZZ
AFFIJ
AFKQG
AFKRA
AFLVW
AFNWH
AFRAH
AFRIC
AGABE
AGJUD
AGOOT
AGUYK
AHQXX
AICQM
AIGNW
AIHIV
AIOIP
AIRJO
AJCYY
AJPFC
AKPMI
AKZCZ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ANHSF
AQJOH
ARZZG
AS~
ATCPS
ATUCA
AUXHV
AYIQA
AZQEC
BBLKV
BBNVY
BCGOX
BENPR
BESQT
BHPHI
BJBOZ
BLZWO
BMAJL
BPHCQ
CAG
CBGCD
CBIIA
CCPQU
CCUQV
CFAFE
CFBFF
CGQII
CJCSC
COF
CS3
CWIXF
DATOO
DC7
DFEDG
DOHLZ
DOOOF
DWIUU
DWQXO
EBS
EGQIC
EJD
EQZMY
GNUQQ
GTFYD
GUQSH
HCIFZ
HGD
HTVGU
HZ~
IH6
IL9
IOEEP
IOO
IS6
JAAYA
JBMMH
JBS
JENOY
JHFFW
JHPGK
JKQEH
JLS
JLXEF
JPM
JQKCU
JSODD
JST
KAFGG
KCGVB
KFECR
LHUNA
LK8
LW7
M0K
M2O
M7P
NEJ
NHB
NIKVX
NVHAQ
NZEOI
O9-
OVD
P2P
PADUT
PQ0
PQQKQ
PROAC
Q5J
RBO
RCA
ROL
S6U
SA0
SAAAG
SJN
T9M
TEORI
TN5
UT1
WFFJZ
WH7
Y6R
ZDLDU
ZJOSE
ZMEZD
ZYDXJ
~02
~EF
~KM
AAHBH
ABGDZ
ABJNI
ABVKB
ABVZP
ABXAU
ABXHF
ABXSQ
ACDLN
ACHIC
AEHGV
AEUYN
AFZFC
AHRGI
AHXOZ
AKMAY
AQVQM
CCQAD
CHEAL
H13
IPSME
PHGZM
PHGZT
AAYXX
ACAJB
CITATION
ECGQY
IPYYG
YR5
7XB
8FK
MBDVC
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-b383t-22e03fd8a00e9497832005f9b8a65011f22e4ae8c882f00c4712d76f4378d3233
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 0890-037X
1550-2740
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 19:21:31 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 10:46:04 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 03 08:12:34 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:55:01 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 03 22:31:37 EDT 2025
Fri Nov 24 06:23:36 EST 2023
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b383t-22e03fd8a00e9497832005f9b8a65011f22e4ae8c882f00c4712d76f4378d3233
Notes SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/839B31C6771865071E6956BAEFC0F076/S0890037X16000026a.pdf/div-class-title-perspectives-on-potential-soybean-yield-losses-from-weeds-in-north-america-div.pdf
PQID 1880659363
PQPubID 506325
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2084038442
proquest_journals_1880659363
crossref_citationtrail_10_1017_wet_2016_2
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2016_2
jstor_primary_26567550
bioone_primary_10_1017_wet_2016_2
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace New York, USA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York, USA
– name: Lawrence
PublicationTitle Weed technology
PublicationTitleAbbrev Weed Technol
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Weed Science Society of America
Publisher_xml – name: Cambridge University Press
– name: Weed Science Society of America
References Burnside (S0890037X16000026_ref4) 1969; 17
Vencill (S0890037X16000026_ref17) 2012
Cramer (S0890037X16000026_ref6) 1967; vol. 20
Oerke (S0890037X16000026_ref11) 1994
S0890037X16000026_ref1
Bridges (S0890037X16000026_ref2) 1992
Rincker (S0890037X16000026_ref12) 2014; 54
Swanton (S0890037X16000026_ref15) 1993; 7
S0890037X16000026_ref16
Werner (S0890037X16000026_ref20) 2014
S0890037X16000026_ref9
Burnside (S0890037X16000026_ref3) 1973; 21
S0890037X16000026_ref7
S0890037X16000026_ref18
S0890037X16000026_ref8
Smith (S0890037X16000026_ref13) 1984
Chandler (S0890037X16000026_ref5) 1984
S0890037X16000026_ref14
