Simulated herbicide spray retention of commonly managed invasive emergent aquatic macrophytes
Invasive emergent and floating macrophytes can have detrimental impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Management of these aquatic weeds frequently relies upon foliar application of aquatic herbicides. However, there is inherent variability of overspray (herbicide loss) for foliar applications into waters w...
Saved in:
Published in | Weed technology Vol. 37; no. 3; pp. 243 - 250 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, USA
Cambridge University Press
01.06.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Invasive emergent and floating macrophytes can have detrimental impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Management of these aquatic weeds frequently relies upon foliar application of aquatic herbicides. However, there is inherent variability of overspray (herbicide loss) for foliar applications into waters within and adjacent to the targeted treatment area. The spray retention (tracer dye captured) of four invasive broadleaf emergent species (water hyacinth, alligatorweed, creeping water primrose, and parrotfeather) and two emergent grass-like weeds (cattail and torpedograss) were evaluated. For all species, spray retention was simulated using foliar applications of rhodamine WT (RWT) dye as a herbicide surrogate under controlled mesocosm conditions. Spray retention of the broadleaf species was first evaluated using a CO2-pressurized spray chamber overtop dense vegetation growth or no plants (positive control) at a greenhouse (GH) scale. Broadleaf species and grass-like species were then evaluated in larger outdoor mesocosms (OM). These applications were made using a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer. Evaluation metrics included species-wise canopy cover and height influence on in-water RWT concentration using image analysis and modeling techniques. Results indicated spray retention was greatest for water hyacinth (GH, 64.7 ± 7.4; OM, 76.1 ± 3.8). Spray retention values were similar among the three sprawling marginal species alligatorweed (GH, 37.5 ± 4.5; OM, 42 ± 5.7), creeping water primrose (GH, 54.9 ± 7.2; OM, 52.7 ± 5.7), and parrotfeather (GH, 48.2 ± 2.3; OM, 47.2 ± 3.5). Canopy cover and height were strongly correlated with spray retention for broadleaf species and less strongly correlated for grass-like species. Although torpedograss and cattail were similar in percent foliar coverage, they differed in percent spray retention (OM, 8.5± 2.3 and 28.9 ±4.1, respectively). The upright leaf architecture of the grass-like species likely influenced the lower spray retention values in comparison to the broadleaf species. Nomenclature: Alligatorweed; Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb.; cattail; Typha latifolia L.; creeping water primrose; Ludwigia grandiflora (Michx.) Greuter & Burdet; parrotfeather; Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc.; torpedograss Panicum repens L.; water hyacinth; Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract
Invasive emergent and floating macrophytes can have detrimental impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Management of these aquatic weeds frequently relies upon foliar application of aquatic herbicides. However, there is inherent variability of overspray (herbicide loss) for foliar applications into waters within and adjacent to the targeted treatment area. The spray retention (tracer dye captured) of four invasive broadleaf emergent species (water hyacinth, alligatorweed, creeping water primrose, and parrotfeather) and two emergent grass-like weeds (cattail and torpedograss) were evaluated. For all species, spray retention was simulated using foliar applications of rhodamine WT (RWT) dye as a herbicide surrogate under controlled mesocosm conditions. Spray retention of the broadleaf species was first evaluated using a CO
2
