SAT0546 Total osteophyte score is a biomarker of current and persistent pain in knee osteoarthritis subjects
BackgroundX-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated associations between osteophyte severity and current pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Persistent pain over 5 years was also associated with x-ray osteophyte severity. A biomarker to identify knee OA subjects with persistent...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 76; no. Suppl 2; p. 983 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Kidlington
Elsevier Limited
01.06.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | BackgroundX-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated associations between osteophyte severity and current pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Persistent pain over 5 years was also associated with x-ray osteophyte severity. A biomarker to identify knee OA subjects with persistent pain may reduce placebo response rates in clinical trials.ObjectivesTo determine whether the total knee osteophyte score (TKOS), as measured by MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS), is a biomarker of current and persistent pain severity in knee OA subjects.MethodsKnee OA subjects from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Biomarker Consortium were longitudinally assessed over 4 years and categorized as pain and x-ray progressors (n=194), x-ray–only progressors (n=103), pain-only progressors (n=103), and non-progressors (n=200). Knee osteophyte severity was scored at baseline by MOAKS at 12 positions across the knee and summed to obtain the TKOS. TKOS was summarized as means and SDs in the 4 progression groups; each progression group TKOS was compared with the non-progression group using Wilcoxon rank sum tests (Table 1). The longitudinal Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scores were plotted and tested with a linear mixed model, by high and low TKOS status, defined as above and below the TKOS median of 6 (Figure 1). Subjects with persistent pain were defined based on WOMAC pain scores at 4 out of 5 time points higher than the thresholds listed in Table 2; at each threshold, mean differences in TKOS were tested using analysis of variance among those with and without persistent pain.ResultsThe distribution of baseline TKOS differed by progression group, with the highest TKOS among pain and x-ray progressors (Table 1). In all 4 progression groups, baseline WOMAC pain scores were higher in subjects with high (>6) versus low (≤6) baseline TKOS status (P=0.0001, 0.0383, 0.0035, and 0.0466, respectively). The difference in WOMAC pain scores between TKOS high and low subgroups was constant over time (Figure 1; solid curves above and parallel to dashed curves with TKOS main effect always significant [P<0.01] in all 4 progression groups), but the TKOS×Time interaction term in the longitudinal mixed model was not statistically significant, indicating that the pain difference between the TKOS high and low subgroups did not change over time. TKOS was highly associated with persistent pain, with TKOS higher at all thresholds (Table 2).Table 1.Distribution Parameters of TKOS at Baseline by OA Progression TypeProgression TypeTKOS P value) nMeanSD X-ray and pain19410.436.60<0.0001X-ray only1038.796.560.06Pain only1038.035.910.22None2007.326.07–Table 2.Group Sizes and TKOS Mean Differences for Different WOMAC Pain Thresholds for Persistent PainWOMAC Pain ThresholdSubjects With Persistent Pain, nTKOS Difference for Subjects With Persistent Pain vs Those Without P value 22112.5<0.000131502.4<0.000141122.40.00016523.6<0.00018212.50.06ConclusionsTKOS is a candidate biomarker for current and persistent pain in knee OA patients and may be a predictive biomarker for reduced placebo response rates in clinical trials.AcknowledgementsAbbVie funded the analysis; participated in analysis, design and interpretation and in abstract writing, review, and approval; and funded writing support by M. Theisen of CPS.Disclosure of InterestS. Feng Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, M. Levesque Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie |
