Reproductive output of female Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae): comparison of molecular forms

Knowledge of ecological differences between the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae Giles (Diptera: Culicidae) might lead to understanding of their unique contribution to disease transmission, to better vector control, and to identification of the forces that have separated them. We compared female...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of medical entomology Vol. 43; no. 5; pp. 833 - 839
Main Authors Yaro, A.S, Dao, A, Adamou, A, Crawford, J.E, Traoré, S.F, Touré, A.M, Gwadz, R, Lehmann, T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.09.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Knowledge of ecological differences between the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae Giles (Diptera: Culicidae) might lead to understanding of their unique contribution to disease transmission, to better vector control, and to identification of the forces that have separated them. We compared female fecundity measured as egg batch size in relation to body size between the molecular forms in Mali and contrasted them with their sibling species, Anopheles arabiensis Patton. To determine whether eggs of different egg batches are of similar "quality," we compared the total protein content of first-stage larvae (L1s), collected <2 h after hatching in deionized water. Egg batch size significantly varied between An. gambiae and An. arabiensis and between the molecular forms of An. gambiae (mean batch size was 186.3, 182.5, and 162.0 eggs in An. arabiensis and the M and the S molecular form of An. gambiae, respectively). After accommodating female body size, however, the difference in batch size was not significant. In the S molecular form, egg protein content was not correlated with egg batch size (r = -0.08, P > 0.7) nor with female body size (r = -0.18, P > 0.4), suggesting that females with more resources invest in more eggs rather than in higher quality eggs. The mean total protein in eggs of the M form (0.407 &mgr;g per L1) was 6% higher than that of the S form (0.384 &mgr;g per L1), indicating that the M form invests a greater portion of her resources into current (rather than future) reproduction. A greater investment per offspring coupled with larger egg batch size may reflect an adaptation of the M form to low productivity larval sites as independent evidence suggests.
AbstractList Knowledge of ecological differences between the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae Giles (Diptera: Culicidae) might lead to understanding of their unique contribution to disease transmission, to better vector control, and to identification of the forces that have separated them. We compared female fecundity measured as egg batch size in relation to body size between the molecular forms in Mali and contrasted them with their sibling species, Anopheles arabiensis Patton. To determine whether eggs of different egg batches are of similar "quality," we compared the total protein content of first-stage larvae (L1s), collected <2 h after hatching in deionized water. Egg batch size significantly varied between An. gambiae and An. arabiensis and between the molecular forms of An. gambiae (mean batch size was 186.3, 182.5, and 162.0 eggs in An. arabiensis and the M and the S molecular form of An. gambiae, respectively). After accommodating female body size, however, the difference in batch size was not significant. In the S molecular form, egg protein content was not correlated with egg batch size (r = -0.08, P > 0.7) nor with female body size (r = -0.18, P > 0.4), suggesting that females with more resources invest in more eggs rather than in higher quality eggs. The mean total protein in eggs of the M form (0.407 &mgr;g per L1) was 6% higher than that of the S form (0.384 &mgr;g per L1), indicating that the M form invests a greater portion of her resources into current (rather than future) reproduction. A greater investment per offspring coupled with larger egg batch size may reflect an adaptation of the M form to low productivity larval sites as independent evidence suggests.
Knowledge of ecological differences between the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae Giles (Diptera: Culicidae) might lead to understanding of their unique contribution to disease transmission, to better vector control, and to identification of the forces that have separated them. We compared female fecundity measured as egg batch size in relation to body size between the molecular forms in Mali and contrasted them with their sibling species, Anopheles arabiensis Patton. To determine whether eggs of different egg batches are of similar "quality," we compared the total protein content of first-stage larvae (L1s), collected < 2 h after hatching in deionized water. Egg batch size significantly varied between An. gambiae and An. arabiensis and between the molecular forms of An. gambiae (mean batch size was 186.3, 182.5, and 162.0 eggs in An. arabiensis and the M and the S molecular form of An. gambiae, respectively). After accommodating female body size, however, the difference in batch size was not significant. In the S molecular form, egg protein content was not correlated with egg batch size (r = -0.08, P > 0.7) nor with female body size (r = -0.18, P > 0.4), suggesting that females with more resources invest in more eggs rather than in higher quality eggs. The mean total protein in eggs of the M form (0.407 microg per L1) was 6% higher than that of the S form (0.384 microg per L1), indicating that the M form invests a greater portion of her resources into current (rather than future) reproduction. A greater investment per offspring coupled with larger egg batch size may reflect an adaptation of the M form to low productivity larval sites as independent evidence suggests.