-pressurized spray chamber overtop dense vegetation growth or no plants (positive control) at a greenhouse (GH) scale. Broadleaf species and grass-like species were then evaluated in larger outdoor mesocosms (OM). These applications were made using a CO
2
-pressurized backpack sprayer. Evaluation metrics included species-wise canopy cover and height influence on in-water RWT concentration using image analysis and modeling techniques. Results indicated spray retention was greatest for water hyacinth (GH, 64.7 ± 7.4; OM, 76.1 ± 3.8). Spray retention values were similar among the three sprawling marginal species alligatorweed (GH, 37.5 ± 4.5; OM, 42 ± 5.7), creeping water primrose (GH, 54.9 ± 7.2; OM, 52.7 ± 5.7), and parrotfeather (GH, 48.2 ± 2.3; OM, 47.2 ± 3.5). Canopy cover and height were strongly correlated with spray retention for broadleaf species and less strongly correlated for grass-like species. Although torpedograss and cattail were similar in percent foliar coverage, they differed in percent spray retention (OM, 8.5± 2.3 and 28.9 ±4.1, respectively). The upright leaf architecture of the grass-like species likely influenced the lower spray retention values in comparison to the broadleaf species. Invasive emergent and floating macrophytes can have detrimental impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Management of these aquatic weeds frequently relies upon foliar application of aquatic herbicides. However, there is inherent variability of overspray (herbicide loss) for foliar applications into waters within and adjacent to the targeted treatment area. The spray retention (tracer dye captured) of four invasive broadleaf emergent species (water hyacinth, alligatorweed, creeping water primrose, and parrotfeather) and two emergent grass-like weeds (cattail and torpedograss) were evaluated. For all species, spray retention was simulated using foliar applications of rhodamine WT (RWT) dye as a herbicide surrogate under controlled mesocosm conditions. Spray retention of the broadleaf species was first evaluated using a CO2-pressurized spray chamber overtop dense vegetation growth or no plants (positive control) at a greenhouse (GH) scale. Broadleaf species and grass-like species were then evaluated in larger outdoor mesocosms (OM). These applications were made using a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer. Evaluation metrics included species-wise canopy cover and height influence on in-water RWT concentration using image analysis and modeling techniques. Results indicated spray retention was greatest for water hyacinth (GH, 64.7 ± 7.4; OM, 76.1 ± 3.8). Spray retention values were similar among the three sprawling marginal species alligatorweed (GH, 37.5 ± 4.5; OM, 42 ± 5.7), creeping water primrose (GH, 54.9 ± 7.2; OM, 52.7 ± 5.7), and parrotfeather (GH, 48.2 ± 2.3; OM, 47.2 ± 3.5). Canopy cover and height were strongly correlated with spray retention for broadleaf species and less strongly correlated for grass-like species. Although torpedograss and cattail were similar in percent foliar coverage, they differed in percent spray retention (OM, 8.5± 2.3 and 28.9 ±4.1, respectively). The upright leaf architecture of the grass-like species likely influenced the lower spray retention values in comparison to the broadleaf species. Invasive emergent and floating macrophytes can have detrimental impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Management of these aquatic weeds frequently relies upon foliar application of aquatic herbicides. However, there is inherent variability of overspray (herbicide loss) for foliar applications into waters within and adjacent to the targeted treatment area. The spray retention (tracer dye captured) of four invasive broadleaf emergent species (water hyacinth, alligatorweed, creeping water primrose, and parrotfeather) and two emergent grass-like weeds (cattail and torpedograss) were evaluated. For all species, spray retention was