---|---|
AbstractList | BackgroundX-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated associations between osteophyte severity and current pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Persistent pain over 5 years was also associated with x-ray osteophyte severity. A biomarker to identify knee OA subjects with persistent pain may reduce placebo response rates in clinical trials.ObjectivesTo determine whether the total knee osteophyte score (TKOS), as measured by MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS), is a biomarker of current and persistent pain severity in knee OA subjects.MethodsKnee OA subjects from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Biomarker Consortium were longitudinally assessed over 4 years and categorized as pain and x-ray progressors (n=194), x-ray–only progressors (n=103), pain-only progressors (n=103), and non-progressors (n=200). Knee osteophyte severity was scored at baseline by MOAKS at 12 positions across the knee and summed to obtain the TKOS. TKOS was summarized as means and SDs in the 4 progression groups; each progression group TKOS was compared with the non-progression group using Wilcoxon rank sum tests (Table 1). The longitudinal Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scores were plotted and tested with a linear mixed model, by high and low TKOS status, defined as above and below the TKOS median of 6 (Figure 1). Subjects with persistent pain were defined based on WOMAC pain scores at 4 out of 5 time points higher than the thresholds listed in Table 2; at each threshold, mean differences in TKOS were tested using analysis of variance among those with and without persistent pain.ResultsThe distribution of baseline TKOS differed by progression group, with the highest TKOS among pain and x-ray progressors (Table 1). In all 4 progression groups, baseline WOMAC pain scores were higher in subjects with high (>6) versus low (≤6) baseline TKOS status (P=0.0001, 0.0383, 0.0035, and 0.0466, respectively). The difference in WOMAC pain scores between TKOS high and low subgroups was constant over time (Figure 1; solid curves above and parallel to dashed curves with TKOS main effect always significant [P<0.01] in all 4 progression groups), but the TKOS×Time interaction term in the longitudinal mixed model was not statistically significant, indicating that the pain difference between the TKOS high and low subgroups did not change over time. TKOS was highly associated with persistent pain, with TKOS higher at all thresholds (Table 2).Table 1.Distribution Parameters of TKOS at Baseline by OA Progression TypeProgression TypeTKOS P value) nMeanSD X-ray and pain19410.436.60<0.0001X-ray only1038.796.560.06Pain only1038.035.910.22None2007.326.07–Table 2.Group Sizes and TKOS Mean Differences for Different WOMAC Pain Thresholds for Persistent PainWOMAC Pain ThresholdSubjects With Persistent Pain, nTKOS Difference for Subjects With Persistent Pain vs Those Without P value 22112.5<0.000131502.4<0.000141122.40.00016523.6<0.00018212.50.06ConclusionsTKOS is a candidate biomarker for current and persistent pain in knee OA patients and may be a predictive biomarker for reduced placebo response rates in clinical trials.AcknowledgementsAbbVie funded the analysis; participated in analysis, design and interpretation and in abstract writing, review, and approval; and funded writing support by M. Theisen of CPS.Disclosure of InterestS. Feng Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, M. Levesque Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie Background X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated associations between osteophyte severity and current pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Persistent pain over 5 years was