Author Crawford, J.E
Traoré, S.F
Yaro, A.S
Touré, A.M
Dao, A
Lehmann, T
Adamou, A
Gwadz, R
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Yaro, A.S
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Dao, A
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Adamou, A
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Crawford, J.E
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Traoré, S.F
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Touré, A.M
– sequence: 7
  fullname: Gwadz, R
– sequence: 8
  fullname: Lehmann, T
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17017216$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo9kElPwzAUhC0Eoi3wF8CXSHBI8XtO3JhbFzapUiWWc2Q7zyUoiaOkQeLfU8Rymss3o5mZsMMmNMSYBjEFJeS1EIgxplkaYYZCqAh1IqN0kUkZyfnTZnM3v4_SFU7FdLmJ5AIP2Bi0zGLUmB2y8b9_xCZ9_y6EyCDRx2wEMwEzBDVm7onaLhSD25UfxMOwa4cdD557qk1FfN6E9o0q6vnW1LY0xC9XZbujztzw5VCVriwMXd1wF-rWdGUfmm9zHSpyQ2U67kNX96fsyJuqp7NfPWGvd7cvy4d4vbl_XM7XsYVMqFjJRBhdoPVWaQAP1vkCXKFsgmCtQQe6UClqRU5bT2BhJlEXqUFDCQk8Yec_ue1gayrytitr033mf2v3wMUP4E3IzXbfN399RgFyf4xIVAr4BV3Jajs
ContentType Journal Article
DBID FBQ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DOI 10.1603/0022-2585%282006%2943%5B833%3AROOFAG%5D2.0.CO%3B2
DatabaseName AGRIS
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: FBQ
  name: AGRIS
  url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Public Health
Zoology
EISSN 1938-2928
EndPage 839
ExternalDocumentID 17017216
US201300804651
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
GeographicLocations Mali
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Mali
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Intramural NIH HHS
GroupedDBID ---
-JH
0R~
1TH
29L
3O-
3V.
4.4
48X
4R4
53G
5GY
5WD
7X7
7XC
88E
8C1
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
AABJS
AABMN
AABZA
AACFU
AACZT
AAESY
AAIMJ
AAIYJ
AAJQQ
AAMDB
AAMVS
AAOGV
AAPGJ
AAPQZ
AAPSS
AAPXW
AAUQX
AAVAP
AAWDT
ABCQX
ABEUO
ABIXL
ABJNI
ABPPZ
ABPTD
ABQLI
ABSAR
ABSMQ
ABTAH
ABUWG
ABWST
ABXZS
ACFRR
ACGFS
ACIMA
ACUFI
ACUTJ
ADBBV
ADEIU
ADGZP
ADHKW
ADHSS
ADHZD
ADIPN
ADJQC
ADORX
ADOYD
ADQLU
ADRIX
ADRTK
ADVEK
ADYVW
AEDJY
AEGPL
AEJOX
AEKSI
AELWJ
AEMDU
AENEX
AENZO
AEPUE
AEPYG
AETBJ
AEWNT
AFFIJ
AFFZL
AFGWE
AFIYH
AFKRA
AFNWH
AFOFC
AFRAH
AFXEN
AFYAG
AGINJ
AGQXC
AGSYK
AHMBA
AI.
AIKOY
AIMBJ
AJEEA
AKPMI
AKWXX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQC
ALXQX
ANFBD
APIBT
APJGH
AQDSO
AQKUS
ARIXL
ASAOO
ASMCH
ATCPS
ATDFG
AVWKF
AWCFO
AXUDD
AYOIW
AZQFJ
BAYMD
BCRHZ
BENPR
BEYMZ
BGYMP
BHONS
BHPHI
BPHCQ
BQDIO
BSWAC
BTRTY
BVRKM
BVXVI
BYORX
BZKNY
CAG
CASEJ
CCPQU
CDBKE
COF
CS3
DAKXR
DC7
DILTD
DPPUQ
DU5
EBS
EIHJH
EJD
ELUNK
F5P
FBQ
FHSFR
FLUFQ
FOEOM
FOTVD
FQBLK
FYUFA
GAUVT
GJXCC
HAR
HCIFZ
HF~
HMCUK
IAO
IFM
IHR
INH
J21
KBUDW
KOP
KSI
KSN
L7B
M1P
MBLQV
MBTAY
NLBLG
NOMLY
NOYVH
NVLIB
O9-
OAWHX
OBFPC
OBOKY
OCZFY
ODMLO
OHT
OJQWA
OJZSN
OPAEJ
OWPYF
P2P
PAFKI
PATMY
PEELM
PQ0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PYCSY
Q5J
Q5Y
RBO
REY
ROL
ROX
ROZ
RUSNO
RXO
TCN
TJX
TLC
TMA
UKHRP
VH1
WH7
YAYTL
YHZ
YKOAZ
YXANX
ZCG
ZGI
ZY4
~EF
~KM
AAHBH
AARHZ
AAUAY
ABMNT
ABNHQ
ABXVV
ACZBC
ADQBN
AGKRT
AGMDO
ALIPV
ATGXG
AVNTJ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
H13
ITC
NPM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-b1806-6340a9d2bfb6911f1bcfd1cd6b421bba2c19d65296ec9bfe1b17329d5a2ae4e02
ISSN 0022-2585
IngestDate Wed Oct 16 00:50:02 EDT 2024
Wed Dec 27 19:21:13 EST 2023
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b1806-6340a9d2bfb6911f1bcfd1cd6b421bba2c19d65296ec9bfe1b17329d5a2ae4e02
Notes http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585(2006)43[833:ROOFAG]2.0.CO;2
PMID 17017216
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_17017216
fao_agris_US201300804651
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2006-Sep
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2006-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2006
  text: 2006-Sep
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Journal of medical entomology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Med Entomol
PublicationYear 2006
SSID ssj0008149
Score 1.7959182
Snippet Knowledge of ecological differences between the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae Giles (Diptera: Culicidae) might lead to understanding of their unique...