simulated using foliar applications of rhodamine WT (RWT) dye as a herbicide surrogate under controlled mesocosm conditions. Spray retention of the broadleaf species was first evaluated using a CO2-pressurized spray chamber overtop dense vegetation growth or no plants (positive control) at a greenhouse (GH) scale. Broadleaf species and grass-like species were then evaluated in larger outdoor mesocosms (OM). These applications were made using a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer. Evaluation metrics included species-wise canopy cover and height influence on in-water RWT concentration using image analysis and modeling techniques. Results indicated spray retention was greatest for water hyacinth (GH, 64.7 ± 7.4; OM, 76.1 ± 3.8). Spray retention values were similar among the three sprawling marginal species alligatorweed (GH, 37.5 ± 4.5; OM, 42 ± 5.7), creeping water primrose (GH, 54.9 ± 7.2; OM, 52.7 ± 5.7), and parrotfeather (GH, 48.2 ± 2.3; OM, 47.2 ± 3.5). Canopy cover and height were strongly correlated with spray retention for broadleaf species and less strongly correlated for grass-like species. Although torpedograss and cattail were similar in percent foliar coverage, they differed in percent spray retention (OM, 8.5± 2.3 and 28.9 ±4.1, respectively). The upright leaf architecture of the grass-like species likely influenced the lower spray retention values in comparison to the broadleaf species. Nomenclature: Alligatorweed; Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb.; cattail; Typha latifolia L.; creeping water primrose; Ludwigia grandiflora (Michx.) Greuter & Burdet; parrotfeather; Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc.; torpedograss Panicum repens L.; water hyacinth; Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms |
Author | Mudge, Christopher R Richardson, Robert J Haug, Erika J Sperry, Benjamin P Getsinger, Kurt D Howell, Andrew W |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Erika J orcidid: 0000-0002-3654-5956 surname: Haug fullname: Haug, Erika J organization: Research Scholar, Aquatic and Non-Cropland Weed Science Laboratory, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Andrew W orcidid: 0000-0001-9721-2234 surname: Howell fullname: Howell, Andrew W organization: Research Scholar, Aquatic and Non-Cropland Weed Science Laboratory, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Benjamin P orcidid: 0000-0002-2471-2163 surname: Sperry fullname: Sperry, Benjamin P organization: Research Biologist, Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Gainesville, FL, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Christopher R surname: Mudge fullname: Mudge, Christopher R organization: Research Biologist, Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Gainesville, FL, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: Robert J orcidid: 0000-0002-1802-8728 surname: Richardson fullname: Richardson, Robert J organization: Professor, Aquatic and Non-Cropland Weed Science Laboratory, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA – sequence: 6 givenname: Kurt D surname: Getsinger fullname: Getsinger, Kurt D organization: Research Biologist, Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Gainesville, FL, USA |
BookMark | eNp90M9LwzAUwPEgE9ymJ_-BgieRzpekTdqjDH_BwIMKXiSkabplrE2XpJP-92bMs6d3-fDe4ztDk852GqFrDAsMmN__6LAgQOiCsDM0xXkOKeEZTNAUihJSoPzrAs283wJgRghM0fe7aYedDLpONtpVRplaJ753ckycDroLxnaJbRJl29Z2uzFpZSfXUZvuIL056ES32q0jTOR-kMGoKJSz_WYM2l-i80buvL76m3P0-fT4sXxJV2_Pr8uHVVqREkLKOYMa55DxppK6IKqWHHOqFJGsgKzWGTCmWKYk5aUiJJdFQxnlcZYyzxSdo5vT3t7Z_aB9EFs7uC6eFKTIWYFLVtKo7k4q_ue9043onWmlGwUGcewnYj9x7CcIi_r2pCtjY-V_7S_O5XPS |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/ps.5736 10.1002/ps.6479 10.1007/s00348-015-2012-9 10.1007/s00267-003-3023-5 10.1002/ps.5796 10.2307/4040120 10.1002/ps.507 10.1007/s11119-013-9345-2 10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0732:TPRCWQ]2.0.CO;2 