Eye Preference for Emotional Stimuli in Sichuan Snub-Nosed Monkeys
This study presents the first evidence of effects of applying both positive and negative stimuli simultaneously on visual laterality in Old World monkeys. Thirteen captive individuals of Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) were chosen as focal subjects in the monocular box task. In...
Saved in:
| Published in | Folia primatologica Vol. 91; no. 6; pp. 630 - 642 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
The Netherlands
Brill
01.11.2020
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0015-5713 1421-9980 1421-9980 |
| DOI | 10.1159/000509442 |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | This study presents the first evidence of effects of applying both positive and negative stimuli simultaneously on visual laterality in Old World monkeys. Thirteen captive individuals of Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) were chosen as focal subjects in the monocular box task. In total, 4 emotional categories (the preferred, the novel, the neutral, and the fearful) of visual stimuli were applied, and eye preference was recorded when individuals looked at each stimulus through an observation hole in the box. We found evidence of visual laterality at the individual level, but not at the group level for each stimulus. For the preferred stimulus, 9 individuals showed significant right-eye preference while 4 individuals showed significant left-eye preference. For the other 3 stimuli, 7 individuals displayed significant right-eye preference while 6 individuals displayed significant left-eye preference. Totally, 11 of 13 individuals showed consistency in the visual laterality direction (7 right-eye preference and 4 left-eye preference) across the 4 stimuli. The remaining 2 individuals displayed right-eye preference for the preferred stimulus while they showed left-eye preference for the other 3 stimuli. There was no significant difference among various stimuli regarding the direction of visual laterality. However, there was a significant difference in the strength of visual laterality among various stimulus categories. The strength of visual laterality for the preferred stimulus was significantly lower than that for the other 3 stimuli. The strength of visual laterality for the fearful stimulus was significantly higher than that for the novel stimulus and the neutral stimulus. Furthermore, the looking duration for the preferred stimulus was significantly higher than that for the other 3 stimuli. The looking duration for the novel stimulus was significantly higher than that for the neutral stimulus and the fearful stimulus. The looking duration for the neutral stimulus was significantly higher than that for the fearful stimulus. Our findings indicate emotional valence of stimuli significantly influence eye looking duration and the strength of visual laterality but not for the direction of visual laterality in this species. Taken together, emotional valence of stimuli plays an important role in the eye use of R. roxellana. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | This study presents the first evidence of effects of applying both positive and negative stimuli simultaneously on visual laterality in Old World monkeys. Thirteen captive individuals of Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) were chosen as focal subjects in the monocular box task. In total, 4 emotional categories (the preferred, the novel, the neutral, and the fearful) of visual stimuli were applied, and eye preference was recorded when individuals looked at each stimulus through an observation hole in the box. We found evidence of visual laterality at the individual level, but not at the group level for each stimulus. For the preferred stimulus, 9 individuals showed significant right-eye preference while 4 individuals showed significant left-eye preference. For the other 3 stimuli, 7 individuals displayed significant right-eye preference while 6 individuals displayed significant left-eye preference. Totally, 11 of 13 individuals showed consistency in the visual laterality direction (7 right-eye preference and 4 left-eye preference) across the 4 stimuli. The remaining 2 individuals displayed right-eye preference for the preferred stimulus while they showed left-eye preference for the other 3 stimuli. There was no significant difference among various stimuli regarding the direction of visual laterality. However, there was a significant difference in the strength of visual laterality among various stimulus categories. The strength of visual laterality for the preferred stimulus was significantly lower than that for the other 3 stimuli. The strength of visual laterality for the fearful stimulus was significantly higher than that for the novel stimulus and the neutral stimulus. Furthermore, the looking duration for the preferred stimulus was significantly higher than that for the other 3 stimuli. The looking duration for the novel stimulus was significantly higher than that for the neutral stimulus and the fearful stimulus. The looking duration for the neutral stimulus was significantly higher than that for the fearful stimulus. Our findings indicate emotional valence of stimuli significantly influence eye looking duration and the strength of visual laterality but