A cytological and molecular analysis of D-genome chromosome retention following F2–F6 generations of hexaploid × tetraploid wheat crosses

Both hexaploid bread wheat (AABBDD) (Triticum aestivum L.) and tetraploid durum wheat (AABB) (T. turgidum spp. durum) are highly significant global food crops. Crossing these two wheats with different ploidy levels results in pentaploid (AABBD) F1 lines. This study investigated the differences in th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCrop and pasture science Vol. 69; no. 2; pp. 121 - 130
Main Authors Padmanaban, Sriram, Zhang, Peng, Sutherland, Mark W, Knight, Noel L, Martin, Anke
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published CSIRO Publishing 01.02.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Both hexaploid bread wheat (AABBDD) (Triticum aestivum L.) and tetraploid durum wheat (AABB) (T. turgidum spp. durum) are highly significant global food crops. Crossing these two wheats with different ploidy levels results in pentaploid (AABBD) F1 lines. This study investigated the differences in the retention of D chromosomes between different hexaploid × tetraploid crosses in subsequent generations by using molecular and cytological techniques. Significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed in the retention of D chromosomes in the F2 generation depending on the parents of the original cross. One of the crosses, 2WE25 × 950329, retained at least one copy of each D chromosome in 48% of its F2 lines. For this cross, the retention or elimination of D chromosomes was determined through several subsequent self-fertilised generations. Cytological analysis indicated that D chromosomes were still being eliminated at the F5 generation, suggesting that in some hexaploid × tetraploid crosses, D chromosomes are unstable for many generations. This study provides information on the variation in D chromosome retention in different hexaploid × tetraploid wheat crosses and suggests efficient strategies for utilising D genome retention or elimination to improve bread and durum wheat, respectively.
AbstractList Both hexaploid bread wheat (AABBDD) (Triticum aestivum L.) and tetraploid durum wheat (AABB) (T. turgidum spp. durum) are highly significant global food crops. Crossing these two wheats with different ploidy levels results in pentaploid (AABBD) F1 lines. This study investigated the differences in the retention of D chromosomes between different hexaploid × tetraploid crosses in subsequent generations by using molecular and cytological techniques. Significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed in the retention of D chromosomes in the F2 generation depending on the parents of the original cross. One of the crosses, 2WE25 × 950329, retained at least one copy of each D chromosome in 48% of its F2 lines. For this cross, the retention or elimination of D chromosomes was determined through several subsequent self-fertilised generations. Cytological analysis indicated that D chromosomes were still being eliminated at the F5 generation, suggesting that in some hexaploid × tetraploid crosses, D chromosomes are unstable for many generations. This study provides information on the variation in D chromosome retention in different hexaploid × tetraploid wheat crosses and suggests efficient strategies for utilising D genome retention or elimination to improve bread and durum wheat, respectively.
Both hexaploid bread wheat (AABBDD) (Triticum aestivum L.) and tetraploid durum wheat (AABB) (T. turgidum spp. durum) are highly significant global food crops. Crossing these two wheats with different ploidy levels results in pentaploid (AABBD) F₁ lines. This study investigated the differences in the retention of D chromosomes between different hexaploid × tetraploid crosses in subsequent generations by using molecular and cytological techniques. Significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed in the retention of D chromosomes in the F₂ generation depending on the parents of the original cross. One of the crosses, 2WE25 × 950329, retained at least one copy of each D chromosome in 48% of its F₂ lines. For this cross, the retention or elimination of D chromosomes was determined through several subsequent self-fertilised generations. Cytological analysis indicated that D chromosomes were still being eliminated at the F₅ generation, suggesting that in some hexaploid × tetraploid crosses, D chromosomes are unstable for many generations. This study provides information on the variation in D chromosome retention in different hexaploid × tetraploid wheat crosses and suggests efficient strategies for utilising D genome retention or elimination to improve bread and durum wheat, respectively.