also associated with x-ray osteophyte severity. A biomarker to identify knee OA subjects with persistent pain may reduce placebo response rates in clinical trials. Objectives To determine whether the total knee osteophyte score (TKOS), as measured by MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS), is a biomarker of current and persistent pain severity in knee OA subjects. Methods Knee OA subjects from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Biomarker Consortium were longitudinally assessed over 4 years and categorized as pain and x-ray progressors (n=194), x-ray-only progressors (n=103), pain-only progressors (n=103), and non-progressors (n=200). Knee osteophyte severity was scored at baseline by MOAKS at 12 positions across the knee and summed to obtain the TKOS. TKOS was summarized as means and SDs in the 4 progression groups; each progression group TKOS was compared with the non-progression group using Wilcoxon rank sum tests ( Table 1 ). The longitudinal Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scores were plotted and tested with a linear mixed model, by high and low TKOS status, defined as above and below the TKOS median of 6 ( Figure 1 ). Subjects with persistent pain were defined based on WOMAC pain scores at 4 out of 5 time points higher than the thresholds listed in Table 2 ; at each threshold, mean differences in TKOS were tested using analysis of variance among those with and without persistent pain. Results The distribution of baseline TKOS differed by progression group, with the highest TKOS among pain and x-ray progressors ( Table 1 ). In all 4 progression groups, baseline WOMAC pain scores were higher in subjects with high (>6) versus low (≤6) baseline TKOS status (P=0.0001, 0.0383, 0.0035, and 0.0466, respectively). The difference in WOMAC pain scores between TKOS high and low subgroups was constant over time ( Figure 1 ; solid curves above and parallel to dashed curves with TKOS main effect always significant [P<0.01] in all 4 progression groups), but the TKOS×Time interaction term in the longitudinal mixed model was not statistically significant, indicating that the pain difference between the TKOS high and low subgroups did not change over time. TKOS was highly associated with persistent pain, with TKOS higher at all thresholds ( Table 2 ). Table 1. Distribution Parameters of TKOS at Baseline by OA Progression Type Progression Type TKOS P value) --- n Mean SD --- X-ray and pain 194 10.43 6.60 <0.0001 X-ray only 103 8.79 6.56 0.06 Pain only 103 8.03 5.91 0.22 None 200 7.32 6.07 - Table 2. Group Sizes and TKOS Mean Differences for Different WOMAC Pain Thresholds for Persistent Pain WOMAC Pain Threshold Subjects With Persistent Pain, n TKOS Difference for Subjects With Persistent Pain vs Those Without P value --- 2 211 2.5 <0.0001 3 150 2.4 <0.0001 4 112 2.4 0.0001 6 52 3.6 <0.0001 8 21 2.5 0.06 Conclusions TKOS is a candidate biomarker for current and persistent pain in knee OA patients and may be a predictive biomarker for reduced placebo response rates in clinical trials. Acknowledgements AbbVie funded the analysis; participated in analysis, design and interpretation and in abstract writing, review, and approval; and funded writing support by M. Theisen of CPS. Disclosure of Interest S. Feng Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, M. Levesque Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie |
Author | Feng, S Levesque, MC |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: S surname: Feng fullname: Feng, S organization: AbbVie Inc., Worcester, MA, United States – sequence: 2 givenname: MC surname: Levesque fullname: Levesque, MC organization: AbbVie Inc., Worcester, MA, United States |
