Towards the regeneration of brown mosses for fen restoration

A low rate of establishment in brown mosses is generally observed following large-scale restoration of fens. As brown mosses are important components in peat accumulation in fens, their low recovery rate has been a concern in the past decade. It was suggested that the restoration method used for bog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Bryologist Vol. 125; no. 1; pp. 23 - 35
Main Authors Meilleur, Sébastien, Guêné-Nanchen, Mélina, Hugron, Sandrine, Fenton, Nicole J, Rochefort, Line
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published American Bryological and Lichenological Society 04.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract A low rate of establishment in brown mosses is generally observed following large-scale restoration of fens. As brown mosses are important components in peat accumulation in fens, their low recovery rate has been a concern in the past decade. It was suggested that the restoration method used for bogs, the Moss Layer Transfer Technique (MLTT) should be adapted for fen restoration by identifying factors limiting the establishment and recovery of brown mosses. In this study, we evaluated the regeneration potential of four common brown mosses, Aulacomnium palustre, Campylium stellatum, Scorpidium cossonii and Tomentypnum nitens, according to three factors that can have an impact during restoration: 1) distance of the fragment below the moss apex, 2) mechanical fragmentation of mosses, and 3) enhanced nutrient availability, and this, in growth chambers (within Petri dishes) and field experiments. Under controlled conditions, similar results were obtained for all four brown mosses studied: the severe fragmentation of mosses most drastically improved their regeneration potential. Phosphate fertilization, even at the lowest dose, increased moss regeneration, and brown mosses showed higher recovery in the first 3 cm below the apex. Liming only improved the regeneration of C. stellatum. However, unclear, and even contradicting results were obtained when treatments were applied in the field, where an overall very low establishment of brown mosses was observed in response to the rather prevailing adverse environmental conditions (e.g., erosion, frost heaving, low water table level). The direct application of some of our results into an adapted version of MLTT might be challenging, as it may require a certain level of meticulosity that large-scale mechanical fen restoration cannot provide.
AbstractList A low rate of establishment in brown mosses is generally observed following large-scale restoration of fens. As brown mosses are important components in peat accumulation in fens, their low recovery rate has been a concern in the past decade. It was suggested that the restoration method used for bogs, the Moss Layer Transfer Technique (MLTT) should be adapted for fen restoration by identifying factors limiting the establishment and recovery of brown mosses. In this study, we evaluated the regeneration potential of four common brown mosses, Aulacomnium palustre, Campylium stellatum, Scorpidium cossonii and Tomentypnum nitens, according to three factors that can have an impact during restoration: 1) distance of the fragment below the moss apex, 2) mechanical fragmentation of mosses, and 3) enhanced nutrient availability, and this, in growth chambers (within Petri dishes) and field experiments. Under controlled conditions, similar results were obtained for all four brown mosses studied: the severe fragmentation of mosses most drastically improved their regeneration potential. Phosphate fertilization, even at the lowest dose, increased moss regeneration, and brown mosses showed higher recovery in the first 3 cm below the apex. Liming only improved the regeneration of C. stellatum. However, unclear, and even contradicting results were obtained when treatments were applied in the field, where an overall very low establishment of brown mosses was observed in response to the rather prevailing adverse environmental conditions (e.g., erosion, frost heaving, low water table level). The direct application of some of our results into an adapted version of MLTT might be challenging, as it may require a certain level of meticulosity that large-scale mechanical fen restoration cannot provide.