SourceID pubmed
fao
SourceType Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 833
SubjectTerms Animals
Anopheles - genetics
Anopheles - parasitology
Anopheles - physiology
Anopheles arabiensis
Anopheles gambiae
body size
Body Size - physiology
clutch size
cytogenetics
egg masses
egg size
fecundity
Female
Fertility - physiology
insect egg quality
insect reproduction
M molecular form
molecular genetics
Ovum - chemistry
Ovum - physiology
Plasmodium falciparum - isolation & purification
protein content
Proteins - analysis
S molecular form
species differences
Species Specificity
Title Reproductive output of female Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae): comparison of molecular forms
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17017216
Volume 43
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9swFBbpxspgjC27tLuhhw02gj1LvqpvuTQrhTa7NNDtJUiW1AbqOLQJg_2U_dodWYrjdCtsexGOguODz5dz07kg9FpwkqZgenvgXGgvopx6gjDlUR7oVIREBDbb4jg5GEeHp_Fpq_WzkbW0XAg___HHupL_4SrsAV9Nlew_cLb-UdiAa-AvrMBhWP-Kx2A924atJv2nXC7my-pcX6sCxH4HPPv5OWiVq84ZL8SUV9bkAGSEuqwG8vSXF9N8Krnpy2Q-582RhJ1iNTe3qm-8usGILdw5D6iustiI0H_lroLGr83NAS83oqddyYtyubHVv-TfV-n2h_7-9ZgEW8Uk1jUCNLbDeHxlRSsLTb2HKwV3ste2aHIYixuCNLPtMVY62TY8-k3cJ0FY5Ue6p72hMXiQQI-5YBF8F8e9zISs47D7eTQadj-YrQH1A78_Mrs9utaDdXbi-As157lgS5tB8VtoK82MBB32PtU6PiPOsXJP3kbM0fO-QY2jxVBi6aipqGkACsCq0by85tZU5s3JA3TfsRR3LcgeopaatdH2kcu8aKN7Nr6LbdlaG935VlbsfoTyJgqxRSEuNbYoxDUKsUMhfuswuIdrBL7bw2v0mZtr9OEKfY_ReLh_0j_w3OgO-KdngIckjALOJBVaJKBONRG5liSXiYgoEYLTnDCZmDN_lTOhFREkDSmTMadcRSqgT9CtWTlTOwjrLAUbNsmBtcyYk0KmjGsmmZRpSni0i3bg9U34GZA42WTdLnpq3-lkblu3TMz0AdOu6tnNNz1Hd9eQfoFuaxAW6iVYngvxqgIBrMcfj34BONd0Qw
link.rule.ids 783
linkProvider FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reproductive+output+of+female+Anopheles+gambiae+%28Diptera%3A+Culicidae%29%3A+comparison+of+molecular+forms&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+medical+entomology&rft.au=Yaro%2C+A.S&rft.au=Dao%2C+A&rft.au=Adamou%2C+A&rft.au=Crawford%2C+J.E&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.issn=0022-2585&rft.eissn=1938-2928&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=833&rft.epage=839&rft_id=info:doi/10.1603%2F0022-2585%25282006%252943%255B833%253AROOFAG%255D2.0.CO%253B2&rft.externalDocID=US201300804651
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-2585&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-2585&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-2585&client=summon