10.1614/WT-D-12-00136.1 10.1023/A:1003999929094 10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n1p194-205/2016 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1993.tb01917.x 10.1002/ps.2780190403 10.1007/s10530-011-9942-9 10.1002/ps.2780150202 10.1016/0261-2194(94)90075-2 10.1017/wet.2021.85 10.1002/ps.2780370115 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0767:TROBIT]2.0.CO;2 10.1353/book13203 10.1038/35079573 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02294.x 10.1016/j.aquabot.2016.08.002 10.1002/ps.2780310104 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.002 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X2 7XB 8FE 8FH 8FK 8G5 ABUWG AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ GUQSH HCIFZ LK8 M0K M2O M7P MBDVC PADUT PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U |
DOI | 10.1017/wet.2023.26 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Student Research Library Prep SciTech Premium Collection Biological Sciences Agriculture Science Database ProQuest Research Library Biological Science Database Research Library (Corporate) Research Library China ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Agricultural Science Database Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Research Library Research Library China ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Agricultural Science Collection Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Agricultural Science Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: BENPR name: AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture |
EISSN | 1550-2740 |
EndPage | 250 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1017_wet_2023_26 10.1017/wet.2023.26 |
GroupedDBID | -JH 09C 09E 0R~ 123 8G5 AAAZR AABES AABWE AACFU AAEED AAGFV AAHKG AAKTX AASVR AAUKB AAXTN ABJNI ABKMT ABPLY ABQTM ABROB ABTLG ABZCX ACCHT ACGFS ACPRK ACQFJ ACUIJ ACUYZ ACWGA ACYZP ADBBV ADDNB ADGEJ ADHSS ADKIL ADOCW ADOYD ADVJH AEBAK AEDJY AEEJZ AENEX AEPYG AEYYC AFAZZ AFKQG AFLVW AFNWH AFRAH AFRIC AGABE AGJUD AGOOT AHQXX AHRGI AIGNW AIHIV AIOIP AJCYY AJPFC AKPMI ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AQJOH ATCPS ATUCA AUXHV BBLKV BBNVY BENPR BHPHI BLZWO BMAJL CBIIA CFAFE CJCSC CS3 DOHLZ EBS HCIFZ HZ~ IH6 IOEEP IS6 JBS JHPGK JLS JQKCU KCGVB KFECR LW7 M0K M2O M7P NIKVX NVHAQ O9- P2P PQ0 RBO RCA ROL S6U SAAAG SJN T9M TN5 UT1 WFFJZ WH7 Y6R ZMEZD ZYDXJ ~02 ~EF ~KM 29R 2AX 2~F 3V. 7X2 8FE 8FH AAHBH AAPSS AAYXX ABBHK ABBZL ABUWG ABVZP ABXAU ABXSQ ADACV ADOVH ADOVT ADULT AEHGV AENCP AEUPB AFFIJ AFKRA AGUYK AICQM AKZCZ ANHSF AQVQM ARZZG AS~ AYIQA AZQEC BCGOX BESQT BJBOZ BPHCQ CAG CBGCD CCPQU CCQAD CCUQV CFBFF CGQII CHEAL CITATION COF DATOO DC7 DOOOF DWQXO EGQIC EJD EQZMY GNUQQ GTFYD GUQSH H13 HGD HTVGU IL9 IOO IPSME JAAYA JBMMH JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLXEF JPM JSODD JST KAFGG LHUNA LK8 NEJ NHB NZEOI OVD PADUT PQQKQ PROAC Q5J SA0 TEORI ZDLDU ZJOSE 7XB 8FK MBDVC PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-b290t-7760d15047fbae82cda7173cc2a6804de4066c64ca379c225a8f36375a89a54c3 |
IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
ISSN | 0890-037X |
IngestDate | Thu Sep 19 14:53:58 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 12 18:32:07 EDT 2024 Sat Dec 16 06:25:26 EST 2023 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b290t-7760d15047fbae82cda7173cc2a6804de4066c64ca379c225a8f36375a89a54c3 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-3654-5956 0000-0002-1802-8728 0000-0001-9721-2234 0000-0002-2471-2163 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/B8CDE023484B49304A534D1FD3099A3F/S0890037X2300026Xa.pdf/div-class-title-simulated-herbicide-spray-retention-of-commonly-managed-invasive-emergent-aquatic-macrophytes-div.pdf |
PQID | 2856819693 |