Author Hugron, Sandrine
Guêné-Nanchen, Mélina
Fenton, Nicole J
Meilleur, Sébastien
Rochefort, Line
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sébastien
  surname: Meilleur
  fullname: Meilleur, Sébastien
  organization: Peatland Ecology Research Group, Centre for Northern Studies and Plant Sciences Department, 2480 boulevard Hochelaga, Université Laval, Quebec City, G1V 0A6, Québec, Canada
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Mélina
  surname: Guêné-Nanchen
  fullname: Guêné-Nanchen, Mélina
  organization: Peatland Ecology Research Group, Centre for Northern Studies and Plant Sciences Department, 2480 boulevard Hochelaga, Université Laval, Quebec City, G1V 0A6, Québec, Canada
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Sandrine
  surname: Hugron
  fullname: Hugron, Sandrine
  organization: Peatland Ecology Research Group, Centre for Northern Studies and Plant Sciences Department, 2480 boulevard Hochelaga, Université Laval, Quebec City, G1V 0A6, Québec, Canada
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Nicole J
  surname: Fenton
  fullname: Fenton, Nicole J
  organization: Institut de Recherche sur les Forêts, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, 445 boulevard de l'Université, Rouyn-Noranda, Québec J9X 5E4, Canada
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Line
  surname: Rochefort
  fullname: Rochefort, Line
  organization: Peatland Ecology Research Group, Centre for Northern Studies and Plant Sciences Department, 2480 boulevard Hochelaga, Université Laval, Quebec City, G1V 0A6, Québec, Canada
BookMark eNqNkb1OwzAURi1UJNrCE7B4ZEnxtWPHllhQBQWpEkuZLcexISiNi52q4u1xCWJggeku57s_587QpA-9Q-gSyAIEU9eEkKqgVckLoHwBC0LZCZqCYrIoWSUnaPpDnKFZSm-EgKBETNHNJhxMbBIeXh2O7sX1LpqhDT0OHtcxHHq8DSm5hH2I2Ls-Q2kII3OOTr3pkrv4rnP0fH-3WT4U66fV4_J2XdSUl0NhbKU4U0p5D9RSxUvXCOJpwy00UjpZS1FXRHoAxplpqLWyYcIpKWsBpmJzdDX23cXwvs_z9bZN1nWd6V3YJ02FAMKpBJlRNqI25rWj83oX262JHxqIPrrSRxP6aEJnVxp0dpVT6lfKtsPXiUM0bfdHFsZs3Yb8lX_N-wRtAX50
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2024_107496
Cites_doi 10.1007/BF03161431
10.4141/S00-089
10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009002127.x
10.1007/BF00047765
10.18637/jss.v082.i13
10.1007/BF03161517
10.1007/s11104-014-2193-7
10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00283.x
10.1139/cjb-2016-0023
10.1639/079.031.0402
10.1639/0007-2745(2007)110[595:DIBAR]2.0.CO;2
10.1139/f95-059
10.1371/journal.pone.0187944
10.1017/CBO9781139059152.015
10.1139/B07-045
10.1639/0007-2745(2000)103[0503:SAKGIH]2.0.CO;2
10.2307/2403339
10.1007/978-94-017-1335-1_6
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02300.x
10.2307/3243564
10.1111/j.1600-0587.1992.tb00015.x
10.1111/gcb.14449
10.1139/b05-025
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.051
10.2307/3243306
10.5822/978-1-61091-042-2
10.1139/cjb-2016-0281
10.1017/CBO9781139177788.011
10.1639/0007-2745(2005)108[86:FIBAAD]2.0.CO;2
10.1111/j.1654-109X.2004.tb00612.x
10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.019
10.1672/06-136.1
10.1639/0007-2745(2000)103[0592:WDOBFI]2.0.CO;2
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.12.015
10.1002/ecs2.2823
10.5586/asbp.1992.001
10.1007/BF00379011
10.1016/j.flora.2010.04.020
10.7872/cryb.v35.iss4.2014.397
10.1007/BF03160747
10.3170/2008-7-18565
10.1111/j.1654-109X.2006.tb00672.x
10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.017
10.1007/s10661-009-1030-6
10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00009.x
10.1639/0007-2745(2002)105[0096:ROPMTB]2.0.CO;2
10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00437.x
10.1179/jbr.1992.17.1.59
10.3176/eco.2010.1.02
10.1017/CBO9781139171304.011
10.1139/cjb-2018-0109
10.1017/CBO9780511754807
10.1016/0006-3207(94)90331-X
10.1016/j.ppees.2014.06.003
10.1023/A:1022011027946
10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00046-9
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.05.001
10.1111/1365-2664.12555
10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.019
10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0032:DHTFSR]2.0.CO;2
10.1672/0277-5212(2000)020[0616:COWAPC]2.0.CO;2
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright ©2022 by The American Bryological and Lichenological Society, Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright ©2022 by The American Bryological and Lichenological Society, Inc.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1639/0007-2745-125.1.023
DatabaseName CrossRef
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
AGRICOLA
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Botany
EISSN 1938-4378
EndPage 35
ExternalDocumentID 10_1639_0007_2745_125_1_023
10.1639/0007-2745-125.1.023
GroupedDBID 02
123
23N
79B
AACFU
AAPSS
ABDBF
ADHSS
ADOYD
AEDJY
AENEX
AEPYG
AEUPB
AFNWH
AKPMI
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CS3
DU5
EBD
EF
F5P
JH
JLS
KM
L7B
OK1
P2P
PQ0
Q5J
RBO
WH7
X
XOL
ZCG
-JH
-~X
AAHBH
AAHKG
AAXTN
AAYXX
ABPLY
ABTLG
ACUHS
AEEJZ
AFAZZ
CITATION
LU7
ZCA
~02
~EF
~KM
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-b254t-ac7953999ff12c2954ed60f2d5c1d88e8b86b708f11353ad2cc8d36e988b61a73
ISSN 0007-2745
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 10:22:01 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:50:44 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:09:40 EDT 2025