BookMark | eNqVkL9qwzAQxkVJoUnadxBkdipZlmTTKYT-g0CHprOQ5TOxk0iuZA_ZuvRF-yRV6g5dCwfHfdz3HfeboYl1FhBaULKklIlbba3fwXCsmpCkhMoEhoP2S04KfoGmNBN5lAWZoCkhhCVZIeQVmoXQxpHkNJ8i-7raEp6Jr4_Prev1AbvQg-t2px5wMM4DbgLWuGzcUfs9eOxqbAbvwfZY2wp34EMTLXHsdGNxrL0FGGO073e-6WNCGMoWTB-u0WWtDwFufvscvT3cb9dPyebl8Xm92iQlzQlP0hSkZJRlnIPJOKtFbnIJdVETqg2UleEp1BkteMo0Fbksa2kYiyIzRMiKzdFizO28ex8g9Kp1g7fxpEoJYzJnaYydo7txy3gXgodadb6Jf54UJeoMWP0BrM6A1Q9gdQYc3WJ0l8f2X8ZvSxOKww |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2017, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions Copyright: 2017 © 2017, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2017, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions – notice: Copyright: 2017 © 2017, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 88I 8AF 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI BTHHO CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9- K9. LK8 M0R M0S M1P M2P M7P PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U |
DOI | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-eular.5095 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Science Database (Alumni Edition) STEM Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection BMJ Journals ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection (UHCL Subscription) Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biological Sciences Consumer Health Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Proquest Medical Database Science Database Biological Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest AP Science ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Family Health (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest Family Health ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition BMJ Journals ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Central Student |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1468-2060 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1136_annrheumdis_2017_eular_5095 annrheumdis |
GroupedDBID | --- .55 .GJ .VT 169 23M 2WC 39C 3O- 4.4 40O 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 7X7 7~S 88E 88I 8AF 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8R4 8R5 AAHLL AAKAS AAOJX AAWJN AAWTL AAXUO ABAAH ABJNI ABKDF ABMQD ABOCM ABTFR ABUWG ABVAJ ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACGTL ACHTP ACMFJ ACOAB ACOFX ACPRK ACQSR ACTZY ADBBV ADCEG ADFRT ADUGQ ADZCM AEKJL AENEX AFKRA AFWFF AGQPQ AHMBA AHNKE AHQMW AJYBZ AKKEP ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN AZQEC BAWUL BBNVY BENPR BHPHI BKNYI BLJBA BOMFT BPHCQ BTFSW BTHHO BVXVI C1A C45 CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CXRWF DIK DWQXO E3Z EBS EJD F5P FDB FYUFA GNUQQ H13 HAJ HCIFZ HMCUK HYE HZ~ IAO IEA IHR INH INR IOF ITC J5H K9- KQ8 L7B LK8 M0R M1P M2P M7P N9A NTWIH NXWIF O9- OK1 OVD P2P PHGZT PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q2X R53 RHI RMJ RPM RV8 RWL RXW TAE TEORI TR2 UAW UKHRP UYXKK V24 VM9 VVN W2D W8F WH7 WOQ X6Y X7M YFH YOC YQY ZGI ZXP AAFWJ AALRI AAYXX CITATION PHGZM 3V. 7XB 8FK K9. PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQUKI PRINS Q9U |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-b1805-22e77313455ec453f68c87ef9f01acebdc52ef419523a1687bf7c3352e3c067d3 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 0003-4967 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 25 10:58:39 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:58:56 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:09:03 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | Suppl 2 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b1805-22e77313455ec453f68c87ef9f01acebdc52ef419523a1687bf7c3352e3c067d3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
OpenAccessLink | https://ard.bmj.com/content/annrheumdis/76/Suppl_2/983.1.full.pdf |
PQID | 2033783245 |
PQPubID | 2041045 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_2033783245 crossref_primary_10_1136_annrheumdis_2017_eular_5095 bmj_primary_10_1136_annrheumdis_2017_eular_5095 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20170600 2017-06-00 20170601 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2017 text: 20170600 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Kidlington |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Kidlington |