PQPubID | 506325 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_2856819693 crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2023_26 bioone_primary_10_1017_wet_2023_26 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-06-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2023 text: 2023-06-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | New York, USA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York, USA – name: Lawrence |
PublicationTitle | Weed technology |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Weed Technol |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Publisher_xml | – name: Cambridge University Press |
References | Emerine (S0890037X2300026X_ref45) 2010; 48 S0890037X2300026X_ref1 S0890037X2300026X_ref4 S0890037X2300026X_ref3 S0890037X2300026X_ref6 S0890037X2300026X_ref5 S0890037X2300026X_ref8 Massinon (S0890037X2300026X_ref26) 2013; 17 S0890037X2300026X_ref7 S0890037X2300026X_ref9 S0890037X2300026X_ref10 S0890037X2300026X_ref11 S0890037X2300026X_ref31 Sculthorpe (S0890037X2300026X_ref37) 1967 Anderson (S0890037X2300026X_ref2) 1993 S0890037X2300026X_ref14 S0890037X2300026X_ref12 Murphy (S0890037X2300026X_ref30) 1993 S0890037X2300026X_ref13 Gettys (S0890037X2300026X_ref17) 2014 S0890037X2300026X_ref18 S0890037X2300026X_ref38 S0890037X2300026X_ref39 Nelson (S0890037X2300026X_ref33) 2007; 45 Katovich (S0890037X2300026X_ref24) 1996; 44 Radford (S0890037X2300026X_ref35) 1968 Getsinger (S0890037X2300026X_ref16) 2014 Gangstad (S0890037X2300026X_ref15) 1993 S0890037X2300026X_ref40 S0890037X2300026X_ref43 S0890037X2300026X_ref21 S0890037X2300026X_ref22 S0890037X2300026X_ref44 S0890037X2300026X_ref41 Pitlo (S0890037X2300026X_ref34) 1993 S0890037X2300026X_ref20 S0890037X2300026X_ref42 S0890037X2300026X_ref25 S0890037X2300026X_ref23 S0890037X2300026X_ref29 S0890037X2300026X_ref27 S0890037X2300026X_ref28 (S0890037X2300026X_ref36) 2020 Haller (S0890037X2300026X_ref19) 2020 Netherland (S0890037X2300026X_ref32) 2014 |
References_xml | – start-page: 85 volume-title: Aquatic Weeds: The Ecology and Management of Nuisance Aquatic Vegetation year: 1993 ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref15 contributor: fullname: Gangstad – start-page: 237 volume-title: Biology and Control of Aquatic Plants year: 2014 ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref17 contributor: fullname: Gettys – start-page: 74 volume-title: Aquatic Weeds: The Ecology and Management of Nuisance Aquatic Vegetation year: 1993 ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref34 contributor: fullname: Pitlo – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref44 doi: 10.1002/ps.5736 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref29 doi: 10.1002/ps.6479 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref8 doi: 10.1007/s00348-015-2012-9 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref21 doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-3023-5 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref23 doi: 10.1002/ps.5796 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref11 doi: 10.2307/4040120 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref13 doi: 10.1002/ps.507 – start-page: 456 volume-title: The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants year: 1967 ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref37 contributor: fullname: Sculthorpe – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref27 doi: 10.1007/s11119-013-9345-2 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref4 doi: 10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0732:TPRCWQ]2.0.CO;2 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref1 doi: 10.1614/WT-D-12-00136.1 – volume-title: R: A language and environment for statistical computing year: 2020 ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref36 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref28 doi: 10.1023/A:1003999929094 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref38 doi: 10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n1p194-205/2016 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref3 