Walker (S0890037X16000026_ref19) 1987; 8
S0890037X16000026_ref10
References_xml – ident: S0890037X16000026_ref16
– start-page: 808
  year: 1994
  ident: S0890037X16000026_ref11
  article-title: Crop Production and Crop Protection: Estimated Losses in Major Food and Cash Crops
  publication-title: Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V
– volume-title: Crop losses due to weeds in Canada and the United States
  year: 1984
  ident: S0890037X16000026_ref5
– volume: 54
  start-page: 1419
  year: 2014
  ident: S0890037X16000026_ref12
  article-title: Genetic improvements of U.S. soybean in maturity groups II, III, and IV
  publication-title: Crop Sci
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci2013.10.0665
– start-page: 403
  volume-title: Crop losses due to weeds in Canada and the United States
  year: 1992
  ident: S0890037X16000026_ref2
– ident: S0890037X16000026_ref14
– ident: S0890037X16000026_ref10
  doi: 10.1017/S0021859605005708
– volume: 7
  start-page: 537
  year: 1993
  ident: S0890037X16000026_ref15
  article-title: Crop losses due to weeds in Canada
  publication-title: Weed Technol
  doi: 10.1017/S0890037X00028049
– start-page: 2
  year: 2012
  ident: S0890037X16000026_ref17
  article-title: Herbicide resistance: toward an understanding of resistance development and the impact of herbicide-resistant crops
  publication-title: Weed Sci (Special Issue)
  doi: 10.1614/WS-D-11-00206.1
– volume: 17
  start-page: 438
  year: 1969
  ident: S0890037X16000026_ref4
  article-title: Effect of weeds on harvesting efficiency in corn, sorghum, and soybeans
  publication-title: Weed Sci
  doi: 10.1017/S0043174500054473
– volume: 8
  start-page: 665
  year: 1987
  ident: S0890037X16000026_ref19
  article-title: Losses in yield due to pests in tropical crops and their value in policy decision-making
  publication-title: Insect Sci Appl
– ident: S0890037X16000026_ref8
  doi: 10.4141/P00-102
– volume: vol. 20
  start-page: 524
  volume-title: Plant Protection and World Crop Production
  year: 1967
  ident: S0890037X16000026_ref6
– start-page: 213
  volume-title: Plant Diseases: Infection, Damage and Loss
  year: 1984
  ident: S0890037X16000026_ref13
– start-page: 6
  year: 2014
  ident: S0890037X16000026_ref20
  article-title: Management of eastern black nightshade in agronomic crops: an integrated approach
  publication-title: Pennsylvania: Penn State Extension. (Agronomy Facts 58)
– ident: S0890037X16000026_ref9
  doi: 10.1614/WT-D-12-00109.1
– volume: 21
  start-page: 520
  year: 1973
  ident: S0890037X16000026_ref3
  article-title: Influence of weeds on soybean harvesting losses with a combine
  publication-title: Weed Sci
  doi: 10.1017/S0043174500032392
– ident: S0890037X16000026_ref1
– ident: S0890037X16000026_ref18
  doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(83)90038-5
– ident: S0890037X16000026_ref7
SSID ssj0016220
Score 2.443358
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Weeds are one of the most significant, and controllable, threats to crop production in North America. Monetary losses because of reduced soybean yield and...
