AB0080 IMBALANCE OF MONOCYTE/MACROPHAGE POLARIZATION IN PERIPHERAL BLOOD AND SYNOVIAL FLUID OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS
BackgroundMacrophages strongly contribute to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), initiating the inflammatory response, the join damage, but also may promote the resolution of inflammation and the restoration of tissue immune-homeostasis [1,2]. This seems to be related to an unbalanced imm...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 82; no. Suppl 1; pp. 1218 - 1219 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Kidlington
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism
01.06.2023
Elsevier B.V Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
DOI | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2023-eular.5792 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | BackgroundMacrophages strongly contribute to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), initiating the inflammatory response, the join damage, but also may promote the resolution of inflammation and the restoration of tissue immune-homeostasis [1,2]. This seems to be related to an unbalanced immunological response mediated by macrophages through their polarization into “classically” and “alternatively” activated phenotypes (M1 or M2) [3,4]. However, little is known about the M1 and M2 phenotype of their circulating precursors (monocytes) in the peripheral blood (PB) and the synovial fluid (SF) of RA patients.ObjectivesTo characterise the polarization status (M1 and M2) of PB and SF monocytes of RA patients together with their distribution in the monocyte subsets by flow cytometry (FC).MethodsNineteen RA patients not yet treated with biological DMARDs (mean age 62±14 years), who fulfilled the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA and treated in accordance with EULAR recommendation, as well as 19 age-matched healthy subjects (HSs) were enrolled after signed informed consent. PB and SF cells were collected from each RA patient, whereas only PB cells were collected from HSs.The expression of CD14 and CD16 surface markers allowed to identify the monocyte population and the monocyte subsets: “classical”(CD14++CD16-), “intermediate”(CD14++CD16+), and “non-classical”(CD14-CD16+).The M1 phenotype (M1 monocytes) was identified by the evaluation of CD80, CD86, TLR2 and TLR4, whereas the M2 phenotype (M2 monocytes) was identified evaluating CD204, CD163 and CD206 surface markers.Results were expressed as percentage of positive cells over total leukocytes from PB and SF. Statistical analysis was carried out by Mann-Whitney non-parametric test.ResultsIn RA patients, the percentage of CD14++CD16+monocytes was significantly higher in PB compared to that in HS (p<0.001), and it was higher in SF compared to PB (p<0.05). The percentage of CD14-CD16+monocytes was significantly increased in RA-PB compared to HS-PB and RA-SF (p<0.01; p<0.05).RA patients were characterized by an increased percentage of M1 monocytes (CD80+CD86+TLR2+TLR4+CD204-CD163-CD206-cells) in PB compared to HSs and compared to RA-SF.The percentage of M2 monocytes (CD204+CD163+CD206+CD80-CD86-TLR2-TLR4-cells) was also increased in RA-PB compared to HS-PB and to RA-SF, but this increase was lower and not significant than that observed for M1 monocytes. Moreover, the M1-M2 monocyte ratio was 8:1in RA-PB.Therefore, in RA patients, circulating M1 monocytes belonged to the “non-classical” subset, whereas M2 monocytes belonged to the “classical” subset.The percentage of circulating mixed M1/M2 monocytes (CD80+CD86+TLR2+TLR4+CD204+CD163+CD206+cells) was higher in RA patients compared to HSs. Moreover, in RA patients, the percentage of these cells was higher in SF than in PB and they primarily belonged to the “intermediate” monocyte subset. Interestingly, the highest percentage of M2 and mixed M1/M2 monocytes was observed in PB and SF of RA patients receiving a higher daily (25mg) and cumulative glucocorticoid dosages.ConclusionThe results confirm that RA is an immune-inflammatory disease mainly mediated by both M1 monocytes and macrophages, as demonstrated by the increase in the percentage of circulating M1 monocytes. Glucocorticoids might contribute to the M1 to M2 transition, which characterizes RA patients under remission by increasing mixed M1/M2 and M2 monocyte percentage.References[1]Okabe Y et al. Nat Immunol. 