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1993.tb01917.x – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref6 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref7 doi: 10.1002/ps.2780190403 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref42 doi: 10.1007/s10530-011-9942-9 – start-page: 191 volume-title: Biology and Control of Aquatic Plants: A Best Management Practices Handbook year: 2020 ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref19 contributor: fullname: Haller – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref40 doi: 10.1002/ps.2780150202 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref25 doi: 10.1016/0261-2194(94)90075-2 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref39 doi: 10.1017/wet.2021.85 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref12 doi: 10.1002/ps.2780370115 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref5 doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0767:TROBIT]2.0.CO;2 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref31 – start-page: 371 volume-title: Aquatic Weeds: The Ecology and Management of Nuisance Aquatic Vegetation year: 1993 ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref2 contributor: fullname: Anderson – volume: 44 start-page: 143 year: 1996 ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref24 article-title: Influence of nontarget neighbors and spray volume on retention and efficacy of triclopyr in purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Weed publication-title: Sci contributor: fullname: Katovich – start-page: 71 volume-title: Biology and Control of Aquatic Plants: A Best Management Practices Handbook year: 2014 ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref32 contributor: fullname: Netherland – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref18 doi: 10.1353/book13203 – volume-title: Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas year: 1968 ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref35 contributor: fullname: Radford – volume: 17 start-page: 494 year: 2013 ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref26 article-title: Review of physicochemical processes involved in agrochemical spray retention publication-title: Biotechnologie, agronomie, société et environnement. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ contributor: fullname: Massinon – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref10 doi: 10.1038/35079573 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref43 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02294.x – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref22 doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2016.08.002 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref14 doi: 10.1002/ps.2780310104 – volume: 45 start-page: 58 year: 2007 ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref33 article-title: Effect of glyphosate rate and spray volume on control of giant salvinia publication-title: J Aquat Plant Manag contributor: fullname: Nelson – volume: 48 start-page: 105 year: 2010 ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref45 article-title: Greenhouse response of six aquatic invasive weeds to imazamox publication-title: J Aquat Manag contributor: fullname: Emerine – start-page: 74 volume-title: Aquatic Weeds: The Ecology and Management of Nuisance Aquatic Vegetation year: 1993 ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref30 contributor: fullname: Murphy – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref41 – start-page: 12p volume-title: Benefits of controlling nuisance aquatic plants and algae in the United States year: 2014 ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref16 contributor: fullname: Getsinger – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref9 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.002 – ident: S0890037X2300026X_ref20 |
SSID | ssj0016220 |
Score | 2.3737988 |
