SAT0546 Total osteophyte score is a biomarker of current and persistent pain in knee osteoarthritis subjects

BackgroundX-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated associations between osteophyte severity and current pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Persistent pain over 5 years was also associated with x-ray osteophyte severity. A biomarker to identify knee OA subjects with persistent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 76; no. Suppl 2; p. 983
Main Authors Feng, S, Levesque, MC
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Limited 01.06.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract BackgroundX-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated associations between osteophyte severity and current pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Persistent pain over 5 years was also associated with x-ray osteophyte severity. A biomarker to identify knee OA subjects with persistent pain may reduce placebo response rates in clinical trials.ObjectivesTo determine whether the total knee osteophyte score (TKOS), as measured by MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS), is a biomarker of current and persistent pain severity in knee OA subjects.MethodsKnee OA subjects from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Biomarker Consortium were longitudinally assessed over 4 years and categorized as pain and x-ray progressors (n=194), x-ray–only progressors (n=103), pain-only progressors (n=103), and non-progressors (n=200). Knee osteophyte severity was scored at baseline by MOAKS at 12 positions across the knee and summed to obtain the TKOS. TKOS was summarized as means and SDs in the 4 progression groups; each progression group TKOS was compared with the non-progression group using Wilcoxon rank sum tests (Table 1). The longitudinal Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scores were plotted and tested with a linear mixed model, by high and low TKOS status, defined as above and below the TKOS median of 6 (Figure 1). Subjects with persistent pain were defined based on WOMAC pain scores at 4 out of 5 time points higher than the thresholds listed in Table 2; at each threshold, mean differences in TKOS were tested using analysis of variance among those with and without persistent pain.ResultsThe distribution of baseline TKOS differed by progression group, with the highest TKOS among pain and x-ray progressors (Table 1). In all 4 progression groups, baseline WOMAC pain scores were higher in subjects with high (>6) versus low (≤6) baseline TKOS status (P=0.0001, 0.0383, 0.0035, and 0.0466, respectively). The difference in WOMAC pain scores between TKOS high and low subgroups was constant over time (Figure 1; solid curves above and parallel to dashed curves with TKOS main effect always significant [P<0.01] in all 4 progression groups), but the TKOS×Time interaction term in the longitudinal mixed model was not statistically significant, indicating that the pain difference between the TKOS high and low subgroups did not change over time. TKOS was highly associated with persistent pain, with TKOS higher at all thresholds (Table 2).Table 1.Distribution Parameters of TKOS at Baseline by OA Progression TypeProgression TypeTKOS P value) nMeanSD X-ray and pain19410.436.60<0.0001X-ray only1038.796.560.06Pain only1038.035.910.22None2007.326.07–Table 2.Group Sizes and TKOS Mean Differences for Different WOMAC Pain Thresholds for Persistent PainWOMAC Pain ThresholdSubjects With Persistent Pain, nTKOS Difference for Subjects With Persistent Pain vs Those Without P value 22112.5<0.000131502.4<0.000141122.40.00016523.6<0.00018212.50.06ConclusionsTKOS is a candidate biomarker for current and persistent pain in knee OA patients and may be a predictive biomarker for reduced placebo response rates in clinical trials.AcknowledgementsAbbVie funded the analysis; participated in analysis, design and interpretation and in abstract writing, review, and approval; and funded writing support by M. Theisen of CPS.Disclosure of InterestS. Feng Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, M. Levesque Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie
AbstractList BackgroundX-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated associations between osteophyte severity and current pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Persistent pain over 5 years was also associated with x-ray osteophyte severity. A biomarker to identify knee OA subjects with persistent pain may reduce placebo response rates in clinical trials.ObjectivesTo determine whether the total knee osteophyte score (TKOS), as measured by MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS), is a biomarker of current and persistent pain severity in knee OA subjects.MethodsKnee OA subjects from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Biomarker Consortium were longitudinally assessed over 4 years and categorized as pain and x-ray progressors (n=194), x-ray–only progressors (n=103), pain-only progressors (n=103), and non-progressors (n=200). Knee osteophyte severity was scored at baseline by MOAKS at 12 positions across the knee and summed to obtain the TKOS. TKOS was summarized as means and SDs in the 4 progression groups; each progression group TKOS was compared with the non-progression group using Wilcoxon rank sum tests (Table 1). The longitudinal Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scores were plotted and tested with a linear mixed model, by high and low TKOS status, defined as above and below the TKOS median of 6 (Figure 1). Subjects with persistent pain were defined based on WOMAC pain scores at 4 out of 5 time points higher than the thresholds listed in Table 2; at each threshold, mean differences in TKOS were tested using analysis of variance among those with and without persistent pain.ResultsThe distribution of baseline TKOS differed by progression group, with the highest TKOS among pain and x-ray progressors (Table 1). In all 4 progression groups, baseline WOMAC pain scores were higher in subjects with high (>6) versus low (≤6) baseline TKOS status (P=0.0001, 0.0383, 0.0035, and 0.0466, respectively). The difference in WOMAC pain scores between TKOS high and low subgroups was constant over time (Figure 1; solid curves above and parallel to dashed curves with TKOS main effect always significant [P<0.01] in all 4 progression groups), but the TKOS×Time interaction term in the longitudinal mixed model was not statistically significant, indicating that the pain difference between the TKOS high and low subgroups did not change over time. TKOS was highly associated with persistent pain, with TKOS higher at all thresholds (Table 2).Table 1.Distribution Parameters of TKOS at Baseline by OA Progression TypeProgression TypeTKOS P value) nMeanSD X-ray and pain19410.436.60<0.0001X-ray only1038.796.560.06Pain only1038.035.910.22None2007.326.07–Table 2.Group Sizes and TKOS Mean Differences for Different WOMAC Pain Thresholds for Persistent PainWOMAC Pain ThresholdSubjects With Persistent Pain, nTKOS Difference for Subjects With Persistent Pain vs Those Without P value 22112.5<0.000131502.4<0.000141122.40.00016523.6<0.00018212.50.06ConclusionsTKOS is a candidate biomarker for current and persistent pain in knee OA patients and may be a predictive biomarker for reduced placebo response rates in clinical trials.AcknowledgementsAbbVie funded the analysis; participated in analysis, design and interpretation and in abstract writing, review, and approval; and funded writing support by M. Theisen of CPS.Disclosure of InterestS. Feng Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, M. Levesque Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie
Background X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated associations between osteophyte severity and current pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Persistent pain over 5 years was also associated with x-ray osteophyte severity. A biomarker to identify knee OA subjects with persistent pain may reduce placebo response rates in clinical trials. Objectives To determine whether the total knee osteophyte score (TKOS), as measured by MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS), is a biomarker of current and persistent pain severity in knee OA subjects. Methods Knee OA subjects from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Biomarker