Thu Mar 10 06:32:58 EST 2022
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b254t-ac7953999ff12c2954ed60f2d5c1d88e8b86b708f11353ad2cc8d36e988b61a73
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PQID 2661052818
PQPubID 24069
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2661052818
crossref_primary_10_1639_0007_2745_125_1_023
crossref_citationtrail_10_1639_0007_2745_125_1_023
bioone_primary_10_1639_0007_2745_125_1_023
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20220104
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-01-04
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2022
  text: 20220104
  day: 04
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle The Bryologist
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher American Bryological and Lichenological Society
Publisher_xml – name: American Bryological and Lichenological Society
References 44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
10
54
11
55
12
56
13
57
14
58
15
59
16
17
18
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
60
61
62
63
20
64
21
65
66
22
23
67
24
68
25
69
26
27
28
29
70
71
72
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
References_xml – ident: 39
  doi: 10.1007/BF03161431
– ident: 7
  doi: 10.4141/S00-089
– ident: 51
  doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009002127.x
– ident: 52
  doi: 10.1007/BF00047765
– ident: 36
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
– ident: 16
– ident: 6
  doi: 10.1007/BF03161517
– ident: 10
  doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2193-7
– ident: 25
  doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00283.x
– ident: 61
  doi: 10.1139/cjb-2016-0023
– ident: 66
  doi: 10.1639/079.031.0402
– ident: 58
  doi: 10.1639/0007-2745(2007)110[595:DIBAR]2.0.CO;2
– ident: 68
  doi: 10.1139/f95-059
– ident: 60
– ident: 47
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187944
– ident: 21
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139059152.015
– ident: 2
  doi: 10.1139/B07-045
– ident: 63
  doi: 10.1639/0007-2745(2000)103[0503:SAKGIH]2.0.CO;2
– ident: 64
  doi: 10.2307/2403339
– ident: 38
  doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-1335-1_6
– ident: 1
– ident: 59
– ident: 35
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02300.x
– ident: 71
– ident: 14
  doi: 10.2307/3243564
– ident: 42
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1992.tb00015.x
– ident: 49
  doi: 10.1111/gcb.14449
– ident: 53
  doi: 10.1139/b05-025
– ident: 19
  doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.051
– ident: 69
  doi: 10.2307/3243306
– ident: 31
  doi: 10.5822/978-1-61091-042-2
– ident: 4
  doi: 10.1139/cjb-2016-0281
– ident: 33
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139177788.011
– ident: 40
– ident: 48
  doi: 10.1639/0007-2745(2005)108[86:FIBAAD]2.0.CO;2
– ident: 18
– ident: 9
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2004.tb00612.x
– ident: 3
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.019
– ident: 24
  doi: 10.1672/06-136.1
– ident: 46
  doi: 10.1639/0007-2745(2000)103[0592:WDOBFI]2.0.CO;2
– ident: 37
– ident: 43
  doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.12.015
– ident: 50
  doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2823
– ident: 20
  doi: 10.5586/asbp.1992.001
– ident: 28
– ident: 70
  doi: 10.1007/BF00379011
– ident: 12
  doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2010.04.020
– ident: 57
– ident: 45
  doi: 10.7872/cryb.v35.iss4.2014.397
– ident: 8
  doi: 10.1007/BF03160747
– ident: 22
  doi: 10.3170/2008-7-18565
– ident: 34
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2006.tb00672.x
– ident: 44
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.017
– ident: 29
  doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-1030-6
– ident: 26
  doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00009.x
– ident: 11
  doi: 10.1639/0007-2745(2002)105[0096:ROPMTB]2.0.CO;2
– ident: 23
  doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00437.x
– ident: 41
  doi: 10.1179/jbr.1992.17.1.59
– ident: 30
  doi: 10.3176/eco.2010.1.02
– ident: 67
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139171304.011
– ident: 15
– ident: 13
  doi: 10.1139/cjb-2018-0109
– ident: 17
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511754807
– ident: 32
  doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)90331-X
– ident: 27
  doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2014.06.003
– ident: 62
  doi: 10.1023/A:1022011027946
– ident: 56
  doi: 10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00046-9
– ident: 65
  doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.05.001
– ident: 5
  doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12555
– ident: 54
  doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.019
– ident: 55
  doi: 10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0032:DHTFSR]2.0.CO;2
– ident: 72
  doi: 10.1672/0277-5212(2000)020[0616:COWAPC]2.0.CO;2
SSID ssj0016206
Score 2.2850962
Snippet A low rate of establishment in brown mosses is generally observed following large-scale restoration of fens. As brown mosses are important components in peat...