2016;17:9–17.[2]Kurowska-Stolarska M, et al. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022;18:384-97.[3]Cutolo M, et al. Front Immunol. 2022;13:867260.[4]Ross EA, et al. Front Immunol. 2021;12:708186.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsStefano Soldano: None declared, Emanuele Gotelli: None declared, Paola Montagna: None declared, Rosanna Campitiello: None declared, Alberto Sulli: None declared, Vanessa Smith: None declared, Maurizio Cutolo Grant/research support from: BMS, Boehringer, Amgen. |
---|---|
AbstractList | BackgroundMacrophages strongly contribute to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), initiating the inflammatory response, the join damage, but also may promote the resolution of inflammation and the restoration of tissue immune-homeostasis [1,2]. This seems to be related to an unbalanced immunological response mediated by macrophages through their polarization into “classically” and “alternatively” activated phenotypes (M1 or M2) [3,4]. However, little is known about the M1 and M2 phenotype of their circulating precursors (monocytes) in the peripheral blood (PB) and the synovial fluid (SF) of RA patients.ObjectivesTo characterise the polarization status (M1 and M2) of PB and SF monocytes of RA patients together with their distribution in the monocyte subsets by flow cytometry (FC).MethodsNineteen RA patients not yet treated with biological DMARDs (mean age 62±14 years), who fulfilled the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA and treated in accordance with EULAR recommendation, as well as 19 age-matched healthy subjects (HSs) were enrolled after signed informed consent. PB and SF cells were collected from each RA patient, whereas only PB cells were collected from HSs.The expression of CD14 and CD16 surface markers allowed to identify the monocyte population and the monocyte subsets: “classical”(CD14++CD16-), “intermediate”(CD14++CD16+), and “non-classical”(CD14-CD16+).The M1 phenotype (M1 monocytes) was identified by the evaluation of CD80, CD86, TLR2 and TLR4, whereas the M2 phenotype (M2 monocytes) was identified evaluating CD204, CD163 and CD206 surface markers.Results were expressed as percentage of positive cells over total leukocytes from PB and SF. Statistical analysis was carried out by Mann-Whitney non-parametric test.ResultsIn RA patients, the percentage of CD14++CD16+monocytes was significantly higher in PB compared to that in HS (p<0.001), and it was higher in SF compared to PB (p<0.05). The percentage of CD14-CD16+monocytes was significantly increased in RA-PB compared to HS-PB and RA-SF (p<0.01; p<0.05).RA patients were characterized by an increased percentage of M1 monocytes (CD80+CD86+TLR2+TLR4+CD204-CD163-CD206-cells) in PB compared to HSs and compared to RA-SF.The percentage of M2 monocytes (CD204+CD163+CD206+CD80-CD86-TLR2-TLR4-cells) was also increased in RA-PB compared to HS-PB and to RA-SF, but this increase was lower and not significant than that observed for M1 monocytes. Moreover, the M1-M2 monocyte ratio was 8:1in RA-PB.Therefore, in RA patients, circulating M1 monocytes belonged to the “non-classical” subset, whereas M2 monocytes belonged to the “classical” subset.The percentage of circulating mixed M1/M2 monocytes (CD80+CD86+TLR2+TLR4+CD204+CD163+CD206+cells) was higher in RA patients compared to HSs. Moreover, in RA patients, the percentage of these cells was higher in SF than in PB and they primarily belonged to the “intermediate” monocyte subset. Interestingly, the highest percentage of M2 and mixed M1/M2 monocytes was observed in PB and SF of RA patients receiving a higher daily (25mg) and cumulative glucocorticoid dosages.ConclusionThe results confirm that RA is an immune-inflammatory disease mainly mediated by both M1 monocytes and macrophages, as demonstrated by the increase in the percentage of circulating M1 monocytes. Glucocorticoids might contribute to the M1 to M2 transition, which characterizes RA patients under remission by increasing mixed M1/M2 and M2 monocyte percentage.References[1]Okabe Y et al. Nat Immunol. 2016;17:9–17.