Snippet | Invasive emergent and floating macrophytes can have detrimental impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Management of these aquatic weeds frequently relies upon foliar... Abstract Invasive emergent and floating macrophytes can have detrimental impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Management of these aquatic weeds frequently relies... |
SourceID | proquest crossref bioone |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | 243 |
SubjectTerms | Alternanthera philoxeroides Aquatic ecosystems Aquatic plants Aquatic reptiles Aquatic weeds Canopies canopy cover Carbon dioxide Dyes Ecosystem management Experiments Floating plants Flowers & plants Foliar applications Grasses Herbicides Image analysis Image processing Invasive species Ludwigia uruguayensis Macrophytes Mesocosms Myriophyllum aquaticum overspray Panicum repens Plant growth Plants (botany) Retention Rhodamine rhodamine WT dye (RWT) Sprays Strategic management Typha Vegetation growth Water hyacinths Weeds |
Title | Simulated herbicide spray retention of commonly managed invasive emergent aquatic macrophytes |
URI | http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1017/wet.2023.26 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2856819693/abstract/ |
Volume | 37 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LS8QwEA6-DnoQn7i-CLLXum2STduTqCiL4CI-YC9SkkmqBd1nVfbfO7PtKl489dBQ2m-amY_MzDeMNV2c6ATDYmAj8IFS1qIfFJq6QKIoNxDamc7sbVd3ntRNr91bYJ15LwyVVc594sxRuwHQGXlLJCSVlepUtoylUwAoW2fDUUDzoyjPWg_TWGTLIlKUsF2-uOre3f9kFLSoJBqTNAxCGffqXj2Sj_7yVFQp5CkpLKzYYjDo-79h6q-XnoWe6w22XnNGfl4ZeZMt-P4WWzt_Gde6GX6bPT8U7zSIyzuORrAFFM7zyXBspnxMtJjg54Oc47fi679NeVW16njR_zRUwc591YdZcjMi9W_AFTTd63WKXHSHPV1fPV52gnpyQmBFGpZImXXokOqpOLfGJwKcoWw7gDA6CZXzGMY1aAVGxingljZJLrWM8ZqatgK5y5b6iMIe4wogBN9OdJojdTJRGkv0kTnSHMhBurzBTirEsmElj5FVdWNxhrBmBGsmdIM152j-v-xwjnRWb6VJ9mv4_f9vH7BVek5Vx3XIlsrxhz9CxlDa4_pn-AZvnsFX |
link.rule.ids | 315,786,790,21416,27957,27958,33779,43840,74659 |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT8MwDI5gIAEHxFM8BkSIa6FrsrQ9oYFA4zUhHtIuqEqcFCrBNrYB2r_HXjMQF049NKraL4n9NbY_M3Zg40Ql6BYDUwMXSGkM2sFIURVIrZZrCM1YZ_ampZqP8rJdb_sDt4FPq5zYxLGhtl2gM_KjKCGprFSl4rj3HlDXKIqu-hYa02xGCvxVqbCZk7PW7d1PHEFFpTBjkoZBKOK2r9Aj0egvR6mUkTgkXYVZU3S7HffXOf21zWOHc77EFj1T5I1yapfZlOussIXGc9-rZbhV9nRfvFH7LWc5Qm8KKKzjg15fj3ifyDCBzrs5xy_E138d8TJX1fKi86kpb527svpyyPU7aX4DjqCeXi8jZKBr7PH87OG0Gfh-CYGJ0nCIRFmFFgmejHOjXRKB1RRjB4i0SkJpHTpvBUqCFnEKuJF1kgslYrymui5BrLNKB1HYYFwChODqiUpzJEy6lsYCLWOO5AZyEDbfZPslYlmvFMXIymyxOENYM4I1i9QmO5ig-f-w6gTpzG-gQfY73Vv_395jc82Hm-vs-qJ1tc3m6ZllJleVVYb9D7eDnGFodv3C-AYtbcCK |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fT9swELZYQdP2MAFjWrfCLMRrRhq7TvI0waAqA6oKqNQXFNlne4u09fdA_e-5a1xQX3jKQ6wouTvffYq_-46xI5tmKsOyGJkmuEhKYzAPJoq6QJpNryE2S53Z667q9OWvQWsQ-E-zQKtc5cRlorYjoH_kx0lGUlm5ysWxD7SI3ln7x3gS0QQpOmkN4zTesM1UqhZG-Obpebd383ymoJJKpDHL4ygW6SB065GA9KMjWmUivpPGwpYpR6OhWy9U63l6WXza2-xDQI38pHLzDttww132_uT3NChnuI_s_rb8R6O4nOXoBlNCaR2fjad6wacEjMkBfOQ5fi2-_t8Fr3irlpfDB00cdu6qTsw51xPS_wZcQfO9_iwQje6xfvv87mcnCrMTIpPk8RxBs4otgj2ZeqNdloDVdN4OkGiVxdI6LOQKlAQt0hxwU-vMCyVSvOa6JUF8YrUhWuEz4xIgBtfKVO4RPOlmngrMkh6BDngQ1tfZYWWxYlwJZBQVcywt0KwFmbVIVJ0draz5-rLGytJF2Eyz4sX1X16__Y29xZgori66l1_ZO3pkRepqsNp8-t_tI3yYm4MQF08Mg8TH |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simulated+herbicide+spray+retention+of+commonly+managed+invasive+emergent+aquatic+macrophytes&rft.jtitle=Weed+technology&rft.au=Haug%2C+Erika+J&rft.au=Howell%2C+Andrew+W&rft.au=Sperry%2C+Benjamin+P&rft.au=Mudge%2C+Christopher+R&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=250&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017%2Fwet.2023.26&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1017_wet_2023_26 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0890-037X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0890-037X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0890-037X&client=summon |