not for the direction of visual laterality in this species. Taken together, emotional valence of stimuli plays an important role in the eye use of R. roxellana.This study presents the first evidence of effects of applying both positive and negative stimuli simultaneously on visual laterality in Old World monkeys. Thirteen captive individuals of Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) were chosen as focal subjects in the monocular box task. In total, 4 emotional categories (the preferred, the novel, the neutral, and the fearful) of visual stimuli were applied, and eye preference was recorded when individuals looked at each stimulus through an observation hole in the box. We found evidence of visual laterality at the individual level, but not at the group level for each stimulus. For the preferred stimulus, 9 individuals showed significant right-eye preference while 4 individuals showed significant left-eye preference. For the other 3 stimuli, 7 individuals displayed significant right-eye preference while 6 individuals displayed significant left-eye preference. Totally, 11 of 13 individuals showed consistency in the visual laterality direction (7 right-eye preference and 4 left-eye preference) across the 4 stimuli. The remaining 2 individuals displayed right-eye preference for the preferred stimulus while they showed left-eye preference for the other 3 stimuli. There was no significant difference among various stimuli regarding the direction of visual laterality. However, there was a significant difference in the strength of visual laterality among various stimulus categories. The strength of visual laterality for the preferred stimulus was significantly lower than that for the other 3 stimuli. The strength of visual laterality for the fearful stimulus was significantly higher than that for the novel stimulus and the neutral stimulus. Furthermore, the looking duration for the preferred stimulus was significantly higher than that for the other 3 stimuli. The looking duration for the novel stimulus was significantly higher than that for the neutral stimulus and the fearful stimulus. The looking duration for the neutral stimulus was significantly higher than that for the fearful stimulus. Our findings indicate emotional valence of stimuli significantly influence eye looking duration and the strength of visual laterality but not for the direction of visual laterality in this species. Taken together, emotional valence of stimuli plays an important role in the eye use of R. roxellana. This study presents the first evidence of effects of applying both positive and negative stimuli simultaneously on visual laterality in Old World monkeys. Thirteen captive individuals of Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) were chosen as focal subjects in the monocular box task. In total, 4 emotional categories (the preferred, the novel, the neutral, and the fearful) of visual stimuli were applied, and eye preference was recorded when individuals looked at each stimulus through an observation hole in the box. We found evidence of visual laterality at the individual level, but not at the group level for each stimulus. For the preferred stimulus, 9 individuals showed significant right-eye preference while 4 individuals showed significant left-eye preference. For the other 3 stimuli, 7 individuals displayed significant right-eye preference while 6 individuals displayed significant left-eye preference. Totally, 11 of 13 individuals showed consistency in the visual laterality direction (7 right-eye preference and 4 left-eye preference) across the 4 stimuli. The remaining 2 individuals displayed right-eye preference for the preferred stimulus while they showed left-eye preference for the other 3 stimuli. There was no significant difference among various stimuli regarding the direction of visual laterality. However, there was a significant difference in the strength of visual laterality among various stimulus categories. The strength of visual laterality for the preferred stimulus was significantly lower than that for the other 3 stimuli. The strength of visual laterality for the fearful stimulus was significantly higher than that for the novel stimulus and the neutral stimulus. Furthermore, the looking duration for the preferred stimulus was significantly higher than that for the other 3 stimuli. The looking duration for the novel stimulus was significantly higher than that for the neutral stimulus and the fearful stimulus. The looking duration for the neutral stimulus was significantly higher than that for the fearful stimulus. Our findings indicate emotional valence of stimuli significantly influence eye looking duration and the strength of visual laterality but not for the direction of visual laterality in this species. Taken together, emotional valence of stimuli plays an important role in the eye use of R. roxellana. This study presents the first evidence of effects of applying both positive and negative stimuli simultaneously on visual laterality in Old World monkeys. Thirteen captive individuals of Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys ( Rhinopithecus roxellana ) were chosen as focal subjects in the monocular box task. In total, 4 emotional categories (the preferred, the novel, the neutral, and the fearful) of visual stimuli