[2]Kurowska-Stolarska M, et al. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022;18:384-97.[3]Cutolo M, et al. Front Immunol. 2022;13:867260.[4]Ross EA, et al. Front Immunol. 2021;12:708186.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsStefano Soldano: None declared, Emanuele Gotelli: None declared, Paola Montagna: None declared, Rosanna Campitiello: None declared, Alberto Sulli: None declared, Vanessa Smith: None declared, Maurizio Cutolo Grant/research support from: BMS, Boehringer, Amgen. Macrophages strongly contribute to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), initiating the inflammatory response, the join damage, but also may promote the resolution of inflammation and the restoration of tissue immune-homeostasis [1,2]. This seems to be related to an unbalanced immunological response mediated by macrophages through their polarization into “classically” and “alternatively” activated phenotypes (M1 or M2) [3,4]. However, little is known about the M1 and M2 phenotype of their circulating precursors (monocytes) in the peripheral blood (PB) and the synovial fluid (SF) of RA patients. To characterise the polarization status (M1 and M2) of PB and SF monocytes of RA patients together with their distribution in the monocyte subsets by flow cytometry (FC). Nineteen RA patients not yet treated with biological DMARDs (mean age 62±14 years), who fulfilled the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA and treated in accordance with EULAR recommendation, as well as 19 age-matched healthy subjects (HSs) were enrolled after signed informed consent. PB and SF cells were collected from each RA patient, whereas only PB cells were collected from HSs. The expression of CD14 and CD16 surface markers allowed to identify the monocyte population and the monocyte subsets: “classical”(CD14++CD16-), “intermediate”(CD14++CD16+), and “non-classical”(CD14-CD16+). The M1 phenotype (M1 monocytes) was identified by the evaluation of CD80, CD86, TLR2 and TLR4, whereas the M2 phenotype (M2 monocytes) was identified evaluating CD204, CD163 and CD206 surface markers. Results were expressed as percentage of positive cells over total leukocytes from PB and SF. Statistical analysis was carried out by Mann-Whitney non-parametric test. In RA patients, the percentage of CD14++CD16+monocytes was significantly higher in PB compared to that in HS (p<0.001), and it was higher in SF compared to PB (p<0.05). The percentage of CD14-CD16+monocytes was significantly increased in RA-PB compared to HS-PB and RA-SF (p<0.01; p<0.05). RA patients were characterized by an increased percentage of M1 monocytes (CD80+CD86+TLR2+TLR4+CD204-CD163-CD206-cells) in PB compared to HSs and compared to RA-SF. The percentage of M2 monocytes (CD204+CD163+CD206+CD80-CD86-TLR2-TLR4-cells) was also increased in RA-PB compared to HS-PB and to RA-SF, but this increase was lower and not significant than that observed for M1 monocytes. Moreover, the M1-M2 monocyte ratio was 8:1in RA-PB. Therefore, in RA patients, circulating M1 monocytes belonged to the “non-classical” subset, whereas M2 monocytes belonged to the “classical” subset. The percentage of circulating mixed M1/M2 monocytes (CD80+CD86+TLR2+TLR4+CD204+CD163+CD206+cells) was higher in RA patients compared to HSs. Moreover, in RA patients, the percentage of these cells was higher in SF than in PB and they primarily belonged to the “intermediate” monocyte subset. Interestingly, the highest percentage of M2 and mixed M1/M2 monocytes was observed in PB and SF of RA patients receiving a higher daily (25mg) and cumulative glucocorticoid dosages. The results confirm that RA is an immune-inflammatory disease mainly mediated by both M1 monocytes and macrophages, as demonstrated by the increase in the percentage of circulating M1 monocytes. Glucocorticoids might contribute to the M1 to M2 transition, which characterizes RA patients under remission by increasing mixed M1/M2 and M2 monocyte percentage. [1]Okabe Y et al. Nat Immunol. 2016;17:9–17. [2]Kurowska-Stolarska M, et al. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022;18:384-97. [3]Cutolo M, et al. Front Immunol. 2022;13:867260. [4]Ross EA, et al. Front Immunol. 2021;12:708186. NIL. Stefano Soldano: None declared, Emanuele Gotelli: None declared, Paola Montagna: None declared, Rosanna Campitiello: None declared, Alberto Sulli: None declared, Vanessa Smith: None declared, Maurizio Cutolo Grant/research support from: BMS, Boehringer, Amgen. |