Consortium were longitudinally assessed over 4 years and categorized as pain and x-ray progressors (n=194), x-ray-only progressors (n=103), pain-only progressors (n=103), and non-progressors (n=200). Knee osteophyte severity was scored at baseline by MOAKS at 12 positions across the knee and summed to obtain the TKOS. TKOS was summarized as means and SDs in the 4 progression groups; each progression group TKOS was compared with the non-progression group using Wilcoxon rank sum tests ( Table 1 ). The longitudinal Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scores were plotted and tested with a linear mixed model, by high and low TKOS status, defined as above and below the TKOS median of 6 ( Figure 1 ). Subjects with persistent pain were defined based on WOMAC pain scores at 4 out of 5 time points higher than the thresholds listed in Table 2 ; at each threshold, mean differences in TKOS were tested using analysis of variance among those with and without persistent pain. Results The distribution of baseline TKOS differed by progression group, with the highest TKOS among pain and x-ray progressors ( Table 1 ). In all 4 progression groups, baseline WOMAC pain scores were higher in subjects with high (>6) versus low (≤6) baseline TKOS status (P=0.0001, 0.0383, 0.0035, and 0.0466, respectively). The difference in WOMAC pain scores between TKOS high and low subgroups was constant over time ( Figure 1 ; solid curves above and parallel to dashed curves with TKOS main effect always significant [P<0.01] in all 4 progression groups), but the TKOS×Time interaction term in the longitudinal mixed model was not statistically significant, indicating that the pain difference between the TKOS high and low subgroups did not change over time. TKOS was highly associated with persistent pain, with TKOS higher at all thresholds ( Table 2 ). Table 1. Distribution Parameters of TKOS at Baseline by OA Progression Type Progression Type TKOS P value) --- n Mean SD --- X-ray and pain 194 10.43 6.60 <0.0001 X-ray only 103 8.79 6.56 0.06 Pain only 103 8.03 5.91 0.22 None 200 7.32 6.07 - Table 2. Group Sizes and TKOS Mean Differences for Different WOMAC Pain Thresholds for Persistent Pain WOMAC Pain Threshold Subjects With Persistent Pain, n TKOS Difference for Subjects With Persistent Pain vs Those Without P value --- 2 211 2.5 <0.0001 3 150 2.4 <0.0001 4 112 2.4 0.0001 6 52 3.6 <0.0001 8 21 2.5 0.06 Conclusions TKOS is a candidate biomarker for current and persistent pain in knee OA patients and may be a predictive biomarker for reduced placebo response rates in clinical trials. Acknowledgements AbbVie funded the analysis; participated in analysis, design and interpretation and in abstract writing, review, and approval; and funded writing support by M. Theisen of CPS. Disclosure of Interest S. Feng Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, M. Levesque Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie
Author Feng, S
Levesque, MC
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: S
  surname: Feng
  fullname: Feng, S
  organization: AbbVie Inc., Worcester, MA, United States
– sequence: 2
  givenname: MC
  surname: Levesque
  fullname: Levesque, MC
  organization: AbbVie Inc., Worcester, MA, United States
BookMark eNqVkL9qwzAQxkVJoUnadxBkdipZlmTTKYT-g0CHprOQ5TOxk0iuZA_ZuvRF-yRV6g5dCwfHfdz3HfeboYl1FhBaULKklIlbba3fwXCsmpCkhMoEhoP2S04KfoGmNBN5lAWZoCkhhCVZIeQVmoXQxpHkNJ8i-7raEp6Jr4_Prev1AbvQg-t2px5wMM4DbgLWuGzcUfs9eOxqbAbvwfZY2wp34EMTLXHsdGNxrL0FGGO073e-6WNCGMoWTB-u0WWtDwFufvscvT3cb9dPyebl8Xm92iQlzQlP0hSkZJRlnIPJOKtFbnIJdVETqg2UleEp1BkteMo0Fbksa2kYiyIzRMiKzdFizO28ex8g9Kp1g7fxpEoJYzJnaYydo7txy3gXgodadb6Jf54UJeoMWP0BrM6A1Q9gdQYc3WJ0l8f2X8ZvSxOKww
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2017, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Copyright: 2017 © 2017, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Copyright_xml – notice: 2017, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
– notice: Copyright: 2017 © 2017, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7X7
7XB
88E
88I
8AF
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
BTHHO
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9-
K9.