were applied, and eye preference was recorded when individuals looked at each stimulus through an observation hole in the box. We found evidence of visual laterality at the individual level, but not at the group level for each stimulus. For the preferred stimulus, 9 individuals showed significant right-eye preference while 4 individuals showed significant left-eye preference. For the other 3 stimuli, 7 individuals displayed significant right-eye preference while 6 individuals displayed significant left-eye preference. Totally, 11 of 13 individuals showed consistency in the visual laterality direction (7 right-eye preference and 4 left-eye preference) across the 4 stimuli. The remaining 2 individuals displayed right-eye preference for the preferred stimulus while they showed left-eye preference for the other 3 stimuli. There was no significant difference among various stimuli regarding the direction of visual laterality. However, there was a significant difference in the strength of visual laterality among various stimulus categories. The strength of visual laterality for the preferred stimulus was significantly lower than that for the other 3 stimuli. The strength of visual laterality for the fearful stimulus was significantly higher than that for the novel stimulus and the neutral stimulus. Furthermore, the looking duration for the preferred stimulus was significantly higher than that for the other 3 stimuli. The looking duration for the novel stimulus was significantly higher than that for the neutral stimulus and the fearful stimulus. The looking duration for the neutral stimulus was significantly higher than that for the fearful stimulus. Our findings indicate emotional valence of stimuli significantly influence eye looking duration and the strength of visual laterality but not for the direction of visual laterality in this species. Taken together, emotional valence of stimuli plays an important role in the eye use of R. roxellana . |
| Author | Wang, Yuan Zhao, Dapeng Li, Baoguo |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Dapeng surname: Zhao fullname: Zhao, Dapeng – sequence: 2 givenname: Yuan surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Yuan – sequence: 3 givenname: Baoguo surname: Li fullname: Li, Baoguo |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937622$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNptkbtPwzAQxi1URB8wsCMUiQEYQv1InHqEqgWkAhWF2XIcB1ySuNjJ0P8eV2k7oE6n0_e7x3fXB53KVAqAcwTvEIrZEEIYQxZF-Aj0UIRRyNgIdkAPQhSHcYJIF_SdW25SSpMT0CWYkYRi3AMPk7UK5lblyqpKqiA3NpiUptamEkWwqHXZFDrQVbDQ8rsRPlZNGr4ap7LgxVQ_au1OwXEuCqfOtnEAPqeTj_FTOHt7fB7fz8KUUFqHfj8yyiXGOMtyJaGQMaMJEz6JFaVRxkiaRIgICFNBhPQiZTBhOGOYCETJANy0fVfW_DbK1bzUTqqiEJUyjeN4M2CERph49HKLNmmpMr6yuhR2zXe-PTBsAWmNc94-l7oWG9e1FbrgCPLNZfn-sr7i9l_Frukh9qJlf4T9UnZP7uWrg_J0_t4SfJXlnrpuqdTqouBL01j_Endg3B8UJ5Zy |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2024_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2022_104830 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00429_021_02331_7 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Karger, Basel, 2020 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Karger, Basel, 2020 – notice: 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel – notice: 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1159/000509442 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Zoology |
| EISSN | 1421-9980 |
| EndPage | 642 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 32937622 10_1159_000509442 509442 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | -DZ -~X .GJ 0R~ 0~5 0~B 29H 30W 326 3O. 3V. 4.4 53G 5GY 5RE 7X7 88E 88I 8AF 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FW 8UI AAKET AAYIC ABDBF ABIVO ABJNI ABPAZ ABUWG ABZSI ACGFS ACGOD ACHQM ACLGF ACNCT ACPRK ACPSR ADAGL ADBBV AEALX AENEX AEYAO AFKRA AFRAH AHMBA AIOBO AJDYO ALJKW ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFWP AOGPY AZPMC AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI BPHCQ BVXVI CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CYUIP DU5 DWQXO E0A EBS EJD F5P FB. FYUFA GNUQQ HCIFZ HMCUK HZ~ IY7 KOBVO KUZGX LK8 M1P M2M M2P M7P MVM N9A O1H O9- OHT PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PSYQQ RIG RKO RXVBD S0X TN5 UJ6 UKHRP UPT VQA X4A X7J XOL ZGI ZKB ~02 ADZLE AHYGR ALIPV AAAXD AAOGP AAYXX ABBTS ABWCG ABXFW ACUHS AEASU AHFRZ CITATION ACQXL AEUYN AFSIO CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PHGZT 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-b366t-94438fc222ddfec0ac59679adfe5e664d93b7413a00ba3ac967690792d923a163 |
| ISSN | 0015-5713 1421-9980 |
| IngestDate | Fri Sep 05 05:20:59 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:58:01 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:40:50 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:57:10 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 29 12:04:33 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 05 18:04:22 EDT 2024 Wed Dec 27 17:47:54 EST 2023 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 6 |
| Keywords | Strength of laterality Hemispheric asymmetries Emotional valence Old World monkeys |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel. |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b366t-94438fc222ddfec0ac59679adfe5e664d93b7413a00ba3ac967690792d923a163 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 32937622 |