SourceID proquest
crossref
jstor
bioone
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 148
SubjectTerms Agricultural production
Best management practices (BMP)
Canada
census data
commodity prices
costs and returns
crop losses
Crop production
Crop yield
crops
Economic impact
economic loss
EDUCATION/EXTENSION
farms
Glycine max
Herbicides
Soybeans
statistics
United States
USA
Weed control
weed management
Weeds
Title Perspectives on Potential Soybean Yield Losses from Weeds in North America
URI http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1017/wet.2016.2
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26567550
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1880659363
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2084038442
Volume 31
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LS8QwEA4-LnoQX4vri4hePETbJLbZk6i4iKgs6uJ6KkmbyIK0q62I_96ZNruLKF566TS0M-m8vskMIQfK8Ywb4ZhSUcakk4ppKSzjNhSZNDFc8HDy7V101ZfXg5OBT7iVvqxyrBNrRZ0VKebIj7FvWITj58Tp6I3h1ChEV_0IjVkyDypYQfA1f35517uf4AgRbxozqk7AAhEPxg1Kw_j402IpZRgdcTA-ZlgUuf1hm5ryxF8qurY73WWy5B1GetZIeIXM2HyVLJ69vPumGXaNXPemJyZLWuS0V1RYBASPPRRfxuqcPmOhGr0pEOKleKSEPoHZKukwpzVyQz1ys0763cvHiyvmZyQwA7FlxTi3gXCZ0kFgOzgtTmCayHWM0uB7haEDAqmtSsGTdkGQgi3iWRw5KWKVCS5Ei8zl8OkbhCoTCdHRoU4t4sRGOck1CMsok0LgKNpkr2FTMmoaYSRNhVicACsTZGXC2-RwzMEk9U3GcdbF65-0-xPa_1Zs1YKYkHDwQGOIq9pkeyyZxP93ZTLdJfC2k9vwxyAMonNbfJSwLgS1QknJN_9fYosscDTidcJlm8xV7x92B1yQyuz6ffYNhlHYrw
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR1NTxQx9IUsB_RgVCSugtYABw-VmbbOdA_EoEIWWDYbhbieajvTEhIyg8wSwp_yN_refCwxGG5c5jKvzczr6_v-ANjQQeTCycC1TnKugtLcKum58LHMlUvxQcXJR-NkeKIOph-nC_Cnq4WhtMqOJ9aMOi8z8pFvUd-whMbPyU8XvzlNjaLoajdCoyGLQ39zjSZbtb3_Fc93U4i93eMvQ95OFeAOrbEZF8JHMuTaRpEf0Hw1SY6VMHDaorYSxwEBlPU6Q90zRFGG3FvkaRKUTHUuBTlAkeUvKommTA8WP--OJ9_mcYtENI0g9SDikUynXUPUON269pS6GScfBAo7d1aWhf9HFjbpkHdEQi3n9p7Ck1ZBZTsNRT2DBV88h8c7p5dtkw6_DAeT2wrNipUFm5QzSjrCZd_LG-dtwX5SYhwblRRSZlTCwn6gmKzYWcHqSBFrI0Uv4ORBsLcCvQJ__SUw7RIpBza2mae4tNNBCYvE4bTL0FCVfXjXoMlcNI03TJORlhpEpSFUGtGH9x0GTdY2NafZGuf_hV2fw96340p9EHMQgRpvinZcH1a7kzHtPa_MLVXi185f4w2lsIstfHlV4b5oREutlHh1_xZvYWl4fDQyo_3x4Wt4JEiBqJ09q9CbXV75NVR_Zu5NS3MMfj00mf8FuHETGQ
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3LbtQwcFRtJQQHxKtiSwEjyoGD2cR2E--hQoV21edqBVRsT66d2GilKinNVlV_rV_HTB5bIVBvveSSsZWMx_N-AKzrIHLhZOBaJzlXQWlulfRc-FjmyqX4oOLko3Gye6z2pxvTJbjpamEorbLjiTWjzsuMfOQD6huW0Pg5OQhtWsRke_T5_DenCVIUae3GaTQkcuCvr9B8qzb3tvGsPwgx2vnxdZe3Ewa4Q8tszoXwkQy5tlHkhzRrTZKTJQydtqi5xHFAAGW9zlAPDVGUIScXeZoEJVOdS0HOUGT_yylaRVEPlr_sjCffFjGMRDRNIfUw4pFMp11z1DgdXHlK44yTTwIFn5uVZeH_kotNauQ_4qGWeaMn8LhVVtlWQ11PYckXz-DR1q-LtmGHfw77k9tqzYqVBZuUc0pAwmXfy2vnbcFOKEmOHZYUXmZUzsJ-osis2KxgddSItVGjF3B8L9hbgV6Bv_4SmHaJlEMb28xTjNrpoIRFQnHaZWi0yj68a9BkzpsmHKbJTksNotIQKo3ow8cOgyZrG5zTnI2z_8K-X8DeteNKfRALEIHab4o2XR_WupMx7Z2vzC2F4tcuXuNtpRCMLXx5WeG-aFBLrZRYvXuLt_AAydsc7o0PXsFDQbpE7fdZg9784tK_Rk1o7t60JMfg9L6p_A-XFxdO
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perspectives+on+Potential+Soybean+Yield+Losses+from+Weeds+in+North+America&rft.jtitle=Weed+technology&rft.au=Soltani%2C+Nader&rft.au=Dille%2C+J.+Anita&rft.au=Burke%2C+Ian+C.&rft.au=Everman%2C+Wesley+J.&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.pub=Weed+Science+Society+of+America&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=148&rft.epage=154&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017%2Fwet.2016.2&rft.externalDocID=26567550
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0890-037X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0890-037X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0890-037X&client=summon