Author Padmanaban, Sriram
Zhang, Peng
Martin, Anke
Sutherland, Mark W
Knight, Noel L
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sriram
  surname: Padmanaban
  fullname: Padmanaban, Sriram
  organization: Centre for Crop Health, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Peng
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Peng
  organization: Plant Breeding Institute, The University of Sydney, Cobbitty, NSW 2570, Australia
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Mark W
  surname: Sutherland
  fullname: Sutherland, Mark W
  organization: Centre for Crop Health, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Noel L
  surname: Knight
  fullname: Knight, Noel L
  organization: Present address: School of Integrative Plant Science, Plant Pathology and Plant–Microbe Biology Section, Cornell University, Geneva, NY 14456, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Anke
  surname: Martin
  fullname: Martin, Anke
  organization: Centre for Crop Health, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
BookMark eNp1kblOJDEQhi0EEqd4BSeITXpx9eVxiGZ3dpGQIIC45bbLM0bu9mB7xE5GSoa0AQ_Em_Ak9BwR2k3qcH1VKv91SHZ73yMhp8C-A-NwMb4FnpdshxzAqKiziotqdxszUfJ9chjjA2N1WUF9QF4vqVom7_zUKumo7DXtvEO1cDIMmXTLaCP1hv7Iptj7DqmaBd_5uAoDJuyT9T013jn_ZPspneQfz38nNR1oDHJVXLfP8I-cO2_1x_PL-9tgEqaweaFPM5SJquBjxHhM9ox0EU-2_ojcT37ejX9n1ze_rsaX11mbsyJlI4l6xNvKaAG8FUWrZC0U52ig1FrnOZi2HVVoKtQlMBAtFFzLwtRVXhZCF0fk22buPPjHBcbUdDYqdE726BexyQFqAQCiHtDzDbpeMaBp5sF2MiwbYM1K82ar-UBmX0hl01qE4bPW_YM_2_Ct9cMV_zv3E2hPlvg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2018_01149
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11032_018_0838_6
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2022_883868
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00122_019_03299_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cj_2024_12_010
Cites_doi 10.1007/s10681-013-0890-6
10.1007/s00122-010-1296-7
10.1007/s00122-012-1998-0
10.1139/g04-042
10.1139/g93-067
10.1038/hdy.2012.116
10.2135/cropsci2007.06.0334
10.1007/s11032-017-0647-3
10.1073/pnas.81.24.8014
10.3389/fpls.2017.00358
10.1007/BF00036860
10.1023/A:1004065620127
10.1038/hdy.2011.17
10.1017/S0016672300010569
10.1007/s00438-015-0997-7
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087847
10.1071/CP10131
10.1007/BF02732107
10.1007/s00122-015-2548-3
10.1371/journal.pone.0137747
10.1007/s00122-002-1070-6
10.1007/s13313-014-0333-4
10.1071/AR99057
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright CSIRO 2018
Copyright_xml – notice: CSIRO 2018
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1071/CP17240
DatabaseName CrossRef
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef
AGRICOLA
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
EISSN 1836-5795
EndPage 130
ExternalDocumentID 10_1071_CP17240
GroupedDBID 29F
4.4
AACFU
AAPBV
AAPSS
ABDBF
AEDJY
AENEX
AKPMI
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
EBS
EJD
MV1
NGGKN
PQ0
RBO
RCO
0R~
AAHBH
AAYXX
ACUHS
AEIBA
AFNWH
CITATION
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-b203t-8aed87b5fd917b93bca69c77ef14ddd221fbb85ef5ed41019b137da3f652439d3
ISSN 1836-0947
1836-5795
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 19:00:23 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:07:13 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:59:19 EDT 2025
Thu Nov 04 13:51:09 EDT 2021
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b203t-8aed87b5fd917b93bca69c77ef14ddd221fbb85ef5ed41019b137da3f652439d3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PQID 2116911196
PQPubID 24069
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2116911196
crossref_primary_10_1071_CP17240
crossref_citationtrail_10_1071_CP17240
bioone_primary_10_1071_CP17240
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20180201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2018
  text: 20180201
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Crop and pasture science
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher CSIRO Publishing
Publisher_xml – name: CSIRO Publishing
References Martin (CP17240R11) 2011; 107
Sheedy (CP17240R23) 2015; 44
Padmanaban (CP17240R16) 2017; 8