| PQID | 2443881823 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 13 |
| ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1159_000509442 pubmed_primary_32937622 karger_primary_509442 crossref_citationtrail_10_1159_000509442 proquest_miscellaneous_2443881823 brill_journals_10_1159_000509442 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2020-11-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-11-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2020 text: 2020-11-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | The Netherlands |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: The Netherlands – name: Basel, Switzerland – name: Switzerland |
| PublicationTitle | Folia primatologica |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Folia Primatol |
| PublicationYear | 2020 |
| Publisher | Brill |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Brill |
| References | Fitch WT, Braccini SN (2013). Primate laterality and the biology and evolution of human handedness: a review and synthesis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1288: 70–85. Bibost AL, Brown C (2014). Laterality influences cognitive performance in rainbowfish Melanotaenia duboulayi. Animal Cognition 17: 1045–1051. Vallortigara G (2000). Comparative neuropsychology of the dual brain: a stroll through animals’ left and right perceptual worlds. Brain and Language 73: 189–219. Borod JC, Cicero BA, Obler LK, Welkowitz J, Erhan HM, Santschi, C, et al. (1998). Right hemisphere emotional perception: evidence across multiple channels. Neuropsychology 12: 446–458. Wässle H, Grünert U, Röhrenbeck J, Boycott BB (1990). Retinal ganglion cell density and cortical magnification factor in the primate. Vision Research 30: 1897–1911. Zhao DP, Tian XL, Liu XC, Chen ZY, Li BG (2016). Effect of target animacy on hand preference in Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana). Animal Cognition 19: 977–985. Wilson DA, Tomonaga M, Vick SJ (2016). Eye preference in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella). Primates 57: 433–440. Zhao DP, Gao X, Li BG, Watanabe K (2008d). First wild evidence of neonate nipple preference and maternal cradling laterality in Old World monkeys: a preliminary study from Rhinopithecus roxellana. Behavioural Processes 77: 364–368. Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G, Andrew RJ (2013). Divided Brains: The Biology and Behaviour of Brain Asymmetries. New York, Cambridge University Press. Zhao DP, Ji WH, Li BG, Watanabe K (2008b). Mate competition and reproductive correlates of female dispersal in a polygynous primate species (Rhinopithecus roxellana). Behavioural Processes 79: 165–170. Zhao DP, Wang Y, Han KJ, Zhang HB, Li BG (2015). Does target animacy influence manual laterality of monkeys? first answer from northern pig-tailed macaques (Macaca leonina). Animal Cognition 18: 931–936. Karenina KA, Giljov AN, Malashichev YB (2013). Eye as a key element of conspecific image eliciting lateralized response in fish. Animal Cognition 16: 287–300. Piddington T, Rogers LJ (2013). Strength of hand preference and dual task performance by common marmosets. Animal Cognition 16: 127–135. Wiper ML (2017). Evolutionary and mechanistic drivers of laterality: a review and new synthesis. Laterality 22: 740–770. Frasnelli E, Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ (2012). Left-right asymmetries of behaviour and nervous system in invertebrates. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 36: 1273–1291. Merigan WH, Katz LM (1990). Spatial resolution across the macaque retina. Vision Research 30: 985–991. Bisazza A, Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G (1998). The origins of cerebral asymmetry: a review of evidence of behavioural and brain lateralization in fishes, reptiles and amphibians. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 22: 411–426. Jennings JAM, Charman WN (1981). Off-axis image quality in the human eye. Vision Research 21: 445–455. Ward JP, Hopkins WD (1993). Primate Laterality: Current Behavioral Evidence of Primate Asymmetries. Berlin, Springer. Braccini SN, Lambeth SP, Schapiro SJ, Fitch WT (2012). Eye preferences in captive chimpanzees. Animal Cognition 15: 971–978. Zhao DP, Hopkins WD, Li BG (2012). Handedness in nature: first evidence of manual laterality on bimanual coordinated tube task in wild primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 148: 36–44. Güntürkun O, Kesch S (1987). Visual lateralization during feeding in pigeons. Behavioural Neuroscience 101: 433–435. Rogers LJ, Andrew RJ (2002). Comparative Vertebrate Lateralization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G (2017). Lateralized Brain Functions: Methods in Human and Non-human Species. Neuromethods, Vol 122. New York, Humana Press. Sovrano VA, Dadda M, Bisazza A (2005). Lateralized fish perform better than nonlateralized fish in spatial reorientation tasks. Behavioural Brain Research 163: 122–127. Zhao DP, Li BG (2013). Footedness from a spontaneously bipedal posture of Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) in the Qinling Mountains. Acta Theriologica Sinica 33: 1–6. Rogers LJ (1997). Early experiential effects on laterality: research on chicks has relevance to other