Author | Smith, V. Cutolo, M. Campitiello, R. Soldano, S. Gotelli, E. Sulli, A. Montagna, P. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: S. surname: Soldano fullname: Soldano, S. organization: University of Genova, IRCCS Polyclinic San Martino Hospital, Laboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Genoa, Italy – sequence: 2 givenname: E. surname: Gotelli fullname: Gotelli, E. organization: University of Genova, IRCCS Polyclinic San Martino Hospital, Laboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Genoa, Italy – sequence: 3 givenname: P. surname: Montagna fullname: Montagna, P. organization: University of Genova, IRCCS Polyclinic San Martino Hospital, Laboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Genoa, Italy – sequence: 4 givenname: R. surname: Campitiello fullname: Campitiello, R. organization: University of Genova, IRCCS Polyclinic San Martino Hospital, Laboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Genoa, Italy – sequence: 5 givenname: A. surname: Sulli fullname: Sulli, A. organization: University of Genova, IRCCS Polyclinic San Martino Hospital, Laboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Genoa, Italy – sequence: 6 givenname: V. surname: Smith fullname: Smith, V. – sequence: 7 givenname: M. surname: Cutolo fullname: Cutolo, M. organization: University of Genova, IRCCS Polyclinic San Martino Hospital, Laboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Genoa, Italy |
BookMark | eNqNkMtq3DAUhkVJoZO07yDI2okuvomuNB5NLPBYxuMppBvhi0w9ZOxUzgS6Kd30RfMk0XQK7TIr6RzO_x3puwQX4zQaAK4xusGYhrf1ONpv5njohtkjiFDPHB9qexNEjLwDC-yHsWuH6AIsEELU81kYfQCX87x3JYpxvAA_-dLd0Muv33Kz5BnPEwHVGm5UrpL7StxueFKqIuV3AhYq46X8yiupcihzWIhSFqkoeQaXmVIryPMV3N7n6ot0rXW2k6sTqkzFbsMr5SpeVmkpK7mFhaOIvNp-BO_7-mE2n_6eV2C3FlWSepm6kwnPvIb4lHgkIAQ3YRe0fU96P8DGxyzoaY8YY8bvTIyDJq5xGMWxT2jL_CamTRBRGja0ixi9Atdn7qOdvh_N_KT309GObqUmMSGIRoQFburzeaq10zxb0-tHOxxq-0NjpE_C9X_C9Um4_iNcn4S7tDinjfvI82CsntvBjK3pBmvaJ91Nwxs50ZnTHPb_nvmW5CsNP5yy |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2023 © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. – notice: 2023 © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by Elsevier Inc. – notice: 2023 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION K9. |
DOI | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2023-eular.5792 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1468-2060 |
EndPage | 1219 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1136_annrheumdis_2023_eular_5792 S0003496724651034 annrheumdis |
GroupedDBID | --- .55 .GJ .VT 169 23M 2WC 39C 3O- 4.4 40O 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 7X7 7~S 88E 88I 8AF 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8R4 8R5 AAHLL AAKAS AAOJX AAWJN AAWTL AAXUO ABAAH ABJNI ABKDF ABMQD ABOCM ABTFR ABUWG ABVAJ ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACGTL ACHTP ACMFJ ACOAB ACOFX ACPRK ACQSR ACTZY ADBBV ADCEG ADFRT ADUGQ ADZCM AEKJL AENEX AFKRA AFWFF AGQPQ AHMBA AHNKE AHQMW AJYBZ AKKEP ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN AZQEC BAWUL BBNVY BENPR BHPHI BKNYI BLJBA BOMFT BPHCQ BTFSW BTHHO BVXVI C1A C45 CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CXRWF DIK DWQXO E3Z EBS EJD F5P FDB FYUFA GNUQQ H13 HAJ HCIFZ HMCUK HYE HZ~ IAO IEA IHR INH INR IOF ITC J5H K9- KQ8 L7B LK8 M0R M1P M2P M7P N9A NTWIH NXWIF O9- OK1 OVD P2P PHGZT PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q2X R53 RHI RMJ RPM RV8 RWL RXW TAE TEORI TR2 UAW UKHRP UYXKK V24 VM9 VVN W2D W8F WH7 WOQ X6Y X7M YFH YOC YQY ZGI ZXP 0R~ AAFWJ AALRI AAYXX CITATION PHGZM K9. PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-b2432-25221b6d5cff2f451e4195f3f0999e4de815b8a16788423c94b83b57336b3d793 |
ISSN | 0003-4967 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 25 11:09:27 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 05:23:29 EDT 2025 Sun Apr 06 06:54:35 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:49:59 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | Suppl 1 |