King (CP17240R7) 2013; 110
Lanning (CP17240R9) 2008; 48
Kalous (CP17240R4) 2015; 128
CP17240R22
Lim (CP17240R10) 2003; 106
Padmanaban (CP17240R15) 2017; 37
Ren (CP17240R18) 2015; 290
Riley (CP17240R19) 1967; 9
Bovill (CP17240R1) 2010; 121
Zhang (CP17240R26) 2004; 47
Koo (CP17240R8) 2015; 10
Martin (CP17240R12) 2013; 192
Mukai (CP17240R13) 1993; 36
Rayburn (CP17240R17) 1986; 4
Wang (CP17240R24) 2005; 46
Gilbert (CP17240R3) 2000; 114
Saghai-Maroof (CP17240R20) 1984; 81
Schwarzacher (CP17240R21) 1989; 64
Xu (CP17240R25) 2013; 126
Eberhard (CP17240R2) 2010; 61
Munns (CP17240R14) 2000; 51
References_xml – volume: 192
  start-page: 463
  year: 2013
  ident: CP17240R12
  publication-title: Euphytica
  doi: 10.1007/s10681-013-0890-6
– volume: 46
  start-page: 365
  year: 2005
  ident: CP17240R24
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Genetics
– volume: 121
  start-page: 127
  year: 2010
  ident: CP17240R1
  publication-title: Theoretical and Applied Genetics
  doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1296-7
– volume: 126
  start-page: 523
  year: 2013
  ident: CP17240R25
  publication-title: Theoretical and Applied Genetics
  doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1998-0
– volume: 47
  start-page: 979
  year: 2004
  ident: CP17240R26
  publication-title: Genome
  doi: 10.1139/g04-042
– volume: 36
  start-page: 489
  year: 1993
  ident: CP17240R13
  publication-title: Genome
  doi: 10.1139/g93-067
– volume: 110
  start-page: 475
  year: 2013
  ident: CP17240R7
  publication-title: Heredity
  doi: 10.1038/hdy.2012.116
– volume: 48
  start-page: 199
  year: 2008
  ident: CP17240R9
  publication-title: Crop Science
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci2007.06.0334
– volume: 37
  start-page: 48
  year: 2017
  ident: CP17240R15
  publication-title: Molecular Breeding
  doi: 10.1007/s11032-017-0647-3
– volume: 81
  start-page: 8014
  year: 1984
  ident: CP17240R20
  publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.24.8014
– volume: 8
  start-page: 358
  year: 2017
  ident: CP17240R16
  publication-title: Frontiers in Plant Science
  doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00358
– ident: CP17240R22
  doi: 10.1007/BF00036860
– volume: 114
  start-page: 181
  year: 2000
  ident: CP17240R3
  publication-title: Euphytica
  doi: 10.1023/A:1004065620127
– volume: 107
  start-page: 315
  year: 2011
  ident: CP17240R11
  publication-title: Heredity
  doi: 10.1038/hdy.2011.17
– volume: 9
  start-page: 259
  year: 1967
  ident: CP17240R19
  publication-title: Genetical Research
  doi: 10.1017/S0016672300010569
– volume: 290
  start-page: 1457
  year: 2015
  ident: CP17240R18
  publication-title: Molecular Genetics and Genomics
  doi: 10.1007/s00438-015-0997-7
– volume: 64
  start-page: 315
  year: 1989
  ident: CP17240R21
  publication-title: Annals of Botany
  doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087847
– volume: 61
  start-page: 619
  year: 2010
  ident: CP17240R2
  publication-title: Crop & Pasture Science
  doi: 10.1071/CP10131
– volume: 4
  start-page: 102
  year: 1986
  ident: CP17240R17
  publication-title: Plant Molecular Biology Reporter
  doi: 10.1007/BF02732107
– volume: 128
  start-page: 1799
  year: 2015
  ident: CP17240R4
  publication-title: Theoretical and Applied Genetics
  doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2548-3
– volume: 10
  start-page: e0137747
  year: 2015
  ident: CP17240R8
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137747
– volume: 106
  start-page: 568
  year: 2003
  ident: CP17240R10
  publication-title: Theoretical and Applied Genetics
  doi: 10.1007/s00122-002-1070-6
– volume: 44
  start-page: 175
  year: 2015
  ident: CP17240R23
  publication-title: Australasian Plant Pathology
  doi: 10.1007/s13313-014-0333-4
– volume: 51
  start-page: 69
  year: 2000
  ident: CP17240R14
  publication-title: Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
  doi: 10.1071/AR99057
SSID ssj0064516
Score 2.1929483
Snippet Both hexaploid bread wheat (AABBDD) (Triticum aestivum L.) and tetraploid durum wheat (AABB) (T. turgidum spp. durum) are highly significant global food crops....