species. Laterality 2: 199–219. Chapelain AS, Blois-Heulin C (2009). Lateralization for visual processes: eye preference in Campbell’s monkeys (Cercopithecus c. campbelli). Animal Cognition 12: 11–19. Wikler KC, Williams RW, Rakic P (1990). Photoreceptor mosaic: number and distribution of rods and cones in the rhesus monkey retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 297: 499–508. Lustig A, Keter-Katz H, Katzir G (2012). Threat perception in the chameleon (Chamaeleo chameleon): evidence for lateralized eye use. Animal Cognition 15: 609–621. Zhao DP, Li BS, Li BG (2019). Postural effect on manual laterality during grooming in northern white-cheeked gibbons (Nomascus leucogenys). Zoological Research 40: 449–455. Rogers LJ, Anson JM (1979). Lateralization of function in the chicken forebrain. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 10: 679–686. Nedellec-Bienvenue, D, Blois-Heulin C (2005). Eye preferences in red-capped mangabeys. Folia Primatologica 76: 234–237. Davidson RJ (1995). Cerebral asymmetry, emotion, and affective style. In Brain Asymmetry (Davidson RJ, Hugdahl K, eds.), pp 361–387. Cambridge, MIT Press. Zhao DP, Li BG, Watanabe K (2008e). First evidence on foot preference during locomotion in Old World monkeys: a study of quadrupedal and bipedal actions in Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana). Primates 49: 260–264. Rogers LJ, Ward JP, Stafford D (1994). Eye dominance in the small-eared bushbaby, Otolemur garnettii. Neuropsychologia 32: 257–264. Westergaard GC, Suomi SJ (1996). Lateral bias for rotational behavior in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology 110: 199–202. Zhao DP, Li BG, Grove CP, Watanabe K (2008a). Impact of male takeover on intra-unit sexual interactions and subsequent interbirth interval of wild Rhinopithecus roxellana. Folia Primatologica 79: 93–102. Rosa Salva O, Regolin L, Mascalzoni E, Vallortigara G (2012). Cerebral and behavioural asymmetry in animal social recognition. Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews 7: 110–138. Bishop PO, Jeremy D, Lance JW (1953). The optic nerve: properties of a central tract. Journal of Physiology 121: 415–432. Rogers LJ, Zucca P, Vallortigara G (2004). Advantage of having a lateralized brain. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 271: S420–S422. Kounin JS (1938). Laterality in monkeys. The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology 52: 375–393. de Latude M, Demange M, Bec P, Blois-Heulin C (2009). Visual laterality responses to different emotive stimuli by red-capped mangabeys, Cercocebus torquatus torquatus. Animal Cognition 12: 31–42. Maddess RJ (1975). Reaction time to hemiretinal stimulation. Neuropsychologia 13: 213–218. Hopkins WD, Bennett AJ (1994). Handedness and approach-avoiding behavior in chimpanzees (Pan). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 20: 413–418. Rutherford HJV, Lindell AK (2011). Thriving and surviving: approach and avoidance motivation and lateralization. Emotion Review 3: 333–343. Porac C, Coren S (1981). Lateral Preferences and Human Behavior. New York, Springer. Zhao DP, Li BG (2009). Do deposed adult male Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) roam as solitary bachelors or continue to interact with former band members? Current Zoology 55: 235–237. Hook-Costigan MA, Rogers LJ (1995). Hand, mouth and eye preferences in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Folia Primatologica 64: 180–191. Jeffery G (2001). Architecture of the optic chiasm and the mechanisms that sculpt its development. Psychological Review 81: 1393–1414. Sherman GF, Garbanati JA, Rosen GD, Yutzey DA, Denenberg VH (1980). Brain and behavioral asymmetries for spatial preference in rats. Brain Research 192: 61–67. Leliveld LMC, Langbein J, Puppe B (2013). The emergence of emotional lateralization: evidence in non-human vertebrates and implications for farm animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 145: 1–14. Hopkins WD, Bard KA (1993). Hemispheric specialization in infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence for a relation with gender and arousal. Developmental Psychobiology 26: 219–235. Packer O, Hendrickson AE, Curcio CA (1989). Photoreceptor topography of the retina in the adult pigtail macaque (Macaca nemestrina). Journal of Comparative Neurology 288: 165–183. Chanvallon S, Blois-Heulin C, de Latour PR, Lemasson A (2017). Spontaneous approaches to divers by free-ranging orcas (Oricinus orca): age- and sex- differences in exploratory behaviours and visual laterality. Scientific Reports 7: 10922. Zhao DP, Gao X, Li BG (2010). Hand preference for spontaneously unimanual and bimanual coordinated tasks in wild Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys: implication for hemispheric specialization. Behavioural Brain Research 208: 85–89. Bard KA, Hopkins WD, Fort CL (1990). Lateral bias in infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology 104: 309–321. Hook-Costigan MA, Rogers LJ (1998). Eye preferences in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): influence of age, stimulus, and hand preference. Laterality 3: 109–130. Hopkins WD, Bard KA (2000). A longitudinal study of hand preference in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Developmental Psychobiology 36: 292–300. Wilder HD, Grünert U, Lee BB, Martin PR (1996). Topography of ganglion cells and photoreceptors in the retina of the new world monkey: the marmoset Callithrix jacchus. Visual Neuroscience 13: 335–352. Demaree HA, Everhart E, Youngstrom EA, Harrison DW (2005). Brain lateralization of emotional processing: historical roots and a future incorporating “dominance.”. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 4: 3–20. Levy J (1977). The mammalian brain and the adaptive advantage of cerebral asymmetry. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 299: 264–272. Farmer K, Krueger K, Byrne RW (2010). Visual laterality in the domestic horse (E |