LK8
M0R
M0S
M1P
M2P
M7P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-eular.5095
DatabaseName CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Science Database (Alumni Edition)
STEM Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
BMJ Journals
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection (UHCL Subscription)
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biological Sciences
Consumer Health Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Proquest Medical Database
Science Database
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central Basic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest AP Science
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Family Health (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Science Journals
ProQuest Family Health
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
BMJ Journals
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
DatabaseTitleList
ProQuest Central Student
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1468-2060
ExternalDocumentID 10_1136_annrheumdis_2017_eular_5095
annrheumdis
GroupedDBID ---
.55
.GJ
.VT
169
23M
2WC
39C
3O-
4.4
40O
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6J9
7X7
7~S
88E
88I
8AF
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8R4
8R5
AAHLL
AAKAS
AAOJX
AAWJN
AAWTL
AAXUO
ABAAH
ABJNI
ABKDF
ABMQD
ABOCM
ABTFR
ABUWG
ABVAJ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACGTL
ACHTP
ACMFJ
ACOAB
ACOFX
ACPRK
ACQSR
ACTZY
ADBBV
ADCEG
ADFRT
ADUGQ
ADZCM
AEKJL
AENEX
AFKRA
AFWFF
AGQPQ
AHMBA
AHNKE
AHQMW
AJYBZ
AKKEP
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
AZQEC
BAWUL
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
BKNYI
BLJBA
BOMFT
BPHCQ
BTFSW
BTHHO
BVXVI
C1A
C45
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CXRWF
DIK
DWQXO
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
FDB
FYUFA
GNUQQ
H13
HAJ
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
HZ~
IAO
IEA
IHR
INH
INR
IOF
ITC
J5H
K9-
KQ8
L7B
LK8
M0R
M1P
M2P
M7P
N9A
NTWIH
NXWIF
O9-
OK1
OVD
P2P
PHGZT
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
Q2X
R53
RHI
RMJ
RPM
RV8
RWL
RXW
TAE
TEORI
TR2
UAW
UKHRP
UYXKK
V24
VM9
VVN
W2D
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X6Y
X7M
YFH
YOC
YQY
ZGI
ZXP
AAFWJ
AALRI
AAYXX
CITATION
PHGZM
3V.
7XB
8FK
K9.
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-b1805-22e77313455ec453f68c87ef9f01acebdc52ef419523a1687bf7c3352e3c067d3
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 0003-4967
IngestDate Fri Jul 25 10:58:39 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:58:56 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:09:03 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue Suppl 2
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b1805-22e77313455ec453f68c87ef9f01acebdc52ef419523a1687bf7c3352e3c067d3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
OpenAccessLink https://ard.bmj.com/content/annrheumdis/76/Suppl_2/983.1.full.pdf
PQID 2033783245
PQPubID 2041045
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_2033783245
crossref_primary_10_1136_annrheumdis_2017_eular_5095
bmj_primary_10_1136_annrheumdis_2017_eular_5095
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20170600
2017-06-00
20170601
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2017
  text: 20170600
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Kidlington
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Kidlington
PublicationTitle Annals of the rheumatic diseases
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Elsevier Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Limited
SSID ssj0000818
Score 2.2154825