Keywords | Innate immunity Rheumatoid arthritis |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b2432-25221b6d5cff2f451e4195f3f0999e4de815b8a16788423c94b83b57336b3d793 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
OpenAccessLink | https://ard.bmj.com/content/annrheumdis/82/Suppl_1/1218.2.full.pdf |
PQID | 2822037295 |
PQPubID | 2041045 |
PageCount | 2 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_2822037295 crossref_primary_10_1136_annrheumdis_2023_eular_5792 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1136_annrheumdis_2023_eular_5792 bmj_journals_10_1136_annrheumdis_2023_eular_5792 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-June June 2023 2023-06-00 20230601 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2023 text: 2023-June |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Kidlington |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Kidlington |
PublicationTitle | Annals of the rheumatic diseases |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Ann Rheum Dis |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism Elsevier B.V Elsevier Limited |
Publisher_xml | – name: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism – name: Elsevier B.V – name: Elsevier Limited |
SSID | ssj0000818 |
Score | 2.4173028 |
Snippet | BackgroundMacrophages strongly contribute to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), initiating the inflammatory response, the join damage, but also may... Macrophages strongly contribute to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), initiating the inflammatory response, the join damage, but also may promote... |
SourceID | proquest crossref elsevier bmj |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 1218 |
SubjectTerms | CD14 antigen CD16 antigen CD163 antigen CD80 antigen CD86 antigen Flow cytometry Genotype & phenotype Glucocorticoids Hemopoiesis Homeostasis Immune response Inflammatory diseases Innate immunity Leukocytes Macrophages Monocytes Peripheral blood Phenotypes Polarization Remission Rheumatoid arthritis Scientific Abstracts Statistical analysis Surface markers Synovial fluid TLR2 protein TLR4 protein Toll-like receptors |
Title | AB0080 IMBALANCE OF MONOCYTE/MACROPHAGE POLARIZATION IN PERIPHERAL BLOOD AND SYNOVIAL FLUID OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS |
URI | https://ard.bmj.com/content/82/Suppl_1/1218.2.full https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2023-eular.5792 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2822037295 |
Volume | 82 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9MwGLbKJk1cEJ9iMCZLcKvSNY6zJhek9IsE2iRKU9RxieLEGUKsnaC9cEBc-Ff8Gn4Jr-2kyWBMhUvUuK2T-HliP7bfD4RekMwsYNqRajD4dDVKGYd3jnCtaxWpQXNmG6lwcJ76p-6cvl6Yi1brR8NqabNmnezLtX4l_4MqlAGuwkv2H5DdVgoF8BnwhSMgDMedMHb6QoqV9gqW6U37jkw2I0x5oK8MBmfxCGqfOoMoCF25dxRMnMh7p3LteH47hHlc6ArjtXZ_EgRDGW1qduYHbz0oGk_m3lBUFrmj-dSJAzgDAexGXuzN2iHUMvLjWVPf1vGYpenie75RIWHLfaCtgJ-tPuapzPpdr72-WsnooFfcI6DLWafnym-tzo2cXlyKQLDltlHUXLkgRm1hpZbTKpeaP125hMEctVWejg5XPbNwESNdlXyg6rot0qCoTIPa1hu9sU7Kvp1Xp_b1o4ZRhkuWzQItosnb5cIQuGP2VLK-q7G6XWeWhMNxMvH8N7fQPoFJikgc0lv0ah1g6VaVr1E8zAF6Xl7s5IZLgcZhFx_-ppJ-0wtSBMV30Z1y9oIdRcV7qMWX99HBtLTPeIC-Kkb-_PZ9y0UcjHHFxZOaibjJROz5uGYilkzEwERcMRFLJoqqaibiLRNxxcSHaD4exQNXKzN8aIxQg2gE1L_OTnMzKwpSUFPnVLfNwijEvIXTnFu6yaxUB0Vlge7PbMosg8kQnszIYWh5hPaWqyV_jHABv9UZtLNRpNSyc6bnuW6x3Ey5bZMsPURdaNekfHs_J3Lya0iH_AqKRECRSCgSAcUhohUIyaWK_bLb315WgCWljFXyNAG-7VbBUQVzfb_C3Lsr9tjNJzd__RTdrl-2I7S3_rThz0A4r9mx5Ocx2u-P_DD6BTr1tAw |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AB0080%E2%80%85IMBALANCE+OF+MONOCYTE%2FMACROPHAGE+POLARIZATION+IN+PERIPHERAL+BLOOD+AND+SYNOVIAL+FLUID+OF+RHEUMATOID+ARTHRITIS+PATIENTS&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+the+rheumatic+diseases&rft.au=Soldano%2C+S&rft.au=Gotelli%2C+E&rft.au=Montagna%2C+P&rft.au=Campitiello%2C+R&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Limited&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=Suppl+1&rft.spage=1218&rft.epage=1219&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136%2Fannrheumdis-2023-eular.5792&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0003-4967&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0003-4967&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0003-4967&client=summon |