SourceID proquest
crossref
bioone
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 121
SubjectTerms breads
chromosomes
crossing
DArTseq
durum wheat
FISH
food crops
genome
GISH
hexaploidy
interploidy crosses
parents
pentaploidy
RESEARCH PAPERS
tetraploidy
Triticum aestivum
Title A cytological and molecular analysis of D-genome chromosome retention following F2–F6 generations of hexaploid × tetraploid wheat crosses
URI http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1071/CP17240
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2116911196
Volume 69
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9MwGLZKd4ED4lNswGQkxCUKzHZiJ8eOLZrQGDu00m5R_BE2qW2qNNWA067ckDjwC_gl_JP9EuzYTlsVpMElSlLXav0-8vv6_XheAF7KhDJaChqyNCFhJFEcFgpFISGiVASXgmBTjfz-hB6Nondn8Vmv93Mla2nR8Nfiyx_rSv5Hqvqdlqupkv0HyXaT6hf6XstXX7WE9fVGMh4E4nPT7V7GBT7x3W7105Jt5CA0VKwTFYhzk303N7e1sZZdouF4XF0al0GGfe4DyahprqzqZabcufpUzMaV_pN2TJKaIHvKusdGNbUdEVyaLT5oNbDLUfRkCHU1s9wExbyNXTgNvIxkSZNPy51btr6oi8mGb_tUOXXbBrN8wbKvPAo6r5FlSbHRKTV29RXOw4ESnxTdbcoJoWHMbDNOv2vbBi8OnTiYGZqMELkYj92Mka29dnrdfbahMrSNZaiIT7UlZ4mj1km5Tz7k2ej4OB8eng1vgS2sTyO4D7YG-wf7mVf51HQ7Nid7_0NtdbaZ-o2bWBs4_KKqpmrd_llX_61NM7wH7rrDCBxYZN0HPTV9AO4MPtaOkEU9BN8GcAVjUK8z7DAGPcZgVUKPMbjEGOwwBjuMwQxfX33PKFxBl_l6h67rq6-_fujLEk2wRRN0aHoERtnh8O1R6Lp4hBzvkSZMCiUTxuNSpojxlHBR0FQwpkoUSSkxRiXnSazKWMlIK4iUI8JkQUoaY20tS_IY9Kd64Z4AGEnBRKRtriSJo0hQvqeE4bvDVLBCcLwNdu0i5zNL1ZK3KRYM5U4K2-CVX_xcOA5804plvDkQdgP_OtcLL71cb8kmzlZMVbWY5xgZBiqkddvODcY8BbeXoH8G-k29UM-1odvwXQez38RSr3Q
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+cytological+and+molecular+analysis+of+D-genome+chromosome+retention+following+F2%E2%80%93F6+generations+of+hexaploid%E2%80%89%C3%97%E2%80%89tetraploid+wheat+crosses&rft.jtitle=Crop+and+pasture+science&rft.au=Padmanaban%2C+Sriram&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Peng&rft.au=Sutherland%2C+Mark+W&rft.au=Knight%2C+Noel+L&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.issn=1836-5795&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=2+p.121-130&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=130&rft_id=info:doi/10.1071%2FCP17240&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1836-0947&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1836-0947&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1836-0947&client=summon