Snippet BackgroundX-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated associations between osteophyte severity and current pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA)...
Background X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated associations between osteophyte severity and current pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA)...
SourceID proquest
crossref
bmj
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 983
SubjectTerms Arthritis
Biomarkers
Clinical trials
Knee
Magnetic resonance imaging
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Osteoarthritis
Pain
Response rates
Statistical analysis
Stockholders
Title SAT0546 Total osteophyte score is a biomarker of current and persistent pain in knee osteoarthritis subjects
URI http://ard.bmj.com/content/76/Suppl_2/983.1.full
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2033783245
Volume 76
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LS8QwEA4-QLyIT1xfBPRabZukyZ5ERRFBEV1hbyVPXB_tut39_85kW8SLIPRS2vTwzXRmMpn5hpCTHDm6tHCJCUiqzZ1JVF_oJDhVaCsLywzmIe8fitsXfjcUwzbh1rRllZ1NjIba1RZz5LBJZ0yC-nFxPv5KcGoUnq62IzQWyTJSl6FWy6H8scQqU93EPN4v5Ao5bqeY4JCXyauffbpRA4oCltpj1ecpuE_0Mubz7bef-m2mo--5WSdrbdBIL-ZS3iALvtokK_ftsfgW-Xi-GEBQVNBBDbE0xb6NGuCbetogSyUdNVRTbLTHWpwJrQO1c1omqitHx5gygyVwO9ajisL1Xnk__wxo1mvkPaLNzGDOptkmLzfXg6vbpB2jkJhMpSLJcy8lyxgXwlsuWCiUVdKHfkgzbb1xVuQ-cMAvZzorlDRBWmzF8syCL3NshyxVdeV3CQ0QMHCdYxTmeWpT7dPMqZTbNA-5dqZHzgC6cjwnyijjBoPFpucO7BLBLiPYJYLdI7yD-X_LDjqRlO1Ph-90KrL39-N9shplHpMpB2RpOpn5Q4gtpuYoKtARWb68fnh8-gan3dCO
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKkQoXVF5qSwuWgGMg8SP2HlBVAdWWdnthK-0t-Kku0GS72RXiT_EbO-MkQr0gcaiUS5Q4h2--zMueGULeMOzRZaTPbMSm2sLbTI-kyaLXpXGqdNxiHnJyXo4vxJeZnG2QP0MtDB6rHHRiUtS-cZgjhyCdcwX0E_JwcZ3h1CjcXR1GaHS0OA2_f0HI1n44-QTyfcvY8efpx3HWTxXIbKFzmTEWlOIFF1IGJySPpXZahTiKeWFcsN5JFqIoRhCimaLUykblsDIpcAeq3XP47j1yHwxvjsGemqm_ml8XepjQJ0al2iKv-6kpOFRmeRnWV37eAjHBMgQ8ZfoOzDVaNXv1_bZdvG0Wkq073iaPeieVHnWsekw2Qv2EbE36bfin5OfXoyk4YSWdNuC7U6wTaUBcq0Bb7IpJ5y01FAv78ezPkjaRuq4NFDW1pwtM0cESuF2YeU3h-lGH0H0GmHyZ-izRdm0xR9Q-Ixd3AvBzslk3ddghNIKDIgxDry-I3OUm5IXXuXA5i8x4u0veA3TVomvMUaWAhqci6wHsCsGuEtgVgr1LxADz_y3bH0RS9T85vjNQcu_fj1-RB-Pp5Kw6Ozk_fUEeJvmnRM4-2Vwt1-EA_JqVfZnIRMm3u2bvDTxuCtA
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bT9RAFD7BJdn4YvAWEdRJ1MdK25l2Zh-IQWEDIhuiS8JbnWtYlHbZ7sb41_h1nNNLDC8mPpD0pWmnD9_5Oucy5wLwLqUeXTpzkQnUVFs4E6lRpqPgVK6tzC03FIc8meSHZ-LLeXa-Bjd9LQylVfZ7YrNRu8pSjByddM4l0k9kO6FLizjdH3-cX0c0QYpOWvtxGi1Fjv2f3-i-1btH-yjr92k6Pph-Poy6CQORSVScRWnqpeQJF1nmrch4yJVV0odRiBNtvXE2S30QyQjdNZ3kSpogLVUpeW5xm3ccv_sA1iV5RQNY_3QwOf32Vw-oRPXz-sQol0N4281QoREziwu_unKzGmmKesJTzukHVN6k48zV5V0teVdJNJpvvAGPOpOV7bUcewxrvnwCw5PuUP4p_Pq-N0WTLGfTCi15RlUjFQpv6VlNPTLZrGaaUZk_ZQItWBWYbZtCMV06NqeAHS7B27melQyvn6X37WeQ1xdN1yVWrwxFjOpncHYvED-HQVmV_gWwgOaK0CnZgF7ENtY-TpyKhY3TkGpnNmEHoSvmbZuOonFveFNy3YNdENhFA3ZBYG-C6GH-v2XbvUiK7pend3qCvvz34zcwROYWX48mx1vwsBF_E9XZhsFysfKv0MhZmtcdmxj8uG8C3wIPfxBr
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SAT0546+Total+osteophyte+score+is+a+biomarker+of+current+and+persistent+pain+in+knee+osteoarthritis+subjects&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+the+rheumatic+diseases&rft.au=Feng%2C+S&rft.au=Levesque%2C+MC&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Limited&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.volume=76&rft.spage=983&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136%2Fannrheumdis-2017-eular.5095&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0003-4967&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0003-4967&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0003-4967&client=summon