| References_xml | – reference: Zhao DP, Li BG, Watanabe K (2008e). First evidence on foot preference during locomotion in Old World monkeys: a study of quadrupedal and bipedal actions in Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana). Primates 49: 260–264. – reference: de Latude M, Demange M, Bec P, Blois-Heulin C (2009). Visual laterality responses to different emotive stimuli by red-capped mangabeys, Cercocebus torquatus torquatus. Animal Cognition 12: 31–42. – reference: Sherman GF, Garbanati JA, Rosen GD, Yutzey DA, Denenberg VH (1980). Brain and behavioral asymmetries for spatial preference in rats. Brain Research 192: 61–67. – reference: Ghirlanda S, Frasnelli E, Vallortigara G (2009). Intraspecific competition and coordination in the evolution of lateralization. Philsophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364: 861–866. – reference: Zhao DP, Li BS, Li BG (2019). Postural effect on manual laterality during grooming in northern white-cheeked gibbons (Nomascus leucogenys). Zoological Research 40: 449–455. – reference: Bisazza A, Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G (1998). The origins of cerebral asymmetry: a review of evidence of behavioural and brain lateralization in fishes, reptiles and amphibians. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 22: 411–426. – reference: Maddess RJ (1975). Reaction time to hemiretinal stimulation. Neuropsychologia 13: 213–218. – reference: Hopkins WD, Bennett AJ (1994). Handedness and approach-avoiding behavior in chimpanzees (Pan). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 20: 413–418. – reference: Bishop PO, Jeremy D, Lance JW (1953). The optic nerve: properties of a central tract. Journal of Physiology 121: 415–432. – reference: Hook-Costigan MA, Rogers LJ (1995). Hand, mouth and eye preferences in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Folia Primatologica 64: 180–191. – reference: Leliveld LMC, Langbein J, Puppe B (2013). The emergence of emotional lateralization: evidence in non-human vertebrates and implications for farm animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 145: 1–14. – reference: Rogers LJ, Zucca P, Vallortigara G (2004). Advantage of having a lateralized brain. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 271: S420–S422. – reference: Lustig A, Keter-Katz H, Katzir G (2012). Threat perception in the chameleon (Chamaeleo chameleon): evidence for lateralized eye use. Animal Cognition 15: 609–621. – reference: Cole J (1957). Laterality in the use of the hand, foot, and eye in monkeys. Journal of Comparative Psychology 50: 296–299. – reference: Hopkins WD (2007). The Evolution of Hemispheric Specialization in Primates. San Diego, Academic Press. – reference: Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G (2017). Lateralized Brain Functions: Methods in Human and Non-human Species. Neuromethods, Vol 122. New York, Humana Press. – reference: Karenina KA, Giljov AN, Malashichev YB (2013). Eye as a key element of conspecific image eliciting lateralized response in fish. Animal Cognition 16: 287–300. – reference: Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Packer O, Hendrickson AE, Kalina RE (1987). Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry. Science 236: 579–582. – reference: Sovrano VA, Dadda M, Bisazza A (2005). Lateralized fish perform better than nonlateralized fish in spatial reorientation tasks. Behavioural Brain Research 163: 122–127. – reference: Zhao DP, Gao X, Li BG (2010). Hand preference for spontaneously unimanual and bimanual coordinated tasks in wild Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys: implication for hemispheric specialization. Behavioural Brain Research 208: 85–89. – reference: Zhao DP, Li BG, Grove CP, Watanabe K (2008a). Impact of male takeover on intra-unit sexual interactions and subsequent interbirth interval of wild Rhinopithecus roxellana. Folia Primatologica 79: 93–102. – reference: Rutherford HJV, Lindell AK (2011). Thriving and surviving: approach and avoidance motivation and lateralization. Emotion Review 3: 333–343. – reference: Kounin JS (1938). Laterality in monkeys. The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology 52: 375–393. – reference: Zhao DP, Tian XL, Liu XC, Chen ZY, Li BG (2016). Effect of target animacy on hand preference in Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana). Animal Cognition 19: 977–985. – reference: Wilder HD, Grünert U, Lee BB, Martin PR (1996). Topography of ganglion cells and photoreceptors in the retina of the new world monkey: the marmoset Callithrix jacchus. Visual Neuroscience 13: 335–352. – reference: Lindell AK (2013). Continuities in emotion lateralization in human and non-human primates. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 464. – reference: Chanvallon S, Blois-Heulin C, de Latour PR, Lemasson A (2017). Spontaneous approaches to divers by free-ranging orcas (Oricinus orca): age- and sex- differences in exploratory behaviours and visual laterality. Scientific Reports 7: 10922. – reference: Zhao DP, Gao X, Li BG, Watanabe K (2008d). First wild evidence of neonate nipple preference and maternal cradling laterality in Old World monkeys: a preliminary study from Rhinopithecus roxellana. Behavioural Processes 77: 364–368. – reference: Zhao DP, Li BG (2009). Do deposed adult male Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) roam as solitary bachelors or continue to interact with former band members? Current Zoology 55: 235–237. – reference: Davidson RJ (1995). Cerebral asymmetry, emotion, and affective style. In Brain Asymmetry (Davidson RJ, Hugdahl K, eds.), pp 361–387. Cambridge, MIT Press. – reference: Packer O, Hendrickson AE, Curcio CA (1989). Photoreceptor topography of the retina in the adult pigtail macaque (Macaca nemestrina). Journal of Comparative Neurology 288: 165–183. – reference: Ward JP, Hopkins WD (1993). Primate Laterality: Current Behavioral Evidence of Primate Asymmetries. Berlin, Springer. – reference: Rogers LJ (1997). Early experiential effects on laterality: research on chicks has relevance to other species. Laterality 2: 199–219. – reference: Rosa Salva O, Regolin L, Mascalzoni E, Vallortigara G (2012). Cerebral and behavioural asymmetry in animal social recognition. Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews 7: 110–138. – reference: Güntürkun O, Kesch S (1987). Visual lateralization during feeding in pigeons. Behavioural Neuroscience 101: 433–435. – reference: Wiper ML (2017). Evolutionary and mechanistic drivers of laterality: a review and new synthesis. Laterality 22: 740–770. – reference: Braccini SN, Lambeth SP, Schapiro SJ, Fitch WT (2012). Eye preferences in captive chimpanzees. Animal Cognition 15: 971–978. – reference: Zhao DP, Wang Y, Han KJ, Zhang HB, Li BG (2015). Does target animacy influence manual laterality of monkeys? first answer from northern pig-tailed macaques (Macaca leonina). Animal Cognition 18: 931–936. – reference: Nedellec-Bienvenue, D, Blois-Heulin C (2005). Eye preferences in red-capped mangabeys. Folia Primatologica 76: 234–237. – reference: Piddington T, Rogers LJ (2013). Strength of hand preference and dual task performance by common marmosets. Animal Cognition 16: 127–135. – reference: Westergaard GC, Suomi SJ (1996). Lateral bias for rotational behavior in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology 110: 199–202. – reference: Wässle H, Grünert U, Röhrenbeck J, Boycott BB (1990). Retinal ganglion cell density and cortical magnification factor in the primate. Vision Research 30: 1897–1911. – reference: Wikler KC, Williams RW, Rakic P (1990). Photoreceptor mosaic: number and distribution of rods and cones in the rhesus monkey retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 297: 499–508. – reference: Chapelain AS, Blois-Heulin C (2009). Lateralization for visual processes: eye preference in Campbell’s monkeys (Cercopithecus c. campbelli). Animal Cognition 12: 11–19. – reference: Farmer K, Krueger K, Byrne RW (2010). Visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) interacting with humans. Animal Cognition 13: 229–238. – reference: Jennings JAM, Charman WN (1981). Off-axis image quality in the human eye. Vision Research 21: 445–455. – reference: Merigan WH, Katz LM (1990). Spatial resolution across the macaque retina. Vision Research 30: 985–991. – reference: Zhao DP, Hopkins WD, Li BG (2012). Handedness in nature: first evidence of manual laterality on bimanual coordinated tube task in wild primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 148: 36–44. – reference: Zhao DP, Li BS, Li BG (2020). How target animacy affects manual laterality in hylobatidae: the first evidence in northern white-cheeked gibbons (Nomascus leucogenys). Folia Primatologica 91: 445-451. – reference: Rogers LJ, Ward JP, Stafford D (1994). Eye dominance in the small-eared bushbaby, Otolemur garnettii. Neuropsychologia 32: 257–264. – reference: Hopkins WD, Bard KA (2000). A longitudinal study of hand preference in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Developmental Psychobiology 36: 292–300. – reference: Zhao DP, Li BG, Watanabe K (2011). Impact of group size on female reproductive success of free-ranging Rhinopithecus roxellana in the Qinling Mountains, China. Folia Primatologica 82: 1–12. – reference: Rogers LJ, Anson JM (1979). Lateralization of function in the chicken forebrain. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 10: 679–686. – reference: Porac C, Coren S (1981). Lateral Preferences and Human Behavior. New York, Springer. – reference: Vallortigara G (2000). Comparative neuropsychology of the dual brain: a stroll through animals’ left and right perceptual worlds. Brain and Language 73: 189–219. – reference: Borod JC, Cicero BA, Obler LK, Welkowitz J, Erhan HM, Santschi, C, et al. (1998). Right hemisphere emotional perception: evidence across multiple channels. Neuropsychology 12: 446–458. – reference: Bard KA, Hopkins WD, Fort CL (1990). Lateral bias in infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology 104: 309–321. – reference: Frasnelli E, Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ (2012). Left-right asymmetries of behaviour and nervous system in invertebrates. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 36: 1273–1291. – reference: Jeffery G (2001). Architecture of the optic chiasm and the mechanisms that sculpt its development. Psychological Review 81: 1393–1414. – reference: Zhao DP, Ji WH, Li BG, Watanabe K (2008b). Mate competition and reproductive correlates of female dispersal in a polygynous primate species (Rhinopithecus roxellana). Behavioural Processes 79: 165–170. – reference: Bibost AL, Brown C (2014). Laterality influences cognitive performance in rainbowfish Melanotaenia duboulayi. Animal Cognition 17: 1045–1051. – reference: Hopkins WD, Bard KA (1993). Hemispheric specialization in infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence for a relation with gender and arousal. Developmental Psychobiology 26: 219–235. – reference: Demaree HA, Everhart E, Youngstrom EA, Harrison DW (2005). Brain lateralization of emotional processing: historical roots and a future incorporating “dominance.”. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 4: 3–20. – reference: Levy J (1977). The mammalian brain and the adaptive advantage of cerebral asymmetry. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 299: 264–272. – reference: Hook-Costigan MA, Rogers LJ (1998). Eye preferences in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): influence of age, stimulus, and hand preference. Laterality 3: 109–130. – reference: Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G, Andrew RJ (2013). Divided Brains: The Biology and Behaviour of Brain Asymmetries. New York, Cambridge University Press. – reference: Martlnho III A, Burns ZT, von Bayern AMP, Kacelnlk A (2014). Monocular tool control, eye dominance, and laterality in New Caledonian crows. Current Biology 24: 2930–2934. – reference: Fitch WT, Braccini SN (2013). Primate laterality and the biology and evolution of human handedness: a review and synthesis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1288: 70–85. – reference: Rogers LJ, Andrew RJ (2002). Comparative Vertebrate Lateralization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. – reference: Robins A, Rogers LJ (2004). Lateralized prey-catching responses in the cane toad, Bufo marinus: analysis of complex visual stimuli. Animal Behaviour 68: 767–775. – reference: Wilson DA, Tomonaga M, Vick SJ (2016). Eye preference in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella). Primates 57: 433–440. – reference: Zhao DP, Li BG (2013). Footedness from a spontaneously bipedal posture of Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) in the Qinling Mountains. Acta Theriologica Sinica 33: 1–6. |
| SSID | ssj0015667 |
| Score | 2.2442122 |
| Snippet | This study presents the first evidence of effects of applying both positive and negative stimuli simultaneously on visual laterality in Old World monkeys.... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref karger brill |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 630 |
| SubjectTerms | Animals Colobinae - physiology Emotions Fear Female Functional Laterality - physiology Male Original Research Article Photic Stimulation |
| Title | Eye Preference for Emotional Stimuli in Sichuan Snub-Nosed Monkeys |
| URI | http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1159/000509442 https://karger.com/doi/10.1159/000509442 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937622 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2443881823 |
| Volume | 91 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3fb9MwELZGB9Je0IDBCgMZxAMSyuYmsVM_rqPVhMSEYJMGL5F_BSKqpGqTB_jrOcdOmm1FA16i1rlEib_z5Tv7fIfQayWEJtxkgWRjHsRakUBGVAbZiCah1Ikiid3v_OGMnV7E7y_p5bpSYbO7pJKH6tfGfSX_gyq0Aa52l-w_INvdFBrgN-ALR0AYjn-F8fSnsTEUbapYGzE4dWV5bI6PKrehT3ZC43Ouvtd2IBe1DM7KFZBMGMswfFd9bjor57l4u7DpJypvEnvTyqWLgF8Y_6lrJuGdofhS9wJ7creKUX6ry_6MAriPoyszCpNlPp_3beaIBjRxO0YPjTOTsQ3s4K4GU2tHXdUtry99o8j8yov7vjKXTeum6abcxTralH5O5lom7MZfoTztZO6g7RC8AzJA28eTd5NZt3wEHNUlS_WP7lNKwcVH3cXgjUj7plcIyd0fNv5--Wd3o6Ed57vovvcX8LED_wHaMsVDdO9r2ayGPEITUAG8VgEMKoA7FcBeBXBeYK8CeK0C2KvAHrqYTc9PTgNfFgNGEWNVAA8fjTMFxE7rzCgiFOUs4QL-UMNYrHkkgSdGghApIqG4jWImCQ81kHkB_PsxGhRlYfYRzqIxMaPYhGEGxpwabihclJAMaKmmNBwi3PRR6pV-ld7AYIjetN2XKp9W3lY3mW8SfdWJLlwulU1Cew6DTqRtP7jWPvv4yZ1KFzobopctYikYSLvqJQpT1qs0tN0FtDSMhuiJg7K7RQRkF9hA-PT293yGdtZj5QANqmVtngMfreQLr32_AevsgoM |
| linkProvider | EBSCOhost |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eye+Preference+for+Emotional+Stimuli+in+Sichuan+Snub-Nosed+Monkeys&rft.jtitle=Folia+primatologica&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Dapeng&rft.au=Wang%2C+Yuan&rft.au=Li%2C+Baoguo&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.pub=Brill&rft.issn=0015-5713&rft.eissn=1421-9980&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=630&rft.epage=642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159%2F000509442&rft.externalDocID=10_1159_000509442 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0015-5713&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0015-5713&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0015-5713&client=summon |