SourceID proquest
crossref
bioone
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 23
SubjectTerms Amblystegiaceae
Aulacomniaceae
bryophyte biology
Calliergonaceae
fens
fertilization
fragmentation
frost
liming
mosses and liverworts
nutrient availability
peat
phosphates
water table
Title Towards the regeneration of brown mosses for fen restoration
URI http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1639/0007-2745-125.1.023
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2661052818
Volume 125
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaWLQcuiKcoLxmJE-CycR5OJC67QFUhyoVW6i2yHRuBSoK2m0P5U_xFZmzHyYqqarlEK-_ayc58Gc94XoS8tEJqpUXGJJeCZbopmBRVzgArQliVq8wliR1-KQ6Os08n-cls9mcStdRv1J7-fWFeyf9wFcaAr5glew3OxkVhAD4Df-EKHIbr1XjsYl7PfJggmP9YQXrQABXa169_dujUdbGE1mDmCgZDjsz4MWJltT7vxnQgxwODeYK9b8zlHeqw52EZ1hi007vhZeu_ZSiqQ7bHoR86Dd25PXK-rb2P_6tsm_XEoQ9EDVH8Dpgm-KrCYQTn7jBiPIyMXqbhmYeCB58xrrWNQyEidUswCwYGsndwGy-LK5DFWeo7_ERh7dOkt1AZRG862cR9CZR_tgdQx3w8pb8Zg9X2sGZrOu6GMUbx0t_fIDsc7BI-JzvL1YfVfnRcFdy1c41TQqErWOjtBcuA2qO-d11rtrWibaXAaTpHd8jtYKLQpcfbXTIz7T1yc9WBGXF-n7wLoKMAOjoFHe0sdaCjHnQUQEcBdHQCugfkeP_j0fsDFlpwMMXzbMOkhhcXdNjK2oRr9AmbplhY3uQ6acrSlKoslFiUNsH-KbLhWpdNWpiqLFWRSJE-JPMW_t8jQqVMU5FaWTW4SqYlX2hUZtEIzprE7pJXnhb1L19npUb7FAiH8RGiRsLVQLg6qWHGLuEDvWoditljT5XTyye9iZOudI8XAyNqkLnoSJOt6fqzGpXaRY511B5f56GfkFvjO_OUzDfr3jwDlXajngcY_QWjmJVN
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards+the+regeneration+of+brown+mosses+for+fen+restoration&rft.jtitle=The+Bryologist&rft.au=Meilleur%2C+S%C3%A9bastien&rft.au=Gu%C3%AAn%C3%A9-Nanchen%2C+M%C3%A9lina&rft.au=Hugron%2C+Sandrine&rft.au=Fenton%2C+Nicole+J&rft.date=2022-01-04&rft.pub=American+Bryological+and+Lichenological+Society&rft.issn=0007-2745&rft.eissn=1938-4378&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=35&rft_id=info:doi/10.1639%2F0007-2745-125.1.023&rft.externalDocID=10.1639%2F0007-2745-125.1.023
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0007-2745&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0007-2745&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0007-2745&client=summon