PublicationTitle | Annals of the rheumatic diseases |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | Elsevier Limited |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Limited |
SSID | ssj0000818 |
Score | 2.2154825 |
Snippet | BackgroundX-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated associations between osteophyte severity and current pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA)... Background X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated associations between osteophyte severity and current pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA)... |
SourceID | proquest crossref bmj |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 983 |
SubjectTerms | Arthritis Biomarkers Clinical trials Knee Magnetic resonance imaging NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Osteoarthritis Pain Response rates Statistical analysis Stockholders |
Title | SAT0546 Total osteophyte score is a biomarker of current and persistent pain in knee osteoarthritis subjects |
URI | http://ard.bmj.com/content/76/Suppl_2/983.1.full https://www.proquest.com/docview/2033783245 |
Volume | 76 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LS8QwEA4-QLyIT1xfBPRabZukyZ5ERRFBEV1hbyVPXB_tut39_85kW8SLIPRS2vTwzXRmMpn5hpCTHDm6tHCJCUiqzZ1JVF_oJDhVaCsLywzmIe8fitsXfjcUwzbh1rRllZ1NjIba1RZz5LBJZ0yC-nFxPv5KcGoUnq62IzQWyTJSl6FWy6H8scQqU93EPN4v5Ao5bqeY4JCXyauffbpRA4oCltpj1ecpuE_0Mubz7bef-m2mo--5WSdrbdBIL-ZS3iALvtokK_ftsfgW-Xi-GEBQVNBBDbE0xb6NGuCbetogSyUdNVRTbLTHWpwJrQO1c1omqitHx5gygyVwO9ajisL1Xnk__wxo1mvkPaLNzGDOptkmLzfXg6vbpB2jkJhMpSLJcy8lyxgXwlsuWCiUVdKHfkgzbb1xVuQ-cMAvZzorlDRBWmzF8syCL3NshyxVdeV3CQ0QMHCdYxTmeWpT7dPMqZTbNA-5dqZHzgC6cjwnyijjBoPFpucO7BLBLiPYJYLdI7yD-X_LDjqRlO1Ph-90KrL39-N9shplHpMpB2RpOpn5Q4gtpuYoKtARWb68fnh8-gan3dCO |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKkQoXVF5qSwuWgGMg8SP2HlBVAdWWdnthK-0t-Kku0GS72RXiT_EbO-MkQr0gcaiUS5Q4h2--zMueGULeMOzRZaTPbMSm2sLbTI-kyaLXpXGqdNxiHnJyXo4vxJeZnG2QP0MtDB6rHHRiUtS-cZgjhyCdcwX0E_JwcZ3h1CjcXR1GaHS0OA2_f0HI1n44-QTyfcvY8efpx3HWTxXIbKFzmTEWlOIFF1IGJySPpXZahTiKeWFcsN5JFqIoRhCimaLUykblsDIpcAeq3XP47j1yHwxvjsGemqm_ml8XepjQJ0al2iKv-6kpOFRmeRnWV37eAjHBMgQ8ZfoOzDVaNXv1_bZdvG0Wkq073iaPeieVHnWsekw2Qv2EbE36bfin5OfXoyk4YSWdNuC7U6wTaUBcq0Bb7IpJ5y01FAv78ezPkjaRuq4NFDW1pwtM0cESuF2YeU3h-lGH0H0GmHyZ-izRdm0xR9Q-Ixd3AvBzslk3ddghNIKDIgxDry-I3OUm5IXXuXA5i8x4u0veA3TVomvMUaWAhqci6wHsCsGuEtgVgr1LxADz_y3bH0RS9T85vjNQcu_fj1-RB-Pp5Kw6Ozk_fUEeJvmnRM4-2Vwt1-EA_JqVfZnIRMm3u2bvDTxuCtA |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bT9RAFD7BJdn4YvAWEdRJ1MdK25l2Zh-IQWEDIhuiS8JbnWtYlHbZ7sb41_h1nNNLDC8mPpD0pWmnD9_5Oucy5wLwLqUeXTpzkQnUVFs4E6lRpqPgVK6tzC03FIc8meSHZ-LLeXa-Bjd9LQylVfZ7YrNRu8pSjByddM4l0k9kO6FLizjdH3-cX0c0QYpOWvtxGi1Fjv2f3-i-1btH-yjr92k6Pph-Poy6CQORSVScRWnqpeQJF1nmrch4yJVV0odRiBNtvXE2S30QyQjdNZ3kSpogLVUpeW5xm3ccv_sA1iV5RQNY_3QwOf32Vw-oRPXz-sQol0N4281QoREziwu_unKzGmmKesJTzukHVN6k48zV5V0teVdJNJpvvAGPOpOV7bUcewxrvnwCw5PuUP4p_Pq-N0WTLGfTCi15RlUjFQpv6VlNPTLZrGaaUZk_ZQItWBWYbZtCMV06NqeAHS7B27melQyvn6X37WeQ1xdN1yVWrwxFjOpncHYvED-HQVmV_gWwgOaK0CnZgF7ENtY-TpyKhY3TkGpnNmEHoSvmbZuOonFveFNy3YNdENhFA3ZBYG-C6GH-v2XbvUiK7pend3qCvvz34zcwROYWX48mx1vwsBF_E9XZhsFysfKv0MhZmtcdmxj8uG8C3wIPfxBr |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SAT0546+Total+osteophyte+score+is+a+biomarker+of+current+and+persistent+pain+in+knee+osteoarthritis+subjects&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+the+rheumatic+diseases&rft.au=Feng%2C+S&rft.au=Levesque%2C+MC&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Limited&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.volume=76&rft.spage=983&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136%2Fannrheumdis-2017-eular.5095&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0003-4967&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0003-4967&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0003-4967&client=summon |